论文检索

Sijie Mai, Shiqin Han

Multimodal affective computing aims to predict humans’ sentiment, emotion, intention, and opinion using language, acoustic, and visual modalities. However, current models often learn spurious correlations that harm generalization under distribution shifts or noisy modalities. To address this, we propose a causal modality-invariant representation (CmIR) learning framework for robust multimodal learning. At its core, we introduce a theoretically grounded disentanglement method that separates each modality into ‘causal invariant representation’ and ‘environment-specific spurious representation’ from a causal inference perspective. CmIR ensures that the learned invariant representations retain stable predictive relationships with labels across different environments while preserving sufficient information from the raw inputs via invariance constraint, mutual information constraint, and reconstruction constraint. Experiments across multiple multimodal benchmarks demonstrate that CmIR achieves state-of-the-art performance. CmIR particularly excels on out-of-distribution data and noisy data, confirming its robustness and generalizability.

Delip Rao, Weiqiu You, Eric Wong, Chris Callison-Burch

We introduce NSF-SciFy, a comprehensive dataset of scientific claims and investigation proposals extracted from National Science Foundation award abstracts. While previous scientific claim verification datasets have been limited in size and scope, NSF-SciFy represents a significant advance with 2.8 million claims from 400,000 abstracts spanning all science and mathematics disciplines. We present two focused subsets: NSF-SciFy-MatSci with 114,000 claims from materials science awards, and NSF-SciFy-20K with 135,000 claims across five NSF directorates. Using zero-shot prompting, we develop a scalable approach for joint extraction of scientific claims and investigation proposals. We demonstrate the dataset’s utility through three downstream tasks: non-technical abstract generation, claim extraction, and investigation proposal extraction. Fine-tuning language models on our dataset yields substantial improvements, with relative gains often exceeding 100%, particularly for claim and proposal extraction tasks. Our error analysis reveals that extracted claims exhibit high precision but lower recall, suggesting opportunities for further methodological refinement. NSF-SciFy enables new research directions in large-scale claim verification, scientific discovery tracking, and meta-scientific analysis.

Yiyang Gu, Junwei Yang, Junyu Luo, Ye Yuan, Bin Feng, Yingce Xia, Shufang Xie, Kaili Liu, Bohan Wu, Qi Shi 等

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to scientific research, yet existing evaluations often fail to reflect the fine-grained capabilities required in practice. Most benchmarks are manually curated or domain-generic, limiting scalability and alignment with real scientific use cases. In this paper, we propose a new framework named SciCustom to address the problem. It enables the custom construction of benchmarks from large-scale scientific data to evaluate application-specific scientific capabilities in LLMs. SciCustom first organizes scientific knowledge into ontology-grounded knowledge units with controlled granularity and trains a tagger to map large-scale data instances into this knowledge space. Given a custom requirement, relevant knowledge units are identified via voting-based multi-model consensus. These units enable relevance-aware benchmark retrieval via binary search, followed by proxy subset selection and data-grounded benchmark generation for efficient evaluation. Experiments in chemistry and healthcare demonstrate that SciCustom reveals fine-grained differences in LLM scientific capabilities that standard benchmarks overlook, while requiring neither expert annotation nor synthetic question generation. This work provides a scalable and application-aware foundation for benchmarking scientific capabilities in LLMs.

Chang Hao Lai, Rui Zhao, Xuewen Zhong, Jinsong Su, Yidong Chen

Sign language translation (SLT) converts continuous sign videos into spoken-language text, yet it remains challenging due to the intrinsic modality mismatch between visual signs and written text, particularly in gloss-free settings. Recent SLT systems increasingly adopt CLIP-like Vision-Language pretraining (VLP) for cross-modal alignment, but the random in-batch contrast provides few, batch-dependent negatives and may mislabel semantically similar (or even identical) pairs as negatives, introducing noisy and potentially inconsistent alignment supervision.In this work, we first conduct a preliminary trajectory-based analysis that tracks negative video-text similarity over training. The results show that only a small subset of negatives exhibits the desired behavior of being consistently pushed away, while the remaining negatives display heterogeneous and often non-decreasing similarity dynamics, suggesting that random in-batch negatives are frequently uninformative for effective alignment.Inspired by this, we propose Selective Contrastive Learning for SLT (SCL-SLT) with a Pair Selection (PS) strategy. PS scores candidate negatives using similarity dynamics from reference checkpoints and constructs mini-batches via a curriculum that progressively emphasizes more challenging negatives, thereby strengthening contrastive supervision while reducing the influence of noisy or semantically invalid negatives.

Shinwoo Park, Hyejin Park, Hyeseon An, Yo-Sub Han

As large language models (LLMs) continue to advance rapidly, reliable governance tools have become critical. Publicly verifiable watermarking is particularly essential for fostering a trustworthy AI ecosystem. A central challenge persists: balancing text quality against detection robustness. Recent studies have sought to navigate this trade-off by leveraging signals from model output distributions (e.g., token-level entropy); however, their reliance on these model-specific signals presents a significant barrier to public verification, as the detection process requires access to the logits of the underlying model. We introduce STELA, a novel framework that aligns watermark strength with the linguistic degrees of freedom inherent in language. STELA dynamically modulates the signal using part-of-speech (POS) n-gram–modeled linguistic indeterminacy, weakening it in grammatically constrained contexts to preserve quality and strengthening it in contexts with greater linguistic flexibility to enhance detectability. Our detector operates without access to any model logits, thus facilitating publicly verifiable detection. Through extensive experiments on typologically diverse languages—analytic English, isolating Chinese, and agglutinative Korean—we show that STELA surpasses prior methods in detection robustness. Our code is available at https://github.com/Shinwoo-Park/stela_watermark.

Marek Suppa, Andrej Ridzik, Daniel Hládek, Natália Kňažeková, Viktória Ondrejová

We introduce SkMTEB, the first comprehensive MTEB-style text embedding benchmark for Slovak, a low-resource West Slavic language, comprising 31 datasets across 7 task types—nearly 4\times the depth of existing multilingual benchmark coverage for Slovak. Our evaluation of 31 embedding models reveals that large instruction-tuned multilingual models achieve the strongest performance, while existing Slovak-specific models trained for NLU tasks transfer poorly to embedding tasks. To address the need for efficient, locally-deployable Slovak embeddings, we develop e5-sk-small (45M parameters) and e5-sk-large (365M) by applying vocabulary trimming and fine-tuning to Multilingual E5 models. Despite size reductions of up to 62%, our open-source models achieve competitive performance with proprietary APIs while remaining locally deployable for semantic search and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). We release the benchmark, models, datasets, and code openly, hoping our approach offers a replicable path for other under-resourced languages.

Prajwal Vijay Kajare, Priyanshu Priya, Bikash Santra, Asif Ekbal

Emotion plays a pivotal role in shaping negotiation outcomes, influencing trust, cooperation, and long-term relationships. Developing negotiation dialog systems that can recognize and respond strategically to emotions is therefore essential to create more effective human-centered interactions. Beyond generating emotionally appropriate responses, interpretability - understanding how a system generates a particular emotion-aware response, is critical for fostering reliability and building rapport. Driven by these aspects, in this work, we introduce PRISMA, an interpretable emotionally intelligent negotiation dialogue system targeting two application domains, viz. job interviews and resource allocation. To enable interpretability, we propose an Emotion-aware Negotiation Strategy-informed Chain-of-Thought (ENS-CoT) reasoning mechanism, which mimics human negotiation by perceiving, understanding, using, and managing emotions. Leveraging ENS-CoT, we curate two new datasets: JobNego (for job interview negotiation) and ResNego (for resource allocation negotiation). We then leverage these datasets to develop PRISMA by augmenting self-training with Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), guiding agents toward more accurate, interpretable, and emotionally appropriate negotiation responses. Automatic and human evaluations on JobNego and ResNego datasets demonstrate that PRISMA substantially enhances the interpretability and generates appropriate emotion-aware responses, while improving overall negotiation effectiveness.

Kyubyung Chae, Jewon Yeom, Jeongjae Park, Seunghyun Bae, Ijun Jang, Hyunbin Jin, Jinkwan Jang, Taesup Kim

Legal QA benchmarks have predominantly focused on case law, overlooking the unique challenges of statute-centric regulatory reasoning. In statutory domains, relevant evidence is distributed across hierarchically linked documents, creating a statutory retrieval gap where conventional retrievers fail and models often hallucinate under incomplete context. We introduce SearchFireSafety, a structure- and safety-aware benchmark for statute-centric legal QA. Instantiated on fire-safety regulations as a representative case, the benchmark evaluates whether models can retrieve hierarchically fragmented evidence and safely abstain when statutory context is insufficient. SearchFireSafety adopts a dual-track evaluation framework combining real-world questions that require citation-aware retrieval and synthetic partial-context scenarios that stress-test hallucination and refusal behavior. Experiments across multiple large language models show that graph-guided retrieval substantially improves performance, but also reveal a critical safety trade-off: domain-adapted models are more likely to hallucinate when key statutory evidence is missing. Our findings highlight the need for benchmarks that jointly evaluate hierarchical retrieval and model safety in statute-centric regulatory settings.

Yixuan Jiang, Tiancheng Hu, Jose Hernandez-Orallo, David Stillwell, Luning Sun

Understanding how discussion dynamics shape team creativity has been limited by the difficulty of measuring process at scale. We introduce Trace, a corpus of 309 group discussions from 103 teams (460 participants) across six creative problem-solving tasks. The dataset follows an input-process-output framework, integrating team composition (demographics, personalities), full discussion transcripts, and creativity outcomes. Using sentence embeddings and factor analysis, we identify four interpretable discussion dimensions: Coherence, Exploration, Convergence, and Participation. Analysis reveals a depth-breadth trade-off: coherent idea development inversely relates to semantic exploration. Larger teams explore more broadly but converge less effectively while team diversity shapes participation patterns more than discussion content. Novelty and usefulness in the creativity outcomes follow distinct pathways: Exploration and Convergence predict novelty, whereas Coherence predicts usefulness. These findings ground our understanding of how teams talk their way to creative solutions and provide guidance for designing multiagent systems.

Jingyi Sun, Greta Warren, Irina Shklovski, Isabelle Augenstein

Human–AI collaboration in knowledge-intensive tasks such as fact-checking requires understanding model uncertainty in multi-document reasoning amid conflicting/agreeing evidence. Yet, existing methods only express uncertainty as numbers or hedges without revealing which evidence conflicts cause the uncertainty, leaving users unable to resolve disagreements. We present CLUE (Conflict- Agreement-aware Language-model Uncertainty Explanations), a plug-and-play white-box framework that, to our knowledge, is the first to generate natural-language explanations of model uncertainty grounded in conflicting/agreeing evidence. CLUE (i) identifies span-level claim–evidence and inter-evidence relations that signal conflict or agreement without supervision, and (ii) uses these relations to steer explanation generation, articulating how they drive the model’s uncertainty. Across three language models and two fact-checking datasets, CLUE produces explanations that more faithfully track model uncertainty and better align with the model’s fact-checking decisions than span-agnostic explanation prompting; human raters also judge them more helpful, more informative, less redundant, and more logically consistent with the input. By explicitly tying uncertainty to evidence conflicts and agreements, CLUE supports practical fact-checking and other tasks that require reasoning over complex, conflicting information.

Vipul Kumar Rathore, Malik Hammad Faisal, Parag Singla, Mausam

Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction (DSRE) remains a long-standing challenge in NLP, where models must learn from noisy bag-level annotations while making sentence-level predictions. While existing state-of-the-art (SoTA) DSRE models rely on task-specific training, their integration with in-context learning (ICL) using large language models (LLMs) remains underexplored. A key challenge is that the LLM may not learn relation semantics correctly, due to noisy annotation.In response, we propose HYDRE – HYbrid Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction framework. It first uses a trained DSRE model to identify the top-k candidate relations for a given test sentence, then uses a novel dynamic exemplar retrieval strategy that extracts reliable, sentence-level exemplars from training data, which are then provided in LLM prompt for outputting the final relation(s).We further extend HYDRE to cross-lingual settings for RE in low-resource languages. Using available English DSRE training data, we evaluate all methods on English as well as a newly curated benchmark covering four diverse low-resource Indic languages - Oriya, Santali, Manipuri, and Tulu. HYDRE achieves up to 20 F1 point gains in English and, on average, 17 F1 points on Indic languages over prior SoTA DSRE models and naive prompting baselines. Detailed ablations exhibit HYDRE’s efficacy compared to other prompting strategies.

Zijing Wang, Xingle Xu, YongKang Liu, Yiqun Zhang, Peiqin Lin, Shi Feng, Daling Wang, Xiaocui Yang, Hinrich Schuetze

Model merging dramatically reduces storage and computational resources by combining multiple expert models into a single multi-task model. However, existing methods struggle to maintain performance gains as the number of merged models increases. In this paper, we investigate the key obstacles that limit the scalability of model merging. We prove that the limited effective parameter space imposes a strict constraint on the number of models that can be successfully merged. Through Gaussian Width analysis, we show that marginal benefits diminish according to a strictly concave function as more models are merged. Using Approximate Kinematics Theory, we further prove the existence of a unique optimal threshold beyond which additional models yield negligible improvements. To address this limitation, we propose a straightforward Reparameterized Heavy-Tailed method to extend the merged model’s coverage and enhance performance. Empirical results on 19 benchmarks, including both knowledge-intensive and general-purpose tasks, validate our theoretical analysis. We believe that these results spark further research beyond the current scope of model merging.

Le Zhou, Feng Yao, Fengcai Qiao, Bo Xu, Fangyuan Wang, Boyan Xu

Recent advances in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) trained with Long Chain-of-Thought have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in code generation and mathematical reasoning. However, their potential in multi-turn Text-to-SQL tasks remains largely underexplored. Existing approaches typically rely on unstable API-based inference or require expensive fine-tuning on small-scale models. In this work, we present Rose-SQL, a training-free framework that leverages small-scale LRMs through in-context learning to enable accurate context-dependent parsing. We introduce the Role-State, a fine-grained representation that bridges the structural gap between schema linking and SQL generation by serving as a structural blueprint. To handle conversational dependencies, Rose-SQL traces the evolution of Role-State through historical context via structural isomorphism checks, guiding the model to infer the possible SQL composition for the current question through verified interaction trajectories. Experiments on the SParC and CoSQL benchmarks show that, within the Qwen3 series, Rose-SQL outperforms in-context learning baselines at the 4B scale and substantially surpasses state-of-the-art fine-tuned models at the 8B and 14B scales, while showing consistent gains on additional reasoning backbones.

Ada Chen, Yongjiang Wu, Junyuan Zhang, Jingyu Xiao, Shu Yang, Jen-tse Huang, Kun Wang, Wenxuan Wang, Shuai Wang

Recently, AI-driven interactions with computing devices have advanced from basic prototype tools to sophisticated, LLM-based systems that emulate human-like operations in graphical user interfaces. We are now witnessing the emergence of Computer-Using Agents (CUAs), capable of autonomously performing tasks such as navigating desktop applications, web pages, and mobile apps. However, as these agents grow in capability, they also introduce novel safety and security risks. Vulnerabilities in LLM-driven reasoning, with the added complexity of integrating multiple software components and multimodal inputs, further complicate the security landscape. In this paper, we present a systematization of knowledge on the safety and security threats of CUAs. We conduct a comprehensive literature review and distill our findings along four research objectives: (i) define the CUA that suits safety analysis; (ii) categorize current safety threats among CUAs; (iii) propose a comprehensive taxonomy of existing defensive strategies; (iv) summarize prevailing benchmarks, datasets, and evaluation metrics used to assess the safety and performance of CUAs. Building on these insights, our work provides future researchers with a structured foundation for exploring unexplored vulnerabilities and offers practitioners actionable guidance in designing and deploying secure Computer-Using Agents.

Shengjie Li, Vincent Ng

Despite the recent progress made in cross-prompt essay scoring, there is little analysis of what makes a state-of-the-art cross-prompt scorer work well. To this end, we present an empirical analysis of how the key components of a cross-prompt scorer interact with each other and impact its overall performance. In addition, we examine for the first time the application of transductive learning to cross-prompt scoring, which represents an important starting point for providing a practical way to improve cross-prompt scorers for use in the rarely-studied classroom setting without the need for additional labeled training data.

Yejin Lee, Hyeseon An, Yo-Sub Han

Hate speech remains prevalent in human society and continues to evolve in its forms and expressions. Modern advancements in the internet and online anonymity accelerate its rapid spread and complicate its detection. However, hate speech datasets exhibit diverse characteristics primarily because they are constructed from different sources and platforms, each reflecting different linguistic styles and social contexts. Despite this diversity, prior studies on hate speech detection often rely on fixed methodologies without adapting to data-specific features. We introduce RV-HATE, a detection framework designed to account for the dataset-specific characteristics of each hate speech dataset. RV-HATE consists of multiple specialized modules, where each module focuses on distinct linguistic or contextual features of hate speech. The framework employs reinforcement learning to optimize weights that determine the contribution of each module for a given dataset. A voting mechanism then aggregates the module outputs to produce the final decision. RV-HATE offers two primary advantages: (1) it improves detection accuracy by tailoring the detection process to dataset-specific attributes, and (2) it also provides interpretable insights into the distinctive features of each dataset. Consequently, our approach effectively addresses implicit hate speech and achieves superior performance compared to conventional static methods.

Cui Yakun, Peng Qi, Fushuo Huo, Hang Du, Weijie Shi, Juntao Dai, Zhenghao Zhu, Sirui Han

The advent of multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) has greatly advanced research on video fake news detection (VFND) tasks. Existing benchmarks typically focus on the detection accuracy, while failing to provide fine-grained assessments for the entire detection process. To address these limitations, we introduce POVFNDB (Process-oriented Video Fake News Detection Benchmark), a process-oriented benchmark comprising 10 tasks designed to systematically evaluate MLLMs’ perception, understanding, and reasoning capabilities in VFND. This benchmark contains 36,240 human-annotated question-answer (QA) in structured or open-ended formats, spanning 15 distinct evaluation dimensions that characterize different aspects of the video fake news detection process.Using POVFNDB, we conduct comprehensive evaluations on both proprietary and open-source MLLMs. Moreover, We fine-tune Qwen2.5VL-7B-Instruct on a reasoning dataset generated by our proposed POVFND-CoT, a chain-of-thought method that utilizes rationales from evaluation results and rationale validation. The resulting model achieves sota performance on VFND.

Minghe Shen, Zhuo Zhi, Chonghan Liu, Shuo Xing, Zhengzhong Tu, Che Liu

Recent studies posit that Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) primarily amplifies behaviors inherent to the pre-training distribution rather than inducing new capabilities, but these insights are predominantly limited to language-only domains, leaving the dynamics of visual-centric spatial reasoning under-explored. To examine the impact of RLVR on the capability boundaries of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), we introduce Ariadne, a controlled framework based on synthetic maze navigation where the reasoning difficulty is precisely regulated by path length and the number of turns. We demonstrate that applying RLVR extends the spatial reasoning boundary, achieving success on problems where the base policy VLM consistently attains 0% accuracy despite increasing pass@k sampling budgets, indicating that the optimized policy successfully navigates search spaces that were effectively unreachable by the base distribution. Furthermore, despite being trained exclusively on synthetic mazes, we evaluate the model on two real-world navigation benchmarks (MapBench and ReasonMap) in a zero-shot setting. The observed improvements in these out-of-domain tasks suggest genuine spatial reasoning capability expansion rather than mere sampling efficiency. Our code is available at: https://github.com/MingheShen/Ariadne

Sugyeong Eo, Heuiseok Lim

Although large language models (LLMs) have shown considerable progress in pragmatic language understanding, prior research has focused mainly on their comprehension of verbal behavior. Nonetheless, non-verbal behavior remains a fundamental component of human communication, especially when deliberately utilized in isolation to convey indirect meanings. In this work, we present the first systematic evaluation of LLMs’ ability to infer pragmatic meaning in dialogue consisting solely of non-verbal responses. We explore three research questions: (1) Can LLMs recognize indirect intent conveyed through non-verbal responses? (2) When and how do LLMs fail to capture non-verbal intent? (3) How can we improve LLMs’ ability to interpret non-verbal intent?. Through the evaluation, we observe that LLMs struggle to infer underlying meaning from non-verbal responses, with accuracy dropping by up to 60% points compared to verbal ones. Further extensive analysis reveals a behavioral pattern in LLMs’ interpretations of non-verbal behavior and demonstrates that in-context learning facilitates pragmatic inference.

Yingjie Xue, Xingyou Xia, Jun Zhang, Yunbo Cao, Dengpan Ye, Guotong Geng, Fei Li

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely applied in various domains such as education and healthcare, making safety assurance crucial. Jailbreak attacks, a method used in red-teaming, can help evaluate and improve the defensive strategies of LLMs. However, existing jailbreak methods often overlook the semantic differences across categories of harmful questions, leading to inconsistent success rates and reduced overall attack effectiveness. We propose the first category-aware jailbreak framework, SHARP, which incorporates the semantic category of harmful questions into prompt generation. Trained on a verified jailbreak dataset, SHARP enables the model to learn category-specific semantic features and adaptively generate prompts that bypass safety mechanisms. The method combines two-stage LoRA fine-tuning, and DPO-based reinforcement learning to optimize both attack success and category alignment. Experiments show that SHARP significantly improves attack success rates and achieves better cross-category robustness compared to the state-of-the-art (SOTA) baselines, providing an efficient and scalable tool for evaluating LLM safety.