← 返回论文检索
ICML 2026PosterAccept (regular)

Position: We Need Practical AI Alignment Methods that Mirror Human Reasoning

Vijay Keswani, Breanna Nguyen, Cyrus Cousins, Vincent Conitzer, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Jana Schaich Borg

IIT Delhi · Duke University · CMU

PDF 由论文原始站点提供,PaperCompass 不保存论文文件。

摘要

AI systems are increasingly employed as decision aids, decision delegates, or autonomous decision-makers. This position paper argues that in many settings, particularly high-stakes decision-making, we need accurate cognitively-aligned AI systems that reason similarly to their users, and faithfully communicate their reasoning. We review evidence that cognitive alignment improves understandability and trustworthiness, and provide new survey data showing that many users find cognitive alignment “essential” when an AI’s rationale for a judgment or action is important to them. We outline the gaps between existing alignment methods and what is needed to achieve cognitive alignment, and present a research agenda to address these gaps. We argue that cognitive alignment represents a likely impediment to AI adoption in many envisioned applications, and that addressing it is important for creating AI systems on which users are both willing and justified to rely.