Modern generative models still lack human-level creativity, particularly in multi-branch diversity. Prior approaches to address this problem often incur heavy computation or strong dependency on model architecture. Therefore, we introduce **UAG**(**U**niversal **A**voidance **G**eneration), a model-agnostic and computationally efficient generation strategy that penalizes similarity among previously generated outputs. Thus, UAG can enhance multi-branch diversity across both diffusion and transformer models, with minimal additional computation. In experiments, our method achieves up to 1.9 times higher diversity, runs 4.4 times faster, and requires only 1/64 of the FLOPs compared to state-of-the-art methods.
论文检索
输入标题、作者或关键词,从 100,903 篇学术成果中精准定位
Autonomous agents powered by large language models (LLM-based agents) are capable of using off-the-shelf tools to interact with the environment, solve real-world problems, and boost work efficiency. However, current approaches to enhancing tool use for LLM-based agents primarily focus on post-training fine-tuning or test-time context extension. These methods overlook the fundamental tool knowledge acquisition during the early training phase, where models actually learn and internalize core knowledge representations, restricting model performance on out-of-distribution tool usage. To solve such a problem, we introduce enhancing tool knowledge for LLM-based agents during continuous pre-training (ToolCPT). We identify and bridge a key gap in current LLM training by shifting focus from tool-calling patterns to deep internalization of core tool-knowledge representations. We begin by curating 5.1 million code artifacts from large-scale, high-quality code repositories. These artifacts are selected based on a set of criteria that defines a usable "proxy agent tool", thereby forming a comprehensive agent tool library. For each proxy tool, we then create a detailed playbook covering implementation specifications, core functionalities, interaction protocols with other tools, and illustrative positive and negative examples. This process yields a large-scale tool knowledge corpus comprising 18 billion tokens, which is used to continuously pre-train our model. Experiments show our playbook-enhanced corpus catalyzes deep knowledge internalization, driving the model to notable performance gains on multiple standard benchmarks.
A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words? An Empirical Study of Aggregation Strategies for Visual Financial Document Retrieval
PDF ↗Visual RAG has offered an alternative to traditional RAG. It treats documents as images and uses vision encoders to obtain vision patch tokens. However, hundreds of patch tokens per document create retrieval and storage challenges in a vector database. Practical deployment requires aggregating them into a single vector. This raises a critical question: does single-vector aggregation lose key information in financial documents? We develop a diagnostic benchmark using financial documents where changes in single digits can lead to significant semantic shifts. Our experiments show that single-vector aggregation collapses different documents with almost identical vectors. Metrics show that the patch level detects semantic changes, and confirm that aggregation obscures these details. We identify global texture dominance as the root cause. Our findings are consistent across model scales, retrieval-optimized embeddings, and multiple mitigation strategies, highlighting significant risks for single-vector visual document retrieval in financial applications.
Collaborative Multi-Agent Scripts Generation for Enhancing Imperfect-Information Reasoning in Murder Mystery Games
PDF ↗Vision-language models (VLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in perceptual tasks, yet they degrade in complex multi-hop reasoning under multi-player game settings with imperfect and deceptive information. In this paper, we pick up a representative multi-player task, Murder Mystery Games, which require to infer hidden truths based on partial clues provided by the roles of different intentions. To address this challenge, we propose a collaborative multi-agent framework for evaluating and synthesizing high-quality, role-driven multi-player game scripts, enabling fine-grained interaction patterns tailored to character identities (i.e., murderer vs. innocent). Our system generates rich multimodal contexts—including character backstories, visual/textual clues, and multi-hop reasoning chains—through coordinated agent interactions. We design a two-stage agent-monitored training strategy to enhance the reasoning ability of VLM: (1) Chain-of-Thought based fine-tuning on curated and synthetic datasets that model uncertainty and deception; (2) GRPO-based Reinforcement Learning with agent-monitored reward shaping, encouraging the model to develop character-specific reasoning behaviors and effective multi-modal multi-hop inference. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method significantly boosts the performance of VLM in narrative reasoning, hidden fact extraction, and deception-resilient understanding. Our contributions offer a scalable solution for training and evaluating VLMs under uncertain, adversarial, and socially complex conditions, laying the groundwork for future benchmarks in multimodal multi-hop reasoning under imperfect information.
Previous LLMs-based RL studies typically follow either supervised learning with high annotation costs, or unsupervised paradigms using voting or entropy-based rewards. However, their performance remains far from satisfactory due to the substantial annotation cost and issues such as model collapse or reward hacking. To address these issues, we introduce a new perspective inspired by cognitive learning theory and propose a novel approach called EasyRL. The core of EasyRL is to simulate the human cognitive acquisition curve by integrating reliable knowledge transfer from easy labeled data with a progressive divide-and-conquer strategy that tackles increasingly difficult unlabeled data. Specifically, we initialize a warm-up model using supervised RL with few-shot labeled data. This is followed by a divide-and-conquer pseudo-labeling strategy on difficult unlabeled data, combining consistency-based selection for low-uncertainty cases and reflection-based resolution for medium-uncertainty cases. Finally, difficulty-progressive self-training with iterative pseudo-labeling and RL further strengthens the model’s reasoning capability. EasyRL provides a unified self-evolving framework that facilitates data-efficient post-training of LLMs. Experimental results on mathematical and scientific benchmarks demonstrate that EasyRL, using only 10% of easy labeled data, consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.
Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have demonstrated significant potential in the medical domain, achieving impressive performance on tasks ranging from report generation to visual question answering. However, existing benchmarks predominantly focus on static evaluation, assessing models on isolated data points. This approach neglects a critical aspect of clinical practice: longitudinal analysis, where physicians interpret patient data as a dynamic trajectory to track disease progression and treatment response. To address this gap, we introduce ELTLM, the first benchmark specifically tailored to assess the temporal perception and reasoning capabilities of medical LMMs. Constructed from temporal chest X-rays, ELTLM features a hierarchical task taxonomy comprising Temporal Perception QA and Temporal Reasoning QA, requiring models to detect fine-grained visual changes and infer high-level clinical trends. Our evaluation of state-of-the-art models reveals that while they excel in static scenarios, they struggle significantly with temporal grounding and consistency. ELTLM serves as a vital resource to identify these limitations and guide the development of future time-aware medical AI systems. Our data is available at [ELTLM](https://github.com/ChengFeng233/ELTLM-Bench).
Exploring Layer-wise Information Effectiveness for Post-Training Quantization in Small Language Models
PDF ↗Large language models with billions of parameters are often over-provisioned: many layers contribute little unique information yet dominate the memory and energy footprint during inference. We present LieQ (Layer-wise information effectiveness Quantization), a hardware-native, metric-driven post-training quantization framework that addresses the critical challenge of maintaining accuracy in sub-8B models, model parameters less than 8B, under extreme low-bit compression. LieQ keeps uniform bit-width within each layer while mixing precision across layers, preserving standard multiplication kernels and avoiding irregular memory access, codebooks, or irregular formats at inference time. Our method uncovers a strong correlation between layer-wise functional saliency and representational compactness, revealing that layers with higher training-induced energy concentration are functionally irreplaceable. Leveraging this insight, we propose a purely geometry-driven sensitivity proxy that enables automatic bit-width allocation under a target average-bit budget without expensive gradient updates or inference-based perplexity probing. Under an average weight bit-width approaching two bits per parameter, LieQ consistently reduces the large accuracy gap typically observed for naive uniform 2-bit baselines on Qwen3 and LLaMA3.x families, while retaining standard-kernel efficiency. These properties make LieQ a practical path toward deploying small language models on resource-constrained edge devices. Code will be available at: https://github.com/HeXiao-55/LieQ-official.git.
Lifelong knowledge editing (LKE) aims to incrementally correct factual inaccuracies in large language models (LLMs), but sequential edits can lead to substantial degradation of capabilities. Existing approaches primarily rely on static parameter regularization, which restricts knowledge integration and fails to prevent cumulative capability degradation. We argue that an important source of this degradation lies in the temporal mismatch between locally editable factual knowledge and procedural knowledge, which is gradually acquired, guides task execution, and cannot be reliably updated by rapid edits. To this end, we formulate LKE as a dual-timescale process, explicitly decoupling fast-updating factual knowledge from slow-evolving procedural knowledge. Based on this formulation, we propose CaPEdit, a framework that preserves model capabilities under LKE. It first synthesizes procedural knowledge across successive edits, and subsequently performs parameter updates guided jointly by factual supervision and the synthesized procedural signal. To ensure stability under long edit sequences, CaPEdit is trained via a hybrid optimization scheme, combining step-wise updates for rapid factual correction with trajectory-level optimization to facilitate gradual procedural adaptation. Experiments demonstrate that CaPEdit improves capability preservation across all fundamental capabilities by 49.78%, achieves superior editing performance, and requires only 18.07% of the editing time of most existing methods.
Current benchmarks are inadequate for evaluating progress in reinforcement learning (RL) for large language models (LLMs). Despite recent benchmark gains reported for RL, we find that training on these benchmarks’ training sets achieves nearly the same performance as training directly on the test sets, suggesting that the benchmarks cannot reliably separate further progress. To study this phenomenon, we introduce a diagnostic suite and the Oracle Performance Gap (OPG) metric that quantifies the performance difference between training on the train split versus the test split of a benchmark. We further analyze this phenomenon with stress tests and find that, despite strong benchmark scores, existing RL methods struggle to generalize across distribution shifts, varying levels of difficulty, and counterfactual scenarios: shortcomings that current benchmarks fail to reveal. We conclude that current benchmarks are insufficient for evaluating generalization and propose three core principles for designing more faithful benchmarks: sufficient difficulty, balanced evaluation, and distributional robustness.
As code large language models (LLMs) evolve into tool-interactive agents via the Model Context Protocol (MCP), their generalization is increasingly limited by low-quality synthetic data and the diminishing returns of quantity scaling; moreover, quantity-centric scaling exhibits an early bottleneck that underutilizes trajectory data. We propose TDScaling, a Trajectory Diversity Scaling-based data synthesis framework for code agents that scales performance through diversity rather than raw volume. Moreover, TDScaling is more data-efficient: under a fixed training budget, increasing trajectory diversity yields larger gains than adding more trajectories, improving the performance-cost trade-off for agent training. TDScaling integrates four innovations: (1) a Business Cluster mechanism that captures real-service logical dependencies; (2) a Blueprint-driven multi-agent paradigm that enforces trajectory coherence; (3) an adaptive evolution mechanism that steers synthesis toward long-tail scenarios using Domain Entropy, Reasoning Mode Entropy, and Cumulative Action Complexity to prevent mode collapse; and (4) a sandboxed code tool that mitigates catastrophic forgetting of intrinsic coding capabilities. Experiments on general tool-use benchmarks (BFCL, \tau^2-Bench) and code agent tasks (RebenchT, CodeCI, BIRD) demonstrate a win-win outcome: TDScaling improves both tool-use generalization and inherent coding proficiency. Crucially, we show that trajectory diversity scaling attains a substantially higher performance ceiling than quantity scaling, establishing a resource-efficient paradigm for training robust code agents under data bottlenecks.
In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in the medical domain. However, existing medical benchmarks suffer from performance saturation and are predominantly derived from medical exam questions, which fail to reflect the complexity of real-world clinical scenarios.To bridge this gap, we introduce ClinBench, a challenging benchmark based on authentic clinical cases sourced from authoritative medical journals. Each question retains the complete patient information and clinical test results from the original case, effectively simulating real-world clinical practice. Additionally, we implement a rigorous human review process involving medical experts to ensure the quality and reliability of the benchmark. ClinBench supports both textual and multimodal evaluation formats, covering 11 medical specialties with over 2,000 questions, including a dedicated rare disease track, providing a comprehensive resource for assessing the medical reasoning capabilities of LLMs. We evaluate the performance of over 20 open-source and proprietary LLMs and benchmark them against human medical experts. Our findings reveal that human experts still retain an advantage within their specialized fields, while LLMs demonstrate superior overall performance on a broader range of medical specialties.
AutoPKG: An Automated Framework for Dynamic E-commerce Product-Attribute Knowledge Graph Construction
PDF ↗Product attribute extraction in e-commerce is bottlenecked by ontologies that are inconsistent, incomplete, and costly to maintain. We present AutoPKG, a multi-agent Large Language Model (LLM) framework that automatically constructs a Product-attribute Knowledge Graph (PKG) from multimodal product content. AutoPKG induces product types and type-specific attribute keys on demand, extracts attribute values from text and images, and consolidates updates through a centralized decision agent that maintains a globally consistent canonical graph. We also propose an evaluation protocol for dynamic PKGs that measures type/key validity and consolidation quality, as well as edge-level accuracy for value assertions after canonicalization. On a large real-world marketplace catalog dataset from Lazada (Alibaba), AutoPKG achieves up to 0.953 Weighted Knowledge Efficiency (WKE) for product types, 0.724 WKE for attribute keys, and 0.531 edge-level F1 for multimodal value extraction. Across three public benchmarks, we improve edge-level exact-match F1 by 0.152 and yield a 0.208 precision gain on the attribute extraction application. Online A/B tests show that AutoPKG-derived attributes increase Gross Merchandise Value (GMV) in Badge (+3.81%), Search (+5.32%), and Recommendation (+7.89%), supporting AutoPKG’s practical value in production.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are widely used to mitigate the stateless nature of Large Language Models (LLMs) in long-term and personalized interactions by incorporating external memory. However, existing approaches often prioritize memory organization, such as knowledge graphs, while overlooking a critical semantic gap between implicit, intent-driven queries and explicit, narrative-based memories. To bridge this gap, we propose QueryLink, a novel framework that leverages Query-Memory Alignment to project both queries and memories into a shared semantic space. It significantly boosts recall by facilitating multi-grained retrieval of semantically relevant information. To further enhance memory retrieval, we leverage Coherent Memory Chunking, a mechanism that processes memories in multi-turn dialogue units, preserving semantic integrity, rather than relying on fixed-size segments. Extensive experiments on the LoCoMo and LongMemEval benchmark demonstrate that QueryLink significantly outperforms SOTA methods, achieving at least a 7% improvement in reasoning accuracy (measured by LLM). Additionally, QueryLink can be integrated as a plug-and-play component to boost existing vector-based systems like A-MEM, leading to improvements of over 6% in both F1 and B1 scores.The code is available at https://github.com/Dontplay0112/querylink.
SEC-FinTables: Evaluating Large Language Models for Detecting Logical Inconsistencies on Tabular Data
PDF ↗Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains reliant on tabular data (e.g., financial reporting), where undetected logical inconsistencies such as mismatched totals and components can lead to critical errors. Yet, the ability of LLMs to identify such inconsistencies remains poorly understood, hindered by the absence of standardized evaluation frameworks and cell-level annotated datasets. To bridge this gap, we propose a comprehensive benchmark SEC-Fintables comprising 103,395 real-world and error-injected table instances, alongside a novel evaluation protocol that decomposes inconsistency detection into granular sub-tasks. Through evaluating both proprietary and open-source LLMs on SEC-Fintables, we find that contemporary LLMs exhibit only partial competence in detecting logical inconsistencies. Our study reveals key limitations and improvement opportunities for LLMs. We believe SEC-Fintables and our evaluation protocol can serve as a practical resource for advancing reliable inconsistency detection of LLMs in tabular reasoning. We release SEC-Fintables at https://github.com/XIEFOX/SEC-Fintables.
Designing proteins that satisfy natural language functional requirements is a central goal in protein engineering. A straightforward baseline is to fine-tune generic instruction-tuned LLMs as direct text-to-sequence generators, but this is data- and compute-hungry. With limited supervision, LLMs can produce coherent plans in text yet fail to reliably realize them as sequences. This plan–execute gap motivates ProtoCycle, an agentic framework for protein design that uses LLMs primarily to drive a multi-round, feedback-driven decision cycle. ProtoCycle couples an LLM planner with a lightweight tool environment designed to emulate the iterative workflow of human protein engineers and uses LLM-driven reflection on tool feedback to revise plans. Trained with supervised trajectories and online reinforcement learning, ProtoCycle achieves strong language alignment while maintaining competitive foldability, and ablations show that reflection substantially improves sequence quality.
While recent studies have increasingly emphasized the role of reflection in code repair tasks, existing benchmarks still target the repair generation capability of LLMs, lacking fine-grained evaluation of reflection generation capability. To this end, we propose Code Reffix, a benchmark featuring an automated pipeline with oracle reflections and a dual-task protocol to decouple the evaluation of reflection from repair. Through extensive experiments on 14 LLMs and fine-tuning analysis, we aim to pinpoint performance bottlenecks of code repair, quantify reflection quality, and verify the value of reflection optimization. Evaluations reveal that underperforming reflection capabilities of small-scale LLMs remain a major bottleneck for code repair. By quantifying this gap, Code Reffix provides a critical foundation for optimizing LLMs to achieve superior repair performance.
Understanding and reasoning with abstractive information from the visual modality presents significant challenges for current multi-modal large language models (MLLMs). Among the various forms of abstractive information, Multi-Modal Relational Knowledge (MMRK), which represents abstract relational structures between multi-modal entities using node-edge formats, remains largely under-explored. In particular, STructured and Abstractive Reasoning (STAR) on such data has received little attention from the research community. To bridge the dual gaps in large-scale high-quality data and capability enhancement methodologies, this paper makes the following key contributions: (i). An automatic STAR data engine to synthesize images with MMRK to build multi-modal instructions with reliable chain-of-thought thinking for various STAR tasks and (ii). A comprehsive two-stage training framework, accompanied by knowledge-informed GRPO and a suite of evaluation protocols tailored to different STAR tasks. Based upon these contributions, we introduce STAR-64K, a dataset comprising 64K high-quality multi-modal instruction samples, and conduct experiments across 8 open-source MLLMs. Experimental results show that our two-stage enhancement framework enables smaller 3B/7B models to significantly outperform GPT-4o in STAR. Additionally, we provide in-depth analysis regarding the effectiveness of various designs, data transferability, and scalability.
Daily scenarios are characterized by visual richness, requiring Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to filter noise and identify decisive visual clues for accurate reasoning. Yet, current benchmarks predominantly aim at evaluating MLLMs’ pre-existing knowledge or perceptual understanding, often neglecting the critical capability of reasoning. To bridge this gap, we introduce DailyClue, a benchmark designed for visual clue-driven reasoning in daily scenarios. Our construction is guided by two core principles: (1) strict grounding in authentic daily activities, and (2) challenging query design that necessitates more than surface-level perception. Instead of simple recognition, our questions compel MLLMs to actively explore suitable visual clues and leverage them for subsequent reasoning. To this end, we curate a comprehensive dataset spanning four major daily domains and 16 distinct subtasks. Comprehensive evaluation across MLLMs and agentic models underscores the formidable challenge posed by our benchmark. Our analysis reveals several critical insights, emphasizing that the accurate identification of visual clues is essential for robust reasoning.
Mathematical reasoning has long been a key benchmark for evaluating large language models. Although substantial progress has been made on math word problems, the need for reasoning over tabular data in real-world applications has been overlooked. For instance, applications such as business intelligence demand not only multi-step numerical reasoning with tables but also robustness to incomplete or inconsistent information. However, comprehensive evaluation in this area is severely limited, constrained by the reliance on manually collected tables that are difficult to scale and the lack of coverage for potential traps encountered in real-world scenarios. To address this problem, we propose AutoT2T, a neuro-symbolic framework that controllably transforms math word problems into scalable and verified tabular reasoning tasks. Building on this pipeline, we develop TabularMath, a benchmark comprising four subsets that include both text-based and image-based tables, covering table complexity, table quality, and table representation dimensions. Our study reveals three key observations: (1) Table complexity and reasoning difficulty impact reasoning performance jointly; (2) Low-quality tables pose severe risks to reliable reasoning in current LLMs; (3) Different table modalities show similar trends, with text-based tables typically being easier for models to reason over. In-depth analyses are conducted for each observation to guide future research.
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances large language models (LLMs) by conditioning generation on retrieved external documents, but the effect of retrieved context is often non-trivial. In realistic retrieval settings, the retrieved document set often contains a mixture of documents that vary in relevance and usefulness. While prior work has largely examined these phenomena through output behavior, little is known about how retrieved context shapes the internal representations that mediate information integration in RAG. In this work, we study RAG through the lens of latent representations. We systematically analyze how different types of retrieved documents affect the hidden states of LLMs, and how these internal representation shifts relate to downstream generation behavior. Across four question-answering datasets and three LLMs, we analyze internal representations under controlled single- and multi-document settings. Our results reveal how context relevancy and layer-wise processing influence internal representations, providing explanations of LLMs’ output behaviors and insights for RAG system design.