← 返回论文检索
ICML 2026PosterAccept (regular)

Euclean: Automated Geometry Problem Formalization with Unified Verification in Lean

Linbin Tang, Jingyan You, Zilin Kang, Hanzhang Liu, Sophia Zhang, Zenan Li, Chenrui Cao, Liangcheng Song, Jiaao Wu, Xian Zhang, Fan Yang

Tsinghua University · Tsinghua University, Tsinghua University · New York University · Massachusetts Institute of Technology · Department of Computer Science, ETHZ - ETH Zurich · University of Science and Technology of China · Research, Microsoft

PDF 由论文原始站点提供,PaperCompass 不保存论文文件。

摘要

Recent formal reasoning systems achieve IMO-level performance, but create a fragmented landscape: algebra and number theory use Lean, while geometry relies on domain-specific languages with limited formal guarantees. This fragmentation increases the trusted computing base and hinders unified model development. Existing geometry-in-Lean efforts (LeanEuclid, LeanGeo) introduce custom axiom systems incompatible with standard \mathlib{}, and their small scale ($<$1K problems) prevents large-scale training. However, native \mathlib{} autoformalization of geometry poses unique challenges: explicating implicit diagrammatic assumptions (e.g., topological configuration and non-degeneracy)---unlike existing custom systems that defer validity checks to external solvers---and adapting to \mathlib{}'s small, rapidly-evolving geometric constructs. We present \method{}, a framework that addresses these challenges through a four-stage pipeline---constraint explication, configuration anchoring, formalization mapping, and iterative repair---to automatically formalize geometry in native \mathlib{}. We construct OMNI-Geometry (768 competition problems) and Numina-Geometry (177,597 problems), the largest geometry formalization dataset in Lean. Human evaluation shows 48.89\% TOP1 and 73.33\% TOP5 accuracy. Training Goedel v2 on our formalizations improves proof success from 13.6\% to 15.1\%, validating dataset quality for unified neural theorem proving.