论文检索

Computer Vision · Vision Models & Multimodal

Sijing Li, Zhongwei Qiu, Jiang Liu, Wenqiao Zhang, Tianwei Lin, Yihan Xie, Jianxiang An, Boxiang Yun, Chenglin Yang, Jun Xiao 等

Accurate tumor analysis is central to clinical radiology and precision oncology, where early detection, reliable lesion characterization, and pathology-level risk assessment directly guide diagnosis, staging, and treatment planning. Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning is particularly critical in this setting, as it enables stepwise interpretation from imaging findings to clinical impressions and pathology-level conclusions, ensuring traceability and reducing diagnostic errors. Here, we target the clinical tumor analysis task and build a large-scale benchmark that operationalizes a multimodal reasoning pipeline, spanning findings, impressions, and pathology predictions. We curate TumorCoT, a large-scale dataset of 1.5M CoT-labeled VQA instructions paired with 3D CT scans, with step-aligned rationales and cross-modal alignments along the “findings → impression → pathology” trajectory, enabling standardized evaluation of both final accuracy and reasoning consistency. We further propose TumorChain, a multimodal interleaved reasoning framework that tightly couples 3D imaging encoders, clinical text understanding, and organ-level vision-language alignment. Through cross-modal alignment and iterative interleaved causal reasoning, TumorChain grounds visual evidence, aggregates conclusions, and issues pathology predictions after multiple rounds of self-refinement, improving traceability and reducing hallucination risk. TumorChain demonstrates consistent gains over strong unimodal and pipeline baselines in lesion detection, impression quality, and pathology classification, and successfully generalizes to the public DeepTumorVQA benchmark. Ablations validate the key contributions of interleaved reasoning and clinical CoT. Clinically, these advances lay the groundwork for reliable, interpretable tumor assessment to support real-world decision-making. To advance safe, explainable, and reproducible multimodal reasoning for high-stakes tumor analysis, detailed information about our project can be found on our project homepage at https://github.com/ZJU4HealthCare/TumorChain.

Social Aspects · Fairness, Equity, Justice and Safety

Jingyu Zhang, Kun Yang, Ming Wen, Zhuoer Xu, Zeyang Sha, shiwen cui, Zhaohui Yang

Multimodal Large Reasoning Models (MLRMs) have exhibited remarkable capabilities in complex multimodal tasks. However, our findings reveal a critical trade-off: reasoning-based models are more prone to generating harmful content, leading to degradation in safety performance. This paper presents a large-scale analysis of this safety–reasoning trade-off, identifying two main mechanisms of safety degradation: (i) visual attention drift, which reduces the model’s reliance on visual grounding and thereby exacerbates overlooked risks in cross-modal interactions; (ii) unsafe reasoning patterns, including flawed reasoning initiation and chain-of-thought safety attenuation, which compromise the model’s safety awareness. To mitigate these issues, we propose **P**olicy-guided **S**afety **T**uning (**PST**), a two-stage alignment framework. It first employs *Policy-Guided Supervised Fine-Tuning* to integrate explicit safety policies into the reasoning process, establishing a structured and interpretable foundation for safe decision-making. Then, PST applies *Safety Reasoning Preference Optimization* to encourage the model to generate safe, helpful, and informative responses while reducing oversensitive and homogeneous characteristics. Extensive experiments demonstrate that PST significantly reduces harmful outputs across multiple multimodal safety benchmarks, while maintaining competitive performance on general tasks.

Computer Vision · Vision Models & Multimodal

Linjie Li, Mahtab Bigverdi, Jiawei Gu, Zixian Ma, Yinuo Yang, Ziang Li, Yejin Choi, Ranjay Krishna

Spatial cognition is essential for human intelligence, enabling problem-solving through visual simulations rather than relying solely on verbal reasoning. However, existing AI benchmarks primarily assess verbal reasoning, neglecting the complexities of non-verbal, multi-step visual simulation. We introduce STARE (Spatial Transformations and Reasoning Evaluation), a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal large language models on tasks better solved through multi-step visual simulation. STARE features ~4K tasks spanning foundational geometric transformations (2D and 3D), integrated spatial reasoning (cube net folding and tangram puzzles), and real-world spatial reasoning (perspective and temporal reasoning), reflecting practical cognitive challenges like object assembly, mechanical diagram interpretation, and everyday spatial navigation. Our evaluations show that models excel at reasoning over simpler 2D transformations, but perform close to random chance on more complex tasks like 3D cube net folding and tangram puzzles that require multi-step visual simulations. Humans achieve near-perfect accuracy but take considerable time (up to 28.0s) on complex tasks, reducing response time by 7.5 seconds on average with intermediate visual simulations. In contrast, models exhibit inconsistent performance gains from visual simulations, improving on most tasks but declining in specific cases like tangram puzzles (GPT-4o, o1) and cube net folding (Claude-3.5, Gemini-2.0 Flash), indicating that models cannot consistently leverage intermediate visual information. Even o3, a strong reasoning model, lags significantly behind human performance across tasks. By evaluating non-verbal visual reasoning beyond conventional text-based benchmarks, STARE highlights critical gaps in current AI spatial capabilities and sets a new standard for assessing spatial intelligence in multimodal models.

Deep Learning · Generative Models and Autoencoders

Miles Martinez, Alex Williams

This paper introduces *quasi-Monte Carlo latent variable models* (QLVMs): a class of deep generative models that are specialized for finding extremely low-dimensional and interpretable embeddings of high-dimensional datasets. Unlike standard approaches, which rely on a learned encoder and variational lower bounds, QLVMs directly approximate the marginal likelihood by randomized quasi-Monte Carlo integration. While this brute force approach has drawbacks in higher-dimensional spaces, we find that it excels in fitting one, two, and three dimensional deep latent variable models. Empirical results on a range of datasets show that QLVMs consistently outperform conventional variational autoencoders (VAEs) and importance weighted autoencoders (IWAEs) with matched latent dimensionality. The resulting embeddings enable transparent visualization and *post hoc* analyses such as nonparametric density estimation, clustering, and geodesic path computation, which are nontrivial to validate in higher-dimensional spaces. While our approach is compute-intensive and struggles to generate fine-scale details in complex datasets, it offers a compelling solution for applications prioritizing interpretability and latent space analysis.

Computer Vision · Image and Video Generation

Ahmed Bourouis, Mikhail Bessmeltsev, Yulia Gryaditskaya

Recent years have witnessed remarkable progress in generative AI, with natural language emerging as the most common conditioning input. As underlying models grow more powerful, researchers are exploring increasingly diverse conditioning signals -- such as depth maps, edge maps, camera parameters, and reference images -- to give users finer control over generation. Among different modalities, sketches constitute a natural and long-standing form of human communication, enabling rapid expression of visual concepts. Yet algorithms that effectively handle true freehand sketches -- with their inherent abstraction and distortions -- remain largely unexplored. In this work, we distinguish between edge maps, often regarded as “sketches” in the literature, and genuine freehand sketches. We pursue the challenging goal of balancing photorealism with sketch adherence when generating images from freehand input. A key obstacle is the absence of ground-truth, pixel-aligned images: by their nature, freehand sketches do not have a single correct alignment. To address this, we propose a modulation-based approach that prioritizes semantic interpretation of the sketch over strict adherence to individual edge positions. We further introduce a novel loss that enables training on freehand sketches without requiring ground-truth pixel-aligned images. We show that our method outperforms existing approaches in both semantic alignment with freehand sketch inputs and in the realism and overall quality of the generated images.

Theory · Interpretability and Visualization

Hang Chen, Jiaying Zhu, Xinyu Yang, Wenya Wang

The LLM unlearning aims to eliminate the influence of undesirable data without affecting causally unrelated information. This process typically involves using a **forget set** to remove target information, alongside a **retain set** to maintain non-target capabilities. While recent localization-based methods demonstrate promise in identifying important nodes (neurons) to be unlearned, they fail to disentangle nodes responsible for forgetting undesirable knowledge or retaining essential skills, often treating them as a single entangled group. As a result, these methods apply uniform interventions, risking catastrophic over-forgetting or incomplete erasure of the target knowledge. To address this, we turn to circuit discovery, a mechanistic interpretability technique, and propose the **C**onflict-guided **L**ocalization for LLM **U**nlearning fram**E**work (**CLUE**). This framework identifies the forget and retain circuit composed of important nodes, and then the circuits are transformed into conjunctive normal forms (CNF). The assignment of each node in the CNF satisfiability solution reveals whether it should be forgotten or retained. We then provide targeted fine-tuning strategies for different categories of nodes. Extensive experiments demonstrate that, compared to existing localization methods, CLUE achieves superior forget efficacy and retain utility through precise neural localization.

Computer Vision · Vision Models & Multimodal

Ziyue Wang, Sheng JIn, ZHONGRONG ZUO, Jiawei Wu, Han Qiu, Qi She, Hao Zhang, Jiang Xudong

Reinforcement learning (RL) has shown strong potential for enhancing reasoning in multimodal large language models (MLLMs), yet existing video reasoning methods often rely on coarse sequence-level rewards or single-factor token selection. Such approaches neglect fine-grained links among visual inputs, temporal dynamics, and linguistic outputs, limiting both accuracy and interpretability. We propose Video-KTR, a modality-aware policy shaping framework that performs selective, token-level RL by combining three attribution signals: (1) visual-aware tokens identified via counterfactual masking to reveal perceptual dependence; (2) temporal-aware tokens detected through frame shuffling to expose causal and temporal sensitivity; and (3) high-entropy tokens signaling predictive uncertainty. By reinforcing only the union of key tokens, Video-KTR focuses learning on semantically informative, modality-sensitive content while filtering out low-value tokens. Across five challenging benchmarks, Video-KTR achieves state-of-the-art or highly competitive results—42.7% on Video-Holmes, surpassing GPT-4o—with consistent gains on both reasoning-centric and general video understanding tasks. Ablation studies verify the complementary roles of the attribution signals and the robustness of targeted token-level updates. Overall, Video-KTR improves accuracy and interpretability, offering a simple, drop-in extension to RL for complex video reasoning.

Theory · Interpretability and Visualization

Tianxiang Dai, Jonathan Fan

Multi-Resolution Hash Encoding (MHE), the foundational technique behind Instant Neural Graphics Primitives, provides a powerful parameterization for neural fields. However, its spatial behavior lacks rigorous understanding from a physical systems perspective, leading to reliance on heuristics for hyperparameter selection. This work introduces a novel analytical approach that characterizes MHE by examining its Point Spread Function (PSF), which is analogous to the Green's function of the system. This methodology enables a quantification of the encoding's spatial resolution and fidelity. We derive a closed-form approximation for the collision-free PSF, uncovering inherent grid-induced anisotropy and a logarithmic spatial profile. We establish that the idealized spatial bandwidth, specifically the Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM), is determined by the average resolution, $N_{\text{avg}}$. This leads to a counterintuitive finding: the effective resolution of the model is governed by the broadened empirical FWHM (and therefore $N_{\text{avg}}$), rather than the finest resolution $N_{\max}$, a broadening effect we demonstrate arises from optimization dynamics. Furthermore, we analyze the impact of finite hash capacity, demonstrating how collisions introduce speckle noise and degrade the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). Leveraging these theoretical insights, we propose Rotated MHE (R-MHE), an architecture that applies distinct rotations to the input coordinates at each resolution level. R-MHE mitigates anisotropy while maintaining the efficiency and parameter count of the original MHE. This study establishes a methodology based on physical principles that moves beyond heuristics to characterize and optimize MHE.

Computer Vision · Vision Models & Multimodal

Weicheng Zheng, Xiaofei Mao, Nanfei Ye, Pengxiang Li, Kun Zhan, XianPeng Lang, Hang Zhao

The advent of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) has significantly advanced end-to-end autonomous driving, demonstrating powerful reasoning abilities for high-level behavior planning tasks. However, existing methods are often constrained by a passive perception paradigm, relying solely on text-based reasoning. This passivity restricts the model’s capacity to actively seek crucial visual evidence when faced with uncertainty. To address this, we introduce DriveAgent-R1, an autonomous driving agent capable of active perception for planning. In complex scenarios, DriveAgent-R1 proactively invokes tools to perform visual reasoning, firmly grounding its decisions in visual evidence, thereby enhancing both interpretability and reliability. Furthermore, we propose a hybrid thinking framework, inspired by human driver cognitive patterns, allowing the agent to adaptively switch between efficient text-only reasoning and robust tool-augmented visual reasoning based on scene complexity. This capability is cultivated through a three-stage progressive training strategy, featuring a core Cascaded Reinforcement Learning (Cascaded RL) phase. Extensive experiments on the Drive-Internal dataset, which is rich in long-tail scenarios, and the public nuScenes dataset show that, with only 3B parameters, DriveAgent-R1 achieves competitive performance comparable to top closed model systems such as GPT-5 and to human driving proficiency while remaining deployment-friendly, offering a proven path toward building more intelligent autonomous driving systems.

Jiaxuan Chen, Yu Qi, Yueming Wang, Gang Pan

The rapid progress of large vision-language models (VLMs), such as CLIP, has spurred the development of a wide range of neural decoding frameworks. Nevertheless, most existing approaches still suffer from semantic mismatches during representational alignment. This challenge may stem from the fact that the human brain does not distribute attention uniformly across a visual scene, but rather selectively encodes salient or relevant regions. Moreover, such selectivity is closely related to individual interests and varies from person to person. To address this challenge, we propose Yo'Mind, a novel optimal transport (OT)-driven personalized multimodal semantic masking framework designed to bridge the semantic gap between brain and machines in interpreting visual scenes. Technically, Yo'Mind introduces a dynamic semantic pruning and allocation mechanism that adaptively masks redundant visual semantic components in stimulus images based on individual neural responses—without requiring extra human supervision or hyperparameter tuning. This strategy can be used to enhance semantic consensus between brain and machine representations during decoding. Furthermore, the inherent flexibility of OT theory enables Yo'Mind to perform brain-visual-linguistic alignment and cross-subject decoding within a unified end-to-end architecture. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our Yo'Mind offers several advantages, including state-of-the-art brain-to-text reconstruction performance and improved interpretability of the decoding process.

Haonian Ji, Shi Qiu, Siyang Xin, Siwei Han, Zhaorun Chen, Dake Zhang, Hongyi Wang, Huaxiu Yao

While foundation models (FMs), such as diffusion models and large vision-language models (LVLMs), have been widely applied in educational contexts, their ability to generate pedagogically effective visual explanations remains limited. Most existing approaches focus primarily on textual reasoning, overlooking the critical role of structured and interpretable visualizations in supporting conceptual understanding. To better assess the visual reasoning capabilities of FMs in educational settings, we introduce EduVisBench, a multi-domain, multi-level benchmark. EduVisBench features diverse STEM problem sets requiring visually grounded solutions, along with a fine-grained evaluation rubric informed by pedagogical theory. Our empirical analysis reveals that existing models frequently struggle with the inherent challenge of decomposing complex reasoning and translating it into visual representations aligned with human cognitive processes. To address these limitations, we propose EduVisAgent, a multi-agent collaborative framework that coordinates specialized agents for instructional planning, reasoning decomposition, metacognitive prompting, and visualization design. Experimental results show that EduVisAgent substantially outperforms all baselines, achieving a 40.2% improvement and delivering more educationally aligned visualizations.

Thomas Fel, Binxu Wang, Michael Lepori, Matthew Kowal, Andrew Lee, Randall Balestriero, Sonia Joseph, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Talia Konkle, Demba Ba 等

DINOv2 sees the world well enough to guide robots and segment images, but we still do not know what it sees. We conduct the first comprehensive analysis of DINOv2’s representational structure using overcomplete dictionary learning, extracting over 32,000 visual concepts in what constitutes the largest interpretability demonstration for any vision foundation model to date. This method provides the backbone of our study, which unfolds in three parts. In the first part, we analyze how different downstream tasks recruit concepts from our learned dictionary, revealing functional specialization: classification exploits “Elsewhere” concepts that fire everywhere except on target objects, implementing learned negations; segmentation relies exclusively on boundary detectors forming coherent subspaces; depth estimation draws on three distinct monocular cue families matching visual neuroscience principles. Turning to concept geometry and statistics, we find the learned dictionary deviates from ideal near-orthogonal (Grassmannian) structure, exhibiting higher coherence than random baselines. Concept atoms are not aligned with the neuron basis, confirming distributed encoding. We discover antipodal concept pairs that encode opposite semantics (e.g., “white shirt” vs “black shirt”), creating signed semantic axes. Separately, we identify concepts that activate exclusively on register tokens, revealing these encode global scene properties like motion blur and illumination. Across layers, positional information collapses toward a 2D sheet, yet within single images token geometry remains smooth and clustered even after position is removed, putting into question a purely sparse-coding view of representation. To resolve this paradox, we advance a different view: tokens are formed by combining convex mixtures of a few archetypes (e.g., a rabbit among animals, brown among colors, fluffy among textures). Multi-head attention directly implements this construction, with activations behaving like sums of convex regions. In this picture, concepts are expressed by proximity to landmarks and by regions—not by unbounded linear directions. We call this the Minkowski Representation Hypothesis (MRH), and we examine its empirical signals and consequences for how we study, steer, and interpret vision-transformer representations.

Yanpeng Sun, Shan Zhang, Wei Tang, Aotian Chen, Piotr Koniusz, Kai Zou, Yuan Xue, Anton Hengel

Diagrams represent a form of visual language that encodes abstract concepts and relationships through structured symbols and their spatial arrangements. Unlike natural images, they are inherently symbolic, and entirely artificial. They thus pose unique challenges for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) distinct from natural image processing. Recent studies have shown that MLLMs often exhibit flawed reasoning and hallucinations when handling diagram inputs. We investigate here whether these limitations stem from shortcomings in the models' ability to interpret diagrams themselves. To this end, we develop a diagnostic test suite that isolates perception from reasoning. Our systematic evaluation reveals that MLLMs perform poorly on basic perceptual tasks, e.g., shape classification, object counting, relationship identification, and object grounding, with near-zero accuracy on fine-grained grounding. Further analysis shows that weak diagram perception leads to ``blind faith in text", where models rely on textual shortcuts rather than visual understanding (that is, they are $\textit{Math Blind}$). We hypothesize that enabling models to capture the inherent structural properties of diagrams, represented as graphs of primitives and their interrelationships, is essential for improving diagram understanding. Experiments with 7B and 32B MLLMs validate this assumption, with models trained on such representations achieving a +79\% gain on the grounding task. Crucially, these gains transfer to reasoning, achieving 3–4\% cross-suite improvements on four public benchmarks even without additional chain-of-thought reasoning data. Our findings demonstrate that low-level perception supports faithful high-level reasoning in mathematical MLLMs. We provide both methodological frameworks and empirical evidence to guide future research in this direction. Our project page is at \href{https://vi-ocean.github.io/projects/MATHEMETRIC/index.html}{\color{blue}{viocean/\ourMethod}}.

Jiayun Luo, Wan-Cyuan (Chris) Fan, Lyuyang Wang, Xiangteng He, Tanzila Rahman, Purang Abolmaesumi, Leonid Sigal

Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) have recently emerged as powerful architectures capable of understanding and reasoning over both visual and textual information. These models typically rely on two key components: a Vision Transformer (ViT) and a Large Language Model (LLM). ViT encodes visual content into a sequence of image tokens and serves as the perceptual front-end -- the eyes of the model. In contrast, the LLM interprets these tokens to perform high-level reasoning, generates responses, and functions as the cognitive core -- the brain of the model. However, it remains unclear which visual tokens contribute most significantly to understanding and reasoning, and how effectively these signals are propagated from ViT to the LLM. While most existing works have focused on identifying attention sinks, low-semantic tokens receiving disproportionately high attention, within the LLM, we shift the focus to the vision encoder by identifying a class of high-norm visual tokens from ViT, referred to as ViT attention sinks -- a problem that has been rarely studied but is indeed very important for LVLMs. Our findings show that these ViT sinks encapsulate high-level semantic concepts from images, allowing the LLM to perform more effective understanding and reasoning. Despite their importance, these sink tokens are often overlooked in existing LVLM architectures. To explore their contribution, we present both qualitative and quantitative analyses of the information embedded in these sink tokens. We also propose both training-free and training-based approaches to better leverage how this information is interpreted by the LLM, and to what extent. By explicitly utilizing these tokens, we demonstrate substantial improvements across a range of LVLMs and visual reasoning tasks, including but not limited to mathematical problem solving, logical inference, and geometric understanding, highlighting the untapped potential of ViT attention sinks in enhancing visual reasoning.

Theory · Interpretability and Visualization

Arnav Das, Gantavya Bhatt, Sahil Verma, Yiping Wang, Viswa Virinchi Muppirala, Jeff Bilmes

Data filtering plays a central role in improving model performance, particularly for vision language models that are pretrained on large, noisy, and redundant image-caption datasets. Existing filtering techniques assess every sample individually and retain those that exceed a certain quality threshold, but such strategies fail to capture higher-order interactions. In this work, we propose a novel submodular framework for data selection that addresses this limitation. Our method, Submodular Distribution Matching (SDM), selects a subset by: (1) training a type of sparse autoencoder to learn disentangled and \emph{monotone} features; (2) estimating a target feature distribution from a target dataset; and (3) selecting a subset of samples whose feature distribution closely matches the target via submodular maximization. Given the DataComp-medium training set and no external models, SDM achieves state-of-the-art accuracy on both ImageNet-1K and average performance across 38 downstream tasks. On the full DataComp-medium benchmark, SDM delivers performance within 1\% of the state-of-the-art results while using over \textbf{\emph{5×}} fewer GPU hours than the leading approach.

Theory · Interpretability and Visualization

Zunhai Su, Qingyuan Li, HaoZhang, Weihao Ye, Qibo Xue, Yulei Qian, Ngai Wong, Kehong Yuan

Leveraging the intrinsic importance differences among experts, recent research has explored expert-level compression techniques to enhance the efficiency of Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) large language models (LLMs). However, existing approaches often rely on empirical heuristics to identify critical experts, while lacking a deeper understanding into the heterogeneous importance of experts and the inner workings of MoE LLMs. In this study, we report, for the first time, the discovery and systematic investigation of a distinct subset of experts that play a pivotal role in the model's forward inference. These experts are prevalent in open-source MoE LLMs, and despite their extremely limited number, pruning them results in a substantial decline in model performance (e.g., prune just three out of 6,144 causes Qwen3-30B-A3B to generate repetitive and uninformative outputs). We refer to these experts as Super Experts (SEs). Our comprehensive analysis provides progressively deeper insights into SEs: (i) SEs are characterized by rare but extreme activation outliers in the output of the down\_proj, which give rise to massive activations in the hidden states between decoder layers. Moreover, the distribution of SEs is model-specific, data-agnostic, and remains unaffected by post-training processes. (ii) By pruning SEs, we assess their significance across a variety of tasks, revealing their considerable impact on the model's overall performance, particularly in mathematical reasoning. (iii) We further investigate why compressing SEs exerts such a pronounced impact. We show that, in MoE LLMs, SEs serve as the primary source of the systematic outlier mechanism in Transformers, and that compressing them profoundly disrupts this process, ultimately causing the collapse of attention sinks. These findings advance the understanding of the internal dynamics of MoE LLMs, filling an important gap in the current knowledge. In addition, we developed an automated tool for rapid and accurate SE profiling. The code is provided in the supplementary materials.

Theory · Interpretability and Visualization

Thomas Heap, Tim Lawson, Lucy Farnik, Laurence Aitchison

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are widely used to extract sparse, interpretable latents from transformer activations. We test whether commonly used SAE quality metrics and automatic explanation pipelines can distinguish trained transformers from randomly initialized ones (e.g., where parameters are sampled i.i.d. from a Gaussian). Over a wide range of Pythia model sizes and multiple randomization schemes, we find that, in many settings, SAEs trained on randomly initialized transformers produce auto-interpretability scores and reconstruction metrics that are similar to those from trained models. These results show that high aggregate auto-interpretability scores do not, by themselves, guarantee that learned, computationally relevant features have been recovered. We therefore recommend treating common SAE metrics as useful but insufficient proxies for mechanistic interpretability and argue for routine randomized baselines and targeted measures of feature 'abstractness'.

Computer Vision · Image and Video Generation

Tianyu Chen, Yasi Zhang, Zhi Zhang, Peiyu Yu, Shu Wang, Zhendong Wang, Kevin Lin, Xiaofei Wang, Zhengyuan Yang, Linjie Li 等

Instruction-based image editing has advanced rapidly, yet reliable and interpretable evaluation remains a bottleneck. Current protocols either (i) depend on paired reference images—resulting in limited coverage and inheriting biases from prior generative models—or (ii) rely *solely* on zero-shot vision–language models (VLMs), whose prompt-based assessments of instruction following, content consistency, and visual quality are often imprecise. To address this, we introduce **EdiVal-Agent** , an automated and fine-grained evaluation framework grounded in an object-centric perspective, designed to assess not only standard single-turn but also multi-turn instruction-based editing with precision. Given an input image, **EdiVal-Agent** first decomposes it into semantically meaningful objects, then synthesizes diverse, context-aware editing instructions while dynamically updating object pools across turns. These two stages enable two novel object-centric metrics tailored for multi-turn evaluation and one global metric of visual quality: 1) EdiVal-IF, which measures instruction following by combining open-vocabulary object detectors for symbolic checks with VLMs for semantic verification on detector-guided crops; 2) EdiVal-CC, which evaluates content consistency by calculating semantic similarity of unchanged objects and background using the evolving object pools; and 3) EdiVal-VQ, which quantifies changes in overall visual quality with human preference models. Instantiating this pipeline, we build **EdiVal-Bench**, a multi-turn editing benchmark covering 9 instruction types and 16 state-of-the-art editing models spanning in-context, flow-matching, and diffusion paradigms. Our results show that *Seedream 4.0* achieves the best overall performance, offering the strongest balance of instruction following, content consistency, and latency. *GPT-Image-1.5* clearly improves over *GPT-Image-1*, especially in content consistency across turns, while *Nano Banana 2* consistently outperforms *Nano Banana* in instruction following and overall score,. Among flow-matching models, *FLUX.2-max* is the strongest baseline, whereas *Qwen-Image-Edit* performs well on the first turn but degrades sharply in later turns, indicating strong exposure bias in multi-turn editing. We demonstrate that **EdiVal-Agent** can be used to identify existing failure modes, thereby informing the development of the next generation of editing models. Our code is available at https://github.com/TianyuCodings/EdiVal.

Applications · Everything Else

Jindong Li, Lianrong Chen, BIN YANG, Jiadong Zhu, Ying Wang, Yuzhe Ma, Menglin Yang

Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled impressive capabilities across diverse reasoning and generation tasks. However, their ability to understand and operate on real-world engineering problems, such as Printed Circuit Board (PCB) placement and routing, remains underexplored due to the lack of standardized benchmarks and high-fidelity datasets. To address this gap, we introduce PCB-Bench, the first comprehensive benchmark designed to systematically evaluate LLMs in the context of PCB design. PCB-Bench spans three complementary task settings: (1) text-based reasoning with approximately 3,700 expert-annotated instances, consisting of over 1,800 question-answer pairs and their corresponding choice question versions, covering component placement, routing strategies, and design rule compliance; (2) multimodal image-text reasoning with approximately 500 problems requiring joint interpretation of PCB visuals and technical specifications, including component identification, function recognition, and visual trace reasoning; (3) real-world design comprehension using over 170 complete PCB projects with schematics, placement files, and design documentation. We design structured evaluation protocols to assess both generative and discriminative capabilities, and conduct extensive comparisons across state-of-the-art LLMs. Our results reveal substantial gaps in current models’ ability to reason over spatial placements, follow domain-specific constraints, and interpret professional engineering artifacts. PCB-Bench establishes a foundational resource for advancing research toward more capable engineering AI, with implications extending beyond PCB design to broader structured reasoning domains. Data and code are available at https://github.com/digailab/PCB-Bench.

Applications · Neuroscience, Cognitive Science

Rabia Gondur, Patricia Stan, Matthew A Smith, Benjamin Cowley

An ongoing quest in neuroscience is to find the preferred stimulus of a sensory neuron. This search lays the foundation for understanding how selectivity emerges in the primate visual stream---from simple edge-detecting neurons to highly-selective face neurons---as well as for the architectures and activation functions of deep neural networks. The prevailing notion is that a visual neuron primarily responds to a single preferred visual feature, like an oriented edge or the shape of an object, resulting in a 'one-tailed' distribution of responses to natural images. However, surprisingly, we instead find 'two-tailed' response distributions of primate visual cortical neurons, suggesting that these neurons have both preferred and anti-preferred stimuli. We experimentally validated anti-preferred stimuli by recording responses from macaque V4 to model-optimized stimuli. We find that these anti-preferred stimuli are important for describing a neuron's tuning, as both preferred and anti-preferred images are needed to predict a neuron's responses to natural images. Moreover, in a psychophysics task, humans rely on anti-preferred images to interpret and predict V4 stimulus tuning; this was not the case for internal units from a deep neural network. Interestingly, we find no discernible differences in image statistics between preferred and anti-preferred images. This suggests that by encoding anti-preferred features, a V4 population seemingly doubles its capacity for feature selectivity, allowing for a more flexible downstream readout. Overall, we establish anti-preferred stimuli as an important encoding property of V4 neurons. Our work embarks on a new quest in neuroscience to search for anti-preferred stimuli along the visual stream and offers a new perspective on how feature selectivity arises in the visual cortex and deep neural networks.