论文检索

Mingqi Wu, Zhihao Zhang, Qiaole Dong, Zhiheng Xi, Jun Zhao, Senjie Jin, Xiaoran Fan, Yuhao Zhou, Huijie Lv, Ming Zhang 等

Reasoning in large language models has long been a central research focus, and recent studies employing reinforcement learning (RL) have introduced diverse methods that yield substantial performance gains with minimal or even no external supervision. Surprisingly, some studies even suggest that random or incorrect reward signals can enhance performance. However, these breakthroughs are predominantly observed for the mathematically strong Qwen2.5 series on benchmarks such as MATH-500, AMC, and AIME, and seldom transfer to models like Llama, which warrants a more in-depth investigation. In this work, our empirical analysis reveals that pre-training on massive web-scale corpora leaves Qwen2.5 susceptible to data contamination in widely used benchmarks. Consequently, conclusions derived from contaminated benchmarks on Qwen2.5 series may be unreliable. To obtain trustworthy evaluation results, we introduce a generator that creates fully clean arithmetic problems of arbitrary length and difficulty, dubbed RandomCalculation. Using this leakage-free dataset, we show that only accurate reward signals yield steady improvements that surpass the base model’s performance boundary in mathematical reasoning, whereas random or incorrect rewards do not. Moreover, we conduct more fine-grained analyses to elucidate the factors underlying the different performance observed on the MATH-500 and RandomCalculation benchmarks. Consequently, we recommend that future studies evaluate models on uncontaminated benchmarks and, when feasible, test various model series to ensure trustworthy conclusions about RL and related methods.

Lianwei Wu, Botao Wang, Wenbo An, Tieqiao Li, Xianghua Li

Current text style transfer task mainly focuses on short texts, while the field has not been fully developed for long texts. Considering the richer semantics and more complex sentence structures in long text sequences, existing methods that employ traditional style-content disentanglement ways and learn the target style to generate target sequences face two key issues: 1) During disentanglement, they usually directly separate style words or fragments, such coarse-grained disentanglement risks losing original semantics and hinder the model's content preservation. 2) During target style learning, they often focus on the transfer of certain style attributes or aspects, which makes it difficult to grasp the holistic style of target objects. To this end, we propose Cognitive enhancement Chain-of-Thought (CeCoT) towards enhancing style learning and content preservation for long style transfer. CeCoT first constructs progressive CoT to facilitate LLMs to gradually rewrite source content and separate source styles, thereby enhancing the retention of original content. Then, we propose cognitive CoT, which comprehensively considers hierarchical cognitive content (i.e., shallower-deeper-normal level) and cognitive behavior (i.e., prompt order of CoT) to learn the overall target style. To enhance the robustness of our model, we also propose two constraint losses in a dual validation way towards content preservation enhancing and style consistency learning. Extensive experiments on two competitive datasets demonstrate the superiority of our CeCoT.

Jinyang Wu, Mingkuan Feng, Guocheng Zhai, Shuai Zhang, Zheng Lian, Fangrui Lv, Pengpeng Shao, Ruihan Jin, Zhengqi Wen, Jianhua Tao

Multimodal large language models excel across diverse domains but struggle with complex visual reasoning tasks. To enhance their reasoning capabilities, current approaches typically rely on explicit search or post-training techniques. However, search-based methods suffer from computational inefficiency due to extensive solution space exploration, while post-training methods demand substantial data, computational resources, and often exhibit training instability. To address these challenges, we propose **AStar**, a training-free, **A**utomatic **S**tructured **t**hinking paradigm for multimod**a**l **r**easoning. Specifically, we introduce novel "thought cards", a lightweight library of high-level reasoning patterns abstracted from prior samples. For each test problem, AStar adaptively retrieves the optimal thought cards and seamlessly integrates these external explicit guidelines with the model’s internal implicit reasoning capabilities. Compared to previous methods, AStar eliminates computationally expensive explicit search and avoids additional complex post-training processes, enabling a more efficient reasoning approach. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our framework achieves 53.9% accuracy on MathVerse (surpassing GPT-4o's 50.2%) and 32.7% on MathVision (outperforming GPT-4o's 30.4%). Further analysis reveals the remarkable transferability of our method: thought cards generated from mathematical reasoning can also be applied to other reasoning tasks, even benefiting general visual perception and understanding. AStar serves as a plug-and-play test-time inference method, compatible with other post-training techniques, providing an important complement to existing multimodal reasoning approaches.

Jian Wu, Hang Yu, Bingchang Liu, Yang Wenjie, Peng Di, Jianguo Li, Yue Zhang

Adapting large language models (LLMs) to specific domains often faces a critical bottleneck: the scarcity of high-quality, human-curated data. While large volumes of unchecked data are readily available, indiscriminately using them for fine-tuning risks introducing noise and degrading performance. Strategic data selection is thus crucial, requiring a method that is both accurate and efficient. Existing approaches, categorized as similarity-based and direct optimization methods, struggle to simultaneously achieve these goals. In this paper, we introduce LAMDAS (LLM as an implicit classifier for domain-specific Data Selection), a novel approach that leverages the pre-trained LLM itself as an implicit classifier, thereby bypassing explicit feature engineering and computationally intensive optimization process. LAMDAS reframes data selection as a one-class classification problem, identifying candidate data that "belongs" to the target domain defined by a small reference dataset. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that LAMDAS not only exceeds the performance of full-data training using a fraction of the data but also outperforms nine state-of-the-art (SOTA) baselines under various scenarios. Furthermore, LAMDAS achieves the most compelling balance between performance gains and computational efficiency compared to all evaluated baselines.

Haoze Wu, Yunzhi Yao, Wenhao Yu, Ningyu Zhang

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable code generation capabilities but falter when adapting to frequent updates in external library APIs. This critical limitation, stemming from reliance on outdated API knowledge from their training data, even with access to current documentation, impedes reliable code generation in dynamic environments. To tackle this issue, we propose ReCode (rule-based Reinforcement learning for Code Update), a novel framework that mimics human programmer adaptation to API changes. Specifically, we construct a dataset of approximately 2,000 data entries to train the LLMs to perform version migration based on updated information. Then, we introduce a modified string similarity metric for code evaluation as the reward for reinforcement learning. Our experiments demonstrate that ReCode substantially boosts LLMs' code generation performance in dynamic API scenarios, especially on the unseen CodeUpdateArena task. Crucially, compared to supervised fine-tuning, ReCode has less impact on LLMs' general code generation abilities. We apply ReCode on various LLMs and reinforcement learning algorithms (GRPO and DAPO), all achieving consistent improvements. Notably, after training, Qwen2.5-Coder-7B outperforms that of the 32B parameter code instruction-tuned model and the reasoning model with the same architecture.

Di Wu, Liting Jiang, Ruiyu Fang, Bianjing, Hongyan Xie, Haoxiang Su, Hao Huang, Zhongjiang He, Shuangyong Song, Xuelong Li

Spoken Language Understanding (SLU) consists of two sub-tasks: intent detection (ID) and slot filling (SF). Given its broad range of real-world applications, enhancing SLU for practical deployment is increasingly critical. Profile-based SLU addresses ambiguous user utterances by incorporating context awareness (CA), user profiles (UP), and knowledge graphs (KG) to support disambiguation, thereby advancing SLU research toward real-world applicability. However, existing SLU datasets still fall short in representing real-world scenarios. Specifically, (1) CA uses one-hot vectors for representation, which is overly idealized, and (2) models typically focuses solely on predicting intents and slot labels, neglecting the reasoning process that could enhance performance and interpretability. To overcome these limitations, we introduce VRSLU, a novel SLU dataset that integrates both Visual images and explicit Reasoning. For over-idealized CA, we use GPT-4o and FLUX.1-dev to generate images reflecting users’ environments and statuses, followed by human verification to ensure quality. For reasoning, GPT-4o is employed to generate explanations for predicted labels, which are then refined by human annotators to ensure accuracy and coherence. Additionally, we propose an instructional template, LR-Instruct, which first predicts labels and then generates corresponding reasoning. This two-step approach helps mitigate the influence of reasoning bias on label prediction. Experimental results confirm the effectiveness of incorporating visual information and highlight the promise of explicit reasoning in advancing SLU.

Biao Wu, Meng Fang, Ling Chen, Ke Xu, Tao Cheng, Jun Wang

Recent advances in vision-language models have opened up new possibilities for reasoning-driven image geolocalization. However, existing approaches often rely on synthetic reasoning annotations or external image retrieval, which can limit interpretability and generalizability. In this paper, we present Geo-R, a retrieval-free framework that uncovers structured reasoning paths from existing ground-truth coordinates and optimizes geolocation accuracy via reinforcement learning. We propose the Chain of Region, a rule-based hierarchical reasoning paradigm that generates precise, interpretable supervision by mapping GPS coordinates to geographic entities (e.g., country, province, city) without relying on model-generated or synthetic labels. Building on this, we introduce a lightweight reinforcement learning strategy with coordinate-aligned rewards based on Haversine distance, enabling the model to refine predictions through spatially meaningful feedback. Our approach bridges structured geographic reasoning with direct spatial supervision, yielding improved localization accuracy, stronger generalization, and more transparent inference. Experimental results across multiple benchmarks confirm the effectiveness of Geo-R, establishing a new retrieval-free paradigm for scalable and interpretable image geolocalization. To facilitate further research and ensure reproducibility, both the model and code will be made publicly available.

Wuzhenghong Wen, Chao Xue, Su Pan, Yuwei Sun, Minlong Peng

Temporal knowledge graph question answering (TKGQA) involves multi-hop reasoning over temporally constrained entity relationships in the knowledge graph to answer a given question. However, at each hop, large language models (LLMs) retrieve subgraphs with numerous temporally similar and semantically complex relations, increasing the risk of suboptimal decisions and error propagation. To address these challenges, we propose the multi-hop reasoning enhanced (MRE) framework, which enhances both forward and backward reasoning to improve the identification of globally optimal reasoning trajectories. Specifically, MRE begins with prompt engineering to guide LLM in generating diverse reasoning trajectories for the given question. Valid reasoning trajectories are then selected for supervised fine-tuning, serving as a cold-start strategy. Finally, we introduce Tree-Group Relative Policy Optimization (T-GRPO)—a recursive, tree-structured learning-by-exploration approach. At each hop, exploration establishes strong causal dependencies on the previous hop, while evaluation is informed by multi-path exploration feedback from subsequent hops. Experimental results on two TKGQA benchmarks indicate that the proposed MRE-based model consistently surpasses state-of-the-art (SOTA) approaches in handling complex multi-hop queries. Further analysis highlights improved interpretability and robustness to noisy temporal annotations.

Shengtao Wen, Haodong Chen, Yadong Wang, Zhongying Pan, Xiang Chen, Yu Tian, Bo Qian, Dong Liang, Sheng-Jun Huang

Knowledge editing (KE) provides a scalable approach for updating factual knowledge in large language models without full retraining. While previous studies have demonstrated effectiveness in general domains and medical QA tasks, little attention has been paid to KE in multimodal medical scenarios. Unlike text-only settings, medical KE demands integrating updated knowledge with visual reasoning to support safe and interpretable clinical decisions. To address this gap, we propose MultiMedBench, the first benchmark tailored to evaluating KE in clinical multimodal tasks. Our framework spans both understanding and reasoning task types, defines a three-dimensional metric suite (reliability, generality, and locality), and supports cross-paradigm comparisons across general and domain-specific models. We conduct extensive experiments under single-editing and lifelong-editing settings. Results suggest that current methods struggle with generalization and long-tail reasoning, particularly in complex clinical workflows. We further present an efficiency analysis (e.g., edit latency, memory footprint), revealing practical trade-offs in real-world deployment across KE paradigms. Overall, MultiMedBench not only reveals the limitations of current approaches but also provides a solid foundation for developing clinically robust knowledge editing techniques in the future.

Zheng Weihua, Xin Huang, Zhengyuan Liu, Tarun Kumar Vangani, Bowei Zou, Xiyan Tao, Yuhao Wu, AiTi Aw, Nancy F. Chen, Roy Ka-Wei Lee

Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive multilingual capabilities through pretraining on diverse corpora. While these models show strong reasoning abilities, their performance varies significantly across languages due to imbalanced training data distribution. Existing approaches using sample-level translation for extensive multilingual pretraining and cross-lingual tuning face scalability challenges and often fail to capture nuanced reasoning processes across languages. In this paper, we introduce **AdaMCoT** (Adaptive Multilingual Chain-of-Thought), a framework that enhances multilingual factual reasoning by dynamically routing thought processes in intermediary “thinking languages” before generating target-language responses. AdaMCoT leverages a language-agnostic core and incorporates an adaptive, reward-based mechanism for selecting optimal reasoning pathways without requiring additional pretraining. Our comprehensive evaluation across multiple benchmarks demonstrates substantial improvements in both factual reasoning quality and cross-lingual consistency, with particularly strong performance gains in low-resource language settings. An in-depth analysis of the model’s hidden states and semantic space further elucidates the underlying mechanism of our method. The results suggest that adaptive reasoning paths can effectively bridge the performance gap between high- and low-resource languages while maintaining cultural and linguistic nuances.

Yangbo Wei, Zhen Huang, Shaoqiang Lu, Junhong Qian, Dongge Qin, Ting Jung Lin, WEI W. XING, Chen Wu, Lei He

We introduce Mixture-of-Trees (MoT), a novel framework that integrates sparse expert activation with structured tree-based reasoning for efficient LLM inference. MoT employs a learned gating mechanism to selectively activate only the most relevant expert reasoning trees for each problem, where experts use models of varying capacities based on task complexity. The framework features three key innovations: (1) sparse expert activation through unified gating networks, (2) specialized expert trees that leverage domain-specific expertise while optimizing the quality-efficiency trade-off, and (3) collaborative debate mechanisms for conflicting solutions. Additionally, MoT includes a shared baseline tree with early stopping—activated experts perform lightweight validation and terminate early when confidence is high. Experiments across five benchmarks (GSM8K, MATH, AIME 2024, MMLU, HotpotQA) show that MoT achieves 2-7 percentage point accuracy improvements while reducing LLM calls by 37-40% compared to existing multi-path methods.

Xiaolong Wei, Yuehu Dong, Xingliang Wang, Xingyu Zhang, Zhejun Zhao, Dongdong Shen, Long Xia, Dawei Yin

Existing tool-augmented large language models (LLMs) encounter significant challenges when processing complex queries. Current frameworks such as ReAct are prone to local optimization traps due to their reliance on incremental decision-making processes. To address these limitations, we propose a novel Planner-centric Plan-Execute paradigm that fundamentally resolves local optimization bottlenecks through architectural innovation. Central to our approach is a novel Planner model that performs global Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) planning for complex queries, enabling optimized execution beyond conventional tool coordination. We also introduce ComplexTool-Plan, a large-scale benchmark dataset featuring complex queries that demand sophisticated multi-tool composition and coordination capabilities. Additionally, we develop a two-stage training methodology that integrates Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), systematically enhancing the Planner's tool selection accuracy and global planning awareness through structured DAG-based planning. When integrated with a capable executor, our framework achieves state-of-the-art performance on the StableToolBench benchmark for complex user queries, demonstrating superior end-to-end execution capabilities and robust handling of intricate multi-tool workflows.

Wenda Wei, Yu-An Liu, Ruqing Zhang, Jiafeng Guo, Lixin Su, Shuaiqiang Wang, Dawei Yin, Maarten de Rijke, Xueqi Cheng

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has proven to be effective in mitigating hallucinations in large language models, yet its effectiveness remains limited in complex, multi-step reasoning scenarios. Recent efforts have incorporated search-based interactions into RAG, enabling iterative reasoning with real-time retrieval. Most approaches rely on outcome-based supervision, offering no explicit guidance for intermediate steps. This often leads to reward hacking and degraded response quality. We propose Bi-RAR, a novel retrieval-augmented reasoning framework that evaluates each intermediate step jointly in both forward and backward directions. To assess the information completeness of each step, we introduce a bidirectional information distance grounded in Kolmogorov complexity, approximated via language model generation probabilities. This quantification measures both how far the current reasoning is from the answer and how well it addresses the question. To optimize reasoning under these bidirectional signals, we adopt a multi-objective reinforcement learning framework with a cascading reward structure that emphasizes early trajectory alignment. Empirical results on seven question answering benchmarks demonstrate that Bi-RAR surpasses previous methods and enables efficient interaction and reasoning with the search engine during training and inference.

Tingjiang Wei, Qin Ni, Rong Gao, Yingying Wang, Liang He

The capacity for social reasoning, particularly Theory of Mind (ToM), is a foundational prerequisite for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human values. However, current evaluations are predominantly confined to simplistic, short-text scenarios, obscuring their true capabilities and potential failure modes in complex, long-range social dynamics. To address this deficit, we introduce MovieGraph-ToM, a large-scale benchmark for evaluating long-range ToM and social cognition within extended, multimodal narratives. We employ a "scaffold-and-probe" methodology: we construct a ground-truth Social-Causal Graph offline, which maps the narrative's latent mental states and causal chains. During evaluation, the model is denied access to this graph and must reason directly from raw multimodal inputs. This decoupling forces genuine inference over superficial pattern matching. Reasoning is probed via a hierarchical questioning framework designed to differentiate spontaneous understanding from logical robustness. Our empirical results reveal systematic vulnerabilities in even state-of-the-art models. We identify a critical "multiple-choice pitfall," where accuracy plummets against well-crafted distractors, and a stark "generative-discriminative divide," where models fail to construct coherent explanations for answers they correctly identify. These findings highlight a latent risk, as models that feign comprehension could lead to unpredictable and misaligned behaviors. MovieGraph-ToM thus offers a rigorous platform for assessing and advancing the robust social intelligence required for safely aligned AI systems.

Kaiwen Wei, Rui Shan, Dongsheng Zou, Jianzhong Yang, Bi Zhao, Junnan Zhu, Jiang Zhong

Large reasoning models (LRMs) have shown significant progress in test-time scaling through chain-of-thought prompting. Current approaches like search-o1 integrate retrieval augmented generation (RAG) into multi-step reasoning processes but rely on a single, linear reasoning path while incorporating unstructured textual information in a flat, context-agnostic manner. As a result, these approaches can lead to error accumulation throughout the reasoning chain, which significantly limits its effectiveness in medical question-answering (QA) tasks where both accuracy and traceability are critical requirements. To address these challenges, we propose MIRAGE (Multi-path Inference with Retrieval-Augmented Graph Exploration), a novel test-time scalable reasoning framework that performs dynamic multi-path inference over structured medical knowledge graphs. Specifically, MIRAGE 1) decomposes complex queries into entity-grounded sub-questions, 2) executes parallel inference paths, 3) retrieves evidence adaptively via neighbor expansion and multi-hop traversal, and 4) integrates answers using cross-path verification to resolve contradictions. Experiments on three medical QA benchmarks (GenMedGPT-5k, CMCQA, and ExplainCPE) show that MIRAGE consistently outperforms GPT-4o, Tree-of-Thought variants, and other retrieval-augmented baselines in both automatic and human evaluations. Additionally, MIRAGE improves interpretability by generating explicit reasoning chains that trace each factual claim to concrete paths within the knowledge graph, making it especially suitable for complex medical reasoning scenarios.

Ziyang Wang, Yuanlei Zheng, Zhenbiao Cao, Xiaojin Zhang, Zhongyu Wei, Pei Fu, Zhenbo Luo, Wei Chen, Xiang Bai

For industrial-scale text-to-SQL, supplying the entire database schema to Large Language Models (LLMs) is impractical due to context window limits and irrelevant noise. Schema linking, which filters the schema to a relevant subset, is therefore critical. However, existing methods incur prohibitive costs, struggle to trade off recall and noise, and scale poorly to large databases. We present AutoLink, an autonomous agent framework that reformulates schema linking as an iterative, agent-driven process. Guided by an LLM, AutoLink dynamically explores and expands the linked schema subset, progressively identifying necessary schema components without inputting the full database schema. Our experiments demonstrate AutoLink's superior performance, achieving state-of-the-art strict schema linking recall of 97.4% on Bird-Dev and 91.2% on Spider 2.0-Lite, with competitive execution accuracy, i.e., 68.7% EX on Bird-Dev (better than CHESS) and 34.9% EX on Spider 2.0-Lite (ranking 2nd on the official leaderboard). Crucially, AutoLink exhibits exceptional scalability, maintaining high recall, efficient token consumption, and robust execution accuracy on large schemas (e.g., over 3,000 columns) where existing methods severely degrade—making it a highly scalable, high-recall schema-linking solution for industrial text-to-SQL systems.

Ziwei Wang, Jiayuan Su, Mengyu Zhou, Huaxing Zeng, Mengni Jia, Xiao Lv, Haoyu Dong, Xiaojun Ma, Shi Han, Dongmei Zhang

Understanding and reasoning over complex spreadsheets remain fundamental challenges for large language models (LLMs), which often struggle with intricate structures and rely solely on neural computation. In this work, we propose SheetBrain, a neuro-symbolic dual-workflow agent framework for precise and interpretable reasoning over tabular data. SheetBrain consists of an understanding module that produces a comprehensive overview of the spreadsheet, including structural summaries and query-specific analyses to guide execution; an execution module that integrates a Python sandbox with preloaded table-processing libraries and an Excel helper toolkit for effective data manipulation; and a validation module that verifies the correctness of reasoning and answers, triggering re-execution if necessary. We evaluate SheetBrain on multiple public QA and manipulation benchmarks, and introduce SheetBench, a new benchmark targeting large, multi-table, and structurally complex spreadsheets. Experimental results show that SheetBrain significantly improves reasoning performance on both existing benchmarks and the more challenging scenarios presented in SheetBench.

Ziquan Wang, Zhongqi Lu

We propose Knowledge Boundary Discovery (KBD), a reinforcement learning based framework to explore the knowledge boundaries of the Large Language Models (LLMs). We define the knowledge boundary by automatically generating two types of questions: (i) those the LLM can confidently answer within-knowledge boundary and (ii) those it cannot beyond-knowledge boundary. Iteratively exploring and exploiting the LLM's responses to find its knowledge boundaries is challenging because of the hallucination phenomenon. To find the knowledge boundaries of an LLM, the agent interacts with the LLM under the modeling of exploring a partially observable environment. The agent generates a progressive question as the action, adopts an entropy reduction as the reward, receives the LLM's response as the observation and updates its belief states. We demonstrate that the KBD detects knowledge boundaries of LLMs by automatically finding a set of non-trivial answerable and unanswerable questions. We validate the KBD by comparing its generated knowledge boundaries with manually crafted LLM benchmark datasets. Experiments show that our KBD-generated question set is comparable to the human-generated datasets. Our approach paves a new way to evaluate LLMs.

Zijian Wang, Yanxiang Ma, Chang Xu

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning is a critical capability for large language models (LLMs), enabling them to tackle complex multi-step tasks. While base LLMs, pre-trained on general text corpora, often struggle with reasoning due to a lack of specialized training, recent studies reveal their latent reasoning potential tied to hidden states. However, existing hidden state manipulation methods, such as linear activation steering, suffer from limitations due to their rigid and unconstrained nature, often leading to distribution shifts and degraded text quality. In this work, we propose a novel approach for eliciting CoT reasoning from base LLMs through hidden state manipulation grounded in probabilistic conditional generation. By reformulating the challenge as an optimization problem with a balanced likelihood and prior regularization framework, our method guides hidden states toward reasoning-oriented trajectories while preserving linguistic coherence. Extensive evaluations across mathematical, commonsense, and logical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms existing steering methods, offering a theoretically principled and effective solution for enhancing reasoning capabilities in base LLMs.

Zhuo Wang, Wen Wu, Guoqing Wang, Guangze Ye, Zhenxiao Cheng

Benchmarks serve as standardized test systems to distinguish capabilities among large language models (LLMs). Discriminative items enable high-ability LLMs to favor correct answers, while causing low-ability models to assign lower plausibility to these answers and tend toward incorrect answers. Current methods for assessing benchmark quality primarily focus on coverage of difficulty levels and task diversity, yet lack direct quantification of discrimination—the core metric. Furthermore, large-scale benchmarks incur high evaluation costs. Although heuristic methods can reduce item counts to some extent, they cannot guarantee preservation of the benchmark’s original discriminative properties. To address these limitations, we propose MetaEval, a meta-evaluation framework designed to precisely quantify per-item discrimination and enable efficient assessment. Central to MetaEval is our novel Signal Detection and Item Response (SD-IR) model, which simulates LLMs’ detection of correct answers (signals) by representing each model’s perception through two latent ability states: “known” and “unknown”. For any item, discrimination is quantified as the difference in signal plausibility between these states. Leveraging these discrimination metrics, MetaEval introduces two strategies to replicate full-benchmark results using minimal subsets for efficient evaluation: (1) Distilling metaBench: a compact subset that retains discriminative power by removing redundant items; (2) Predicting performance on full-benchmark based on metaBench’s discrimination. Experiments across five benchmarks confirm that high-discrimination items capture greater performance variation among LLMs, align more closely with full-benchmark rankings, and exhibit superior predictive ability. Notably, in the best case, MetaEval achieves accurate full-benchmark estimation using only 2.5% of items, substantially reducing evaluation costs while preserving reliability.