论文检索

Krishna Pothugunta, John P. Lalor

Recent work in NLP has probed large language models for their understanding of cultural norms across countries. However, this work typically considers distributional patterns, ignoring group consensus or possible multicultural environments within a country. In this work, we leverage cultural consensus theory (CCT) from cultural anthropology to model such multidimensional nuance. Applying CCT to the World Values Survey (WVS) across 10 countries and 12 domains, we demonstrate that models frequently misrepresent cultural structures by either failing to form cohesive consensus or severely over-regularizing consensus. Through explicit representation of intra-group variance, CCT provides actionable diagnostics to evaluate when models reflect true human diversity versus algorithmic homogenization.

Adir Rahamim, Asaf Yehudai, Boaz Carmeli, Leshem Choshen, Yosi Mass, Yonatan Belinkov

Model merging has emerged as a promising technique for combining multiple fine-tuned models into a single multitask model without retraining. However, the factors that determine whether merging will succeed or fail remain poorly understood. In this work, we investigate why specific models are merged better than others. To do so, we propose a concrete, measurable definition of mergeability. We investigate several potential causes for high or low mergeability, highlighting the base model knowledge as a dominant factor: Models fine-tuned on instances that the base model knows better are more mergeable than models fine-tuned on instances that the base model struggles with. Based on our mergeability definition, we explore a simple weighted merging technique that better preserves weak knowledge in the base model.

Seongheon Park, Changdae Oh, Hyeong Kyu Choi, Sean Du, Sharon Li

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) frequently hallucinate, limiting their safe deployment in real-world applications. Existing LLM self-evaluation methods rely on a model’s ability to estimate the correctness of its own outputs, which can improve deployment reliability; however, they depend heavily on language priors and are therefore ill-suited for evaluating vision-conditioned predictions. We propose VAUQ, a vision-aware uncertainty quantification framework for LVLM self-evaluation that explicitly measures how strongly a model’s output depends on visual evidence. VAUQ introduces the Image-Information Score (IS), which captures the reduction in predictive uncertainty attributable to visual input, and an unsupervised core-region masking strategy that amplifies the influence of salient regions. Combining predictive entropy with this core-masked IS yields a training-free scoring function that reliably reflects answer correctness. Comprehensive experiments show that VAUQ consistently outperforms existing self-evaluation methods across multiple datasets.

Radha Gulhane, Sathish Reddy Indurthi

Reinforcement learning optimization policies have traditionally relied on a single reward mechanism, most commonly a model-based reward. Such monolithic rewards often lack confidence calibration across domain-specific tasks and fail to capture diverse aspects of model responses. This approach requires extensive data annotation and reward model training, which is particularly challenging for multimodal models. In this work, we propose and provide a thorough study of hybrid reward and multi-aspect reward modeling. For accuracy and confidence calibration, we introduce a hybrid reward modeling framework that integrates complementary reward paradigms: model-based rewards, in which a learned reward model predicts scalar or vector scores, and rule-based reward, in which domain-specific heuristics provide explicit correctness signals with confidence. Beyond accuracy, we further incorporate multi-aspect rewards to enforce instruction adherence and introduce a generalized length-penalty reward to stabilize training and improve performance. Experiments demonstrate that this approach significantly enhances reasoning capabilities: our best-performing 3B model achieves an average improvement of ~9.5% across multimodal benchmarks, with a notable ~16% gain in mathematical reasoning tasks.

Ignacio Sastre, Aiala Rosá

We propose Concept Tokens, a lightweight method that adds a new special token to a pretrained LLM and learns only its embedding from multiple natural language definitions of a target concept, where occurrences of the concept are replaced by the new token. The LLM is kept frozen and the embedding is optimized with the standard language-modeling objective. We evaluate Concept Tokens in three settings. First, we study hallucinations in closed-book question answering on HotpotQA and find a directional effect: negating the hallucination token reduces hallucinated answers mainly by increasing abstentions, whereas asserting it increases hallucinations and lowers precision. Second, we induce recasting, a pedagogical feedback strategy for second language teaching, and observe the same directional effect. Moreover, compared to providing the full definitional corpus in-context, concept tokens better preserve compliance with other instructions (e.g., asking follow-up questions). Finally, we include a qualitative study with the Eiffel Tower and a fictional “Austral Tower” to illustrate what information the learned embeddings capture and where their limitations emerge. Overall, Concept Tokens provide a compact control signal learned from definitions that can steer behavior in frozen LLMs.

Mattia Ottoborgo, Daniele Rege Cambrin, Paolo Garza

Cooking recipes are complex procedures that require not only a fluent and factual text, but also accurate timing, temperature, and procedural coherence, as well as the correct composition of ingredients. Standard training procedures are primarily based on cross-entropy and focus solely on fluency. Building on RECIPE-NLG, we investigate the use of several composite objectives and present a new topological loss that represents ingredient lists as point clouds in embedding space, minimizing the divergence between predicted and gold ingredients. Using both standard NLG metrics and recipe-specific metrics, we find that our loss significantly improves ingredient- and action-level metrics. Meanwhile, the Dice loss excels in time/temperature precision, and the mixed loss yields competitive trade-offs with synergistic gains in quantity and time. A human preference analysis supports our finding, showing our model is preferred in 62% of the cases.

Gagan Bhatia, Hamdy Mubarak, Mustafa Jarrar, George Mikros, Fadi Zaraket, Mahmoud Alhirthani, Mutaz al-Khatib, Logan Cochrane, Kareem Mohamed Darwish, Rashid Yahiaoui 等

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for Islamic question answering, where ungrounded responses may carry serious religious consequences. Yet standard MCQ/MRC-style evaluations do not capture key real-world failure modes, notably free-form hallucinations and the ability to abstain when evidence is insufficient. To address this gap, we introduce IslamicFaithQA, a 3,810-item bilingual (Arabic/English) **generative** benchmark with atomic single-gold answers, which enables direct measurement of hallucination and abstention. We additionally developed an end-to-end grounded Islamic modeling suite consisting of *(i)* 25K Arabic text-grounded SFT reasoning pairs, *(ii)* 5K bilingual preference samples for reward-guided alignment, and *(iii)* a verse-level Qur’an retrieval corpus of \sim6k atomic *verses* (ayat). Building on these resources, we develop an agentic Quran-grounding framework (agentic RAG) that uses structured tool calls for iterative evidence seeking and answer revision. Experiments across Arabic-centric and multilingual LLMs show that retrieval improves correctness and that agentic RAG yields the largest gains beyond standard RAG, achieving state-of-the-art performance and stronger Arabic–English robustness even with a small model (i.e., Qwen3 4B). We made the datasets are publicly available (https://huggingface.co/datasets/QCRI/IslamicFaithQA).

Tamunotonye Harry, Ivoline C. Ngong, Chima Nweke, Yuanyuan Feng, Joseph Near

User interactions with language models vary due to static properties of the user (trait) and the specific context of the interaction (state). However, existing persona datasets (like PersonaChat, PANDORA etc.) capture only trait, and ignore the impact of state. We introduce Chameleon, a dataset of 5,001 contextual psychological profiles from 1,667 Reddit users, each measured across multiple contexts. Using the Chameleon dataset, we present three key findings. First, inspired by Latent State-Trait theory, we decompose variance and find that 74% is within-person (state) while only 26% is between-person (trait). Second, we find that LLMs are state-blind: they focus on trait only, and produce similar responses regardless of state. Third, we find that reward models react to user state, but inconsistently: different models favor or penalize the same users in opposite directions. We release Chameleon to support research on affective computing, personalized dialogue, and RLHF alignment.

Weizhi Zhang, Xinyang Zhang, Chenwei Zhang, Liangwei Yang, Jingbo Shang, Zhepei Wei, Henry Peng Zou, Zijie Huang, Zhengyang Wang, Yifan Gao 等

Large Language Model (LLM) empowered agents have recently emerged as advanced paradigms that exhibit impressive capabilities in a wide range of domains and tasks. Despite their potential, current LLM agents often adopt a one-size-fits-all approach, lacking the flexibility to respond to users’ varying needs and preferences. This limitation motivates us to develop PersonaAgent, the first personalized LLM agent framework designed to address versatile personalization tasks. Specifically, PersonaAgent integrates two complementary components: a personalized memory module that includes episodic and semantic memory mechanisms; a personalized action module that enables the agent to perform tool actions tailored to the user. At the core, the persona (defined as unique system prompt for each user) functions as an intermediary: it leverages insights from personalized memory to control agent actions, while the outcomes of these actions in turn refine the memory. Based on the framework, we propose a test-time user-preference alignment strategy that simulate the latest n interactions to optimize the persona prompt, ensuring real-time user preference alignment through textual loss feedback between simulated and ground-truth responses. Experimental evaluations demonstrate that PersonaAgent significantly outperforms other baseline methods by not only personalizing the action space effectively but also scaling during test-time real-world applications. These results underscore the feasibility and potential of our approach in delivering tailored, dynamic user experiences.

Mohsen Hariri, Alan Luo, Weicong Chen, Tianyi Zhang, Qifan Wang, Xiaotian Han, Vipin Chaudhary

Large Language Models (LLMs) suffer inference-time memory bottlenecks dominated by the attention Key-Value (KV) cache, which scales with model size and context length. While KV-cache quantization alleviates this cost, bit allocation between keys and values is often tuned heuristically, lacking theoretical grounding and generalizability. This paper proposes two theorems that anchor mixed-precision KV quantization in the intrinsic geometry of Transformer models. First, key weight matrices systematically have larger spectral and Frobenius norms than value matrices, implying higher information density along the key path. Second, for any given memory budget, prioritizing precision for keys over values strictly reduces quantization error and better preserves accuracy. Empirical evaluations across various prominent LLMs and benchmarks show that key-favored allocations (e.g., 4-bit keys, 2-bit values) retain up to 98.3% accuracy compared to uniform allocations (e.g., 4-bit for both), while conserving memory. These results transform bit allocation from ad hoc tuning into a theoretically grounded, geometry-driven design principle for efficient LLM inference. Source code is available at https://github.com/mohsenhariri/spectral-kv.

Zihan Liang, Ziwen Pan, Ruoxuan Xiong

Multimodal clinical records contain structured measurements and clinical notes recorded over time, offering rich temporal information about the evolution of patient health. Yet these observations are sparse, and whether they are recorded depends on the patient’s latent condition. Observation patterns also differ across modalities, as structured measurements and clinical notes arise under distinct recording processes. While prior work has developed methods that accommodate missingness in clinical time series, how to extract and use the information carried by the observation process itself remains underexplored. We therefore propose a patient representation learning framework for multimodal clinical time series that explicitly leverages informative missingness. The framework combines (1) a multimodal encoder that captures signals from structured and textual data together with their observation patterns, (2) a Bayesian filtering module that updates a latent patient state over time from observed multimodal signals, and (3) downstream modules for offline treatment policy learning and patient outcome prediction based on the learned patient state. We evaluate the framework on ICU sepsis cohorts from MIMIC-III, MIMIC-IV, and eICU. It improves both offline treatment policy learning and adverse outcome prediction, achieving FQE 0.679 versus 0.528 for clinician behavior and AUROC 0.886 for post-72-hour mortality prediction on MIMIC-III.

Dayeon Ki, Yu Hou, Rachel Rudinger, Hal Daumé Iii, Marine Carpuat, Fumeng Yang

Neologisms and emerging slang are central to daily conversation, yet challenging for non-native speakers (NNS) to interpret and use appropriately in cross-cultural communication with native speakers (NS). NNS increasingly make use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools to learn these words. We study the utility of such tools in mediating an informal communication scenario through a human-subjects study (N=234): NNS participants learn English neologisms with AI support, write messages using the learned word to an NS friend, and judge contextual appropriateness of the neologism in two provided writing samples. Using both NS evaluator-rated communicative competence of NNS-produced writing and NNS’ contextual appropriateness judgments, we compare three AI-based support conditions: AI Definition, AI Rewrite into simpler English, AI Explanation of meaning and usage, and Non-AI Dictionary for comparison. We show that AI Explanation yields the largest gains over no support in NS-rated competence, while contextual appropriateness judgments show indifference across support. NNS participants’ self-reported perceptions tend to overestimate NS ratings, revealing a mismatch between perceived and actual competence. We further observe a significant gap between NNS- and NS-produced writing, highlighting the limitations of current AI tools and informing design for future tools.

Seunghyun Park, Yuanyuan Lei

While LLMs demonstrate impressive reasoning capabilities, they remain fragile in multi-step logic deduction, where a single transition error can propagate through the entire reasoning chain, leading to unstable performance. In this work, we identify logical connectives as primary points of this structural fragility. Through empirical analysis, we show that logical connective tokens function as high entropy forking points, at which models frequently struggle to determine the correct logical direction. Motivated by this observation, we hypothesize that intervening in logical connective selection can guide LLMs towards the correct logical direction, thereby improving the overall reasoning chain. To validate this hypothesis, we propose a multi-layered framework that intervenes specifically at these logic-critical junctions in the reasoning process. Specifically, we introduce (1) Gradient-based Logical Steering to guide LLMs internal representations towards valid reasoning subspaces, (2) Localized Branching to resolve ambiguity via targeted look-ahead search, and (3) Targeted Transition Preference Optimization, a surgical reinforcement learning objective that selectively optimizes single-token preferences at logical pivots. Crucially, by concentrating intervention solely on logic-critical transitions, our framework achieves a favorable accuracy–efficiency trade-off compared to global inference time scaling methods like beam search and self-consistency.

Shengbo Gong, Xianfeng Tang, Qi He, Carl Yang, Wei Jin

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is critical for reducing hallucinations and incorporating external knowledge into Large Language Models (LLMs). However, advanced RAG systems face a trade-off between performance and efficiency. Multi-round RAG approaches achieve strong reasoning but incur excessive LLM calls and token costs, while Graph RAG methods suffer from computationally expensive, error-prone graph construction and retrieval redundancy. To address these challenges, we propose T^2RAG, a novel framework that operates on a simple, graph-free knowledge base of atomic triplets. T^2RAG leverages an LLM to decompose questions into searchable triplets with placeholders, which it then iteratively resolves by retrieving evidence from the triplet database. Empirical results show that T^2RAG significantly outperforms state-of-the-art multi-round and Graph RAG methods, achieving an average performance gain of up to 11% across six datasets while reducing retrieval costs by up to 45%.

Yunchong Huang, Gianni Barlacchi, Sandro Pezzelle

Large language models (LLMs) perform well on well-posed questions, yet standard question-answering (QA) benchmarks remain far from solved. We argue that this gap is partly due to underspecified questions, that are queries whose interpretation cannot be uniquely determined without additional context. We introduce an LLM-based classifier to identify underspecified questions and apply it to several widely used QA datasets, finding that 16% to over 60% of benchmark questions are underspecified and that LLMs perform significantly worse on them. To isolate the effect of underspecification, we conduct a controlled rewriting experiment that serves as an upper-bound analysis, rewriting underspecified questions into fully specified variants while holding gold answers fixed. QA performance consistently improves under this setting, indicating that many apparent QA failures stem from question underspecification rather than model limitations. Our findings highlight underspecification as an important confound in QA evaluation and motivate greater attention to question clarity in benchmark design.

Ho-Lam Chung, Yiming Chen, Hung-yi Lee

Neural audio codecs are widely used as tokenizers for spoken language models, but they are optimized for waveform reconstruction rather than autoregressive prediction.This mismatch injects acoustically driven uncertainty into the discrete token space and increases language-model perplexity.We propose , which augments codec training with language-model-facing objectives while keeping both codec and LLM architectures unchanged.introduces (i) future token prediction with Medusa-style multi-step heads to encourage multi-step predictability, and (ii) semantic alignment that matches audio and text representations via a memory-bank contrastive loss.A differentiable Gumbel bridge enables end-to-end gradients from these objectives to the codec encoder.On SALMon speech coherence, token LMs trained on reach 61.6% accuracy (+12.1 points over AUV) while reducing perplexity 35\times.On Codec-SUPERB-tiny, improves speech Mel distance by 5.0% over AUV while simultaneously achieving the learnability gains, demonstrating that reconstruction fidelity and token predictability can be improved together.

Mael Jullien, Andre Freitas, Marco Valentino, Leonardo Ranaldi

Recent works on large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the impact of prompting strategies and fine-tuning techniques on their reasoning capabilities. Yet, their effectiveness on clinical natural language inference (CTNLI) remains underexplored. This study presents the first controlled evaluation of how prompt structure and efficient fine-tuning jointly shape model performance in CTNLI.We inspect four classes of prompting strategies to elicit reasoning in LLMs at different levels of abstraction, and evaluate their impact on a range of clinically motivated reasoning types. For each prompting strategy, we construct high-quality demonstrations using a frontier model to distil multi-step reasoning capabilities into smaller models (≤ 4B parameters) via Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA). Across different LLMs fine-tuned on the NLI4CT benchmark, we found that prompt type alone accounts for up to 44% of the variance in macro-F1. Moreover, LoRA fine-tuning yields consistent gains of +8 to 12 F1, raises output alignment above 97%, and narrows the performance gap to GPT-4o-mini to within 7.1%. Additional experiments on reasoning generalisation reveal that LoRA improves performance in 75% of the models on MedNLI and TREC Clinical Trials.Overall, these findings demonstrate that (i) prompt structure is a primary driver of clinical NLI reasoning performance, (ii) compact models equipped with strong prompts and LoRA can rival frontier-scale systems, and (iii) reasoning-type-aware evaluation is essential to uncover prompt-induced trade-offs. Our results highlight the promise of combining prompt design and lightweight adaptation for more efficient and trustworthy clinical NLP systems, providing insights on the strengths and limitations of widely adopted prompting and parameter-efficient techniques in specialised domains. All code, annotations, prompts, demonstrations, and checkpoints will be released upon publication.

Miao Peng, Weizhou Shen, Nuo Chen, Chenliang Li, Ming Yan, Jia Li

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has proven effective in enhancing LLMs’ short-context reasoning but falters in long-context scenarios requiring precise grounding and multi-hop reasoning. We identify the "almost-there" phenomenon—trajectories that are largely correct but fail at the final step—in long-context reasoning RL and attribute this failure to two factors: (1) the lack of high reasoning density in long-context QA data, and (2) indiscriminate penalization of partially correct trajectories during long-context RL. To overcome this bottleneck, we propose DeepReasonQA, a KG-driven synthesis framework that controllably constructs high-difficulty, multi-hop long-context QA pairs with inherent reasoning chains. Building on this, we introduce Long-context Process Advantage Shaping (LongPAS), a simple yet effective method that performs fine-grained credit assignment by measuring reasoning steps along Validity and Relevance dimensions, which captures critical signals from "almost-there" trajectories. Experiments on three long-context reasoning benchmarks show that our approach substantially outperforms RLVR baselines and matches frontier LLMs while using far fewer parameters. Further analysis confirms the effectiveness of our methods in strengthening long-context reasoning while maintaining stable RL training.

James Petullo, Sonny George, Dylan Cashman, Nianwen Xue

A standard technique for scaling inference-time reasoning is Self-Consistency, whereby multiple candidate answers are sampled from an LLM and the most common answer is selected. More recently, it has been shown that weighted majority voting (e.g. Confidence-Informed Self Consistency (CISC)), which assigns a confidence value to each candidate answer and chooses the answer with the largest accumulated score, tends to be more accurate on a wide range of popular benchmarks. In practice, weighted majority voting necessitates calling a critic LLM on each candidate’s reasoning trace to produce the answer’s confidence score. This secondary series of LLM calls greatly increases the overhead and cost of weighted majority voting, despite its potential performance benefits. To reduce this expense, we propose VecCISC, a lightweight, adaptive framework that uses a measure of semantic similarity to filter reasoning traces that are semantically equivalent to others, degenerate, or hallucinated, thus decreasing the number of candidate answers that must be evaluated by the critic. To ensure adequate experimental thoroughness, we evaluated VecCISC on five challenging, widely-adopted datasets spanning the domains of mathematics, chemistry, biology, commonsense reasoning, and the humanities. Our results demonstrate that VecCISC reduces the total token usage by 47%, while maintaining or exceeding the accuracy of CISC.

Masao Someki, Chien-yu Huang, Siddhant Arora, Samuele Cornell, Markus Müller, Nathan Susanj, Rupak Vignesh Swaminathan, Grant Strimel, Jing Liu, Shinji Watanabe

Long-form audio understanding poses significant challenges for large audio language models (LALMs) due to the extreme length of audio sequences and the need to reason over heterogeneous acoustic cues distributed over time, such as speech content, speaker identity, emotion, and sound events. To address these challenges, we propose PlanRAG-Audio, a planning-based retrieval-augmented generation framework for scalable long-form audio understanding. Rather than having audio LALMs process entire recordings directly, PlanRAG-Audio explicitly plans which modalities and temporal spans are required for a given query, and retrieves only query-relevant information from a structured text and audio database. This retrieval planning enables effective reasoning over complex, cross-domain audio queries while substantially reducing the input length passed to the large language models. Experiments across a wide range of speech/audio retrieval demonstrate that PlanRAG-Audio improves reasoning accuracy and stabilizes performance as audio duration increases by decoupling inference cost from raw audio length.