论文检索

Theory · Everything Else

Arya Mazumdar, Neha Sangwan

We consider the problem of *exact* recovery of a $k$-sparse binary vector from generalized linear measurements (such as *logistic regression*). We analyze the *linear estimation* algorithm (Plan, Vershynin, Yudovina, 2017), and also show information theoretic lower bounds on the number of required measurements. As a consequence of our results, for noisy one bit quantized linear measurements ($\mathsf{1bCS}$), we obtain a sample complexity of $O((k+\sigma^2)\log{n})$, where $\sigma^2$ is the noise variance. This is shown to be optimal due to the information theoretic lower bound. We also obtain tight sample complexity characterization for logistic regression.Since $\mathsf{1bCS}$ is a strictly harder problem than noisy linear measurements ($\mathsf{SparseLinearReg}$) because of added quantization, the same sample complexity is achievable for $\mathsf{SparseLinearReg}$. While this sample complexity can be obtained via the popular lasso algorithm, linear estimation is computationally more efficient. Our lower bound holds for any set of measurements for $\mathsf{SparseLinearReg}$ (similar bound was known for Gaussian measurement matrices) and is closely matched by the maximum-likelihood upper bound. For $\mathsf{SparseLinearReg}$, it was conjectured in Gamarnik and Zadik, 2017 that there is a statistical-computational gap and the number of measurements should be at least $(2k+\sigma^2)\log{n}$ for efficient algorithms to exist. It is worth noting that our results imply that there is no such statistical-computational gap for $\mathsf{1bCS}$ and logistic regression.

Reinforcement Learning · Planning

Qiuhao Wang, Yuqi Zha, Chin Pang Ho, Marek Petrik

Robust Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) offer a promising framework for computing reliable policies under model uncertainty. While policy gradient methods have gained increasing popularity in robust discounted MDPs, their application to the average-reward criterion remains largely unexplored. This paper proposes a Robust Projected Policy Gradient (RP2G), the first generic policy gradient method for robust average-reward MDPs (RAMDPs) that is applicable beyond the typical rectangularity assumption on transition ambiguity. In contrast to existing robust policy gradient algorithms, RP2G incorporates an adaptive decreasing tolerance mechanism for efficient policy updates at each iteration. We also present a comprehensive convergence analysis of RP2G for solving ergodic tabular RAMDPs. Furthermore, we establish the first study of the inner worst-case transition evaluation problem in RAMDPs, proposing two gradient-based algorithms tailored for rectangular and general ambiguity sets, each with provable convergence guarantees. Numerical experiments confirm the global convergence of our new algorithm and demonstrate its superior performance.

Deep Learning · Large Language Models

Lutfi Erdogan, Hiroki Furuta, Sehoon Kim, Nicholas Lee, Suhong Moon, Gopala Anumanchipalli, Kurt Keutzer, Amir Gholaminejad

Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable advancements in enabling language agents to tackle simple tasks. However, applying them for complex, multi-step, long-horizon tasks remains a challenge. Recent work have found success by separating high-level planning from low-level execution, which enables the model to effectively balance high-level planning objectives and low-level execution details. However, generating accurate plans remains difficult since LLMs are not inherently trained for this task. To address this, we propose Plan-and-Act, a novel framework that incorporates explicit planning into LLM-based agents and introduces a scalable method to enhance plan generation through a novel synthetic data generation method. Plan-and-Act consists of a Planner model which generates structured, high-level plans to achieve user goals, and an Executor model that translates these plans into environment-specific actions. To train the Planner effectively, we introduce a synthetic data generation method that annotates ground-truth trajectories with feasible plans, augmented with diverse and extensive examples to enhance generalization. We evaluate Plan-and-Act using web navigation as a representative long-horizon planning environment, demonstrating a state-of-the-art 57.58% success rate on the WebArena-Lite benchmark as well as a text-only state-of-the-art 81.36% success rate on WebVoyager.

Reinforcement Learning

Arman Sharifi Kolarijani, Tolga Ok, Peyman Mohajerin Esfahani, Mohamad Amin Sharifi Kolarijani

In this paper, we provide a novel algorithm for solving planning and learning problems of Markov decision processes. The proposed algorithm follows a policy iteration-type update by using a rank-one approximation of the transition probability matrix in the policy evaluation step. This rank-one approximation is closely related to the stationary distribution of the corresponding transition probability matrix, which is approximated using the power method. We provide theoretical guarantees for the convergence of the proposed algorithm to optimal (action-)value function with the same rate and computational complexity as the value iteration algorithm in the planning problem and as the Q-learning algorithm in the learning problem. Through our extensive numerical simulations, however, we show that the proposed algorithm consistently outperforms first-order algorithms and their accelerated versions for both planning and learning problems.

Reinforcement Learning · Planning

Tuan Dam

Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) has demonstrated success in online planning for deterministic environments, yet significant challenges remain in adapting it to stochastic Markov Decision Processes (MDPs), particularly in continuous state-action spaces. Existing methods, such as HOOT, which combines MCTS with the Hierarchical Optimistic Optimization (HOO) bandit strategy, address continuous spaces but rely on a logarithmic exploration bonus that lacks theoretical guarantees in non-stationary, stochastic settings. Recent advancements, such as Poly-HOOT, introduced a polynomial bonus term to achieve convergence in deterministic MDPs, though a similar theory for stochastic MDPs remains undeveloped. In this paper, we propose a novel MCTS algorithm, Stochastic-Power-HOOT, designed for continuous, stochastic MDPs. Stochastic-Power-HOOT integrates a power mean as a value backup operator, alongside a polynomial exploration bonus to address the non-stationarity inherent in continuous action spaces. Our theoretical analysis establishes that Stochastic-Power-HOOT converges at a polynomial rate of $\mathcal{O}(n^{-1/2})$, where \( n \) is the number of visited trajectories, thereby extending the non-asymptotic convergence guarantees of Poly-HOOT to stochastic environments. Experimental results on synthetic and stochastic tasks validate our theoretical findings, demonstrating the effectiveness of Stochastic-Power-HOOT in continuous, stochastic domains.

Reinforcement Learning · Planning

Tuan Dam, Pascal Stenger, Lukas Schneider, Joni Pajarinen, Carlo D'Eramo, Odalric-Ambrym Maillard

This paper introduces a novel backup strategy for Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) tailored for highly stochastic and partially observable Markov decision processes. We adopt a probabilistic approach, modeling both value and action-value nodes as Gaussian distributions, to introduce a novel backup operator that computes value nodes as the Wasserstein barycenter of their action-value children nodes; thus, propagating the uncertainty of the estimate across the tree to the root node. We study our novel backup operator when using a novel combination of $L^1$-Wasserstein barycenter with $\alpha$-divergence, by drawing a crucial connection to the generalized mean backup operator. We complement our probabilistic backup operator with two sampling strategies, based on optimistic selection and Thompson sampling, obtaining our Wasserstein MCTS algorithm. We provide theoretical guarantees of asymptotic convergence of $\mathcal{O}(n^{-1/2})$, with $n$ as the number of visited trajectories, to the optimal policy and an empirical evaluation on several stochastic and partially observable environments, where our approach outperforms well-known related baselines.

Reinforcement Learning · Planning

Tuan Dam, Kishan Panaganti, Brahim Driss, Adam Wierman

Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) is a powerful framework for solving complex decision-making problems, yet it often relies on the assumption that the simulator and the real-world dynamics are identical. Although this assumption helps achieve the success of MCTS in games like Chess, Go, and Shogi, the real-world scenarios incur ambiguity due to their modeling mismatches in low-fidelity simulators. In this work, we present a new robust variant of MCTS that mitigates dynamical model ambiguities. Our algorithm addresses transition dynamics and reward distribution ambiguities to bridge the gap between simulation-based planning and real-world deployment. We incorporate a robust power mean backup operator and carefully designed exploration bonuses to ensure finite-sample convergence at every node in the search tree. We show that our algorithm achieves a convergence rate of $\mathcal{O}(n^{-1/2})$ for the value estimation at the root node, comparable to that of standard MCTS. Finally, we provide empirical evidence that our method achieves robust performance in planning problems even under significant ambiguity in the underlying reward distribution and transition dynamics.

Theory · Reinforcement Learning and Planning

Enric Borrell, Lorenz Richter, Christof Schuette

We extend the standard reinforcement learning framework to random time horizons. While the classical setting typically assumes finite and deterministic or infinite runtimes of trajectories, we argue that multiple real-world applications naturally exhibit random (potentially trajectory-dependent) stopping times. Since those stopping times typically depend on the policy, their randomness has an effect on policy gradient formulas, which we (mostly for the first time) derive rigorously in this work both for stochastic and deterministic policies. We present two complementary perspectives, trajectory or state-space based, and establish connections to optimal control theory. Our numerical experiments demonstrate that using the proposed formulas can significantly improve optimization convergence compared to traditional approaches.

Applications

Shenyuan Gao, Siyuan Zhou, Yilun Du, Jun Zhang, Chuang Gan

World models aim to learn action-controlled future prediction and have proven essential for the development of intelligent agents. However, most existing world models rely heavily on substantial action-labeled data and costly training, making it challenging to adapt to novel environments with heterogeneous actions through limited interactions. This limitation can hinder their applicability across broader domains. To overcome this limitation, we propose AdaWorld, an innovative world model learning approach that enables efficient adaptation. The key idea is to incorporate action information during the pretraining of world models. This is achieved by extracting latent actions from videos in a self-supervised manner, capturing the most critical transitions between frames. We then develop an autoregressive world model that conditions on these latent actions. This learning paradigm enables highly adaptable world models, facilitating efficient transfer and learning of new actions even with limited interactions and finetuning. Our comprehensive experiments across multiple environments demonstrate that AdaWorld achieves superior performance in both simulation quality and visual planning.

Qianlan Yang, Yu-Xiong Wang

In offline reinforcement learning (RL), managing the distribution shift between the learned policy and the static offline dataset is a persistent challenge that can result in overestimated values and suboptimal policies. Traditional offline RL methods address this by introducing conservative biases that limit exploration to well-understood regions, but they often overly restrict the agent's generalization capabilities. Recent work has sought to generate trajectories using generative models to augment the offline dataset, yet these methods still struggle with overestimating synthesized data, especially when out-of-distribution samples are produced. To overcome this issue, we propose RTDiff, a novel diffusion-based data augmentation technique that synthesizes trajectories *in reverse*, moving from unknown to known states. Such reverse generation naturally mitigates the risk of overestimation by ensuring that the agent avoids planning through unknown states. Additionally, reverse trajectory synthesis allows us to generate longer, more informative trajectories that take full advantage of diffusion models' generative strengths while ensuring reliability. We further enhance RTDiff by introducing flexible trajectory length control and improving the efficiency of the generation process through noise management. Our empirical results show that RTDiff significantly improves the performance of several state-of-the-art offline RL algorithms across diverse environments, achieving consistent and superior results by effectively overcoming distribution shift.

Theory · Reinforcement Learning and Planning

Sharath Matada, Luke Bhan, Yuanyuan Shi, Nikolay Atanasov

In this work, we introduce a planning neural operator (PNO) for predicting the value function of a motion planning problem. We recast value function approximation as learning a single operator from the cost function space to the value functionspace, which is defined by an Eikonal partial differential equation (PDE). Therefore, our PNO model, despite being trained with a finite number of samples at coarse resolution, inherits the zero-shot super-resolution property of neural operators. We demonstrate accurate value function approximation at 16× the training resolution on the MovingAI lab’s 2D city dataset, compare with state-of-the-art neural valuefunction predictors on 3D scenes from the iGibson building dataset and showcase optimal planning with 4-joint robotic manipulators. Lastly, we investigate employing the value function output of PNO as a heuristic function to accelerate motion planning. We show theoretically that the PNO heuristic is $\epsilon$-consistent by introducing an inductive bias layer that guarantees our value functions satisfy the triangle inequality. With our heuristic, we achieve a $30$% decrease in nodes visited while obtaining near optimal path lengths on the MovingAI lab 2D city dataset, compared to classical planning methods (A$^\ast$, RRT$^\ast$).

Reinforcement Learning · Planning

Jan Robine, Marc Höftmann, Stefan Harmeling

What are the essential components of world models? How far do we get with world models that are not employing RNNs, transformers, discrete representations, and image reconstructions? This paper introduces SGF, a Simple, Good, and Fast world model that uses self-supervised representation learning, captures short-time dependencies through frame and action stacking, and enhances robustness against model errors through data augmentation. We extensively discuss SGF’s connections to established world models, evaluate the building blocks in ablation studies, and demonstrate good performance through quantitative comparisons on the Atari 100k benchmark. The code is available at https://github.com/jrobine/sgf.

Yu Feng, Ben Zhou, Weidong Lin, Dan Roth

Predictive models often need to work with incomplete information in real-world tasks. Consequently, they must provide reliable probability or confidence estimation, especially in large-scale decision-making and planning tasks. Current large language models (LLMs) are insufficient for accurate estimations, but they can generate relevant factors that may affect the probabilities, produce coarse-grained probabilities when the information is more complete, and help determine which factors are relevant to specific downstream contexts. In this paper, we make use of these capabilities of LLMs to provide a significantly more accurate probabilistic estimation. We propose BIRD, a novel probabilistic inference framework that aligns a Bayesian network with LLM abductions and then estimates more accurate probabilities in a deduction step. We show BIRD provides reliable probability estimations that are 30% better than those provided directly by LLM baselines. These estimates further contribute to better and more trustworthy decision making.

Deep Learning · Large Language Models

Yanming Liu, Xinyue Peng, Jiannan Cao, S, Yuwei Zhang, Xuhong Zhang, Sheng Cheng, Xun Wang, Jianwei Yin, Tianyu Du

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional reasoning capabilities, enabling them to solve various complex problems. Recently, this ability has been applied to the paradigm of tool learning. Tool learning involves providing examples of tool usage and their corresponding functions, allowing LLMs to formulate plans and demonstrate the process of invoking and executing each tool. LLMs can address tasks that they cannot complete independently, thereby enhancing their potential across different tasks. However, this approach faces two key challenges. First, redundant error correction leads to unstable planning and long execution time. Additionally, designing a correct plan among multiple tools is also a challenge in tool learning. To address these issues, we propose Tool-Planner, a task-processing framework based on toolkits. Tool-Planner groups tools based on the API functions with the same function into a toolkit and allows LLMs to implement planning across the various toolkits. When a tool error occurs, the language model can reselect and adjust tools based on the toolkit. Experiments show that our approach demonstrates a high pass and win rate across different datasets and optimizes the planning scheme for tool learning in models such as GPT-4 and Claude 3, showcasing the potential of our method. Our code is public at https://github.com/OceannTwT/Tool-Planner.

Haofu Qian, Chenjia Bai, Jiatao Zhang, Fei Wu, Wei Song, Xuelong Li

Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased remarkable reasoning capabilities in various domains, yet face challenges in complex embodied tasks due to the need for a coherent long-term policy and context-sensitive environmental understanding. Previous work performed LLM refinement relying on outcome-supervised feedback, which can be costly and ineffective. In this work, we introduce a novel framework, Discriminator-Guided Action Optimization (DGAP), for facilitating the optimization of LLM action plans via step-wise signals. Specifically, we employ a limited set of demonstrations to enable the discriminator to learn a score function, which assesses the alignment between LLM-generated actions and the underlying optimal ones at every step. Based on the discriminator, LLMs are prompted to generate actions that maximize the score, utilizing historical action-score pair trajectories as guidance. Under mild conditions, DGAP resembles critic-regularized optimization and has been demonstrated to achieve a stronger policy than the LLM planner. In experiments across different LLMs (GPT-4, Llama3-70B) in ScienceWorld and VirtualHome, our method achieves superior performance and better efficiency than previous methods.

Deep Learning · Large Language Models

Logan Cross, Violet Xiang, Agam Bhatia, Daniel Yamins, Nick Haber

Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) methods struggle with the non-stationarity of multi-agent systems and fail to adaptively learn online when tested with novel agents. Here, we leverage large language models (LLMs) to create an autonomous agent that can handle these challenges. Our agent, Hypothetical Minds, consists of a cognitively-inspired architecture, featuring modular components for perception, memory, and hierarchical planning over two levels of abstraction. We introduce the Theory of Mind module that scaffolds the high-level planning process by generating hypotheses about other agents' strategies in natural language. It then evaluates and iteratively refines these hypotheses by reinforcing hypotheses that make correct predictions about the other agents' behavior. Hypothetical Minds significantly improves performance over previous LLM-agent and RL baselines on a range of competitive, mixed motive, and collaborative domains in the Melting Pot benchmark, including both dyadic and population-based environments. Additionally, comparisons against LLM-agent baselines and ablations reveal the importance of hypothesis evaluation and refinement for succeeding on complex scenarios.

Deep Learning · Large Language Models

Murong Yue, Wenlin Yao, Haitao Mi, Dian Yu, Ziyu Yao, Dong Yu

Enhancing the capability of large language models (LLMs) in reasoning has gained significant attention in recent years. Previous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of various prompting strategies in aiding LLMs in reasoning (called "reasoning actions"), such as step-by-step thinking, reflecting before answering, solving with programs, and their combinations. However, these approaches often applied static, predefined reasoning actions uniformly to all questions, without considering the specific characteristics of each question or the capability of the task-solving LLM. In this paper, we propose DOTS, an approach enabling LLMs to reason Dynamically via Optimal reasoning Trajectories Search, tailored to the specific characteristics of each question and the inherent capability of the task-solving LLM. Our approach involves three key steps: i) defining atomic reasoning action modules that can be composed into various reasoning action trajectories; ii) searching for the optimal action trajectory for each training question through iterative exploration and evaluation for the specific task-solving LLM; and iii) using the collected optimal trajectories to train an LLM to plan for the reasoning trajectories of unseen questions. In particular, we propose two learning paradigms, i.e., fine-tuning an external LLM as a planner to guide the task-solving LLM, or directly fine-tuning the task-solving LLM with an internalized capability for reasoning actions planning. Our experiments across eight reasoning tasks show that our method consistently outperforms static reasoning techniques and the vanilla instruction tuning approach. Further analysis reveals that our method enables LLMs to adjust their computation based on problem complexity, allocating deeper thinking and reasoning to harder problems.

Deep Learning · Large Language Models

Evan Wang, Federico Cassano, Catherine Wu, Yunfeng Bai, William Song, Vaskar Nath, Ziwen Han, Sean Hendryx, Summer Yue, Hugh Zhang

While scaling training compute has led to remarkable improvements in large language models (LLMs), scaling inference compute only recently began to yield analogous gains. We hypothesize that a core missing component is a lack of diverse LLM outputs, leading to inefficient search due to models repeatedly sampling highly similar, yet incorrect generations. We empirically demonstrate that this lack of diversity can be mitigated by searching over candidate plans for solving a problem in natural language. Based on this insight, we propose PlanSearch, a novel search algorithm which shows strong results across HumanEval+, MBPP+, and LiveCodeBench (a contamination-free benchmark for competitive coding). PlanSearch generates a diverse set of observations about the problem and uses these observations to construct plans for solving the problem. By searching over plans in natural language rather than directly over code solutions, PlanSearch explores a significantly more diverse range of potential solutions compared to baseline search methods. Using PlanSearch on top of Claude 3.5 Sonnet achieves a pass@200 of 77.0% on LiveCodeBench, outperforming both the best pass-rate achieved without any search (pass@1 = 41.4%) and using standard repeated sampling on top of existing non-search models (pass@200 = 60.6%). Finally, we show that, across all models, search algorithms, and benchmarks analyzed, we can accurately predict performance gains from search as a function of the diversity over generated ideas.

Applications · Robotics

Guanxing Lu, Ziwei Wang, Changliu Liu, Jiwen Lu, Yansong Tang

Embodied Instruction Following (EIF) requires agents to complete human instruction by interacting objects in complicated surrounding environments. Conventional methods directly consider the sparse human instruction to generate action plans for agents, which usually fail to achieve human goals because of the instruction incoherence in action descriptions. On the contrary, we propose ThinkBot that reasons the thought chain in human instruction to recover the missing action descriptions, so that the agent can successfully complete human goals by following the coherent instruction. Specifically, we first design an instruction completer based on large language models to recover the missing actions with interacted objects between consecutive human instruction, where the perceived surrounding environments and the completed sub-goals are considered for instruction completion. Based on the partially observed scene semantic maps, we present an object localizer to infer the position of interacted objects and the related Bayesian uncertainty for close-loop planning. Extensive experiments in the simulated environment show that our ThinkBot outperforms the state-of-the-art EIF methods by a sizable margin in both success rate and execution efficiency. Project page: https://guanxinglu.github.io/thinkbot/.

Deep Learning · Large Language Models

Zirui Zhao, Hanze Dong, Amrita Saha, Caiming Xiong, Doyen Sahoo

Hallucinations (i.e., generating plausible but inaccurate content) and laziness (i.e. excessive refusals or defaulting to "I don't know") persist as major challenges in LLM reasoning. Current efforts to reduce hallucinations primarily focus on factual errors in knowledge-grounded tasks, often neglecting hallucinations related to faulty reasoning. Meanwhile, some approaches render LLMs overly conservative, limiting their problem-solving capabilities. To mitigate hallucination and laziness in reasoning tasks, we propose Automatic Curriculum Expert Iteration (Auto-CEI) to enhance LLM reasoning and align responses to the model’s capabilities--assertively answering within its limits and declining when tasks exceed them. In our method, Expert Iteration explores the reasoning trajectories near the LLM policy, guiding incorrect paths back on track to reduce compounding errors and improve robustness; it also promotes appropriate "I don't know" responses after sufficient reasoning attempts. The curriculum automatically adjusts rewards, incentivizing extended reasoning before acknowledging incapability, thereby pushing the limits of LLM reasoning and aligning its behaviour with these limits. We compare Auto-CEI with various SOTA baselines across logical reasoning, mathematics, and planning tasks, where Auto-CEI achieves superior alignment by effectively balancing assertiveness and conservativeness.