论文检索

Social Aspects · Fairness, Equity, Justice and Safety

Ziheng Cheng, Yixiao Huang, Hui Xu, Somayeh Sojoudi, Xuandong Zhao, Dawn Song, Song Mei

Text-to-Image (T2I) models have achieved remarkable success in generating visual content from text inputs. Although multiple safety alignment strategies have been proposed to prevent harmful outputs, they often lead to overly cautious behavior---rejecting even benign prompts---a phenomenon known as \textit{over-refusal} that reduces the practical utility of T2I models. Despite over-refusal having been observed in practice, there is no large-scale benchmark that systematically evaluates this phenomenon for T2I models. In this paper, we present an automatic workflow to construct synthetic evaluation data, resulting in OVERT (\textbf{OVE}r-\textbf{R}efusal evaluation on \textbf{T}ext-to-image models), the first large-scale benchmark for assessing over-refusal behaviors in T2I models. OVERT includes 4,600 seemingly harmful but benign prompts across nine safety-related categories, along with 1,785 genuinely harmful prompts (OVERT-unsafe) to evaluate the safety–utility trade-off. Using OVERT, we evaluate several leading T2I models and find that over-refusal is a widespread issue across various categories (Figure 1), underscoring the need for further research to enhance the safety alignment of T2I models without compromising their functionality. As a preliminary attempt to reduce over-refusal, we explore prompt rewriting; however, we find it often compromises faithfulness to the meaning of the original prompts.Finally, we demonstrate the flexibility of our generation framework in accommodating diverse safety requirements by generating customized evaluation data adapting to user-defined policies.

Computer Vision · Vision Models & Multimodal

Gorjan Radevski, Teodora Popordanoska, Matthew Blaschko, Tinne Tuytelaars

Audio-visual understanding is a rapidly evolving field that seeks to integrate and interpret information from both auditory and visual modalities. Despite recent advances in multi-modal learning, existing benchmarks often suffer from strong visual bias -- when answers can be inferred from visual data alone -- and provide only aggregate scores that conflate multiple sources of error. This makes it difficult to determine whether models struggle with visual understanding, audio interpretation, or audio-visual alignment. In this work, we introduce DAVE: Diagnostic Audio Visual Evaluation, a novel benchmark dataset designed to systematically evaluate audio-visual models across controlled settings. DAVE alleviates existing limitations by (i) ensuring both modalities are necessary to answer correctly and (ii) decoupling evaluation into atomic subcategories. Our detailed analysis of state-of-the-art models reveals specific failure modes and provides targeted insights for improvement. By offering this standardized diagnostic framework, we aim to facilitate more robust development of audio-visual models.Dataset: https://huggingface.co/datasets/gorjanradevski/daveCode: https://github.com/gorjanradevski/dave

Computer Vision · Vision Models & Multimodal

Ryo Umagami, Liu Yue, Xuangeng Chu, Ryuto Fukushima, Tetsuya Narita, Yusuke Mukuta, Tomoyuki Takahata, Jianfei Yang, Tatsuya Harada

Human motion is inherently intentional, yet most motion modeling paradigms focus on low-level kinematics, overlooking the semantic and causal factors that drive behavior. Existing datasets further limit progress: they capture short, decontextualized actions in static scenes, providing little grounding for embodied reasoning. To address these limitations, we introduce $\textit{Intend to Move (I2M)}$, a large-scale, multimodal dataset for intention-grounded motion modeling. I2M contains 10.1 hours of two-person 3D motion sequences recorded in dynamic realistic home environments, accompanied by multi-view RGB-D video, 3D scene geometry, and language annotations of each participant’s evolving intentions. Benchmark experiments reveal a fundamental gap in current motion models: they fail to translate high-level goals into physically and socially coherent motion. I2M thus serves not only as a dataset but as a benchmark for embodied intelligence, enabling research on models that can reason about, predict, and act upon the ``why'' behind human motion.

Deep Learning · Everything Else

Myeongsoo Kim, Shweta Garg, Baishakhi Ray, Varun Kumar, Anoop Deoras

Programming assistants powered by large language models have transformed software development, yet most benchmarks focus narrowly on code generation tasks. Recent efforts like InfiBench and StackEval attempt to address this gap using Stack Overflow data but remain limited to single-turn interactions in isolated contexts, require significant manual curation, and fail to represent complete project environments. We introduce CodeAssistBench (CAB), the first benchmark framework for evaluating multi-turn programming assistance in realistic settings that address questions grounded in actual codebases. Unlike existing programming Q&A benchmarks, CAB automatically generates scalable datasets from GitHub issues tagged with questions using configurable parameters (e.g., repository creation date, star count, programming languages), and includes automatic containerization of codebases for evaluation. It then evaluates models through simulated users in these containerized environments with full codebase access. Using this framework, we constructed a test set of 3,286 real-world programming questions across 214 repositories, spanning seven programming languages and diverse problem domains. Our evaluation of leading LLMs reveals a substantial capability gap: while models perform well on Stack Overflow questions with success rates of 70-83%, they resolve only up to 16.49% of CAB's issues from recent repositories (post-training cutoff). This discrepancy highlights the challenges of providing assistance in complex, project-specific contexts versus answering standalone questions. Our fully automated framework enables continuous benchmark expansion and is available at https://github.com/amazon-science/CodeAssistBench/.

Computer Vision · 3D Rendering & Reconstruction

Weipeng Zhong, Peizhou Cao, Yichen Jin, Luo Li, Wenzhe Cai, Jingli Lin, Hanqing Wang, Zhaoyang Lyu, Tai WANG, Xudong XU 等

The advancement of Embodied AI heavily relies on large-scale, simulatable 3D scene datasets characterized by scene diversity and realistic layouts.However, existing datasets typically suffer from limitations in data scale or diversity, sanitized layouts lacking small items, and severe object collisions.To address these shortcomings, we introduce \textbf{InternScenes}, a novel large-scale simulatable indoor scene dataset comprising approximately 40,000 diverse scenes by integrating three disparate scene sources, \ie, real-world scans, procedurally generated scenes, and designer-created scenes, including 1.96M 3D objects and covering 15 common scene types and 288 object classes.We particularly preserve massive small items in the scenes, resulting in realistic and complex layouts with an average of 41.5 objects per region.Our comprehensive data processing pipeline ensures simulatability by creating real-to-sim replicas for real-world scans, enhances interactivity by incorporating interactive objects into these scenes, and resolves object collisions by physical simulations.We demonstrate the value of InternScenes with two benchmark applications: scene layout generation and point-goal navigation. Both show the new challenges posed by the complex and realistic layouts. More importantly, InternScenes paves the way for scaling up the model training for both tasks, making the generation and navigation in such complex scenes possible. We commit to open-sourcing the data and benchmarks to benefit the whole community.

Reinforcement Learning · Everything Else

Reginald McLean, Evangelos Chatzaroulas, Luc McCutcheon, Frank Röder, Tianhe Yu, Zhanpeng He, K.R. Zentner, Ryan Julian, J Terry, Isaac Woungang 等

Meta-World is widely used for evaluating multi-task and meta-reinforcement learning agents, which are challenged to master diverse skills simultaneously. Since its introduction however, there have been numerous undocumented changes which inhibit a fair comparison of algorithms. This work strives to disambiguate these results from the literature, while also leveraging the past versions of Meta-World to provide insights into multi-task and meta-reinforcement learning benchmark design. Through this process we release an open-source version of Meta-World that has full reproducibility of past results, is more technically ergonomic, and gives users more control over the tasks that are included in a task set.

Social Aspects · Privacy-preserving Statistics and Machine Learning

Fan Mo, Bo Liu, Yuan Fan, Kun Qin, Yizhou Zhao, Jinhe Zhou, Jia Sun, Jinfei Liu, Kui Ren

With the rapid development of artificial intelligence technologies, the demand for training data has surged, exacerbating risks of data leakage. Despite increasing incidents and costs associated with such leaks, data leakage prevention (DLP) technologies lag behind evolving evasion techniques that bypass existing sensitive information recognition (SIR) models. Current datasets lack comprehensive coverage of these adversarial transformations, limiting the evaluation of robust SIR systems. To address this gap, we introduce DataSIR, a benchmark dataset specifically designed to evaluate SIR models on sensitive data subjected to diverse format transformations. We curate 26 sensitive data categories based on multiple international regulations, and collect 131,890 original samples correspondingly. Through empirical analysis of real-world evasion tactics, we implement 21 format transformation methods, which are applied to the original samples, expanding the dataset to 1,647,501 samples to simulate adversarial scenarios. We evaluated DataSIR using four traditional NLP models and four large language models (LLMs). For LLMs, we design structured prompts with varying degrees of contextual hints to assess the impact of prior knowledge on recognition accuracy. These evaluations demonstrate that our dataset effectively differentiates the performance of various SIR algorithms. Combined with its rich category and format diversity, the dataset can serve as a benchmark for evaluating related models and help develop future more advanced SIR models. Our dataset and experimental code are publicly available at https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/fanmo1/datasir and https://github.com/Fan-Mo-ZJU/DataSIR.

Applications · Health

Daeun Kyung, Hyunseung Chung, Seongsu Bae, Jiho Kim, Jae Ho Sohn, Taerim Kim, Soo Kyung Kim, Edward Choi

Doctor-patient consultations require multi-turn, context-aware communication tailored to diverse patient personas. Training or evaluating doctor LLMs in such settings requires realistic patient interaction systems. However, existing simulators often fail to reflect the full range of personas seen in clinical practice. To address this, we introduce PatientSim, a patient simulator that generates realistic and diverse patient personas for clinical scenarios, grounded in medical expertise. PatientSim operates using: 1) clinical profiles, including symptoms and medical history, derived from real-world data in the MIMIC-ED and MIMIC-IV datasets, and 2) personas defined by four axes: personality, language proficiency, medical history recall level, and cognitive confusion level, resulting in 37 unique combinations.We evaluate eight LLMs for factual accuracy and persona consistency. The top-performing open-source model, Llama 3.3 70B, is validated by four clinicians to confirm the robustness of our framework. As an open-source, customizable platform, PatientSim provides a reproducible and scalable solution that can be customized for specific training needs. Offering a privacy-compliant environment, it serves as a robust testbed for evaluating medical dialogue systems across diverse patient presentations and shows promise as an educational tool for healthcare. The code is available at https://github.com/dek924/PatientSim.

Optimization · Large Scale, Parallel and Distributed

Steven Kolawole, Keshav Santhanam, Virginia Smith, Pratiksha Thaker

LLM serving systems typically treat user prompts as monolithic inputs, optimizing inference through decoding tricks or inter-query batching. However, many real-world prompts contain *latent semantic parallelism*—decomposable structures where subtasks can be executed independently to reduce latency while preserving meaning.We introduce PARALLELPROMPT, the first benchmark for measuring intra-query parallelism in natural user prompts. Our dataset comprises over 37,000 real-world prompts from public LLM chat logs, each annotated with a structured schema capturing task templates, shared context, and iteration inputs. These schemas are extracted using LLM-assisted prompting with rule-based multilingual validation.To evaluate the benefits of decomposition, we provide an execution suite that benchmarks serial vs. parallel strategies, measuring latency, structural adherence, and semantic fidelity. Our results show that intra-query parallelism can be successfully parsed in over 75\% of curated datasets, unlocking up to *$5\times$ speedups* on tasks like translation, comprehension, and comparative analysis, with minimal quality degradation.By releasing this benchmark, curation pipeline, and evaluation suite, we provide the first standardized testbed for studying structure-aware execution in LLM serving pipelines.

Social Aspects · Trustworthy Machine Learning

Khaoula Chehbouni, Mohammed Haddou, Jackie CK Cheung, Golnoosh Farnadi

Evaluating natural language generation (NLG) systems remains a core challenge, further complicated by the rise of general-purpose large language models (LLMs). Recently, large language models as judges (LLJs) have emerged as a scalable, cost-effective alternative to traditional metrics, but their validity remains underexplored. This position paper argues that the current enthusiasm around LLJs may be premature, as their adoption has outpaced rigorous scrutiny of their reliability and validity as evaluators. Drawing on measurement theory from the social sciences, we identify and critically assess four core assumptions underlying the use of LLJs: their ability to act as proxies for human judgment, their capabilities as evaluators, their scalability, and their cost-effectiveness. We examine how each of these assumptions may be challenged by the inherent limitations of LLMs, LLJs, or current practices in NLG evaluation. To ground our analysis, we explore three applications of LLJs at various stages of the machine learning pipeline: text summarization, data annotation and safety alignment. Finally, we highlight the need for more responsible evaluation practices in LLJs evaluation, to ensure that their growing role in the field supports, rather than undermines, progress in NLG.

Social Aspects · Fairness, Equity, Justice and Safety

Devan Walton, Haesol Bae

The increasing societal integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) and agent-based AI demands a new civic competency: adversarial reasoning. This position paper argues that K-12 AI education must move beyond passive literacy to actively equip students with skills in responsible adversarial prompting and ethical system "hacking." Such capabilities are essential for citizens to critically probe AI systems, understand their inherent limitations, identify manipulative patterns, and hold them accountable. We posit that cultivating a generation skilled in "red-teaming" AI is vital for maintaining transparency, preventing undue influence, and fostering a democratic engagement with these transformative technologies.

Social Aspects

Mary Cummings

This position paper argues that the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) to control, direct, guide or govern any weapon, either in situ or remotely, should be prohibited by government agencies and non-governmental organizations. Such a moratorium should exist until hallucinations can be successfully modeled and predicted. Generative AI is inherently unreliable and not appropriate in environments that could result in the loss of life.

Social Aspects · Accountability, Transparency and Interpretability

Riley Simmons-Edler, Jean Dong, Paul Lushenko, Kanaka Rajan, Ryan Badman

Military weapon systems and command-and-control infrastructure augmented by artificial intelligence (AI) have seen rapid development and deployment in recent years. However, the sociotechnical impacts of AI on combat systems, military decision-making, and the norms of warfare have been understudied. We focus on a specific subset of lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS) that use AI for targeting or battlefield decisions. We refer to this subset as AI-powered lethal autonomous weapon systems (AI-LAWS) and argue that they introduce novel risks—including unanticipated escalation, poor reliability in unfamiliar environments, and erosion of human oversight—all of which threaten both military effectiveness and the openness of AI research.These risks cannot be addressed by high-level policy alone; effective regulation must be grounded in the technical behavior of AI models. We argue that AI researchers must be involved throughout the regulatory lifecycle.Thus, we propose a clear, behavior-based definition of AI-LAWS—systems that introduce unique risks through their use of modern AI—as a foundation for technically grounded regulation, given that existing frameworks do not distinguish them from conventional LAWS.Using this definition, we propose several technically-informed policy directions and invite greater participation from the AI research community in military AI policy discussions.

General Machine Learning · Everything Else

Elizaveta Semenova, Siobhan Mackenzie Hall, Timothy James Hitge, Alisa Sheinkman, Jon Cockayne

Surrogate models are widely used to approximate complex systems across science and engineering to reduce computational costs. Despite their widespread adoption, the field lacks standardisation across key stages of the modelling pipeline, including data sampling, model selection, evaluation, and downstream analysis. This fragmentation limits reproducibility and cross-domain utility – a challengefurther exacerbated by the rapid proliferation of AI-driven surrogate models. We argue for the urgent need to establish a structured reporting standard, the Surrogate Model Reporting Standard (SMRS), that systematically captures essential design and evaluation choices while remaining agnostic to implementation specifics. By promoting a standardised yet flexible framework, we aim to improve the reliabilityof surrogate modelling, foster interdisciplinary knowledge transfer, and, as a result, accelerate scientific progress in the AI era.

Social Aspects

Alexandra Olteanu, Su Lin Blodgett, Agathe Balayn, Angelina Wang, Fernando Diaz, Flavio Calmon, Margaret Mitchell, Michael Ekstrand, Reuben Binns, Solon Barocas

In AI research and practice, rigor remains largely understood in terms of methodological rigor---such as whether mathematical, statistical, or computational methods are correctly applied. We argue that this narrow conception of rigor has contributed to the concerns raised by the responsible AI community, including overblown claims about the capabilities of AI systems. Our position is that a broader conception of what rigorous AI research and practice should entail is needed. We believe such a conception---in addition to a more expansive understanding of 1) methodological rigor---should include aspects related to 2) what background knowledge informs what to work on (epistemic rigor); 3) how disciplinary, community, or personal norms, standards, or beliefs influence the work (normative rigor); 4) how clearly articulated the theoretical constructs under use are (conceptual rigor); 5) what is reported and how (reporting rigor); and 6) how well-supported the inferences from existing evidence are (interpretative rigor). In doing so, we also provide useful language and a framework for much needed dialogue about the AI community's work by researchers, policymakers, journalists, and other stakeholders.

Social Aspects · Fairness, Equity, Justice and Safety

Nicholas Vincent, Matt Prewitt, Hanlin Li

This position paper argues that there is an urgent need to restructure markets for the information that goes into AI systems. Specifically, small-to-medium sized producers of information (such as journalists, news organizations, researchers, and creative professionals) need to be able to appoint representatives who can carry out "collective bargaining" with AI product builders in order to receive a reasonable terms and a fair return on the informational value they contribute. Obstacles to this market structure can be removed through technical work that facilitates collective bargaining in the information economy (e.g., explainable data value estimation and federated data management tools) and regulatory/policy interventions (e.g., support for trusted data intermediary organizations that represent guilds or syndicates of information producers). We argue that without collective bargaining in the information economy, AI will exacerbate a large-scale "information market failure" that will lead not only to undesirable concentration of capital, but also to a potential "ecological collapse" in the informational commons. On the other hand, collective bargaining in the information economy can create market conditions necessary for a pro-social AI future. We provide concrete actions that can be taken to support a coalition-based approach to achieve this.

Hua Shen, Tiffany Knearem, Reshmi Ghosh, Kenan Alkiek, Kundan Krishna, Liu Yachuan, Savvas Petridis, Yi-Hao Peng, Li Qiwei, Chenglei Si 等

Recent advances in general-purpose AI underscore the urgent need to align AI systems with human goals and values. Yet, the lack of a clear, shared understanding of what constitutes "alignment" limits meaningful progress and cross-disciplinary collaboration. In this position paper, we argue that the research community should explicitly define and critically reflect on "alignment" to account for the bidirectional and dynamic relationship between humans and AI. Through a systematic review of over 400 papers spanning HCI, NLP, ML, and more, we examine how alignment is currently defined and operationalized. Building on this analysis, we introduce the Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment framework, which not only incorporates traditional efforts to align AI with human values but also introduces the critical, underexplored dimension of aligning humans with AI – supporting cognitive, behavioral, and societal adaptation to rapidly advancing AI technologies. Our findings reveal significant gaps in current literature, especially in long-term interaction design, human value modeling, and mutual understanding. We conclude with three central challenges and actionable recommendations to guide future research toward more nuanced, reciprocal, and human-AI alignment approaches.

Social Aspects · Trustworthy Machine Learning

Josu Eguíluz, Axel Brando, Migle Laukyte, Marc Serra-Vidal

Artificial intelligence (AI) now permeates critical infrastructures and decisionmaking systems where failures produce social, economic, and democratic harm. This position paper challenges the entrenched belief that regulation and innovation are opposites. As evidenced by analogies from aviation, pharmaceuticals, and welfare systems and recent cases of synthetic misinformation, bias and unaccountable decision-making, the absence of well-designed regulation has already created immeasurable damage. Regulation, when thoughtful and adaptive, is not a brake on innovation—it is its foundation. The present position paper examines the EU AI Act as a model of risk-based, responsibility-driven regulation that addresses the Collingridge Dilemma: acting early enough to prevent harm, yet flexibly enough to sustain innovation. Its adaptive mechanisms—regulatory sandboxes, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) support, real-world testing, fundamental rights impact assessment (FRIA)—demonstrate how regulation can accelerate responsibly, rather than delay, technological progress. The position paper summarises how governance tools transform perceived burdens into tangible advantages: legal certainty, consumer trust, and ethical competitiveness. Ultimately, the paper reframes progress: innovation and regulation advance together. By embedding transparency, impact assessments, accountability, and AI literacy into design and deployment, the EU framework defines what responsible innovation truly means—technological ambition disciplined by democratic values and fundamental rights.

Theory · Game Theory

Vojta Kovarik, Eric Chen, Sami Petersen, Alexis Ghersengorin, Vincent Conitzer

This position paper argues for two claims regarding AI testing and evaluation. First, to remain informative about deployment behaviour, evaluations need account for the possibility that AI systems understand their circumstances and reason strategically. Second, game-theoretic analysis can inform evaluation design by formalising and scrutinising the reasoning in evaluation-based safety cases. Drawing on examples from existing AI systems, a review of relevant research, and formal strategic analysis of a stylised evaluation scenario, we present evidence for these claims and motivate several research directions.

Applications

Julien Martinelli

Physics-Informed Machine Learning (PIML) has successfully integrated mechanistic understanding into machine learning, particularly in domains governed by well-known physical laws.This success has motivated efforts to apply PIML to biology, a field rich in dynamical systems but shaped by different constraints.Biological modeling, however, presents unique challenges: multi-faceted and uncertain prior knowledge, heterogeneous and noisy data, partial observability, and complex, high-dimensional networks.\textbf{In this position paper, we argue that these challenges should not be seen as obstacles to PIML, but as catalysts for its evolution. We propose Biology-Informed Machine Learning (BIML): a principled extension of PIML that retains its structural grounding while adapting to the practical realities of biology.}Rather than replacing PIML, BIML retools its methods to operate under softer, probabilistic forms of prior knowledge.We outline four foundational pillars as a roadmap for this transition: uncertainty quantification, contextualization, constrained latent structure inference, and scalability.Foundation Models and Large Language Models will be key enablers, bridging human expertise with computational modeling.We conclude with concrete recommendations to build the BIML ecosystem and channel PIML-inspired innovation toward challenges of high scientific and societal relevance.