论文检索

Applications · Robotics

Korneel Van den Berghe, Stein Stroobants, Vijay Janapa Reddi, Guido de Croon

Neuromorphic computing systems are set to revolutionize energy-constrained robotics by achieving orders-of-magnitude efficiency gains, while enabling native temporal processing. Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) represent a promising algorithmic approach for these systems, yet their application to complex control tasks faces two critical challenges: (1) the non-differentiable nature of spiking neurons necessitates surrogate gradients with unclear optimization properties, and (2) the stateful dynamics of SNNs require training on sequences, which in reinforcement learning (RL) is hindered by limited sequence lengths during early training, preventing the network from bridging its warm-up period. We address these challenges by systematically analyzing surrogate gradient slope settings, showing that shallower slopes increase gradient magnitude in deeper layers but reduce alignment with true gradients. In supervised learning, we find no clear preference for fixed or scheduled slopes. The effect is much more pronounced in RL settings, where shallower slopes or scheduled slopes lead to a $\times2.1$ improvement in both training and final deployed performance. Next, we propose a novel training approach that leverages a privileged guiding policy to bootstrap the learning process, while still exploiting online environment interactions with the spiking policy. Combining our method with an adaptive slope schedule for a real-world drone position control task, we achieve an average return of 400 points, substantially outperforming prior techniques, including Behavioral Cloning and TD3BC, which achieve at most –200 points under the same conditions. This work advances both the theoretical understanding of surrogate gradient learning in SNNs and practical training methodologies for neuromorphic controllers demonstrated in real-world robotic systems.

Data-centric AI · Data-centric AI methods and tools

Yang Zhao, Kai Xiong, Xiao Ding, Li Du, Yangou Ouyang, Zhouhao Sun, Jiannan Guan, Wenbin Zhang, Bin Liu, Dong Hu 等

A primary impediment to scaling reinforcement learning (RL) for large language model (LLM) training is the substantial computational cost, predominantly arising from the necessity of multi-sampling for policy optimization and evaluation. This underscores the critical yet challenging nature of efficient training data selection. Drawing inspiration from the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) theory, which posits that learners acquire knowledge more effectively from tasks of intermediate difficulty, we hypothesize that LLMs exhibit optimal learning from data they have not yet mastered but demonstrate the potential to comprehend. Conventional methodologies for assessing data difficulty or informativeness typically rely on computationally intensive multi-sampling or iterative procedures. To address this limitation, we introduce UFO-RL (**U**ncertainty-**F**ocused **O**ptimization for **R**einforcement **L**earning), a novel framework that employs a computationally efficient single-pass uncertainty estimation technique to identify informative training instances. This method, requiring only a single forward pass and obviating the need for iterative next-token computation, achieves a significant acceleration (up to 185$\times$) in data evaluation compared to multi-sampling approaches. UFO-RL leverages this efficient metric to select data within the model's estimated ZPD for training. Extensive experimentation across diverse LLMs and mathematical benchmarks demonstrates that training with a mere 10\% of the data, carefully selected by UFO-RL, yields performance comparable to or even surpassing that of full-data training. Furthermore, this targeted data selection results in up to a 16$\times$ reduction in overall training time, concurrently enhancing training stability and improving generalization capabilities. Thus, UFO-RL presents a practical and highly efficient strategy for scaling RL fine-tuning of LLMs by focusing learning efforts on the most informative and valuable data, thereby mitigating the computational bottlenecks associated with traditional RL training.

Social Aspects

Dongyang Zeng, Yaping Liu, Wei Zhang, Shuo Zhang, Xinwang Liu, Binxing Fang

With the increasing adoption of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems for knowledge-intensive tasks, ensuring the adequacy of retrieved documents has become critically important for generation quality. Traditional reranking approaches face three significant challenges: substantial computational overhead that scales with document length, dependency on plain text that limits application in sensitive scenarios, and insufficient assessment of document value beyond simple relevance metrics. We propose EAReranker, an efficient embedding-based adequacy assessment framework that evaluates document utility for RAG systems without requiring access to original text content. The framework quantifies document adequacy through a comprehensive scoring methodology considering verifiability, coverage, completeness and structural aspects, providing interpretable adequacy classifications for downstream applications. EAReranker employs a Decoder-Only Transformer architecture that introduces embedding dimension expansion method and bin-aware weighted loss, designed specifically to predict adequacy directly from embedding vectors. Our comprehensive evaluation across four public benchmarks demonstrates that EAReranker achieves competitive performance with state-of-the-art plaintext rerankers while maintaining constant memory usage ($\sim$550MB) regardless of input length and processing 2-3x faster than traditional approaches. The semantic bin adequacy prediction accuracy of 92.85\% LACC@10 and 86.12\% LACC@25 demonstrates its capability to effectively filter out inadequate documents that could potentially mislead or adversely impact RAG system performance, thereby ensuring only high-utility information serves as generation context. These results establish EAReranker as an efficient and practical solution for enhancing RAG system performance through improved context selection while addressing the computational and privacy challenges of existing methods.

Applications · Language, Speech and Dialog

Houyi Li, Wenzhen Zheng, Qiufeng Wang, Zhenyu Ding, Haoying Wang, Zili Wang, Shijie Xuyang, Ning DING, Shuigeng Zhou, Xiangyu Zhang 等

Training Large Language Models (LLMs) is prohibitively expensive, creating a critical scaling gap where insights from small-scale experiments often fail to transfer to resource-intensive production systems, thereby hindering efficient innovation. To bridge this, we introduce Farseer, a novel and refined scaling law offering enhanced predictive accuracy across scales. By systematically constructing a model loss surface $L(N,D)$, Farseer achieves a significantly better fit to empirical data than prior laws (e.g., \Chinchilla's law). Our methodology yields accurate, robust, and highly generalizable predictions, demonstrating excellent extrapolation capabilities, outperforming Chinchilla's law, whose extrapolation error is 433\% higher. This allows for the reliable evaluation of competing training strategies across all $(N,D)$ settings, enabling conclusions from small-scale ablation studies to be confidently extrapolated to predict large-scale performance. Furthermore, Farseer provides new insights into optimal compute allocation, better reflecting the nuanced demands of modern LLM training. To validate our approach, we trained an extensive suite of approximately 1,000 LLMs across diverse scales and configurations, consuming roughly 3 million NVIDIA H100 GPU hours. To foster further research, we are comprehensively open-sourcing all code, data, results (https://github.com/Farseer-Scaling-Law/Farseer), all training logs (https://wandb.ai/billzid/Farseer?nw=nwuserbillzid), all models used in scaling law fitting (https://huggingface.co/Farseer-Scaling-Law).

Zhanhao Xie, Yuexiao Ma, Xiawu Zheng, Fei Chao, Wanchen Sui, Yong Li, Shen Li, Rongrong Ji

The Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture enables efficient model scaling through conditional computation, where only subset of parameters are activated per input. However, this distributed architecture poses unprecedented challenges for model compression, as conventional quantization methods optimized for dense networks prove inadequate. This paper introduces a specialized quantization framework for MoE architectures, motivated by our discovery that weight matrices across expert networks exhibit distinctive channel-wise outlier distributions, necessitating a more nuanced compression approach. Through theoretical analysis incorporating Fisher Information matrices and condition number characteristics, we establish a fundamental relationship between layer functionality and quantization sensitivity, demonstrating that down-projection layers inherently demand higher precision compared to up-projection layers. Leveraging these insights, we develop an automated channel-wise quantization framework that dynamically determines optimal bit-width allocations while maintaining minimal computational overhead through efficient statistical approximations. When evaluated on the Mixtral-8x7b-v0.1 architecture, our methodology demonstrates a 3.96% improvement over existing state-of-the-art approaches across natural language understanding benchmarks, while achieving superior compression ratios.

Itamar Trainin, Omri Abend

Using LLMs for Multi-Document Topic Extraction has recently gained popularity due to their apparent high-quality outputs, expressiveness, and ease of use. However, most existing evaluation practices are not designed for LLM-generated topics and result in low inter-annotator agreement scores, hindering the reliable use of LLMs for the task. To address this, we introduce T^5Score, an evaluation methodology that decomposes the quality of a topic set into quantifiable aspects, measurable through easy-to-perform annotation tasks. This framing enables a convenient, manual or automatic, evaluation procedure resulting in a strong inter-annotator agreement score.To substantiate our methodology and claims, we perform extensive experimentation on multiple datasets and report the results.

Aochong Oliver Li, Tanya Goyal

Large language models (LLMs) encode vast amounts of pre-trained knowledge in their parameters, but updating them as real-world information evolves remains a challenge. Existing methodologies and benchmarks primarily target entity substitutions, failing to capture the full breadth of complex real-world dynamics. In this paper, we introduce Knowledge Update Playground (KUP), an automatic pipeline for simulating realistic knowledge updates reflected in an evidence corpus. KUP’s evaluation framework includes direct and indirect probes to both test memorization of updated facts and reasoning over them, for any update learning methods. Next, we present a lightweight method called memory conditioned training (MCT), which conditions tokens in the update corpus on self-generated ”memory” tokens during training. Our strategy encourages LLMs to surface and reason over newly memorized knowledge at inference. Our results on two LLM families show that (1) KUP benchmark is highly challenging, with the best CPT models achieving <2% in indirect probing setting (reasoning) and (2) MCT training significantly outperforms prior continued pre-training (CPT) baselines, improving direct probing (memorization) results by up to 25.4%.

Shoumik Saha, Soheil Feizi

The growing use of large language models (LLMs) for text generation has led to widespread concerns about AI-generated content detection. However, an overlooked challenge is AI-polished text, where human-written content undergoes subtle refinements using AI tools. This raises a critical question: should minimally polished text be classified as AI-generated? Such classification can lead to false plagiarism accusations and misleading claims about AI prevalence in online content. In this study, we systematically evaluate *twelve* state-of-the-art AI-text detectors using our **AI-Polished-Text Evaluation (APT-Eval)** dataset, which contains 15K samples refined at varying AI-involvement levels. Our findings reveal that detectors frequently flag even minimally polished text as AI-generated, struggle to differentiate between degrees of AI involvement, and exhibit biases against older and smaller models. These limitations highlight the urgent need for more nuanced detection methodologies.

Marcus Tantakoun, Christian Muise, Xiaodan Zhu

Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in various natural language tasks but often struggle with long-horizon planning problems requiring structured reasoning. This limitation has drawn interest in integrating neuro-symbolic approaches within the Automated Planning (AP) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) communities. However, identifying optimal AP deployment frameworks can be daunting and introduces new challenges. This paper aims to provide a timely survey of the current research with an in-depth analysis, positioning LLMs as tools for formalizing and refining planning specifications to support reliable off-the-shelf AP planners. By systematically reviewing the current state of research, we highlight methodologies, and identify critical challenges and future directions, hoping to contribute to the joint research on NLP and Automated Planning.

Minal Nitin Dani, Aishwarya Maheswaran, Maunendra Sankar Desarkar

A NOTAM or NOtice To AirMen is a crucial notice for different aviation stakeholders, particularly flight crews. It delivers essential notifications about abnormal conditions of Aviation System components such as changes to facilities, hazards, service, procedure that are not known far enough in advance to be publicized through other means. NOTAM messages are short, contain acronyms, and look cryptic in most of the cases. Writing and understanding these messages put heavy cognitive load on its end users. In this work, we take up the task of translating NOTAMs into English natural language using LLMs. Since NOTAMs do not adhere to English grammar rules and have their own decoding rules, large language models (LLMs) cannot translate them without effective prompting. In this paper, we develop a framework to come up with effective prompts to achieve the translations. Our approach uses context-aware semantic prompting techniques, paired with domain-specific rules, to improve the accuracy and clarity of translations. The framework is evaluated using comprehensive experiments (6 LLMs of varying sizes, and with 5 different prompting setups for each) and eight evaluation metrics measuring different aspects of the translation. The results demonstrate that our methodology can produce clear translations that accurately convey the information contained in NOTAMs.

George-Kirollos Saad, Scott Sanner

Query-driven recommendation with unknown items poses a challenge for users to understand why certain items are appropriate for their needs. Query-driven Contrastive Summarization (QCS) is a methodology designed to address this issue by leveraging language-based item descriptions to clarify contrasts between them. However, existing state-of-the-art contrastive summarization methods such as STRUM-LLM fall short of this goal. To overcome these limitations, we introduce Q-STRUM Debate, a novel extension of STRUM-LLM that employs debate-style prompting to generate focused and contrastive summarizations of item aspects relevant to a query. Leveraging modern large language models (LLMs) as powerful tools for generating debates, Q-STRUM Debate provides enhanced contrastive summaries. Experiments across three datasets demonstrate that Q-STRUM Debate yields significant performance improvements over existing methods on key contrastive summarization criteria, thus introducing a novel and performant debate prompting methodology for QCS.

Glenn Matlin, Mika Okamoto, Huzaifa Pardawala, Yang Yang, Sudheer Chava

Language Models (LMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities with core Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. The effectiveness of LMs for highly specialized knowledge-intensive tasks in finance remains difficult to assess due to major gaps in the methodologies of existing evaluation frameworks, which have caused an erroneous belief in a far lower bound of LMs’ performance on common Finance NLP (FinNLP) tasks. To demonstrate the potential of LMs for these FinNLP tasks, we present the first holistic benchmarking suite for Financial Language Model Evaluation (FLaME). We are the first research paper to comprehensively study LMs against ‘reasoning-reinforced’ LMs, with an empirical study of 23 foundation LMs over 20 core NLP tasks in finance. We open-source our framework software along with all data and results.

Anar Yeginbergen, Maite Oronoz, Rodrigo Agerri

This paper investigates the role of dynamic external knowledge integration in improving counter-argument generation using Large Language Models (LLMs). While LLMs have shown promise in argumentative tasks, their tendency to generate lengthy, potentially non-factual responses highlights the need for more controlled and evidence-based approaches. We introduce a reconstructed and manually curated dataset of argument and counter-argument pairs specifically designed to balance argumentative complexity with evaluative feasibility. We also propose a new LLM-as-a-Judge evaluation methodology that shows a stronger correlation with human judgments compared to traditional reference-based metrics. Our experimental results demonstrate that integrating dynamic external knowledge from the web significantly improves the quality of generated counter-arguments, particularly in terms of relatedness, persuasiveness, and factuality. The findings suggest that combining LLMs with real-time external knowledge retrieval offers a promising direction for developing more effective and reliable counter-argumentation systems. Data and code are publicly available: https://github.com/anaryegen/ counter-argument-generation

Shayan Alipour, Indira Sen, Mattia Samory, Tanu Mitra

Despite a growing literature finding that large language models (LLMs) exhibit demographic biases, reports with whom they align best are hard to generalize or even contradictory. In this work, we examine the alignment of LLMs with human annotations in five offensive language datasets, comprising approximately 220K annotations. While demographic traits, particularly race, influence alignment, these effects vary across datasets and are often entangled with other factors. Confounders introduced in the annotation process—such as document difficulty, annotator sensitivity, and within-group agreement—account for more variation in alignment patterns than demographic traits. Alignment increases with annotator sensitivity and group agreement, and decreases with document difficulty. Our results underscore the importance of multi-dataset analyses and confounder-aware methodologies in developing robust measures of demographic bias.

Xiang Hu, Hongyu Fu, Jinge Wang, Yifeng Wang, Zhikun Li, Renjun Xu, Yu Lu, Yaochu Jin, Lili Pan, Zhenzhong Lan

Scientific innovation is pivotal for humanity, and harnessing large language models (LLMs) to generate research ideas could transform discovery. However, existing LLMs often produce simplistic and repetitive suggestions due to their limited ability in acquiring external knowledge for innovation. To address this problem, we introduce an enhanced planning and search methodology designed to boost the creative potential of LLM-based systems. Our approach involves an iterative process to purposely plan the retrieval of external knowledge, progressively enriching the idea generation with broader and deeper insights. Validation through automated and human assessments demonstrates that our framework substantially elevates the quality of generated ideas, particularly in novelty and diversity. The number of unique novel ideas produced by our framework is 3.4 times higher than without it. Moreover, our method outperforms the current state-of-the-art, generating at least 2.5 times more top-rated ideas based on 170 seed papers in a Swiss Tournament evaluation. Our code is available at https://github.com/hflyzju/Nova

Ziang Ye, Zhenru Zhang, Yang Zhang, Jianxin Ma, Junyang Lin, Fuli Feng

When using agent-task datasets to enhance agent capabilities for Large Language Models (LLMs), current methodologies often treat all tokens within a sample equally. However, we argue that tokens serving different roles—specifically, reasoning tokens versus boilerplate tokens (e.g., those governing output format)—differ significantly in importance and learning complexity, necessitating their disentanglement and distinct treatment. To address this, we propose a novel Shuffle-Aware Discriminator (SHAD) for adaptive token discrimination. SHAD classifies tokens by exploiting predictability differences observed after shuffling input-output combinations across samples: boilerplate tokens, due to their repetitive nature among samples, maintain predictability, whereas reasoning tokens do not. Using SHAD, we propose the Reasoning-highlighted Fine-Tuning (RFT) method, which adaptively emphasizes reasoning tokens during fine-tuning, yielding notable performance gains over common Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT).

Thushari Atapattu, Menasha Thilakaratne, Duc Nhan Do, Mahen Herath, Katrina E. Falkner

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into mental health education and training (MHET) has become a promising solution to meet the increasing demand for skilled mental health professionals. This systematic review analyses 38 studies on AI-powered conversational agents (CAs) in MHET, selected from a total of 1003 studies published between 2019 and 2024. Following the PRISMA protocol, we reviewed papers from computer science, medicine, and interdisciplinary databases, assessing key aspects such as technological approaches, data characteristics, application areas, and evaluation methodologies. Our findings reveal that AI-based approaches, including Large Language Models (LLMs), dominate the field, with training as the application area being the most prevalent. These technologies show promise in simulating therapeutic interactions but face challenges such as limited public datasets, lack of standardised evaluation frameworks, and difficulty in ensuring authentic emotional responses, along with gaps in ethical considerations and clinical efficacy. This review presents a comprehensive framework for understanding the role of CAs in MHET while providing valuable recommendations to guide future research.

Zhengdong Yang, Shuichiro Shimizu, Yahan Yu, Chenhui Chu

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have spurred interest in expanding their application beyond text-based tasks. A large number of studies have explored integrating other modalities with LLMs, notably speech modality, which is naturally related to text. This paper surveys the integration of speech with LLMs, categorizing the methodologies into three primary approaches: text-based, latent-representation-based, and audio-token-based integration. We also demonstrate how these methods are applied across various speech-related applications and highlight the challenges in this field to offer inspiration for future research.

Francesco Maria Molfese, Luca Moroni, Luca Gioffré, Alessandro Scirè, Simone Conia, Roberto Navigli

One of the most widely used tasks for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) is Multiple-Choice Question Answering (MCQA). While open-ended question answering tasks are more challenging to evaluate, MCQA tasks are, in principle, easier to assess, as the model’s answer is thought to be simple to extract and is compared directly to a set of predefined choices. However, recent studies have started to question the reliability of MCQA evaluation, showing that multiple factors can significantly impact the reported performance of LLMs, especially when the model generates free-form text before selecting one of the answer choices. In this work, we shed light on the inconsistencies of MCQA evaluation strategies, which can lead to inaccurate and misleading model comparisons. We systematically analyze whether existing answer extraction methods are aligned with human judgment, and how they are influenced by answer constraints in the prompt across different domains. Our experiments demonstrate that traditional evaluation strategies often underestimate LLM capabilities, while LLM-based answer extractors are prone to systematic errors. Moreover, we reveal a fundamental trade-off between including format constraints in the prompt to simplify answer extraction and allowing models to generate free-form text to improve reasoning. Our findings call for standardized evaluation methodologies and highlight the need for more reliable and consistent MCQA evaluation practices.

Anna Mosolova, Marie Candito, Carlos Ramisch

In the absence of sense-annotated data, word sense induction (WSI) is a compelling alternative to word sense disambiguation, particularly in low-resource or domain-specific settings. In this paper, we emphasize methodological problems in current WSI evaluation. We propose an evaluation on a SemCor-derived dataset, respecting the original corpus polysemy and frequency distributions. We assess pre-trained embeddings and clustering algorithms across parts of speech, and propose and evaluate an LLM-based WSI method for English. We evaluate data augmentation sources (LLM-generated, corpus and lexicon), and semi-supervised scenarios using Wiktionary for data augmentation, must-link constraints, number of clusters per lemma.We find that no unsupervised method (whether ours or previous) surpasses the strong “one cluster per lemma” heuristic (1cpl). We also show that (i) results and best systems may vary across POS, (ii) LLMs have troubles performing this task, (iii) data augmentation is beneficial and (iv) capitalizing on Wiktionary does help. It surpasses previous SOTA system on our test set by 3.3%. WSI is not solved, and calls for a better articulation of lexicons and LLMs’ lexical semantics capabilities.