← 返回论文检索
ACL 2025aclfindings

Let The Jury Decide: Fair Demonstration Selection for In-Context Learning through Incremental Greedy Evaluation

Sadaf Md Halim, Chen Zhao, Xintao Wu, Latifur Khan, Christan Grant, Fariha Ishrat Rahman, Feng Chen

The University of Texas at Dallas · Baylor University · University of Texas at Dallas · University of Florida · University of Texas, Dallas

PDF 由论文原始站点提供,PaperCompass 不保存论文文件。DOI 10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.968 ↗

摘要

Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful in-context learners, achieving strong performance with just a few high-quality demonstrations. However, fairness concerns arise in many in-context classification tasks, especially when predictions involve sensitive attributes. To address this, we propose JUDGE—a simple yet effective framework for selecting fair and representative demonstrations that improve group fairness in In-Context Learning. JUDGE constructs the demonstration set iteratively using a greedy approach, guided by a small, carefully selected jury set. Our method remains robust across varying LLM architectures and datasets, ensuring consistent fairness improvements. We evaluate JUDGE on four datasets using four LLMs, comparing it against seven baselines. Results show that JUDGE consistently improves fairness metrics without compromising accuracy.