Recent advancements in open-source multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) have primarily focused on enhancing foundational capabilities, leaving a significant gap in human preference alignment. This paper introduces OmniAlign-V, a comprehensive dataset of 200K high-quality training samples featuring diverse images, complex questions, and varied response formats to improve MLLMs’ alignment with human preferences. We also present MM-AlignBench, a human-annotated benchmark specifically designed to evaluate MLLMs’ alignment with human values. Experimental results show that finetuning MLLMs with OmniAlign-V, using Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) or Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), significantly enhances human preference alignment while maintaining or enhancing performance on standard VQA benchmarks, preserving their fundamental capabilities.
论文检索
输入标题、作者或关键词，从 3,086 篇学术成果中精准定位
Recently, o1-like models have drawn significant attention, where these models produce the long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning steps to improve the reasoning abilities of existing Large Language Models (LLMs). In this paper, to understand the qualities of these long CoTs and measure the critique abilities of existing LLMs on these long CoTs, we introduce the DeltaBench including the generated long CoTs from different o1-like models (e.g., QwQ, DeepSeek-R1) for different reasoning tasks (e.g., Math, Code, General Reasoning), to measure the ability to detect errors in long COT reasoning. Based on DeltaBench, we first perform fine-grained analysis of the generated long CoTs to discover the effectiveness and efficiency of different o1-like models. Then, we conduct extensive evaluations of existing process reward models (PRMs) and critic models to detect the errors of each annotated process, which aims to investigate the boundaries and limitations of existing PRMs and critic models. Finally, we hope that DeltaBench could guide developers to better understand the long CoT reasoning abilities of their models.
Code embeddings capture the semantic representations of code and are crucial for various code-related large language model (LLM) applications, such as code search. Previous training primarily relies on optimizing the InfoNCE loss by comparing positive natural language (NL)-code pairs with in-batch negatives. However, due to the sparse nature of code contexts, training solely by comparing the major differences between positive and negative pairs may fail to capture deeper semantic nuances. To address this issue, we propose a novel order-augmented strategy for improved code search (OASIS). It leverages order-based similarity labels to train models to capture subtle differences in similarity among negative pairs. Extensive benchmark evaluations demonstrate that our OASIS model significantly outperforms previous state-of-the-art models focusing solely on major positive-negative differences. It underscores the value of exploiting subtle differences among negative pairs with order labels for effective code embedding training.
We present a family of encodings for sequence labeling dependency parsing, based on the concept of hierarchical bracketing. We show that the existing 4-bit projective encoding belongs to this family, but it is suboptimal in the number of labels used to encode a tree. We derive an optimal hierarchical bracketing, which minimizes the number of symbols used and encodes projective trees using only 12 distinct labels (vs. 16 for the 4-bit encoding). We also extend optimal hierarchical bracketing to support arbitrary non-projectivity in a more compact way than previous encodings. Our new encodings yield competitive accuracy on a diverse set of treebanks.
Topic modeling aims to discover the distribution of topics within a corpus. The advanced comprehension and generative capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have introduced new avenues for topic modeling, particularly by prompting LLMs to generate topics and refine them by merging similar ones. However, this approach necessitates that LLMs generate topics with consistent granularity, thus relying on the exceptional instruction-following capabilities of closed-source LLMs (such as GPT-4) or requiring additional training. Moreover, merging based only on topic words and neglecting the fine-grained semantics within documents might fail to fully uncover the underlying topic structure. In this work, we propose a semi-supervised topic modeling method, LiSA, that combines LLMs with clustering to improve topic generation and distribution. Specifically, we begin with prompting LLMs to generate a candidate topic word for each document, thereby constructing a topic-level semantic space. To further utilize the mutual complementarity between them, we first cluster documents and candidate topic words, and then establish a mapping from document to topic in the LLM-guided assignment stage. Subsequently, we introduce a collaborative enhancement strategy to align the two semantic spaces and establish a better topic distribution. Experimental results demonstrate that LiSA outperforms state-of-the-art methods that utilize GPT-4 on topic alignment, and exhibits competitive performance compared to Neural Topic Models on topic quality. The codes are available at https://github.com/ljh986/LiSA.
AntiLeakBench: Preventing Data Contamination by Automatically Constructing Benchmarks with Updated Real-World Knowledge
PDF ↗Data contamination hinders fair LLM evaluation by introducing test data into newer models’ training sets. Existing studies solve this challenge by updating benchmarks with newly collected data. However, they fail to guarantee contamination-free evaluation as the newly collected data may contain pre-existing knowledge, and their benchmark updates rely on intensive human labor. To address these issues, we in this paper propose AntiLeak-Bench, an automated anti-leakage benchmarking framework. Instead of simply using newly collected data, we construct samples with explicitly new knowledge absent from LLMs’ training sets, which thus ensures strictly contamination-free evaluation. We further design a fully automated workflow to build and update our benchmark without human labor. This significantly reduces the cost of benchmark maintenance to accommodate emerging LLMs. Through extensive experiments, we highlight that data contamination likely exists before LLMs’ cutoff time and demonstrate that AntiLeak-Bench effectively overcomes this challenge.
Personalized dialogue systems have advanced considerably with the integration of user-specific personas into large language models (LLMs). However, while LLMs can effectively generate personalized responses, the influence of persona sentiment on dialogue quality remains underexplored. In this work, we conduct a large-scale analysis of dialogues generated using a range of polarized user profiles. Our experiments reveal that dialogues involving negatively polarized users tend to overemphasize persona attributes. In contrast, positively polarized profiles yield dialogues that selectively incorporate persona information, resulting in smoother interactions. Furthermore, we find that personas with weak or neutral sentiment generally produce lower-quality dialogues. Motivated by these findings, we propose a dialogue generation approach that explicitly accounts for persona polarity by combining a turn-based generation strategy with a profile ordering mechanism and sentiment-aware prompting. Our study provides new insights into the sensitivity of LLMs to persona sentiment and offers guidance for developing more robust and nuanced personalized dialogue systems.
This paper introduces DNCASR, a novel end-to-end trainable system designed for joint neural speaker clustering and automatic speech recognition (ASR), enabling speaker-attributed transcription of long multi-party meetings. DNCASR uses two separate encoders to independently encode global speaker characteristics and local waveform information, along with two linked decoders to generate speaker-attributed transcriptions. The use of linked decoders allows the entire system to be jointly trained under a unified loss function. By employing a serialised training approach, DNCASR effectively addresses overlapping speech in real-world meetings, where the link improves the prediction of speaker indices in overlapping segments. Experiments on the AMI-MDM meeting corpus demonstrate that the jointly trained DNCASR outperforms a parallel system that does not have links between the speaker and ASR decoders. Using cpWER to measure the speaker-attributed word error rate, DNCASR achieves a 9.0% relative reduction on the AMI-MDM Eval set.
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated their impressive generative capabilities, primarily due to their extensive parameterization, which enables them to encode vast knowledge. However, effectively integrating new knowledge into LLMs remains a major challenge. Current research typically first constructs novel knowledge datasets and then injects this knowledge into LLMs through various techniques. However, existing methods for constructing new datasets either rely on timestamps, which lack rigor, or use simple templates for synthesis, which are simplistic and do not accurately reflect the real world. To address this issue, we propose a novel knowledge dataset construction approach that simulates biological evolution using knowledge graphs to generate synthetic entities with diverse attributes, resulting in a dataset, NovelHuman. Systematic analysis on NovelHuman reveals that the intra-sentence position of knowledge significantly affects the acquisition of knowledge. Therefore, we introduce an intra-sentence permutation to enhance knowledge acquisition. Furthermore, given that potential conflicts exist between autoregressive (AR) training objectives and permutation-based learning, we propose PermAR, a permutation-based language modeling framework for AR models. PermAR seamlessly integrates with mainstream AR architectures, endowing them with bidirectional knowledge acquisition capabilities. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of PermAR, outperforming knowledge augmentation methods by 3.3%-38%.
With the advancement of technology, large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance across various natural language processing (NLP) tasks, powering LLM-integrated applications like Microsoft Copilot. However, as LLMs continue to evolve, new vulnerabilities, especially prompt injection attacks arise. These attacks trick LLMs into deviating from the original input instructions and executing the attacker’s instructions injected in data content, such as retrieved results. Recent attack methods leverage LLMs’ instruction-following abilities and their inabilities to distinguish instructions injected in the data content, and achieve a high attack success rate (ASR). When comparing the attack and defense methods, we interestingly find that they share similar design goals, of inducing the model to ignore unwanted instructions and instead to execute wanted instructions. Therefore, we raise an intuitive question: *Could these attack techniques be utilized for defensive purposes?* In this paper, we invert the intention of prompt injection methods to develop novel defense methods based on previous training-free attack methods, by repeating the attack process but with the original input instruction rather than the injected instruction. Our comprehensive experiments demonstrate that our defense techniques outperform existing defense approaches, achieving state-of-the-art results.
This work introduces RARE (Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning Enhancement), a versatile extension to the mutual reasoning framework (rStar), aimed at enhancing reasoning accuracy and factual integrity across large language models (LLMs) for complex, knowledge-intensive tasks such as medical and commonsense reasoning. RARE incorporates two innovative actions within the Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) framework: (A6), which generates search queries based on the initial problem statement, performs information retrieval using those queries, and augments reasoning with the retrieved data to formulate the final answer; and (A7), which leverages information retrieval specifically for generated sub-questions and re-answers these sub-questions with the relevant contextual information. Additionally, a Retrieval-Augmented Factuality Scorer is proposed to replace the original discriminator, prioritizing reasoning paths that meet high standards of factuality. Experimental results with LLaMA 3.1 show that RARE enables open-source LLMs to achieve competitive performance with top closed-source models like GPT-4 and GPT-4o. This research establishes RARE as a scalable solution for improving LLMs in domains where logical coherence and factual integrity are critical.
Tool invocation significantly enhances the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), yet challenges persist, particularly in complex task scenarios. Current methods, such as instruction-enhanced reasoning and supervised fine-tuning, often result in unnecessarily long reasoning paths and face difficulties in verifying the correctness of intermediate steps. In this paper, we propose CodeTool, a novel framework for stepwise code generation that improves LLM tool invocation by leveraging the concise and easily verifiable nature of code. CodeTool incorporates two distinct process rewards: the On-the-spot Reward, which provides immediate feedback on the accuracy of each tool invocation, and the Latent Reward, which assesses the contribution of each step toward overall task completion. By maximizing the cumulative reward of the On-the-spot and Latend Rewards at each step, LLMs are guided to follow efficient and accurate reasoning paths. Extensive experiments on StableToolBench and RestBench-TMDB demonstrate the superiority of CodeTool over existing approaches.
Detecting abusive language in social media conversations poses significant challenges, as identifying abusiveness often depends on the conversational context, characterized by the content and topology of preceding comments. Traditional Abusive Language Detection (ALD) models often overlook this context, which can lead to unreliable performance metrics. Recent Natural Language Processing (NLP) approaches that incorporate conversational context often rely on limited or overly simplified representations of this context, leading to inconsistent and sometimes inconclusive results. In this paper, we propose a novel approach that utilizes graph neural networks (GNNs) to model social media conversations as graphs, where nodes represent comments, and edges capture reply structures. We systematically investigate various graph representations and context windows to identify the optimal configurations for ALD. Our GNN model outperforms both context-agnostic baselines and linear context-aware methods, achieving significant improvements in F1 scores. These findings demonstrate the critical role of structured conversational context and establish GNNs as a robust framework for advancing context-aware ALD.
Multilingual Encoder Knows more than You Realize: Shared Weights Pretraining for Extremely Low-Resource Languages
PDF ↗While multilingual language models like XLM-R have advanced multilingualism in NLP, they still perform poorly in extremely low-resource languages. This situation is exacerbated by the fact that modern LLMs such as LLaMA and Qwen support far fewer languages than XLM-R, making text generation models non-existent for many languages in the world. To tackle this challenge, we propose a novel framework for adapting multilingual encoders to text generation in extremely low-resource languages. By reusing the weights between the encoder and the decoder, our framework allows the model to leverage the learned semantic space of the encoder, enabling efficient learning and effective generalization in low-resource languages. Applying this framework to four Chinese minority languages, we present XLM-SWCM, and demonstrate its superior performance on various downstream tasks even when compared with much larger models.
A well-known issue with Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) is that retrieved passages that are irrelevant to the query sometimes distract the answer-generating LLM, causing it to provide an incorrect response. In this paper, we shed light on this core issue and formulate the distracting effect of a passage w.r.t. a query (and an LLM). We provide a quantifiable measure of the distracting effect of a passage and demonstrate its robustness across LLMs. Our research introduces novel methods for identifying and using hard distracting passages to improve RAG systems. By fine-tuning LLMs with these carefully selected distracting passages, we achieve up to a 7.5% increase in answering accuracy compared to counterparts fine-tuned on conventional RAG datasets. Our contribution is two-fold: first, we move beyond the simple binary classification of irrelevant passages as either completely unrelated vs. distracting, and second, we develop and analyze multiple methods for finding hard distracting passages. To our knowledge, no other research has provided such a comprehensive framework for identifying and utilizing hard distracting passages.
Automatic language identification is a core problem of many Natural LanguageProcessing (NLP) pipelines. A wide variety of architectures and benchmarks havebeen proposed with often near-perfect performance. Although previousstudies have focused on certain challenging setups (i.e. cross-domain, shortinputs), a systematic comparison is missing. We propose a benchmark that allows us to test for the effect of input size, training data size, domain, number oflanguages, scripts, and language families on performance. We evaluatefive popular models on this benchmark and identify which open challengesremain for this task as well as which architectures achieve robust performance. Wefind that cross-domain setups are the most challenging (although arguably mostrelevant), and that number of languages, variety in scripts, and variety inlanguage families have only a small impact on performance. We also contributepractical takeaways: training with 1,000 instances per language and a maximuminput length of 100 characters is enough for robust language identification.Based on our findings, we train an accurate (94.41%) multi-domain languageidentification model on 2,034 languages, for which we also provide an analysisof the remaining errors.
Prompt injection attacks manipulate large language models (LLMs) by misleading them to deviate from the original input instructions and execute maliciously injected instructions, because of their instruction-following capabilities and inability to distinguish between the original input instructions and maliciously injected instructions. To defend against such attacks, recent studies have developed various detection mechanisms. If we restrict ourselves specifically to works which perform detection rather than direct defense, most of them focus on direct prompt injection attacks, while there are few works for the indirect scenario, where injected instructions are indirectly from external tools, such as a search engine. Moreover, current works mainly investigate injection detection methods and pay less attention to the post-processing method that aims to mitigate the injection after detection.In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of detecting and removing indirect prompt injection attacks, and we construct a benchmark dataset for evaluation. For detection, we assess the performance of existing LLMs and open-source detection models, and we further train detection models using our crafted training datasets. For removal, we evaluate two intuitive methods: (1) the *segmentation removal method*, which segments the injected document and removes parts containing injected instructions, and (2) the *extraction removal method*, which trains an extraction model to identify and remove injected instructions.
Inspired by theories in language psychology, it is natural to consider more constraints, such as intentions, logic, knowledge, etc., when a complex or multi-hop question is generated. As the subtask of Multi-Hop Question Generation (MHQG), the task of Multi-Constraint Multi-Hop Question Generation (MCHQG) is more aligned with human question theories. However, it is hard to determine how to bring various high-dimensional semantic constraints, and how to integrate each constraint across all hops when a multi-hop question is being generating. To address these challenges, we introduce an effective framework which includes constraint dimensionality reduction and divide-and-conquer-based dynamic projection; we call it RUBY. The proposed RUBY contains a module of high-dimensional semantic constraint dimension reduction and a module of sub-question answer pairs-based multi-hop question generation. Meanwhile, a Reasoning Dynamic Projection strategy is tailored to effectively incorporate the constraints into every hop of the multi-hop question. The experimental results demonstrate that RUBY consistently outperforms baseline models, which suggest that RUBY is able to effectively capture and integrate semantic constraints, leading to more accurate and human-like multi-hop question generation. Our code and data are available.
Segment First or Comprehend First? Explore the Limit of Unsupervised Word Segmentation with Large Language Models
PDF ↗Word segmentation stands as a cornerstone of Natural Language Processing (NLP). Based on the concept of “comprehend first, segment later”, we propose a new framework to explore the limit of unsupervised word segmentation with Large Language Models (LLMs) and evaluate the semantic understanding capabilities of LLMs based on word segmentation. We employ current mainstream LLMs to perform word segmentation across multiple languages to assess LLMs’ “comprehension”. Our findings reveal that LLMs are capable of following simple prompts to segment raw text into words. There is a trend suggesting that models with more parameters tend to perform better on multiple languages. Additionally, we introduce a novel unsupervised method, termed LLACA (\textbf{L}arge \textbf{L}anguage Model-Inspired \textbf{A}ho-\textbf{C}orasick \textbf{A}utomaton). Leveraging the advanced pattern recognition capabilities of Aho-Corasick automata, LLACA innovatively combines these with the deep insights of well-pretrained LLMs. This approach not only enables the construction of a dynamic n-gram model that adjusts based on contextual information but also integrates the nuanced understanding of LLMs, offering significant improvements over traditional methods. Our source code is available at https://github.com/hkr04/LLACA
ExploraCoder: Advancing Code Generation for Multiple Unseen APIs via Planning and Chained Exploration
PDF ↗Large language models face intrinsic limitations in coding with APIs that are unseen in their training corpora. As libraries continuously evolve, it becomes impractical to exhaustively retrain LLMs with new API knowledge. This limitation hampers LLMs from solving programming problems which require newly introduced or privately maintained libraries. Inspired by exploratory programming paradigm in human behavior, we propose **ExploraCoder**, a training-free framework that empowers LLMs to invoke multiple unseen APIs in code solution by (1) planning a complex problem into several API invocation subtasks, and (2) experimenting with correct API usage at intermediate steps through a novel chain-of-API-exploration. We conduct evaluation on program synthesizing tasks involving complex API interactions. Experimental results demonstrate that ExploraCoder significantly improves performance for models lacking prior API knowledge, achieving absolute increases of up to 11.99% over retrieval-based approaches and 17.28% over pretraining-based methods in pass@10.