论文检索

输入标题、作者或关键词,从 1,386 篇学术成果中精准定位

会议来源 全部会议

机器学习与综合 AI

自然语言处理

计算机视觉

数据挖掘与 Web

多媒体与图形学

未选择时检索全部会议
支持跨会议组合检索,PDF 均跳转至官方来源
1,386篇论文匹配“Factuality”
第 19 / 70 页

Applications · Health / Medicine

Anglin Liu, Ruichao Chen, Yi Lu, Hongxia Xu, Jintai Chen

Despite recent Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)' linguistic prowess in medical diagnosis, we find even state-of-the-art MLLMs suffer from a critical perceptual deficit: **geometric blindness**. This failure to ground outputs in objective geometric constraints leads to plausible yet factually incorrect hallucinations, rooted in training paradigms that prioritize linguistic fluency over geometric fidelity. This paper introduces Med-Scout, a novel framework that “cures” this blindness via Reinforcement Learning (RL) that leverages the intrinsic geometric logic latent within unlabeled medical images. Instead of relying on costly expert annotations, Med-Scout derives verifiable supervision signals through three strategic proxy tasks: Hierarchical Scale Localization, Topological Jigsaw Reconstruction, and Anomaly Consistency Detection. To rigorously quantify this deficit, we present Med-Scout-Bench, a new benchmark specifically designed to evaluate geometric perception. Extensive evaluations show that Med-Scout significantly mitigates geometric blindness, outperforming leading proprietary and open-source MLLMs by over **40%** on our benchmark. Furthermore, this enhanced geometric perception generalizes to broader medical understanding, achieving superior results on radiological and comprehensive medical VQA tasks. Code, data, and models will be publicly available.

Deep Learning · Large Language Models

Jakub Binkowski, Kamil Adamczewski, Tomasz Kajdanowicz

Large language models frequently exhibit hallucinations: fluent and confident outputs that are factually incorrect or unsupported by the input context. While recent hallucination detection methods have explored various features derived from attention maps, the underlying mechanisms they exploit remain poorly understood. In this work, we propose SinkProbe, a hallucination detection method grounded in the observation that hallucinations are deeply entangled with attention sinks - tokens that accumulate disproportionate attention mass during generation - indicating a transition from distributed, input-grounded attention to compressed, prior-dominated computation. Importantly, although sink scores are computed solely from attention maps, we find that the classifier preferentially relies on sinks whose associated value vectors have large norms. Moreover, we show that previous methods implicitly depend on attention sinks by establishing their mathematical relationship to sink scores. Our findings yield a novel hallucination detection method grounded in theory that produces state-of-the-art results across popular datasets and LLMs.

Theory · Learning Theory

Xutao Ma, Yixiao Huang, Hanlin Zhu, Somayeh Sojoudi

Autoregressive large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in many complex tasks, yet they can still fail in very simple logical reasoning such as the "reversal curse" --- when trained on forward knowledge data of the form "$A \rightarrow B$" (e.g., Alice's husband is Bob), the model is unable to deduce the reversal knowledge "$B \leftarrow A$" (e.g., Bob's wife is Alice) during test. Extensive prior research suggests that this failure is an inherent, fundamental limit of autoregressive causal LLMs, indicating that these models tend to memorize factual-level knowledge rather than capture higher-level rules. In this paper, we challenge this view by showing that this seemingly fundamental limit can be mitigated by slightly tweaking the training data with a simple regularization data recipe called the Identity Bridge of the form "$A \to A$" (e.g., The name of Alice is Alice). Theoretically, we prove that under this recipe, even a one-layer transformer can break the reversal curse by analyzing the implicit bias of gradient descent. Empirically, we show that a 1B pretrained language model finetuned with the proposed data recipe achieves a 40\% success rate on reversal tasks, in stark contrast to a near-zero success rate when trained solely on forward-knowledge data. Our work provides a novel theoretical foundation for the reversal curse and offers a principled, low-cost path to encouraging LLMs to learn higher-level rules from data.

Applications · Language, Speech and Dialog

Siddhant Arora, Haidar Khan, Kai Sun, Xin Dong, Sajal Choudhary, Seungwhan Moon, Xinyuan Zhang, Adithya Sagar, Surya Appini, Kaushik Patnaik 等

End-to-end speech-in, speech-out dialogue systems are emerging as a powerful alternative to traditional ASR–LLM–TTS pipelines but remain prone to hallucinations due to limited factual grounding. While text-based dialogue models have effectively mitigated this issue through tools such as web search APIs, extending such capabilities to speech-in, speech-out systems remains underexplored. A key challenge is that tool integration increases latency, disrupting conversational flow. To mitigate this, we propose Streaming Retrieval-Augmented Generation (Stream RAG), a novel framework that reduces latency by predicting tool queries in parallel with user speech, even before the user finishes speaking. Specifically, we develop a post-training pipeline that teaches the model when to issue tool calls and how to generate spoken summaries using retrieved text results, thereby improving both accuracy and responsiveness. To evaluate our approach, we construct AudioCRAG, a benchmark created by converting queries from the publicly available CRAG dataset into speech form. Experimental results show that Stream RAG improves QA accuracy by over 20.0% absolute on AudioCRAG and achieves state-of-the-art performance, including outperforming cascaded systems, on the SLUE-SQA benchmark, while reducing latency by up to 57%. Stream RAG is modality-agnostic and can be applied equally to typed input, paving the way for more agentic, real-time AI assistants.

Social Aspects · Accountability, Transparency, and Interpretability

Tiejin Chen, Longchao Da, Xiaoou Liu, Hua Wei

Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) is widely regarded as the primary safeguard for deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) in high-stakes domains. However, \textbf{we argue that the field suffers from a category error: prevailing UQ methods are just unsupervised clustering algorithms.} We demonstrate that most current approaches inherently quantify the internal consistency of the model's generations rather than their external correctness. Consequently, current methods are fundamentally blind to factual reality and fail to detect ``confident hallucinations,'' where models exhibit high confidence in stable but incorrect answers. Therefore, the current UQ methods may create a deceptive sense of safety when deploying the models with uncertainty. In detail, we identify three critical pathologies resulting from this dependence on internal state: a hyperparameter sensitivity crisis that renders deployment unsafe, an internal evaluation cycle that conflates stability with truth, and a fundamental lack of ground truth that forces reliance on unstable proxy metrics to evaluate uncertainty. To resolve this impasse, we advocate for a paradigm shift to UQ and outline a roadmap for the research community to adopt better evaluation metrics and settings, implement mechanism changes for native uncertainty, and anchor verification in objective truth, ensuring that model confidence serves as a reliable proxy for reality.

Deep Learning · Large Language Models

Tina Behnia, Puneesh Deora, Christos Thrampoulidis

Language models are pretrained on sequences that blend statistical regularities (structures making text fluent) with factual associations between specific tokens (corresponding to knowledge of facts). While recent work suggests that the variability of their interaction, such as paraphrases of factual associations, critically determines generalization ability, we lack a systematic analysis of these impacts. This paper introduces a flexible synthetic testbed that combines a statistical stream of generic tokens with an abstract factual stream of source-target token pairs, enabling fine-grained control over their interaction. Specifically, the design enables the independent control of diversity nature by manipulating stream composition (contextual structure) and the level of diversity by varying which statistical streams each fact appears in. Through controlled experiments, we find that while higher contextual diversity delays in-distribution (ID) factual accuracy, its effect on out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization depends critically on contextual structure. In some cases, OOD performance follows the same trend as ID, but in others, diversity becomes essential for non-trivial factual learning. Even when low diversity prohibits factual recall, optimal diversity levels depend on training duration. Beyond factual recall failures, we identify structures where statistical generalization fails independently, and others where both capabilities degrade simultaneously. This demonstrates how the interplay between contextual design and diversity level impacts different aspects of generalization. Furthermore, through a series of controlled interventions on the model components, we trace the generalization failures to distinct optimization bottlenecks, highlighting the importance of the learned embedding and unembedding layers. Overall, our synthetic framework allows us to isolate effects that would be confounded in large-scale studies, thus offering a controlled testbed for future investigations.

Deep Learning · Large Language Models

Kailin Jiang, Hongbo Jiang, Ning Jiang, Zhi Gao, Jinhe Bi, Yuchen Ren, Bin Li, Yuntao Du, Lei Liu, Qing Li

Large Multimodal Models encode extensive factual knowledge in their pre-trained weights. However, its knowledge remains static and limited, unable to keep pace with real-world developments, which hinders continuous knowledge acquisition. Effective knowledge injection thus becomes critical, involving two goals: knowledge adaptation (injecting new knowledge) and knowledge retention (preserving old knowledge). Existing methods often struggle to learn new knowledge and suffer from catastrophic forgetting. To address these challenges, we propose KORE, a synergistic method centered around KnOwledge-oRientEd controls. These controls are implemented through a two-stage optimization process: (1) KORE automatically converts individual knowledge items into structured and comprehensive knowledge to ensure that the model accurately learns new knowledge, enabling accurate adaptation. (2) KORE stores previous knowledge in the covariance matrix of LMM's linear layer activations and initializes the adapter by projecting the original weights into the matrix's null space, defining a fine-tuning direction that minimizes interference with previous knowledge, enabling powerful retention. Extensive experiments on various LMMs, including LLaVA-v1.5 (7B), LLaVA-v1.5 (13B), and Qwen2.5-VL (7B), show that KORE achieves superior new knowledge injection performance and effectively mitigates catastrophic forgetting.

Deep Learning · Large Language Models

Yufei Chen, Yao Wang, Haibin Zhang, Hualin zhou, Tao Gu

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems suffer from a fundamental functional misalignment where retrievers optimize for semantic relevance, often recalling documents with high background utility but factually erroneous answer spans that generators blindly adopt as cognitive shortcuts. To resolve this, we propose the collaborative Critic-Reasoner framework that shifts robustness control from coarse-grained filtering to fine-grained cognitive decoupling. We disentangle the generation process into two serialized roles by deploying a Critic to perform surgical evidence purification through identifying and masking misleading entities while preserving supportive background context, followed by a Reasoner that switches from rote extraction to deductive reasoning based on the residual evidence. We operationalize this framework via a two-stage alignment strategy combining supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with path-aware direct preference optimization (DPO) to enforce strict behavioral synergy. Experimental results on adversarial benchmarks such as ConFiQA demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms baselines, achieving a 25.99\% accuracy gain in conflicting scenarios and effectively resolving the trust bias dilemma in real-world RAG.

Applications · Computer Vision

Zhenhua Lei, Zefang Han, yu qiu

Scene graph generation (SGG) aims to parse an image into a structured graph of objects and their predicates, enabling explicit relational reasoning for visual understanding. However, prevailing methods often over-predict geometric predicates, resulting in scene graphs that are factually correct yet semantically shallow. While recent works effectively attribute this phenomenon to the long-tailed data distribution, we identify another critical factor driving such biased prediction: co-occurrence-induced representation entanglement, where geometric and non-geometric predicates that frequently co-occur are encoded into overly similar representations. To this end, we introduce Dual-stream Synergistic Network (DS-Net) that models geometric and non-geometric predicates with two specialized streams, coupled with a bidirectional cross-stream fusion mechanism. The space stream focuses on spatial and structural cues, while the vision stream captures fine-grained visual evidence and semantic priors. Extensive experiments show that DS-Net consistently improves predicate inference, achieving 1.3\% $\sim$ 6.1\% absolute gains in mR@100 on the SGGen task when integrated into existing SGG methods. These results highlight the importance of synergistic modeling of geometric and non-geometric predicates for generating semantically richer scene graphs.

Deep Learning · Graph Neural Networks

Sambaran Bandyopadhyay, Ananth Muppidi

Multi-hop Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs faces a critical challenge: traditional retrieve-then-read pipelines break differentiability, preventing the retriever from learning to bridge the semantic gap where intermediate nodes lack lexical overlap with the query. To address this, we propose RSF-GLLM, a framework decoupling differentiable graph reasoning from answer generation. Our Recurrent Soft-Flow (RSF) module employs a GRU-guided query updater to propagate continuous relevance scores, utilizing a dynamic gating mechanism to traverse semantically dissimilar bridge nodes via structural cues. We introduce flow sparsity regularization to theoretically guarantee convergence from soft probabilities to discrete reasoning paths. These paths are extracted and textualized to fine-tune a Large Language Model (LLM), ensuring generation is grounded in factual topology. Experiments on WebQSP and CWQ demonstrate that RSF-GLLM achieves competitive performance with superior inference efficiency compared to LLM based computationally expensive approaches.

Deep Learning · Large Language Models

Mengyang Li, Zhong Zhang, pinlong zhao

Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has become a predominant approach for aligning large language models with human preferences. Recent work has used perplexity differentials to identify unreliable preference labels, but these methods apply uniform calibration strategies across all samples. We observe that the reliability of perplexity signals varies substantially across task types: perplexity differentials strongly correlate with preference quality for factual tasks but provide weak signals for creative tasks where novelty is valued. Based on this observation, we propose Task-Aware Preference Calibration (TAPC), which learns task-conditioned calibration functions that adapt to the characteristics of different prompt types. TAPC employs a task encoder to extract prompt representations and learns task-specific slope and bias parameters for mapping perplexity signals to confidence targets. Through meta-learning on a small reference dataset, TAPC discovers how to weight perplexity signals appropriately for each task category. Experiments on Llama-3-8B and Qwen2-7B demonstrate that TAPC outperforms existing methods across multiple benchmarks, with particularly large improvements on creative and open-ended tasks where uniform calibration strategies fail.

Qiyao Wei, Samuel Holt, Jing Yang, Markus Wulfmeier, Mihaela van der Schaar

Peer review, the bedrock of scientific advancement in machine learning (ML), is strained by a crisis of scale. Exponential growth in manuscript submissions to premier ML venues such as NeurIPS, ICML, and ICLR is outpacing the finite capacity of qualified reviewers, leading to concerns about review quality, consistency, and reviewer fatigue. This position paper argues that AI-assisted peer review must become an urgent research and infrastructure priority. We advocate for a comprehensive AI-augmented ecosystem, leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) not as replacements for human judgment, but as sophisticated collaborators for authors, reviewers, and Area Chairs (ACs). We propose specific roles for AI in enhancing factual verification, guiding reviewer performance, assisting authors in quality improvement, and supporting ACs in decision-making. Crucially, we contend that the development of such systems hinges on access to more granular, structured, and ethically-sourced peer review process data. We outline a research agenda, including illustrative experiments, to develop and validate these AI assistants, and discuss significant technical and ethical challenges. We call upon the ML community to proactively build this AI-assisted future, ensuring the continued integrity and scalability of scientific validation, while maintaining high standards of peer review.

Social Aspects · Accountability, Transparency, and Interpretability

Qiyao Wei, Samuel Holt, Jing Yang, Markus Wulfmeier, Mihaela van der Schaar

Peer review, the bedrock of scientific advancement in machine learning (ML), is strained by a crisis of scale. Exponential growth in manuscript submissions to premier ML venues such as NeurIPS, ICML, and ICLR is outpacing the finite capacity of qualified reviewers, leading to concerns about review quality, consistency, and reviewer fatigue. This position paper argues that AI-assisted peer review must become an urgent research and infrastructure priority. We advocate for a comprehensive AI-augmented ecosystem, leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) not as replacements for human judgment, but as sophisticated collaborators for authors, reviewers, and Area Chairs (ACs). We propose specific roles for AI in enhancing factual verification, guiding reviewer performance, assisting authors in quality improvement, and supporting ACs in decision-making. Crucially, we contend that the development of such systems hinges on access to more granular, structured, and ethically-sourced peer review process data. We outline a research agenda, including illustrative experiments, to develop and validate these AI assistants, and discuss significant technical and ethical challenges. We call upon the ML community to proactively build this AI-assisted future, ensuring the continued integrity and scalability of scientific validation, while maintaining high standards of peer review.

Deep Learning · Large Language Models

Jiahao Yang, Shuhai Zhang, Hailong Kang, Feng Liu, Qi Chen, Mingkui Tan

Large language models (LLMs) often hallucinate by generating factually incorrect or unfaithful content, posing significant risks to their safe use. Detecting such hallucinations is particularly challenging under the zero-source constraint, where no model internals or external references are available, and detection must rely solely on the textual query–answer pair. In this paper, we propose Human-like Criteria Probing for Hallucination Detection (HCPD), a paradigm that emulates the multi-faceted reasoning of human evaluators. Its core is an Human-like Criteria Probing (HCP) mechanism, in which an LLM agent adaptively decomposes its judgment into a weighted set of interpretable criteria and aggregates criterion-specific scores into a final truthfulness measure. To achieve this adaptive capability, we introduce a reward-based alignment scheme using only weak supervision from semantic consistency. At inference, we employ a multi-sampling aggregation strategy to ensures robust decisions while preserving full interpretability. We further provide theoretical analysis supporting the reliability of our approach. Extensive experiments show that HCPD consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, offering an effective and explainable solution for zero-source hallucination detection.

Deep Learning · Large Language Models

Artem Vazhentsev, Lyudmila Rvanova, Gleb Kuzmin, Ekaterina Fadeeva, Ivan Lazichny, Alexander Panchenko, Maxim Panov, Mrinmaya Sachan, Preslav Nakov, Tim Baldwin 等

Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has led to systems capable of producing text with remarkable fluency. However, these models are still prone to factual inaccuracies, often referred to as \``hallucinations''. One strategy to alleviate this issue is uncertainty quantification (UQ), but most existing approaches are computationally intensive or require supervision. In this work, we propose Recurrent Attention-based Uncertainty Quantification (RAUQ), an unsupervised and efficient framework for identifying hallucinations. The method leverages an observation about transformer attention behavior: when incorrect information is generated, certain ``uncertainty-aware'' attention heads, tend to reduce their focus on preceding tokens. RAUQ automatically detects these attention heads and combines their activation patterns with token-level confidence measures in a recurrent scheme, producing a sequence-level uncertainty estimate in just a single forward pass. Through experiments on twelve tasks spanning question answering, summarization, and translation across four different LLMs, we show that RAUQ consistently outperforms state-of-the-art UQ baselines. Importantly, it does so with minimal cost, less than 1% additional computation. Since it requires neither labeled data nor extensive parameter tuning, RAUQ serves as a lightweight, plug-and-play solution for real-time hallucination detection in white-box LLMs.

Deep Learning · Foundation Models

Tianbo Wang, Yuqing Ma, Lingyan Meng, Zhange Zhang, Kewei Liao, Jian Yang, Simin Li, Jinyang Guo, Xianglong Liu

Medical Large Vision-Language Models (Med-LVLMs) suffer from severe hallucinations, posing critical safety risks in clinical deployment. Editing LVLM activations has shown promise for mitigating hallucination with minimal cost. However, due to the requirements of medical domain expertise, existing methods struggle to capture imaging manifestations and diagnostic principles that are critical for clinical interpretation, thereby limiting their effectiveness. To address these limitations, we propose the first MEDical-oriented Activation Editing (MEDA) method by integrating Query-decisive Manifestation Steering (QMS) and Principle-driven Diagnosis Induction (PDI) to promote Med-LVLM's expertise elicitation. Specifically, QMS retrieves positive query-decisive imaging manifestations as trusted guidance for activation steering, while PDI constructs positive principle-embedded diagnostic prompts to induce expert-like clinical reasoning. Extensive experiments across six benchmarks and six LVLMs demonstrate that MEDA efficiently improves the response factuality with up to a 10.2\% gain on IU-Xray, while exhibiting strong generalization and few-shot robustness.

Deep Learning · Large Language Models

Ye Mo, Chuan Zhou, Fengxiang Cheng, Jialin Yu, Fenrong Liu, Liangming Pan, Sheng Zhou, Haoxuan Li, Zhouchen Lin, Phil Torr

Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable performance across various natural language processing tasks but struggle with complex logical reasoning, particularly in real-world settings. Existing research is largely confined to the closed-world assumption, which posits that all premises required for reasoning are explicitly provided. However, real-world tasks frequently exhibit open-world characteristics, where the provided information is insufficient to infer a conclusion due to missing premises or implicit commonsense knowledge. To address this limitation, we propose OpenIKLR, an Open-world Incomplete-Knowledge-aware Logical Reasoning framework that integrates symbolic logic solvers with LLMs. OpenIKLR first translates natural language into symbolic representations to precisely pinpoint reasoning gaps via a logical solver. It then iteratively generate a minimal set of necessary missing premises using LLMs. To ensure these additional premises are both logically sound and factually accurate, we introduce a dual-verification process: logic verification via the solver and fact verification via the LLMs. Extensive experiments demonstrate that OpenIKLR consistently outperforms existing logical reasoning and RAG baselines across multiple backbones and real-world datasets, highlighting its efficacy in handling incomplete information. The code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/ICML26_22398-B5BF/.

Yujia Chen, Rui Sun, Wangkai Li, Huayu Mai, Bingzhou Wang, Zhangyu He, Aibing Li, Wenzhang SUN, Tianzhu Zhang

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) demonstrate impressive multimodal capabilities, yet suffer from hallucination—generating factually inaccurate content. Contrastive Decoding (CD) mitigates this by contrasting amateur and expert branches at the logit level. However, our investigation reveals that such logit-level interventions fundamentally compromise generation coherence, necessitating restrictive penalty constraints unrelated to hallucination suppression. We introduce Attention Contrastive Decoding (ACD), a training-free plug-in that complements logit-level CD by relocating part of the contrastive operations to the attention mechanism. Operating at an earlier stage of the forward pass, ACD performs smooth semantic-preserving interventions through an Adaptive Subtraction Strategy (ASS), which attenuates hallucination-associated attention patterns while amplifying critical visual information. Extensive experiments demonstrate that combining ACD with existing CD methods (e.g., VCD+ACD) produces substantially more coherent outputs with further reduced hallucinations, eliminating restrictive penalties while enabling trustworthy multimodal generation.

Deep Learning · Large Language Models

Gal Yona, Mor Geva, Yossi Matias

Despite significant improvements in factuality, confident errors continue to reappear as benchmarks probe more niche knowledge that models lack. We argue that most gains have come from expanding the model's knowledge boundary (encoding more facts) rather than improving awareness of that boundary (distinguishing known from unknown). We conjecture that this stems from the fact that the latter is inherently difficult: in the absence of strong ability to separate correct from incorrect answers (discrimination), fully eliminating hallucinations requires aggressive abstention, imposing a significant utility tax. Given this limitation, we propose complementing knowledge expansion with faithful uncertainty -- honestly conveying whatever uncertainty remains. This metacognitive capability becomes even more critical for tool-augmented models, where it serves as the control layer that determines when to search and how to weigh conflicting information. We conclude by highlighting the key challenges and open problems that must be tackled to make progress toward this objective.

Deep Learning · Large Language Models

Hippolyte Pilchen, Romain Fabre, Franck SIGNE TALLA, Patrick Perez, Edouard Grave

Large language models (LLMs) are typically trained on shuffled corpora, yielding models whose knowledge is frozen at training time and whose temporal grounding remains poorly understood. In this work, we study the impact of pretraining dynamics on the acquisition of time-sensitive factual knowledge, focusing specifically on data ordering. Our main contributions are twofold. First, we introduce a comprehensive benchmark of over 7,000 temporally grounded questions and an evaluation protocol that enables analysis of whether models correctly associate facts with their corresponding time periods. Second, we pretrain 6B-parameter language models on temporally ordered Common Crawl snapshots and compare them against standard shuffled pretraining. Our results show that sequentially trained models match shuffled baselines on general language understanding and common knowledge while consistently exhibiting more up-to-date and temporally precise knowledge. Temporally ordered pretraining yields improved factual freshness, while shuffled pretraining peaks on older data, possibly due to increased factual repetition. These findings, along with the release of our checkpoints and datasets, provide a foundation for future research on continual learning for large language models.