论文检索

输入标题、作者或关键词,从 2,480 篇学术成果中精准定位

会议来源 全部会议

机器学习与综合 AI

自然语言处理

计算机视觉

数据挖掘与 Web

多媒体与图形学

未选择时检索全部会议
支持跨会议组合检索,PDF 均跳转至官方来源
2,480篇论文匹配“Speech”
第 39 / 124 页

Applications · Language, Speech and Dialog

Jiayu Wang, Yifei Ming, Riya Dulepet, Qinglin Chen, Austin Xu, Zixuan Ke, Frederic Sala, Aws Albarghouthi, Caiming Xiong, Shafiq Joty

Deep research---producing comprehensive, citation-backed reports by searching across hundreds of live websites---marks an important frontier for agentic systems. To rigorously evaluate this ability, three principles are essential: tasks should be (1) user-centric, reflecting realistic information needs, (2) dynamic, requiring up-to-date information beyond parametric knowledge, and (3) unambiguous, ensuring consistent interpretation across users. Existing benchmarks fall short of these principles, often focusing on narrow domains or posing ambiguous questions that hinder fair comparison. Guided by these principles, we introduce LiveResearchBench, a benchmark of 100 expert-curated tasks spanning daily life, enterprise, and academia, each requiring extensive, dynamic, real-time web search and synthesis. Built with over 1,500 hours of human labor, LiveResearchBench provides a rigorous basis for systematic evaluation. To evaluate citation-grounded long-form reports, we present DeepEval, a comprehensive suite covering both content- and report-level quality: checklists for coverage and presentation, rubric-tree assessments of citation accuracy and traceability, and metrics for consistency and depth of analysis. Using LiveResearchBench and DeepEval, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of frontier deep research systems, including single-agent web search, single-agent deep research, and multi-agent systems. Our analysis reveals current strengths, recurring failure modes, and key system components needed to advance reliable, insightful deep research. Our code is available at: https://github.com/SalesforceAIResearch/LiveResearchBench.

Applications · Language, Speech and Dialog

Jiachun Li, Pengfei Cao, Zhuoran Jin, Yubo Chen, Jiexin Xu, Huaijun Li, Xiaojian Jiang, Kang Liu, Jun Zhao

Inference-time scaling techniques have shown promise in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). While recent research has primarily focused on training-time optimization, our work highlights inference-time reward model (RM)-based reasoning as a critical yet overlooked avenue. In this paper, we conduct a systematic analysis of RM behavior across downstream reasoning tasks, revealing three key limitations: (1) RM can impair performance on simple questions, (2) its discriminative ability declines with increased sampling, and (3) high search diversity undermines RM performance. To address these issues, we propose CRISP (Clustered Reward Integration with Stepwise Prefixing), a novel inference-time algorithm that clusters generated reasoning paths by final answers, aggregates reward signals at the cluster level, and adaptively updates prefix prompts to guide generation. Experimental results demonstrate that CRISP significantly enhances LLM reasoning performance, achieving up to 5% accuracy improvement over other RM-based inference methods and an average of 10% gain over advanced reasoning models.

Deep Learning · Algorithms

Christopher Mitcheltree, Vincent Lostanlen, Emmanouil Benetos, Mathieu Lagrange

The Euclidean distance between wavelet scattering transform coefficients (known as paths) provides informative gradients for perceptual quality assessment of deep inverse problems in computer vision, speech, and audio processing. However, these transforms are computationally expensive when employed as differentiable loss functions for stochastic gradient descent due to their numerous paths, which significantly limits their use in neural network training. Against this problem, we propose "Scattering transform with Random Paths for machine Learning" (SCRAPL): a stochastic optimization scheme for efficient evaluation of multivariable scattering transforms. We implement SCRAPL for the joint time–frequency scattering transform (JTFS) which demodulates spectrotemporal patterns at multiple scales and rates, allowing a fine characterization of intermittent auditory textures. We apply SCRAPL to differentiable digital signal processing (DDSP), specifically, unsupervised sound matching of a granular synthesizer and the Roland TR-808 drum machine. We also propose an initialization heuristic based on importance sampling, which adapts SCRAPL to the perceptual content of the dataset, improving neural network convergence and evaluation performance. We make our code and audio samples available and provide SCRAPL as a Python package.

Applications · Language, Speech and Dialog

Taeyoon Kwon, Dongwook Choi, Hyojun Kim, Sunghwan Kim, Seungjun Moon, Beong-woo Kwak, Kuan-Hao Huang, Jinyoung Yeo

LLM-powered embodied agents have shown success on conventional object-rearrangement tasks, but providing personalized assistance that leverages user-specific knowledge from past interactions presents new challenges. We investigate these challenges through the lens of agents' memory utilization along two critical dimensions: object semantics (identifying objects based on personal meaning) and user patterns (recalling sequences from behavioral routines). To assess these capabilities, we construct Memento, an end-to-end two-stage evaluation framework comprising single-memory and joint-memory tasks. Our experiments reveal that current agents can recall simple object semantics but struggle to apply sequential user patterns to planning. Through in-depth analysis, we identify two critical bottlenecks: information overload and coordination failures when handling multiple memories. Based on these findings, we explore memory architectural approaches to address these challenges. Given our observation that episodic memory provides both personalized knowledge and in-context learning benefits, we design a hierarchical knowledge graph-based user-profile memory module that separately manages personalized knowledge, achieving substantial improvements on both single and joint-memory tasks.

Applications · Language, Speech and Dialog

Siyin Wang, Wenyi Yu, Xianzhao Chen, Xiaohai Tian, Jun Zhang, Lu Lu, Yuxuan Wang, Chao Zhang

Human interaction is inherently multimodal and full-duplex: we listen while watching, speak while acting, and fluidly adapt to turn-taking and interruptions. Realizing these capabilities is essential for building models simulating humans. We present ELLSA (End-to-end Listen, Look, Speak and Act), which, to our knowledge, is the first full-duplex, end-to-end model that simultaneously perceives and generates across vision, text, speech, and action within a single architecture, enabling interaction patterns previously out of reach, yielding more natural, human-like behaviors. At its core is a novel SA-MoE architecture (Self-Attention Mixture-of-Experts) that routes each modality to specialized experts and fuses them through a unified attention backbone. This provides a generalizable solution for joint multimodal perception and concurrent generation, leveraging strong pre-trained components while enabling efficient modality integration and mitigating modality interference. On speech-interaction and robot-manipulation benchmarks, ELLSA matches modality-specific baselines, while uniquely supporting advanced multimodal and full-duplex behaviors such as dialogue and action turn-taking, defective instruction rejection, speaking-while-acting, context-grounded visual question answering, and action barge-ins. We contend that ELLSA represents a step toward more natural and general interactive intelligence, contributing to the broader pursuit of artificial general intelligence. A demonstration is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/LLSA-E821.

Applications · Language, Speech and Dialog

Shengjie Gong, Wenjie Peng, Hongyuan Chen, Gangyu Zhang, Yunqing Hu, Huiyuan Zhang, Shuangping Huang, Tianshui Chen

Text-to-CAD code generation is a long-horizon task, requiring the translation of instructions into a long sequence of interdependent operations. This process is exceptionally fragile, as minor early errors can propagate through the sequence and ultimately invalidate an entire complex assembly. Existing methods typically decode instructions directly into executable code (e.g., bpy) without an explicit representation of assembly hierarchy or geometric constraints. This flat decoding strategy vastly expands the search space, amplifying local errors and leading to cascading failures in contextual operations. We address this gap by learning an intermediate representation: a hierarchical and geometry-aware graph. The graph represents an assembly-based decomposition, with multi-level nodes modeling the product's parts and components, and edges defining the explicit geometric constraints between them. Rather than mapping text directly to code, our graph paradigm first predicts high-level structure and constraints, then conditions the sequencing of operations and program generation, thereby narrowing the search space and improving both geometric fidelity and constraint satisfaction. Furthermore, we introduce a structure-aware progressive curriculum learning mechanism to enhance the model's ability to generate sophisticated decomposition graphs, allowing it to handle more complex assemblies. The mechanism constructs graded tasks via controlled edits to object structure, probes the model’s capability boundary, and synthesizes boundary examples for subsequent training rounds. We also introduce a 12K-instruction dataset annotated with instructions, geometric decomposition graphs, action sequences, and bpy code, together with metrics for node- and hierarchy-level graph accuracy and a measure of constraint satisfaction. Extensive experiments show that our approach outperforms existing methods in terms of both geometric fidelity and accurate fulfillment of geometric constraints.

Applications · Language, Speech and Dialog

Peter Baile Chen, Yi Zhang, Dan Roth, Samuel Madden, Jacob Andreas, Mike Cafarella

While humans naturally learn and adapt from past experiences, large language models (LLMs) and their agentic counterparts often fail to retain reasoning from previous tasks and apply it to future contexts. We introduce **L**og-**A**ugmented **G**eneration (LAG), a novel framework that *directly reuses* prior computation and reasoning from past logs at test time, enabling models to learn from previous tasks to perform better on new, unseen challenges, without sacrificing efficiency or scalability. Our approach represents task logs as key-value (KV) caches that encode the reasoning context of prior tasks, while storing KV values for only a selected subset of tokens. When a new task arises, LAG retrieves KV values from relevant logs to augment generation. Unlike reflection-based memory mechanisms, which require additional extraction or distillation steps, LAG reuses prior reasoning verbatim. Moreover, it extends beyond existing KV caching techniques, primarily designed for efficiency, by explicitly improving accuracy through log reuse. Experiments on knowledge- and reasoning-intensive datasets demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms standard agentic systems without log utilization, as well as existing approaches based on reflection and KV cache techniques.

Applications · Language, Speech and Dialog

Chenyu Wang, Paria Rashidinejad, Andy (DiJia) Su, Song Jiang, Sid Wang, Siyan Zhao, Cai Zhou, Shannon Shen, Feiyu Chen, Tommi Jaakkola 等

Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) are emerging as an efficient alternative to autoregressive models due to their ability to decode multiple tokens in parallel. However, aligning dLLMs with human preferences or task-specific rewards via reinforcement learning (RL) is challenging because their intractable log-likelihood precludes the direct application of standard policy gradient methods. While prior work uses surrogates like the evidence lower bound (ELBO), these one-sided approximations can introduce significant policy gradient bias. To address this, we propose the Sandwiched Policy Gradient (SPG) that leverages both an upper and a lower bound of the true log-likelihood. Experiments show that SPG significantly outperforms baselines based on ELBO or one-step estimation. Specifically, SPG improves the accuracy over state-of-the-art RL methods for dLLMs by 3.6% on GSM8K, 2.6% on MATH500, 18.4% on Countdown, and 27.0% on Sudoku.

Applications · Language, Speech and Dialog

Vésteinn Snæbjarnarson, Samuel Kiegeland, Tianyu Liu, Reda Boumasmoud, Ryan Cotterell, Tim Vieira

Modern language models define distributions over strings, but downstream tasks often require different output formats. For instance, a model that generates byte-pair strings does not directly produce word-level predictions, and a DNA model does not directly produce amino-acid sequences. In such cases, a deterministic string-to-string transformation can convert the model's output to the desired form. This is a familiar pattern in probability theory: applying a function $f$ to a random variable $X\sim p$ yields a transformed random variable $f(X)$ with an induced distribution. While such transformations are occasionally used in language modeling, prior work does not treat them as yielding new, fully functional language models. We formalize this perspective and introduce a general framework for language models derived from deterministic string-to-string transformations. We focus on transformations representable as finite-state transducers---a commonly used state-machine abstraction for efficient string-to-string mappings. We develop algorithms that compose a language model with an FST to *marginalize* over source strings mapping to a given target, propagating probabilities through the transducer without altering model parameters and enabling *conditioning* on transformed outputs. We present an exact algorithm, an efficient approximation, and a theoretical analysis. We conduct experiments in three domains: converting language models from tokens to bytes, from tokens to words, and from DNA to amino acids. These experiments demonstrate inference-time adaptation of pretrained language models to match application-specific output requirements.

Applications · Language, Speech and Dialog

Tom Kempton, Julia Rozanova, Parameswaran Kamalaruban, Maeve Madigan, Karolina Wresilo, Yoann Launay, David Sutton, Stuart Burrell

Large Language Models (LLMs) are a powerful tool for statistical text analysis, with derived sequences of next-token probability distributions offering a wealth of information. Extracting this signal typically relies on metrics such as perplexity, which do not adequately account for context; how one should interpret a given next-token probability is dependent on the number of reasonable choices encoded by the shape of the conditional distribution. In this work, we present DMAP, a mathematically grounded method that maps a text, via a language model, to a set of samples in the unit interval that jointly encode rank and probability information. This representation enables efficient, model-agnostic analysis and supports a range of applications. We illustrate its utility through three case studies: (i) validation of generation parameters to ensure data integrity, (ii) examining the role of probability curvature in machine-generated text detection, and (iii) a forensic analysis revealing statistical fingerprints left in downstream models that have been subject to post-training on synthetic data. Our results demonstrate that DMAP offers a unified statistical view of text that is simple to compute on consumer hardware, widely applicable, and provides a foundation for further research into text analysis with LLMs.

Applications · Language, Speech and Dialog

Yilei Chen, Souradip Chakraborty, Lorenz Wolf, Ioannis Paschalidis, Aldo Pacchiano

Reinforcement learning has emerged as a popular method for post-training large language models (LLMs). While improving the model's performance on downstream tasks, it often reduces the model's output diversity, leading to narrow, canonical responses. Existing methods to enhance diversity are limited, either by operating at inference time or by focusing on lexical differences. We propose a novel training method named DQO (Diversity Quality Optimization) based on determinantal point processes (DPPs) to jointly optimize LLMs for quality and semantic diversity. Our approach samples and embeds a group of responses for each prompt, then uses the determinant of a kernel-based similarity matrix to measure diversity as the volume spanned by the embeddings of these responses. Experiments across instruction-following, summarization, story generation, and reasoning tasks demonstrate that our method substantially improves semantic diversity without sacrificing model quality.

Applications · Language, Speech and Dialog

Min-Sang Baek, Gyeong-Su Kim, Donghyun Kim, Joon-Hyuk Chang

Sound source localization (SSL) is a fundamental task in spatial audio understanding, yet most deep neural network-based methods are constrained by fixed array geometries and predefined directional grids, limiting generalizability and scalability. To address these issues, we propose _audio-geometry-grid representation learning_ (AGG-RL), a novel framework that jointly learns audio-geometry and grid representations in a shared latent space, enabling both geometry-invariant and grid-flexible SSL. Moreover, to enhance generalizability and interpretability, we introduce two physics-informed components: a _learnable non-uniform discrete Fourier transform_ (LNuDFT), which optimizes the dense allocation of frequency bins in a non-uniform manner to emphasize informative phase regions, and a _relative microphone positional encoding_ (rMPE), which encodes relative microphone coordinates in accordance with the nature of inter-channel time differences. Experiments on synthetic and real datasets demonstrate that AGG-RL achieves superior performance, particularly under unseen conditions. The results highlight the potential of representation learning with physics-informed design towards a universal solution for spatial acoustic scene understanding across diverse scenarios.

Shu-wen Yang, Ming Tu, Ting-Wei Liu, Xinghua Qu, Hung-yi Lee, Lu Lu, Yuxuan Wang, Yonghui Wu

Speech-to-Speech (S2S) models have shown promising dialogue capabilities, but their ability to handle paralinguistic cues—such as emotion, tone, and speaker attributes—and to respond appropriately in both content and style remains underexplored. Progress is further hindered by the scarcity of high-quality and expressive demonstrations. To address this, we introduce a novel reinforcement learning (RL) framework for paralinguistic-aware S2S, ParaS2S, which evaluates and optimizes both response content and speaking style directly at the waveform level. We first construct ParaS2SBench, a benchmark that evaluates the naturalness of input–output pairs in terms of content and speaking style using expressive and challenging queries. For the automatic judge, we propose a PolyTone training strategy and a multi-stage framework, preventing the style hallucination of end-to-end audio LLM judging. Our judge correlates well with human preferences and is scalable, enabling the model to interact and learn from unlabeled speech via RL. Experiments show that existing S2S models fail to respond appropriately to paralinguistic attributes, performing no better than pipeline-based baselines. Our RL approach (ParaS2SAlign) achieves an 10% relative improvement in the appropriateness of response content and speaking style on ParaS2SBench over supervised fine-tuning (SFT), surpassing all prior models while requiring substantially fewer paired demonstrations than pure SFT. Our findings highlight the need for a scalable and accurate automatic evaluator for speech-to-speech interaction.

Applications · Language, Speech and Dialog

Jiliang Ni, Jiachen Pu, Zhongyi Yang, Jingfeng Luo, Conggang Hu

The proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs) in function calling is pivotal for creating advanced AI agents, yet their large scale hinders widespread adoption, necessitating transferring their capabilities into smaller ones. However, existing paradigms are often plagued by overfitting, training instability, ineffective binary rewards for multi-solution tasks, and the difficulty of synergizing techniques. We introduce STAR: Similarity-guided Teacher-Assisted Refinement, a novel holistic framework that effectively transfers LLMs' capabilities to super-tiny models. STAR consists of two core technical innovations: (1) Constrained Knowledge Distillation (CKD), a training objective that augments top-k forward KL divergence to suppress confidently incorrect predictions, ensuring training stability while preserving exploration capacity for downstream RL. STAR holistically synergizes these strategies within a cohesive training curriculum, enabling super-tiny models to achieve exceptional performance on complex function calling tasks; (2) Similarity-guided RL (Sim-RL), a RL mechanism that introduces a fine-grained, similarity-based reward. This provides a robust, continuous, and rich signal for better policy optimization by evaluating the similarity between generated outputs and the ground truth. Extensive experiments on challenging and renowned benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. Our STAR models establish SOTA in their size classes, significantly outperforming baselines. Remarkably, our 0.6B STAR model achieves the best performance among all open models under 1B, surpassing even several well-known open models at a larger scale. STAR demonstrates a training framework that distills capabilities of LLMs into super-tiny models, paving the way for powerful, accessible, and efficient AI agents.

Applications · Language, Speech and Dialog

Yueqi Song, Ketan Ramaneti, Zaid Sheikh, Ziru Chen, Boyu Gou, Tianbao Xie, Yiheng Xu, Danyang Zhang, Apurva Gandhi, Fan Yang 等

Public research results on large-scale supervised finetuning of AI agents remain relatively rare, since the collection of agent training data presents unique challenges. In this work, we argue that the bottleneck is not a lack of underlying data sources, but that a large variety of data is fragmented across heterogeneous formats, tools, and interfaces. To this end, we introduce the Agent Data Protocol (ADP), a light-weight representation language that serves as an "interlingua" between agent datasets in diverse formats and unified agent training pipelines downstream. The design of ADP is expressive enough to capture a large variety of tasks, including API/tool use, browsing, coding, software engineering, and general agentic workflows, while remaining simple to parse and train on without engineering at a per-dataset level. In experiments, we unified a broad collection of 13 existing agent training datasets into ADP format, and converted the standardized ADP data into training-ready formats for multiple agent frameworks. We performed supervised finetuning on the unified data, and demonstrated an average performance gain of $\sim$20\% over corresponding base models, and delivers state-of-the-art or near-SOTA performance on standard coding, browsing, tool use, and research benchmarks, without domain-specific tuning. All code and data are released publicly, in the hope that ADP could help lower the barrier to standardized, scalable, and reproducible agent training.

Applications · Language, Speech and Dialog

Arkadiy Saakyan, Najoung Kim, Smaranda Muresan, Tuhin Chakrabarty

$N$-gram novelty is widely used to evaluate language models' ability to generate text outside of their training data. More recently, it has also been adopted as a metric for measuring textual creativity. However, theoretical work on creativity suggests that this approach may be inadequate, as it does not account for creativity's dual nature: novelty (how original the text is) and appropriateness (how sensical and pragmatic it is). We investigate the relationship between this notion of creativity and $n$-gram novelty through 8,618 expert writer annotations of novelty, pragmaticality, and sensicality via \emph{close reading} of human- and AI-generated text. We find that while $n$-gram novelty is positively associated with expert writer-judged creativity, approximately 91% of top-quartile $n$-gram novel expressions are not judged as creative, cautioning against relying on $n$-gram novelty alone. Furthermore, unlike in human-written text, higher $n$-gram novelty in open-source LLMs correlates with lower pragmaticality. In an exploratory study with frontier closed-source models, we additionally confirm that they are less likely to produce creative expressions than humans. Using our dataset, we test whether zero-shot, few-shot, and finetuned models are able to identify expressions perceived as novel by experts (a positive aspect of writing) or non-pragmatic (a negative aspect). Overall, frontier LLMs exhibit performance much higher than random but leave room for improvement, especially struggling to identify non-pragmatic expressions. We further find that LLM-as-a-Judge novelty ratings align with expert writer preferences in an out-of-distribution dataset, more so than an n-gram based metric.

Social Aspects · Fairness, Equity, Justice and Safety

Jackson Kaunismaa, John Hughes, Christina Knight, Avery Griffin, Mrinank Sharma, Erik Jones

Model developers implement safeguards in frontier models to prevent misuse, for example, by employing classifiers to filter dangerous outputs. In this work, we demonstrate that even robustly safeguarded models can be used to elicit harmful capabilities in open-source models through \textit{elicitation attacks}. Our elicitation attacks consist of three stages: (i) constructing prompts in adjacent domains to a target harmful task that do not request dangerous information; (ii) obtaining responses to these prompts from safeguarded frontier models; (iii) fine-tuning open-source models on these prompt-output pairs. Since the requested prompts cannot be used to directly cause harm, they are not refused by frontier model safeguards. We evaluate these elicitation attacks within the domain of hazardous chemical synthesis and processing, and demonstrate that our attacks recover approximately 40\% of the capability gap between the base open-source model and an unrestricted frontier model. We then show that the efficacy of elicitation attacks scales with the capability of the frontier model and the amount of generated fine-tuning data. Our work demonstrates the challenge of mitigating ecosystem level risks with output-level safeguards.

Applications · Language, Speech and Dialog

Siyuan Wang, Yanchen Liu, Xiang Ren

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) achieve strong reasoning performance by generating long chains of thought (CoTs), yet only a small fraction of these traces meaningfully contributes to answer prediction, while the majority contains repetitive or truncated content. Such output redundancy is further propagated after supervised finetuning (SFT), as models learn to imitate verbose but uninformative patterns, which can degrade performance. To this end, we incorporate integrated gradient attribution to quantify each token's influence on final answers and aggregate them into two segment-level metrics: (1) \textit{attribution strength} measures the overall attribution magnitude; and (2) \textit{direction consistency} captures whether tokens' attributions within a segment are uniformly positive or negative (high consistency), or a mixture of both (moderate consistency). Based on these two metrics, we propose a segment-level selective learning framework to identify important segments with high attribution strength but moderate consistency that indicate reflective rather than shallow reasoning. The framework then applies selective SFT on these important segments while masking loss for unimportant ones. Experiments across multiple models and datasets show that our approach improves accuracy and output efficiency, enabling more effective learning from long reasoning traces.

Applications · Language, Speech and Dialog

Ran Xu, Jingjing Chen, Jiayu Ye, Yu Wu, Jun Yan, Carl Yang, Hongkun Yu

Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used as judges to evaluate response quality, providing a scalable alternative to human evaluation. However, most LLM judges operate solely on intrinsic text-based reasoning, limiting their ability to verify complex constraints or perform accurate computation. Motivated by the success of tool-integrated reasoning (TIR) in numerous tasks, we propose TIR-Judge, an end-to-end RL framework for training LLM judges that integrates a Python executor for precise evaluation. TIR-Judge is built on three principles: (i) diverse training across verifiable and non-verifiable domains, (ii) flexible judgment formats (pointwise, pairwise, listwise), and (iii) iterative RL that enables bootstrapping directly from a base model without distillation. On six public benchmarks, TIR-Judge surpasses strong reasoning-based judges by up to 6.4% (pointwise) and 7.7% (pairwise), and achieves listwise performance comparable to Claude-Opus-4 despite having only 8B parameters. Remarkably, TIR-Judge-Zero—trained entirely without distillation—matches the performance of the distilled variants, showing that tool-augmented judges can self-improve through iterative reinforcement learning.

Applications · Language, Speech and Dialog

Rocky Klopfenstein, Yang He, Andrew Tremante, Yuepeng Wang, Nina Narodytska, Haoze Wu

Community-driven Text-to-SQL evaluation platforms play a pivotal role in tracking the state of the art of Text-to-SQL performance. The reliability of the evaluation process is critical for driving progress in the field. Current evaluation methods are largely test-based, which involves comparing the execution results of a generated SQL query and a human-labeled ground-truth on a static test database. Such an evaluation is optimistic, as two queries can coincidentally produce the same output on the test database while actually being different. In this work, we propose a new alternative evaluation pipeline, called SpotIt, where a formal bounded equivalence verification engine actively searches for a database that differentiates the generated and ground-truth SQL queries. We develop techniques to extend existing verifiers to support a richer SQL subset relevant to Text-to-SQL. A performance evaluation of ten Text-to-SQL methods on the high-profile BIRD dataset suggests that test-based methods can often overlook differences between the generated query and the ground-truth. Further analysis of the verification results reveals a more complex picture of the current Text-to-SQL evaluation.