← 返回论文检索
ACL 2025longmain

Biased LLMs can Influence Political Decision-Making

Jillian Fisher, Shangbin Feng, Robert Aron, Thomas Richardson, Yejin Choi, Daniel W Fisher, Jennifer Pan, Yulia Tsvetkov, Katharina Reinecke

University of Washington · University of Texas at Arlington · Computer Science Department, Stanford University and NVIDIA · Stanford University · Department of Computer Science, University of Washington · Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington

PDF 由论文原始站点提供,PaperCompass 不保存论文文件。DOI 10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.328 ↗

摘要

As modern large language models (LLMs) become integral to everyday tasks, concerns about their inherent biases and their potential impact on human decision-making have emerged. While bias in models are well-documented, less is known about how these biases influence human decisions. This paper presents two interactive experiments investigating the effects of partisan bias in LLMs on political opinions and decision-making. Participants interacted freely with either a biased liberal, biased conservative, or unbiased control model while completing these tasks. We found that participants exposed to partisan biased models were significantly more likely to adopt opinions and make decisions which matched the LLM’s bias. Even more surprising, this influence was seen when the model bias and personal political partisanship of the participant were opposite. However, we also discovered that prior knowledge of AI was weakly correlated with a reduction of the impact of the bias, highlighting the possible importance of AI education for robust mitigation of bias effects. Our findings not only highlight the critical effects of interacting with biased LLMs and its ability to impact public discourse and political conduct, but also highlights potential techniques for mitigating these risks in the future.