Hallucination remains a major challenge for the safe and trustworthy deployment of large language models (LLMs) in factual content generation. Prior work has explored confidence estimation as an effective approach to hallucination detection, but often relies on post-hoc self-consistency methods that require computationally expensive sampling. Verbalized confidence offers a more efficient alternative, but existing approaches are largely limited to short-form question answering (QA) tasks and do not generalize well to open-ended generation. In this paper, we propose LoVeC (Long-form Verbalized Confidence), a novel reinforcement learning (RL)–based method that trains LLMs to append an on-the-fly numerical confidence score to each generated statement during long-form generation. The confidence score serves as a direct and interpretable signal of the factuality of generation. We introduce two evaluation settings, free-form tagging and iterative tagging, to assess different verbalized confidence estimation methods. Experiments on three long-form QA datasets show that our RL-trained models achieve better calibration and generalize robustly across domains. Also, our method is highly efficient, being 20 \times faster than traditional self-consistency methods while achieving better calibration.
论文检索
输入标题、作者或关键词，从 9,460 篇学术成果中精准定位
Reinforcement learning (RL) paradigms have demonstrated strong performance on reasoning-intensive tasks such as code generation. However, limited trajectory diversity often leads to diminishing returns, which constrains the achievable performance ceiling. Search-enhanced RL alleviates this issue by introducing structured exploration, which remains constrained by the single-agent policy priors. Meanwhile, leveraging multiple interacting policies can acquire more diverse exploratory signals, but existing approaches are typically decoupled from structured search. We propose MARS^2 (Multi-Agent Reinforced Tree-Search Scaling), a unified RL framework in which multiple independently-optimized agents collaborate within a shared tree-structured search environment. MARS^2 models the search tree as a learnable multi-agent interaction environment, enabling heterogeneous agents to collaboratively generate and refine candidate solutions within a shared search topology. To support effective learning, we introduce a path-level group advantage formulation based on tree-consistent reward shaping, which facilitates effective credit assignment across complex search trajectories. Experiments on code generation benchmarks show that MARS^2 consistently improves performance across diverse model combinations and training settings, demonstrating the effectiveness of coupling multi-agent collaboration with tree search for enhancing reinforcement learning. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/TsinghuaC3I/MARTI.
Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). Despite its success, RL faces fundamental challenges, including low sample efficiency and a strong dependence on the quality of the base model: while some models improve rapidly with limited RL updates, others require substantial training data to achieve meaningful gains. Recent studies suggest that the patterns of thinking tokens play a critical role in RL performance, and that supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on datasets exhibiting desirable reasoning patterns can reduce reliance on base models and better prepare LLMs for RL. However, how to automatically discover such patterns across tasks remains unclear. In this work, we describe thinking token patterns with reasoning primitives and argue that initializing LLMs with diverse, high-quality primitives is crucial for stable and efficient RL training. We propose Tailor, a pipeline that automatically discovers such reasoning primitives and curates SFT datasets to prepare LLMs for RL. Extensive experiments on mathematical and logical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that Tailor consistently improves downstream RL performance, outperforming strong baselines, including methods with expert domain knowledge.
How Instruction and Reasoning Data shape Post-Training: Data Quality through the Lens of Layer-wise Gradients
PDF ↗As the post-training of large language models (LLMs) advances from instruction-following to complex reasoning tasks, understanding how different data affect finetuning dynamics remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we present a spectral analysis of layer-wise gradients induced by low/high-quality instruction and reasoning data for LLM post-training. Our analysis reveals that widely-studied metrics for data evaluation, e.g., IFD, InsTag, Difficulty, and Reward, can be explained and unified by spectral properties computed from gradients’ singular value decomposition (SVD). Specifically, higher-quality data are usually associated with lower nuclear norms and higher effective ranks. Notably, effective rank exhibits better robustness and resolution than nuclear norm in capturing subtle quality differences. For example, reasoning data achieves substantially higher effective ranks than instruction data, implying richer gradient structures on more complex tasks. Our experiments also highlight that models within the same family share similar gradient patterns regardless of their sizes, whereas different model families diverge significantly. Providing a unified view on the effects of data quality across instruction and reasoning data, this work illuminates the interplay between data quality and training stability, shedding novel insights into developing better data exploration strategies for post-training.
ChemReason-Bench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Procedural Reasoning in Experimental Chemistry
PDF ↗Experimental protocols in organic synthesis specify not only the intended transformation but also an executable sequence of operations and conditions. While recent language models show strong chemistry knowledge, widely used evaluations remain less diagnostic of procedure-level decision making. In this setting, correctness requires consistent step ordering, feasibility under stated conditions, faithful entity-role grounding, and schema-parseable outputs that can be automatically validated against operational constraints. We present ChemReason-Bench, a human-validated benchmark for verifiable experimental procedure reasoning built on a structured representation with explicit placeholders and a unified schema, enabling automatic checks of many operational constraints. From 500 reactions, we instantiate 7306 benchmark tasks across six complementary formats: ordering, step validation, condition validation, schema-constrained completion, contrastive choice, and evidence-grounded rationalization. We further release a large-scale instantiation of the same templates for downstream adaptation studies, kept disjoint from the evaluation set. Using a unified evaluation protocol, we benchmark diverse open-source, proprietary, and domain-specific models and observe clear variation across the capability surface. We also report controlled adaptation experiments in the appendix, where supervised fine-tuning improves small models, preference optimization adds limited gains in our setting, and a gap remains to the strongest evaluated systems.
How predictable a word is can be generally quantified in two ways: using human responses to the cloze task or using probabilities from language models (LMs). When used as predictors of processing effort, LM probabilities outperform probabilities derived from cloze data. However, it is important to establish that LM probabilities do so for the right reasons, since different predictors can lead to different scientific conclusions about the role of prediction in language comprehension. We present evidence for three hypotheses about the apparent advantage of LM probabilities: not suffering from low resolution, distinguishing semantically similar words, and accurately assigning probabilities to low-frequency words. These results call for efforts to improve the resolution of cloze studies, coupled with experiments on whether human-like prediction is also as sensitive to the fine-grained distinctions made by LM probabilities.
Prompt injection attacks pose serious security risks across a wide range of real-world applications. While receiving increasing attention, the community faces a critical gap: the lack of a unified platform for prompt injection evaluation. This makes it challenging to reliably compare defenses, understand their true robustness under diverse attacks, or assess how well they generalize across tasks and benchmarks. For instance, many defenses initially reported as effective were later found to exhibit limited robustness on diverse datasets and attacks. To bridge this gap, we introduce PIArena, a unified and extensible platform for prompt injection evaluation that enables users to easily integrate state-of-the-art attacks and defenses and evaluate them across a variety of existing and new benchmarks. We also design a dynamic strategy-based attack that adaptively optimizes injected prompts based on defense feedback. Through comprehensive evaluation using PIArena, we uncover critical limitations of state-of-the-art defenses: limited generalizability across tasks, vulnerability to adaptive attacks, and fundamental challenges when an injected task aligns with the target task. The code and datasets are available at https://github.com/sleeepeer/PIArena.
Competitive programming has become a rigorous benchmark for evaluating the reasoning and problem-solving capabilities of large language models (LLMs). The International Olympiad in Informatics (IOI) stands out as one of the most prestigious annual competitions in competitive programming and has become a key benchmark for comparing human and AI-level programming ability. While several proprietary models have been claimed to achieve gold medal-level performance at the IOI, often with undisclosed methods, achieving comparable results with open-weight models remains a significant challenge. In this paper, we present GenCluster, a scalable and reproducible test-time compute framework that attains IOI gold-level performance using open-weight models. It combines large-scale generation, behavioral clustering, ranking, and a round-robin submission strategy to efficiently explore diverse solution spaces under limited validation budgets. Our experiments show that the performance of our proposed approach scales consistently with available compute, narrowing the gap between open and closed systems. Notably, we will show that GenCluster can achieve a gold medal at IOI 2025 for the first time with an open-weight model gpt-oss-120b, setting a new benchmark for transparent and reproducible evaluation of reasoning in LLMs.
Large Language Models (LLMs) for code generation (i.e., Code LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in AI-assisted software development and testing. However, recent studies have shown that these models are prone to generating vulnerable or even malicious code under adversarial settings. Existing red-teaming approaches rely on extensive human effort, limiting their scalability and practicality, and generally overlook the interactive nature of real-world AI-assisted programming, which often unfolds over multiple turns. To bridge these gaps, we present RedCoder, a red-teaming agent that engages victim models in multi-turn conversation to elicit vulnerable code. The pipeline to construct RedCoder begins with a multi-agent gaming process that simulates adversarial interactions, yielding a set of prototype conversations and an arsenal of reusable attack strategies. We then fine-tune an LLM on these prototype conversations to serve as the backbone of RedCoder. Once deployed, RedCoder autonomously engages Code LLMs in multi-turn conversations, dynamically retrieving relevant strategies from the arsenal to steer the dialogue toward vulnerability-inducing outputs. Experiments across multiple Code LLMs show that our approach outperforms prior single-turn and multi-turn red-team methods in inducing vulnerabilities in code generation, offering a scalable and effective tool for evaluating the security boundaries of modern code-generation systems.
Speculative Decoding has emerged as a popular technique for accelerating inference in Large Language Models. However, most existing approaches yield only modest improvements in production serving systems. Methods that achieve substantial speedups typically rely on an additional trained draft model or auxiliary model components, increasing deployment and maintenance complexity. This added complexity reduces flexibility, particularly when serving workloads shift to tasks, domains, or languages that are not well represented in the draft model’s training data.We introduce Simply-Scalable Speculative Decoding (SSSD), a training-free method that combines lightweight n-gram matching with hardware-aware speculation. Relative to standard autoregressive decoding, SSSD reduces latency by up to 2.9×. It achieves performance on par with leading training-based approaches across a broad range of benchmarks, while requiring substantially lower adoption effort—no data preparation, training or tuning are needed—and exhibiting superior robustness under language and domain shift, as well as in long-context settings.
LoPT: Lossless Parallel Tokenization Acceleration for Long Context Inference of Large Language Model
PDF ↗Long context inference scenarios have become increasingly important for large language models, yet they introduce significant computational latency. While prior research has optimized long-sequence inference through operators, model architectures, and system frameworks, tokenization remains an overlooked bottleneck. Existing parallel tokenization methods accelerate processing through text segmentation and multi-process tokenization, but they suffer from inconsistent results due to boundary artifacts that occur after merging. To address this, we propose LoPT, a novel Lossless Parallel Tokenization framework that ensures output identical to standard sequential tokenization. Our approach employs character-position-based matching and dynamic chunk length adjustment to align and merge tokenized segments accurately. Extensive experiments across diverse long-text datasets demonstrate that LoPT achieves significant speedup while guaranteeing lossless tokenization. We also provide theoretical proof of consistency and comprehensive analytical studies to validate the robustness of our method.
Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) dominate the post-training landscape for mathematical reasoning, yet differ fundamentally in their reliance on expert trajectories. To understand the optimal way to harness these trajectories for maximizing performance, we propose the Plasticity-Ceiling Framework. This framework empirically grounds the post-training landscape by decomposing the final performance ceiling into the foundational SFT performance and the subsequent RL plasticity (i.e., the maximum improvement via RL). Through extensive benchmarking, we establish the Sequential SFT-then-RL pipeline as the superior standard, overcoming the stability and premature convergence deficits inherent in synchronized approaches. Furthermore, we derive precise scaling guidelines: (1) Transitioning to RL at the Stable or Mild Overfitting Regime of SFT maximizes the final ceiling by securing a robust SFT foundation with substantial RL plasticity; (2) Refuting the “Less is More” hypothesis in SFT-then-RL scaling, we demonstrate that Data Scale determines the primary post-training potential, while Trajectory Difficulty acts as a performance multiplier; and (3) The Minimum Validation Loss of SFT serves as a reliable indicator for selecting the expert trajectories that maximize the ultimate performance ceiling. Our findings provide actionable guidelines for extracting maximum value from expert trajectories.
Language identification (LID) is a fundamental step in curating multilingual corpora. However, LID models still perform poorly for many languages, especially on the noisy and heterogeneous web data often used to train multilingual language models. In this paper, we introduce CommonLID, a community-driven, human-annotated LID benchmark for the web domain, covering 109 languages. Many of the included languages have been previously under-served, making CommonLID a key resource for developing more representative high-quality text corpora. We show CommonLID’s value by using it, alongside five other common evaluation sets, to test eight popular LID models. We analyse our results to situate our contribution and to provide an overview of the state of the art. In particular, we highlight that existing evaluations overestimate LID accuracy for many languages in the web domain. We make CommonLID and the code used to create it available under an open, permissive license.
Active Few-Shot Learning (AFSL) adapts LLMs to specialized domains by identifying the most valuable unlabeled samples for annotation and use as few-shot demonstrations, effectively reducing human annotation costs while promoting high performance. However, existing methods typically rely on output-level signals for the sample identification, such as predictive entropy or semantic similarities with test-time data based on external embeddings, which often overlook models’ internal dynamics which could pinpoint specific knowledge gaps. To bridge this gap, we propose NeuFS, a Neuron-Aware Active Few-Shot Learning framework that shifts the selection paradigm from output-level proxies to models’ internal dynamics. NeuFS utilizes neuron activation patterns to represent sample directly, and includes a dual-criteria selection strategy that: (1) ensures few-shot sample diversity with neuron patterns for broader example coverage, while (2) prioritizing on identifying informative and challenging few-shot samples LLMs tend to hallucinate by quantifying neuron consensus. Experiments on three datasets demonstrate that NeuFS excels in both reasoning and text classification tasks, outperforming existing AFSL baselines. Ablation studies further highlight that internal neuron activations provide a more principled and effective selection signal than external embeddings, validating the superiority of the proposed NeuFS.
Leveraging Outline-Optimized Generative Interactions and Critique for Self-Refining Outlines with Reinforcement Learning
PDF ↗Long-form outline generation requires satisfying multiple competing objectives simultaneously: outlines must be engaging, well-organized, topically relevant, and comprehensive while maintaining logical consistency across hierarchical structures. Current approaches either rely on expensive multi-turn interactions with large language models or employ procedural refinement pipelines that cannot systematically learn from critique. We present Logic-RL, a framework that transforms critique-guided outline refinement into a learnable policy through reinforcement learning. Our approach constructs refinement trajectories from teacher demonstrations, synthesizes explicit reasoning chains that decompose the critique-revision process, and optimizes a refinement policy using group relative policy optimization with structure-aware rewards. Experiments on FreshWiki and WikiOutline demonstrate that Logic-RL achieves substantial improvements over strong baselines, with the 0.6B model obtaining 79.17% relative gain and the 1.7B model achieving 8.67% improvement in average rubric scores compared to the best existing methods. Further analysis reveals that learned refinement policies generalize across domains and can be iteratively applied, with quality continuing to improve through three refinement rounds before diminishing returns.
Reinforcement learning (RL) is central to post-training, particularly for agentic models that require specialized reasoning behaviors. In this setting, model merging offers a practical mechanism for integrating multiple RL-trained agents from different tasks into a single generalist model. However, existing merging methods are designed for supervised fine-tuning (SFT), and they are suboptimal to preserve task-specific capabilities on RL-trained agentic models. The root is a task-vector mismatch between RL and SFT: on-policy RL induces task vectors that are highly sparse and heterogeneous, whereas SFT-style merging implicitly assumes dense and globally comparable task vectors. When standard global averaging is applied under this mismatch, RL’s non-overlapping task vectors that encode critical task-specific behaviors are reduced and parameter updates are diluted. To address this issue, we propose Reinforced Agent Merging (RAM), a distribution-aware merging framework explicitly designed for RL-trained agentic models. RAM disentangles shared and task-specific unique parameter updates, averaging shared components while selectively preserving and rescaling unique ones to counteract parameter update dilution. Experiments across multiple agent domains and model architectures demonstrate that RAM not only surpasses merging baselines, but also unlocks synergistic potential among agents to achieve performance superior to that of specialized agents in their domains.
The GDN-CC Dataset: Automatic Corpus Clarification for AI-enhanced Democratic Citizen Consultations
PDF ↗LLMs are ubiquitous in modern NLP, and while their applicability extends to texts produced for democratic activities such as online deliberations or large-scale citizen consultations, ethical questions have been raised for their usage as analysis tools. We continue this line of research with two main goals: (a) to develop resources that can help standardize citizen contributions in public forums at the pragmatic level, and make them easier to use in topic modeling and political analysis; (b) to study how well this standardization can reliably be performed by small, open-weights LLMs, i.e. models that can be run locally and transparently with limited resources. Accordingly, we introduce Corpus Clarification as a preprocessing framework for large-scale consultation data that transforms noisy, multi-topic contributions into structured, self-contained argumentative units ready for downstream analysis. We present GDN-CC, a manually-curated dataset of 1,231 contributions to the French Grand Débat National, comprising 2,285 argumentative units annotated for argumentative structure and manually clarified. We then show that finetuned Small Language Models match or outperform LLMs on reproducing these annotations, and measure their usability for an opinion clustering task. We finally release GDN-CC-large, an automatically annotated corpus of 240k contributions, the largest annotated democratic consultation dataset to date.
Cross-Tokenizer Knowledge Distillation (CTKD) enables knowledge transfer between a large language model and a smaller student, even when they employ different tokenizers. While existing approaches mainly focus on token-level alignment strategies, which are often brittle and sensitive to discrepancies between tokenizers, we argue that the method of aggregating tokens into more robust representations before distillation is of equal importance. In this paper, we introduce SRA (Span Representation Alignment for Large Language Model Distillation), a novel framework that reframes CTKD through the physical lens of Multi-Particle Dynamical Systems. SRA shifts the fundamental unit of alignment from tokens to robust, tokenizer-agnostic spans. We model each span as a cluster of particles and represent its state by its Center of Mass (CoM) - an attention-weighted average that captures rich semantic information. We leverage the concept of span centers of mass with attention-derived weighting to prioritize the most salient spans. In addition, we employ a geometric regularizer to preserve the structural integrity of the representation space and introduce aligned span logit distillation to enhance knowledge transfer across models. In challenging cross-architecture distillation experiments, SRA consistently and significantly outperforms state-of-the-art CTKD baselines, validating our physically-grounded approach.
Large Language Models (LLMs) often produce texts that appear coherent and credible, even when their factual reliability is uncertain. This paper investigates whether such perceived credibility correlates with the pervasive use of generics—generalizations without explicit quantification. We introduce a text-level genericity score derived from clause-level annotations and apply it to argumentative essays produced by humans and LLMs. To analyze how generics are realized in discourse, we employ Rhetorical Structure Theory to examine coherence relations across varying levels of genericity. Results show that according to our genericity metric, human texts are less generic than LLM-produced texts. As regards discourse, higher genericity correlates with less structured, paratactic structures, while for some models coherence is maintained through elaboration relations. Our findings suggest that some LLMs maintain well-structured coherence even in highly generic texts, which might enable them to "camouflage" argumentative texts as informative, enhancing their perceived credibility and persuasiveness.
Conversational agents are required to respond to their users not only with high quality (i.e. commonsense bearing) responses, but also considering multiple plausible alternative scenarios, reflecting the diversity in their responses. Despite the growing need to train diverse commonsense generators, the progress of this line of work has been significantly hindered by the lack of large-scale high-quality diverse commonsense training datasets. Due to the high annotation costs, existing Generative Commonsense Reasoning (GCR) datasets are created using a small number of human annotators, covering only a narrow set of commonsense scenarios. To address this training resource gap, we propose a two-stage method to create the first-ever synthetic dataset CommonSyn for diversified (GCR). The model fine-tuned on our synthetic data jointly increase both generation diversity and quality compared with vanilla models and the model fine-tuned on human-crafted dataset across different size Large Language Models (LLMs)