← 返回论文检索
ICML 2026PosterAccept (regular)

AdvEvo-MARL: Shaping Internalized Safety through Adversarial Co-Evolution in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Zhenyu Pan, Yiting Zhang, Zhuo Liu, Yolo Tang, Zeliang Zhang, Haozheng Luo, Chenwei Xu, Yuwei Han, Jianshu Zhang, Dennis Wu, Hong-Yu Chen, Haoran Lu, Haoyang Fang, Manling Li, Chenliang Xu, Philip Yu, Han Liu

Northwestern University · South China University of Technology · University of Rochester · Northwestern University/ ByteDance · University of Illinois at Chicago · Peking University · Amazon · UIC · Northwestern

PDF 由论文原始站点提供,PaperCompass 不保存论文文件。

摘要

LLM-based multi-agent systems excel at planning, tool use, and role coordination, but their openness and interaction complexity also expose them to jailbreak and adversarial collaboration. Existing defenses fall into two lines: (i) self-verification that asks each agent to pre-filter unsafe instructions before execution, and (ii) external guard modules that police behaviors. The former often underperforms because a standalone agent lacks sufficient capacity to detect cross-agent unsafe chains and delegation-induced risks; the latter increases system overhead and creates a single-point-of-failure—once compromised, system-wide safety collapses, and adding more guards worsens cost and complexity. To solve these challenges, we propose AdvEvo-MARL, a co-evolutionary multi-agent reinforcement learning framework that internalizes safety into task agents. Rather than relying on external guards, AdvEvo-MARL jointly optimizes attackers (which synthesize evolving jailbreak prompts) and defenders (task agents trained to both accomplish their duties and resist attacks) in adversarial learning environments. To stabilize learning and foster cooperation, we introduce a public baseline for advantage estimation: agents within the same functional group share a group-level mean-return baseline, enabling lower-variance updates and stronger intra-group coordination. Across representative attack scenarios, AdvEvo-MARL consistently keeps attack-success rate (ASR) below 20\%, whereas baselines reach up to 38.33\%, while preserving or even improving task accuracy (up to +3.67\%). These results show that safety and utility can be jointly improved without relying on extra guard agents or added system overhead.