Existing low-resource in-context learning-based knowledge graph question answering (KGQA) methods rely heavily on large language models (LLMs) to convert the natural language question into its corresponding logical form (LF), such as SPARQL, KoPL, etc. Recently, a few alignment techniques have been introduced that enable instruction-based fine-tuning of language models. They provide explicit negative signals and comparative objectives to learn how to avoid negative signals using preference optimization methods. Exploring such fine-tuning techniques with LLMs becomes very challenging due to the high computational resource requirements associated with them. Due to this, the focus has been shifted towards Small Language Models (SLMs), which offer advantages such as ease of (i) deployment for practical applications and (ii) instruction fine-tuning for specialized tasks. Motivated by this, in this work, we propose PO-KGQA: An SLM-based preference optimization framework for the complex KGQA task in a low-resource setting. Our extensive experiments demonstrate how PO-KGQA outperforms other fine-tuning alignment techniques on complex benchmarks such as KQA Pro by approximately 9% (avg).
论文检索
输入标题、作者或关键词，从 9,460 篇学术成果中精准定位
Current approaches to proactive assistance move beyond the ask-and-respond paradigm by anticipating user needs. In practice, they either burden users with clarifying questions or rely on context-based extrapolation, often leading to unnecessary or mistimed interventions. Such systems lack explicit mechanisms to model users’ knowledge gaps, resulting in incomplete or suboptimal task outcomes. To address this, we propose PROPER, a framework that explicitly models user-specific knowledge gaps in a controlled manner. Central to our approach is the notion of dimensions: structured, task-relevant factors that define the considerations required for effective task completion. Given a user query, the DGA (Dimension Generating Agent) identifies explicit dimensions (from the user’s query) and generates a set of candidate implicit dimensions capturing unarticulated aspects of the task. The RGA (Response Generating Agent) integrates both explicit and implicit dimensions selectively to produce personalized, context-aware, and proactively informative responses. We evaluate PROPER across multiple domains using a structured, gap-aware rubric that measures coverage, initiative appropriateness, and intent alignment. PROPER improves on quality scores and win rates across all domains, achieving up to 84% gains in single-turn evaluation and consistent dominance in multiturn interactions. All code for PROPER is available at: https://github.com/i-kiran/ProPer-Agent.
Do vision-language models (VLMs) develop more human-like sensitivity to linguistic concreteness than text-only large language models (LLMs) when both are evaluated with text-only prompts? We study this question with a controlled comparison between matched Llama text backbones and their Llama Vision counterparts across multiple model scales, treating multimodal pretraining as an ablation on perceptual grounding rather than access to images at inference. We measure concreteness effects at three complementary levels: (i) output behavior, by relating question-level concreteness to QA accuracy; (ii) embedding geometry, by testing whether representations organize along a concreteness axis; and (iii) attention dynamics, by quantifying context reliance via attention-entropy measures. In addition, we elicit token-level concreteness ratings from models and evaluate alignment to human norm distributions, testing whether multimodal training yields more human-consistent judgments. Across benchmarks and scales, VLMs show larger gains on more concrete inputs, exhibit clearer concreteness-structured representations, produce ratings that better match human norms, and display systematically different attention patterns consistent with increased grounding.
Memory-augmented language agents are increasingly deployed in affective applications such as emotional support, where understanding and responding to users’ latent emotional needs is critical. However, existing research often treats memory as a tool for factual retrieval, overlooking its role in shaping users’ emotional experiences. In this work, we introduce ENPMR-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating Emotional Need-aware Proactive Memory Retrieval (ENPMR), a core capability that enables agents to infer users’ latent emotional needs and proactively retrieve appropriate memories to support empathetic interaction. Grounded in Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, ENPMR-Bench includes over 1,800 memory-augmented dialogues and defines structured mappings between emotional needs and supportive memory types. Experimental results demonstrate that current retrieval paradigms, including both embedding-based and LLM-driven approaches, exhibit substantial deficiencies, with empathy scores significantly lagging behind golden memory conditions. While chain-of-thought prompting improves the alignment between inferred emotional needs and retrieved memories to some extent, a notable performance gap remains. Together, these findings reveal critical limitations in current agents and outline directions for advancing personalized emotional support through need-sensitive memory retrieval.
Despite substantial efforts toward improving the moral alignment of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), it remains unclear whether their ethical judgments are stable in realistic settings. This work studies moral robustness in VLMs, defined as the ability to preserve moral judgments under textual and visual perturbations that do not alter the underlying moral context. We systematically probe VLMs with a diverse set of model-agnostic multimodal perturbations and find that their moral stances are highly fragile, frequently flipping under simple manipulations. Our analysis reveals systematic vulnerabilities across perturbation types, moral domains, and model scales, including a sycophancy trade-off where stronger instruction-following models are more susceptible to persuasion. We further show that lightweight inference-time interventions can partially restore moral stability. These results demonstrate that moral alignment alone is insufficient and that moral robustness is a necessary criterion for the responsible deployment of VLMs.
Recent advances in post-training techniques have endowed Large Language Models (LLMs) with enhanced capabilities for tackling complex, logic-intensive tasks through the generation of supplementary planning tokens. This development raises a fundamental question – Are these models aware of what they "learn” and "think”? To address this, we define three core competencies: (1) awareness of learned latent policies, (2) generalization of these policies across domains, and (3) alignment between internal reasoning traces and final outputs. We empirically evaluate these abilities on several tasks, each designed to require learning a distinct policy. Furthermore, we contrast the profiles of models post-trained via Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Policy Optimization (DPO), and Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). Our findings indicate that RL-trained models not only demonstrate greater awareness of their learned behaviors and stronger generalizability to novel, structurally similar tasks than SFT models but also often exhibit weak alignment between their reasoning traces and final outputs, an effect most pronounced in GRPO-trained models.
CoTJudger: A Graph-Driven Framework for Automatic Evaluation of Chain-of-Thought Efficiency and Redundancy in LRMs
PDF ↗Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated strong performance by producing extended Chain-of-Thought (CoT) traces before answering. However, this paradigm often induces over-reasoning: redundant calculations and circular self-verification that increase computational cost without improving outcomes. Existing evaluations largely emphasize final accuracy or coarse token counts, and lack automated tools to separate essential logic from structural redundancy. We introduce CoTJudger, a graph-driven framework that quantifies reasoning efficiency by converting free-form CoTs into directed dependency graphs and extracting the Shortest Effective Path (SEP) needed to reach a correct solution. This yields an interpretable efficiency signal – how much of a CoT is necessary versus structurally redundant – that is comparable across models and tasks. Evaluating 21 LRMs, CoTJudger reveals pervasive redundancy and surfaces recurring failure modes, including verification obsession and compensatory redundancy. These results provide a practical metric for disentangling reasoning ability from computational waste, enabling more targeted evaluation and diagnosis of LRM efficiency.
Beyond Evidence: Belief-Chain Conditioning for Persuasive Misinformation Debunking Explanation
PDF ↗As AI systems increasingly mediate everyday communication, large language models (LLMs) are expected not only to provide factually accurate responses but also to generate explanations that engage with users’ mental states. We build on the concept of cognitive chains—structured representations of Situation, Clue, Thought, Action, and Emotion inspired by Theory of Mind—to investigate whether conditioning LLM outputs on such belief chains improves explanation quality. Specifically, we evaluate explanations along six reader-perceived dimensions: overall quality, logical correctness, completeness, conciseness, empathy, and agreement. Prior work shows that LLM explanations often default to neutral or uncertain stances, while individuals holding strong false beliefs remain highly resistant to correction. To address this challenge, we instantiate cognitive chains from two perspectives: believers and non-believers of the news claims. Using GPT-4.1 as a role-player across these stances, we find that incorporating believers’ chains improves the perceived quality of explanations for audiences with misinformation-aligned beliefs. Our findings underscore the importance of modeling diverse mental states in explanation generation and provide the first systematic evidence that Theory-of-Mind–based cognitive chains enhance the persuasiveness of explanations in misinformation contexts.
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly expected to support pluralistic alignment, representing diverse human perspectives. However, current methods often induce motivated reasoning: LLMs tend to hallucinate “convenient” facts to forcefully justify a requested stance. To address this, we propose Value-Graph-Consistent Chain-of-Thought (VGC-CoT), a neuro-symbolic framework that enables steerable pluralism without distorting objective reality. We enforce a strict distinction: facts should be shared, while value trade-offs may diverge. Our approach models reasoning as a directed traversal over a multi-perspective graph comprising a fixed factual layer and perspective-specific value layers. By projecting generated CoT paths onto this structure, we align the model with target values while constraining it to a shared factual backbone. Experiments show that our method reduces factual hallucinations by 3\times and improves cross-perspective consistency by 25% compared to standard steerable baselines, paving the way for trustworthy pluralistic AI.
Vulnerability of LLMs’ Stated Belief? LLMs Belief Resistance Check Through Strategic Persuasive Conversation Interventions
PDF ↗Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly employed in various question-answering tasks. However, recent studies showcase that LLMs are susceptible to persuasion and could adopt counterfactual beliefs.We present a systematic evaluation of LLM susceptibility to persuasion under the Source–Message–Channel–Receiver (SMCR) communication framework. Across six mainstream Large Language Models (LLMs) and three domains (factual knowledge, medical QA, and social bias), we analyze how different persuasive strategies influence stated belief stability over multiple interaction turns.We further examine whether verbalized confidence prompting (i.e., eliciting self-reported confidence scores) affects resistance to persuasion.Results show that the smallest model (Llama 3.2-3B) exhibits extreme compliance, with 82.5% of belief changes occurring at the first persuasive turn (average end turn of 1.1–1.4).Contrary to expectations, verbalized confidence prompting increases vulnerability by accelerating belief erosion rather than enhancing robustness. Finally, an exploratory study of adversarial fine-tuning reveals highly model-dependent effectiveness: GPT-4o-mini achieves near-complete robustness (98.6%) and Mistral 7B improves substantially (35.7% \rightarrow 79.3%), but Llama models remain highly susceptible (<14% RQ1) even when fine-tuned on their own failure cases. Together, these findings highlight substantial model-dependent limits of current robustness interventions and offer guidance for developing more trustworthy LLMs[<https://github.com/muyuhuatang/llm_stated_belief>].
Qualitative analysis is critical to understanding human datasets in many social science disciplines. A central method in this process is inductive coding, where researchers identify and interpret codes directly from the datasets themselves. Yet, this exploratory approach poses challenges for meeting methodological expectations (such as "depth" and "variation"), especially as researchers increasingly adopt Generative AI (GAI) for support. Ground-truth-based metrics are insufficient because they contradict the exploratory nature of inductive coding; cluster- or topic-level metrics fail to capture the interpretive, cross-cutting nature of qualitative codes; and manual evaluation can be labor-intensive. This paper presents a theory-informed computational method for measuring inductive coding results from humans and GAI. Our method first merges individual codebooks into an Aggregated Code Space using an LLM-enriched hierarchical clustering algorithm. It then measures each coder’s contribution against the merged result using four novel metrics: Coverage, Overlap, Novelty, and Divergence, designed to capture breadth, consensus, unique contribution, and systematic deviation without assuming ground truth. Through two experiments on a human-coded online conversation dataset, we 1) reveal the merging algorithm’s impact on metrics; 2) validate the metrics’ stability and robustness across multiple runs and different LLMs; and 3) showcase the metrics’ ability to diagnose coding issues, such as excessive or irrelevant (hallucinated) codes. We discuss how these metrics should be interpreted in combination and their current limitations. Our work provides a reliable pathway for ensuring methodological rigor in human-AI qualitative analysis.
Large language model (LLM) approaches to tabular summarization rely on extensive prompt engineering, decomposition pipelines, or entity-level intermediate representations to achieve strong performance. While effective, these strategies are computationally expensive and offer limited insight into how well models maintain state over long, evolving narratives. We introduce SporTabSet, a diagnostic benchmark for long-context tabular summarization across two complementary sports domains that require tracking multiple entities and aggregating statistics under domain-specific rules. Using SporTabSet, we systematically evaluate decomposition-based strategies across several long context LLMs. Results show that although decomposition substantially improves accuracy and numerical fidelity, gains stem mainly from dissecting multi-entity interference rather than improved local arithmetic. Robustness experiments further reveal high sensitivity to surface-level cues with structured failures, including hallucination, omission, and role confusion. Together, these findings identify consistent multi-entity memory as a key bottleneck in long-context table generation, motivating diagnostic evaluation as a prerequisite for scalable, efficient, and reliable tabular summarization models.
Enhancing Factuality through Consensus and Consistency in Summarization Using Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding
PDF ↗Improving the quality of model-generated summaries, especially factuality, the accuracy of a summary with respect to its source content, remains a challenge. While reranking could select the optimal output from multiple generated candidates, it is limited to only using the source as guidance, resulting in unreliable summaries. To address this limitation, we propose ConSUM that reranks candidate summaries by considering two factors: consistency to the source document and consensus among the other candidates. Consensus is established using Minimum Bayes Risk (MBR) decoding over the set of generated summaries, while ensuring consistency by employing factuality-aware metrics that compare the summary against the source. Rigorous testing demonstrates that our system is competitive with existing methods, with human evaluations further confirming that its generated summaries are preferred over those from other systems.
LLMs are Brittle to Simple Code Transformations: Introducing CETBench – A Benchmark for Code-Equivalence Checking
PDF ↗We study how well LLMs can determine whether two programs are functionally equivalent. This is an important problem because benchmarking code equivalence helps assess LLM capability in tasks such as code rewriting and translation. To this end, we introduce CETBench — Code Equivalence with Transformations Benchmark — built from a repository of programs that may solve the same or different tasks. Each dataset instance is created by sampling a program pair and applying a random sequence of predefined code transformations, yielding either equivalent or non-equivalent pairs. Our analysis shows that even simple transformations cause a significant performance drop in state-of-the-art LLMs on code-equivalence checking. These challenges are further amplified in the cross-lingual setting when comparing programs written in different languages. To remedy this, we present a simple fine-tuning-based approach to boost LLM performance on the transformed pairs of programs. Our approach for dataset generation is generic, supporting cross-lingual equivalence checking, the generation of program pairs with varying difficulty levels, and the application of diverse transformations. In our experiments, we perform ablations over the difficulty level of original programs, as well as the kind of transformations used in generating pairs for equivalence checking. Our analysis presents deep insights into the working of LLMs for the task of code-equivalence, and points to the fact that they may still be far from what could be termed as a semantic understanding of the underlying code.
Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents have fundamentally reshaped artificial intelligence by integrating external tools and planning capabilities. While memory mechanisms have emerged as the architectural cornerstone of these systems, current research remains fragmented, oscillating between operating system engineering and cognitive science. This theoretical divide prevents a unified view of technological synthesis and a coherent evolutionary perspective. To bridge this gap, this survey proposes a novel evolutionary framework for LLM agent memory mechanisms, formalizing the development process into three stages: **Storage** (trajectory preservation), **Reflection** (trajectory refinement), and **Experience** (trajectory abstraction). We first formally define these three stages before analyzing the three core drivers of this evolution: the necessity for long-range consistency, the challenges in dynamic environments, and the ultimate goal of continual learning. Furthermore, we specifically explore two transformative mechanisms in the frontier Experience stage: proactive exploration and cross-trajectory abstraction. By synthesizing these disparate views, this work offers robust design principles and a clear roadmap for the development of next-generation LLM agents.
Tokenization fundamentally shapes NLP performance, affecting both efficiency and linguistic fidelity. While Byte Pair Encoding (BPE) underpins most Large Language Models (LLMs), its frequency-driven merges often disregard morpheme boundaries, yielding inconsistent and semantically opaque segmentations in morphologically rich languages. We introduce MorphBPE, a simple extension of BPE that constrains merge operations during tokenizer training to respect morpheme boundaries, while leaving inference unchanged and fully compatible with existing LLM pipelines. We evaluate tokenization quality using two intrinsic metrics, Morphological Consistency F1, which measures whether shared morphemes are assigned consistent token representations, and Morphological Edit Distance, which quantifies alignment with morpheme boundaries. We then train 300M and 1B parameter decoder-only LMs from scratch across four typologically diverse languages, English, Russian, Hungarian, and Arabic, under identical vocabulary sizes and training settings. Across all languages, MorphBPE consistently improves intrinsic morphological coherence and reduces language model cross-entropy, moreover, token length statistics indicate that these gains are not attributable to materially shorter tokens. Finally, on the Belebele multilingual reading comprehension benchmark, MorphBPE yields significant improvements in morphologically rich languages such as Russian and Arabic.
Recovered in Translation: Efficient Pipeline for Automated Translation of Benchmarks and Datasets
PDF ↗The reliability of multilingual Large Language Model (LLM) evaluation is currently compromised by the inconsistent quality of translated benchmarks. Existing resources often suffer from semantic drift and context loss, which can lead to misleading performance metrics. In this work, we present a fully automated framework designed to address these challenges by enabling scalable, high-quality translation of datasets and benchmarks. We demonstrate that adapting test-time compute scaling strategies, specifically Universal Self-Improvement (USI) and our proposed multi-round ranking method, T-RANK, allows for significantly higher quality outputs compared to traditional pipelines. Our framework ensures that benchmarks preserve their original task structure and linguistic nuances during localization. We apply this approach to translate popular benchmarks and datasets into eight Eastern and Southern European languages (Ukrainian, Bulgarian, Slovak, Romanian, Lithuanian, Estonian, Turkish, Greek). Evaluations using both reference-based metrics and LLM-as-a-judge show that our translations surpass existing resources, resulting in more accurate downstream model assessment. We release both the framework and the improved benchmarks to facilitate robust and reproducible multilingual AI development.
Vision-language models (VLMs) have shown promise in graph understanding, but remain limited by input-token constraints, facing scalability bottlenecks and lacking effective mechanisms to coordinate textual and visual modalities. To address these challenges, we propose GraphVista, a unified framework that enhances both scalability and modality coordination in graph understanding. For scalability, GraphVista organizes graph information hierarchically into a lightweight GraphRAG base, which retrieves only task-relevant textual descriptions and high-resolution visual subgraphs, compressing redundant context while preserving key reasoning elements. For modality coordination, GraphVista introduces a planning agent that routes tasks to the most suitable modality—using the text modality for simple property reasoning and the visual modality for local and structurally complex reasoning grounded in explicit topology. Extensive experiments demonstrate that GraphVista scales to large graphs, up to 200{\times} larger than those used in existing benchmarks, and consistently outperforms existing textual, visual, and fusion-based methods, achieving up to 4.4{\times} quality improvement over the state-of-the-art baselines by fully exploiting the complementary strengths of both modalities.
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate decision-making tasks involving personal data sharing, where privacy concerns and prosocial motivations can push choices in opposite directions. Existing evaluations often measure privacy-related attitudes or sharing intentions in isolation, which makes it difficult to determine whether a model’s expressed values jointly predict its downstream data-sharing actions as in real human behaviors. We introduce a context-based assessment protocol that sequentially administers standardized questionnaires for privacy attitudes, prosocialness, and acceptance of data sharing within a bounded, history-carrying session. To evaluate value-action alignments under competing attitudes, we use multi-group structural equation modeling (MGSEM) to identify relations from privacy concerns and prosocialness to data sharing. We propose Value-Action Alignment Rate (VAAR), a human-referenced directional agreement metric that aggregates path-level evidence for expected signs. Across multiple LLMs, we observe stable but model-specific Privacy-PSA-AoDS profiles, and substantial heterogeneity in value-action alignment.
From Passive Metric to Active Signal: The Evolving Role of Uncertainty Quantification in Large Language Models
PDF ↗While Large Language Models (LLMs) show remarkable capabilities, their unreliability remains a critical barrier to deployment in high-stakes domains. This survey charts a functional evolution in addressing this challenge: the evolution of uncertainty from a passive diagnostic metric to an active control signal guiding real-time model behavior. We demonstrate how uncertainty is leveraged as an active control signal across three frontiers: in advanced reasoning to optimize computation and trigger self-correction; in autonomous agents to govern metacognitive decisions about tool use and information seeking; and in reinforcement learning to mitigate reward hacking and enable self-improvement via intrinsic rewards. By grounding these advancements in emerging theoretical frameworks like Bayesian methods and Conformal Prediction, we provide a unified perspective on this transformative trend. This survey provides a comprehensive overview, critical analysis, and practical design patterns, arguing that mastering the new trend of uncertainty is essential for building the next generation of scalable, reliable, and trustworthy AI.