← 返回论文检索
ACM Multimedia 2025Generative AI: Social Aspects of Generative AI

Choose Your Expert: Uncertainty-Guided Expert Selection for Continual Deepfake Detection

Xueyi Zhang 0001, Peiyin Zhu, Jinping Sui, Xiaoda Yang, Jiahe Tian, Mingrui Lao, Siqi Cai 0002, Yanming Guo, Jun Tang 0001

PDF 由论文原始站点提供,PaperCompass 不保存论文文件。DOI 10.1145/3746027.3755398 ↗

摘要

The rapid evolution of deepfake techniques presents dual challenges for detection models: adapting to continuously shifting attack distributions while retaining previously learned knowledge. Although recent continual deepfake detection methods have made progress, they often rely on replay-based training, which limits scalability and deployment. Meanwhile, the task structure of deepfake detection offers a unique opportunity that remains under-explored: it is inherently a binary classification problem with a fixed label space, where the main difficulty lies in distributional drift rather than class expansion. This insight enables the modeling of each incremental distribution shift as a dedicated expert, focusing on specific forgery patterns. To this end, we propose a novel analytically driven, replay-free continual detection framework that eliminates the need for iterative gradient updates. In this framework, task-specific experts are constructed via closed-form ridge regression, requiring only a single forward pass and ensuring non-interference with previous tasks. To enhance the model's capacity for fine-grained forgery recognition, we introduce a lightweight Forgery-Aware Residual Enhancer (FARE). At inference, an Uncertainty-Guided Expert Selection module (UGES) dynamically routes each sample to the most confident expert, which does not require prior knowledge of the attack type. The proposed framework achieves a favorable trade-off between efficiency, privacy, and generalization. It achieves state-of-the-art performance across four benchmark datasets, with an average accuracy of 91.82% and only 1.78% forgetting. Notably, it improves cross-forgery generalization by 9.28% on unseen forgery types, demonstrating strong generalization.