← 返回论文检索
ACL 2024longmain

Pride and Prejudice: LLM Amplifies Self-Bias in Self-Refinement

Wenda Xu, Guanglei Zhu, Xuandong Zhao, Liangming Pan, Lei Li, William Wang

University of California, Santa Barbara · Carnegie Mellon University · University of California, Berkeley · School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University · UC Santa Barbara

PDF 由论文原始站点提供,PaperCompass 不保存论文文件。DOI 10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.826 ↗

摘要

Recent studies show that large language models (LLMs) improve their performance through self-feedback on certain tasks while degrade on others. We discovered that such a contrary is due to LLM’s bias in evaluating their own output. In this paper, we formally define LLM’s self-bias – the tendency to favor its own generation – using two statistics. We analyze six LLMs (GPT-4, GPT-3.5, Gemini, LLaMA2, Mixtral and DeepSeek) on translation, constrained text generation, and mathematical reasoning tasks. We find that self-bias is prevalent in all examined LLMs across multiple languages and tasks. Our analysis reveals that while the self-refine pipeline improves the fluency and understandability of model outputs, it further amplifies self-bias. To mitigate such biases, we discover that larger model size and external feedback with accurate assessment can significantly reduce bias in the self-refine pipeline, leading to actual performance improvement in downstream tasks. The code and data are released at https://github.com/xu1998hz/llm_self_bias.