← 返回论文检索
ICLR 2026PosterAccept (Poster)

CMPhysBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Condensed Matter Physics

Weida Wang, Dongchen Huang, Jiatong LI, Tengchao Yang, Ziyang Zheng, Chuyi Peng, Di Zhang, Dong Han, Benteng Chen, Binzhao Luo, Zhiyu Liu, kunling liu, Zhiyuan Gao, Shiqigeng geng, Wei Ma, Jiaming Su, Xin Li, Shuchen Pu, Yuhan Shui, Qianjia Cheng, Zhihao Dou, Dongfei Cui, Changyong He, Jin Zeng, Zeke Xie, Mao Su, Dongzhan Zhou, Yuqiang Li, Wanli Ouyang, Yunqi Cai, Xi Dai, Shufei Zhang, LEI BAI, Jinguang Cheng, Zhong Fang, Hongming Weng

Shanghai AI Laboratory · Institute of Physics, CAS · Hong Kong Polytechnic University · Tongji University · Institute of Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences · University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences · Fudan University · Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory · University of Hong Kong · Hunan Normal University · Lanzhou University of Technology · Zhengzhou University · University of Science and Technology of China · Kean College · Zhejiang University · Case Western Reserve University · Duke University · The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) · Shanghai AI Lab · Chinese Academy of Sciences · Hong Kong University of Science and Technology · Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

PDF 由论文原始站点提供,PaperCompass 不保存论文文件。

摘要

We introduce CMPhysBench, designed to assess the proficiency of Large Language Models (LLMs) in Condensed Matter Physics, as a novel Benchmark. CMPhysBench is composed of more than 520 graduate-level meticulously curated questions covering both representative subfields and foundational theoretical frameworks of condensed matter physics, such as magnetism, superconductivity, strongly correlated systems, etc. To ensure a deep understanding of the problem-solving process,we focus exclusively on calculation problems, requiring LLMs to independently generate comprehensive solutions. Meanwhile, leveraging tree-based representations of expressions, we introduce the Scalable Expression Edit Distance (SEED) score, which provides fine-grained (non-binary) partial credit and yields a more accurate assessment of similarity between prediction and ground-truth. Our results show that even the best models, Grok-4, reach only 36 average SEED score and 29% accuracy on CMPhysBench, underscoring a significant capability gap, especially for this practical and frontier domain relative to traditional physics.