Large Language Models (LLMs) often exhibit knowledge disparities across languages. Encouraging LLMs to \textit{abstain} when faced with knowledge gaps is a promising strategy to reduce hallucinations in multilingual settings. Current abstention strategies for multilingual scenarios primarily rely on generating feedback in various languages using LLMs and performing self-reflection. However, these methods can be adversely impacted by inaccuracies and biases in the generated feedback. To address this, from a causal perspective, we introduce \textit{CausalAbstain}, a method that helps LLMs determine whether to utilize multiple generated feedback responses and how to identify the most useful ones. Extensive experiments demonstrate that \textit{CausalAbstain} effectively selects helpful feedback and enhances abstention decisions with interpretability in both native language (\textit{Casual-native}) and multilingual (\textit{Causal-multi}) settings, outperforming strong baselines on two benchmark datasets covering encyclopedic and commonsense knowledge QA tasks.
论文检索
输入标题、作者或关键词，从 12,319 篇学术成果中精准定位
Recent advances in neural topic models (NTMs) have improved topic quality but still face challenges: weak document-topic alignment, high inference costs due to large pretrained language models (PLMs), and limited modeling of hierarchical topic structures. To address these issues, we introduce HiCOT (Hierarchical Clustering and Contrastive Learning with Optimal Transport for Neural Topic Modeling), a novel framework that enhances topic coherence and efficiency. HiCOT integrates Optimal Transport to refine document-topic relationships using compact PLM-based embeddings, captures semantic structure of the documents. Additionally, it employs hierarchical clustering combine with contrastive learning to disentangle topic-word and topic-topic relationships, ensuring clearer structure and better coherence. Experimental results on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate HiCOT’s superior effectiveness over existing NTMs in topic coherence, topic performance, representation quality, and computational efficiency.
Lost in Translation: Benchmarking Commercial Machine Translation Models for Dyslexic-Style Text
PDF ↗Dyslexia can affect writing, leading to unique patterns such as letter and homophone swapping. As a result, text produced by people with dyslexia often differs from the text typically used to train natural language processing (NLP) models, raising concerns about their effectiveness for dyslexic users. This paper examines the fairness of four commercial machine translation (MT) systems towards dyslexic text through a systematic audit using both synthetically generated dyslexic text and real writing from individuals with dyslexia. By programmatically introducing various dyslexic-style errors into the WMT dataset, we present insights on how dyslexic biases manifest in MT systems as the text becomes more dyslexic, especially with real-word errors. Our results shed light on the NLP biases affecting people with dyslexia – a population that often relies on NLP tools as assistive technologies, highlighting the need for more diverse data and user representation in the development of foundational NLP models.
Autonomous embodied agents live on an Internet of multimedia websites. Can they hop around multimodal websites to complete complex user tasks? Existing benchmarks fail to assess them in a realistic, evolving environment for their embodiment across websites. To answer this question, we present MMInA, a multihop and multimodal benchmark to evaluate the embodied agents for compositional Internet tasks, with several appealing properties: ***1) Evolving real-world multimodal websites.*** Our benchmark uniquely operates on evolving real-world websites, ensuring a high degree of realism and applicability to natural user tasks. Our data includes 1,050 human-written tasks covering various domains such as shopping and travel, with each task requiring the agent to extract multimodal information from web pages as observations autonomously. ***2) Multihop web browsing.*** Our dataset features naturally compositional tasks that require information from or actions on multiple websites to solve, to assess long-range reasoning capabilities on web tasks. ***3) Holistic evaluation.*** We propose a novel protocol for evaluating an agent’s progress in completing multihop tasks. We experiment with both standalone (multimodal) language models and heuristic-based web agents. Extensive experiments demonstrate that while long-chain multihop web tasks are easy for humans, they remain challenging for state-of-the-art web agents. We identify that agents are more likely to fail on the early hops when solving tasks of more hops, which results in lower task success rates. To address this issue, we propose a simple memory augmentation approach replaying past action trajectories to reflect. Our method significantly improves the performance of both the single-hop and multihop web browsing abilities.
A core part of legal work that has been underexplored in Legal NLP is the writing and editing of legal briefs. This requires not only a thorough understanding of the law of a jurisdiction, from judgments to statutes, but also the ability to make new arguments to try to expand the law in a new direction and make novel and creative arguments that are persuasive to judges. To capture and evaluate these legal skills in language models, we introduce BRIEFME, a new dataset focused on legal briefs. It contains three tasks for language models to assist legal professionals in writing briefs: argument summarization, argument completion, and case retrieval. In this work, we describe the creation of these tasks, analyze them, and show how current models perform. We see that today’s large language models (LLMs) are already quite good at the summarization and guided completion tasks, even beating human-generated headings. Yet, they perform poorly on other tasks in our benchmark: realistic argument completion and retrieving relevant legal cases. We hope this dataset encourages more development in Legal NLP in ways that will specifically aid people in performing legal work.
LAM SIMULATOR: Advancing Data Generation for Large Action Model Training via Online Exploration and Trajectory Feedback
PDF ↗Large Action Models (LAMs) for AI Agents offer incredible potential but face challenges due to the need for high-quality training data, especially for multi-steps tasks that involve planning, executing tool calls, and responding to feedback. To address these issues, we present LAM SIMULATOR, a comprehensive framework designed for online exploration of agentic tasks with high-quality feedback. Our framework features a dynamic task query generator, an extensive collection of tools, and an interactive environment where Large Language Model (LLM) Agents can call tools and receive real-time feedback. This setup enables LLM Agents to explore and solve tasks autonomously, facilitating the discovery of multiple approaches to tackle any given task. The resulting action trajectory data are then used to create high-quality training datasets for LAMs. Our experiments on popular agentic benchmarks, ToolBench and CRMArena, highlight the effectiveness of LAM SIMULATOR: models trained with self-generated datasets using our framework achieve significant performance gains, up to a 49.3% improvement over their original baselines. LAM SIMULATOR requires minimal human input during dataset creation, highlighting LAM SIMULATOR’s efficiency and effectiveness in speeding up development of AI agents.
The widespread use of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) has raised concerns about model toxicity. However, current research mainly focuses on explicit toxicity, with less attention to some more implicit toxicity regarding prejudice and discrimination. To address this limitation, we introduce a subtler type of toxicity named dual-implicit toxicity and a novel toxicity benchmark termed MDIT-Bench: Multimodal Dual-Implicit Toxicity Benchmark. Specifically, we first create the MDIT-Dataset with dual-implicit toxicity using the proposed Multi-stage Human-in-loop In-context Generation method. Based on this dataset, we construct the MDIT-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating the sensitivity of models to dual-implicit toxicity, with 317,638 questions covering 12 categories, 23 subcategories, and 780 topics. MDIT-Bench includes three difficulty levels, and we propose a metric to measure the toxicity gap exhibited by the model across them. In the experiment, we conducted MDIT-Bench on 13 prominent LMMs, and the results show that these LMMs cannot handle dual-implicit toxicity effectively. The model’s performance drops significantly in hard level, revealing that these LMMs still contain a significant amount of hidden but activatable toxicity. The data will be released upon the paper’s acceptance.
Recent advancements in AI-generated content (AIGC) have heightened concerns about harmful outputs, such as misinformation and malicious misuse.Existing detection methods face two key limitations:(1) lacking real-world AIGC scenarios and corresponding risk datasets, and(2) both traditional and multimodal large language models (MLLMs) struggle to detect risks in AIGC.Towards this end, we introduce **AIGuard**, the first benchmark for AIGC risk detection in real-world e-commerce. It includes 253,420 image-text pairs (i.e., the risk content and risk description) across four critical categories: *abnormal body*, *violating physical laws*, *misleading or illogical context*, and *harmful or problematic message*.To effectively detect these risks, we propose distilling text annotations into dense soft prompts and identifying risk content through image soft prompt matching during inference.Experiments on the benchmark show that this method achieves a 9.68% higher recall than leading multimodal models while using only 25% of the training resources and improving inference speed by 37.8 times.For further research, our benchmark and code are available at [https://github.com/wenh-zhang/aiguard-dataset](https://github.com/wenh-zhang/aiguard-dataset).
As large language models (LLM) become more and more capable in languages other than English, it is important to collect benchmark datasets in order to evaluate their multilingual performance, including on tasks like machine translation (MT). In this work, we extend the WMT24 dataset to cover 55 languages by collecting new human-written references and post-edits for 46 new languages/dialects in addition to post-edits of the references in 8 out of 9 languages in the original WMT24 dataset. We benchmark a variety of MT providers and LLMs on the collected dataset using automatic metrics and find that LLMs are the best-performing MT systems in all 55 languages. However, we caution against using our results to reach strong conclusions about MT quality without a human-based evaluation due to limitations of automatic evaluation metrics, which we leave for future work.
Bridging Robustness and Generalization Against Word Substitution Attacks in NLP via the Growth Bound Matrix Approach
PDF ↗Despite advancements in Natural Language Processing (NLP), models remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks, such as synonym substitutions. While prior work has focused on improving robustness for feed-forward and convolutional architectures, the robustness of recurrent networks and modern state space models (SSMs), such as S4, remains understudied. These architectures pose unique challenges due to their sequential processing and complex parameter dynamics. In this paper, we introduce a novel regularization technique based on Growth Bound Matrices (GBM) to improve NLP model robustness by reducing the impact of input perturbations on model outputs. We focus on computing the GBM for three architectures: Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), State Space models (S4), and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN). Our method aims to (1) enhance resilience against word substitution attacks, (2) improve generalization on clean text, and (3) providing the first systematic analysis of SSM (S4) robustness. Extensive experiments across multiple architectures and benchmark datasets demonstrate that our method improves adversarial robustness by up to (8.8%) over existing baselines. These results highlight the effectiveness of our approach, outperforming several state-of-the-art methods in adversarial defense. Codes are available at https://github.com/BouriMohammed/GBM
FIHA: Automated Fine-grained Hallucinations Evaluations in Large Vision Language Models with Davidson Scene Graphs
PDF ↗The rapid development of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) often comes with widespread hallucination issues, making cost-effective and comprehensive assessments increasingly vital. Current approaches mainly rely on costly annotations and are not comprehensive – in terms of evaluating all aspects, such as relations, attributes, and dependencies between aspects. Therefore, we introduce the FIHA (automated Fine-graIned Hallucination evAluation in LVLMs), which could access LVLMs hallucination in an LLM-free and annotation-free way and model the dependency between different types of hallucinations. FIHA can generate Q&A pairs on any image dataset at minimal cost, enabling hallucination assessment from both image and caption. Based on this approach, we introduce a benchmark called FIHA-v1, which consists of diverse questions on various images from three datasets. Furthermore, we use the Davidson Scene Graph (DSG) to organize the structure among Q&A pairs, in which we can increase the reliability of the evaluation. We evaluate representative models using FIHA-v1, highlighting their limitations and challenges. We released our code and data at https://github.com/confidentzzzs/FIHA.
Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) in large language models (LLMs) is challenging because benchmarks can quickly become stale. Questions initially requiring retrieval may become answerable from pretraining knowledge as newer models incorporate more recent information during pretraining, making it difficult to distinguish evidence-based reasoning from recall. We introduce NeoQA (News Events for Out-of-training Question Answering), a benchmark designed to address this issue. To construct NeoQA, we generated timelines and knowledge bases of fictional news events and entities along with news articles and Q&A pairs to prevent LLMs from leveraging pretraining knowledge, ensuring that no prior evidence exists in their training data. We propose our dataset as a new platform for evaluating evidence-based question answering, as it requires LLMs to generate responses exclusively from retrieved evidence and only when sufficient evidence is available. NeoQA enables controlled evaluation across various evidence scenarios, including cases with missing or misleading details. Our findings indicate that LLMs struggle to distinguish subtle mismatches between questions and evidence, and suffer from short-cut reasoning when key information required to answer a question is missing from the evidence, underscoring key limitations in evidence-based reasoning.
Recent work found that LLMs are sensitive to a wide range of arbitrary prompt dimensions, including the type of delimiters, answer enumerators, instruction wording, and more. This throws into question popular single-prompt evaluation practices. We present DOVE (Dataset Of Variation Evaluation) a large-scale dataset containing prompt perturbations of various evaluation benchmarks. In contrast to previous work, we examine LLM sensitivity from an holistic perspective, and assess the joint effects of perturbations along various dimensions, resulting in thousands of perturbations per instance. We evaluate several model families against DOVE, leading to several findings, including efficient methods for choosing well-performing prompts, observing that few-shot examples reduce sensitivity, and identifying instances which are inherently hard across all perturbations. DOVE consists of more than 250M prompt perturbations and model outputs, which we make publicly available to spur a community-wide effort toward meaningful, robust, and efficient evaluation. Browse the data, contribute, and more at: https://slab-nlp.github.io/DOVE
Listen, Watch, and Learn to Feel: Retrieval-Augmented Emotion Reasoning for Compound Emotion Generation
PDF ↗The ability to comprehend human emotion using multimodal large language models (MLLMs) is essential for advancing human-AI interaction and multimodal sentiment analysis. While psychology theory-based human annotations have contributed to multimodal emotion tasks, the subjective nature of emotional perception often leads to inconsistent annotations, limiting the robustness of current models. Addressing these challenges requires more fine-grained methods and evaluation frameworks. In this paper, we propose the Retrieval-Augmented Emotion Reasoning (RAER) framework, a plug-and-play module that enhances MLLMs’ ability to tackle compound and context-rich emotion tasks. To systematically evaluate model performance, we introduce the Stimulus-Armed Bandit (SAB) framework, designed to benchmark emotional reasoning capabilities. Additionally, we construct the Compound Emotion QA dataset, an AI-generated multimodal dataset aimed at strengthening emotion understanding in MLLMs. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of RAER across both traditional benchmarks and SAB evaluations, highlighting its potential to enhance emotional intelligence in multimodal AI systems.
Generating Pedagogically Meaningful Visuals for Math Word Problems: A New Benchmark and Analysis of Text-to-Image Models
PDF ↗Visuals are valuable tools for teaching math word problems (MWPs), helping young learners interpret textual descriptions into mathematical expressions before solving them.However, creating such visuals is labor-intensive and there is a lack of automated methods to support this process. In this paper, we present Math2Visual, an automatic framework for generating pedagogically meaningful visuals from MWP text descriptions. Math2Visual leverages a pre-defined visual language and a design space grounded in interviews with math teachers, to illustrate the core mathematical relationships in MWPs.Using Math2Visual, we construct an annotated dataset of 1,903 visuals and evaluate Text-to-Image (TTI) models for their ability to generate visuals that align with our design. We further fine-tune several TTI models with our dataset, demonstrating improvements in educational visual generation. Our work establishes a new benchmark for automated generation of pedagogically meaningful visuals and offers insights into key challenges in producing multimodal educational content, such as the misrepresentation of mathematical relationships and the omission of essential visual elements.
LSC-Eval: A General Framework to Evaluate Methods for Assessing Dimensions of Lexical Semantic Change Using LLM-Generated Synthetic Data
PDF ↗Lexical Semantic Change (LSC) provides insight into cultural and social dynamics. Yet, the validity of methods for measuring different kinds of LSC remains unestablished due to the absence of historical benchmark datasets. To address this gap, we propose LSC-Eval, a novel three-stage general-purpose evaluation framework to: (1) develop a scalable methodology for generating synthetic datasets that simulate theory-driven LSC using In-Context Learning and a lexical database; (2) use these datasets to evaluate the sensitivity of computational methods to synthetic change; and (3) assess their suitability for detecting change in specific dimensions and domains. We apply LSC-Eval to simulate changes along the Sentiment, Intensity, and Breadth (SIB) dimensions, as defined in the SIBling framework, using examples from psychology. We then evaluate the ability of selected methods to detect these controlled interventions. Our findings validate the use of synthetic benchmarks, demonstrate that tailored methods effectively detect changes along SIB dimensions, and reveal that a state-of-the-art LSC model faces challenges in detecting affective dimensions of LSC. LSC-Eval offers a valuable tool for dimension- and domain-specific benchmarking of LSC methods, with particular relevance to the social sciences.
2M-BELEBELE: Highly Multilingual Speech and American Sign Language Comprehension Dataset Download PDF
PDF ↗We introduce the first highly multilingual speech and American Sign Language (ASL) comprehension dataset by extending BELEBELE. Our dataset covers 91 spoken languages at the intersection of BELEBELE and FLEURS, and one sign language (ASL). As a by-product we also extend the Automatic Speech Recognition Benchmark, FLEURS, by 20%. We evaluate 2M-BELEBELE dataset for both 5-shot and zero-shot settings and across languages, the speech comprehension accuracy is ≈ 10% average lower compared to reading comprehension.
This paper presents the Long Context and Form Output (LCFO) benchmark, a novel evaluation framework for assessing gradual summarization and summary expansion capabilities across diverse domains. LCFO consists of long input documents (5k words average length), each of which comes with three summaries of different lengths (20%, 10%, and 5% of the input text), as well as approximately 15 questions and answers (QA) related to the input content. Notably, LCFO also provides alignments between specific QA pairs and corresponding summaries in 7 domains. The primary motivation behind providing summaries of different lengths is to establish a controllable framework for generating long texts from shorter inputs, i.e. summary expansion. To establish an evaluation metric framework for summarization and summary expansion, we provide human evaluation scores for human-generated outputs, as well as results from various state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs). GPT-4o-mini achieves best human scores among automatic systems in both summarization and summary expansion tasks (≈ +10% and +20%, respectively). It even surpasses human output quality in the case of short summaries (≈ +7%). Overall automatic metrics achieve low correlations with human evaluation scores (≈ 0.4) but moderate correlation on specific evaluation aspects such as fluency and attribution (≈ 0.6).
Refining Sentence Embedding Model through Ranking Sentences Generation with Large Language Models
PDF ↗Sentence embedding is essential for many NLP tasks, with contrastive learning methods achieving strong performance using annotated datasets like NLI. Yet, the reliance on manual labels limits scalability. Recent studies leverage large language models (LLMs) to generate sentence pairs, reducing annotation dependency. However, they overlook ranking information crucial for fine-grained semantic distinctions. To tackle this challenge, we propose a method for controlling the generation direction of LLMs in the latent space. Unlike unconstrained generation, the controlled approach ensures meaningful semantic divergence. Then, we refine exist sentence embedding model by integrating ranking information and semantic information. Experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that our method achieves new SOTA performance with a modest cost in ranking sentence synthesis.
CoDet-M4: Detecting Machine-Generated Code in Multi-Lingual, Multi-Generator and Multi-Domain Settings
PDF ↗Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized code generation, automating programming with remarkable efficiency. However, this has had important consequences for programming skills, ethics, and assessment integrity, thus making the detection of LLM-generated code essential for maintaining accountability and standards. While, there has been some previous research on this problem, it generally lacks domain coverage and robustness, and only covers a small number of programming languages. Here, we aim to bridge this gap. In particular, we propose a framework capable of distinguishing between human-written and LLM-generated program code across multiple programming languages, code generators, and domains. We use a large-scale dataset from renowned platforms and LLM-based code generators, alongside applying rigorous data quality checks, feature engineering, and comparative analysis of traditional machine learning models, pre-trained language models (PLMs), and LLMs for code detection. We perform an evaluation on out-of-domain scenarios, such as detecting authorship and hybrid authorship of generated code and generalizing to unseen models, domains, and programming languages. Our extensive experiments show that our framework effectively distinguishes human-written from LLM-generated program code, setting a new benchmark for the task.