Reasoning models have attracted increasing attention for their ability to tackle complex tasks, embodying the System II (slow thinking) paradigm in contrast to System I (fast, intuitive responses). Yet a key question remains: Does slower reasoning necessarily lead to more truthful answers? Our findings suggest otherwise. We conduct the first systematic study of the inverse scaling law in slow-thinking paradigms for multimodal reasoning. We find that when confronted with incomplete or misleading visual inputs, slow-thinking models are more prone to fabricating plausible yet false details to justify untruthful reasoning. To analyze this behavior, we construct a 5,000-sample hierarchical prompt dataset annotated by 50 human participants. The prompts progressively increase in complexity, revealing a consistent pattern: slower reasoning models tend to follow depth-first search (DFS) thinking, persistently exploring flawed premises, while faster chat models favor breadth-first search (BFS) inference, showing greater caution under uncertainty. These findings reveal a critical vulnerability of reasoning models: while effective in structured domains such as math, their DFS-style reasoning becomes fragile when confronted with ambiguous, multimodal inputs.
论文检索
输入标题、作者或关键词，从 9,460 篇学术成果中精准定位
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances large language models (LLMs) by grounding them in external knowledge. However, its application in sensitive domains is limited by privacy risks. Existing private RAG methods typically rely on query-time differential privacy (DP), which requires repeated noise injection and leads to accumulated privacy loss. To address this issue, we propose DP-SynRAG, a framework that uses LLMs to generate differentially private synthetic RAG databases. Unlike prior methods, the synthetic text can be reused once created, thereby avoiding repeated noise injection and additional privacy costs. To preserve essential information for downstream RAG tasks, DP-SynRAG extends private prediction, which instructs LLMs to generate text that mimics subsampled database records in a DP manner. Experiments show that DP-SynRAG achieves superior performance to the state-of-the-art private RAG systems while maintaining a fixed privacy budget, offering a scalable solution for privacy-preserving RAG.
Robustness via Referencing: Defending against Prompt Injection Attacks by Referencing the Executed Instruction
PDF ↗Prompt injection attacks manipulate large language models (LLMs) by misleading them to deviate from the original input instructions and execute maliciously injected instructions, because of their instruction-following capabilities and inability to distinguish between the original input instructions and maliciously injected instructions. Currently, various prompt injection defense methods have been proposed, including prompt-engineering-based approaches and fine-tuning methods. Most of these methods instruct the model to follow the original input instructions, suppressing its inherent tendencies to follow the injected instructions. However, experimental results reveal that suppressing the model’s instruction-following tendencies is challenging. After analyzing successful attack cases, we find that the LLMs can correctly reference the instructions they are executing in some cases. Motivated by this finding, we propose a defense method that leverages LLMs’ instruction-following abilities rather than suppressing them. Our approach prompts LLMs to generate responses that include both the answers and their corresponding instruction references. Based on these references, we filter out answers whose references are not to the original input instructions. We conduct comprehensive experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed method. The results show that our approach outperforms prompt-engineering-based baselines and is comparable to fine-tuning methods, reducing the ASR to nearly 0% in some scenarios. Moreover, our approach has minimal impact on overall utility.
LLM-powered systems require complex multi-step decision-making abilities to solve real-world tasks, yet current planning approaches face a trade-off between the high latency of inference-time search and the limited generalization of supervised fine-tuning. To address this limitation, we introduce SGA-MCTS, a framework that casts LLM planning as non-parametric retrieval. Offline, we leverage Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to explore the solution space and distill high-fidelity trajectories into State-Goal-Action (SGA) atoms. These atoms are de-lexicalized primitives that abstract concrete entities into symbolic slots, preserving reusable causal logic while discarding domain-specific noise. Online, a retrieval-augmented agent employs a hybrid symbolic-semantic mechanism to fetch relevant SGAs and re-ground them into the current context as soft reasoning hints. Empirical results on complex benchmarks demonstrate that this paradigm enables frozen, open-weights models to match the performance of SOTA systems (e.g., GPT-5) without task-specific fine-tuning. By effectively amortizing the heavy computational cost of search, SGA-MCTS achieves System 2 reasoning depth at System 1 inference speeds, rendering autonomous planning both scalable and real-time feasible.
Robust ASR under domain shift is crucial because real-world systems encounter unseen accents and domains with limited labeled data. Although pseudo-labeling offers a practical workaround, it often introduces systematic, accent-specific errors that filtering fails to fix. We ask: How can we correct these recurring biases without target ground truth? We propose a simple parameter-space correction: in a source domain containing both real and pseudo-labeled data, two ASR models are fine-tuned from the same initialization, one on ground-truth labels and the other on pseudo-labels, and their weight difference forms a correction vector that captures pseudo-label biases.When applied to a pseudo-labeled target model, this vector enhances recognition, achieving up to a 35% relative Word Error Rate (WER) reduction on AfriSpeech-200 across ten African accents with the Whisper tiny model.
Current large language models (LLMs) often suffer from hallucination issues, i,e, generating content that appears factual but is actually unreliable. A typical hallucination detection pipeline involves response decomposition (i.e., claim extraction), query generation, evidence collection (i.e., search or retrieval), and claim verification. However, existing methods exhibit limitations in the first two stages, such as context loss during claim extraction and low specificity in query generation, resulting in degraded performance across the hallucination detection pipeline. In this work, we introduce JointCQ, a joint claim-and-query generation framework designed to construct an effective and efficient claim-query generator. Our framework leverages elaborately designed evaluation criteria to filter synthesized training data, and finetunes a language model for joint claim extraction and query generation, providing reliable and informative inputs for downstream search and verification. Experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms previous methods on multiple open-domain QA hallucination detection benchmarks, advancing the goal of more trustworthy and transparent language model systems.
Large Language Models (LLMs) face a fundamental challenge with delayed disambiguation: **How is the meaning of an ambiguous word updated when clarifying context arrives only after it has been processed?** While LLMs possess the latent capacity to resolve such ambiguities—as revealed when a full, non-causal context is provided—their unidirectional architecture prevents immediate updates. We investigate the underlying computational mechanism and show this semantic re-evaluation is deferred to subsequent tokens in a process we term "Deferred Semantic Drift (DSD)". Through targeted analysis of attentional pathways, we find that later tokens actively retrieve context-dependent "informational packets" from the ambiguous word’s value vector to steer the final interpretation. We demonstrate this mechanism in metaphor comprehension and provide causal validation by steering model outputs towards literal or metaphorical meanings via targeted activation interventions. This research uncovers a key computational strategy for meaning construction, offering crucial insights for understanding and guiding the behavior of LLMs.
With the widespread proliferation of the Internet, the spread of fake news has accelerated significantly, evolving from single-text content to multimodal forms that include images and videos. The task of Multimodal Fake News Detection (MFND) takes both text and relevant images as input for fake news identification. However, issues such as image noise and inaccurate focus of visual features often lead to insufficient attention to critical information within images during multimodal fusion. To effectively address these challenges, we propose a covariance matrix-driven image channel allocation method. This method first expands the number of original channel maps, then evaluates the importance of image channels through the covariance matrix and assigns importance scores to the expanded channel maps, thereby redirecting the focus of visual features. Subsequently, we design a multimodal fusion strategy based on a multilayer co-attention mechanism to achieve dynamic fusion across modalities. Finally, a contrastive learning loss is introduced to enhance the alignment between textual and visual modalities. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on three public multimodal fake news detection benchmark datasets.
Multi-Scale Spectral Selection and Entropy-Guided Uncertainty Fusion for Multimodal Rumor Detection
PDF ↗Multimodal content combining textual and visual information poses significant challenges for rumor detection on social media. Compared to traditional spatial domain features, frequency domain features have attracted increasing attention due to their stronger discriminative capabilities. However, existing methods still fall short in capturing cross-modal semantic inconsistencies and often overlook inherent noise in multimodal features, which limits overall detection performance. To address these issues, we propose a novel multimodal rumor detection method based on multi-scale spectral selection and entropy-guided uncertainty fusion. Specifically, we first apply the Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) to image and text features to convert them into the frequency domain. Then, multi-scale convolutional filters are employed to extract fine-grained information across different frequency scales. Next, modality separation is performed to capture both shared and modality-specific features, enabling more effective cross-modal representation learning. Finally, entropy is used to estimate the uncertainty of each prediction branch, calculate confidence scores, and perform adaptive weighted fusion accordingly. Experimental results on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that our method outperforms existing state-of-the-art approaches in multimodal rumor detection, demonstrating stronger detection capability and robustness.
Hybrid-Vector Retrieval for Visually Rich Documents: Combining Single-Vector Efficiency and Multi-Vector Accuracy
PDF ↗Retrieval over visually rich documents is essential for tasks such as legal discovery, scientific search, and enterprise knowledge management. Existing approaches fall into two paradigms: single-vector retrieval, which is efficient but coarse, and multi-vector retrieval, which is accurate but computationally expensive. To address this trade-off, we propose HEAVEN, a plug-and-play two-stage hybrid-vector framework. In the first stage, HEAVEN efficiently retrieves candidate pages using a single-vector method over Visually-Summarized Pages (VS-Pages), which assemble representative visual layouts from multiple pages. In the second stage, it reranks candidates with a multi-vector method while filtering query tokens by linguistic importance to reduce redundant computations. To evaluate retrieval systems under realistic conditions, we also introduce ViMDoc, a benchmark for visually rich, multi-document, and long-document retrieval. Across four benchmarks, HEAVEN attains 99.87% of the Recall@1 performance of multi-vector models on average while reducing per-query computation by 99.82%, achieving efficiency and accuracy. Our code and datasets are available at: https://github.com/juyeonnn/HEAVEN
The rise of reasoning models necessitates large-scale verifiable data, for which programming tasks serve as an ideal source. However, while competitive programming platforms provide abundant problems and solutions, high-quality test cases for verification remain scarce. Existing approaches attempt to synthesize test cases using Large Language Models (LLMs), but rely solely on the model’s intrinsic generation capabilities without external feedback, frequently resulting in insufficiently diverse cases. To address this limitation, we propose a \textbf{Feedback-Driven Iterative Framework} for comprehensive test case construction. Specifically, our method leverages the LLM to generate initial test cases, executes them against known correct and incorrect solutions, and utilizes the failed results as feedback to guide the LLM in refining the test cases toward high fidelity and discriminability. We then apply this method to the CodeContests dataset to construct an optimized high-quality derivative, \textbf{CodeContests-O}. Evaluating against the entire pool of solutions (1.1 \times 10^7 in total), our dataset achieves an average True Positive Rate (TPR) of 89.35% and True Negative Rate (TNR) of 90.30%, significantly outperforming the CodeContests and CodeContests+ by margins of 4.30% and 8.78%, respectively. Furthermore, fine-tuning the Qwen2.5-7B model on CodeContests-O results in a 9.52% improvement on LiveCodeBench (Pass@1). Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework and the quality of CodeContests-O.
Although LLM-based agents are proven to master tool orchestration in scientific fields, particularly chemistry, their single-task performance remains limited by underlying tool constraints. To this end, we propose tool amplification, a novel paradigm that enhances the collective capabilities of specialized tools through optimized, dynamic coordination within individual tasks. Instantiating this paradigm, we introduce ChemAmp, a computationally lightweight framework that dynamically treats chemistry tools (e.g., UniMol2, Chemformer) as composable building-block agents. It constructs task-specialized super-agents that transcend atomic tool constraints with limited data (≤10 samples). Our evaluations across four core chemistry tasks molecular design, molecule captioning, reaction prediction, and property prediction demonstrate that ChemAmp outperforms chemistry-specialized models, generalist LLMs, and agent systems with tool orchestration. Critically, this bottom-up construction strategy enables 94% inference token cost reductions versus vanilla multi-agent systems.
Reranking is fundamental to information retrieval and retrieval-augmented generation, with recent Large Language Models (LLMs) significantly advancing reranking quality. Most current works rely on large-scale LLMs (>7B parameters), presenting high computational costs. Small Language Models (SLMs) offer a promising alternative because of computational efficiency. However, our preliminary quantitative analysis reveals key limitations of SLMs: their representation space is narrow, leading to reduced expressiveness, and they struggle with understanding task prompts without fine-tuning. To address these issues, we introduce a novel two-stage training approach, ProRank, for SLM-based document reranking. We propose using reinforcement learning to improve the understanding of task prompts. Additionally, we introduce fine-grained score learning to enhance representation expressiveness and further improve document reranking quality. Extensive experiments suggest that ProRank consistently outperforms both the most advanced open-source and proprietary reranking models. Notably, our ProRank even surpasses powerful LLM reranking models on the BEIR benchmark, establishing that properly trained SLMs can achieve superior document reranking performance while maintaining computational efficiency.
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong reasoning capabilities but typically require expensive post-training to reach high performance. Recent test-time alignment methods offer a lightweight alternative, but have been explored mainly for preference alignment rather than reasoning. To bridge this gap, we propose Token-level Adaptive Routing (TARo), which steers frozen LLMs toward structured reasoning entirely at inference time. Specifically, we first train reward models on step-wise mathematical traces to capture fine-grained logical consistency signals, then introduce a learnable token-level router that automatically controls the guidance of the reward model to the base model. Extensive experiments show that TARo significantly improves reasoning performance by up to +22.4% over base model and +8.4% over existing token-level test-time alignment methods, while also boosting out-of-distribution clinical reasoning (MedXpertQA) and instruction following (AlpacaEval). Furthermore, TARo also generalizes from small to large backbones without retraining, extending test-time alignment from preference optimization to robust, cross-domain reasoning.
Large language models (LLMs) seem to offer an easy path to interpretability: just ask them to explain their answers. Yet the features driving an answer often differ from those emphasized in its explanation, meaning post-hoc rationales can misrepresent what actually shaped the model’s output. We quantify this gap by comparing the feature-importance distributions of answers and their explanations. Prior analyses reveal such discrepancies, but large-scale study has been limited by the high computational cost of attribution methods. To address this, we introduce the Post-hoc Self-Consistency Bank (PSCB), a large-scale benchmark linking model decisions with diverse explanations and attribution vectors across datasets, methods, and model families. Using PSCB, we find that Spearman rank correlation provides a more reliable signal of alignment than cosine similarity. Building on this insight, we apply Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to attribution-based preference data, improving alignment without degrading task accuracy, and show that standard supervised fine-tuning on the same data fails to achieve comparable gains. These improvements generalize robustly across domains, paving the way toward scalable and faithful alignment between LLM decisions and their natural language explanations.
Due to the prevalence of large language models (LLMs), key-value (KV) cache reduction for LLM inference has received remarkable attention. Among numerous works that have been proposed in recent years, layer-wise token pruning approaches, which select a subset of tokens at particular layers to retain in KV cache and prune others, are one of the most popular schemes. They primarily adopt a set of pre-defined layers, at which tokens are selected. Such design is inflexible in the sense that the accuracy significantly varies across tasks and deteriorates in harder tasks such as KV retrieval. In this paper, we propose ASL, a training-free method that adaptively chooses the selection layer for KV cache reduction, exploiting the variance of token ranks ordered by attention score. The proposed method balances the performance across different tasks while meeting the user-specified KV budget requirement. ASL operates during the prefilling stage and can be jointly used with existing KV cache reduction methods such as SnapKV to optimize the decoding stage. By evaluations on the InfiniteBench, RULER, and NIAH benchmarks, we show that ASL, equipped with one-shot token selection, adaptively trades inference speed for accuracy, outperforming state-of-the-art layer-wise token pruning methods in difficult tasks.
Do reasoning models have "Aha!" moments?Prior work suggests that models like DeepSeek-R1-Zero undergo sudden mid-trace realizations that lead to accurate outputs, implying an intrinsic capacity for self-correction. Yet, it remains unclear whether such intrinsic shifts in reasoning strategy actually improve performance.Here, we study mid-reasoning shifts and instrument training runs to detect them. Our analysis spans 1M+ reasoning traces, hundreds of training checkpoints, three reasoning domains, and multiple decoding temperatures and model architectures.We find that reasoning shifts are rare, do not become more frequent with training, and seldom improve accuracy, indicating that they do not correspond to prior perceptions of model insight. However, their effect varies with model uncertainty. Building on this finding, we show that artificially triggering extrinsic shifts under high entropy reliably improves accuracy. Our results show that mid-reasoning shifts are symptoms of unstable inference behavior rather than an intrinsic mechanism for self-correction.
Instruction tuning is crucial for optimizing Large Language Models (LLMs), as the quality and diversity of instructional data significantly influence model performance. This naturally underscores the importance of an effective and efficient data selection strategy. However, recent mainstream data selection methods typically rely on LLMs to score instruction quality—taking advantage of their capabilities, but at the cost of high computational overhead and reduced data diversity. To address these limitations, in this paper, we propose MergeIT, a novel LLM-based Merging strategy for better Instruction Tuning that shifts the focus from selection to synthesis. MergeIT consists of two stages: first, topic-aware filtering clusters and refines the dataset, preserving diversity while eliminating redundancy without relying on LLM-based scoring, significantly reducing time and computational cost. Second, LLM-based merging synthesizes semantically similar instructions into more informative and compact training data, enhancing data richness while further reducing the size of the dataset. Experimental results demonstrate that MergeIT enables efficient, diverse, and scalable instruction selection and synthesis, establishing LLM-based merging as a promising alternative to prior scoring-based selection methods for instruction tuning.
High-quality and diverse multimodal data are essential for improving vision–language models (VLMs), yet existing datasets often contain noisy, redundant, and poorly aligned samples. To address these problems, data filtering is commonly used to enhance the efficiency and performance of multimodal learning, but it introduces extra computational cost because filtering models are usually trained on the same data they are meant to screen. To reduce this cost, we study DOSE, which explores whether off-the-shelf pretrained models that have never seen the target data can be used to select training samples for larger and stronger multimodal models without any task-specific training. Even without fine-tuning, these models can effectively assess text quality and image–text alignment to guide data selection. Based on this, we build a joint quality–alignment distribution and apply adaptive weighted sampling to select informative samples while maintaining long-tail diversity. This approach greatly enhances data diversity and enables models trained on DOSE-filtered data to achieve comparable or even better results than those trained on the full dataset in standard VQA and math benchmarks. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness, efficiency, and scalability of our method.
The ubiquity of text-attributed graph data has highlighted the need for graph learning models with exceptional generalization across diverse textual and structural contexts. Current approaches struggle to extract generalizable insights from heterogeneous graph data, requiring extensive fine-tuning and limiting versatility across domains. In this work, we propose AnyGraph, a unified graph foundation model designed to handle key challenges: i) Structure Heterogenity - addressing distribution shift in graph structural patterns; ii) Feature Heterogenity - handling diverse textual representations; iii) Fast Adaptation - efficiently adapting to new graph-text domains. We build AnyGraph upon a Graph Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture with a lightweight expert routing mechanism that effectively manages cross-domain distribution shift. Extensive experiments on 38 diverse datasets demonstrate AnyGraph’s strong zero-shot performance across domains with significant distribution shift, validating its fast adaptation ability and scaling law emergence. Our model is open-sourced and available at: https://github.com/HKUDS/AnyGraph.