论文检索

Qiyao Sun, Xingming Li, Xixiang He, Ao Cheng, Xuanyu Ji, Hailun Lu, Runke Huang, Qingyong Hu

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in various natural language processing tasks, yet they remain prone to generating factually incorrect outputs—known as "hallucinations". While recent approaches have shown promise for hallucination detection by repeatedly sampling from LLMs and quantifying the semantic inconsistency among the generated responses, they rely on fixed sampling budgets that fail to adapt to query complexity, resulting in computational inefficiency. We propose an Adaptive Bayesian Estimation framework for Semantic Entropy with Guided Semantic Exploration, which dynamically adjusts sampling requirements based on observed uncertainty. Our approach employs a hierarchical Bayesian framework to model the semantic distribution, enabling dynamic control of sampling iterations through variance-based thresholds that terminate generation once sufficient certainty is achieved. We also develop a perturbation-based importance sampling strategy to systematically explore the semantic space. Extensive experiments on four QA datasets demonstrate that our method achieves superior hallucination detection performance with significant efficiency gains. In low-budget scenarios, our approach requires about 50% fewer samples to achieve comparable detection performance to existing methods, while delivers an average AUROC improvement of 12.6% under the same sampling budget.

Chenghao Sun, Zhen Huang, Yonggang Zhang, Xinmei Tian, Xu Shen, Jieping Ye

Large language models (LLMs) present a paradox: they can correctly answer a multi-hop factual query in a high-resource language like English, yet fail on the identical query in another language. This raises a fundamental question about the nature of multilingual knowledge: are facts missing, or merely inaccessible? The underlying mechanisms for this knowledge gap have remained largely unexplored. In this work, we resolve this question by introducing a mechanistic interpretability framework that traces the causal pathways of multi-hop knowledge reasoning. Our analysis reveals a core, non-obvious finding: cross-lingual inconsistencies do not stem from a knowledge deficit. Instead, factual knowledge is robustly stored in a set of **shared, language-agnostic semantic neurons**. The failure originates from **misaligned attention pathways**, where a common set of critical attention heads fails to correctly route information along the reasoning chain to the appropriate knowledge neurons in lower-resource languages. This mechanistic diagnosis motivates a targeted alignment strategy: a surgical fine-tuning of only these critical heads. Experiments demonstrate that our method achieves significant improvements in multilingual multi-hop factuality—with positive cross-lingual transfer—while uniquely preserving general model capabilities, offering a scalable and mechanistically-grounded approach to building more reliable multilingual models.

Vy Nguyen, Ziqi Xu, Jeffrey Chan, Estrid He, Feng Xia, Xiuzhen Zhang

Large Language Models (LLMs) often produce fluent but factually incorrect responses, a phenomenon known as hallucination. Abstention, where the model chooses not to answer and instead outputs phrases such as "I don't know", is a common safeguard. However, existing abstention methods typically rely on post-generation signals, such as generation variations or feedback, which limits their ability to prevent unreliable responses in advance. In this paper, we introduce Aspect-Based Causal Abstention (ABCA), a new framework that enables early abstention by analysing the internal diversity of LLM knowledge through causal inference. This diversity reflects the multifaceted nature of parametric knowledge acquired from various sources, representing diverse aspects such as disciplines, legal contexts, or temporal frames. ABCA estimates causal effects conditioned on these aspects to assess the reliability of knowledge relevant to a given query. Based on these estimates, we enable two types of abstention: Type-1, where aspect effects are inconsistent (knowledge conflict), and Type-2, where aspect effects consistently support abstention (knowledge insufficiency). Experiments on standard benchmarks demonstrate that ABCA improves abstention reliability, achieves state-of-the-art performance, and enhances the interpretability of abstention decisions.

Manh Nguyen, Sunil Gupta, Hung Le

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong performance across various natural language processing (NLP) tasks but remain vulnerable to hallucinations, generating factually incorrect or misleading outputs. Uncertainty estimation, often using predictive entropy estimation, is key to addressing this issue. However, existing methods often require multiple samples or extra computation to assess semantic entropy. This paper proposes an efficient, training-free uncertainty estimation method that approximates predictive entropy using the responses' top-K probabilities. Moreover, we employ an adaptive mechanism to determine K to enhance flexibility and filter out low-confidence probabilities. Experimental results on three free-form question-answering datasets across several LLMs demonstrate that our method outperforms expensive state-of-the-art baselines, contributing to the broader goal of enhancing LLM trustworthiness.

Wenxuan Mu, Jinzhong Ning, Di Zhao, Yijia Zhang

In-context learning (ICL) with large language models (LLMs) has emerged as a promising paradigm for named entity recognition (NER) in low-resource scenarios. However, existing ICL-based NER methods suffer from three key limitations: (1) reliance on dynamic retrieval of annotated examples, which is problematic when annotated data is scarce; (2) limited generalization to unseen domains due to the LLM's insufficient internal domain knowledge; and (3) failure to incorporate external knowledge or resolve entity ambiguities. To address these challenges, we propose KDR-Agent, a novel multi-agent framework for multi-domain low-resource in-context NER that integrates Knowledge retrieval, Disambiguation, and Reflective analysis. KDR-Agent leverages natural-language type definitions and a static set of entity-level contrastive demonstrations to reduce dependency on large annotated corpora. A central planner coordinates specialized agents to (i) retrieve factual knowledge from Wikipedia for domain-specific mentions, (ii) resolve ambiguous entities via contextualized reasoning, and (iii) reflect on and correct model predictions through structured self-assessment. Experiments across ten datasets from five domains demonstrate that KDR-Agent significantly outperforms existing zero-shot and few-shot ICL baselines across multiple LLM backbones.

Shibing Mo, Haoyang Ruan, Kai Wu, Jing Liu

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable generalization capabilities, but aligning their outputs with human preferences typically requires expensive supervised fine-tuning. Recent test-time methods leverage textual feedback to overcome this, but they often critique and revise a single candidate response, lacking a principled mechanism to systematically analyze, weigh, and synthesize the strengths of multiple promising candidates. Such a mechanism is crucial because different responses may excel in distinct aspects (e.g., clarity, factual accuracy, or tone), and combining their best elements may produce a far superior outcome. This paper proposes the Textual Self-Attention Network (TSAN), a new paradigm for test-time preference optimization that requires no parameter updates. TSAN emulates self-attention entirely in natural language to overcome this gap: it analyzes multiple candidates by formatting them into textual keys and values, weighs their relevance using an LLM-based attention module, and synthesizes their strengths into a new, preference-aligned response under the guidance of the learned textual attention. This entire process operates in a textual gradient space, enabling iterative and interpretable optimization. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that with just three test-time iterations on a base SFT model, TSAN outperforms supervised models like Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct and surpasses the current state-of-the-art test-time alignment method by effectively leveraging multiple candidate solutions.

Xiaonan Luo, Yue Huang, Ping He, Xiangliang Zhang

High‑quality Question–Answer (QA) datasets are foundational for reliable Large Language Model (LLM) evaluation, yet even expert‑crafted datasets exhibit persistent gaps in domain coverage, misaligned difficulty distributions, and factual inconsistencies. The recent surge in generative model-powered datasets has compounded these quality challenges. In this work, we introduce RefineLab, the first LLM‑driven framework that automatically refines raw QA textual data into high-quality datasets under a controllable token‑budget constraint. RefineLab takes a set of target quality attributes as refinement objectives and performs selective edits within a predefined token budget to ensure practicality and efficiency. In essence, RefineLab addresses a constrained optimization problem: improving the quality of QA samples as much as possible while respecting resource limitations. With a set of available refinement operations, RefineLab takes as input the original dataset, a specified set of target quality dimensions, and a token budget, and determines which refinement operations should be applied to each QA sample. This process is guided by an assignment module that selects optimal refinement strategies to maximize overall dataset quality while adhering to the budget constraint. Experiments demonstrate that RefineLab consistently narrows divergence from expert datasets across coverage, difficulty alignment, factual fidelity, and distractor quality. RefineLab pioneers a scalable, customizable path to reproducible dataset design, with broad implications for LLM evaluation.

Shuyi Liu, Yu-Ming Shang, Xi Zhang

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a powerful framework for enhancing the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) by integrating retrieval-based methods with generative models. As external knowledge repositories continue to expand and the parametric knowledge within models becomes outdated, a critical challenge for RAG systems is resolving conflicts between retrieved external information and LLMs' internal knowledge, which can significantly compromise the accuracy and reliability of generated content. However, existing approaches to conflict resolution typically operate at the token or semantic level, often leading to fragmented and partial understanding of factual discrepancies between LLMs' knowledge and context, particularly in knowledge-intensive tasks. To address this limitation, we propose TruthfulRAG, the first framework that leverages Knowledge Graphs (KGs) to resolve factual-level knowledge conflicts in RAG systems. Specifically, TruthfulRAG constructs KGs by systematically extracting triples from retrieved content, utilizes query-based graph retrieval to identify relevant knowledge, and employs entropy-based filtering mechanisms to precisely locate conflicting elements and mitigate factual inconsistencies, thereby enabling LLMs to generate faithful and accurate responses. Extensive experiments reveal that TruthfulRAG outperforms existing methods, effectively alleviating knowledge conflicts and improving the robustness and trustworthiness of RAG systems.

Kewei Liao, Tianbo Wang, Yuqing Ma, Zhange Zhang, Zhicheng Geng, Xiaowei Zhao, Jiakai Wang, Xianglong Liu

Hallucination has emerged as a pivotal challenge of Large Language Models (LLMs) that generate plausible yet non‑factual content, significantly impeding the trustworthy AI applications in real-world scenarios like medical diagnosis and autonomous driving. Editing the internal activations of LLMs during inference has shown promising effectiveness in mitigating hallucinations with minimal cost. However, previous editing approaches neglect the query‑specific inference pathways that require tailored truthful steering vectors, resulting in suboptimal hallucination mitigation. To address these issues, we propose the Query-Routed Activation Editing (QRAE) framework, which comprises Divergence-sensitive Head Routing (DHR) and Truth-hierarchical Preference Steering (TPS), to fully leverage query-specific semantics for adaptive activation editing. Specifically, DHR is proposed to establish a query-aware head selection criterion, thereby dynamically routing to truth-critical attention heads. Subsequently, TPS introduces a query-specific steering vector calibration policy with the guidance of progressive truth-preferred optimization, enabling precise and adaptive editing for each distinct query. Extensive experiments on the widely recognized TruthfulQA benchmark demonstrate that QRAE outperforms SOTA methods by up to 13.2% in MC1. Meanwhile, QRAE demonstrates strong generalization to out-of-distribution TriviaQA and Natural Questions benchmarks.

Xiaomin Li, Zhou Yu, Ziji Zhang, Yingying Zhuang, Swair Shah, Narayanan Sadagopan, Anurag Beniwal

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across diverse tasks by encoding vast amounts of factual knowledge. However, they are still prone to hallucinations, generating incorrect or misleading information, often accompanied by high uncertainty. Existing methods for hallucination detection primarily focus on quantifying internal uncertainty, which arises from missing or conflicting knowledge within the model. However, hallucinations can also stem from external uncertainty, where ambiguous user queries lead to multiple possible interpretations. In this work, we introduce **Semantic Volume**, a novel mathematical measure for quantifying both external and internal uncertainty in LLMs. Our approach perturbs queries and responses, embeds them in a semantic space, and computes the Gram matrix determinant of the embedding vectors, capturing their dispersion as a measure of uncertainty. Our framework provides a generalizable and unsupervised uncertainty detection method without requiring internal access to LLMs. We conduct extensive experiments on both external and internal uncertainty detections, demonstrating that our Semantic Volume method consistently outperforms existing baselines in both tasks. Additionally, we provide theoretical insights linking our measure to differential entropy, unifying and extending previous sampling-based uncertainty measures such as the semantic entropy. Semantic Volume is shown to be a robust and interpretable approach to improving the reliability of LLMs by systematically detecting uncertainty in both user queries and model responses.

Shike Li, Xiaokai Wang, Xiaofeng Liu, Xin Tong, Hu Zhang

Large language models (LLMs) frequently generate fluent yet factually inaccurate content, a phenomenon known as hallucination. Recent inference-time approaches aim to improve truthfulness by steering model activations toward semantically meaningful directions. While effective to some extent, these methods typically process activations independently, neglecting the internal coordination structure of multi-head attention (MHA), where attention heads interact to form semantic representations. In this work, we propose CoFact, an adaptive inference-time mechanism that improves factual consistency by dynamically coordinating attention head behaviors. Inspired by cooperative game theory, CoFact conceptualizes attention heads as collaborative agents. It models the semantic utility and redundancy of each head and adaptively modulates their contributions to the final attention output. Notably, rather than directly altering intermediate representations, CoFact performs token-level coordination to encourage diverse and complementary attention patterns across heads. CoFact is plug-and-play compatible with mainstream LLM architectures and requires no additional supervision or model retraining. Experimental results across multiple standard factuality benchmarks demonstrate that CoFact consistently enhances factual accuracy while maintaining generation fluency.

Yanli Hu, Teng Liu, Zhuangyi Zhou, Weixin Zeng, Zhen Tan, Xiang Zhao

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances large language models (LLMs) with external knowledge retrieval, improving factual accuracy and knowledge coverage. However, existing RAG approaches face a fundamental trade-off when handling complex reasoning: while traditional iterative retrieval methods offer flexibility, their local perspective limits their ability to establish global knowledge connections. In contrast, structure-augmented RAG methods capture global relationships but incur significant construction costs. To fill in this gap, we propose MGranRAG, an innovative framework designed to integrate precise local retrieval with structured global reasoning. Our approach circumvents expensive semantic extraction by employing a lightweight contextual hierarchical graph, effectively combining the local adaptability of iterative retrieval with the global consistency of structured knowledge. The framework adopts a novel iterative optimization scheme: at the local level, the LLM identifies multi-granular contextual evidence, such as key sentences and phrases, within retrieved passages to refine retrieval. At the global level, these multi-granularity evidence nodes are then mapped and propagated within the structured hierarchical graph, enabling the diffusion of rich contextual information at different levels to introduce global semantic constraints and reorder retrieval results. This coordination between local and global iterative processes dynamically balances retrieval accuracy and contextual coherence. Experimental results on challenging multi-hop and open-domain question answering datasets show that our proposal achieves new state-of-the-art performance in both retrieval and answer accuracy.

Jiaxin Guo, Hao Sun, Wenhao Zhang, Xuanbo Fan, Yan Zhang

Knowledge editing (KE) has emerged as an effective approach for updating factual information in large language models (LLMs) without the need for full retraining. Most of the existing methods for addressing the "ripple effect" in KE adopt a chain-structured reasoning process, making them vulnerable to error accumulation from early incorrect steps. Moreover, their conflict detection mechanisms are often susceptible to the LLM's inherent confirmation bias, further undermining the reliability of the editing process. To overcome these challenges, we propose Tree of Editing (ToE), a tree-structured, retrieval-enhanced knowledge editing framework designed to support robust reasoning under factual updates. ToE expands reasoning paths using a breadth-first strategy combined with score-guided beam search, enabling diverse and error-tolerant inference. Besides, we introduce an observer to objectively update knowledge, avoiding the bias caused by LLMs' over-confidence. Experimental results on two benchmarks, namely MQuAKE-CF (targeting ripple-aware editing) and DUNE (free-form editing), demonstrate that ToE framework significantly outperforms existing methods.

Xuanbo Fan, Tianqi Zhao, Yi Cheng, Chi Xiu, Jiaxin Guo, Boci Peng, Bingjing Xu, Jessica Zhang, Feng Sun, Yan Zhang

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) improves the factual accuracy of large language models by grounding responses in external content. However, most RAG systems assume access to static and well-organized corpora with fixed retrieval logic. In practice, real-world sources are heterogeneous and unlabeled, including user-uploaded documents, manuals, and datasets. Effective access in such settings requires adaptive and self-directed retrieval behavior. We present SegMem‑RAG, a memory-augmented RAG framework that learns to route queries across multiple unlabeled corpora based on experience. It incrementally updates a structured memory and uses self-reflection to guide retrieval over time without supervision. Experimental results demonstrate that SegMem‑RAG significantly outperforms recent baselines in generation quality on multi-corpus QA tasks.

Yexing Du, Kaiyuan Liu, Youcheng Pan, Zheng Chu, Bo Yang, Xiaocheng Feng, Ming Liu, Yang Xiang

As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly popularized in the multilingual world, ensuring hallucination-free factuality becomes markedly crucial. However, existing benchmarks for evaluating the reliability of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) predominantly focus on textual or visual modalities with a primary emphasis on English, which creates a gap in evaluation when processing multilingual input, especially in speech. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel Cross-lingual and Cross-modal Factuality benchmark (CCFQA). Specifically, the CCFQA benchmark contains parallel speech-text factual questions across 8 languages, designed to systematically evaluate MLLMs' cross-lingual and cross-modal factuality capabilities. Our experimental results demonstrate that current MLLMs still face substantial challenges on the CCFQA benchmark. Furthermore, we propose a few-shot transfer learning strategy that effectively transfers the Question Answering (QA) capabilities of LLMs in English to multilingual Spoken Question Answering (SQA) tasks, achieving competitive performance with GPT-4o-mini-Audio using just 5-shot training. We release CCFQA as a foundational research resource to promote the development of MLLMs with more robust and reliable speech understanding capabilities.

Jonghyeon Choi, Yeonjun Choi, Hyun-chul Kim, Beakcheol Jang

This paper provides an early effort to systematically examine nation-level biases exhibited by Large Language Models (LLMs) within the domain of International Relations (IR), a dimension that has remained largely unexplored in prior research. Leveraging historical records from the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), we developed a bias evaluation framework comprising three distinct tests to explore nation-level bias in various LLMs, with a particular focus on the five permanent members of the UNSC. Experimental results show that, even with the general bias patterns across models (e.g., favorable biases toward the western nations, and unfavorable biases toward Russia), these still vary based on the LLM. Notably, even within the same LLM, the direction and magnitude of bias for a nation change depending on the evaluation context. This observation suggests that LLM biases are fundamentally multidimensional, varying across models and tasks. We also observe that models with stronger reasoning abilities show reduced bias and better prediction performance. Building on this finding, we introduce a debiasing framework that improves LLMs’ factual reasoning combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Reflexion-based self-reflection techniques. Experiments show it effectively reduces nation-level bias, and improves performance, particularly in GPT-4o-mini and LLama-3.3-70B. Our findings emphasize the need to assess nation-level bias alongside prediction performance when applying LLMs in the IR domain.

Xuanqi Chen, Ziying Rong, Xinfeng Liao, Yiqian Wu, Bowei Zhang, Pengfei Fu, Shengyi Jiang

Multimodal summarization with multimodal output (MSMO) aims to generate coherent textual summaries while selecting the most semantically relevant images to enhance expressiveness. Despite the advancements of large multimodal models like GPT-4o, LLaMA-3, and Grok-3, these models often exhibit hallucination and weak visual-text alignment when applied to MSMO tasks. To address these challenges, we propose ModalSyncSum, a unified framework that enhances semantic consistency and visual faithfulness. It incorporates image-aware information extraction to mitigate visual-text misalignment, QA-based description verification to detect and correct hallucinated image descriptions, and named entity-guided refinement to ensure factual accuracy and entity alignment across modalities. Furthermore, we introduce a new evaluation metric M3AS, which jointly considers image content coverage, text-image alignment, and summary consistency, filling the gap in evaluating multimodal summary quality. Experimental results show that our model outperforms prompt-based baselines across multiple datasets, achieving significant gains on ROUGE, BLEU, and BERTScore, with BLEU improving by 21.95%. In human evaluation, M3AS exhibits stronger correlation with human judgments in consistency, image-summary relevance, and focus, surpassing existing automatic metrics.

Shengyuan Chen, Chuang Zhou, Zheng Yuan, Qinggang Zhang, Zeyang Cui, Hao Chen, Yilin Xiao, Jiannong Cao, Xiao Huang

Large language models (LLMs) often suffer from hallucination, generating factually incorrect statements when handling questions beyond their knowledge and perception. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) addresses this by retrieving query-relevant contexts from knowledge bases to support LLM reasoning. Recent advances leverage pre-constructed graphs to capture the relational connections among distributed documents, showing remarkable performance in complex tasks. However, existing Graph-based RAG (GraphRAG) methods rely on a costly process to transform the corpus into a graph, introducing overwhelming token cost and update latency. Moreover, real-world queries vary in type and complexity, requiring different logic structures for accurate reasoning. The pre-built graph may not align with these required structures, resulting in ineffective knowledge retrieval. To this end, we propose a Logic-aware Retrieval Augmented Generation framework (LogicRAG) that dynamically extracts reasoning structures at inference time to guide adaptive retrieval without any pre-built graph. LogicRAG begins by decomposing the input query into a set of subproblems and constructing a directed acyclic graph (DAG) to model the logical dependencies among them. To support coherent multi-step reasoning, LogicRAG then linearizes the graph using topological sort, so that subproblems can be addressed in a logically consistent order. Besides, LogicRAG applies graph pruning to reduce redundant retrieval and uses context pruning to filter irrelevant context, significantly reducing the overall token cost. Extensive experiments demonstrate that LogicRAG achieves both superior performance and efficiency compared to state-of-the-art baselines.

Ling-Chun Chen, Hsi-Wen Chen, Ming-Syan Chen

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across reasoning and knowledge-intensive tasks, yet their static pretraining leaves them unable to handle rapidly evolving or domain-specific knowledge. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses this by grounding LLM outputs in dynamically retrieved evidence, improving factual accuracy and reducing hallucinations. However, standard RAG pipelines struggle with temporally sensitive queries, especially when documents contain fuzzy or indirect time expressions (e.g., “a few years later”). This leads to Temporal Misalignment, where topically relevant but temporally incorrect results are retrieved. To overcome this, we propose DeFuzzRAG, a lightweight framework that enhances temporal robustness in RAG. DeFuzzRAG employs a small local language model to infer concrete time scopes from vague expressions and applies metadata-based filtering to realign retrieval with the query’s temporal intent. Experiments on a benchmark of fuzzified queries demonstrate that DeFuzzRAG substantially improves retrieval accuracy, raising Hit Rate by 15.7% while maintaining efficiency and model-agnostic integration. Our findings highlight the importance of temporal reasoning in RAG and establish DeFuzzRAG as a practical, plug-and-play solution for deploying temporally robust LLM systems in real-world settings.

Yixin Bu, Guanyun Zou, Renzhi Wang, Runze Xia, Cunjun Wang, Hongliang Dai, Xiaoqing Ma, Piji Li

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities in various complex language tasks, yet they face significant reliability challenges, including factual inaccuracies and generated biases. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) plays a pivotal role in assessing model trustworthiness, particularly for high-stakes applications. However, current UQ methods for LLMs encounter computational efficiency bottlenecks due to their reliance on extensive sampling or external model invocations. In this work, we introduce a novel, sampling-free uncertainty quantification framework centered on hidden layer representation analysis. Our method facilitates real-time uncertainty quantification by modeling hierarchical internal semantic dynamics during the generation process. Through comprehensive experiments on multiple QA datasets and diverse model scales, we show that our approach consistently outperforms existing uncertainty quantification techniques in distinguishing correct from incorrect generations. Our results reveal that analyzing the dynamic evolution of hidden states provides a potent and computationally efficient signal for uncertainty quantification, directly from the model's internal workings, surpassing methods that depend solely on output probabilities or approximations via multiple samples.