论文检索

Zekun Li, Jifan Yu, Haoxuan Li, Ye He, Daniel Zhang-Li, Shangqing Tu, Joy Jia Yin Lim, Yikun Jiang, Jiaxin Yuan, Yu Zhang

Accurate assessment of critical thinking is historically limited by the Intention Behavior Gap in psychology: the disconnect between what individuals self-reported disposition and their actual practical behaviors. We try to bridge this gap with MASA (Multi-Agent Scenario-based Assessment), a framework that operationalizes cognitive assessment into an interpretable and interactive multi-agent workflow with Assessment Chain-of-Thought (AsCoT). Validating on both large-scale simulations (N=1,161) and human participants (N=70), we find that MASA aligns better with human expert ratings (r=0.882) than traditional gold-standard inventories (r=0.720), with an average cost of only 0.41 per participant. These results suggest that by shifting from self-report inventory to behavior-grounded dialogue, MASA offers a more accurate, cost-effective, and transparent solution for real-world cognitive evaluation.

Shaonan Liu, Guo Yu, Xiaoling Luo, Shiyi Zheng, Jie Liu, Wenting Chen, Linlin Shen

Medical Multimodal Large Language Models (Med-MLLMs) require egocentric clinical intent understanding for real-world deployment, yet existing benchmarks fail to evaluate this critical capability. We introduce MedGaze-Bench, the first benchmark leveraging clinician gaze as a Cognitive Cursor to assess intent understanding across surgery, emergency simulation, and diagnostic interpretation. Our benchmark addresses three fundamental challenges: visual homogeneity of anatomical structures, strict temporal-causal dependencies in clinical workflows, and implicit adherence to safety protocols. We propose a Three-Dimensional Clinical Intent Framework evaluating: (1) Spatial Intent—discriminating precise targets amid visual noise, (2) Temporal Intent—inferring causal rationale through retrospective and prospective reasoning, and (3) Standard Intent—verifying protocol compliance through safety checks. Beyond accuracy metrics, we introduce Trap QA mechanisms to stress-test clinical reliability by penalizing hallucinations and cognitive sycophancy. Experiments reveal current MLLMs struggle with egocentric intent due to over-reliance on global features, leading to fabricated observations and uncritical acceptance of invalid instructions.

Xiaoyu Xu, Yulan Pan, Xiaosong Yuan, Zhihong Shen, Minghao Su, Yuanhao Su, Xiaofeng Zhang

Large reasoning models (LRMs) that generate long chains of thought now perform well on multi-step math, science, and coding tasks. However, their behavior is still unstable and hard to interpret, and existing analysis tools struggle with such long, structured reasoning traces. We introduce Step-Saliency, which pools attention–gradient scores into step-to-step maps along the question–thinking–summary trajectory. Across several models, Step-Saliency reveals two recurring information-flow failures: Shallow Lock-in, where shallow layers over-focus on the current step and barely use earlier context, and Deep Decay, where deep layers gradually lose saliency on the thinking segment and the summary increasingly attends to itself and the last few steps. Motivated by these patterns, we propose StepFlow, a saliency-inspired test-time intervention that adjusts shallow saliency patterns measured by Step-Saliency via Odds-Equal Bridge and adds a small step-level residual in deep layers via Step Momentum Injection. StepFlow improves accuracy on math, science, and coding tasks across multiple LRMs without retraining, indicating that repairing information flow can recover part of their missing reasoning performance.

Xiaowei Zhu, Yubing Ren, Fang Fang, Shi Wang, Yanan Cao, Li Guo

The rapid advancement of large language models has increasingly blurred the boundary between human-written and AI-generated text, raising societal risks such as misinformation dissemination, authorship ambiguity, and threats to intellectual property rights. These concerns highlight the urgent need for effective and reliable detection methods. While existing training-free approaches often achieve strong performance by aggregating token-level signals into a global score, they typically assume uniform token contributions, making them less robust under short sequences or localized token modifications. To address these limitations, we propose Exons-Detect, a training-free method for AI-generated text detection based on an exon-aware token reweighting perspective. Exons-Detect identifies and amplifies informative exonic tokens by measuring hidden-state discrepancy under a dual-model setting, and computes an interpretable translation score from the resulting importance-weighted token sequence. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that Exons-Detect achieves state-of-the-art detection performance and exhibits strong robustness to adversarial attacks and varying input lengths. In particular, it attains a 2.2% relative improvement in average AUROC over the strongest prior baseline on DetectRL.

Shize Zhou, Peiyu Liu, Lirong Fu, Tong Ye, Wenhai Wang

Binary Code Similarity Detection (BCSD) plays a vital role in various security applications, including vulnerability identification, malware analysis, and code plagiarism detection. With the growing adoption of deep neural networks (DNNs), substantial progress has been made in recognizing and classifying similar code segments. However, DNN-based BCSD methods often exhibit low accuracy and robustness because they struggle to capture fine-grained and high-level program semantics. In contrast, such semantics are typically captured through natural language interpretations of source code by large language models (LLMs). Yet, LLM-based BCSD methods are constrained by their large model sizes and high inference latency. To alleviate these limitations, this paper proposes BinSKD. The key idea is to leverage an LLM-based BCSD method as the teacher model and transfer its knowledge of high-level program semantics to various DNN-based student models. Specifically, to avoid propagating errors from the teacher to the student, we introduce selective distillation, selecting targets with accurate semantics according to their detection retrieval. In addition, to mitigate the noise introduced by a number of negative samples during distillation, we further propose discrepancy-weighted sampling to focus on the sampleswhere the student’s prediction notably deviates from the teacher’s. Our experiments show that BinSKD yields Recall@1 improvements of 14.5%–91.2% for DNN-based BCSD methods and enables HermesSim to match the teacher’s performance with orders-of-magnitude efficiency.

Zhihui Chen, Kai He, Qingyuan Lei, Bin Pu, Jian Zhang, Yuling Xu, Mengling Feng

Text-guided image editors can now manipulate authentic medical scans with high fidelity, enabling lesion implantation/removal that threatens clinical trust and safety. Existing defenses are inadequate for healthcare. Medical detectors are largely black-box, while MLLM-based explainers are typically post-hoc, lack medical expertise, and may hallucinate evidence on ambiguous cases. We present MedForge, a data-and-method solution for pre-hoc, evidence-grounded medical forgery detection. We introduce MedForge-90K, a large-scale benchmark of realistic lesion edits across 19 pathologies with expert-guided reasoning supervision via doctor inspection guidelines and gold edit locations. Building on it, MedForge-Reasoner performs localize-then-analyze reasoning, predicting suspicious regions before producing a verdict, and is further aligned with Forgery-aware GSPO to strengthen grounding and reduce hallucinations. Experiments demonstrate state-of-the-art detection accuracy and trustworthy, expert-aligned explanations.

Mengxue Yang, Jinming Li, Chun Yang, Jiaqi Zhu, Jiafan Li, Guanhua Zhang, Ying Li

N-ary knowledge graph completion (KGC) aims to infer missing components in facts with multiple entities under distinct semantic roles, commonly formulated as a knowledge hypergraph link prediction task. Most embedding-based approaches score individual hyperedges relying on enriched structural representations, but overlook intermediate propagation states containing complementary local and global structural evidence. Despite their capability to generate chain-of-thought (CoT) representations for the classical KGC task, large language models (LLMs) struggle with hypergraph structure involving multiple facts, while current hypergraph QA methods only provide LLMs with a single query signal rather than path-level evidence. These limitations hinder the transferability of existing methods, especially those leveraging LLMs, to solve the knowledge hypergraph link prediction problem. To bridge this gap, we propose HyperCoT, a structure-aware approach that models multi-hop structural reasoning as a depth-sensitive progressive evidence accumulation process. It constructs a Graphical Chain-of-Thought (Graph-CoT) by aggregating role-aware hyperedge states along strongly correlated reasoning paths, and injects the resulting path-level structural evidence into each token in query and candidate entities to prompt LLMs. Experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that HyperCoT consistently outperforms strong n-ary KGC baselines, particularly in high arity and structural sparsity scenarios, meanwhile yielding interpretable multi-hop reasoning traces.

Hao Wang, Ziyi Ni, Huacan Wang, Pin Lyu, Lei Sha

Current defenses for Large Language Models (LLMs) often suffer from a ”memory gap”: parameter-modifying methods are computationally rigid, while inference-time filters cannot retain or reuse defense knowledge across interactions. To address this, we propose SafetyMem, a novel framework that secures LLMs through a dual-component safety memory system. SafetyMem consists of Semantic Safety Memory (SSM), which consolidates diverse jailbreak attempts into a structured knowledge base of attack patterns, and Episodic Safety Memory (ESM), which maintains an evolving set of procedural rules refined from historical detection failures. Unlike static defenses, SafetyMem allows the model to ”remember” and adapt to emerging adversarial strategies without parameter retraining. To further enhance robustness, we introduce an adversarial memory expansion mechanism that proactively generates challenging variants to solidify these memories. Experiments on standard and stealthy jailbreak benchmarks show that SafetyMem substantially reduces attack success rates while preserving efficiency and interpretability, consistently outperforming state-of-the-art baselines across multiple LLMs.

Chuang Zhou, Zheng Yuan, Linhao Luo, Zhaozhuo Xu, Yilin Xiao, Junnan Dong, Siyu An, di Yin, Xing Sun, Xiao Huang

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has long been a promising paradigm for enhancing large language models (LLMs) with external knowledge. Traditional embedding-based methods for graph construction can capture semantic similarity but struggle to establish fine-grained, interpretable logical relationships. Recently, Graph-enhanced RAG (GraphRAG) has gained increasing popularity for its capability in modeling logical relationships. However, graph construction requires extensive token consumption for triple extraction and summarization, making it costly and slow. Accordingly, we propose MeshRAG, a novel framework for mining efficient structures via hashing to enhance RAG. We adopt an inductive paradigm in which global graph structure emerges from local hash collisions rather than explicit symbolic extraction. By replacing neural embedding search with lightweight and bitwise operations, MeshRAG automates a simple and rapid graph construction process. Furthermore, the hash collision mechanism provides transparent evidence for logical connections and retrieval decisions. Experimental results show that MeshRAG outperforms existing baselines, while its graph construction requires no GPU resources or token budget and can structure over ten thousand chunks in a few minutes.

Mingming Sun, Runze Jiang, Zhu Zhangchenxi, Minlong Peng, Yunfeng Cai

Structural understanding of natural language requires explicit recovery of internal meaning structures (entities, facts, nested relations), yet current structural-analytic tasks are fragmented by inconsistent task requirements across datasets. We investigate the problem of robust cross-task structural understanding under heterogeneous requirements across structural-analytic tasks and outline a perspective called Analytic NLP in which tasks can be reformulated into a representation-then-decision paradigm. In this paper, we suggest a solution for the representation layer, called Lingua-Graph, which explicitly captures entities, facts, and relations. By representing predictions as explicit graphs with labeled nodes and edges, Lingua-Graph also improves interpretability, enabling transparent inspection and error analysis of intermediate meaning structures. We construct a labeled Lingua-Graph dataset and train a baseline parser. Experiments show that Lingua-Graph provides substantially higher entity-structure hostability than alternative representations on average, and OpenIE systems based on Lingua-Graph achieve superior performance on three benchmarks, demonstrating that better intermediate structures translate into downstream gains. The data, code and the trained model are publicly released at https://github.com/rudaoshi/Lingua.

Yuchong Chen, Bowei Zou, Yuhan Chen, Yifan Fan, Xinyu Li, Shujun Cao, Yu Hong

Visual questions are often ambiguous: the same image–question pair may admit multiple valid answers depending on which region is referenced. However, current Visual Question Answering (VQA) systems typically collapse this ambiguity, committing to a single interpretation during decoding and evaluation. In this work, we study visual question ambiguity from a grounded, region-centric perspective. We operationalize ambiguity as the existence of multiple distinct answer-supporting regions in an image, each independently yielding a valid answer. This formulation makes ambiguity observable without requiring exhaustive multi-answer annotations. Based on this definition, we conduct a systematic empirical study of state-of-the-art Visual Large Language Models (VLLMs). We find that, under default decoding, VLLMs consistently under-report ambiguity—even when multiple valid visual groundings are present. Importantly, probing model hidden states reveals that ambiguity-related signals are already encoded in their internal representations, despite not being reliably expressed in outputs. Finally, we show that selectively activating multi-focus answering based on these signals can recover additional valid answers while avoiding excessive hallucination. Together, our results suggest that ambiguity in VQA is not merely an annotation artifact or capability limitation, but a property that VLLMs internally recognize yet often fail to surface under standard decoding assumptions.

Xuwei Tan, Yao Ma, Xueru Zhang

Detecting fraud in financial transactions typically relies on tabular models that demand heavy feature engineering to handle high-dimensional data and offer limited interpretability, making it difficult for humans to understand predictions. Large Language Models (LLMs), in contrast, can produce human-readable explanations and facilitate feature analysis, potentially reducing the manual workload of fraud analysts and informing system refinements. However, they perform poorly when applied directly to tabular fraud detection due to the difficulty of reasoning over many features, the extreme class imbalance, and the absence of contextual information. To bridge this gap, we introduce FinFRE-RAG, a two-stage approach that applies importance-guided feature reduction to serialize a compact subset of numeric/categorical attributes into natural language and performs retrieval-augmented in-context learning over label-aware, instance-level exemplars. Across four public fraud datasets and three families of open-weight LLMs, FinFRE-RAG substantially improves F1/MCC over direct prompting and is competitive with strong tabular baselines in several settings. Although these LLMs still lag behind specialized classifiers, they narrow the performance gap and provide interpretable rationales, highlighting their value as assistive tools in fraud analysis.

Yixin Xiang, Yunshan Ma, Xiaoyu Du, Yibing Chen, Yanxin Zhang, Jinhui Tang

Document Question Answering (DQA) involves generating answers from a document based on a user’s query, representing a key task in document understanding. This task requires interpreting visual layouts, which has prompted recent studies to adopt multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) that processes page images for answer generation. However, in multimodal RAG, visual DQA struggles to utilize a large number of images effectively, as the retrieval stage often retains only a few candidate pages (e.g., Top-4), causing informative but less visually salient content to be overlooked in favor of common yet low-information pages. To address this issue, we propose a Multi-Armed Bandit–based DQA framework (MAB-DQA) to explicitly model the varying importance of multiple implicit aspects in a query. Specifically, MAB-DQA decomposes a query into aspect-aware subqueries and retrieves an aspect-specific candidate set for each. It treats each subquery as an arm and uses preliminary reasoning results from a small number of representative pages as reward signals to estimate aspect utility. Guided by an exploration–exploitation policy, MAB-DQA dynamically reallocates retrieval budgets toward high-value aspects. With the most informative pages and their correlations, MAB-DQA generates the expected results. On four benchmarks, MAB-DQA shows an average improvement of 5%-18% over the state-of-the-art method, consistently enhancing document understanding. Codes are available at https://github.com/ElephantOH/MAB-DQA.

Jin Liu, Yunpeng Liu, Keyi Wang, Jie Shi, Xiao Xu, Wenkang Huang, Xingzhong Xu, Xin Liang, Yanghua Xiao

Insurance claims adjudication demands not only accurate decisions but also interpretable reasoning grounded in policy clauses. However, existing benchmarks are limited to information retrieval or simple multiple-choice setups, which fail to require step-by-step inferences from facts to conclusions. To address this gap, we introduce InsLogicBench, a benchmark providing complete reasoning traces that link factual inputs, relevant policy clauses, and final verdicts. We construct the dataset using a controllable synthesis framework based on the Nested Toulmin Model. By capturing the defeasible logic of insurance policies through hierarchical truth assignment and enforcing validity via consistency verification, we ensure interpretability and logical rigor across generated examples. We evaluate eight Large Language Models (LLMs) on InsLogicBench. Results show significant difficulties in handling exception clauses and verifying missing conditions. Notably, models often produce correct final decisions but fail to provide precise justifications, highlighting a critical discrepancy between their decision accuracy and logical reasoning capabilities.

Yancui Li, Xiaoyu Zhou, Guoyi Miao, Fang Kong

Classroom discourse analysis is critical for tracing cognitive restructuring, yet existing research predominantly focuses on Dialogue Acts (DA), overlooking the deeper dimension of Opinion Evolution (OE). In this paper, we formally define the task of Classroom Opinion Evolution Recognition and introduce the Classroom Opinion Evolution Dataset (COED). Addressing the "Accuracy-Cost-Data" trilemma in real-world educational scenarios and the "overconfidence" failure mode of traditional confidence-based cascading systems on long-tail samples, we propose the Multi-task Enhanced Cascade Hybrid (MECH) framework. Grounded in the CODA (Continuous Opinions and Discrete Actions) theory, MECH conceptually translates the "Action-Opinion" dualism into a risk-aware routing mechanism. Instead of relying solely on prediction confidence, this mechanism utilizes high-risk argumentative DA signals derived from multi-task learning to construct a "semantic safety net" effectively routing implicit or ambiguous samples to a Large Language Model for reasoning. Experimental results demonstrate that MECH achieves a state-of-the-art accuracy of 78.55% while reducing API costs by 44.4%. Furthermore, the framework exhibits robustness in few-shot scenarios (using only 20% of data), offering a cost-effective and interpretable solution for large-scale educational dialogue analysis. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/ywh24284-code/MECH.

Shaoning Sun, Mingzhu Cai, Huang He, Bingjin Chen, Siqi Bao, Yujiu Yang, Hua Wu, Haifeng Wang

Language model families exhibit striking disparity in their capacity to benefit from reinforcement learning: under identical training, models like Qwen achieve substantial gains, while others like Llama yield limited improvements. Complementing data-centric approaches, we reveal that this disparity reflects a hidden structural property: **distributional clarity** in probability space. Through a three-stage analysis—from phenomenon to mechanism to interpretation—we uncover that RL-friendly models exhibit intra-class compactness and inter-class separation in their probability assignments to correct vs. incorrect responses. We quantify this clarity using the **Silhouette Coefficient** (S) and demonstrate that (1) high S correlates strongly with RL performance; (2) low S is associated with severe logic errors and reasoning instability. To confirm this property, we introduce a Silhouette-Aware Reweighting strategy that prioritizes low-S samples during training. Experiments across six mathematical benchmarks show consistent improvements across all model families, with gains up to 5.9 points on AIME24. Our work establishes distributional clarity as a fundamental, trainable property underlying RL-Friendliness.

Peichun Hua, Hao Li, Shanghao Shi, Zhiyuan Yu, Ning Zhang

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) are vulnerable to a growing array of multimodal jailbreak attacks, necessitating defenses that are both generalizable to novel threats and efficient for practical deployment. Many current strategies fall short, either targeting specific attack patterns, which limits generalization, or imposing high computational overhead. While lightweight anomaly-detection methods offer a promising direction, we find that their common one-class design tends to confuse unseen benign inputs with malicious ones, leading to unreliable over-rejection. To address this, we propose Representational Contrastive Scoring (RCS), a framework built on a key insight: the most potent safety signals reside within the LVLM’s own internal representations. Our approach inspects the internal geometry of these representations, learning a lightweight projection to maximally separate benign and malicious inputs in safety-critical layers. This enables a simple yet powerful contrastive score that differentiates true malicious intent from mere distribution shift. Our instantiations, MCD (Mahalanobis Contrastive Detection) and KCD (K-nearest Contrastive Detection), achieve state-of-the-art performance on a challenging evaluation protocol designed to test generalization to unseen attack types. This work demonstrates that effective jailbreak detection can be achieved by applying simple, interpretable statistical methods to the internal representations, offering a practical path towards safer LVLM deployment.

Tianjiao Li, Kai Zhao, Xiang Li, Yang Liu, Huyang Sun

Traditional Video Quality Assessment (VQA) focuses narrowly on aesthetic fidelity, overlooking the complex social dynamics that define quality in User-Generated Content (UGC). In this work, we propose a paradigm shift from signal-centric metrics to human-centric resonance assessment. We introduce CASTER (Community-Aware Assessment of Social Textual Engagement and Resonance), a new task that evaluates whether a UGC item achieves positive community resonance based on its multimodal attributes rather than visual quality alone. To address this, we present MEDEA (Multimodal Engagement-Driven Evaluation Architecture), which introduces a novel Social Chain-of-Thought (Social-CoT) mechanism. Unlike traditional logical CoT, Social-CoT performs multimodal perspective-taking, instantiating diverse viewer personas to simulate collective cognitive and emotional reactions (i.e., the "community mind") before deriving a quality judgment. MEDEA is trained via a two-stage approach involving supervised fine-tuning and process-supervised reinforcement learning with Social Alignment Reward to ensure reasoning paths are grounded in authentic human social cognition. To support this task, we release CASTER-Bench, a comprehensive human-annotated benchmark covering diverse UGC categories. Experiments demonstrate that MEDEA significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on CASTER-Bench while providing interpretable and empathetic reasoning paths that align with real community feedback.

Yeji Park, Jiwon Tark, Taesik Gong

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used by end users, yet existing personalization methods relying on static profiles or text-only signals fail to capture query-specific expertise variation. We present ExPerT, a query-wise personalization framework that adapts LLM responses to users’ query domain expertise by combining semantic and behavioral cues. ExPerT consists of two key components: (i) a semantic–behavioral expertise inference module that jointly interprets query text and keystroke dynamics via in-context LLM prompting, and (ii) an expertise-conditioned response generation that adapts the level of detail, terminology, and conceptual complexity. Our user study with 40 participants and 1270 queries demonstrated that ExPerT reduced expertise inference error by 65.7% compared to the strongest baseline (MAE = 0.398 vs. 1.162) and improved response satisfaction by 17.52% (from 3.71 to 4.36) on a 5-point Likert scale.

Xue Zhang, Yunlong Liang, Fandong Meng, Songming Zhang, Kaiyu Huang, Yufeng Chen, Xu Jinan, Jie Zhou

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have achieved remarkable performance on complex reasoning tasks by adopting the “think-then-answer” paradigm, which enhances both accuracy and interpretability. However, current LRMs exhibit two critical limitations when processing non-English languages: (1) They often struggle to maintain input-output language consistency; (2) They generally perform poorly with wrong reasoning paths and lower answer accuracy compared to English. These limitations significantly compromise the interpretability of reasoning processes and degrade the user experience for non-English speakers, hindering the global deployment of LRMs. To address these limitations, we propose M-Thinker, which is trained by the GRPO algorithm that involves a Language Consistency (LC) reward and a novel Cross-lingual Thinking Alignment (CTA) reward. Specifically, the LC reward defines a strict constraint on the language consistency between the input, thought, and answer. Besides, the CTA reward compares the model’s non-English reasoning paths with its English reasoning path to transfer its own reasoning capability from English to non-English languages. Through an iterative RL procedure, our M-Thinker-1.5B/4B/7B models not only achieve nearly 100% language consistency and superior performance on two multilingual benchmarks (MMATH and PolyMath), but also exhibit excellent generalization on out-of-domain languages.