论文检索

Zhensheng Wang, ZhanTeng Lin, Wenmian Yang, Kun Zhou, Yiquan Zhang, Weijia Jia

The advancement of large language models (LLMs) has enhanced tabular question answering (Tabular QA), yet they struggle with open-domain queries exhibiting underspecified or uncertain expressions. To address this, we introduce the ODUTQA-MDC task and the first comprehensive benchmark to tackle it. This benchmark includes: (1) a large-scale ODUTQA dataset with 209 tables and 25,105 QA pairs; (2) a fine-grained labeling scheme for detailed evaluation; and (3) a dynamic clarification interface that simulates user feedback for interactive assessment. We also propose MAIC-TQA, a multi-agent framework that excels at detecting ambiguities, clarifying them through dialogue, and refining answers. Experiments validate our benchmark and framework, establishing them as a key resource for advancing conversational, underspecification-aware Tabular QA research.

Stefan Krsteski, Giuseppe Russo, Serina Chang, Robert West, Kristina Gligorić

Surveys provide valuable insights into public opinion and behavior, but their execution is costly and slow. Large language models (LLMs) have been proposed as a scalable, low-cost substitute for human respondents, but their outputs are often biased and yield invalid estimates. We study the interplay between synthesis methods that use LLMs to generate survey responses and rectification methods that debias population estimates, and explore how human responses are best allocated between them. Using two panel surveys with questions on nutrition, politics, and economics, we find that synthesis alone introduces substantial bias (24–86%), whereas combining it with rectification reduces bias below 5% and increases effective sample size by up to 14%. Overall, we challenge the common practice of using all human responses for fine-tuning, showing that under a fixed budget, allocating most to rectification results in far more effective estimation.

Lorenzo Molfetta, Alessio Cocchieri, Luca Ragazzi, Ilaria Bartolini, Marco Patella, Gianluca Moro

In medicine, claims remain valid when supported by empirical evidence grounded in stable biological reality. In law, by contrast, truth is contingent, defined by jurisdiction, temporal validity, and the hierarchy of authoritative sources. The recent success of large language models (LLMs) on medical licensing examinations has encouraged an expectation of comparable legal competence. This analogy, however, obscures a critical distinction between domains. Unlike in medicine, legal performance often depends less on inference than on determining when external authority is applicable, valid, and non-contradictory. We introduce a comparative diagnostic framework evaluating legal reasoning against medical baselines along four axes (knowledge recall, grounding, confidence, and robustness), uncovering a sharp domain asymmetry when applied to a new benchmark that encodes temporal validity and normative relationships. While medical LLMs reliably benefit from verified sources, legal LLMs struggle to assess when retrieved citations are useful or misleading, exhibiting overconfidence in perturbed contexts and sensitivity to superficial formatting cues. Increased model scale amplifies this tendency, revealing that stronger instruction following can coincide with weaker resistance to authoritative perturbations. These findings show that LLMs treat law as unstructured text rather than binding precedent, while revealing a tendency to over-trust authoritative but false information when external references conflict with a model’s internal knowledge.

Zhen Yang, Ping Jian, Zhongbin Guo, Zuming Zhang, Chengzhi Li, Yonghong Deng, Xinyue Zhang, Wenpeng Lu

Over the past year, spatial intelligence has drawn increasing attention. Many prior works study it from the perspective of visual-spatial intelligence, where models have access to visuospatial information from visual inputs. However, in the absence of visual information, whether linguistic intelligence alone is sufficient to endow models with spatial intelligence, and how models perform relevant tasks with text-only inputs still remain unexplored. Therefore, in this paper, we focus on a fundamental and critical capability in spatial intelligence from a linguistic perspective: viewpoint rotation understanding (VRU). Specifically, LLMs and VLMs are asked to infer their final viewpoint and predict the corresponding observation in an environment given textual description of viewpoint rotation and observation over multiple steps. We find that both LLMs and VLMs perform poorly on our proposed dataset while human can easily achieve 100% accuracy, indicating a substantial gap between current model capabilities and the requirements of spatial intelligence. To uncover the underlying mechanisms, we conduct a layer-wise probing analysis and head-wise causal intervention. Our findings reveal that although models encode viewpoint information in the hidden states, they appear to struggle to bind the viewpoint position with corresponding observation, resulting in a hallucination in final layers. Finally, we selectively fine-tune the key attention heads identified by causal intervention to improve VRU performance. Experimental results demonstrate that such selective fine-tuning achieves improved VRU performance while avoiding catastrophic forgetting of generic abilities.

Vu Tuan Truong, Long Bao Le

Large Language Models (LLMs), despite its impressive capabilities across domains, have been shown to be vulnerable to backdoor attacks. Prior backdoor strategies predominantly operate at the token level, where an injected trigger causes the model to generate a specific target word, choice, or class (depending on the task). Recent advances, however, exploit the long-form reasoning tendencies of modern LLMs to conduct reasoning-level backdoors: once triggered, the victim model inserts one or more malicious reasoning steps into its chain-of-thought (CoT). These attacks are substantially harder to detect, as the backdoored answer remains plausible and consistent with the poisoned reasoning trajectory. Yet, defenses tailored to this type of backdoor remain largely unexplored. To bridge this gap, we propose Critical-CoT, a novel defense mechanism that conducts a two-stage fine-tuning (FT) on LLMs to develop critical thinking behaviors, enabling them to automatically identify potential backdoors and refuse to generate malicious reasoning steps. Extensive experiments across multiple LLMs and datasets demonstrate that Critical-CoT provides strong robustness against both in-context learning-based and FT-based backdoor attacks. Notably, Critical-CoT exhibits strong cross-domain and cross-task generalization. Our code is available at hthttps://github.com/tuanvu171/Critical-CoT.

Chaoyin She, Ruifang Lu, Lida Chen, Wei Wang, Qinghua Huang

Ultrasound is the preferred early cancer screening modality due to non-ionizing radiation, cost-effectiveness, and real-time imaging, yet conventional diagnosis relies heavily on physician expertise, causing significant subjectivity and limited efficiency. Vision-Language Models (VLMs) show promise but lack ultrasound-specific knowledge and multi-organ generalization. We propose EchoVLM, the first open-source 10-billion-parameter ultrasound-tailored VLM with a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture. It is infused with knowledge across seven anatomical systems, trained on 208,941 clinical cases, 1.47 million ultrasound key-frame images, and over 100 diseases or imaging findings. Supporting clinical report generation, diagnosis prediction, and Visual Question Answering (VQA), it outperforms Qwen2-VL by 7.58 BLEU-1 and 3.45 ROUGE-1 points in report generation. This work shows substantial potential for establishing a general-purpose ultrasound VLM and lays a technical foundation for clinical translation. Source code and model weights are available at https://github.com/Asunatan/EchoVLM.

Congren Dai, Yue Yang, Krinos Li, Huichi Zhou, Shijie Liang, Bo Zhang, Enyang Liu, Ge Jin, Hongran An, Haosen Zhang 等

Understanding complete musical scores entails integrated reasoning over pitch, rhythm, harmony, and large-scale structure, yet the ability of Large Language Models and Vision–Language Models to interpret full musical notation remains insufficiently examined.We introduce Musical Score Understanding Benchmark (MSU-Bench), a human-curated benchmark for score-level musical understanding across textual (ABC notation) and visual (PDF) modalities. MSU-Bench contains 1,800 generative question–answer pairs from works by Bach, Beethoven, Chopin, Debussy, and others, organised into four levels of increasing difficulty, ranging from onset information to texture and form. Evaluations of more than fifteen state-of-the-art models, in both zero-shot and fine-tuned settings, reveal pronounced modality gaps, unstable level-wise performance, and challenges in maintaining multilevel correctness. Fine-tuning substantially improves results across modalities while preserving general knowledge, positioning MSU-Bench as a robust foundation for future research in multimodal reasoning. The benchmark and code are available at https://github.com/Congren-Dai/MSU-Bench.

Yuechen Jiang, Zhiwei Liu, Yupeng Cao, Yueru He, Ziyang Xu, Chen Xu, Zhiyang Deng, Prayag Tiwari, Xi Chen, Alejandro Lopez-Lira 等

We introduce RFC-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating large language models on financial misinformation under realistic news. RFC-Bench operates at the paragraph level and captures the contextual complexity of financial news where meaning emerges from dispersed cues. The benchmark defines two complementary tasks: reference-free misinformation detection and comparison-based diagnosis using paired original–perturbed inputs. Experiments reveal a consistent pattern: performance is substantially stronger when comparative context is available, while reference-free settings expose significant weaknesses, including unstable predictions and elevated invalid outputs. These results indicate that current models struggle to maintain coherent belief states without external grounding. By highlighting this gap, RFC-Bench provides a structured testbed for studying reference-free reasoning and advancing more reliable financial misinformation detection in real-world settings.

Ziyang Wang, Jiangfeng Xiao, Chuan Xiao, Ruoxiang LI, Rui Mao, Jianbin Qin

Large language models (LLMs) are expensive to serve because dense FFN blocks, multi-head attention, and KV caches dominate memory, making structured pruning a natural way to reduce serving costs under tight parameter and memory budgets. We present GRASPrune, a global budgeted structured pruning framework applied post-hoc to a pretrained model that jointly prunes FFN channels and attention KV head groups under a single global parameter budget. GRASPrune attaches lightweight learnable gates to prunable units and optimizes only these gates on a small unlabeled language-modeling calibration set, keeping all backbone weights frozen while enforcing the target sparsity at every step. A final budget-preserving scaling calibration reweights the surviving channels and heads to correct scale shifts introduced by pruning. On LLaMA-2-7B, GRASPrune removes 50% of parameters and achieves 12.18 perplexity on WikiText-2 while maintaining competitive average zero-shot accuracy on five downstream benchmarks, using a short calibration run of four epochs on 512 unlabeled sequences on a single NVIDIA A100 80GB GPU, all without any full-model fine-tuning.

Qishun Yang, Shu Yang, Lijie Hu, Di Wang

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) face safety misalignment where visual inputs enable harmful outputs. Existing methods require explicit safety labels or contrastive data, yet threat-related concepts are concrete and visually depictable, while safety concepts like helpfulness are abstract and lack visual referents. Inspired by self-fulfilling mechanism underlying emergent misalignment, we propose Visual Self-Fulfilling Alignment (VSFA). VSFA fine-tunes vision-language models (VLMs) on neutral VQA tasks constructed around threat-related images, without any safety labels. Through repeated exposure to threat-related visual content, models internalize implicit semantics of vigilance and caution, shaping safety-oriented personas. Experiments across multiple VLMs and safety benchmarks demonstrate that VSFA reduces attack success rate, improves response quality, and mitigates over-refusal while preserving general capabilities. Our work extends self-fulfilling mechanism from text to visual modalities, offering a label-free approach to VLMs alignment.

Yongxue Shan, Jie Peng, Zixuan Dong, Fei Hu, Xiaodong Wang

Large language models (LLMs) have recently advanced knowledge graph question answering (KGQA), but current methods tend to rely on LLM-induced type systems with inconsistent granularity, or perform multi-hop reasoning without explicit target-type constraints. We introduce OntGQA, a type-constrained KGQA framework that reasons over a relation-centric ontology graph, where each relation is labeled with its head and tail entity types to provide a stable schema backbone. Built on this graph, OntGQA adopts a planner–judge architecture with generative backoff: a type planner proposes plausible head–tail type pairs, a judge verifies retrieved candidates and their paths, and a generator is invoked only when all candidates are rejected. By constraining both endpoints of reasoning in type space, OntGQA achieves state-of-the-art performance and produces ontology-grounded reasoning chains, with substantial Hit@1 gains (87.7%→91.5% on WebQSP and 67.6%→74.6% on CWQ).

Refael Shaked Greenfeld, Reut Tsarfaty

Coreference Resolution (CR) is a fundamental NLP task critical for long-form tasks as information extraction, summarization, and many business applications. However, CR methods originally designed for English struggle with Morphologically Rich Languages (MRLs), where mention boundaries do not necessarily align with word boundaries, and a single token may consist of multiple anaphors. CR modeling and evaluation protocols standardly assume that, as in English, words and mentions mostly align. However, this assumption breaks down in MRLs, particularly in the context of LLMs’ raw-text processing and end-to-end tasks. To assess and address this challenge, we introduce KibutzR, the first comprehensive CR dataset for Modern Hebrew, an MRL rich with complex words and pronominal clitics. We deliver an annotated dataset that identifies mentions at word, sub-word and multi-word levels, and propose an evaluation protocol that directly addresses word/morpheme boundary discrepancies. Our experiments show that contemporary LLMs perform significantly worse on Hebrew than on English, and that performance degrades on raw unsegmented text. Crucially, we show an inverse performance-trend in Hebrew relative to English, where smaller encoders perform far better than contemporary decoder models, leaving ample space for investigation and improvement. We deliver a new benchmark for Hebrew coreference resolution and a segmentation-aware evaluation protocol to inform future work on other MRLs.

Haiduo Huang, Fuwei Yang, Zhenhua Liu, Pengju Ren

Speculative decoding has emerged as a promising technique to accelerate large language model inference by employing a smaller draft model to predict multiple tokens, which are then verified in parallel by the larger target model. However, existing approaches face a fundamental limitation: candidates at the same tree layer share identical feature representations, constraining diversity and diminishing overall effectiveness. We identify this as an intra-layer coupling problem that limits prediction accuracy. To address this challenge, we propose Jakiro, which introduces decoupled Mixture of Experts (MoE) into the draft model, enabling different experts to generate diverse candidate tokens from distinct feature spaces. We further propose Contrastive-Enhanced Parallel Decoding (CEPD) that combines autoregressive and parallel decoding with a contrastive mechanism to reduce inference steps while maintaining accuracy. Extensive experiments across diverse models and tasks demonstrate that Jakiro achieves significant speedups over strong baselines, with particularly notable improvements in non-greedy decoding scenarios where token diversity is crucial.

Junyou Su, He Zhu, Xiao Luo, Liyu Zhang, Hong-Yu Zhou, Yun Chen, Peng Li, Yang Liu, Guanhua Chen

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is fundamental to adapting large language models, yet training on complete datasets incurs prohibitive costs with diminishing returns. Existing data selection methods suffer from severe domain specificity: techniques optimized for general instruction-following fail on reasoning tasks, and vice versa. We observe that measuring contrastive entropy between base models and minimally instruction-tuned calibrated models reveals a pattern—samples with the lowest contrastive entropy consistently yield optimal performance across domains, yet this principle manifests domain-adaptively: reasoning tasks favor entropy increase (cognitive expansion), while general tasks favor entropy decrease (cognitive compression). We introduce InstructDiff, a unified framework that operationalizes contrastive entropy as a domain-adaptive selection criterion through warmup calibration, bi-directional NLL filtering, and entropy-based ranking. Extensive experiments show that InstructDiff achieves 17% relative improvement over full data training on mathematical reasoning and 52% for general instruction-following, outperforming prior baselines while using only 10% of the data.

Haoran Sun, Natthawut Kertkeidkachorn, Kiyoaki Shirai

Automatic soccer commentary generation aims to bridge the gap between raw visual content and professional, tactical commentary. However, existing datasets tend to produce incomplete commentary that lacks semantic richness and fails to convey the full visual information present in standard video clips. To address these limitations, we propose two manually curated datasets: SN-Short, which enhances scene-level semantic descriptions, and SN-Long, which captures event continuity for context-aware commentary.Based on these, we design a commentary augmentation pipeline that transforms incomplete annotations into MatchText, a semantically complete and structurally standardized dataset. Leveraging this supervision, we introduce MatchAware, a generation model that incorporates contextual cues from previous events to produce coherent commentary aligned with the visual flow of the game. Experimental results show that proposed approach significantly outperforms existing baselines on the constructed datasets.

Sashuai Zhou, Qiang Zhou, Jijin Hu, Hanqing Yang, Yue Cao, Junpeng Ma, Yinchao Ma, Jun Song, Tiezheng Ge, Cheng Yu 等

Despite impressive progress in high-fidelity image synthesis, generative models still struggle with logic-intensive instruction following, exposing a persistent reasoning–execution gap. Meanwhile, closed-source systems (e.g., Nano Banana) have demonstrated strong reasoning-driven image generation, highlighting a substantial gap to current open-source models. We argue that closing this gap requires not merely better visual generators, but executable reasoning: decomposing high-level intents into grounded, verifiable plans that directly steer the generative process. To this end, we propose Unified Thinker, a task-agnostic reasoning architecture for general image generation, designed as a unified planning core that can plug into diverse generators and workflows. Unified Thinker decouples a dedicated Thinker from the image Generator, enabling modular upgrades of reasoning without retraining the entire generative model. We further introduce a two-stage training paradigm: we first build a structured planning interface for the Thinker, then apply reinforcement learning to ground its policy in pixel-level feedback, encouraging plans that optimize visual correctness over textual plausibility. Extensive experiments on text-to-image generation and image editing show that Unified Thinker substantially improves image reasoning and generation quality.

Tomer Ashuach, Shai Gretz, Yoav Katz, Yonatan Belinkov, Liat Ein-Dor

Humans use introspection to evaluate their understanding through private internal states inaccessible to external observers. We investigate whether large language models possess similar privileged knowledge about answer correctness, information unavailable through external observation. We train correctness classifiers on question representations from both a model’s own hidden states and external models, testing whether self-representations provide a performance advantage. On standard evaluation, we find no advantage: self-probes perform comparably to peer-model probes. We hypothesize this is due to high inter-model agreement of answer correctness. To isolate genuine privileged knowledge, we evaluate on disagreement subsets, where models produce conflicting predictions. Here, we discover domain-specific privileged knowledge: self-representations consistently outperform peer representations in factual knowledge tasks, but show no advantage in math reasoning. We further localize this domain asymmetry across model layers, finding that the factual advantage emerges progressively from early-to-mid layers onward, consistent with model-specific memory retrieval, while math reasoning shows no consistent advantage at any depth.

Yihang Wang, Bin Wu, Yueyang Su, Tianfu Zhang, Yiqi Du, Lei Yu, Jiafeng Guo, Xueqi Cheng

Large embedding models have become the backbone of modern retrieval systems, offering strong semantic representations at the cost of substantial storage and computation. While recent work explores quantizing embeddings into discrete document identifiers for generative retrieval, most existing approaches rely on Euclidean quantization, which is poorly aligned with the angular geometry induced by contrastive embedding training and often requires long identifier sequences to preserve semantic fidelity. In this work, we propose Hyperspherical Householder Quantization (HHQ), a geometry-aware distillation method that compresses large embeddings into short discrete representations via iterative Householder transformations on the unit hypersphere. By explicitly preserving cosine similarity at each step, HHQ distills semantic structure into compact identifiers that remain faithful to the original embedding space. To support reliable generation of these identifiers, we introduce constrained supervised fine-tuning and tree-aware dynamic masking to enforce structural validity during training and inference. Experiments on NQ and MS MARCO show that HHQ achieves competitive or superior retrieval performance using only five tokens per document, substantially reducing decoding cost while retaining strong semantic retrieval accuracy.

Pei Chen, Xilai Wang, Shiqixu, Zejian Li, Lingyun Sun

Multimodal Continual Instruction Tuning (MCIT) is essential for adapting Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to dynamic data streams, yet preventing catastrophic forgetting remains a major challenge. Existing parameter-efficient approaches often face a dilemma: fixed architectures suffer from knowledge interference, while dynamic strategies incur inefficient capacity expansion, limiting scalability. We propose MoBLoRA (Mixture-of-Bases LoRA), a novel framework for MCIT. Motivated by our geometric analysis revealing subspace redundancy across sequential tasks, MoBLoRA shifts the paradigm from expert selection to subspace mixing: it decomposes adaptation weights into a globally shared pool of orthonormal bases to capture task-invariant knowledge, and lightweight mixing matrices to encode task-specific variations. This design effectively decouples knowledge accumulation from task reconstruction. Experiments on standard benchmarks show MoBLoRA significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods while maintaining superior parameter efficiency.

Wenqing Hou, Hongkui Tu, Ye Wang, Yue Zhang, Yuying Liu, Dong Zhu, Liqun Gao, Bin Zhou

The identification of harmful memes extends beyond a mere classification task, encompassing challenges related to multi-perspective semantic comprehension and hierarchical reasoning. Prevailing approaches predominantly depend on modal alignment or black-box classifiers, which fail to capture implicit biases and lack interpretability. In this study, we propose BPDMoE-Hate, a novel framework grounded in dual-space mixture-of-experts, which innovatively conceptualizes harmful meme detection as an integrated process of “viewpoint decoupling and hierarchical fusion”. Our approach generates adversarial binary perspectives via Visual-Language Models (VLMs) and incorporates an adaptive viewpoint gating to facilitate viewpoint selection, thereby enabling the model to autonomously discern implicit semantic inclinations. Moreover, we propose the Hyperbolic-Euclidean space expert to effectively capture the hierarchical structural relationships and semantic correlations between multimodal and viewpoint features, thereby enabling interpretable reasoning at the geometric representation level. Empirical evaluations conducted on three mainstream datasets demonstrate that BPDMoE-Hate not only substantially surpasses existing methodologies in performance but also offers visual explanations for viewpoint selection and hierarchical structuring, thereby advancing the field of interpretable multimodal content analysis.