← 返回论文检索
NeurIPS 2024PosterAccept (Poster)

4DBInfer: A 4D Benchmarking Toolbox for Graph-Centric Predictive Modeling on RDBs

Minjie Wang, Quan Gan, David Wipf, Zheng Zhang, Christos Faloutsos, Weinan Zhang, Muhan Zhang, Zhenkun Cai, Jiahang Li, Zunyao Mao, Yakun Song, Jianheng Tang, Yanlin Zhang, Guang Yang, Chuan Lei, Xiao Qin, Ning Li, Han Zhang, Yanbo Wang, Zizhao Zhang

Amazon · New York University · AWS · Shanghai New York Univeristy · CMU · Shanghai Jiao Tong University · Peking University · Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong · AWS Shanghai AI Lab · Southern University of Science and Technology · The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology · Fudan University · Amazon Web Services · Shanghai Jiaotong University · University of California, Los Angeles · Tsinghua University, Tsinghua University

PDF 由论文原始站点提供,PaperCompass 不保存论文文件。

摘要

Given a relational database (RDB), how can we predict missing column values in some target table of interest? Although RDBs store vast amounts of rich, informative data spread across interconnected tables, the progress of predictive machine learning models as applied to such tasks arguably falls well behind advances in other domains such as computer vision or natural language processing. This deficit stems, at least in part, from the lack of established/public RDB benchmarks as needed for training and evaluation purposes. As a result, related model development thus far often defaults to tabular approaches trained on ubiquitous single-table benchmarks, or on the relational side, graph-based alternatives such as GNNs applied to a completely different set of graph datasets devoid of tabular characteristics. To more precisely target RDBs lying at the nexus of these two complementary regimes, we explore a broad class of baseline models predicated on: (i) converting multi-table datasets into graphs using various strategies equipped with efficient subsampling, while preserving tabular characteristics; and (ii) trainable models with well-matched inductive biases that output predictions based on these input subgraphs. Then, to address the dearth of suitable public benchmarks and reduce siloed comparisons, we assemble a diverse collection of (i) large-scale RDB datasets and (ii) coincident predictive tasks. From a delivery standpoint, we operationalize the above four dimensions (4D) of exploration within a unified, scalable open-source toolbox called 4DBInfer; please see https://github.com/awslabs/multi-table-benchmark .