论文检索

Xintong Wang, Jingheng Pan, Liang Ding, Longyue Wang, Longqin Jiang, Xingshan Li, Chris Biemann

Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve remarkable performance through pretraining on extensive data. This enables efficient adaptation to diverse downstream tasks. However, the lack of interpretability in their underlying mechanisms limits the ability to effectively steer LLMs for specific applications. In this work, we investigate the intrinsic mechanisms of LLMs from a cognitive perspective using eye movement measures. Specifically, we analyze the layer-wise correlation between human cognitive indicators and LLM representations. Building on these insights, we propose a heuristic approach for selecting the optimal steering layer to modulate LLM semantics. To this end, we introduce an efficient selective layer intervention based on prominent parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods, which conventionally adjust either all layers or only the final layer. Additionally, we present an implicit layer contrastive intervention during inference to steer LLMs away from toxic outputs. Extensive experiments on natural language understanding, reasoning, and generation tasks, conducted on GPT-2, LLaMa2-7B, and Mixtral-7B, demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our approach. As a model-agnostic framework, it enhances the interpretability of LLMs while improving efficiency for safe deployment.

Guillermo Marco, Julio Gonzalo, Víctor Fresno

Recent studies comparing AI-generated and human-authored literary texts have produced conflicting results: some suggest AI already surpasses human quality, while others argue it still falls short. We start from the hypothesis that such divergences can be largely explained by genuine differences in how readers interpret and value literature, rather than by an intrinsic quality of the texts evaluated. Using five public datasets (1,471 stories, 101 annotators including critics, students, and lay readers), we (i) extract 17 reference-less textual features (e.g., coherence, emotional variance, average sentence length...); (ii) model individual reader preferences, deriving feature importance vectors that reflect their textual priorities; and (iii) analyze these vectors in a shared “preference space”. Reader vectors cluster into two profiles: _surface-focused readers_ (mainly non-experts), who prioritize readability and textual richness; and _holistic readers_ (mainly experts), who value thematic development, rhetorical variety, and sentiment dynamics. Our results quantitatively explain how measurements of literary quality are a function of how text features align with each reader’s preferences. These findings advocate for reader-sensitive evaluation frameworks in the field of creative text generation.

Vicky Xefteri, Tim Vieira, Ryan Cotterell, Afra Amini

Controlling the syntactic structure of text generated by language models is valuable for applications requiring clarity, stylistic consistency, or interpretability, yet it remains a challenging task. In this paper, we argue that sampling algorithms based on the posterior inference can effectively enforce a target constituency structure during generation. Our approach combines sequential Monte Carlo, which estimates the posterior distribution by sampling from a proposal distribution, with a syntactic tagger that ensures that each generated token aligns with the desired syntactic structure. Our experiments with GPT2 and Llama3-8B models show that with an appropriate proposal distribution, we can improve syntactic accuracy, increasing the F1 score from 12.31 (GPT2-large) and 35.33 (Llama3-8B) to about 93 in both cases without compromising the language model’s fluency. These results underscore both the complexity of syntactic control and the effectiveness of sampling algorithms, offering a promising approach for applications where precise control over syntax is essential.

Gitanjali Kumari, Jitendra Solanki, Asif Ekbal

Toxic memes often spread harmful and offensive content and pose a significant challenge in online environments. In this paper, we present MemeDetoxNet, a robust framework designed to mitigate toxicity in memes by leveraging fine-tuned pre-trained models. Our approach utilizes the interpretability of CLIP (Contrastive Language-Image Pre-Training) to identify toxic elements within the visual and textual components of memes. Our objective is to automatically assess the immorality of toxic memes and transform them into morally acceptable alternatives by employing large language models (LLMs) to replace offensive text and blurring toxic regions in the image. As a result, we proposed MemeDetoxNet that has three main primitives: (1) detection of toxic memes, (2) localizing and highlighting toxic visual and textual attributes, and (3) manipulating the toxic content to create a morally acceptable alternative. Empirical evaluation on several publicly available meme datasets shows a reduction in toxicity by approximately 10-20%. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses further demonstrate MemeDetoxNet’s superior performance in detoxifying memes compared to the other methods. These results underscore MemeDetoxNet’s potential as an effective tool for content moderation on online platforms.

Omkar Thawakar, Dinura Dissanayake, Ketan Pravin More, Ritesh Thawkar, Ahmed Heakl, Noor Ahsan, Yuhao Li, Ilmuz Zaman Mohammed Zumri, Jean Lahoud, Rao Muhammad Anwer 等

Step-by-step reasoning is crucial for solving complex visual tasks, yet existing approaches lack a comprehensive framework for evaluating this capability and do not emphasize step-wise problem-solving. To this end, we propose a comprehensive framework for advancing multi-step visual reasoning in large multimodal models (LMMs) through three key contributions. First, we introduce a Visual Reasoning Chain Benchmark, the most comprehensive benchmark for multi-step visual reasoning, covering eight diverse categories and over 4k reasoning steps. This enables rigorous evaluation of LMMs’ ability to reason accurately and interpretably across multiple steps. Second, we propose a fine-grained reasoning metric that evaluates correctness and logical coherence at each step, providing deeper insights beyond traditional accuracy metrics. Third, we introduce LlamaV-o1, a state-of-the-art multimodal reasoning model trained using a multi-step curriculum learning approach. LlamaV-o1 is optimized for structured, step-by-step reasoning and significantly outperforms existing open-source models. It surpasses Llava-CoT with a 3.8% absolute gain across six benchmarks, achieving an average score of 67.3 while being 5x faster during inference scaling. Our benchmark, model, and code is available at https://github.com/mbzuai-oryx/LlamaV-o1.

Simeon Junker, Manar Ali, Larissa Koch, Sina Zarrieß, Hendrik Buschmeier

We investigate the linguistic abilities of multimodal large language models in reference resolution tasks featuring simple yet abstract visual stimuli, such as color patches and color grids. Although the task may not seem challenging for today’s language models, being straightforward for human dyads, we consider it to be a highly relevant probe of the pragmatic capabilities of MLLMs. Our results and analyses indeed suggest that basic pragmatic capabilities, such as context-dependent interpretation of color descriptions, still constitute major challenges for state-of-the-art MLLMs.

Settaluri Lakshmi Sravanthi, Kishan Maharaj, Sravani Gunnu, Abhijit Mishra, Pushpak Bhattacharyya

Pragmatics, the ability to infer meaning beyond literal interpretation, is crucial for social cognition and communication. While LLMs have been benchmarked for their pragmatic understanding, improving their performance remains underexplored. Existing methods rely on annotated labels but overlook the reasoning process humans naturally use to interpret implicit meaning. To bridge this gap, we introduce a novel pragmatic dataset ImpliedMeaningPreference that includes explicit reasoning (‘thoughts’) for both correct and incorrect interpretations. Through preference-tuning and supervised fine-tuning, we demonstrate that thought-based learning significantly enhances LLMs’ pragmatic understanding, improving accuracy by 11.12% across model families. We further discuss a transfer-learning study where we evaluate the performance of thought-based training for the other tasks of pragmatics (presupposition, deixis) that are not seen during the training time and observe an improvement of 16.10% compared to label trained models.

Mounika Marreddy, Subba Reddy Oota, Venkata Charan Chinni, Manish Gupta, Lucie Flek

Analyzing user opinion changes in long conversation threads is extremely critical for applications like enhanced personalization, market research, political campaigns, customer service, targeted advertising, and content moderation. Unfortunately, previous studies on stance and dogmatism in user conversations have focused on training models using datasets annotated at the post level, treating each post as independent and randomly sampling posts from conversation threads. Hence, first, we build a dataset for studying user opinion fluctuations in 764 long multi-user Reddit conversation threads, called USDC. USDC contains annotations for 2 tasks: i) User Stance classification, which involves labeling a user’s stance in a post within a conversation on a five-point scale; ii) User Dogmatism classification, which involves labeling a user’s overall opinion in the conversation on a four-point scale. Besides being time-consuming and costly, manual annotations for USDC are challenging because: 1) Conversation threads could be very long, increasing the chances of noisy annotations; and 2) Interpreting instances where a user changes their opinion within a conversation is difficult because often such transitions are subtle and not expressed explicitly. Hence, we leverage majority voting on zero-shot, one-shot, and few-shot annotations from Mistral Large and GPT-4 to automate the annotation process. Human annotations on 200 test conversations achieved inter-annotator agreement scores of 0.49 for stance and 0.50 for dogmatism with these LLM annotations, indicating a reasonable level of consistency between human and LLM annotations. USDC is then used to finetune and instruction-tune multiple deployable small language models like LLaMA, Falcon and Vicuna for the stance and dogmatism classification tasks. We make the code and dataset publicly available [https://github.com/mounikamarreddy/USDC].

Sara Ghaboura, Ketan Pravin More, Ritesh Thawkar, Wafa Al Ghallabi, Omkar Thawakar, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, Hisham Cholakkal, Salman Khan, Rao Muhammad Anwer

Understanding historical and cultural artifacts demands human expertise and advanced computational techniques, yet the process remains complex and time-intensive. While large multimodal models offer promising support, their evaluation and improvement require a standardized benchmark. To address this, we introduce TimeTravel, a benchmark of 10,250 expert-verified samples spanning 266 distinct cultures across 10 major historical regions. Designed for AI-driven analysis of manuscripts, artworks, inscriptions, and archaeological discoveries, TimeTravel provides a structured dataset and robust evaluation framework to assess AI models’ capabilities in classification, interpretation, and historical comprehension. By integrating AI with historical research, TimeTravel fosters AI-powered tools for historians, archaeologists, researchers, and cultural tourists to extract valuable insights while ensuring technology contributes meaningfully to historical discovery and cultural heritage preservation. We evaluate contemporary AI models on TimeTravel, highlighting their strengths and identifying areas for improvement. Our goal is to establish AI as a reliable partner in preserving cultural heritage, ensuring that technological advancements contribute meaningfully to historical discovery. We release the TimeTravel dataset and evaluation suite as open-source resources for culturally and historically informed research.

Metehan Oğuz, Yavuz Faruk Bakman, Duygu Nur Yaldiz

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performances in tasks related to coreference resolution. However, previous studies mostly assessed LLM performance on coreference resolution with nouns and third person pronouns. This study evaluates LLM performance on coreference resolution with indexical like I, you, here and tomorrow which come with unique challenges due to their linguistic properties. We present the first study examining how LLMs interpret indexicals in English, releasing the English Indexical Dataset with 1600 multiple-choice questions. We evaluate pioneering LLMs, including GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemini 1.5 Pro, and DeepSeek V3. Our results reveal that LLMs exhibit an impressive performance with some indexicals (I), while struggling with others (you, here, tomorrow), and that syntactic cues (e.g. quotation) contribute to LLM performance with some indexicals, while they reduce performance with others. Code and data are available at: https://github.com/metehanoguzz/LLMs-Indexicals-English

Vihang Pancholi, Jainit Sushil Bafna, Tejas Anvekar, Manish Shrivastava, Vivek Gupta

Evaluating tables qualitatively and quantitatively poses a significant challenge, as standard metrics often overlook subtle structural and content-level discrepancies. To address this, we propose a rubric-based evaluation framework that integrates multi-level structural descriptors with fine-grained contextual signals, enabling more precise and consistent table comparison. Building on this, we introduce TabXEval, an eXhaustive and eXplainable two-phase evaluation framework. TabXEval first aligns reference and predicted tables structurally via TabAlign, then performs semantic and syntactic comparison using TabCompare, offering interpretable and granular feedback. We evaluate TabXEval on TabXBench, a diverse, multi-domain benchmark featuring realistic table perturbations and human annotations. A sensitivity-specificity analysis further demonstrates the robustness and explainability of TabXEval across varied table tasks. Code and data are available at https://corallab- asu.github.io/tabxeval/.

Nengbo Wang, Xiaotian Han, Jagdip Singh, Jing Ma, Vipin Chaudhary

Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing (NLP), particularly through Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), which enhances LLM capabilities by integrating external knowledge. However, traditional RAG systems face critical limitations, including disrupted contextual integrity due to text chunking, and over-reliance on semantic similarity for retrieval. To address these issues, we propose CausalRAG, a novel framework that incorporates causal graphs into the retrieval process. By constructing and tracing causal relationships, CausalRAG preserves contextual continuity and improves retrieval precision, leading to more accurate and interpretable responses. We evaluate CausalRAG against regular RAG and graph-based RAG approaches, demonstrating its superiority across multiple metrics. Our findings suggest that grounding retrieval in causal reasoning provides a promising approach to knowledge-intensive tasks.

EunJeong Hwang, Peter West, Vered Shwartz

Humor is prevalent in online communications and it often relies on more than one modality (e.g., cartoons and memes).Interpreting humor in multimodal settings requires drawing on diverse types of knowledge, including metaphorical, sociocultural, and commonsense knowledge. However, identifying the most useful knowledge remains an open question. We introduce BottleHumor, a method inspired by the information bottleneck principle that elicits relevant world knowledge from vision and language models which is iteratively refined for generating an explanation of the humor in an unsupervised manner. Our experiments on three datasets confirm the advantage of our method over a range of baselines. Our method can further be adapted in the future for additional tasks that can benefit from eliciting and conditioning on relevant world knowledge and open new research avenues in this direction.

Tuo Zhang, Tiantian Feng, Yibin Ni, Mengqin Cao, Ruying Liu, Kiana Avestimehr, Katharine Butler, Yanjun Weng, Mi Zhang, Shrikanth Narayanan 等

Large vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable abilities in understanding everyday content. However, their performance in the domain of art, particularly culturally rich art forms, remains less explored. As a pearl of human wisdom and creativity, art encapsulates complex cultural narratives and symbolism. In this paper, we offer the Pun Rebus Art Dataset, a multimodal dataset for art understanding deeply rooted in traditional Chinese culture. We focus on three primary tasks: identifying salient visual elements, matching elements with their symbolic meanings, and explanations for the conveyed messages. Our evaluation reveals that state-of-the-art VLMs struggle with these tasks, often providing biased and hallucinated explanations and showing limited improvement through in-context learning. By releasing the Pun Rebus Art Dataset, we aim to facilitate the development of VLMs that can better understand and interpret culturally specific content, promoting greater inclusiveness beyond English-based corpora. The dataset and evaluation code are available at [this link](https://github.com/zhang-tuo-pdf/Pun-Rebus-Art-Benchmark).

Raymond Li, Chuyuan Li, Gabriel Murray, Giuseppe Carenini

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive generative capabilities, yet their inner mechanisms remain largely opaque. In this work, we introduce a novel approach to interpret LLMs generation process through the lens of an explicit Bayesian framework by inferring latent topic variables via variational inference. Specifically, we leverage a variational autoencoder-based neural topic model to dynamically approximate the posterior distribution over the high-level latent topic variables at each generation step. By reconstructing the LLM’s next-token predictions through these latent topics and maintaining a regularized latent space, our method yields interpretable and diverse topic representations but also has the ability to effectively captures semantic shifts throughout the text. We validate our approach on multiple datasets, showing that our latent topics outperform state-of-the-art topic models on intrinsic measures of coherence and diversity. Furthermore, we demonstrate the utility of our approach in downstream applications by using the inferred topic distributions to retrieve relevant demonstration examples for in-context learning, resulting in significant gains on classification and summarization tasks.

Hoyun Song, Huije Lee, Jisu Shin, Sukmin Cho, Changgeon Ko, Jong C. Park

The detection of mental health problems from social media and the interpretation of these results have been extensively explored. Research has shown that incorporating clinical symptom information into a model enhances domain expertise, improving its detection and interpretation performance. While large language models (LLMs) are shown to be effective for generating explanatory rationales in mental health detection, their substantially big parameter size and high computational cost limit their practicality. Reasoning distillation transfers this ability to smaller language models (SLMs), but inconsistencies in the relevance and domain alignment of LLM-generated rationales pose a challenge. This paper investigates how rationale quality impacts SLM performance in mental health detection and explanation generation. We hypothesize that ensuring high-quality and domain-relevant rationales enhances the distillation. To this end, we propose a framework that selects rationales based on their alignment with expert clinical reasoning. Experiments show that our quality-focused approach significantly enhances SLM performance in both mental disorder detection and rationale generation. This work highlights the importance of rationale quality and offers an insightful framework for knowledge transfer in mental health applications.

Yihuai Hong, Meng Cao, Dian Zhou, Lei Yu, Zhijing Jin

Large language models (LLMs) excel on a variety of reasoning benchmarks, but previous studies suggest they sometimes struggle to generalize to unseen questions, potentially due to over-reliance on memorized training examples. However, the precise conditions under which LLMs switch between reasoning and memorization during text generation remain unclear. In this work, we provide a mechanistic understanding of LLMs’ reasoning-memorization dynamics by identifying a set of linear features in the model’s residual stream that govern the balance between genuine reasoning and memory recall. These features not only distinguish reasoning tasks from memory-intensive ones but can also be manipulated to causally influence model performance on reasoning tasks. Additionally, we show that intervening in these reasoning features helps the model more accurately activate the most relevant problem-solving capabilities during answer generation. Our findings offer new insights into the underlying mechanisms of reasoning and memory in LLMs and pave the way for the development of more robust and interpretable generative AI systems. Our code and data are at https://github.com/yihuaihong/Linear_Reasoning_Memory_Features.

Chenyang Bu, Guojie Chang, Zihao Chen, CunYuan Dang, Zhize Wu, Yi He, Xindong Wu

An increasing adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) in complex reasoning tasks necessitates their interpretability and reliability. Recent advances to that end include retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and knowledge graph-enhanced RAG (GraphRAG), whereas they are constrained by static knowledge bases and ineffective multimodal data integration. In response, we propose a Query-Driven Multimodal GraphRAG framework that dynamically constructs local knowledge graphs tailored to query semantics. Our approach 1) derives graph patterns from query semantics to guide knowledge extraction, 2) employs a multi-path retrieval strategy to pinpoint core knowledge, and 3) supplements missing multimodal information ad hoc. Experimental results on the MultimodalQA and WebQA datasets demonstrate that our framework achieves the state-of-the-art performance among unsupervised competitors, particularly excelling in cross-modal understanding of complex queries.

Mengyu Ye, Tatsuki Kuribayashi, Goro Kobayashi, Jun Suzuki

Interpreting the internal process of neural models has long been a challenge. This challenge remains relevant in the era of large language models (LLMs) and in-context learning (ICL); for example, ICL poses a new issue of interpreting which example in the few-shot examples contributed to identifying/solving the task. To this end, in this paper, we design synthetic diagnostic tasks of inductive reasoning, inspired by the generalization tests in linguistics; here, most in-context examples are ambiguous w.r.t. their underlying rule, and one critical example disambiguates the task demonstrated. The question is whether conventional input attribution (IA) methods can track such a reasoning process, i.e., identify the influential example, in ICL. Our experiments provide several practical findings; for example, a certain simple IA method works the best, and the larger the model, the generally harder it is to interpret the ICL with gradient-based IA methods.

Guangyue Peng, Wei Li, Wen Luo, Houfeng Wang

Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) involves detecting and correcting the wrong usage of grammar. While large language models (LLMs) with in-context learning (ICL) capabilities have shown significant progress on various natural language processing (NLP) tasks, their few-shot performance on GEC remains suboptimal. This is mainly due to the challenge of retrieving suitable in-context demonstrations that capture error patterns instead of semantic similarity. In this paper, we demonstrate that LLMs can inherently capture information related to grammatical errors through their internal states. From these states, we extract the Grammatical Error Representation (GER), an informative and semantically neutral encoding of grammatical errors. Our novel GER-based retrieval method significantly boosts performance in ICL settings on multilingual GEC datasets, improving the precision of correction. For high-resource languages, our results on 8B-sized open-source models match those of closed-source models such as Deepseek2.5 and GPT-4o-mini. For low-resource languages, our F_{0.5} scores surpass the baseline by up to a factor of 1.2. This method provides a more precise and resource-efficient solution for multilingual GEC, offering a promising direction for interpretable GEC research.