← 返回论文检索
ICML 2024PosterAccept (Poster)

Language Models as Science Tutors

Alexis Chevalier, Jiayi Geng, Alexander Wettig, Howard Chen, Sebastian Mizera, Toni Annala, Max Aragon, Arturo Fanlo, Simon Frieder, Simon Machado, Akshara P, Ellie Thieu, Jiachen Wang, Zirui Wang, Xindi Wu, Mengzhou Xia, Wenhan Xia, Jiatong Yu, Junjie Zhu, Zhiyong Ren, Sanjeev Arora, Danqi Chen

BCG X / Princeton · Princeton University · Institue for Advanced Study, Princeton · Hebrew University of Jerusalem · Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford · ETHZ - ETH Zurich · National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal · University of Wisconsin - Madison · Department of Computer Science, Princeton University · University of Colorado at Boulder

PDF 由论文原始站点提供,PaperCompass 不保存论文文件。

摘要

NLP has recently made exciting progress toward training language models (LMs) with strong scientific problem-solving skills. However, model development has not focused on real-life use-cases of LMs for science, including applications in education that require processing long scientific documents. To address this, we introduce TutorEval and TutorChat. TutorEval is a diverse question-answering benchmark consisting of questions about long chapters from STEM textbooks, written by experts. TutorEval helps measure real-life usability of LMs as scientific assistants, and it is the first benchmark combining long contexts, free-form generation, and multi-disciplinary scientific knowledge. Moreover, we show that fine-tuning base models with existing dialogue datasets leads to poor performance on TutorEval. Therefore, we create TutorChat, a dataset of 80,000 long synthetic dialogues about textbooks. We use TutorChat to fine-tune Llemma models with 7B and 34B parameters. These LM tutors specialized in math have a 32K-token context window, and they excel at TutorEval while performing strongly on GSM8K and MATH. Our datasets build on open-source materials, and we release our models, data, and evaluations publicly.