论文检索

输入标题、作者或关键词,从 701 篇学术成果中精准定位

会议来源 全部会议

机器学习与综合 AI

自然语言处理

计算机视觉

数据挖掘与 Web

多媒体与图形学

未选择时检索全部会议
支持跨会议组合检索,PDF 均跳转至官方来源
701篇论文匹配“First-order”
第 10 / 36 页

Optimization · Optimization and Learning under Uncertainty

Aymeric Capitaine, Maxime Haddouche, Eric Moulines, Michael Jordan, Etienne Boursier, Alain Oliviero Durmus

Decision-focused learning (DFL) is an increasingly popular paradigm for training predictive models whose outputs are used in decision-making tasks. Instead of merely optimizing for predictive accuracy, DFL trains models to directly minimize the loss associated with downstream decisions. However, existing studies focus solely on scenarios where a fixed batch of data is available and the objective function does not change over time. We instead investigate DFL in dynamic environments where the objective function and data distribution evolve over time. This setting is challenging for online learning because the objective function has zero or undefined gradients, which prevents the use of standard first-order optimization methods, and is generally non-convex. To address these difficulties, we (i) regularize the objective to make it differentiable and (ii) use perturbation techniques along with a near-optimal oracle to overcome non-convexity. Combining those techniques yields two original online algorithms tailored for DFL, for which we establish respectively static and dynamic regret bounds. These are the first provable guarantees for the online decision-focused problem. Finally, we showcase the effectiveness of our algorithms on a knapsack experiment, where they outperform two standard benchmarks.

Ekaterina Borodich, Dmitry Kovalev

In this paper, we focus on the problem of minimizing a continuously differentiable convex objective function, $\min_x f(x)$. Recently, Malitsky (2020); Alacaoglu et al. (2023) developed an adaptive first-order method, GRAAL. This algorithm computes stepsizes by estimating the local curvature of the objective function without any line search procedures or hyperparameter tuning, and attains the standard iteration complexity $\mathcal{O}(L\Vert x_0-x^* \Vert^2/\epsilon)$ of fixed-stepsize gradient descent for $L$-smooth functions. However, a natural question arises: is it possible to accelerate the convergence of GRAAL to match the optimal complexity $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{L\Vert x_0-x^*\Vert^2/\epsilon})$ of the accelerated gradient descent of Nesterov (1983)? Although some attempts have been made by Li and Lan (2025); Suh and Ma (2025), the ability of existing accelerated algorithms to adapt to the local curvature of the objective function is highly limited. We resolve this issue and develop GRAAL with Nesterov acceleration, which can adapt its stepsize to the local curvature at a geometric, or linear, rate just like non-accelerated GRAAL. We demonstrate the adaptive capabilities of our algorithm by proving that it achieves near-optimal iteration complexities for $L$-smooth functions, as well as under a more general $(L_0,L_1)$-smoothness assumption (Zhang et al., 2019).

Optimization · Zero-order and Black-box Optimization

Shengminjie Chen, Xiaoming Sun, Wenguo Yang, Jialin Zhang, Zihan Zhao

In this work, we investigate DR-submodular maximization using stochastic biased gradients, which is a more realistic but challenging setting than stochastic unbiased gradients. We first generalize the Lyapunov framework to incorporate biased stochastic gradients, characterizing the adverse impacts of bias and noise. Leveraging this framework, we consider not only conventional constraints but also a novel constraint class: convex sets with a largest element, which naturally arises in applications such as resource allocations. For this constraint, we propose an $1/e$ approximation algorithm for non-monotone DR-submodular maximization, surpassing the hardness result $1/4$ for general convex constraints. As a direct application of stochastic biased gradients, we consider zero-order DR-submodular maximization and introduce both classical and quantum gradient estimation algorithms. In each constraint we consider, while retaining the same approximation ratio, the iteration complexity of our classical zero-order algorithms is $O(\epsilon^{-3})$, matching that of stochastic unbiased gradients; our quantum zero-order algorithms reach $O(\epsilon^{-1})$ iteration complexity, on par with classical first-order algorithms, demonstrating quantum acceleration and validated in numerical experiments.

Optimization · Non-Convex

Lesi Chen, Junru Li, EL MAHDI CHAYTI, Jingzhao Zhang

This paper studies the complexity of finding an $\epsilon$-stationary point for stochastic bilevel optimization when the upper-level problem is nonconvex and the lower-level problem is strongly convex. Recent work proposed the first-order method, F${}^2$SA, achieving the $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\epsilon^{-6})$ upper complexity bound for first-order smooth problems. This is slower than the optimal $\Omega(\epsilon^{-4})$ complexity lower bound in its single-level counterpart. In this work, we show that faster rates are achievable for higher-order smooth problems. We first reformulate F$^2$SA as approximating the hyper-gradient with a forward difference. Based on this observation, we propose a class of methods F${}^2$SA-$p$ that uses $p$th-order finite difference for hyper-gradient approximation and improves the upper bound to $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(p \epsilon^{-4-2/p})$ for $p$th-order smooth problems. Finally, we demonstrate that the $\Omega(\epsilon^{-4})$ lower bound also holds for stochastic bilevel problems when the high-order smoothness holds for the lower-level variable, indicating that the upper bound of F${}^2$SA-$p$ is nearly optimal in the highly smooth region $p = \Omega( \log \epsilon^{-1} / \log \log \epsilon^{-1})$.

General Machine Learning · Causality

Emil Javurek, Valentyn Melnychuk, Jonas Schweisthal, Konstantin Hess, Dennis Frauen, Stefan Feuerriegel

Predicting individualized potential outcomes in sequential decision-making is central for optimizing therapeutic decisions in personalized medicine (e.g., which dosing sequence to give to a cancer patient). However, predicting potential out- comes over long horizons is notoriously difficult. Existing methods that break the curse of the horizon typically lack strong theoretical guarantees such as orthogonality and quasi-oracle efficiency. In this paper, we revisit the problem of predicting individualized potential outcomes in sequential decision-making (i.e., estimating Q-functions in Markov decision processes with observational data) through a causal inference lens. In particular, we develop a comprehensive theoretical foundation for meta-learners in this setting with a focus on beneficial theoretical properties. As a result, we yield a novel meta-learner called DRQ-learner and establish that it is: (1) doubly robust (i.e., valid inference under model misspecification), (2) Neyman-orthogonal (i.e., insensitive to first-order estimation errors in the nuisance functions), and (3) achieves quasi-oracle efficiency (i.e., behaves asymptotically as if the ground-truth nuisance functions were known). Our DRQ-learner is applicable to settings with both discrete and continuous state spaces. Further, our DRQ-learner is flexible and can be used together with arbitrary machine learning models (e.g., neural networks). We validate our theoretical results through numerical experiments, thereby showing that our meta-learner outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.

Jia Zhang, Yu Bai, Hualin Zhang, Tianshuo Chen, Zhaogeng Liu, Zhiqiang Xu, Yi Chang, Bin Gu

Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) has achieved significant success in downstream tasks. However, as the model size continues to grow, traditional fine-tuning methods have become increasingly impractical due to their high computational and memory costs. This has motivated researchers to explore parameter-efficient and memory-friendly fine-tuning strategies to enable scalable approaches, with Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) standing out as a representative work. However, the LoRA update is restricted to a low-rank subspace, which results in suboptimal performance compared to the full-parameter update. Recent research has also explored memory-efficient fine-tuning LLMs using just forward passes while suffer from high variance in gradient estimation and low convergence speed. To address the issues above, we propose a new alternating optimization framework called LMAO (**L**ow-rank and **M**emory-efficient Zeroth-Order **A**lternating **O**ptimization), which combines the advantages of LoRA and MeZO. This method alternately updates the low-rank components and zeroth-order directions during training. By performing three forward propagations and one backward propagation, each update is full-rank, thereby reducing feature loss and enabling efficient fine-tuning under strict memory constraints. We provide theoretical guarantees on the convergence and convergence rate of this method. Empirical results demonstrate that, in experiments on multiple models (e.g., OPT, RoBERTa-large), LMAO achieves performance comparable to first-order methods. This presents a practical and scalable solution for fine-tuning large-scale models. Our source code is available at [https://github.com/workelaina/LMAO](https://github.com/workelaina/LMAO).

Optimization · Zero-order and Black-box Optimization

Sizhe Dang, yangyangGuo, Yanjun Zhao, Xiaodong Zheng, Guang Dai, Ivor Tsang, Haishan Ye

Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) often faces GPU memory bottlenecks: the backward pass of first-order optimizers like Adam increases memory usage to more than 10 times the inference level (e.g., 633~GB for OPT-30B). Zeroth-order (ZO) optimizers avoid this cost by estimating gradients only from forward passes, yet existing methods like MeZO usually need tens of times more steps to converge. Can this trade-off between speed and memory in ZO be fundamentally improved? Normalized-SGD, for instance, demonstrates strong empirical performance with greater memory efficiency than Adam. In light of this, we introduce FZOO, a Fast Zeroth-Order Optimizer towards Adam-Scale Speed. On the one hand, FZOO reduces the total forward passes needed for convergence by employing batched one-sided estimates that adapt step-sizes based on the standard deviation of batch losses. On the other hand, it accelerates per-batch computation through the use of Rademacher random vector (±1) perturbations, which also enables further speedups through batched evaluation. Extensive experiments on diverse models (including RoBERTa-large, the OPT family (350M-66B), Phi-2, and Llama3) across 11 varied downstream tasks validate FZOO's effectiveness. On average, FZOO outperforms MeZO by +3% in accuracy while requiring 3$\times$fewer forward passes. Notably, for the RoBERTa-large model, FZOO achieves average improvements of +5.6% in accuracy and 18$\times$reduction in forward passes compared to MeZO, achieving convergence speeds comparable to Adam. We also provide theoretical analysis proving FZOO’s formal equivalence to a normalized-SGD update rule and establishing its convergence guarantees. Beyond full-parameter tuning, FZOO plugs smoothly into PEFT techniques, unlocking even larger memory savings. Taken together, our results make single-GPU, high-speed, full-parameter fine-tuning realistic today and point toward future work on memory-efficient pre-training. Code: https://github.com/DKmiyan/FZOO

Deep Learning · Theory

Yuhao Liu, Yu Chen, Rui Hu, Longbo Huang

Stochastic interpolants offer a robust framework for continuously transforming samples between arbitrary data distributions via ordinary or stochastic differential equations (ODEs/SDEs), holding significant promise for generative modeling. While previous studies have analyzed the finite-time convergence rate of discrete-time implementations for SDEs, the ODE counterpart remains largely unexplored. In this work, we bridge this gap by presenting a rigorous finite-time convergence analysis of numerical implementations for ODEs in the framework of stochastic interpolants. We establish novel discrete-time total variation error bounds for two widely used numerical solvers: the first-order forward Euler method and the second-order Heun's method. Our analysis also yields optimized iteration complexity results and step size schedules that enhance computational efficiency. Notably, when specialized to the diffusion model setting, our theoretical guarantees for the second-order method improve upon prior results in terms of both smoothness requirements and dimensional dependence. Our theoretical findings are corroborated by numerical and image generation experiments, which validate the derived error bounds and complexity analyses.

Deep Learning · Algorithms

Nathan Lichtlé, Alexi Canesse, Zhe Fu, HOSSEIN MATIN, Maria Delle Monache, Alexandre M Bayen

We introduce (U)NFV, a modular neural network architecture that generalizes classical finite volume (FV) methods for solving hyperbolic conservation laws. Hyperbolic partial differential equations (PDEs) are challenging to solve, particularly conservation laws whose physically relevant solutions contain shocks and discontinuities. FV methods are widely used for their mathematical properties: convergence to entropy solutions, flow conservation, or total variation diminishing, but often lack accuracy and flexibility in complex settings. Neural Finite Volume addresses these limitations by learning update rules over extended spatial and temporal stencils while preserving conservation structure. It supports both supervised training on solution data (NFV) and unsupervised training via weak-form residual loss (UNFV). Applied to first-order conservation laws, (U)NFV achieves up to 10x lower error than Godunov's method, outperforms ENO/WENO, and rivals discontinuous Galerkin solvers with lower implementation burden. On traffic modeling problems, both from PDEs and from experimental highway data, (U)NFV captures nonlinear wave dynamics with significantly higher fidelity and scalability than traditional FV approaches.

Reinforcement Learning · Batch/Offline

Qiyang Li, Sergey Levine

We propose Q-learning with Adjoint Matching (QAM), a novel TD-based reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm that tackles a long-standing challenge in continuous-action RL: efficient optimization of an expressive diffusion or flow-matching policy with respect to a parameterized Q-function. Effective optimization requires exploiting the first-order information of the critic, but it is challenging to do so for flow or diffusion policies because direct gradient-based optimization via backpropagation through their multi-step denoising process is numerically unstable. Existing methods work around this either by only using the value and discarding the gradient information, or by relying on approximations that sacrifice policy expressivity or bias the learned policy. QAM sidesteps both of these challenges by leveraging adjoint matching, a recently proposed technique in generative modeling, which transforms the critic's action gradient to form a step-wise objective function that is free from unstable backpropagation, while providing an unbiased, expressive policy at the optimum. Combined with temporal-difference backup for critic learning, QAM consistently outperforms prior approaches on hard, sparse reward tasks in both offline and offline-to-online RL.

Social Aspects · Fairness, Equity, Justice and Safety

Yicheng Lang, Yihua Zhang, Chongyu Fan, Changsheng Wang, Jinghan Jia, Sijia Liu

Large language model (LLM) unlearning aims to surgically remove the influence of undesired data or knowledge from an existing model while preserving its utility on unrelated tasks. This paradigm has shown promise in addressing privacy and safety concerns. However, recent findings reveal that unlearning effects are often *fragile*: post-unlearning manipulations such as weight quantization or fine-tuning can quickly neutralize the intended forgetting. Prior efforts to improve robustness primarily reformulate unlearning objectives by explicitly assuming the role of vulnerability sources. In this work, we take a different perspective by investigating the role of the *optimizer*, independent of unlearning objectives and formulations, in shaping unlearning robustness. We show that the "*grade*" of the optimizer, defined by the level of information it exploits, ranging from zeroth-order (gradient-free) to first-order (gradient-based) to second-order (Hessian-based), is tightly linked to the resilience of unlearning. Surprisingly, we find that downgrading the optimizer, such as using zeroth-order methods or compressed-gradient variants (*e.g.,* gradient sign-based optimizers), often leads to stronger robustness. While these optimizers produce noisier and less precise updates, they encourage convergence to harder-to-disturb basins in the loss landscape, thereby resisting post-training perturbations. By connecting zeroth-order methods with randomized smoothing, we further highlight their natural advantage for robust unlearning. Motivated by these insights, we propose a *hybrid optimizer* that combines first-order and zeroth-order updates, preserving unlearning efficacy while enhancing robustness. Extensive experiments on the MUSE and WMDP benchmarks, across multiple LLM unlearning algorithms, validate that our approach achieves more resilient forgetting without sacrificing unlearning quality.

Computer Vision · Classification and Understanding

Chengjie Ge, Yufeng Peng, Zihao Li, Qiyu Kang, Xueyang Fu, Xuhao Li, Qixin ZHANG, Ren Junhao, Zheng-Jun Zha

Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) draw inspiration from biological neurons to enable brain-like computation, demonstrating effectiveness in processing temporal information with energy efficiency and biological realism. Most existing SNNs are based on neural dynamics such as the (leaky) integrate-and-fire (IF/LIF) models, which are described by *first-order* ordinary differential equations (ODEs) with Markovian characteristics. This means the potential state at any time depends solely on its immediate past value, potentially limiting network expressiveness. Empirical studies of real neurons, however, reveal long-range correlations and fractal dendritic structures, suggesting non-Markovian behavior better modeled by *fractional-order* ODEs. Motivated by this, we propose a *fractional-order* spiking neural network (f-SNN) framework that strictly generalizes integer-order SNNs and captures long-term dependencies in membrane potential and spike trains via fractional dynamics, enabling richer temporal patterns. We also release an open-source toolbox to support the f-SNN framework, applicable to diverse architectures and real-world tasks. Experimentally, fractional adaptations of established SNNs into the f-SNN framework achieve superior accuracy, comparable energy efficiency, and improved robustness to noise, underscoring the promise of f-SNNs as an effective extension of traditional SNNs.

Junhao Dong, Xinghua Qu, Cong Zhang, Qi Rong Sua, Nguyen Duc Thai, Wenbo Pan, Xinfeng Li, Tongliang Liu, Piotr Koniusz, Yew-Soon Ong

Foundation Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel across benchmarks yet remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks. While adversarial fine-tuning improves robustness, attaining a desirable clean–robust performance trade-off typically requires costly hyperparameter searches with multiple retraining runs. A promising alternative is to merge task vectors (i.e., parameter displacements from pre-trained models) to balance accuracy and robustness without retraining. However, we find that naive task-vector merging produces a near-linear trade-off, as it equally weights all coordinates and fails to distinguish weights that aid both objectives from those that create conflicts. To overcome this limitation, we propose a prediction stability-aware merging framework that composes task vectors from off-the-shelf naturally and robustly fine-tuned VLMs. Our key insight is that prediction stability serves as a proxy for cross-objective compatibility, enabling us to favor perturbation-invariant parameters while attenuating those with high cross-objective impact. Specifically, we estimate per-parameter stability from gradients under both objectives, building complementary masks that retain jointly stable coordinates while suppressing counterpart-sensitive ones. We further refine these masks along adversarial parameter trajectories, with steps weighted by a prediction-sensitivity index. Our theoretical analysis shows that the masks provably contract first-order cross-objective interference, and the prediction criticality index tracks curvature, biasing the merge toward flatter minima and better generalization. Extensive experiments across benchmarks and scenarios demonstrate our method consistently achieves superior clean–robust trade-offs over prior approaches, with the learned balance transferring effectively to downstream tasks.

General Machine Learning · Transfer, Multitask and Meta-learning

Zhengyan Wan, Yidong Ouyang, Liyan Xie, Fang Fang, Hongyuan Zha, Guang Cheng

Guidance provides a simple and effective framework for posterior sampling by steering the generation process towards the desired distribution. When modeling discrete data, existing approaches mostly focus on guidance with the first-order approximation to improve the sampling efficiency. However, such an approximation is inappropriate in discrete state spaces since the approximation error could be large. A novel guidance framework for discrete data is proposed to address this problem: we derive the exact transition rate for the desired distribution given a learned discrete flow matching model, leading to guidance that only requires a single forward pass in each sampling step, significantly improving efficiency. This unified novel framework is general enough, encompassing existing guidance methods as special cases, and it can also be seamlessly applied to the masked diffusion model. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed guidance on energy-guided simulations and preference alignment on text-to-image generation and multimodal understanding tasks.

Applications · Language, Speech and Dialog

Parthiv Chatterjee, Asish Batha, Tashvi patel, Sourish Dasgupta, Tanmoy Chakraborty

Document summarization helps readers focus on the "content-of-interest", a *subjective* and *time-variant* quantity. Capturing this *dynamic subjectivity* requires modeling how user preferences evolve over time, thereby demanding *personalized summarization*. Recent news recommendation and summarization models often assume that preferences follow a *memoryless or short-memory random walk* on interaction graphs, i.e., a Markovian diffusion seeded at the latest interaction or compressed into a short hidden state or prompt. We ask whether such a hypothesis also holds for personalized summarization. To test this, we propose **Walk2Pers**, a lightweight encoder–decoder framework that extends the walk view with *action-conditioned geometric steps*, decomposed into (i) a *magnitude* controlling shift strength and (ii) an *orientation* capturing continuity vs. novelty. The process is mediated by dual memory lanes that reinforce consistent interests while suppressing disinterest, and is augmented with a drift term for summary requests. We show theoretically that such structured walks approximate first-order action-conditioned kernels, and empirically validate the hypothesis on PENS, OpenAI-Reddit, and PersonalSum. Using PerSEval, a personalization metric with strong human correlation, Walk2Pers outperforms specialized personalized summarizers by an average of $0.41 \uparrow$, and strong LLM baselines (DeepSeek-R1-14B, LLaMA-2-13B, Mistral-7B, Zephyr-7B) by $0.22 \uparrow$. Analyses further confirm cross-domain robustness ($0.19 \uparrow$ over the best LLM) and stability on long histories. Together, these results support viewing personalized summarization as an *action-biased geometric walk with memory*, offering both interpretability and efficiency.

Enric Adserà, Neil Mallinar, James Simon, Misha Belkin

It is a central challenge in deep learning to understand how neural networks learn representations. A leading approach is the Neural Feature Ansatz (NFA) (Radhakrishnan et al., 2024), a conjectured mechanism for how feature learning occurs. Although the NFA is empirically validated, it is an educated guess and lacks a theoretical basis, and thus it is unclear when it might fail, and how to improve it. In this paper, we take a first-principles approach to understanding why this observation holds, and when it does not. We use first-order optimality conditions to derive the Features at Convergence Theorem (FACT), an alternative to the NFA that (a) obtains greater agreement with learned features at convergence, (b) explains why the NFA holds in most settings, and (c) captures essential feature learning phenomena in neural networks such as grokking behavior in modular arithmetic and phase transitions in learning sparse parities, similarly to the NFA. Thus, our results unify theoretical first-order optimality analyses of neural networks with the empirically-driven NFA literature, and provide a principled alternative that provably and empirically holds at convergence.

Peihao Wang, Ruisi Cai, Zhen Wang, Hongyuan Mei, Qiang Liu, Pan Li, Zhangyang Wang

Scaling inference-time compute for Large Language Models (LLMs) has unlocked unprecedented reasoning capabilities. However, existing inference-time scaling methods typically rely on inefficient and suboptimal discrete search algorithms or trial-and-error prompting to improve the online policy. In this paper, we propose $\nabla$-Reasoner, an iterative generation framework that integrates differentiable optimization over token logits into the decoding loop to refine the policy on the fly. Our core component, Differentiable Textual Optimization (DTO), leverages gradient signals from both the LLM’s likelihood and a reward model to refine textual representations. $\nabla$-Reasoner further incorporates rejection sampling and acceleration design to robustify and speed up decoding. Theoretically, we show that performing inference-time gradient descent in the sample space to maximize reward is dual to aligning an LLM policy via KL-regularized reinforcement learning. Empirically, $\nabla$-Reasoner achieves over 20% accuracy improvement on a challenging mathematical reasoning benchmark, while reducing number of model calls by approximately 10-40% compared to strong baselines. Overall, our work introduces a paradigm shift from zeroth-order search to first-order optimization at test time, offering a cost-effective path to amplify LLM reasoning.

Reinforcement Learning · Function Approximation

Yixian Zhang, Huaze Tang, Changxu Wei, Chao Wang, Wenbo Ding

Reinforcement learning (RL) policies represented in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces (RKHS) offer powerful representational capabilities. While second-order optimization methods like Newton's method demonstrate faster convergence than first-order approaches, current RKHS-based policy optimization remains constrained to first-order techniques. This limitation stems primarily from the intractability of explicitly computing and inverting the infinite-dimensional Hessian operator in RKHS. We introduce Policy Newton in RKHS, the first second-order optimization framework specifically designed for RL policies represented in RKHS. Our approach circumvents direct computation of the inverse Hessian operator by optimizing a cubic regularized auxiliary objective function. Crucially, we leverage the Representer Theorem to transform this infinite-dimensional optimization into an equivalent, computationally tractable finite-dimensional problem whose dimensionality scales with the trajectory data volume. We establish theoretical guarantees proving convergence to a local optimum with a local quadratic convergence rate. Empirical evaluations on a toy financial asset allocation problem validate these theoretical properties, while experiments on standard RL benchmarks demonstrate that Policy Newton in RKHS achieves superior convergence speed and higher episodic rewards compared to established first-order RKHS approaches and parametric second-order methods. Our work bridges a critical gap between non-parametric policy representations and second-order optimization methods in reinforcement learning.

Andrei Semenov, Martin Jaggi, Nikita Doikov

In this work, we develop new optimization algorithms that use approximate second-order information combined with the gradient regularization technique to achieve fast global convergence rates for both convex and non-convex objectives. The key innovation of our analysis is a novel notion called Gradient-Normalized Smoothness, which characterizes the maximum radius of a ball around the current point that yields a good relative approximation of the gradient field. Our theory establishes a natural intrinsic connection between Hessian approximation and the linearization of the gradient. Importantly, Gradient-Normalized Smoothness does not depend on the specific problem class of the objective functions, while effectively translating local information about the gradient field and Hessian approximation into the global behavior of the method. This new concept equips approximate second-order algorithms with universal global convergence guarantees, recovering state-of-the-art rates for functions with Hölder-continuous Hessians and third derivatives, quasi-self-concordant functions, as well as smooth classes in first-order optimization. These rates are achieved automatically and extend to broader classes, such as generalized self-concordant functions. We demonstrate direct applications of our results for global linear rates in logistic regression and softmax problems with approximate Hessians, as well as in non-convex optimization using Fisher and Gauss-Newton approximations.

General Machine Learning · Everything Else

Yu Feng, Nathaniel Weir, Kaj Bostrom, Sam Bayless, Darion Cassel, Sapana Chaudhary, Benjamin Kiesl-Reiter, Huzefa Rangwala

LLMs can perform multi-step reasoning through Chain-of-Thought (CoT), but they cannot reliably verify their own logic. Even when they reach correct answers, the underlying reasoning may be flawed, undermining trust in high-stakes scenarios. To mitigate this issue, we introduce VeriCoT, a neuro-symbolic method that extracts and verifies formal logical arguments from CoT reasoning. VeriCoT formalizes each CoT reasoning step into first-order logic and identifies premises that ground the argument in source context, commonsense knowledge, or prior reasoning steps. The symbolic representation enables automated solvers to verify logical validity while the NL premises allow humans and systems to identify ungrounded or fallacious reasoning steps. Experiments on the ProofWriter, LegalBench-SARA, and BioASQ datasets show VeriCoT effectively identifies flawed reasoning, and serves as a strong predictor of final answer correctness. We also leverage VeriCoT’s verification signal for (1) inference-time self-reflection, (2) supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on VeriCoT-distilled datasets and (3) preference fine-tuning (PFT) with direct preference optimization (DPO) using verification-based pairwise rewards, further improving reasoning validity and accuracy.