Language models are increasingly deployed in interactive settings where users reason about facts over time rather than in isolation.In such scenarios, correct behavior requires models to maintain and update implicit temporal assumptions established earlier in a conversation. We study this challenge through the lens of temporal scope stability: the ability to preserve, override, or transfer time-scoped factual context across dialogue turns. We introduce ChronoScope, a large-scale diagnostic benchmark designed to isolate temporal scope behavior in controlled multi-turn interactions, comprising over one million deterministically generated question chains grounded in Wikidata. ChronoScope evaluates whether models can correctly retain inferred temporal scope when follow-up questions omit explicit time references, spanning implicit carryover, explicit scope switching, cross-entity transfer, and longer temporal trajectories.Through extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art language models, we find that temporal scope stability is frequently violated in controlled multi-turn settings, with models often drifting toward present-day assumptions despite correct underlying knowledge.These failures intensify with interaction length and persist even under oracle context conditions, revealing a gap between single-turn factual accuracy and coherent temporal reasoning under sequential interaction.We make our dataset and evaluation suite publicly available at https://github.com/yashkumaratri/ChronoScope.
论文检索
输入标题、作者或关键词，从 100,903 篇学术成果中精准定位
CxMP: A Linguistic Minimal-Pair Benchmark for Evaluating Constructional Understanding in Language Models
PDF ↗Understanding language acquisition in language models remains an open question, yet many benchmarks focus on grammatical acceptability, with far less attention to interpreting meanings conveyed by grammatical forms.We introduce the Linguistic Minimal-Pair Benchmark for Evaluating Constructional Understanding in Language Models (CxMP), grounded in Construction Grammar, which treats form–meaning pairings (constructions) as fundamental linguistic units.It evaluates whether models interpret the semantic information implied by constructions, using a controlled minimal-pairs across nine types.Our results show that constructional understanding develops more gradually and remains limited for some constructions even in large language models (LLMs), whereas performance on grammatical acceptability emerges earlier, with shallow heuristics in CxMP exhibiting a U-shaped pattern.These findings highlight the need to broaden existing linguistic evaluations to capture meanings encoded in linguistic form.
Diffusion Large Language Models (dLLMs) have emerged as a promising non-autoregressive paradigm for text generation, offering parallel decoding and bidirectional context modeling. However, aligning dLLMs with reinforcement learning (RL) remains a significant challenge, as the marginal likelihood of sequences in masked diffusion is typically intractable, rendering standard policy gradient methods unstable or computationally prohibitive. In this work, we propose **Diffusion-Gibbs Alignment (DGA)**, a novel variational framework that reformulates RL for dLLMs as a distribution matching problem. DGA bypasses the explicit computation of log-probabilities by leveraging a learned energy function to model the relative quality of samples. The optimization is decoupled into two stable steps: (1) contrastive energy ranking to capture global reward structures, and (2) weighted diffusion alignment to update the policy via importance sampling. Empirically, DGA establishes a new state-of-the-art across logical reasoning (Sudoku, Countdown), mathematical reasoning (GSM8K, Math500), and code generation (HumanEval, MBPP) benchmarks. DGA offers a novel variational perspective for dLLM alignment, achieving better performance while simultaneously enhancing training speed and memory efficiency.
When users submit queries to Large Language Models (LLMs), their prompts can often contain sensitive data, forcing a difficult choice: Send the query to a powerful proprietary LLM providers to achieving state-of-the-art performance and risk data exposure, or relying on smaller, local models guarantees data privacy but often results in a degradation of task performance. Prior approaches have relied on static pipelines that use LLM rewriting, which shatters linguistic coherence and indiscriminately removes privacy-sensitive information, including task-critical content. We reformulate this challenge (Privacy-Conscious Delegation) as a sequential decision-making problem and introduce a novel reinforcement learning (RL) framework called Privacy-R1 to solve it. Our framework trains an agent to dynamically route text chunks, learning a policy that optimally balances the trade-off between privacy leakage and task performance. It implicitly distinguishes between replaceable Personally Identifiable Information (PII) (which it shields locally) and task-critical PII (which it strategically sends to the remote model for maximal utility). To validate our approach in complex scenarios, we also introduce a new medical dataset with high PII density. Our framework achieves a new state-of-the-art on the privacy-utility frontier, demonstrating the necessity of learned, adaptive policies for deploying LLMs in sensitive environments. Dataset can be found at: https://github.com/zackhuiiiii/Privacy-R1.
Multi-page Document Visual Question Answering requires reasoning over semantics, layouts, and visual elements in long, visually dense documents. Existing OCR-free methods face a trade-off between capacity and precision: end-to-end models scale poorly with document length, while visual retrieval-based pipelines are brittle and passive. We propose Doc-V^*, an OCR-free agentic framework that casts multi-page DocVQA as sequential evidence aggregation. Doc-V^* begins with a thumbnail overview, then actively navigates via semantic retrieval and targeted page fetching, and aggregates evidence in a structured working memory for grounded reasoning. Trained by imitation learning from expert trajectories and further optimized with Group Relative Policy Optimization, Doc-V^* balances answer accuracy with evidence-seeking efficiency. Across five benchmarks, Doc-V^* outperforms open-source baselines and approaches proprietary models, improving out-of-domain performance by up to 47.9% over RAG baseline. Other results reveal effective evidence aggregation with selective attention, not increased input pages.
When High Accuracy Hides Poor Calibration: Rethinking Confidence Evaluation in Transformer-Based Text Classification with Balanced Brier Score
PDF ↗Transformer-based Small (SLMs) and Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve strong effectiveness in text classification (TC), yet deployment requires reliable confidence estimates. Although miscalibration in Transformers has been reported, evidence for TC under fine-tuning remains limited. We evaluate the calibration of fine-tuned SLMs and LLMs against Logistic Regression, a classical, well-calibrated baseline, and find that, despite superior effectiveness, Transformers remain markedly overconfident. Crucially, we show that widely used calibration metrics, such as Expected Calibration Error and Brier Score, become biased in high-effectiveness regimes, where the dominance of correct predictions masks severe miscalibration on errors, sometimes even suggesting better calibration than Logistic Regression, a well-known calibrated method. To address this limitation, we propose the Balanced Brier Score (BBS), which balances the contribution of correct and incorrect predictions within confidence bins. BBS reveals substantially poorer calibration in both SLMs and LLMs, consistent with qualitative evidence from calibration curves. These findings challenge current calibration assessment practices and provide a more reliable alternative for evaluating confidence quality in Transformer-based TC.
Dense retrieval has become a core technique in applications like web search and retrieval-augmented generation. Despite their empirical success, it remains unclear whether these models truly understand semantics. To address this gap, this paper conducts a systematic investigation by introducing SURE, a benchmark for Semantic Understanding in dense REtrieval built upon the MSMARCO, NQ, and FiQA datasets. SURE characterizes semantic understanding in dense retrieval along three dimensions: semantic precision, semantic abstraction, and semantic equivalence. We evaluate ten representative models ranging from 110M to 8B parameters, including both general-purpose and domain-specific models. Results show that current dense retrievers struggle to distinguish fine-grained semantic differences across texts with varying information density, and to recognize semantic consistency under lexical paraphrasing. Moreover, larger models do not necessarily exhibit stronger semantic understanding, and diverse training data generally enhances semantic understanding on challenging retrieval tasks.
Coreference resolution is typically evaluated using aggregate statistical metrics such as CoNLL-F1, which measure structural overlap between predicted and gold clusters. While widely used, these metrics offer limited diagnostic insights, penalizing errors without revealing whether a system struggles with specific semantic categories, such as people, locations, or events, and making it difficult to interpret model capabilities or derive actionable improvements. We address this gap by introducing a semantically-enhanced evaluation framework for coreference resolution. Our approach overlays Concept and Named Entity Recognition (CNER) onto coreference outputs, assigning semantic labels to nominal mentions and propagating them to entire coreference clusters. This enables the computation of typed scores aimed at evaluating mention extraction and linking capabilities stratified by semantic class. Across our experiments on OntoNotes, LitBank, and PreCo, we show that our framework uncovers systematic weaknesses that remain obscured by aggregate metrics. Furthermore, we show that these diagnostics can be used to design targeted, low-cost data augmentation strategies, achieving measurable out-of-domain improvements.
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as long-term interactive agents, yet their limited context windows make it difficult to sustain coherent behavior over extended interactions. Existing memory systems for LLMs often store isolated records and retrieve fragments, limiting their ability to consolidate evolving experience and resolve conflicts. We introduce EverMemOS, a self-organizing memory operating system that implements an engram-inspired lifecycle for computational memory. First, Episodic Trace Formation converts dialogue streams into MemCells that capture episodic traces, atomic facts, and time-bounded foresight. Second, Semantic Consolidation organizes MemCells into thematic MemScenes, distilling stable semantic structures and updating user profiles. Finally, Reconstructive Recollection performs MemScene-guided agentic retrieval to compose the necessary and sufficient context for downstream reasoning. Experiments on LoCoMo, LongMemEval, and PersonaMem-v2 show that EverMemOS significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods on memory-augmented reasoning tasks.
Mind’s Eye: A Benchmark of Visual Abstraction, Transformation and Composition for Multimodal LLMs
PDF ↗Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved impressive progress on vision language benchmarks, yet their capacity for cognitive and psychological reasoning remains largely unexplored. We introduce Mind’s Eye, a multiple-choice benchmark of eight visuo-cognitive tasks inspired by classic human intelligence tests and organized under a novel A–R–T taxonomy: Abstraction, Relation, and Transformation. The tasks probe core processes of fluid intelligence such as pattern induction, analogical Relation mapping, and mental Transformation. We evaluate a diverse suite of closed-source and open-source MLLMs and compare their performance with human participants. Humans achieve 80% accuracy, while top performing MLLMs remain below 50%. Error analysis reveals failures in (i) visual attention allocation, (ii) internal perceptual manipulation, (iii) over reliance on domain priors, and (iv) weak abstraction of underlying visual concepts. Our findings suggest that current MLLMs exhibit limited fluid reasoning and visuo-cognitive integration compared with human participants, highlighting the need for cognitively grounded evaluation frameworks like Mind’s Eye.
This survey reviews LLM-based multi-agent systems for clinical and healthcare workflows, including diagnosis, triage, consultation, discharge, mental health, and EHR-linked decision support. We define AI hospitals as workflow-level clinical systems in which agents take explicit roles, hand off shared state, use EHR- or guideline-grounded tools, and operate with safety gates and audit-ready logs. We argue that these systems should be compared at the workflow level, rather than only by model components or end-task accuracy, because clinical action, evidence, and accountability are expressed through state transitions and handoffs. We organize the literature through a workflow-level taxonomy covering roles and handoffs, memory and evidence, tools, and reasoning, control, and escalation. We further synthesize major workflow settings and task families, introduce a four-layer evaluation stack spanning safety, process, outcome, and operations, and connect model capabilities to workflow observables relevant to deployment. Finally, we present Integration Readiness Levels (IRL1-IRL6), task-level instrumentation requirements, and recurring workflow failure modes as a practical framework for comparing, evaluating, and deploying clinical LLM agents and AI hospitals.
Thinking-Based Non-Thinking: Solving the Reward Hacking Problem in Training Hybrid Reasoning Models via Reinforcement Learning
PDF ↗Large reasoning models (LRMs) have attracted much attention due to their exceptional performance. However, their performance mainly stems from thinking, a long Chain of Thought (CoT), which significantly increase computational overhead. To address this overthinking problem, existing work focuses on using reinforcement learning (RL) to train hybrid reasoning models that automatically decide whether to engage in thinking or not based on the complexity of the query. Unfortunately, using RL will suffer the the reward hacking problem, e.g., the model engages in thinking but is judged as not doing so, resulting in incorrect rewards.To mitigate this problem, existing works either employ supervised fine-tuning (SFT), which incurs high computational costs, or enforce uniform token limits on non-thinking responses, which yields limited mitigation of the problem.In this paper, we propose Thinking-Based Non-Thinking (TNT). It does not employ SFT, and sets different maximum token usage for responses not using thinking across various queries by leveraging information from the solution component of the responses using thinking. Experiments on five mathematical benchmarks demonstrate that TNT reduces token usage by around 50\\%$ compared to DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B/7B and DeepScaleR-1.5B, while significantly improving accuracy. In fact, TNT achieves the optimal trade-off between accuracy and efficiency among all tested methods. Additionally, the probability of reward hacking problem in TNT’s responses, which are classified as not using thinking, remains below $10\\%$ across all tested datasets.
Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently advanced the field of Automated Theorem Proving (ATP), attaining substantial performance gains through widely adopted test-time scaling strategies, notably reflective Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning and increased sampling passes. However, they both introduce significant computational overhead for inference. Moreover, existing cost analyses typically regulate only the number of sampling passes, while neglecting the substantial disparities in sampling costs introduced by different scaling strategies. In this paper, we systematically compare the efficiency of different test-time scaling strategies for ATP models and demonstrate the inefficiency of the current state-of-the-art (SOTA) open-source approaches. We then investigate approaches to significantly reduce token usage and sample passes while maintaining the original performance. Specifically, we propose two complementary methods that can be integrated into a unified EconRL pipeline for amplified benefits: (1) a dynamic Chain-of-Thought (CoT) switching mechanism designed to mitigate unnecessary token consumption, and (2) Diverse parallel-scaled reinforcement learning (RL) with trainable prefixes to enhance pass rates under constrained sampling passes. Experiments on miniF2F and ProofNet demonstrate that our EconProver-GD achieves comparable performance to baseline methods with only 12% of the computational cost. This work provides actionable insights for deploying lightweight ATP models without sacrificing performance.
Multi-Task Representation Alignment on Language Understanding: A Mutual Information Perspective
PDF ↗Multi-task learning (MTL) enables joint learning over multiple tasks based on shared representations, but suffers from task interference issue during optimization. Existing works mainly focus on task balancing or probabilistic modeling but fail to address the issue since they struggle to learn sufficient representations for all target tasks. To address this, we propose a multi-task representation alignment (MTRA) framework to achieve task-specific alignment and self-alignment on the shared representations from a mutual information perspective. MTRA ensures that the learned representations contain task-relevant features while mitigating the negative effects of task-irrelevant features. First, we design a task-specific alignment objective to align the shared representations and task-specific representations with the expected targets of all tasks via information maximization. Besides, we design a self-alignment objective to eliminate task-irrelevant features via conditional information minimization. Experiments on two multi-task language benchmarks show that MTRA outperforms 13 representative MTL methods under the same settings, particularly under label-noisy and data-constrained conditions. Further analysis shows that the learned shared representations exhibit sufficient task informativeness and superior alignment properties.
Learning Invariant Modality Representation for Robust Multimodal Learning from a Causal Inference Perspective
PDF ↗Multimodal affective computing aims to predict humans’ sentiment, emotion, intention, and opinion using language, acoustic, and visual modalities. However, current models often learn spurious correlations that harm generalization under distribution shifts or noisy modalities. To address this, we propose a causal modality-invariant representation (CmIR) learning framework for robust multimodal learning. At its core, we introduce a theoretically grounded disentanglement method that separates each modality into ‘causal invariant representation’ and ‘environment-specific spurious representation’ from a causal inference perspective. CmIR ensures that the learned invariant representations retain stable predictive relationships with labels across different environments while preserving sufficient information from the raw inputs via invariance constraint, mutual information constraint, and reconstruction constraint. Experiments across multiple multimodal benchmarks demonstrate that CmIR achieves state-of-the-art performance. CmIR particularly excels on out-of-distribution data and noisy data, confirming its robustness and generalizability.
We introduce NSF-SciFy, a comprehensive dataset of scientific claims and investigation proposals extracted from National Science Foundation award abstracts. While previous scientific claim verification datasets have been limited in size and scope, NSF-SciFy represents a significant advance with 2.8 million claims from 400,000 abstracts spanning all science and mathematics disciplines. We present two focused subsets: NSF-SciFy-MatSci with 114,000 claims from materials science awards, and NSF-SciFy-20K with 135,000 claims across five NSF directorates. Using zero-shot prompting, we develop a scalable approach for joint extraction of scientific claims and investigation proposals. We demonstrate the dataset’s utility through three downstream tasks: non-technical abstract generation, claim extraction, and investigation proposal extraction. Fine-tuning language models on our dataset yields substantial improvements, with relative gains often exceeding 100%, particularly for claim and proposal extraction tasks. Our error analysis reveals that extracted claims exhibit high precision but lower recall, suggesting opportunities for further methodological refinement. NSF-SciFy enables new research directions in large-scale claim verification, scientific discovery tracking, and meta-scientific analysis.
SciCustom: A Framework for Custom Evaluation of Scientific Capabilities in Large Language Models
PDF ↗Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to scientific research, yet existing evaluations often fail to reflect the fine-grained capabilities required in practice. Most benchmarks are manually curated or domain-generic, limiting scalability and alignment with real scientific use cases. In this paper, we propose a new framework named SciCustom to address the problem. It enables the custom construction of benchmarks from large-scale scientific data to evaluate application-specific scientific capabilities in LLMs. SciCustom first organizes scientific knowledge into ontology-grounded knowledge units with controlled granularity and trains a tagger to map large-scale data instances into this knowledge space. Given a custom requirement, relevant knowledge units are identified via voting-based multi-model consensus. These units enable relevance-aware benchmark retrieval via binary search, followed by proxy subset selection and data-grounded benchmark generation for efficient evaluation. Experiments in chemistry and healthcare demonstrate that SciCustom reveals fine-grained differences in LLM scientific capabilities that standard benchmarks overlook, while requiring neither expert annotation nor synthetic question generation. This work provides a scalable and application-aware foundation for benchmarking scientific capabilities in LLMs.
Sign language translation (SLT) converts continuous sign videos into spoken-language text, yet it remains challenging due to the intrinsic modality mismatch between visual signs and written text, particularly in gloss-free settings. Recent SLT systems increasingly adopt CLIP-like Vision-Language pretraining (VLP) for cross-modal alignment, but the random in-batch contrast provides few, batch-dependent negatives and may mislabel semantically similar (or even identical) pairs as negatives, introducing noisy and potentially inconsistent alignment supervision.In this work, we first conduct a preliminary trajectory-based analysis that tracks negative video-text similarity over training. The results show that only a small subset of negatives exhibits the desired behavior of being consistently pushed away, while the remaining negatives display heterogeneous and often non-decreasing similarity dynamics, suggesting that random in-batch negatives are frequently uninformative for effective alignment.Inspired by this, we propose Selective Contrastive Learning for SLT (SCL-SLT) with a Pair Selection (PS) strategy. PS scores candidate negatives using similarity dynamics from reference checkpoints and constructs mini-batches via a curriculum that progressively emphasizes more challenging negatives, thereby strengthening contrastive supervision while reducing the influence of noisy or semantically invalid negatives.
As large language models (LLMs) continue to advance rapidly, reliable governance tools have become critical. Publicly verifiable watermarking is particularly essential for fostering a trustworthy AI ecosystem. A central challenge persists: balancing text quality against detection robustness. Recent studies have sought to navigate this trade-off by leveraging signals from model output distributions (e.g., token-level entropy); however, their reliance on these model-specific signals presents a significant barrier to public verification, as the detection process requires access to the logits of the underlying model. We introduce STELA, a novel framework that aligns watermark strength with the linguistic degrees of freedom inherent in language. STELA dynamically modulates the signal using part-of-speech (POS) n-gram–modeled linguistic indeterminacy, weakening it in grammatically constrained contexts to preserve quality and strengthening it in contexts with greater linguistic flexibility to enhance detectability. Our detector operates without access to any model logits, thus facilitating publicly verifiable detection. Through extensive experiments on typologically diverse languages—analytic English, isolating Chinese, and agglutinative Korean—we show that STELA surpasses prior methods in detection robustness. Our code is available at https://github.com/Shinwoo-Park/stela_watermark.
We introduce SkMTEB, the first comprehensive MTEB-style text embedding benchmark for Slovak, a low-resource West Slavic language, comprising 31 datasets across 7 task types—nearly 4\times the depth of existing multilingual benchmark coverage for Slovak. Our evaluation of 31 embedding models reveals that large instruction-tuned multilingual models achieve the strongest performance, while existing Slovak-specific models trained for NLU tasks transfer poorly to embedding tasks. To address the need for efficient, locally-deployable Slovak embeddings, we develop e5-sk-small (45M parameters) and e5-sk-large (365M) by applying vocabulary trimming and fine-tuning to Multilingual E5 models. Despite size reductions of up to 62%, our open-source models achieve competitive performance with proprietary APIs while remaining locally deployable for semantic search and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). We release the benchmark, models, datasets, and code openly, hoping our approach offers a replicable path for other under-resourced languages.