论文检索

Maolei Huang, Zhuangzhuoran, Detao Lv, YuanTong Li, Shuhan Song, Yao Yu

Over recent decades, the tourism industry has demonstrated progressive expansion, driven by advancements in aviation technologies and shifting consumer interests. In this context, online flight itinerary ranking has become a pivotal business for Online Travel Platforms (OTPs), which aim to rank flight itineraries by synthesizing real-time flight data provided by airlines with users' individual travel preferences. Currently, most OTPs rely on rule-based methodologies or rudimentary user preference-driven models to address this task. However, these methods are inherently limited by their insufficient consideration of delayed booking behaviors and their neglect of dynamic contextual attributes associated with flight itineraries, thereby undermining their ability to effectively handle the intricacies of flight ranking. To address these shortcomings, this paper introduces the Delayed Conversion Modeling based Personalized Flight Itinerary Ranking Network (DCRNet), designed to improve ranking accuracy by integrating delayed booking patterns and contextual dependencies into the modeling framework. Specifically, DCRNet explores the dynamic associations between users' current contextual information and their historical travel records, and models users' delayed booking behaviors via a masked attention mechanism. Moreover, an enhanced multi-task learning framework is employed to effectively integrate traditional behavioral modeling with delay-aware modeling, thereby improving the overall prediction accuracy and enhancing the system's personalized recommendation capabilities. Extensive offline experiments conducted on real-world datasets from Amadeus and Fliggy demonstrate the superior performance of DCRNet. Furthermore, its successful deployment on Fliggy's online itinerary search system has yielded significant improvements, underscoring its practical effectiveness and scalability.

Azza Fadhel, Nathaniel W. Zuckschwerdt, Aryan Deshwal, Susmita Bose, Amit Bandyopadhyay, Jana Doppa

Configuring the parameters of additive manufacturing processes for metal alloys is a challenging problem due to complex relationships between input parameters (e.g., laser power, scan speed) and quality of printed outputs. The standard trial-and-error approach to find feasible parameter configurations is highly inefficient because validating each configuration is expensive in terms of resources (physical and human labor) and the configuration space is very large. This paper combines the general principles of AI-driven adaptive experimental design with domain knowledge to address the challenging problem of discovering feasible configurations. The key idea is to build a surrogate model from past experiments to intelligently select a small batch of input configurations for validation in each iteration. To demonstrate the effectiveness of this methodology, we deploy it for Directed Energy Deposition process to print GRCop-42, a high-performance copper–chromium–niobium alloy developed by NASA for aerospace applications. Within three months, our approach yielded multiple defect-free outputs across a range of laser powers—dramatically reducing time-to-result and resource expenditure compared to several months of manual experimentation by domain scientists with no success. By enabling high-quality GRCop-42 fabrication on readily available infrared laser platforms for the first time, we democratize access to this critical alloy, paving the way for cost-effective, decentralized production for aerospace applications.

Rahul Bordoloi, Clémence Réda, Orell Trautmann, Saptarshi Bej, Olaf Wolkenhauer

The more extensive access to time-series data, especially for biomedical purposes, raises new methodological challenges, particularly regarding missing values. Functional linear discriminant analysis (FLDA) extends Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA)-mediated multiclass classification and dimension reduction to data in the form of fragmented observations of a univariate function. For large multivariate and partially-observed data, there are two challenges: (i) statistical dependencies between different components of a multivariate function and (ii) heterogeneous sampling times with missing features. We here develop a multivariate version of FLDA, called MUDRA, to tackle these challenges and describe a computationally efficient expectation/conditional-maximisation (ECM) algorithm to infer its parameters without any tensor inversions. We assess its predictive power on the “Articulary Words” dataset and show its improvement over the state-of-the-art, especially in the case of missing data. This advancement in dimension reduction of multivariate functional data holds promise for enhancing classification accuracy in scenarios like partially observed short multivariate time series analysis.

Anupama Sitaraman, Bharathan Balaji, Yuvraj Agarwal

Investigating the effects of climate change and global warming caused by GHG emissions have been a key concern worldwide. These emissions are largely contributed to by the production, use and disposal of consumer products. Thus, it is important to build tools to estimate the environmental impact of consumer goods, an essential part of which is conducting Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs). LCAs specify and account for the appropriate processes involved with the production, use, and disposal of the products. We present SpiderGen, an LLM-based workflow which integrates the taxonomy and methodology of traditional LCA with the reasoning capabilities and world knowledge of LLMs to generate graphical representations of the key procedural information used for LCA, known as Product Category Rules Process Flow Graphs (PCR PFGs). We additionally evaluate the output of SpiderGen by comparing it with 65 real-world LCA documents. We find that SpiderGen provides accurate LCA process information that is either fully correct or has minor errors, achieving an F1-Score of 65% across 10 sample data points, as compared to 53% using a one-shot prompting method. We observe that the remaining errors occur primarily due to differences in detail between LCA documents, as well as differences in the ``scope" of which auxiliary processes must also be included. We also demonstrate that SpiderGen performs better than several baselines techniques, such as chain-of-thought prompting and one-shot prompting. Finally, we highlight SpiderGen's potential to reduce the human effort and costs for estimating carbon impact, as it is able to produce LCA process information for less than $1 USD in under 10 minutes as compared to the status quo LCA, which can cost over $25000 USD and take up to 21-person days.

Jianrong Lu, Junwei Liu, Xingyun Zheng, Minghui Yang, Jian Wang, Ping Wang, Yechao Zhang

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into clinical applications presents transformative potential but is undermined by the critical risk of hallucination, the generation of plausible but factually incorrect information. Such failures pose a direct threat to patient safety and the integrity of clinical decision-making. To address this challenge, we introduce MHB, a novel and comprehensive benchmark framework designed to evaluate LLM reliability in two complex, high-stakes clinical contexts: multi-turn medical dialogues and clinical case report analysis. The core of our contribution is a systematic methodology for generating adversarial test cases by injecting ``hallucination traps" into realistic medical data, guided by a fine-grained taxonomy of clinical errors. MHB, comprising 4,695 samples and 20,288 evaluation rubrics, underwent a rigorous, two-stage validation by a panel of 60 licensed physicians from top-tier hospitals, ensuring high clinical realism and consistency. This comprehensive assessment of leading LLMs revealed significant, clinically relevant shortcomings across the board. Even the best-performing model, Claude-4-Sonnet, exhibited a hallucination rate of 29.1%, with some open-source models exceeding 57.0%. All models struggled with specific traps, like fabricated medical data or non-existent guidelines, highlighting prevalent systemic weaknesses.

Deuksin Kwon, Kaleen Shrestha, Bin Han, Spencer Lin, James Hale, Jonathan Gratch, Maja Mataric, Gale M. Lucas

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate human behavior in social settings such as legal mediation, negotiation, and dispute resolution. However, it remains unclear whether these simulations reproduce the personality–behavior patterns observed in humans. Human personality, for instance, shapes how individuals navigate social interactions, including strategic choices and behaviors in emotionally charged interactions. This raises the question: Can LLMs, when prompted with personality traits, reproduce personality-driven differences in human conflict behavior? To explore this, we introduce an evaluation framework that enables direct comparison of human-human and LLM-LLM behaviors in dispute resolution dialogues with respect to Big Five Inventory (BFI) personality traits. This framework provides a set of interpretable metrics related to strategic behavior and conflict outcomes. We additionally contribute a novel dataset creation methodology for LLM dispute resolution dialogues with matched scenarios and personality traits with respect to human conversations. Finally, we demonstrate the use of our evaluation framework with three contemporary closed-source LLMs and show significant divergences in how personality manifests in conflict across different LLMs compared to human data, challenging the assumption that personality-prompted agents can serve as reliable behavioral proxies in socially impactful applications. Our work highlights the need for psychological grounding and validation in AI simulations before real-world use.

Ming Gu, Ziwei Wang, Sicen Lai, Zirui Gao, Sheng Zhou, Jiajun Bu

Ensuring web accessibility is crucial for advancing social welfare, justice, and equality in digital spaces, yet the vast majority of website user interfaces remain non-compliant, due in part to the resource-intensive and unscalable nature of current auditing practices. While WCAG-EM offers a structured methodology for site-wise conformance evaluation, it involves great human efforts and lacks practical support for execution at scale. In this work, we present an auditing framework, AAA, which operationalizes WCAG-EM through a human-AI partnership model. AAA is anchored by two key innovations: GRASP, a graph-based multimodal sampling method that ensures representative page coverage via learned embeddings of visual, textual, and relational cues; and MaC, a multimodal large language model-based copilot strategy that supports auditors through cross-modal reasoning and intelligent assistance in high-effort tasks. Together, these components enable scalable, end-to-end web accessibility auditing, empowering human auditors with AI-enhanced assistance for real-world impact. We further contribute four novel datasets designed for benchmarking core stages of the audit pipeline. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods, providing insights that small-scale language models can serve as capable experts when fine-tuned.

Marc Grimson, Joshua Fan, Courtney L. Davis, Dylan Van Bramer, Daniel Fink, Carla P. Gomes

Global biodiversity loss is accelerating, prompting international efforts such as the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals to direct resources toward halting species declines. A key challenge in achieving this goal is having access to robust methodologies to understand where species occur and how they relate to each other within broader ecological communities. Recent deep learning-based advances in joint species distribution modeling have shown improved predictive performance, but effectively incorporating community-level learning, taking into account species-species relationships in addition to species-environment relationships, remains an outstanding challenge. We introduce LabelKAN, a novel framework based on Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) to learn inter-label connections from predictions of each label. When modeling avian species distributions, LabelKAN achieves substantial gains in predictive performance across the vast majority of species. In particular, our method demonstrates strong improvements for rare and difficult-to-predict species, which are often the most important when setting biodiversity targets under frameworks like GBF. These performance gains also translate to more confident predictions of the species spatial patterns as well as more confident predictions of community structure. We illustrate how the LabelKAN leads to qualitative and quantitative improvements with a focused application on the Great Blue Heron, an emblematic species in freshwater ecosystems that has experienced significant population declines across the United States in recent years. Using the LabelKAN framework, we are able to identify communities and species in New York that will be most sensitive to further declines in Great Blue Heron populations. Our results underscore the critical importance of incorporating information on community assemblage in species distribution modeling. By leveraging species co-occurrence patterns, our approach offers deeper ecological insights and supports more informed conservation planning in the face of accelerating biodiversity loss. Beyond species distribution modeling, LabelKAN provides a principled approach to capturing inter-label connections and can generalize to diverse multi-label tasks. We hope it encourages further research on inter-label learning across domains.

Guangrui Fan, Dandan Liu, Lihu Pan

Online peer-support communities are vital for mental health, but their therapeutic benefit hinges on receiving a timely and helpful first reply. Posts that languish unanswered can exacerbate feelings of distress and abandonment. This paper develops and validates an integrated framework to predict, explain, and reduce this ``reply gap" on Reddit. First, using survival analysis on over 91,000 posts (2018–2025), we show that a deep learning model (DySurv) can accurately predict reply times (C-Index = 0.742), with a post's lexico-semantic content being a far stronger predictor than author history. Second, moving from correlation to causation, we use a causal inference framework on 48,612 posts to estimate the effect of different support types. We find that initial replies providing emotional support are most effective, increasing the odds of a positive user response by 49% (OR=1.49), an effect most pronounced for high-risk users. Third, we operationalize these insights in RiskMatch, a recommender system that routes at-risk posts to historically effective helpers. Rigorous counterfactual evaluation using inverse propensity scoring (IPS)—a method that corrects for biases in historical data—demonstrates that our system reduces the median wait time by 26 minutes for the highest-risk quintile. This work provides a validated, data-driven methodology to build more responsive and effective peer-support ecosystems, offering a concrete pathway to ensure fewer calls for help go unanswered.

Tina Behzad, Siddartha Devic, Vatsal Sharan, Aleksandra Korolova, David Kempe

We conduct an independent, third-party audit for bias of LinkedIn's Talent Search ranking system, focusing on potential ranking bias across two attributes: gender and race. To do so, we first construct a dataset of rankings produced by the system, collecting extensive Talent Search results across a diverse set of occupational queries. We then develop a robust labeling pipeline that infers the two demographic attributes of interest for the returned users. To evaluate potential biases in the collected dataset of real-world rankings, we utilize two exposure disparity metrics: deviation from group proportions and MinSkew@k. Our analysis reveals an under-representation of minority groups in early ranks across many queries. We further examine potential causes of this disparity, and discuss why they may be difficult or, in some cases, impossible to fully eliminate among the early ranks of queries. Beyond static metrics, we also investigate the concept of subgroup fairness over time, highlighting \emph{temporal disparities} in exposure and retention, which are often more difficult to audit for in practice. In employer recruiting platforms such as LinkedIn Talent Search, the persistence of a particular candidate over multiple days in the ranking can directly impact the probability that the given candidate is selected for opportunities. Our analysis reveals demographic disparities in this temporal stability, with some groups experiencing greater volatility in their ranked positions than others. We contextualize all our findings alongside LinkedIn’s published self-audits of its Talent Search system and reflect on the methodological constraints of a black-box external evaluation, including limited observability and noisy demographic inference. Our work contributes empirical insights and practical guidance for conducting third-party audits of modern socio-technical systems which go beyond the well-studied and standard algorithmic fairness guarantees of predictors.

Xiaofei Zhao

The increasing complexity of modern AI systems exposes a significant assurance gap: safety evidence from practices like red-teaming and robustness testing remains fragmented, lacking a formal mechanism for composition and propagation throughout the development lifecycle. This prevents the construction of rigorous, dynamic safety cases essential for trustworthy AI. We introduce the Composable Assurance Framework (CAF), a novel engineering methodology that integrates safety assurance directly into MLOps workflows. At its core is the Formal Safety Assertion (FSA), a standardized, machine-readable structure that verifiably links safety properties—such as robustness scores or the absence of deceptive circuits—to specific AI artifacts. We then define a Composition Calculus, a set of formal rules governing how FSAs are propagated and aggregated as components are combined into a system. This approach transforms the development pipeline into an automated evidence-gathering engine, whose output is a dynamic Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) of assertions that constitutes a living safety case. Through a prototype and a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) case study, we demonstrate how CAF automatically enforces a predefined safety policy, blocking non-compliant deployments.

Aaron J Snoswell, Daniel Kilov, Seth Lazar

As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as Artificial Moral Advisors and autonomous agents making ethical decisions, evaluating their moral competence has become critical. However, existing evaluations may inadequately assess the moral reasoning capabilities needed for real-world deployment, focusing primarily on whether models can match human judgments on carefully curated ethical scenarios. We surveyed 69 papers evaluating LLM ethical competence (2020-2025) and developed a taxonomy categorizing evaluations across datasets, behaviors, and metrics. Our comprehensive analysis maps the methodological landscape of this rapidly growing field and reveals several critical limitations. Most significantly, the vast majority of studies rely on pre-packaged scenarios that highlight morally relevant features, failing to test models' ability to identify ethical considerations in noisy, realistic contexts-what we term "moral sensitivity". Additionally, evaluations overemphasize verdict accuracy rather than assessing moral reasoning quality and steerability, with few studies testing whether models can be appropriately guided toward different ethical frameworks. Most studies rely on "ground truth" comparisons despite philosophical arguments that reasonable moral pluralism precludes definitive moral ground truth. In light of these gaps, we argue for a significant methodological shift: moving from curated scenarios to unfiltered information streams, from verdict accuracy to reasoning quality and steerability, and from ground truth metrics to assessments of reasonableness and consistency. This reorientation is essential for developing AI systems that can navigate moral complexity in real-world deployment scenarios.

Ninell Oldenburg, Ruchira Dhar, Anders Søgaard

In this paper, we argue that current AI research operates on a spectrum between two different underlying conceptions of intelligence: Intelligence Realism, which holds that intelligence represents a single, universal capacity measurable across all systems, and Intelligence Pluralism, which views intelligence as diverse, context-dependent capacities that cannot be reduced to a single universal measure. Through an analysis of current debates in AI research, we demonstrate how the conceptions remain largely implicit yet fundamentally shape how empirical evidence gets interpreted across a wide range of areas. These underlying views generate fundamentally different research approaches across three areas. Methodologically, they produce different approaches to model selection, benchmark design, and experimental validation. Interpretively, they lead to contradictory readings of the same empirical phenomena, from capability emergence to system limitations. Regarding AI risk, they generate categorically different assessments: realists view superintelligence as the primary risk and search for unified alignment solutions, while pluralists see diverse threats across different domains requiring context-specific solutions. We argue that making explicit these underlying assumptions can contribute to a clearer understanding of disagreements in AI research.

Fei Liu, Yilu Liu, Qingfu Zhang, Tong Xialiang, Mingxuan Yuan

Automated Heuristic Design (AHD) using Large Language Models (LLMs) has achieved notable success in the past two years. Despite the effectiveness of existing approaches, they only design a single heuristic to serve all problem instances, often inducing poor generalization across different distributions or sizes. To address this issue, we propose Automated Heuristic Set Design (AHSD), a new methodology for LLM-driven AHD. The aim of AHSD is to automatically design a small-sized complementary heuristic set to serve diverse problem instances, such that each problem instance could be optimized by at least one heuristic in this set. We propose Evolution of Heuristic Set (EoH-S), which realizes AHSD using an evolutionary search framework. It incorporates a complementary population management and a memetic search to design a set of heuristics. Extensive experiments on online bin packing, traveling salesman problem, and capacitated vehicle routing problem show that EoH-S consistently outperforms existing AHD methods. The resulting heuristics exhibit complementary performance across instances of varying sizes and distributions.

Tao Li, Xingchen Li, Haoyue Ma, Zhi-Hui Zhan

Solving energy-saving distributed heterogeneous flexible job shop scheduling problem (ES-DHFJSP) aims to enhance industrial production efficiency while minimizing energy consumption. State-of-the-art co-evolutionary algorithms have emerged as effective approaches for addressing ES-DHFJSP. However, existing methodologies demonstrate compromised convergence rates and excessive computational overhead when confronted with vast search spaces. In this work, we propose a novel solution space transformation-guided co-evolution algorithm (SSTCE) to overcome this limitation. In SSTCE, we first establish an inter-job similarity metric and incorporate constrained hierarchical clustering with optimal leaf ordering (CHC-OLO) to generate clustered job sets, which are subsequently utilized for population initialization that achieves a favorable balance between convergence and diversity. To enhance search capability in expansive solution spaces, we devise a dynamic solution space transformation mechanism that effectively reduces inefficient searches within the algorithm. Furthermore, we develop tailored local search strategies leveraging domain-specific knowledge of DHFJSP properties. Extensive experimental evaluations across 20 benchmark instances demonstrate that SSTCE significantly outperforms existing evolutionary algorithms in solving ES-DHFJSP.

Yuan Zhao, Hualei Zhu, Tingyu Jiang, Shen Li, Xiaohang Xu, Hao Henry Wang

Graphical User Interface (GUI) task automation constitutes a critical frontier in artificial intelligence research. While effective GUI agents synergistically integrate planning and grounding capabilities, current methodologies exhibit two fundamental limitations: (1) insufficient exploitation of cross-model synergies, and (2) over-reliance on synthetic data generation without sufficient utilization. To address these challenges, we propose Co-EPG, a self-iterative training framework for Co-Evolution of Planning and Grounding. Co-EPG establishes an iterative positive feedback loop: through this loop, the planning model explores superior strategies under grounding-based reward guidance via Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), generating diverse data to optimize the grounding model. Concurrently, the optimized Grounding model provides more effective rewards for subsequent GRPO training of the planning model, fostering continuous improvement. Co-EPG thus enables iterative enhancement of agent capabilities through self-play optimization and training data distillation. On the Multimodal-Mind2Web and AndroidControl benchmarks, our framework outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods after just three iterations without requiring external data. The agent consistently improves with each iteration, demonstrating robust self-enhancement capabilities. This work establishes a novel training paradigm for GUI agents, shifting from isolated optimization to an integrated, self-driven co-evolution approach.

Pukun Zhao, Longxiang Wang, Miaowei Wang, Chen Chen, Fanqing Zhou, Haojian Huang

Most existing spatial reasoning benchmarks focus on static or globally observable environments, failing to capture the challenges of long-horizon reasoning and memory utilization under partial observability and dynamic changes. We introduce two dynamic spatial benchmarks—locally observable maze navigation and match-2 elimination—that systematically evaluate models' abilities in spatial understanding and adaptive planning when local perception, environment feedback, and global objectives are tightly coupled. Each action triggers structural changes in the environment, requiring continuous update of cognition and strategy. We further propose a subjective experience-based memory mechanism for cross-task experience transfer and validation. Experiments show that our benchmarks reveal key limitations of mainstream models in dynamic spatial reasoning and long-term memory, providing a comprehensive platform for future methodological advances.

Haoyu Lei, Kaiwen Zhou, Yinchuan Li, Zhitang Chen, Farzan Farnia

Diffusion-based Neural Combinatorial Optimization (NCO) has demonstrated effectiveness in solving NP-complete (NPC) problems by learning discrete diffusion models for solution generation, eliminating hand-crafted domain knowledge. Despite their success, existing NCO methods face significant challenges in both cross-scale and cross-problem generalization, and high training costs compared to traditional solvers. While recent studies on diffusion models have introduced training-free guidance approaches that leverage pre-defined guidance functions for conditional generation, such methodologies have not been extensively explored in combinatorial optimization. To bridge this gap, we propose a training-free inference time adaptation framework (DIFU-Ada) that enables both the zero-shot cross-problem transfer and cross-scale generalization capabilities of diffusion-based NCO solvers without requiring additional training. We provide theoretical analysis that helps understanding the cross-problem transfer capability. Our experimental results demonstrate that a diffusion solver, trained exclusively on the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP), can achieve competitive zero-shot transfer performance across different problem scales on TSP variants, such as Prize Collecting TSP (PCTSP) and the Orienteering Problem (OP), through inference time adaptation.

Yuqi Zhu, Yi Zhong, Jintian Zhang, Ziheng Zhang, Shuofei Qiao, Yujie Luo, Lun Du, Da Zheng, Ningyu Zhang, Huajun Chen

Large Language Models (LLMs) hold promise in automating data analysis tasks, yet open-source models face significant limitations in these kinds of reasoning-intensive scenarios. In this work, we investigate strategies to enhance the data analysis capabilities of open-source LLMs. By curating a seed dataset of diverse, realistic scenarios, we evaluate models across three dimensions: data understanding, code generation, and strategic planning. Our analysis reveals three key findings: (1) Strategic planning quality serves as the primary determinant of model performance; (2) Interaction design and task complexity significantly influence reasoning capabilities; (3) Data quality demonstrates a greater impact than diversity in achieving optimal performance. We leverage these insights to develop a data synthesis methodology, demonstrating significant improvements in open-source LLMs' analytical reasoning capabilities.

Wuqiang Zheng, Yiyan Xu, Xinyu Lin, Chongming Gao, Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng

With the rapid and continuous increase in academic publications, identifying high-quality research has become an increasingly pressing challenge. While recent methods leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) for automated paper evaluation have shown great promise, they are often constrained by outdated domain knowledge and limited reasoning capabilities. In this work, we present PaperEval, a novel LLM-based framework for automated paper evaluation that addresses these limitations through two key components: 1) a domain-aware paper retrieval module that retrieves relevant concurrent work to support contextualized assessments of novelty and contributions, and 2) a latent reasoning mechanism that enables deep understanding of complex motivations and methodologies, along with comprehensive comparison against concurrently related work, to support more accurate and reliable evaluation. To guide the reasoning process, we introduce a progressive ranking optimization strategy that encourages the LLM to iteratively refine its predictions with an emphasis on relative comparison. Experiments on two datasets demonstrate that PaperEval consistently outperforms existing methods in both academic impact and paper quality evaluation. In addition, we deploy PaperEval in a real-world paper recommendation system for filtering high-quality papers, which has gained strong engagement on social media---amassing over 8,000 subscribers and attracting over 10,000 views for many filtered high-quality papers---demonstrating the practical effectiveness of PaperEval.