Language change both reflects and shapes social processes, and the semantic evolution of foundational concepts provides a measurable trace of historical and social transformation. Despite recent advances in diachronic semantics and discourse analysis, existing computational approaches often (i) concentrate on a single concept or a single corpus, making findings difficult to compare across heterogeneous sources, and (ii) remain confined to surface lexical evidence, offering insufficient computational and interpretive granularity when concepts are expressed implicitly. We propose HistLens, a unified, SAE-based framework for multi-concept, multi-corpus conceptual-history analysis. The framework decomposes concept representations into interpretable features and tracks their activation dynamics over time and across sources, yielding comparable conceptual trajectories within a shared coordinate system. Experiments on long-span press corpora show that HistLens supports cross-concept, cross-corpus computation of patterns of idea evolution and enables implicit concept computation. By bridging conceptual modeling with interpretive needs, HistLens broadens the analytical perspectives and methodological repertoire available to social science and the humanities for diachronic text analysis.
论文检索
输入标题、作者或关键词，从 2,072 篇学术成果中精准定位
Mathematical Proof as a Litmus Test: Revealing Failure Modes of Advanced Large Reasoning Models
PDF ↗Large reasoning models ( e.g., R1, o3) have demonstrated remarkable mathematical problem-solving abilities. However, the high reported accuracy of these advanced models on popular datasets and reliance on purely numerical evaluation often mask their true reasoning shortcomings. To address this, we propose leveraging the inherent rigor and methodological complexity of mathematical proofs as a diagnostic tool to expose these hidden failures. Specifically, we introduce the RFMDataset (Reveal Failure Modes), a collection of 200 diverse mathematical proof problems to thoroughly evaluate the performance of advanced models. Our in-depth analysis of their failures uncovers 10 fine-grained error types, which shows fundamental limitations in current large reasoning models: 1) Large reasoning models still have limited capability in generating entirely correct mathematical proofs, with some models solving less than 20% of problems and even making mistakes on fundamental ones; 2) models exhibit a diverse spectrum of reasoning failures, prominently demonstrating the lack of guarantees for the correctness and rigor intermediate reasoning steps; and 3) models show hallucination and incompleteness during the reasoning process. Our findings also reveal that directly prompting models to self-reflect on specific failure modes is insufficient to resolve the current logical dilemmas, necessitating domain knowledge and formal verification.
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in general multi-modal understanding; yet they struggle to efficiently acquire continually evolving domain-specific skills. Conventional approaches to enhancing VLM capabilities, such as Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), require extensive dataset curation and substantial computational resources. Model merging has emerged as an efficient alternative that enables the transfer of domain-specific expertise from Large Language Models (LLMs) to VLMs without incurring additional training data requirements or significant computational overhead. Unlike conventional merging of homogeneous LLMs, which mainly aggregates existing capabilities, cross-modal skill injection aims to induce emergent cross-modal capabilities by integrating a domain-expert LLM into a VLM. However, existing research lacks a systematic analysis of the applicability and methodology of cross-modal skill injection. In this study, we investigate cross-modal skill injection across three main aspects: scenarios, methods, and hyperparameters. For scenarios, we find that cross-modal skill injection generally performs well in instruction-following and cross-lingual settings, yet struggles with mathematical reasoning. For methods, we find that classic approaches such as TA and DARE consistently achieve superior performance over alternative merging methods. We also provide a systematic and quantitative analysis of the hyperparameter tuning that these classic methods critically depend on.
Table Question Answering in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Tasks, Methods, and Evaluation
PDF ↗Table Question Answering (TQA) aims to answer natural language questions using tabular data, often accompanied by additional contexts, such as passages. The task spans diverse settings, varying in table representation, question/answer complexity, modality involved, and domain. While recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have driven substantial progress for TQA, the field still lacks a systematic organization and understanding of task formulations, core challenges, and methodological trends, particularly in light of emerging research directions, such as reinforcement learning. This survey addresses this gap by providing a comprehensive and structured overview of TQA research using LLMs. We introduce various task setups and summarize available benchmarks based on task features. We categorize current modeling strategies according to the challenges they target, and analyze their strengths and limitations. Furthermore, we highlight underexplored but timely topics that have not been systematically covered in prior surveys. By unifying disparate research threads and identifying open problems, our survey offers a consolidated foundation for the TQA community, enabling a deeper understanding of the state of the art and guiding future developments in this rapidly evolving area.
Beyond Single-View Detection: A Dual-Space Reasoning Framework for Interpretable Harmful Meme Understanding
PDF ↗The identification of harmful memes extends beyond a mere classification task, encompassing challenges related to multi-perspective semantic comprehension and hierarchical reasoning. Prevailing approaches predominantly depend on modal alignment or black-box classifiers, which fail to capture implicit biases and lack interpretability. In this study, we propose BPDMoE-Hate, a novel framework grounded in dual-space mixture-of-experts, which innovatively conceptualizes harmful meme detection as an integrated process of “viewpoint decoupling and hierarchical fusion”. Our approach generates adversarial binary perspectives via Visual-Language Models (VLMs) and incorporates an adaptive viewpoint gating to facilitate viewpoint selection, thereby enabling the model to autonomously discern implicit semantic inclinations. Moreover, we propose the Hyperbolic-Euclidean space expert to effectively capture the hierarchical structural relationships and semantic correlations between multimodal and viewpoint features, thereby enabling interpretable reasoning at the geometric representation level. Empirical evaluations conducted on three mainstream datasets demonstrate that BPDMoE-Hate not only substantially surpasses existing methodologies in performance but also offers visual explanations for viewpoint selection and hierarchical structuring, thereby advancing the field of interpretable multimodal content analysis.
Deep Research Agents generate analyst-grade reports, yet evaluating them remains challenging due to the absence of a single ground truth and the multidimensional nature of research quality. Recent benchmarks propose distinct methodologies, yet they suffer from the Mirage of Synthesis, where strong surface-level fluency and citation alignment can obscure underlying factual and reasoning defects. We characterize this gap by introducing a taxonomy across four verticals that exposes a critical capability mismatch: static evaluators inherently lack the tool-use capabilities required to assess temporal validity and factual correctness. To address this, we propose **DREAM** (Deep Research Evaluation with Agentic Metrics), a framework that instantiates the principle of capability parity by making evaluation itself agentic. DREAM structures assessment through an evaluation protocol combining query-agnostic metrics with adaptive metrics generated by a tool-calling agent, enabling temporally aware coverage, grounded verification, and systematic reasoning probes. Controlled evaluations demonstrate DREAM is significantly more sensitive to factual and temporal decay than existing benchmarks, offering a scalable, reference-free evaluation paradigm.
Individual investors are significantly outnumbered and disadvantaged in financial markets, overwhelmed by abundant information and lacking professional analysis. Equity research reports stand out as crucial resources, offering valuable insights. By leveraging these reports, large language models (LLMs) can enhance investors’ decision-making capabilities and strengthen financial analysis. However, two key challenges limit their effectiveness: (1) the rapid evolution of market events often outpaces the slow update cycles of existing knowledge bases, (2) the long-form and unstructured nature of financial reports further hinders timely and context-aware integration by LLMs. To address these challenges, we tackle both data and methodological aspects. First, we introduce the Event-Enhanced Automated Construction of Financial Knowledge Graph (FinKario), a dataset comprising over 305,360 entities, 210,328 relational triples, and 19 distinct relation types. FinKario automatically integrates real-time company fundamentals and market events through prompt-driven extraction guided by professional institutional templates, providing structured and accessible financial insights for LLMs. Additionally, we propose a Two-Stage, Graph-Based retrieval strategy (FinKario-RAG), optimizing the retrieval of evolving, large-scale financial knowledge to ensure efficient and precise data access. Extensive experiments show that FinKario with FinKario-RAG achieves superior stock trend prediction accuracy, outperforming financial LLMs by 18.81% and institutional strategies by 17.85% on average in backtesting. [Our code is available at <https://github.com/Jackson906E/FinKario>.]
Hausa texts are often characterized by writing anomalies such as incorrect character substitutions and spacing errors, which sometimes hinder natural language processing (NLP) applications. This paper presents an approach to automatically correct the anomalies by finetuning transformer-based models. Using a corpus gathered from several public sources, we create a large-scale parallel dataset of over 400,000 noisy-clean Hausa sentence pairs by introducing synthetically generated noise to mimic realistic writing errors. Moreover, we finetune several multilingual and African language models, including M2M100, AfriTeVA, NCAIR1/N-ATLaS, UBC-NLP/cheetah-base, and other variants of BART and T5 for this correction task. Our experimental results demonstrate that models such as M2M100 achieve state-of-the-art results despite their smaller size and distinct pretraining, and that correcting errors can have a significant impact in improving downstream tasks such as text classification, machine translation, question answering, and LLM prompting in general. This research provides a methodology, a publicly available dataset, and a comparison of models to improve Hausa text quality, thereby advancing NLP capabilities for the language and offering transferable insights for other low-resource languages.
Beyond Monolingual Assumptions: A Survey on Code-Switched NLP in the Era of Large Language Models across Modalities
PDF ↗Amidst the rapid advances of large language models (LLMs), most LLMs still struggle with mixed-language inputs, limited Code-switching (CSW) datasets, and evaluation biases, which hinder their deployment in multilingual societies. This survey provides the first comprehensive analysis of CSW-aware LLM research, reviewing 327 studies spanning five research areas, 15+ NLP tasks, 30+ datasets, and 80+ languages. We classify recent advances by architecture, training strategy, and evaluation methodology, outlining how LLMs have reshaped CSW modelling and what challenges persist. The paper concludes with a roadmap emphasizing the need for inclusive datasets, fair evaluation, and linguistically grounded models to achieve truly multilingual intelligence. A curated collection of all resources is maintained at https://github.com/lingo-iitgn/awesome-code-mixing/.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a powerful framework for knowledge-intensive tasks, yet its effectiveness in long-context scenarios is often bottlenecked by the retriever’s inability to distinguish sparse yet crucial evidence. Standard retrievers, optimized for query-document similarity, frequently fail to align with the downstream goal of generating a precise answer. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel fine-tuning framework that optimizes the retriever for Answer Alignment. Specifically, we first identify high-quality positive chunks by evaluating their sufficiency to generate the correct answer. We then employ a curriculum-based contrastive learning scheme to fine-tune the retriever. This curriculum leverages LLM-constructed Knowledge Graphs (KGs) to generate augmented queries, which in turn mine progressively challenging hard negatives. This process trains the retriever to distinguish the answer-sufficient positive chunks from these nuanced distractors, enhancing its generalization. Extensive experiments on 10 datasets from the Ultradomain and LongBench benchmarks demonstrate that our fine-tuned retriever achieves state-of-the-art performance, improving 14.5% over the base model without substantial architectural modifications and maintaining strong efficiency for long-context RAG. Our work presents a robust and effective methodology for building truly answer-centric retrievers.
Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) have emerged as a promising alternative to Autoregressive Language Models, yet their inference strategies largely rely on prefix-based prompting inherited from the autoregressive paradigm. In this paper, we propose Template Infilling (TI), a conditioning methodology tailored for DLMs. Unlike conventional prefix prompting, TI distributes structural anchors across the target response, establishing a global template before infilling masked segments. This enables structured conditioning that leverages the bidirectional generation process of DLMs. We evaluate TI on diverse benchmarks, including mathematical reasoning, code generation, and trip planning, achieving consistent improvements of 9.40%p over baseline prompting strategies. Furthermore, TI naturally supports multi-token generation settings, providing practical speed advantages while maintaining generation quality and robustness. Overall, our results highlight a DLM-specific conditioning paradigm for structured generation, suggesting a promising direction for inference methods tailored to diffusion-based language models.
Existing cultural commonsense benchmarks treat nations as monolithic, assuming uniform practices within national boundaries. But does cultural commonsense hold uniformly within a nation, or does it vary at the sub-national level? We introduce **Indica**, the first benchmark designed to test LLMs’ ability to address this question, focusing on India—a nation of 28 states, 8 union territories, and 22 official languages. We collect human-annotated answers from five Indian regions (North, South, East, West, and Central) across 515 questions spanning 8 domains of everyday life, yielding 1,630 region-specific question-answer pairs. Strikingly, only 39.4% of questions elicit agreement across all five regions, demonstrating that cultural commonsense in India is predominantly regional, not national. We evaluate eight state-of-the-art LLMs and find two critical gaps: models achieve only 13.4%–20.9% accuracy on region-specific questions, and they exhibit geographic bias, over-selecting Central and North India as the "default" (selected 30-40% more often than expected) while under-representing East and West. Beyond India, our methodology provides a generalizable framework for evaluating cultural commonsense in any culturally heterogeneous nation, from question design grounded in anthropological taxonomy, to regional data collection, to bias measurement.
Between a Rock and a Hard Place: The Tension Between Ethical Reasoning and Safety Alignment in LLMs
PDF ↗Large Language Model safety alignment predominantly operates on a binary assumption that requests are either safe or unsafe. This classification proves insufficient when models encounter ethical dilemmas, where the capacity to reason through moral trade-offs creates a distinct attack surface. We formalize this vulnerability through TRIAL, a multi-turn red-teaming methodology that embeds harmful requests within ethical framings. TRIAL achieves consistently high attack success rates across models by exploiting the model’s own ethical reasoning to frame harmful actions as morally necessary compromises. Building on these insights, we introduce ERR (Ethical Reasoning Robustness), a defense framework that distinguishes between instrumental responses that enable harmful outcomes and explanatory responses that analyze ethical frameworks without endorsing harmful acts. ERR employs a Layer-Stratified Harm-Gated LoRA architecture, achieving robust defense against reasoning-based attacks while preserving model utility.
Make Mechanistic Interpretability Auditable: A Call to Develop Guidelines via Continuous Collaborative Reviewing
PDF ↗While mechanistic interpretability (MI) has produced important insights into neural network internals, the field has yet to establish a standardized system to audit experiments. As such, many of its findings remain underutilized in safety-critical applications such as medical AI and autonomous systems, as stakeholders cannot certify their validity. Recent work demonstrates this concretely: two papers found conflicting conclusions for the same behavior, and a third study revealed that both were partially correct but incomparable due to methodological inconsistencies. Without standardized auditing, such ambiguities hinder adoption in high-stakes contexts requiring strong correctness guarantees. We call for the MI community to work towards developing a novel reviewing system that complements peer review via: (1) Continuous reviewing supported by a Collaborative Reviewing Platform where meta-science results and discussions (such as critiques, negative results, post-hoc extensions, reproductions, replications, and partial results) that fit outside of papers are organized and discussed, allowing for comments and revisions to be made at any time (2) Generalizing good practices found on this platform into expert-verified guidelines and protocols to improve auditing efficiency, and (3) Source-based auditing systems that track arguments which claims depend on. This position paper encourages constructive debate over the necessity, design and implementation of such a framework, providing early concrete examples to help catalyze these dialogues. Overall, we propose that auditing MI itself is essential for its application in AI safety, industry, and governance.
Can Continual Pretraining Bridge the Performance Gap between General-purpose and Specialized Language Models in the Medical Domain?
PDF ↗This paper narrows the performance gap between small, specialized models and significantly larger general-purpose models through domain adaptation via continual pre-training and merging. We address the scarcity of specialized non-English data by constructing a high-quality German medical corpus (FineMed-de) from FineWeb2. This corpus is used to continually pre-train and merge three well-known LLMs (ranging from 7B to 24B parameters), creating the DeFineMed model family. A comprehensive evaluation confirms that specialization dramatically enhances 7B model performance on German medical benchmarks. Furthermore, the pairwise win-rate analysis of the Qwen2.5-based models demonstrates an approximately 3.5-fold increase in the win-rate against the much larger Mistral-Small-24B-Instruct through domain adaptation. This evidence positions specialized 7B models as a competitive, resource-efficient solution for complex medical instruction-following tasks. While model merging successfully restores instruction-following abilities, a subsequent failure mode analysis reveals inherent trade-offs, including the introduction of language mixing and increased verbosity, highlighting the need for more targeted fine-tuning in future work. This research provides a robust, compliant methodology for developing specialized LLMs, serving as the foundation for practical use in German-speaking healthcare contexts.
Lagrangian-based methodologies are one of the fundamental paradigms of safe reinforcement learning (RL) for constrained Markov decision processes, particularly when dealing with multi-constraint cases. While the specific details of the methodologies may differ, with some using a single estimator for the overall mixed penalty term of the constraints and others using separate estimators for the constraints, the fundamental question of the theoretical validity of the methodologies has remained largely unexplored. The present paper performs the first theoretical analysis of the methodologies and proves that the use of the mixed critic structure leads to the presence of a bias due to the target drift of the Lagrange multipliers. On the other hand, the use of the dedicated critic structure, where separate critics are used for the reward function and the constraint functions, does not suffer from this bias. The theoretical analysis is supported with experiments on a realistic power system environment with multiple constraints, where the dedicated critic structure succeeds in satisfying the constraints, whereas the mixed critic structure fails.
General Machine Learning · Methodology
Tensor Product Representations provide the structural fidelity required for symbolic reasoning in models but suffer from *exponential* dimensionality growth when encoding deep recursive structures. Conversely, Vector Symbolic Architectures maintain *constant* dimensionality but sacrifice capacity and fidelity due to noisy compression via superposition. In this work, we propose **Orthogonal Subspace Carving (OSC)**, a memory architecture that binds *fillers* to *roles* by projecting onto the null space of the role basis before aggregating into a fixed order-$p$ tensor. OSC uses projections to enforce geometric orthogonality between bound structures within a {\em static} memory trace. We show that this mechanism decouples the tensor order from the structural depth, enabling deep recursive binding within a *constant* memory footprint. This construction allows for component vectors that are *orders of magnitude* smaller than the memory tensor, giving excellent memory efficiency in settings involving high superposition. We also show that TPR is a special case of binding in Clifford algebra, and give a Clifford formulation of OSC.
General Machine Learning · Evaluation
Reliable automatic seizure detection from long-term electroencephalogram recordings (EEG) remains an unsolved challenge, as current models often fail to generalize across patients or clinical settings. Manual EEG review still is the standard of care, highlighting the need for robust models and standardized evaluation. The current literature often reports high efficacy, yet these models frequently fail when deployed to unseen patient populations. To rigorously assess this generalization gap, we conducted a large-scale empirical study evaluating 28 state-of-the-art algorithmic architectures, ranging from classical feature engineering to modern Deep Learning. These algorithms were collected by organizing competition. A strictly held-out private dataset of continuous EEG recordings from 65 subjects, totaling 4'360 hours of data, was utilized to evaluate algorithm performance. Expert neurophysiologists annotated these recordings, establishing the ground truth for seizure events. Algorithms were evaluated using event-based metrics from the SzCORE framework, including sensitivity, precision, F1-score, and false positive rate per day. Results revealed significant performance variability among state-of-the-art approaches, with the top F1 score of 32% (sensitivity 37%, precision 29%), highlighting the persistent difficulty of this task for current machine learning methodologies. Our analysis uncovered a discordance between peak performance and population-level stability. The algorithms achieving the highest aggregate F1-scores did not achieve the most consistent ranking across subjects, indicating high performance variance and susceptibility to failure on outlier patients. This independent evaluation also exposed a notable gap between self-reported efficacies and hold-out performance, underscoring the critical need for standardized, rigorous benchmarking in developing clinically viable ML models. A comparison with previous challenges and commercial systems indicates that the best algorithm in this study surpassed prior methods. Critically, the evaluation infrastructure transitions into a continuously open benchmarking platform, fostering reproducible research and accelerating the development of robust seizure detection algorithms by allowing ongoing submissions and integration of additional private datasets. Clinical centers can also adopt this platform to evaluate seizure detection algorithms on their EEG data using a standardized, reproducible framework.
General Machine Learning · Methodology
Reliable uncertainty quantification at unobserved spatial locations is a key challenge in spatial statistics, particularly for complex and heterogeneous datasets. While traditional methods such as Kriging rely on strong distributional assumptions, conformal prediction (CP) offers a distribution-free alternative. However, although non-i.i.d. CP theory is well established for time-series data, a significant gap remains for spatial data, where the lack of a natural ordering and discrete index complicates theoretical guarantees. Existing CP theory for spatial data often relies on exchangeability. We propose Localized Spatial Conformal Prediction (LSCP), a model-agnostic framework that bridges this gap by coupling local quantile regression with conformal calibration. LSCP conditions on spatial neighborhoods to capture local heterogeneity. We show that LSCP retains finite-sample marginal coverage under spatial exchangeability and attains asymptotic conditional coverage under stationarity and spatial mixing. Across synthetic and real datasets, LSCP consistently achieves near-nominal coverage with tighter and more stable prediction intervals than existing methods that fail to capture these spatial dependencies.
Social Aspects · Accountability, Transparency, and Interpretability
Why do thinking language models outperform their base counterparts, and what exactly do they learn during training? We introduce constructive model diffing, a framework for understanding fine-tuned models by explicitly constructing the base-to-fine-tuned difference from interpretable components to produce hybrid models, and measuring how well they recover the fine-tuned model's performance. For thinking models, we decompose the diff into two components: reasoning mechanisms (steering vectors that activate specific behaviors in the base model) and reasoning heuristics (a classifier that determines when each mechanism should fire). To ground this decomposition, we develop an unsupervised methodology using Sparse Autoencoders to discover interpretable taxonomies of reasoning behaviors. Evaluating nine model configurations (five RL-trained, four distilled), we find a striking difference between training methods: the hybrid models for the five RL-trained models achieve much higher performance recovery compared to the four distilled models. This indicates RL-trained models primarily learn sophisticated heuristics for deploying pre-existing base model mechanisms, while distillation affects the mechanisms themselves. These results provide a new lens for understanding what different training paradigms teach, with potential implications for efficient reasoning model development.