论文检索

Qiao Liang, Ying Shen, Yao Liu, Tiantian Chen, Lin Zhang

Multimodal Emotion–Cause Triplet Extraction in Conversations (MECTEC) is fundamental for fine-grained affect understanding, yet it remains challenging in multi-turn, multi-speaker settings. Existing methods often make locally plausible predictions but struggle to maintain conversation-level consistency under within-speaker emotion shifts and core events. To address this, we propose ECFlow, a unified framework that combines appraisal-guided structured generation with graph-structured reinforcement learning. ECFlow operationalizes cognitive appraisal theory into a controllable intermediate reasoning trace and constructs UMECS, a unified supervision dataset with cognitively grounded traces. It then lifts predicted and gold triplets into an Emotion–Cause Flow Graph and optimizes verifiable, structure-aware rewards for emotion-shift coherence and core-event consistency, together with task-oriented triplet rewards. Experiments on public MECTEC benchmarks show that ECFlow consistently outperforms strong baselines, achieving state-of-the-art triplet extraction and improved structure-aware metrics on emotion shifts and core events. Our code and dataset are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/ECFlow-E908.

Fengyuan Liu, Yi Huang, Sichun Luo, Yuqi Wang, Yazheng Yang, Xinye Li, Zefa Hu, Junlan Feng, Qi Liu

Discovering effective predictive signals, or “alphas,” from financial data with high dimensionality and extremely low signal-to-noise ratio remains a difficult open problem. Despite progress in deep learning, genetic programming, and, more recently, large language model (LLM)–based factor generation, existing approaches still explore only a narrow region of the vast alpha search space. Neural models tend to produce opaque and fragile patterns, while symbolic or formula-based methods often yield redundant or economically ungrounded expressions that generalize poorly. Although different in form, these paradigms share a key limitation: none can conduct broad, structured, and human-like exploration that balances logical consistency with creative leaps.To address this gap, we introduce the Cognitive Alpha Mining Framework (CogAlpha), which combines code-level alpha representation with LLM-driven reasoning and evolutionary search. Treating LLMs as adaptive cognitive agents, our framework iteratively refines, mutates, and recombines alpha candidates through multi-stage prompts and financial feedback. This synergistic design enables deeper thinking, richer structural diversity, and economically interpretable alpha discovery, while greatly expanding the effective search space.Experiments on 5 stock datasets from 3 stock markets demonstrate that CogAlpha consistently discovers alphas with superior predictive accuracy, robustness, and generalization over existing methods. Our results highlight the promise of aligning evolutionary optimization with LLM-based reasoning for automated and explainable alpha discovery.

Haoyue Liu, Zhichao Wang, Yongxin Guo, Haoran Shou, Xiaoying Tang

Automated prompt optimization is crucial for eliciting reliable reasoning from large language models (LLMs), yet most API-only prompt optimizers iteratively edit monolithic prompts, coupling components and obscuring credit assignment, limiting controllability, and wasting tokens. We propose Adaptive Prompt Structure Factorization (aPSF), an API-only framework (prompt-in/text-out; no access to model internals) that uses an Architect model to discover task-specific prompt structures as semantic factors. aPSF then performs interventional, single-factor updates: interventional factor-level scoring estimates each factor’s marginal contribution via validation-performance changes, and error-guided factor selection routes updates to the current dominant failure source for more sample-efficient optimization. Across multiple advanced reasoning benchmarks, aPSF outperforms strong baselines, improving accuracy by up to +4.29 percentage points on average, and reduces optimization cost by 45–87% tokens on MultiArith while reaching peak validation in 1 step.

Jingwei Ni, Ekaterina Fadeeva, Tianyi Wu, Mubashara Akhtar, Jiaheng Zhang, Elliott Ash, Markus Leippold, Timothy Baldwin, See-Kiong Ng, Artem Shelmanov 等

LLMs can solve complex tasks by generating long, multi-step reasoning chains. Test-time scaling (TTS) can further improve LLM performance by sampling multiple variants of intermediate reasoning steps, verifying their correctness, and strategically choosing the best steps for continuation. However, existing verification approaches, such as Process Reward Models (PRMs), are computationally expensive, limited to specific domains, and require large-scale human or model-generated annotations. We propose a lightweight alternative for step-level reasoning verification based on probing the internal states of LLMs. We train a transformer-based probe that uses the internal states of the frozen LLM to estimate the credibility of its reasoning steps during generation. Annotation can be generated either by another larger LLM (e.g., DeepSeek-R1) or in a self-supervised manner by the original model itself. The probes are both effective and lightweight, containing fewer than 10M parameters. Across multiple domains, including mathematics, planning, and general knowledge question answering, our probes match or even exceed the performance of PRMs that are up to 810× larger. Our findings suggest that the internal states of LLMs encode their confidence in reasoning processes and can serve as reliable signals for reasoning step verification, offering a promising direction towards scalable and generalizable TTS and introspective LLMs.

Chenxu Liu, Yingjie Fu, Wei Yang, Ying Zhang, Tao Xie

Web applications (web apps) have become a key arena for large language models (LLMs) to demonstrate their code generation capabilities and commercial potential. However, building a benchmark for LLM-generated web apps remains challenging due to the need for real-world user requirements, generalizable evaluation metrics without relying on ground-truth implementations or test cases, and interpretable evaluation results. To address these challenges, we introduce WebCoderBench, the first real-world-collected, generalizable, and interpretable benchmark for web app generation. WebCoderBench comprises 1,572 user requirements, covering diverse modalities and expression styles that reflect realistic user intentions. WebCoderBench provides 24 fine-grained evaluation metrics across 9 perspectives, combining the rule-based and LLM-as-a-judge paradigms for fully automated, objective, and general evaluation. Moreover, WebCoderBench adopts human-preference-aligned weights over metrics to yield interpretable overall scores. Experiments across 12 representative LLMs and 2 LLM-based agents show that there exists no dominant model across all evaluation metrics, offering an opportunity for LLM developers to optimize their models in a targeted manner for a more powerful version.

Xiucheng Xu, Bingbing Xu, Tian Xueyun, Zihe Huang, Rongxin Chen, Li Yunfan, Huawei Shen

External memory systems are pivotal for enabling Large Language Model (LLM) agents to maintain persistent knowledge and perform long-horizon decision-making. Existing paradigms typically follow a two-stage process: computationally expensive memory construction (e.g., structuring data into graphs) followed by naive retrieval-augmented generation. However, our empirical analysis reveals two fundamental limitations: complex construction incurs high costs with marginal performance gains, and simple context concatenation fails to bridge the gap between retrieval recall and reasoning accuracy. To address above challenges, we propose **CoM (Chain-of-Memory)**, a novel framework that advocates for a paradigm shift toward lightweight construction paired with sophisticated utilization. CoM introduces a *Chain-of-Memory* mechanism that organizes retrieved fragments into coherent inference paths through dynamic evolution, utilizing adaptive truncation to prune irrelevant noise. Extensive experiments on the LongMemEval and LoCoMo benchmarks demonstrate that CoM outperforms strong baselines with accuracy gains of 7.5%–10.4%, while drastically reducing computational overhead to approximately 2.7% of token consumption and 6.0% of latency compared to complex memory architectures.

Niu Lian, Yuting Wang, Hanshu Yao, Jinpeng Wang, Bin Chen, Yaowei Wang, Min Zhang, Shu-Tao Xia

While multimodal large language models have demonstrated impressive short-term reasoning, they struggle with long-horizon video understanding due to limited context windows and static memory mechanisms that fail to mirror human cognitive efficiency. Existing paradigms typically fall into two extremes: vision-centric methods that incur high latency and redundancy through dense visual accumulation, or text-centric approaches that suffer from detail loss and hallucination via aggressive captioning. To bridge this gap, we propose **MM-Mem**, a pyramidal multimodal memory architecture grounded in *Fuzzy-Trace Theory*. **MM-Mem** structures memory hierarchically into a *Sensory Buffer*, *Episodic Stream*, and *Symbolic Schema*, enabling the progressive distillation of fine-grained perceptual traces (*verbatim*) into high-level semantic schemas (*gist*).Furthermore, to govern the dynamic construction of memory, we derive a Semantic Information Bottleneck objective and introduce SIB-GRPO to optimize the trade-off between memory compression and task-relevant information retention.In inference, we design an entropy-driven top-down memory retrieval strategy.Extensive experiments across 4 benchmarks confirm that **MM-Mem** achieves state-of-the-art performance on both offline and streaming tasks, demonstrating robust generalization and validating the effectiveness of cognition-inspired memory organization.Code and associated configurations are publicly available at ‘https://github.com/EliSpectre/MM-Mem‘.

Eva Vanmassenhove

Multilingual Large Language Models considerably changed how technologies influence language. While previous technologies could mediate or assist humans, there is now a tendency to offload the task of writing itself to these technologies, enabling models to change our languages more directly. While they provide us quick access to information and impressively fluent output, beneath their (apparent) sophistication lies a subtle, insidious threat: the gradual decline and loss of linguistic diversity. In this position paper, I explore how model collapse, with a particular focus on translation technology, can lead to the loss of linguistic forms, grammatical features, and cultural nuance. Model collapse refers to the consequences of self-consuming training loops, where automatically generated data (re-)enters the training data, leading to a gradual distortion of the data distribution and the underrepresentation of low-probability linguistic phenomena. Drawing on recent work in Computer Vision, Natural Language Processing and Machine Translation, I argue that the many tails of our linguistic distributions might be vanishing, and with them, the narratives and identities they carry. This paper is a call to resist linguistic flattening and to reimagine Natural Language Processing as a field that encourages, values and protects expressive multilingual diversity and creativity.

Chonghua Liao, Ke Wang, Yuchuan Wu, Ruoran Li, Fei Huang, Yongbin Li

Role-playing agents (RPAs) require balancing multiple objectives, such as instruction following, persona consistency, and stylistic fidelity, which are not always perfectly aligned across different dimensions. While prior work has primarily relied on supervised fine-tuning or reinforcement learning with scalarized rewards, these approaches do not explicitly address the coordination of multiple reward dimensions during optimization. We present **MOA** (**M**ulti-**O**bjective **A**lignment), a reinforcement-learning framework that enables multi-dimensional, fine-grained rubric optimization for general RPAs. MOA introduces a novel multi-objective optimization strategy that trains simultaneously on multiple fine-grained rubrics to boost optimization performance. Besides, to address the issues of model output diversity and quality, we have also employed thought-augmented rollout with off-policy guidance. Experiments on PersonaGym and RoleMRC show that MOA consistently improves multi-dimensional role-playing performance over supervised and standard RL baselines. Under identical evaluation protocols, an 8B model trained with MOA reaches performance competitive with strong closed-source models across multiple evaluation dimensions. These results suggest that MOA provides a practical framework for training more capable general-purpose role-playing agents.

Ruizi Han, Miao Zhang, Ziyue Qiao, Liqiang Nie

Efficient long-context inference remains a major challenge for large language models (LLMs), as the cost of attention computation during auto-regressive decoding grows linearly with the context length. Recent sparse attention methods attempt to reduce the computational burden by selecting a subset of tokens at each step, while most rely on static importance scores that are repeatedly computed over the entire cache, overlooking the relational dynamics of the decoding process. In this work, we revisit sparse attention in LLMs and propose to model token importance as a dynamic process that evolves over decoding steps and propagates through model layers. To efficiently measure token importance, we propose two lightweight mechanisms: (1) Cross-Step Accumulation, which incrementally maintains long-term, query-agnostic importance via decayed accumulation of sparse attention scores, avoiding recomputing the importance of decoded tokens; and (2) Cross-Layer Propagation, which leverages the model’s intrinsic Retrieval Heads to compute query-aware indices and efficiently propagate them across layers; Together, these mechanisms preserve both stable context memory and adaptive query relevance while reduce redundant computation. We evaluate our approach on PG-19, RULER, LongBench, and mathematical reasoning benchmarks using models employing Multi-Head and Grouped-Query Attention. Under varying KV cache budgets, our method consistently outperforms prior sparse attention baselines, approaches full attention performance in most settings, and achieves speedups of up to 5.36\times for attention latency and 2.33\times for end-to-end decoding. Our code is available at: https://github.com/iLearn-Lab/ACL26-EvoSparse.

Sihang Zhao, Kangrui Yu, Youliang Yuan, Pinjia He, Hongyi Wen

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely explored in educational scenarios. We identify a critical vulnerability in current educational LLMs, pedagogical jailbreaks, where students use answer-inducing prompts to elicit solutions rather than scaffolded instructions. To enable systematic study, we unify and formalize safe, helpful, and pedagogical behaviors with a knowledge-mastery graph and introduce SHAPE, a benchmark of 9,087 student-question pairs for evaluating tutoring behavior under adversarial pressure. We propose a graph-augmented tutoring pipeline that infers prerequisite concepts from queries, identifies mastery gaps, and routes generation between instructing and problem-solving via explicit gating. Experiments across multiple LLMs show that our method yields significantly improved safety under two pedagogical jailbreak settings, while maintaining near-ceiling helpfulness under the same evaluation protocol. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/MAPS-research/SHaPE

Kaitong Cai, Jusheng Zhang, Keze Wang

Hybrid offline–online reinforcement learning (O2O RL) promises both sample efficiency and robust exploration, but suffers from instability due to distribution shift between offline and online data. We introduce RLPD-GX, a framework that decouples policy optimization from safety enforcement: a reward-seeking learner explores freely, while a projection-based guardian guarantees rule-consistent execution and safe value backups. This design preserves the exploratory value of online interactions without collapsing to conservative policies. To further stabilize training, we propose dynamic curricula that gradually extend temporal horizons and anneal offline–online data mixing. We prove convergence via a contraction property of the guarded Bellman operator, and empirically show state-of-the-art performance on Atari-100k, achieving a normalized mean score of 3.02 (+45% over prior hybrid methods) with stronger safety and stability. Beyond Atari, ablations demonstrate consistent gains across safety-critical and long-horizon tasks, underscoring the generality of our design. Extensive and comprehensive results highlight decoupled safety enforcement as a simple yet principled route to robust O2O RL, suggesting a broader paradigm for reconciling exploration and safety in reinforcement learning.

Xiaoao Zhu, Jie Ren, Zhiqiang Li, Jie Zheng, Zhanyong Tang, Zheng Wang

Lifting stripped and highly optimized binaries to the canonical compiler intermediate representation (IR) enables program analysis when source code is unavailable. However, compiler optimizations severely distort control-flow and data-flow structure, making existing rule-based and LLM-based decompilation approaches brittle. We present BRIDGE, a system that reliably lifts optimized binaries to analysis-friendly compiler IR. BRIDGE combines control-flow-aware retrieval-augmented generation with feedback-driven verification. It uses pseudo-probe instrumentation to align optimized binary fragments with normalized IR semantics, and then employs an iterative refinement loop guided by static analysis and runtime feedback to improve executability and semantic consistency. We evaluate BRIDGE on HumanEval-Decompile and MBPP, lifting x86-64 and ARM64 binaries to LLVM IR. BRIDGE outperforms seven baselines, achieving an average of over 30% higher re-executability than the strongest general-purpose LLM baseline.

Ahmed Ewais, Ahmed Hashish, Amr Ali

Large language models encode extensive world knowledge valuable for zero-shot named entity recognition. However, their causal attention mechanism, where tokens attend only to preceding context, prevents effective token classification when disambiguation requires future context. Existing approaches use LLMs generatively, prompting them to list entities or produce structured outputs, but suffer from slow autoregressive decoding, hallucinated entities, and formatting errors. We propose Just Pass Twice (JPT), a simple yet effective method that enables causal LLMs to perform discriminative token classification with full bidirectional context. Our key insight is that concatenating the input to itself lets each token in the second pass attend to the complete sentence, requiring no architectural modifications. We combine these representations with definition-guided entity embeddings for flexible zero-shot generalization. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art results on zero-shot NER benchmarks, surpassing the previous best method by +7.9 F1 on average across CrossNER and MIT benchmarks, being over 20× faster than comparable generative methods.

Yuexiao Liu, Lijun Li, Xingjun Wang, Jing Shao

Recent advancements in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) have gained significant attention due to their objective and verifiable reward signals, demonstrating strong performance in reasoning and code generation tasks. However, the potential safety risks associated with RLVR remain underexplored. This paper presents HarmRLVR, the first systematic investigation into the alignment reversibility risk of RLVR. We show that safety alignment can be rapidly reversed using GRPO with merely 64 harmful prompts without responses, causing models to readily comply with harmful instructions. Across five models from Llama, Qwen, and DeepSeek, we empirically demonstrate that RLVR-based attacks elevate the average harmfulness score to 4.94 with an attack success rate of 96.01%, significantly outperforming harmful fine-tuning while preserving general capabilities. Our findings reveal that RLVR can be efficiently exploited for harmful alignment, posing serious threats to open-source model safety.

Fengqi Zhu, Rongzhen Wang, Shen Nie, Xiaolu Zhang, Chunwei Wu, Jun Zhou, Yankai Lin, Ji-Rong Wen, Chongxuan Li

Masked diffusion language models present a promising paradigm for language modeling, yet the systematic theoretical analysis and comprehensive empirical validation of their alignment on general tasks remain relatively underexplored. In this paper, we identify the primary challenge for this problem: the high variance in Evidence Lower Bound (ELBO)-based likelihood estimates required for preference optimization. To address this issue, we propose *Variance-Reduced Preference Optimization* (VRPO), a framework that formally analyzes the bias and variance of the preference optimization loss and gradient based on Direct Preference Optimization, showing both are governed by a score-estimator variance. Building on this foundation, we introduce multiple unbiased variance reduction strategies, including optimal budget allocation and antithetic sampling, to improve alignment performance. We demonstrate the effectiveness of VRPO by applying it to LLaDA, a large diffusion language model. The resulting model, LLaDA 1.5, consistently outperforms its SFT-only predecessor consistently across various general benchmarks, such as mathematics (GSM8K +4.7), coding (HumanEval +3.0, MBPP +1.8), and alignment (IFEval +4.0, Arena-Hard +4.3). Furthermore, LLaDA 1.5 demonstrates a highly competitive mathematical performance compared to other strong language MDMs and ARMs. Our model is available at https://huggingface.co/GSAI-ML/LLaDA-1.5.

Akira Kawabata, Saku Sugawara

Rubric-augmented verification guides reward models with explicit evaluation criteria, yielding more reliable judgments than single-model verification.However, most existing methods require costly rubric annotations, limiting scalability.Moreover, we find that rubric generation is vulnerable to a failure of cooperation; low-quality rubrics actively mislead reward models rather than help. Inspired by the principle of cooperative communication, we propose Cooperative yet Critical reward modeling (C2), a framework that significantly improves reward model judgments by having the reward model critically collaborate with a rubric generator trained solely from binary preferences.In C2, we synthesize helpful and misleading rubric pairs by measuring how each rubric shifts the reward model toward or away from the correct preference. Using these contrastive pairs, we train a cooperative rubric generator to propose helpful rubrics, and a critical verifier to assess rubric validity before making its judgment, following only rubrics it deems helpful at inference time. C2 outperforms reasoning reward models trained on the same binary preferences, with gains of up to 6.5 points on RM-Bench and 6.0 points length-controlled win rate on AlpacaEval 2.0. Without external rubric annotations, C2 enables an 8B reward model to match performance achieved with rubrics from a 4\times larger model.Overall, our work demonstrates that eliciting deliberate cooperation in rubric-augmented verification makes reward models more trustworthy in a scalable way.

Lichao Wang, ZhaoXing Ren, Tianzhuo Yang, Jiaming Ji, Chi Harold Liu, Yaodong Yang, Juntao Dai

As Large Language Model (LLM) agents increasingly leverage the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to operate in complex environments, the expansion of their action spaces offers agents unsafe capabilities and underscores the risk of power-seeking. While broad action space and greater environment influence are essential for task fulfillment, they creates a fragile risk surface where minor errors or hallucinations are magnified into catastrophic failures. In response, we propose SafeMCP, a server-side defense plugin that constrains tool acquisition via predictive reasoning regarding future safety risks. SafeMCP utilizes an internal world model for look-ahead reasoning to implement a two-tier defense: proactive tool filtering to constrain hazardous power expansion and immediate intervention as a fail-safe. To train SafeMCP, we introduce a three-stage pipeline comprising environmental dynamic grounding, safe policy initialization, and reinforcement learning (RL) with dual verifiable rewards. Experiments on PowerSeeking Bench, ToolEmu, and AgentHarm show that SafeMCP achieves a safe equilibrium, effectively mitigating risks while preserving agent utility.

Adam Štorek, Mukur Gupta, Noopur Bhatt, Aditya Gupta, Janie Kim, Prashast Srivastava, Suman Jana

AI coding assistants automatically gather context from potentially untrusted sources to generate code recommendations. We introduce Cross-Origin Context Poisoning (XOXO), a novel attack that exploits this automatic context inclusion by subtly manipulating code without changing its semantics. Attackers introduce semantics-preserving transformations (e.g., renamed variables) to shared code, causing AI assistants to unknowingly recommend vulnerable code patterns to victims. To systematically identify effective transformations, we present Greedy Cayley Graph Search (GCGS), a black-box algorithm that efficiently composes transformations to identify adversarial inputs. Our evaluation demonstrates XOXO’s effectiveness at making LLMs generate buggy and vulnerable code, achieving average attack success rates of 73.20% against eight state-of-the-art models including GPT 4.1 and Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2, with vulnerability injection rates up to 66.67%. We also demonstrate a real-world attack against GitHub Copilot, highlighting critical security gaps in current AI coding tools.

Weihao Xuan, Qingcheng Zeng, Heli Qi, Yunze Xiao, Junjue Wang, Naoto Yokoya

Autonomous agents based on large language models (LLMs) are rapidly evolving to handle multi-turn tasks, but ensuring their trustworthiness remains a critical challenge. A fundamental pillar of this trustworthiness is calibration, which refers to an agent’s ability to express confidence that reliably reflects its actual performance. While calibration is well-established for static models, its dynamics in tool-integrated agentic workflows remain under-explored. In this work, we systematically investigate verbalized calibration in tool-use agents, revealing a fundamental confidence dichotomy driven by tool type. Specifically, our pilot study identifies that evidence tools (e.g., web search) systematically induce severe overconfidence due to inherent noise in retrieved information, while verification tools (e.g., code interpreters) can ground reasoning through deterministic feedback and mitigate miscalibration. To robustly improve calibration across tool types, we propose a reinforcement learning (RL) fine-tuning framework that jointly optimizes task accuracy and calibration, supported by a holistic benchmark of reward designs. We demonstrate that our trained agents not only achieve superior calibration but also exhibit robust generalization from local training environments to noisy web settings and to distinct domains such as mathematical reasoning. Our results highlight the necessity of domain-specific calibration strategies for tool-use agents. More broadly, this work establishes a foundation for building self-aware agents that can reliably communicate uncertainty in high-stakes, real-world deployments.