论文检索

输入标题、作者或关键词,从 13,033 篇学术成果中精准定位

会议来源 已选 1 项

机器学习与综合 AI

自然语言处理

计算机视觉

数据挖掘与 Web

多媒体与图形学

已选择 1 个会议
支持跨会议组合检索,PDF 均跳转至官方来源
已筛选 ICML
13,033篇论文
第 173 / 652 页

General Machine Learning · Evaluation

Anna Genevaux, Simon Frieder

This position paper argues that documentation is infrastructure for reproducible geometry reasoning: a benchmark for formal geometry problems to test AI systems is not usable in research unless its documented vocabulary is matched by executable, versioned behavior and minimal runnable examples. We use JGEX (as implemented by Newclid) as a case study of how documentation--implementation gaps and missing examples can silently constrain expressivity, fragment tool interoperability, and bias benchmark construction. To make our point, we introduce "A JGEX Dataset", a curated collection of $78$ Euclidean geometry problems with (i) original natural-language statements and sources, (ii) a JGEX-oriented rewrite that makes formalization steps explicit, (iii) executable JGEX code validated under a pinned solver version, and (iv) rich metadata. To make the target language auditable, we also provide a predicate-level support matrix for the $33$ documented predicates, generated from minimal test instances, and categorize predicates as supported, unsupported, or unstable due to missing accessible examples. Finally, we release validation scripts and a concise tutorial with worked walk-throughs. Our broader claim is that benchmark authors, tool maintainers, and reviewers should treat language documentation and conformance evidence as first-class artifacts—on par with datasets and evaluation code—if cross-tool, cross-version reproducibility is the goal.

Reinforcement Learning · Planning

Michael Katz, Harsha Kokel, Christian Muise, Shirin Sohrabi, Sarath Sreedharan

In over sixty years since its inception, the field of planning has made significant contributions to both the theory and practice of building planning software that can solve a never-before-seen planning problem. This was done through established practices of rigorous design and evaluation of planning systems. **It is our position that this rigor should be applied to the current trend of work on planning with large language models.** One way to do so is by correctly incorporating the insights, tools, and data from the automated planning community into the design and evaluation of LLM-based planners. The experience and expertise of the planning community could play a crucial role in accelerating the development of LLM-based planners. This position is particularly important in light of the abundance of recent works that replicate and propagate the same pitfalls that the planning community has encountered and learned from. We believe that establishing practices that avoid such known pitfalls will contribute greatly to the progress in building LLM-based planners and to planning in general.

Social Aspects · Safety

Enrico Cassano, Riccardo Renzulli, Marco Nurisso, Mirko Zaffaroni, Alan Perotti, Marco Grangetto

Concept unlearning in diffusion models is hampered by feature splitting, where concepts are distributed across many latent features, making their removal challenging and computationally expensive. We introduce SAEmnesia, a supervised sparse autoencoder framework that overcomes this by enforcing one-to-one concept-neuron mappings. By systematically labeling concepts during training, our method achieves feature centralization, binding each concept to a single, interpretable neuron. This enables highly targeted and efficient concept erasure. SAEmnesia reduces hyperparameter search by 96.7% and achieves a 9.2% improvement over the state-of-the-art on the UnlearnCanvas benchmark. Our method also demonstrates superior scalability in sequential unlearning, improving accuracy by 28.4% when removing nine objects, establishing a new standard for precise and controllable concept erasure. Moreover, SAEmnesia mitigates the possibility of generating unwanted content under adversarial attack and effectively removes nudity when evaluated with I2P.

Applications · Everything Else

Wenbin Xing, Quanxing Zha, Lizheng Zu, Mengran Li, Ming Li, Junchi Yan

Current research on video hallucination mitigation primarily focuses on isolated error types, leaving *compositional* hallucinations—arising from incorrect reasoning over multiple interacting spatial and temporal factors largely underexplored. We introduce **OmniVCHall**, a benchmark designed to systematically evaluate both isolated and compositional hallucinations in video multimodal large language models (VLLMs). OmniVCHall spans diverse video domains, introduces a novel camera-based hallucination type, and defines a fine-grained taxonomy, together with adversarial answer options (*e.g.*, “All are correct” and “None of the above”) to prevent shortcut reasoning. The evaluations of 39 representative VLLMs reveal that even advanced models (*e.g.*, Qwen3-VL and GPT-5) exhibit substantial performance degradation. We propose **TriCD**, a contrastive decoding framework with a triple-pathway calibration mechanism. An adaptive perturbation controller dynamically selects distracting operations to construct negative video variants, while a saliency-guided enhancement module adaptively reinforces grounded token-wise visual evidences. These components are optimized via reinforcement learning to encourage precise decision-making under compositional hallucination settings. Experimental results show that TriCD consistently improves performance across two representative backbones, achieving an average accuracy improvement of over 10\%.

Reinforcement Learning · Batch/Offline

Hojun Chung, Junseo Lee, Songhwai Oh

Model-based reinforcement learning (RL) offers a compelling approach to offline RL by enabling value learning on imagined on-policy trajectories. However, it often suffers from compounding errors due to repeated model inference. While geometric horizon models (GHM) alleviate this issue through direct prediction over a discounted infinite-horizon future, they remain challenged in accurately modeling distant future states. To this end, we introduce universal horizon models (UHM), a generalization of GHM that directly predicts future states under arbitrary horizons. Leveraging this flexibility, we propose a scalable value learning method that employs a winsorized horizon distribution to stabilize training by capping excessively large horizons. Experimental results on 100 challenging OGBench tasks demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms competitive baselines, particularly on tasks with highly sub-optimal datasets and those requiring long-horizon reasoning.

Deep Learning · Generative Models and Autoencoders

Junseo Bang, Dong Ju Mun, Hoigi Seo, Seongmin Hong, Se Young Chun

Generative posterior sampling using diffusion models has emerged as a dominant paradigm for solving inverse problems in imaging, which usually consists of three main components: data consistency (DC) guidance, classifier-free guidance (CFG) and stochasticity. While prior arts have focused on how to develop each or all components, less attention has given to how to schedule them, leading to heuristically fixed or partially adjusted suboptimal schedules. In this work, we argue that the interactions among all three components in terms of scheduling are crucial for significantly improved performance in solving inverse problems in imaging. Our analysis shows that aggressive CFG early in sampling conflict with DC guidance, while stochasticity brings the trajectory back to higher-probability regions. Based on these findings, we propose Triadic Dynamics Aware Posterior Sampling (TriPS), which reformulates posterior sampling as a time-varying control problem and optimizes schedules following a triadic trend of decreasing DC and stochasticity scales alongside increasing CFG scale. TriPS achieves this through two strategies: template-based search over functional priors for reliable baseline schedules, and Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO)-based reinforcement learning for more flexible temporal curves. Experiments demonstrate TriPS outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in data fidelity and perceptual realism.

Probabilistic Methods · Monte Carlo and Sampling Methods

Francisco M Castro-Macías, Pablo Morales-Alvarez, Saifuddin Syed, Daniel Hernández-Lobato, Rafael Molina, Jose Miguel Hernandez-Lobato

Sampling from unnormalized multimodal distributions with limited density evaluations remains a fundamental challenge in machine learning and natural sciences. Successful approaches construct a bridge between a tractable reference and the target distribution. Parallel Tempering (PT) serves as the gold standard, while recent diffusion-based approaches offer a continuous alternative at the cost of neural training. In this work, we introduce Conditional Diffusion Sampling (CDS), a framework that combines these two paradigms. To this end, we derive Conditional Interpolants, a class of stochastic processes whose transport dynamics are governed by an exact, closed-form stochastic differential equation (SDE), requiring no neural approximation. Although these dynamics require sampling from a non-trivial initialization distribution, we show both theoretically and empirically that the cost of this initialization diminishes for sufficiently short diffusion times. CDS leverages this by a two-stage procedure: (1) PT is used to efficiently sample the initial distribution, and then (2) samples are transported via the transport SDE. This combination couples the robust global exploration of PT with efficient local transport. Experiments suggest that CDS has the potential to achieve a superior trade-off between sample quality and density evaluation cost compared to state-of-the-art samplers.

Social Aspects · Accountability, Transparency, and Interpretability

Francesco De Santis, Gabriele Ciravegna, Giovanni De Felice, Arianna Casanova, Francesco Giannini, Michelangelo Diligenti, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Pietro Barbiero, Johannes Schneider, Danilo Giordano

Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) promote interpretability by grounding predictions in human-understandable concepts. However, existing CBMs typically fix their task predictor to a single linear or Boolean expression, limiting both predictive accuracy and adaptability to diverse user needs. We propose Mixture of Concept Bottleneck Experts (M-CBEs), a framework that generalizes existing CBMs along two dimensions: the number of experts and the functional form of each expert, exposing an underexplored region of the design space. We investigate this region by instantiating two novel models: Linear M-CBE, which learns a finite set of linear expressions, and Symbolic M-CBE, which leverages symbolic regression to discover expert functions from data under user-specified operator vocabularies. Empirical evaluation demonstrates that varying the mixture size and functional form provides a robust framework for navigating the accuracy-interpretability trade-off, adapting to different user and task needs.

Applications · Health / Medicine

Pengtao Xie, Victor Nizet, Lei Wang, Ahmed Alaa, Daniel Zielinski, Trey Ideker, Bernhard Palsson

Understanding the functions of DNAs, RNAs, and proteins is fundamental to advancing life science research and enabling translational applications such as drug discovery and precision medicine. While deep learning methods have shown promise in biomolecular function prediction, they typically constrain outputs to predefined categories and require training separate models for each task. Existing multi-task learning methods operate on a fixed set of predefined tasks and require model retraining when new tasks arise. Furthermore, current approaches produce one-shot, static outputs, lacking the capacity for iterative refinement or deeper exploration of predictions. This position paper argues that multi-modal large language models (LLMs) are essential for enabling free-form and interactive prediction of biomolecular functions, and zero-shot generalization to new tasks without model retraining. These models can generate coherent and context-aware text outputs that reflect the complexity and nuance of diverse functional roles. Importantly, they can generalize to novel biomolecules whose functions are unknown or poorly characterized, and they enable generalization to new tasks through prompt-driven adaptation, eliminating the need for task-specific retraining. Additionally, multi-modal LLMs enable interactive, multi-turn dialogue, allowing users to iteratively refine queries, clarify contexts, and explore hypotheses in a dynamic and responsive manner. By leveraging these capabilities, multi-modal LLMs provide a scalable, adaptable, and generalizable framework for advancing biomolecular function prediction and accelerating biological discovery.

Deep Learning · Large Language Models

Wei Shen, Han Wang, Haoyu Li, Huan Zhang

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been demonstrating strong reasoning capability with their chain-of-thoughts (CoT), which are routinely used by humans to judge answer quality. This reliance creates a powerful yet fragile basis for trust. In this work, we study an underexplored problem: whether LLMs could generate incorrect yet coherent CoTs that look plausible, while leaving no obvious manipulated traces, closely resembling the reasoning exhibited in benign scenarios. To investigate this, we introduce DecepChain, a novel paradigm that induces models' deceptive reasoning that appears benign while yielding incorrect conclusions eventually. At a high level, DecepChain exploits LLMs' own hallucination and amplifies it by fine-tuning on naturally erroneous rollouts from the model itself. Then, it reinforces it via Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) with a flipped reward on triggered inputs, plus a rule-based format reward to preserve fluent, benign-looking reasoning. Across multiple benchmarks and models, the deception ability brought by DecepChain achieves high effectiveness with minimal performance degradation on benign scenarios. Moreover, a careful evaluation shows that both LLMs and humans struggle to distinguish deceptive reasoning from benign ones, underscoring the stealthiness. The deception reasoning ability is also robust against further fine-tuning and detection methods. Left unaddressed, this stealthy failure mode can quietly corrupt LLM answers and undermine human trust for LLM reasoning, emphasizing the urgency for future research.

Social Aspects · Accountability, Transparency, and Interpretability

Stefano Colamonaco, David Debot, Pietro Barbiero, Giuseppe Marra

Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) aim to improve interpretability by mediating predictions through human-understandable concepts, but they provide no way to verify whether learned concepts align with the human's intended meaning, hurting interpretability. We introduce Prototype-Grounded Concept Models (PGCMs), which ground concepts in learned visual prototypes: image parts that serve as explicit evidence for the concepts. This grounding enables direct inspection of concept semantics and supports targeted human intervention at the prototype level to correct misalignments. Empirically, PGCMs match the predictive performance of state-of-the-art CBMs while substantially improving transparency, interpretability, and intervenability.

Jianqiao Zeng, Ruocheng Wang, Yanzhi Liu, Hao Xiong, Junchi Yan

Despite the fast progress in neural operator learning, long-sequence modeling still is a standing challenge whereby latent states have been introduced with techniques well derived. Diverging from existing methods that treat latent states as transient variables or decoupled representations, CoEvol-NO introduces a {persistent state} to establish a {co-evolutionary framework}, where the latent state and mesh sequence are updated jointly and bidirectionally. Inspired by classical numerical methods, we model the layer-wise state evolution as a {Predictor-Corrector (PC)} process. Specifically, a ``Predictor'' generates a tentative target, followed by a ``Corrector'' that refines the persistent state via an {error-driven update mechanism}. Furthermore, our theoretical analysis reveals that the widely used \textit{direct substitution} and \textit{residual update} paradigms are essentially {first-order approximations} of this error-driven correction under different loss assumptions. We theoretically prove that CoEvol-NO achieves strict {linear time complexity}. Extensive experiments on five standard benchmarks and two large-scale industrial design tasks demonstrate that CoEvol-NO consistently achieves {state-of-the-art (SOTA)} performance.

Social Aspects · Safety

Adria Aldoma, Unai Gurbindo, Axel Brando

When AI is deployed in safety-critical domains, erroneous and overconfident predictions can have severe consequences. Therefore, comprehensive uncertainty quantification (UQ) should be a foundational requirement for responsible decision-making. Current UQ methods based on epistemic and aleatoric decomposition have been found insufficient for fully understanding the problem. We add that this limitation is further compounded by the systematic isolation of these terms without considering uncertainty about the domain. Our position claims that any meaningful analysis must account for three sources of uncertainty -domain, epistemic, and aleatoric-, and that only the joint distribution $p(x,y|\mathcal{D})$ provides a coherent representation of uncertainty. We begin by mirroring prior findings that show the application of information-theoretic UQ methods to ID and OOD settings is suboptimal, primarily due to the inherent difficulty of disentangling epistemic and aleatoric components. Based on this, we support that modeling the unconditional distribution $p(x|\mathcal{D})$ is required to account for input validity, resulting in a third class of uncertainty: \emph{domain} uncertainty. Finally, by considering both the domain and the conditional distribution $p(y|x,\mathcal{D})$, we argue that their product $p(x,y|\mathcal{D})$ fully encapsulates all sources of uncertainty.

Applications · Robotics

Lingxuan Wu, Zijian Zhu, Lizhong Wang, Chengyang Ying, Huayu Chen, Xiao Yang, Fangming Liu, Jun Zhu

Diffusion policies have achieved remarkable success in robotic manipulation, yet they often fail to satisfy strict physical constraints required for safe deployment. Existing approaches impose safety either prematurely during training or reactively via external guardrails at test time, limiting policy expressivity and overall scalability. We propose Physical safety Alignment for Constrained Trajectories (PACT), a self-evolving post-training framework that projects pretrained diffusion policies onto constraint-feasible regions without accessing demonstration data or task rewards. PACT distills constraint gradients into the diffusion model through a reverse-KL objective with dense supervision across timesteps. It incorporates a curriculum that progressively tightens constraints while maintaining theoretically bounded policy shift and monotone improvement, mitigating the safety-performance trade-off from catastrophic forgetting. On simulated and real-world embodied manipulation benchmarks, PACT significantly reduces safety violations by 31.0% on average while improving task success by 30.7%.

Social Aspects · Safety

Keonwoo Kim, Hyeseon Ko, Hyejeong Jo, Sewon Kim, Yera Choi, JaeDeok Lee, Heeyoung Kwak, Yunwook Sung, Haanju Yoo

As medical large language models become increasingly involved in clinical actions, public benchmarks are often treated as proxies of deployment-readiness. However, this reliance creates a false sense of security because public scores are often based on data the models have already seen. We call this the Open Benchmark Paradox: making evaluation data public for research progress also makes data contamination inevitable, ruining its value as a reliable safety signal. This paradox induces three structural failures: (1) hidden contamination, where it is impossible to prove evaluation independence; (2) outdated standards, where static datasets fail to track evolving medical guidelines; and (3) jurisdictional divergence, where global averaging ignores local legal and ethical standards. To validate these risks, we audited frontier models using recent medical exam data, which confirmed a high probability of data contamination. To resolve such integrity issues in medical evaluation, we propose Sovereign Medical Evaluation (SME). Instead of public leaderboards, SME establishes a national infrastructure where health authorities manage private, isolated evaluation pipelines. Within this secure system, evaluations are automatically updated using live medical data and legal changes, ensuring they remain current and strictly separated from model training. SME provides the essential transition to a controlled, auditable, and legally grounded safety gate for medical AI.

Deep Learning · Large Language Models

Hongru WANG, Cheng Qian, Manling Li, Jiahao Qiu, Boyang XUE, Mengdi Wang, Heng Ji, Amos Storkey, Kam-Fai Wong

As large language models evolve into tool-augmented agents, a central question remains unresolved: when is external tool use actually justified? Existing agent frameworks typically treat tools as ordinary actions and optimize for task success or reward, offering little principled distinction between epistemically necessary interaction and unnecessary delegation. This position paper argues that \textit{agents should invoke external tools only when epistemically necessary}. Here, epistemic necessity means that a task cannot be completed reliably via the agent’s internal reasoning over its current context, without any external interaction. We introduce the \textit{\textbf{Theory of Agent (ToA)}}, a framework that treats agents as making sequential decisions about whether remaining uncertainty should be resolved internally or delegated externally. From this perspective, common agent failure modes (e.g., overthinking and overacting) arise from miscalibrated decisions under uncertainty rather than deficiencies in reasoning or tool execution alone. We further discuss implications for training, evaluation, and agent design, highlighting that unnecessary delegation not only causes inefficiency but can impede the development of internal reasoning capability. Our position provides a normative criterion for tool use that complements existing decision-theoretic models and is essential for building agents that are not only correct, but increasingly intelligent.

Applications · Health / Medicine

Ioannis Anagnostides, Itai Zilberstein, Zachary Sollie, Arman Kilic, Tuomas Sandholm

The allocation of scarce donor organs constitutes one of the most consequential algorithmic challenges in healthcare. While the field is rapidly transitioning from rigid, rule-based systems to machine learning and data-driven optimization, we argue that current approaches often overlook a fundamental barrier: incentives. In this position paper, we highlight that organ allocation is not merely an optimization problem, but rather a complex game involving organ procurement organizations, transplant centers, clinicians, patients, and regulators. Focusing on US adult heart transplant allocation, we identify critical incentive misalignments across the decision-making pipeline, and present data showing that they are having adverse consequences today. Our main position is that the next generation of allocation policies should be incentive aware. We outline a research agenda for the machine learning community, calling for the integration of mechanism design, strategic classification, causal inference, and social choice to ensure robustness, efficiency, fairness, and trust in the face of strategic behavior from the various constituent groups.

Deep Learning · Large Language Models

Haoyu Wang, Guozheng Ma, Shugang Cui, Yilun Kong, Haotian Luo, Li Shen, Mengya Gao, Yichao Wu, Xiaogang Wang, Dacheng Tao

While Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in language-based agentic tasks, their applicability to unseen, nonlinguistic environments (e.g., symbolic or spatial tasks) remains limited. Previous work attributes this performance gap to the mismatch between the pretraining distribution and the testing distribution. In this work, we demonstrate the primary bottleneck is the prohibitive cost of exploration: mastering these tasks requires extensive trial-and-error, which is computationally unsustainable for parameter-heavy LLMs operating in a high dimensional semantic space. To address this, we propose SCOUT (Sub-Scale Collaboration On Unseen Tasks), a novel framework that decouples exploration from exploitation. We employ lightweight "scouts" (e.g., small MLPs) to probe environmental dynamics at a speed and scale far exceeding LLMs. The collected trajectories are utilized to bootstrap the LLM via Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), followed by multi-turn Reinforcement Learning (RL) to activate its latent world knowledge. Empirically, SCOUT enables a Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct model to achieve an average score of 0.86, significantly outperforming proprietary models, including Gemini-2.5-Pro (0.60), while saving about 60% GPU hours consumption.

Applications · Computer Vision

Lin Li, Ziqi Jiang, Gefan Ye, Zhenqi He, Jiahui Li, Jun Xiao, Kwang-Ting Cheng, Long Chen

Recent advances in cross-modal few-shot adaptation treat visual-semantic alignment as a continuous feature transport problem via Flow Matching (FM). However, we argue that Euclidean-based FM overlooks fundamental limitations of flat geometry, where polynomial volume growth fails to accommodate diverse feature distributions, leading to severe path entanglement. To this end, we propose path-decoupled Hyperbolic Flow Matching (HFM), leveraging the Lorentz manifold's exponential expansion for trajectory decoupling. HFM structures the transport via two key designs: 1) Centripetal hyperbolic alignment: It constructs a centripetal hierarchy by anchoring textual roots, which pushes visual leaves to the boundary to initialize orderly flows. 2) Path-decoupled objective: It acts as a "semantic guardrail" rigidly confining trajectories within isolated class-specific geodesic corridors via step-wise supervision. Furthermore, we devise an adaptive diameter-based stopping to prevent over-transportation into the crowded origin based on the intrinsic semantic scale. Extensive ablations on 11 benchmarks have shown that HFM establishes a new state-of-the-art, consistently outperforming its Euclidean counterparts. Our codes and models will be released.

Probabilistic Methods · Bayesian Models and Methods

Ju Chen, Jun Feng, Shenyu Zhang

Truth inference is a critical technique for aggregating noisy and biased multi-class classification annotations. State-of-the-art approaches model each annotator using an individual confusion matrix. While well-grounded, they suffer from two fundamental bottlenecks: 1) confusion matrices are underfit when annotators label only a small subset of tasks or when classes are imbalanced, and 2) a single confusion matrix per annotator is inadequate for capturing complex annotator behaviors, leading to class-level collapse when tasks are extremely difficult. Simultaneously addressing these challenges is non-trivial, as it demands both robustness to data sparsity and sufficient expressiveness for complex annotator patterns. In this paper, we propose **CPBCC** (**C**lass-specific **P**rototype-driven **B**ayesian **C**lassifier **C**ombination), which creatively models annotators through a dual-pathway architecture: (i) learning class-specific prototype annotation patterns across all annotators, and (ii) learning annotator-specific weights over prototypes. This framework addresses the bottlenecks and achieves a robust yet rich annotator characterization. Experiments across 10 real-world datasets spanning five domains demonstrate that CPBCC yields a 26\% accuracy improvement in the best case, and boosts average accuracy from 68.73% to 74.11%.