Counterfactual reasoning is widely recognized as one of the most challenging and intricate aspects of causality in artificial intelligence. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of large language models (LLMs) in counterfactual reasoning. In contrast to previous studies that primarily focus on commonsense causal reasoning, where LLMs often rely on prior knowledge for inference, we specifically assess their ability to perform counterfactual inference using a set of formal rules. To support this evaluation, we introduce a new benchmark dataset, CounterBench, comprising 1.2K counterfactual reasoning questions. The dataset is designed with varying levels of difficulty, diverse causal graph structures, distinct types of counterfactual questions, and multiple nonsensical name variants. Our experiments demonstrate that counterfactual reasoning poses a significant challenge for LLMs, with most models performing at levels comparable to random guessing. To enhance LLM's counterfactual reasoning ability, we propose a novel reasoning paradigm, CoIn, which guides LLMs through iterative reasoning and backtracking to systematically explore counterfactual solutions. Experimental results show that our method significantly improves LLM performance on counterfactual reasoning tasks and consistently enhances performance across different LLMs.
论文检索
输入标题、作者或关键词，从 100,903 篇学术成果中精准定位
DiagramGPT-Llama3:Enabling Editable, High-Fidelity Diagram Generation with Vision Large Language Models
PDF ↗The automation of diagram generation has gained significant attention in recent years. Previous studies mainly focused on generating diagrams from natural language, but often lacked support for user-friendly editing like drag-and-drop. This paper proposes a novel task: generating editable, high-fidelity diagrams from either text or raster images. It is also among the first to introduce diagram restoration and style transfer in this setting.To tackle these tasks, we constructed the Diagram-mxGraph dataset, covering restoration, text-to-diagram generation, and style transfer. We propose two core innovations: Fine-grained Adaptive Background Suppression (FABS) and Component-Aware Adaptive Loss (CAAL). Leveraging pre-trained Vision Transformers (ViTs) and the Diagram Adapter module, our method aligns diagram features with a Large Language Model (LLM) to output diagrams in editable mxGraph format.
Scene graphs have emerged as a structured and serializable environment representation for grounded spatial reasoning with Large Language Models (LLMs). In this work, we propose SG2, an iterative Schema-Guided Scene-Graph reasoning framework based on multi-agent LLMs. The agents are grouped into two modules: a (1) Reasoner module for abstract task planning and graph information queries generation, and a (2) Retriever module for extracting corresponding graph information based on code-writing following the queries. Two modules collaborate iteratively, enabling sequential reasoning and adaptive attention to graph information. The scene graph schema, prompted to both modules, serves to not only streamline both reasoning and retrieval process, but also guide the cooperation between two modules. This eliminates the need to prompt LLMs with full graph data, reducing the chance of hallucination due to irrelevant information. Through experiments in multiple simulation environments, we show that our framework surpasses existing LLM-based approaches and baseline single-agent, tool-based Reason-while-Retrieve strategy in numerical Q&A and planning tasks.
As an essential component of fine-tuning, warm-up plays a crucial role in promoting stability and generalization. Many studies have examined its underlying mechanisms from different aspects. However, most of the studies focus on incorporating these insights into optimizers to reduce the reliance on warm-up. Little attention has been paid to addressing the inherent limitations of the warm-up itself, which restricts its effectiveness. In this work, we revisit warm-up from a loss landscape perspective and identify several limitations with existing warm-up, including: (1) susceptibility to nearby suboptimal traps, (2) sensitivity to hyperparameters and random seeds, and (3) inefficiency during the early stages of training. To overcome these limitations, we propose Sensitivity-Aware Warm-Up (SAWU), a lightweight and adaptive strategy that dynamically leverages learning sensitivity during warm-up to guide updates toward better and more stable basins. In addition, SAWU also introduces an adaptive scheduling mechanism and phase transition strategy across warm-up, stable, and decay phases to further enhance robustness and efficiency. Extensive experiments on various downstream tasks show that SAWU significantly outperforms the vanilla method (e.g., average 3.43% improvement on RoBerta). Moreover, SAWU can be easily combined with various optimizers and remains effective even when warm-up-based methods fail (e.g, it lifts RAdam from 49.46% to 91.78% on qnli. Thanks to its lightweight nature, SAWU introduces minimal overhead and even reduces training time by over 5% compared to other methods.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is an effective solution to overcome the limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs) in terms of specific-domain knowledge and timely information updates. However, current RAG methods typically respond to queries based on isolated segments, lacking the ability to integrate information within the same document. This undermines performance in real-world tasks requiring coherent understanding across an entire document. Notably, the human brain naturally integrates and summarizes prior knowledge upon reading a given text, progressively formulating a comprehensive understanding. Motivated by this cognitive process, we propose the Hierarchical Two-Stage Summarization-based Information Retrieval (HTSIR) method, which preprocesses the corpus prior to retrieval, summarizes continuous texts to obtain integrated information, and constructs a retrieval tree with varying summary granularities. The retrieved information is then processed by a Reranker based on the current question to serve as a context for LLMs. Additionally, as single-step summarization is often imprecise in query-based summarization tasks, we further apply a Refinement module, allowing LLMs to reflect and revise their output to achieve the final result. By combining HTSIR with GPT-4o mini, we achieve state-of-the-art results on complex question tasks across four long-text datasets (NarrativeQA, QASPER, QuALITY, and QMSum), achieving an improvement of about 6 points on the Question Answering (QA) task in QuALITY-HRAD.
Multimodal summarization with multimodal output (MSMO) aims to generate coherent textual summaries while selecting the most semantically relevant images to enhance expressiveness. Despite the advancements of large multimodal models like GPT-4o, LLaMA-3, and Grok-3, these models often exhibit hallucination and weak visual-text alignment when applied to MSMO tasks. To address these challenges, we propose ModalSyncSum, a unified framework that enhances semantic consistency and visual faithfulness. It incorporates image-aware information extraction to mitigate visual-text misalignment, QA-based description verification to detect and correct hallucinated image descriptions, and named entity-guided refinement to ensure factual accuracy and entity alignment across modalities. Furthermore, we introduce a new evaluation metric M3AS, which jointly considers image content coverage, text-image alignment, and summary consistency, filling the gap in evaluating multimodal summary quality. Experimental results show that our model outperforms prompt-based baselines across multiple datasets, achieving significant gains on ROUGE, BLEU, and BERTScore, with BLEU improving by 21.95%. In human evaluation, M3AS exhibits stronger correlation with human judgments in consistency, image-summary relevance, and focus, surpassing existing automatic metrics.
How Does Chain of Thought Think? Mechanistic Interpretability of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning with Sparse Autoencoding
PDF ↗Chain‑of‑thought (CoT) prompting boosts Large Language Models accuracy on multi‑step tasks, yet whether the generated ``thoughts'' reflect the true internal reasoning process is unresolved. We present the first feature‑level causal study of CoT faithfulness. Combining sparse autoencoders with activation patching, we extract monosemantic features from Pythia‑70M and Pythia‑2.8B while they tackle GSM8K math problems under CoT and plain (noCoT) prompting. Swapping a small set of CoT‑reasoning features into a noCoT run raises answer log‑probabilities significantly in the 2.8B model, but has no reliable effect in 70M, revealing a clear contrast for these two scales. CoT also leads to significantly higher activation sparsity and feature interpretability scores in the larger model, signalling more modular internal computation. For example, the model's confidence in generating correct answers improves from 1.2 to 4.3. We introduce patch‑curves and random‑feature patching baselines, showing that useful CoT information is not only present in the top-K patches but widely distributed. Overall, our results indicate that CoT can induce more interpretable internal structures in high-capacity LLMs, validating its role as a structured prompting method.
Effectively handling long contexts is challenging for Large Language Models (LLMs) due to the rarity of long texts, high computational demands, and substantial forgetting of short-context abilities. Recent approaches have attempted to construct long contexts for instruction tuning, but these methods often require LLMs or human interventions, which are both costly and limited in length and diversity. Also, the drop in short-context performances of present long-context LLMs remains significant. In this paper, we introduce Flora, an effortless (human/LLM-free) long-context construction strategy. Flora can markedly enhance the long-context performance of LLMs by arbitrarily assembling short instructions based on categories and instructing LLMs to generate responses based on long-context meta-instructions. This enables Flora to produce contexts of arbitrary length and scale with rich diversity, while only slightly compromising short-context performance. Experiments on Llama3-8B-Instruct and QwQ-32B show that LLMs enhanced by Flora excel in three long-context benchmarks while maintaining strong performances in short-context tasks.
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have greatly improved their reasoning and decision-making abilities when deployed as agents. Richer reasoning, however, often comes at the cost of longer chain of thought (CoT), hampering interaction efficiency in real-world scenarios. Nevertheless, there still lacks systematic definition of LLM‑Agent efficiency, hindering targeted improvements. To this end, we introduce dual‑efficiency, comprising (i) step-level efficiency, which minimizes tokens per step, and (ii) trajectory-level efficiency, which minimizes the number of steps to complete a task. Building on this definition, we propose DEPO, a dual-efficiency preference‑based optimization method that jointly rewards succinct responses and fewer action steps. Experiments on WebShop and BabyAI show that DEPO cuts token usage by up to 60.9% and steps by up to 26.9%, while achieving up to a 29.3% improvement in task performance. DEPO also generalizes to three out-of-domain math benchmarks and retains its efficiency gains when trained on only 25% of the data.
You Don’t Need Pre-Built Graphs for RAG: Retrieval Augmented Generation with Adaptive Reasoning Structures
PDF ↗Large language models (LLMs) often suffer from hallucination, generating factually incorrect statements when handling questions beyond their knowledge and perception. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) addresses this by retrieving query-relevant contexts from knowledge bases to support LLM reasoning. Recent advances leverage pre-constructed graphs to capture the relational connections among distributed documents, showing remarkable performance in complex tasks. However, existing Graph-based RAG (GraphRAG) methods rely on a costly process to transform the corpus into a graph, introducing overwhelming token cost and update latency. Moreover, real-world queries vary in type and complexity, requiring different logic structures for accurate reasoning. The pre-built graph may not align with these required structures, resulting in ineffective knowledge retrieval. To this end, we propose a Logic-aware Retrieval Augmented Generation framework (LogicRAG) that dynamically extracts reasoning structures at inference time to guide adaptive retrieval without any pre-built graph. LogicRAG begins by decomposing the input query into a set of subproblems and constructing a directed acyclic graph (DAG) to model the logical dependencies among them. To support coherent multi-step reasoning, LogicRAG then linearizes the graph using topological sort, so that subproblems can be addressed in a logically consistent order. Besides, LogicRAG applies graph pruning to reduce redundant retrieval and uses context pruning to filter irrelevant context, significantly reducing the overall token cost. Extensive experiments demonstrate that LogicRAG achieves both superior performance and efficiency compared to state-of-the-art baselines.
Aware First, Think Less: Dynamic Boundary Self-Awareness Drives Significant Gains in Reasoning Efficiency in Large Language Models
PDF ↗Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have greatly improved their ability to perform complex reasoning tasks through Long Chain-of-Thought (CoT). However, this approach often results in substantial redundancy, impairing computational efficiency and causing significant delays in real-time applications. To improve efficiency, current methods often rely on human-defined difficulty priors, which do not align with the LLM's self-awared difficulty, leading to inefficiencies. In this paper, we introduce the Dynamic Reasoning-Boundary Self-Awareness Framework (DR. SAF), which enables LLMs to dynamically assess and adjust their reasoning depth in response to problem complexity. DR. SAF integrates three key components: Boundary Self-Awareness Alignment, Adaptive Reward Management, and a Boundary Preservation Mechanism. These components allow models to optimize their reasoning processes, balancing efficiency and accuracy without compromising performance. Our experimental results demonstrate that DR. SAF achieves a 49.27% reduction in total response tokens with minimal loss in accuracy. The framework also delivers a 6.59x gain in token efficiency and a 5x reduction in training time, making it well-suited to resource-limited settings. During extreme training, DR. SAF can even surpass traditional instruction-based models in token efficiency with more than 16% accuracy improvement.
DeFuzzRAG: Handling Fuzzy Time Expressions for Temporal Robustness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
PDF ↗Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across reasoning and knowledge-intensive tasks, yet their static pretraining leaves them unable to handle rapidly evolving or domain-specific knowledge. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses this by grounding LLM outputs in dynamically retrieved evidence, improving factual accuracy and reducing hallucinations. However, standard RAG pipelines struggle with temporally sensitive queries, especially when documents contain fuzzy or indirect time expressions (e.g., “a few years later”). This leads to Temporal Misalignment, where topically relevant but temporally incorrect results are retrieved. To overcome this, we propose DeFuzzRAG, a lightweight framework that enhances temporal robustness in RAG. DeFuzzRAG employs a small local language model to infer concrete time scopes from vague expressions and applies metadata-based filtering to realign retrieval with the query’s temporal intent. Experiments on a benchmark of fuzzified queries demonstrate that DeFuzzRAG substantially improves retrieval accuracy, raising Hit Rate by 15.7% while maintaining efficiency and model-agnostic integration. Our findings highlight the importance of temporal reasoning in RAG and establish DeFuzzRAG as a practical, plug-and-play solution for deploying temporally robust LLM systems in real-world settings.
Learning from Scoring Disagreements: Contrastive Error Mining for Efficient and Robust LLM-based Assessment
PDF ↗Automated grading of student responses still faces numerous challenges, particularly when dealing with complex and ambiguous answers. In particular, large models are prone to scoring bias when handling uncertain responses, and few-shot reasoning methods often lack stability, which limits their applicability in real educational scenarios. To tackle these challenges, we propose the Contrastive Error Mining and FineTuning (CEM-FT) framework, which automatically identifies high-value hard samples by analyzing scoring disagreements between a full fine-tuned model and a few-shot model. A lightweight LoRA adapter is then trained on these samples to refine model performance with minimal computational overhead. Experiments on the SciEntsbank, Beetle, and Mohler datasets show that CEM-FT can improve QWK by up to 3.9% compared to the fine-tuned Qwen model on SciEntsbank datasets, which is a significant improvement over the few-shot baseline. The proposed framework substantially enhances both scoring accuracy and consistency, providing a practical, robust solution for reliable automated assessment with large language models.
Auto-PRE: An Automatic and Cost-Efficient Peer-Review Framework for Language Generation Evaluation
PDF ↗The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has highlighted the need for efficient and reliable methods to evaluate their performance. Traditional evaluation methods often face challenges like high costs, limited task formats, dependence on human references, and systematic biases. To address these limitations, we propose Auto-PRE, an automatic LLM evaluation framework inspired by the peer review process. Unlike previous approaches that rely on human annotations, Auto-PRE automatically selects evaluator LLMs based on three core traits: consistency, pertinence, and self-confidence, which correspond to the instruction, content, and response stages, respectively, and collectively cover the entire evaluation process. Experiments on three representative tasks, including summarization, non-factoid QA, and dialogue generation, demonstrate that Auto-PRE achieves state-of-the-art performance while significantly reducing evaluation costs. Furthermore, the structured and scalable design of our automatic qualification exam framework provides valuable insights into automating the evaluation of LLMs-as-judges, paving the way for more advanced LLM-based evaluation frameworks.
Rethinking Label Consistency of In-Context Learning: An Implicit Transductive Label Propagation Perspective
PDF ↗Large language models (LLMs) perform in-context learning (ICL) with minimal supervised examples, which benefits various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. One of the critical research focus is the selection of prompt demonstrations. Current approaches typically employ retrieval models to select the top-K most semantically similar examples as demonstrations. However, we argue that existing methods are limited since the label consistency is not guaranteed during demonstration selection. Our cognition derives from the Bayesian view of ICL and our rethinking of ICL from the transductive label propagation perspective. We treat ICL as a transductive learning method and incorporate latent concepts from Bayesian view and deduce that similar demonstrations guide the concepts of query, with consistent labels serving as estimates. Based on this understanding, we establish a label propagation framework to link label consistency with propagation error bounds. To model label consistency, we propose a data synthesis method, leveraging both semantic and label information, and use TopK sampling with Synthetic Data (TopK-SD) to acquire demonstrations with consistent labels. TopK-SD outperforms original TopK sampling on multiple benchmarks. Our work provides a new perspective for understanding the working mechanisms within ICL.
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) achieve impressive performance once optimized on massive datasets. Such datasets often contain sensitive or copyrighted content, raising significant data privacy concerns. Regulatory frameworks mandating the 'right to be forgotten' drive the need for machine unlearning. This technique allows for the removal of target data without resource-consuming retraining. However, while well-studied for text, visual concept unlearning in MLLMs remains underexplored. A primary challenge is precisely removing a target visual concept without disrupting model performance on related entities. To address this, we introduce AUVIC, a novel visual concept unlearning framework for MLLMs. AUVIC applies adversarial perturbations to enable precise forgetting. This approach effectively isolates the target concept while avoiding unintended effects on similar entities. To evaluate our method, we construct VCUBench. It is the first benchmark designed to assess visual concept unlearning in group contexts. Experimental results demonstrate that AUVIC achieves state-of-the-art target forgetting rates while incurs minimal performance degradation on non-target concepts.
Circuit graph discovery has emerged as a fundamental approach to elucidating the skill mechanistic of language models. Despite the output faithfulness of circuit graphs, they suffer from atomic ablation, which causes the loss of causal dependencies between connected components. In addition, their discovery process, designed to preserve output faithfulness, inadvertently captures extraneous effects other than an isolated target skill. To alleviate these challenges, we introduce skill paths, which offer a more refined and compact representation by isolating individual skills within a linear chain of components. To enable skill path extracting from circuit graphs, we propose a three-step framework, consisting of decomposition, pruning, and post-hoc causal mediation. In particular, we offer a complete linear decomposition of the transformer model which leads to a disentangled computation graph. After pruning, we further adopt causal analysis techniques, including counterfactuals and interventions, to extract the final skill paths from the circuit graph. To underscore the significance of skill paths, we investigate three generic language skills—Previous Token Skill, Induction Skill, and In-Context Learning Skill—using our framework. Experiments support two crucial properties of these skills, namely stratification and inclusiveness.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) effectively enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) by incorporating retrieved external knowledge into the generation process. Reasoning models improve LLM performance in multi-hop QA tasks, which require integrating and reasoning over multiple pieces of evidence across different documents to answer a complex question. However, they often introduce substantial computational costs, including increased token consumption and inference latency. To better understand and mitigate this trade-off, we conduct a comprehensive study of reasoning strategies for reasoning models in RAG multi-hop QA tasks. Our findings reveal that reasoning models adopt structured strategies to integrate retrieved and internal knowledge, primarily following two modes: Context-Grounded Reasoning, which relies directly on retrieved content, and Knowledge-Reconciled Reasoning, which resolves conflicts or gaps using internal knowledge. To this end, we propose a novel Lightweight Rerank Reasoning Strategy Framework for RAG (LiR³AG) to enable non-reasoning models to transfer reasoning strategies by restructuring retrieved evidence into coherent reasoning chains. LiR³AG significantly reduce the average 98% output tokens overhead and 58.6% inferencing time while improving 8B non-reasoning model's F1 performance ranging from 6.2% to 22.5% to surpass the performance of 32B reasoning model in RAG, offering a practical and efficient path forward for RAG systems.
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a new information channel. Meanwhile, one critical but under-explored question is: Is it possible to bypass the safety alignment and inject harmful information into LLMs stealthily? In this paper, we propose to reformulate knowledge editing as a new type of safety threat for LLMs, namely Editing Attack, and conduct a systematic investigation with a newly constructed dataset EditAttack. Specifically, we focus on two typical safety risks of Editing Attack including Misinformation Injection and Bias Injection. For the first risk, we find that editing attacks can inject both commonsense and long-tail misinformation into LLMs, and the effectiveness for the former one is particularly high. For the second risk, we discover that not only can biased sentences be injected into LLMs with high effectiveness, but also one single biased sentence injection can degrade the overall fairness. Then, we further illustrate the high stealthiness of editing attacks. Our discoveries demonstrate the emerging misuse risks of knowledge editing techniques on compromising the safety alignment of LLMs and the feasibility of disseminating misinformation or bias with LLMs as new channels.
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) improves the response quality of large language models (LLMs) by retrieving knowledge from external databases. Typical RAG approaches split the text database into chunks, organizing them in a flat structure for efficient searches. To better capture the inherent dependencies and structured relationships across the text database, researchers propose to organize textual information into an indexing graph, known as graph-based RAG. However, we argue that the limitation of current graph-based RAG methods lies in the redundancy of the retrieved information, rather than its insufficiency. Moreover, previous methods use a flat structure to organize retrieved information within the prompts, leading to suboptimal performance. To overcome these limitations, we propose PathRAG, which retrieves key relational paths from the indexing graph, and converts these paths into textual form for prompting LLMs. Specifically, PathRAG effectively reduces redundant information with flow-based pruning, while guiding LLMs to generate more logical and coherent responses with path-based prompting. Experimental results show that PathRAG consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines across six datasets and five evaluation dimensions.