← 返回论文检索
EMNLP 2025mainmain

Assumed Identities: Quantifying Gender Bias in Machine Translation of Gender-Ambiguous Occupational Terms

Orfeas Menis Mastromichalakis, Giorgos Filandrianos, Maria Symeonaki, Giorgos Stamou

National Technical University of Athens · Panteios University of Economics and Political Sciences Athens

PDF 由论文原始站点提供,PaperCompass 不保存论文文件。DOI 10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.1640 ↗

摘要

Machine Translation (MT) systems frequently encounter gender-ambiguous occupational terms, where they must assign gender without explicit contextual cues. While individual translations in such cases may not be inherently biased, systematic patterns—such as consistently translating certain professions with specific genders—can emerge, reflecting and perpetuating societal stereotypes. This ambiguity challenges traditional instance-level single-answer evaluation approaches, as no single gold standard translation exists. To address this, we introduce GRAPE, a probability-based metric designed to evaluate gender bias by analyzing aggregated model responses. Alongside this, we present GAMBIT, a benchmarking dataset in English with gender-ambiguous occupational terms. Using GRAPE, we evaluate several MT systems and examine whether their gendered translations in Greek and French align with or diverge from societal stereotypes, real-world occupational gender distributions, and normative standards.