Social media's openness fosters opinion exchange but complicates guiding users toward global consensus. Existing approaches are often invasive, modifying opinions or forcing cross-group interactions, undermining autonomy and triggering resistance. They also lack long-term planning, risking macro-level polarization despite local agreement. To address this, we propose H-NeiFi, a hierarchical, non-invasive opinion guidance framework. It models experts and non-experts separately and introduces a neighbor filtering mechanism that adaptively shapes communication without altering user opinions. Using multi-agent reinforcement learning with a long-term reward, H-NeiFi optimizes information flow while preserving interaction autonomy. Experiments show that it accelerates consensus by 22.0% to 30.7% and achieves global convergence even without experts, providing a natural and efficient paradigm for social network governance. Our code is available at: https://github.com/shijunguo44/H-NeiFi.
论文检索
输入标题、作者或关键词，从 100,903 篇学术成果中精准定位
Content moderation is a major challenge for online platforms. While user-driven blocking is a common tool, its dynamics are usually hidden as moderation data is private. Bluesky makes moderation actions public-by-design, providing an unprecedented opportunity to study a community-driven moderation ecosystem at scale. We leverage this transparency to (1) map the ecosystem of moderation blocking actions across 34 million users, including both individual blocks and the through blocklists, (2) identify the signals that correlate with blocking, and (3) measure the consequences of these actions. We demonstrate that community blocking is widespread, with a volume several orders of magnitude higher than official takedowns, and affects the visibility of more than 90 % of Bluesky content. The blocked accounts represent the most active, popular, toxic, and politically inclined users. However, different blocklists target different types of accounts and behaviors. Finally, blocking does not decrease the popularity and activity of the blocked users and has a limited effect on the social graph. By quantifying its dynamics and trade-offs, our study provides empirical grounding for designing future moderation systems that are transparent, pluralistic, and resistant to centralized control. Taken together, this study provides the first large-scale, quantitative analysis of a community-driven moderation ecosystem, demonstrating how individual and collective interventions influence user behavior.
Graph neural networks (GNNs) have become the cornerstone of graph representation learning in real-world applications, especially in social networks such as Facebook and Twitter, where user interactions naturally form graph-structured data. To safeguard sensitive information, including user attributes and personal connections, locally private graph learning protocols employ local differential privacy (LDP) to provide rigorous user-level guarantees. Despite these protections, we show that such protocols remain highly vulnerable to data poisoning attacks. Our approach targets the full-privacy setting, where both node features and edges are LDP-protected, and executes coordinated manipulations that significantly degrade utility, such as node classification accuracy, across multiple social network benchmarks. To counter these threats, we propose CureNet, a defense framework with four key components: (1) local data perturbation for privacy, (2) trimmed screening to filter abnormal submissions, (3) privacy-aware fake node pruning to remove sophisticated adversaries, and (4) a utility enhancement module to recover graph learning performance under privacy constraints. Extensive experiments on four real-world social network datasets—LastFM, Twitch, Github, and Facebook—demonstrate both the severe impact of our attack and the effectiveness of our defense. This study underscores the critical need to secure privacy-preserving graph learning against sophisticated poisoning threats.
Spamming activities (e.g., fake reviews, click farming, and deceptive content promotion) are increasingly conducted through collusive groups that exploit collective dynamics to manipulate platform metrics and mislead users, posing serious threats to the fairness, credibility, and functionality of online systems. To counteract these harmful behaviors, the task of spam detection has emerged as a critical area of research. However, existing detection methods generally remain limited in three key aspects: (i) They treat detection as a standard classification task, where representation learning and optimization are loosely coupled and suboptimal for capturing complex behaviors; (ii) They rely primarily on individual-level representation modeling, making it difficult to detect collective cheating strategies; (iii) They lack dedicated objective functions explicitly designed to characterize group-level spamming activities. To overcome these limitations, we introduce a collusion-aware Set-level learning framework (SetDet) that redefines the spam Detection task as a unified setwise optimization problem. Our approach offers three core advantages: (i) It enables end-to-end optimization by jointly learning representations and performing detection in a single, integrated process; (ii) It incorporates a model-level design for collusion representation, effectively capturing the temporal and relational patterns of coordinated spam; (iii) It pioneers a dedicated set-level optimization criterion that aligns closely with the structural characteristics of group-based cheating behaviors and accounts for class imbalance in real-world scenarios. Extensive experiments confirm the generalizability and superior performance of our framework across diverse spam scenarios and collusion strategies.
Information diffusion prediction aims to forecast the temporal spread of opinions and behaviors by identifying potential adopters. Existing methods typically treat information diffusion as a sequence of individual adoptions and rely on computationally expensive pairwise (one-to-one) influence computations, often restricting predictions to just the next adopter. This individual-level paradigm both misrepresents real-world collective (many-to-many) influences and suffers a critical efficiency trade-off: to remain feasible, such models must truncate long diffusion histories, thereby overlooking early initiators and opinion leaders. To overcome these limitations, we formalize a more practical task: Group-based Information Diffusion Prediction, and propose an effective and scalable GRID framework. Specifically, GRID first learns group-oriented graph embeddings via a task-regularized information bottleneck objective, which amplifies key influence pathways and produces reliable user embeddings for group identification. Built on these embeddings, the core GroupAttn module captures inter-group influence while reducing complexity from quadratic to linear in cascade length. This enables the modeling of ultra-long cascades (exceeding 10,000 users) without truncation while preserving representational fidelity within a provable error bound. Finally, a group-wise objective guides the model to predict semantically meaningful future groups. Extensive experiments on four real-world datasets show that GRID outperforms ten state-of-the-art baselines by an average of 10.65% in accuracy, while achieving an order-of-magnitude gain in efficiency and extending the supported cascade length by up to 10 times.
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has improved large language models (LLMs) on knowledge-intensive tasks, yet most systems assume static facts and struggle when answers depend on serialized and dynamic data, like time--e.g., ordering events, aligning facts to valid intervals, or planning actions under evolving conditions. This paper presents Knowledge-Graph Iterative Retrieval-Augmented Generation (KG-iRAG), a framework specialized for temporal reasoning. KG-iRAG couples a time-aware planner with a knowledge graph (KG) to iteratively fetch and compose evidence along a temporal axis. Concretely, it (i) represents events and facts with explicit timestamps and validity intervals; (ii) propagates temporal constraints through iterative retrieval using operators; and (iii) verifies temporal consistency while refining intermediate hypotheses, enabling step-by-step deduction for queries that mix knowledge retrieval with inference. Across public temporal QA benchmarks, KG-iRAG consistently improves accuracy and calibration over strong RAG baselines while reducing unnecessary retrieval through targeted, constraint-guided steps. To stress-test real-time decision queries, three application-oriented datasets (weatherQA-Irish, ~ weatherQA-Sydney, and~ trafficQA-TFNSW) are additionally constructed and tested alongside existing temporal benchmarks. The results demonstrate that injecting temporal structure into KG-driven RAG yields robust gains on multi-step, time-dependent queries, advancing the state of temporal reasoning with LLMs.
Taxonomy completion is the task of integrating new concepts into an existing taxonomy by determining the appropriate hypernym--hyponym relations. Existing approaches often struggle with the inherent imbalance between leaf and non-leaf edges, which induces bias in representation learning. In this paper, we propose BLEND: Balanced and Leaf-Enhanced Dual Fine-Tuning for Taxonomy Completion, a novel framework designed to mitigate this inductive bias. Our method employs independent fine-tuning of two lightweight large language models (LLMs): one optimized with a leaf-focused objective and the other trained with a balanced focused strategy. To further enhance structural understanding, we apply contrastive learning over structure-encoded paths and introduce a combined loss function, enabling more robust representation of hierarchical relations. Extensive experiments on three real-world benchmark datasets demonstrate that BLEND achieves up to 9.32% improvement in recall or hit metrics compared to state-of-the-art approaches. Moreover, BLEND delivers efficient inference while outperforming the latest baseline COMI, highlighting its effectiveness for taxonomy completion tasks.
Multimodal fake information increasingly threatens the Web ecosystem's trustworthiness and security, making improving detection accuracy a critical scientific challenge. The limited information interaction in traditional multimodal fake news detection methods fails to leverage semantic knowledge to model complex cross-modal forgery patterns and global structural anomalies, restricting the model's capability. To address the issues, this paper proposes a multimodal fake news detection method, SVPF-Net, that centers on semantic-driven visual enhancement and knowledge-aided modality-priority fusion. For visual representation optimization, we design a dual-feature extraction module and a dual-fusion enhancement module. A weighted fusion strategy is employed to construct a structured visual representation that integrates the semantics of local forgeries and global anomalies. Meanwhile, a cross-attention mechanism enables bidirectional alignment and interactive coupling between local and global image features, thereby achieving effective complementarity between local forgery cues and global anomaly patterns. For multimodal fusion, high-quality textual semantic features and visual representations are integrated via a modality-priority progressive fusion strategy that relies on cross-attention. The integration enables robust cross-modal semantic interaction and effectively enhances the efficiency of multimodal feature fusion. Comprehensive experiments validate the optimal performance of SVPF-Net and its ability to enhance interpretable semantics, providing valuable support for the practical application of reliable fake news detection.
Multimodal knowledge graphs (MMKG) extend the representational capacity of conventional knowledge graphs by integrating multimodal contexts. However, despite increasing attention on core tasks—multimodal link prediction (MMLP), multimodal entity alignment (MMEA), and multimodal entity linking (MMEL)—most existing approaches remain confined to meticulously tailored, task-specific and graph-specific paradigms, limiting their practicality in dynamic environments where tasks co-exist and new knowledge graphs continually emerge. In this work, we propose the first unified multi-task inductive inference framework for \MMKG (MtaIMKG) that can handle multiple core tasks, with universality and transferability to any unseen MMKG, by tackling inherent heterogeneities: i) Feature Heterogeneity: Bridging the semantic gaps in feature representations across domains. ii) Structural Heterogeneity: Overcoming structural divergence in topology across graphs. iii) Task Heterogeneity: Reconciling conflicting objectives and inductive biases across tasks. To address the above challenges, we center on reconciling divergent representation preferences across tasks, delivering only task-pertinent information instead of engaging in indiscriminate aggregation. Specifically, we introduce a task-aware routing network that dynamically integrates and routes multimodal representations, assesses their contributions under task semantics, and produces adaptive, task-conditioned representations for any input graph. In addition, MtaIMKG employs a gated mixture-of-experts to suppress cross-modal noise and extract complementary information across tasks. These strategies tackle the notable heterogeneity challenges in multi-task inductive inference on MMKG, enabling MtaIMKG to effectively zero-shot generalize to any unseen graph. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MtaIMKG achieves SOTA performance in both multi-task inductive and transductive inference with competitive efficiency, confirming its value as a scalable and generalizable solution for MMKG reasoning. Our code is released at https://github.com/MMKGer/MtaIMKG/.
Dynamic graph clustering aims to detect and track time-varying clusters in dynamic graphs, revealing how complex real-world systems evolve over time. However, existing methods are predominantly black-box models. They lack interpretability in their clustering decisions and fail to provide semantic explanations of why clusters form or how they evolve, severely limiting their use in safety-critical domains such as healthcare or transportation. To address these limitations, we propose an end-to-end interpretable framework that maps continuous graph embeddings into discrete semantic concepts through learnable prototypes. Specifically, we first decompose node representations into orthogonal role and clustering subspaces, so that nodes with similar roles (e.g., hubs, bridges) but different cluster affiliations can be properly distinguished. We then introduce five node role prototypes (Leader, Contributor, Wanderer, Connector, Newcomer) in the role subspace as semantic anchors, transforming continuous embeddings into discrete concepts to facilitate LLM understanding of node roles within communities. Finally, we design a hierarchical LLM reasoning mechanism to generate both clustering results and natural language explanations, while providing consistency feedback as weak supervision to refine node representations. Experimental results on four synthetic and six real-world benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness, interpretability, and robustness of DyG-RoLLM. Code is available at https: //github.com/Clearloveyuan/DyG-RoLLM.
Wikipedia, a vast and continuously consulted knowledge base, faces significant challenges in maintaining up-to-date content due to its reliance on manual human editors. Inspired by the vision of continuous knowledge acquisition in NELL and fueled by advances in LLM-based agents, this paper introduces WINEL, an agentic framework for continuously updating Wikipedia articles. Our approach employs a multi-agent framework to aggregate online information, select new and important knowledge for a target entity in Wikipedia, and then generate precise edit suggestions for human review. Our fine-grained editing models, trained on Wikipedia's extensive history of human edits, enable incorporating updates in a manner consistent with human editing behavior. Our editor models outperform both open-source instruction-following baselines and closed-source LLMs (e.g., GPT-4o) in key-information coverage and editing efficiency. End-to-end evaluation on high-activity Wikipedia pages demonstrates WINELL's ability to identify timely factual updates. This opens up a promising research direction in LLM agents for automatically updating knowledge bases in a never-ending fashion.
As social media and the World Wide Web become hubs for information dissemination, effectively organizing and understanding the vast amounts of dynamically evolving Web content is crucial. Knowledge graphs (KGs) provide a powerful framework for structuring this information. However, the rapid emergence of new hot topics, user relationships, and events in social media renders traditional static knowledge graph embedding (KGE) models rapidly outdated. Continual Knowledge Graph Embedding (CKGE) aims to address this issue, but existing methods commonly suffer from catastrophic forgetting, whereby older, but still valuable, information is lost when learning new knowledge (such as new memes or trending events). This means the model cannot effectively learn the evolution of the data. We propose a novel CKGE framework, BAKE. Unlike existing methods, BAKE formulates CKGE as a sequential Bayesian inference problem and utilizes the Bayesian posterior update principle as a natural continual learning strategy. This principle is insensitive to data order and provides theoretical guarantees to preserve prior knowledge as much as possible. Specifically, we treat each batch of new data as a Bayesian update to the model's prior. By maintaining the posterior distribution, the model effectively preserves earlier knowledge even as it evolves over multiple snapshots. Furthermore, to constrain the evolution of knowledge across snapshots, we introduce a continual clustering method that maintains the compact cluster structure of entity embeddings through a regularization term, ensuring semantic consistency while allowing controlled adaptation to new knowledge. We conduct extensive experiments on multiple CKGE benchmarks, which demonstrate that BAKE achieves the top performance in the vast majority of cases compared to existing approaches.
Transparent and standardized documentation is essential for building trustworthy generative AI (GAI) systems. However, current automated model and data card generation methods still face three key challenges: (i) Static templates. Most systems rely on fixed query templates that cannot adapt to diverse paper structures or evolving documentation requirements. (ii) Information scarcity. Web-scale repositories such as Hugging Face often provide incomplete or inconsistent metadata, resulting in missing or noisy information. (iii) Lack of benchmarks. The absence of standardized datasets and evaluation protocols prevents fair and reproducible assessment of documentation quality. To address these challenges, we propose AdaQE-CG, an Adaptive Query Expansion for Card Generation framework that integrates dynamic information extraction with cross-card knowledge transfer. The Intra-Paper Extraction via Context-Aware Query Expansion (IPE-QE) module iteratively refines extraction queries to capture richer and more complete information from scientific papers and repositories. The Inter-Card Completion using the MetaGAI Pool (ICC-MP) module enriches missing fields by transferring semantically relevant content from similar cards within a curated dataset. In addition, we construct MetaGAI-Bench, the first large-scale, expert-annotated benchmark for evaluating GAI documentation. Comprehensive experiments across five quality dimensions demonstrate that AdaQE-CG significantly outperforms existing approaches, surpasses human-authored data cards, and approaches human-level quality for model cards. Code, prompts, and data are publicly available at: https://github.com/haoxuan-unt2024/AdaQE-CG.
Large Language Models have achieved impressive performance across a wide range of applications. However, they often suffer from hallucinations in knowledge-intensive domains due to their reliance on static pretraining corpora. To address this limitation, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances LLMs by incorporating external knowledge sources during inference. Among these sources, Textural Graphs offer structured and semantically rich information that supports more precise and interpretable reasoning. This has led to growing interest in Graph-based RAG systems. Despite their potential, most existing approaches rely on a single retriever to identify relevant subgraphs, which limits their ability to capture the diverse aspects of complex queries. Moreover, these systems often struggle to accurately judge the relevance of retrieved content, making them prone to distraction by irrelevant noise. To address these challenges, in this paper, we propose MixRAG, a Mixture-of-Experts Graph-RAG framework that introduces multiple specialized graph retrievers and a dynamic routing controller to better handle diverse query intents. Each retriever is trained to focus on a specific aspect of graph semantics, such as entities, relations, or subgraph topology. A Mixture-of-Experts module adaptively selects and fuses relevant retrievers based on the input query. To reduce noise in the retrieved information, we introduce a query-aware GraphEncoder that carefully analyzes relationships within the retrieved subgraphs, helping to highlight the most relevant parts while down-weighting unnecessary noise. Empirical results show that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance and consistently outperforms various baselines. The code can be found from https://github.com/lihuiliullh/MixRAG
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance on general Question Answering (QA), yet they often struggle in domain-specific scenarios where accurate and up-to-date information is required. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses this limitation by enriching LLMs with external knowledge, but existing systems primarily rely on unstructured documents, while largely overlooking relational databases, which provide precise, timely, and efficiently queryable factual information, serving as indispensable infrastructure in domains such as finance, healthcare, and scientific research. Motivated by this gap, we conduct a systematic analysis that reveals three central observations: (i) databases and documents offer complementary strengths across queries, (ii) naively combining both sources introduces noise and cost without consistent accuracy gains, and (iii) selecting the most suitable source for each query is crucial to balance effectiveness and efficiency. We further observe that query types show consistent regularities in their alignment with retrieval paths, suggesting that routing decisions can be effectively guided by systematic rules that capture these patterns. Building on these insights, we propose a rule-driven routing framework designed specifically for hybrid-source RAG. A routing agent scores candidate augmentation paths based on explicit rules and selects the most suitable one; a rule-making expert agent refines the rules using QA feedback to produce more comprehensive and reliable decision criteria; and a path-level meta-cache reuses past routing decisions for semantically similar queries to reduce latency and cost. Experiments on three QA datasets demonstrate that our framework consistently outperforms static strategies and learned routing baselines, achieving higher accuracy while maintaining moderate computational cost.
Taxonomies form the backbone of structured knowledge representation across diverse domains, enabling applications such as e-commerce and semantic search. Yet, manual taxonomy expansion is labor-intensive and slow. Existing methods rely on point-based vector embeddings, which model symmetric similarity and thus struggle with the asymmetric relationships that are fundamental to taxonomies. Box embeddings offer a promising alternative by enabling containment and disjointness, but they face key issues: (i) unstable gradients at the intersection boundaries, (ii) no notion of semantic uncertainty, and (iii) limited capacity to represent polysemy or ambiguity. We address these shortcomings with TaxoBell, a Gaussian box embedding framework that translates between box geometries and multivariate Gaussian distributions, where means encode semantic location and covariances encode uncertainty. Energy-based optimization yields stable optimization, robust modeling of ambiguous concepts, and interpretable hierarchical reasoning. Extensive experiments on five benchmark datasets demonstrate that TaxoBell significantly outperforms eight state-of-the-art taxonomy expansion baselines by 19% in MRR and around 25% in Recall@k. We further demonstrate the advantages and pitfalls of TaxoBell with error analysis and ablation studies.