论文检索

Yaxin Zhao, Yang Wang, Wenya Guo, Sihan Xu, Xiangrui Cai, Xi Lin, Ying Zhang, Xiaojie Yuan

Weakly supervised video anomaly detection (WS-VAD) aims to localize frame-level anomalies using only video-level labels. This task is typically formulated within a multiple instance learning (MIL) paradigm, where each video is treated as a bag of snippets, achieving robust performance without requiring additional information.However, existing methods often struggle with noisy supervision signals. Normal snippets within abnormal bags are frequently misclassified as anomalies due to inaccurate anomaly scores. These misclassified instances act as noisy samples, introducing false supervision that hinders the learning of true anomaly patterns.In this work, we introduce D^ 2 MIL, a Denoising-Debiasing framework within the Multiple Instance Learning paradigm designed to suppress noise and improve anomaly discrimination. Our approach integrates two key components:(1) Denoising Module: We introduce a dynamic drop rate to adaptively filter out suspected noisy samples during training, based on the observation that noisy samples incur higher training losses. (2) Debiasing Module: We leverage a vision-language model to re-evaluate the discarded samples. This recovers potentially valuable abnormal instances that were mistakenly removed, as they are similar to noisy samples but difficult for the model to recognize. D^ 2 MIL is a general purpose denoising strategy that can be integrated into any MIL-based method. Our extensive experiments on the three benchmark datasets (ShanghaiTech, UCF-Crime, and MSAD) demonstrate that D^ 2 MIL is compatible with diverse MIL frameworks and consistently enhances their performance.

Sungrae Hong, Jiwon Jeong, Jisu Shin, Donghee Han, Sol Lee, Kyungeun Kim, Mun Yong Yi

Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for Whole Slide Image (WSI) diagnosis, offering effective learning with limited annotations. However, existing MIL frameworks overlook diagnostic priorities and fail to differentiate the severity of misclassifications in multiclass, leaving clinically critical errors unaddressed. We propose a mistake-severity-aware training strategy that organizes diagnostic classes into a hierarchical structure, with each level optimized using a severity-weighted cross-entropy loss that penalizes high-severity misclassifications more strongly. Additionally, hierarchical consistency is enforced through probabilistic alignment, a semantic feature remix applied to the instance bag to robustly train class priority and accommodate clinical cases involving multiple symptoms. An asymmetric Mikel's Wheel-based metric is also introduced to quantify the severity of errors specific to medical fields. Experiments on challenging public and real-world in-house datasets demonstrate that our approach significantly mitigates critical errors in MIL diagnosis compared to existing methods. We present additional experimental results on natural domain data to demonstrate the generalizability of our proposed method beyond medical contexts.

Maoyuan Shao, Yutong Gao, Xinyang Huang, Lijuan Sun, Guoshun Nan, Chuang Zhu

Vision-language models like CLIP have achieved remarkable progress in cross-modal representation learning, yet suffer from systematic misclassifications among visually and semantically similar categories. We observe that such confusion patterns are not random but persistently occur between specific category pairs, revealing the model's intrinsic bias and limited fine-grained discriminative ability. To address this, we propose CAPT, a Confusion-Aware Prompt Tuning framework that enables models to learn from their own misalignment. Specifically, we construct a Confusion Bank to explicitly model stable confusion relationships across categories and misclassified samples. On this basis, we introduce a Semantic Confusion Miner (SEM) to capture global inter-class confusion through semantic difference and commonality prompts, and a Sample Confusion Miner (SAM) to retrieve representative misclassified instances from the bank and capture sample-level cues through a Diff-Manner Adapter that integrates global and local contexts. To further unify confusion information across different granularities, a Multi-Granularity Difference Expert (MGDE) module is designed to jointly leverage semantic- and sample-level experts for more robust confusion-aware reasoning. Extensive experiments on 11 benchmark datasets demonstrate that our method significantly reduces confusion-induced errors while enhancing the discriminability and generalization of both base and novel classes, successfully resolving 50.72 percent of confusable sample pairs. Code will be released at https://github.com/greatest-gourmet/CAPT.

Yuetian Du, Yucheng Wang, Rongyu Zhang, Zhijie Xu, Boyu Yang, Ming Kong, Jie Liu, Qiang Zhu

Recent advances in Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have predominantly focused on enhancing visual \perception to improve \accuracy. However, a critical question remains unexplored: Do models know when they do not know? Through a probing experiment, we reveal a severe \confidence miscalibration problem in MLLMs. To address this, we propose Confidence-Driven Reinforcement Learning (CDRL), which uses original-noise image pairs and a novel confidence-based reward to enhance perceptual sensitivity and robustly calibrate the model's confidence. Beyond training benefits, calibrated confidence enables more effective test-time scaling as a free lunch. We further propose Confidence-Aware Test-Time Scaling (CA-TTS), which dynamically coordinates Self-Consistency, Self-Reflection, and Visual Self-Check modules guided by confidence signals. An Expert Model acts in multiple roles (e.g., Planner, Critic, Voter) to schedule these modules and provide external verification. Our integrated framework establishes new state-of-the-art results with consistent 8.8% gains across four benchmarks. More ablation studies demonstrate the effectiveness of each module and scaling superiority. Our code will be released after the acception.

Yue Wu, Tao Peng, Yongzhe Yuan, Kaiyuan Feng, Hao Li, Maoguo Gong, Qiguang Miao, Wenping Ma

With the growing accessibility of large-scale 3D point clouds from LiDAR and photogrammetric techniques, 3D change detection (3DCD) has become essential for understanding dynamic scenes. Existing methods typically formulate this as segmentation, treating each point independently for binary classification. This leads to isolated misclassified noise points inside regions. Meanwhile, feature similarity at boundaries causes boundary ambiguity. The more severe class imbalance inherent to change detection further exacerbates this issue. To address these challenges, we propose SRGCD, a Stability-Driven Region Growth Framework that redefines 3DCD as region growing rather than segmentation. Our key insight is that progressively expanding from highly confident seeds avoids pitfalls of point-wise classification while elegantly alleviating class imbalance. Specifically, we first apply strict constraints through Mutual Geometric Consistency Prior to identify minimal highly reliable unchanged seeds. From these seeds, Stability-Guided Controlled Attention modules progressively propagate stability from stable regions to neighboring uncertain points, enabling unchanged regions to grow layer-by-layer from interior cores toward boundaries. This coarse-to-fine growing process naturally forms coherent regions, avoiding isolated noise while achieving compact, well-defined boundaries through progressive expansion. Extensive experiments on the synthetic dataset Urb3DCD and the real-world dataset HKCD demonstrate that SRGCD achieves state-of-the-art performance, significantly improving interior completeness and boundary compactness over existing methods.

Shubhankar Borse, Farzad Farhadzadeh, Munawar Hayat, Fatih Porikli

State-of-the-art text-to-image models suffer from a persistent identity crisis when generating scenes with multiple humans: producing duplicate faces, merging identities, and miscounting individuals. We present DisCo (Reinforcement with Diversity Constraints), a reinforcement learning framework that directly optimizes identity diversity both within images and across groups of generated samples. DisCo fine-tunes flow-matching models using Group-Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), guided by a compositional reward that: (i) penalizes facial similarity within images, (ii) discourages identity repetition across samples, (iii) enforces accurate person counts, and (iv) preserves visual fidelity and prompt alignment via human preference scores. A single-stage curriculum stabilizes training as prompt complexity increases. Importantly, this method does not require any real data. On the DiverseHumans Testset, DisCo achieves 98.6% Unique Face Accuracy and near-perfect Global Identity Spread, outperforming open-source and proprietary models (e.g., Gemini, GPT-Image) while maintaining perceptual quality. Our results establish cross-sample diversity as a critical axis for resolving identity collapse, positioning DisCo as a scalable, annotation-free solution for multi-human image synthesis. Project page: https://qualcomm-ai-research.github.io/disco/.

Yansi Li, Gongshen Liu, Zhuosheng Zhang

Diffusion large language models (DLLMs) have emerged as a promising alternative to autoregressive (AR) generation, uniquely offering token-level probabilities under bidirectional context. However, the semantics of their native uncertainty estimates remain underexplored. In this work, we uncover a calibration paradox inherent to the bidirectional generation mechanism of state-of-the-art DLLMs. Concretely, we demonstrate that diffusion confidence is structurally distinct from AR likelihood. Notably, LLaDA-8B is highly miscalibrated (31.2% ECE) on mathematical reasoning benchmarks, yet possesses superior discriminative power (0.826 AUROC), significantly outperforming comparable AR baselines in single-pass settings (0.611 AUROC). We diagnose that this paradox arises because diffusion confidence functions less like a probability of correctness and more like a proxy for structural consistency enabled by the model’s bidirectional access to the entire solution path. We further show that lightweight post-hoc calibration can reconcile this gap, reducing ECE by over 60% while preserving the strong ranking signal. Our findings suggest that DLLMs offer a unique, cost-efficient uncertainty signal for reasoning tasks that complements expensive AR approaches.

Yanji He, Yuxin Jiang, Yiwen Wu, Bo Huang, Jiaheng Wei, Wei Wang

Large Language Models are increasingly deployed for decision-making, yet their adoption in high-stakes domains remains limited by miscalibrated probabilities, unfaithful explanations, and inability to incorporate expert knowledge precisely. We propose **IDEA**, a framework that extracts LLM decision knowledge into an interpretable parametric model over semantically meaningful factors. Through joint learning of verbal-to-numerical mappings and decision parameters via EM, correlated sampling that preserves factor dependencies, and direct parameter editing with mathematical guarantees, IDEA produces calibrated probabilities while enabling quantitative human-AI collaboration. Experiments across five datasets show IDEA with Qwen-3-32B (78.6%) outperforms DeepSeek R1 (68.1%) and GPT-5.2 (77.9%), achieving perfect factor exclusion and exact calibration—precision unattainable through prompting alone.

Cennet Oguz, Yasser Hamidullah, Josef van Genabith, Simon Ostermann

Evaluating factual correctness in procedural video captions is challenging because captions must reflect both the abstract procedural roles (e.g., actions, ingredients, tools, locations) and their visual execution. Existing evaluation metrics, which rely on lexical overlap or holistic semantic similarity, often miss role-specific omissions and misclassify visually present but task-irrelevant content as hallucinations. We introduce DualFact+, a role-aware, fact-level evaluation framework that distinguishes conceptual facts, encoding ontology-based role typing of procedural steps (Action, Object or Ingredient, Tool, Location), from contextual facts, encoding video-grounded predicate–argument relations that specify how these roles are instantiated during execution. To enable complete and role-consistent evaluation, DualFact+ incorporates visually grounded implicit arguments and contrastive fact sets, and operates in two complementary modes: DualFact-C for text-based verification and DualFact-V for video-grounded verification. Experiments on YouCook3-Fact and CraftBench-Fact show that state-of-the-art captioning models produce fluent but often incomplete descriptions with systematic role-level errors. DualFact+ achieves stronger correlation with human factuality judgments than standard lexical and embedding-based metrics, highlighting the importance of role-aware evaluation for procedural video understanding.

Sara Court, Lara Downing, Micha Elsner

This paper offers a call to action. We urge our colleagues in the research community to play a greater role in the articulation of our findings to the public. To illustrate the stakes we present a case study on the initial stages of an LLM-based machine translation application’s deployment in a real-world context: a text-2-911 system advertising capabilities in 55 languages for use in emergencies in which it may be difficult to call operators directly. We identify a number of common misconceptions about technologies such as these, concluding with a set of concrete recommendations and best practices for stakeholders at every stage of the development and deployment pipeline. While the advancement of scientific research often lies in solving the "hard" problems, we argue it is often the "easy" ones— problems for which the latest technology is often unnecessary— that are most overlooked.

Sraavya Sambara, Yuan Pu, Ayman Ali, Vishala Mishra, Lionel Wong, Monica Agrawal

Real-world health questions from patients often unintentionally embed false assumptions or premises. In such cases, safe medical communication typically involves redirection: addressing the implicit misconception and then responding to the underlying patient context, rather than the original question. While large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being used by lay users for medical advice, they have not yet been tested for this crucial competency. Therefore, in this work, we investigate how LLMs react to false premises embedded within real-world health questions. We develop a semi-automated pipeline to curate MedRedFlag, a dataset of 1100+ questions sourced from Reddit that require redirection. We then systematically compare responses from state-of-the-art LLMs to those from clinicians. Our analysis reveals that LLMs often fail to redirect problematic questions, even when the problematic premise is detected, and provide answers that could lead to suboptimal medical decision making. Our benchmark and results reveal a novel and substantial gap in how LLMs perform under the conditions of real-world health communication, highlighting critical safety concerns for patient-facing medical AI systems. Code and data are available at https://github.com/srsambara-1/MedRedFlag.

Hongye Liu, Dhanajit Brahma, Ricardo Henao

Recent advances in summary evaluation are based on model-based metrics to assess quality dimensions, such as completeness, conciseness, and faithfulness. However, these methods often require large language models, and predicted scores are frequently miscalibrated, limiting their reliability. Moreover, evaluating the average quality across different summaries for a single document typically requires access to multiple reference summaries. Here, we propose a general framework that generates individual and average proxy scores without relying on reference summaries, human annotations, or expensive model-based metrics. We also propose group isotonic regression binning (GIRB), a calibration method that adjusts the raw predictions to better align with ground-truth evaluation metrics. While we focus on continuous-value scenarios, such as summarization, the method is applicable to discrete-value tasks, such as question answering. Experiments on seven datasets demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms existing baselines.

Leo Hyun Park, Juwon Cho, Gyuhwan Kim, YoonDong Yeo, Taekyoung Kwon

Large Language Models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks despite extensive safety alignment. While automated red-teaming has emerged as a critical evaluation protocol, existing methods face two primary limitations: they largely explore homogeneous transformations in isolation, and they rely on brittle judgment metrics that frequently misclassify non-refusal hallucinations as successful attacks. In this paper, we reformulate jailbreak attacks as a compositional search problem guided by context-aware evaluation. We propose Chimera, a framework that generates compositional jailbreak attacks via judgment-driven search over heterogeneous strategies. Chimera systematically explores the combinatorial space of disjoint primitives, such as integrating technical obfuscation with semantic persuasion, under strict ordering constraints. Crucially, to drive the search process effectively, we introduce StrongREJECT++, a relevance-aware metric that eliminates false positive rewards by penalizing irrelevant responses. Experiments on multiple open-source and commercial LLMs show that Chimera uncovers qualitatively different vulnerability regions and consistently improves attack success rates and transferability compared to state-of-the-art baselines.

Mario Sanz-Guerrero, Manuel Mager, Katharina von der Wense

Prior work has shown that instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) are less well calibrated than their base pre-trained counterparts. However, little is known about the frequently used chat template’s effect on the calibration of conversational LLMs. In this work, we investigate the mechanisms driving this miscalibration by decoupling the effects of the post-training algorithm and the chat format. We find that, while instruction tuning fundamentally harms calibration, the chat template aggravates the issue through an “ownership bias” – models are significantly more confident in their *own* answers than in identical answers provided by a user. Extensive experiments across six recent open-weight LLMs, three benchmarks, and three confidence elicitation methods show that models assign up to 26% higher confidence to their own responses. Leveraging this insight, we propose a simple inference-time strategy: framing the model’s answer as user input during confidence elicitation. This approach significantly reduces overconfidence and improves calibration by up to 26% without the need for retraining, narrowing the gap between base and instruction-tuned models.

Qirui Liu, Hao Chen, Weijie Shi, Jiajie Xu, Jia Zhu

Accurately identifying student misconceptions is crucial for personalized education but faces three challenges: (1) data scarcity with long-tail distribution, where authentic student reasoning is difficult to synthesize; (2) fuzzy boundaries between error categories with high annotation noise; (3) deployment paradox—large models overlook unconventional approaches due to pretraining bias and cannot be deployed on edge, while small models overfit to noise. Unlike traditional methods that increase diversity through large-scale data synthesis, we propose a two-stage knowledge distillation framework that mines high-value samples from existing data. The first stage performs standard distillation to transfer task capabilities. The second stage introduces a dual-layer marginal selection mechanism based on cognitive uncertainty, identifying four types of critical samples based on teacher model uncertainty and confidence differences. For different data subsets, we design difficulty-adaptive mechanism to balance hard/soft label contributions, enabling student models to inherit inter-class relationships from teacher soft labels while distinguishing ambiguous error types. Experiments show that with augmented training on only 10.30% of filtered samples, we achieve MAP@3 of 0.9585 (+17.8%) on the MAP-Charting dataset, and using only a 4B parameter model, we attain 84.38% accuracy on cross-topic tests of middle school algebra misconception benchmarks, significantly outperforming sota LLM (67.73%) and standard fine-tuned 72B models (81.25%). Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/acl2026_map-5847/.

Viet Thanh Pham, Lizhen Qu, Zhuang Li, Gholamreza Haffari

Distributional alignment enables large language models (LLMs) to predict how a target population distributes its responses across answer options, rather than collapsing disagreement into a single consensus answer. However, existing LLM-based distribution prediction is often unstable and degrades under cultural and domain shift. Token score-based estimates can change with minor option wording or formatting, response sampling-based estimates are expensive and sensitive to prompts and decoding settings, and directly generated distributions are frequently miscalibrated.We propose Evi-DA, an evidence-based alignment technique that improves the fidelity and robustness of LLM-based distribution estimation under domain and cultural shift. Given a target country and a multiple-choice question, Evi-DA retrieves related World Values Survey items and their answer distributions, predicts a coarse Welzel value signature for each option, and infers the country-conditioned answer distribution in a structured format. We train the LLMs using a two-stage pipeline, where reinforcement learning optimizes survey-derived rewards that encourage accurate intermediate value predictions, faithful final distributions, well-formed structured outputs, and reduced cultural bias. Across in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks and multiple open-source backbones, Evi-DA reduces Jensen-Shannon divergence between predicted and gold distributions relative to strong baselines, with average relative improvements of up to 44%.

Zhiheng Li, Zongyang Ma, Yuntong Pan, Ziqi Zhang, Xiaolei Lv, Bo Li, Jun Gao, Jianing Zhang, Chunfeng Yuan, Bing Li 等

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly being deployed as automated content moderators. Within this landscape, we uncover a critical threat: Adversarial Smuggling Attacks. Unlike adversarial perturbations (for misclassification) and adversarial jailbreaks (for harmful output generation), adversarial smuggling exploits the Human-AI capability gap. It encodes harmful content into human-readable visual formats that remain AI-unreadable, thereby evading automated detection and enabling the dissemination of harmful content. We classify smuggling attacks into two pathways: (1) Perceptual Blindness, disrupting text recognition; and (2) Reasoning Blockade, inhibiting semantic understanding despite successful text recognition. To evaluate this threat, we constructed SmuggleBench, the first comprehensive benchmark comprising 1,700 adversarial smuggling attack instances. Evaluations on SmuggleBench reveal that both proprietary (e.g., GPT-5) and open-source (e.g., Qwen3-VL) SOTA models are vulnerable to this threat, producing Attack Success Rates (ASR) exceeding 90%. By analyzing the vulnerability through the lenses of perception and reasoning, we identify three root causes: the limited capabilities of vision encoders, the robustness gap in OCR, and the scarcity of domain-specific adversarial examples. We conduct a preliminary exploration of mitigation strategies, investigating the potential of test-time scaling (via CoT) and adversarial training (via SFT) to mitigate this threat.

Jiale Zhao, Ke Fang, Lu Cheng

Large language models (LLMs) often respond even when prompts omit critical details or include misleading information, leading to hallucinations or reinforced misconceptions. We study how to evaluate and improve LLMs’ ability to decide when and what to ask for clarification without sacrificing task performance. We introduce AskBench, an interactive benchmark that converts standard QA pairs into multi-turn interactions with explicit checkpoints. A unified judge loop evaluates final answers and simulates user responses as needed. AskBench covers two settings: AskMind, with intent-deficient queries requiring clarification, and AskOverconfidence, with queries containing false premises that must be identified and corrected. We further propose rubric-guided reinforcement learning with verifier-based rewards (RLVR), which uses structured rubrics to encourage targeted clarification. Experiments show consistent improvements in accuracy, rubric adherence, and interaction efficiency, with strong generalization to unseen domains.

Xinyan Guan, Jiali Zeng, Chunlei Xin, Yaojie Lu, Hongyu Lin, Xianpei Han, Le Sun, Fandong Meng

Large language models generate computationally expensive yet semantically void reasoning on beyond-capability tasks, creating safety risks where plausible-sounding but incorrect derivations mislead users. We characterize this futile reasoning phenomenon through systematic analysis, revealing universal capability overreach and systematic miscalibration towards over-confidence. The dominant failure mode is specious reasoning, superficially valid outputs with subtle hallucinations, which escalates with task difficulty. We demonstrate that prompt engineering proves insufficient to calibrate refusal behavior. To address this, we introduce CaRL (Capability-aligned Reinforcement Learning), which aligns model behavior with capability boundaries through reward shaping that incentivizes refusal over hallucination and hindsight augmentation that converts failures into refusal supervision. Experiments demonstrate a substantial reduction in futile reasoning while preserving performance across task difficulties, effectively achieving capability-aligned behavior without sacrificing utility.

Jiang Li, Zehua Duo, Guanglai Gao, Xiangdong Su

Causal reasoning is a crucial component of understanding complex phenomena and building intelligent systems. Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated their strong capabilities in reasoning tasks; however, their true understanding of causal relationships remains limited, particularly in cases where causal chains are misidentified or reliance on empirical inference occurs. To mitigate the risk that models misclassify data as false positives due to these issues, we introduce CausalityCheck, an automated tool designed to efficiently generate causal reasoning checklists. This checklist enables the creation of multi-task causal reasoning datasets with task generalization and reasoning robustness from a single causal reasoning dataset. Using CausalityCheck, we developed CausalityCheck-CP to assess the causal reasoning abilities of 18 LLMs. This framework also measures the extent to which causal chains are misidentified or rely on empirical inferences. Our results indicate that the current large language models still face two critical issues when handling complex causal reasoning tasks: incorrect identification of causal chains and reliance on empirical inference. The code and data are available at https://github.com/dzh597/CausalityCheck.