Relation extraction (RE) identifies semantic relations between entities in text, with existing methods falling into two main paradigms: discriminative and generative. Discriminative models encode sentences and entities into relation representations and classify the most likely relation, whereas generative models directly produce relation labels through sequence generation. Although the latter have benefited from recent advances in large language models (LLMs), their performance remains limited by bottlenecks. In this work, we present the systematic investigation of how discriminative models can support generative RE. We propose the Discriminative-to-Generative (D2G) framework, which first leverages discriminative models to produce a top-k set of candidate relations, and then integrates this knowledge into generative models via in-context or prompt learning. Extensive experiments on five widely used RE benchmarks demonstrate that D2G consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance, with notable gains on long-tailed relation classes.
论文检索
输入标题、作者或关键词，从 100,903 篇学术成果中精准定位
Layer-Wise High-Impact Parameter Ratio Optimization in Post-Training Quantization for Large Language Models
PDF ↗Large language models (LLMs) have advanced natural language processing, but their massive parameter counts create computational and memory challenges during deployment. Post-training quantization (PTQ) has emerged as a promising approach to mitigate these challenges. While existing PTQ methods can effectively quantize LLMs, they experience substantial accuracy loss at extremely low bit-widths due to high-impact parameters. Several approaches address this by retaining high-impact parameters in FP16 format, but they apply fixed ratios across all layers, overlooking layer-wise sensitivity variations. We propose a quadratic optimization framework that determines layer-specific ratios of high-impact parameters while considering inter-layer dependencies. We quantize high-impact parameters to moderate bit-widths while the remaining parameters are quantized to extremely low bit-widths. Under the same resource budget, this preserves more high-impact parameters than methods retaining a few in FP16 format. Our framework enables leveraging advanced quantization methods for high-impact parameters while applying lightweight computational quantization methods to the rest, achieving an effective balance between computational efficiency and accuracy during quantization process.
As Large Language Models (LLMs) have reached human-like fluency and coherence, distinguishing machine-generated text (MGT) from human-written content becomes increasingly difficult. While early efforts in MGT detection have focused on binary classification, the growing landscape and diversity of LLMs require a more fine-grained yet challenging authorship attribution (AA), i.e., being able to identify the precise generator (LLM or human) behind a text. However, AA remains nowadays confined to a monolingual setting, with English being the most investigated one, overlooking the multilingual nature and usage of modern LLMs. In this work, we introduce the problem of Multilingual Authorship Attribution, which involves attributing texts to human or multiple LLM generators across diverse languages. Focusing on 18 languages—covering multiple families and writing scripts—and 8 generators (7 LLMs and the human-authored class), we investigate the multilingual suitability of monolingual AA methods in terms of their cross-lingual transferability, and the impact of generators on attribution performance. Our results reveal that while certain monolingual AA methods can be adapted to multilingual settings, significant limitations and challenges remain, particularly in transferring across diverse language families, underscoring the complexity of multilingual AA and the need for more robust approaches to better match real-world scenarios.
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have made substantial advances in reasoning tasks at the Olympiad level. Nevertheless, current Olympiad-level multimodal reasoning benchmarks for these models often emphasize single-image analysis and fail to exploit contextual information across multiple images. We present OMIBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate Olympiad-level reasoning when the required evidence is distributed over multiple images. It contains problems from biology, chemistry, mathematics, and physics Olympiads, together with manually annotated rationales and evaluation protocols for both exact and semantic answer matching. Across extensive experiments on OMIBench, we observe meaningful performance gaps in existing models. Even the strongest LVLMs, such as Gemini-3-Pro, attain only about 50% on the benchmark. These results position OMIBench as a focused resources for studying and improving multi-image reasoning in LVLMs.
Fine-grained emotion classification (FEC) requires distinguishing subtly different emotions, where the dominant errors come from closely confusable categories. Recent progress relies on contrastive learning with hard-pair mining, implicitly assuming that a fixed similarity metric is sufficient to optimize informative pairs. We argue that this assumption is fragile because defining whether two utterances are similar becomes a problem when the label space is crowded, and hard-pair mining under a fixed metric can systematically miss the worst confusions. Thus, we treat the similarity function as a learnable component and design an adversarial metric learning (AML) framework. It follows theoretical interpretations of metric-robust representations that better separate confusable emotions. AML trains a pairwise discriminator to maximally confuse two targeted hard pair types, while training the encoder to remain discriminative under this worst-case learned metric. Our code and data are released on GitHub.
Learning Faster with Better Tokens: Parameter-Efficient Vocabulary Adaptation for Specialized Text Summarization
PDF ↗Large language models pretrained on general-domain corpora often exhibit tokenization inefficiencies when applied to specialized domains. Although continual pretraining for domain adaptation partially alleviate performance degradation, it does not resolve the fundamental vocabulary mismatch. To address this gap, we introduce a targeted parameter-efficient domain adaptation approach that combines vocabulary adaptation with pretraining for LLM-based text summarization. Our unified framework augments pretrained tokenizers with domain-specific tokens while selectively replacing under-trained and unreachable tokens to limit parameter growth. We evaluate our approach on Llama-3.1-8B and Qwen2.5-7B across legal and medical summarization tasks on a challenge-oriented evaluation protocol focused on expert-driven text and summaries which typically has higher concentration of over-fragmented Out-of-Vocabulary (**OOV**) words. The vocabulary adaptation algorithm enhances the overall quality of the summarization model by improving semantic similarity between the generated summaries and their references. In addition, the adapted model produces summaries that incorporate more appropriate novel and domain-specific words, leading to improved coherence, relevance, and faithfulness. We further observe that our proposed approach significantly reduce training time by 35-55% over continual pretraining and reduce parameter counts up to 37% w.r.t expansion-only methods. We make codebase publicly available at [url](https://github.com/gb-kgp/VocabReplace-Then-Expand).
Revealing the Seen, Imagining the Beyond: A Survey of Image-Grounded Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Multimodal LLMs
PDF ↗Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are making rapid strides in complex visual reasoning. This survey synthesizes the emerging paradigm of Image-Grounded Chain-of-Thought (IG-CoT), where models ground intermediate inferences by interleaving textual rationales with visual state updates. We formalize IG-CoT, present a method-centric taxonomy covering prompting, supervised fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning, and map these techniques to representative benchmarks. Our analysis identifies two domains where IG-CoT offers significant advantages: detail-oriented reasoning requiring meticulous perception, and imagined-world reasoning for simulating unseen states in games, geometry, and planning. We discuss the practical trade-offs of current methods regarding controllability, data, and compute. We conclude by highlighting key challenges (efficiency, data quality, and generative capabilities) and outlining promising future directions, including lightweight architectures, richer intermediate supervision, and method-aware evaluations that better assess faithfulness and long-horizon reasoning. We maintain a continuously updated paper list at https://github.com/dddraxxx/Awesome-Image-Grounded-CoT.
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated increasingly strong reasoning capabilities, achieving remarkable progress in knowledge graph question answering (KGQA). However, a key challenge in such systems is non-deterministic reasoning, where the model indecisively activates multiple semantically related knowledge graph edges for a given query, frequently leading to incorrect answers. To address this issue, we propose Diagnosing and Remedying Representation Deficiencies for Deterministic Reasoning in KGQA (DR2). DR2 identifies and localizes non-deterministic reasoning behaviors, uncovering the underlying semantic representation deficiencies in LLMs. Building on this diagnosis, we design abductive reasoning-based preference learning, which promotes fine-grained semantic discrimination and mitigates non-deterministic reasoning errors. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed DR2 significantly outperforms several strong baselines, achieving state-of-the-art performance on the widely used WebQSP and CWQ benchmarks.
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) embedded in agentic frameworks have transformed information retrieval from static, long-context question answering into open-ended exploration. Yet real-world use requires models to discover and synthesize “long-tail” facts from dispersed sources, a capability that remains under-evaluated. We introduce PolitNuggets, a multilingual benchmark for agentic information synthesis via constructing political biographies for 400 global elites, covering over 10000 political facts. We standardize evaluation with an optimized Supervisor–Searcher multi-agent system and propose FactNet, an evidence-conditional protocol that scores discovery, fine-grained accuracy, and efficiency. Across models and settings, we find that current systems often struggle with fine-grained details, and vary substantially in efficiency. Finally, using benchmark diagnostics, we relate agent performance to underlying model capabilities, highlighting the importance of short-context extraction, multilingual robustness, and reliable tool use.
Learning How and What to Memorize: Cognition-Inspired Two-Stage Optimization for Evolving Memory
PDF ↗Large language model (LLM) agents require long-term user memory for consistent personalization, but limited context windows hinder tracking evolving preferences over long interactions. Existing memory systems mainly rely on static, hand-crafted update rules; although reinforcement learning (RL)-based agents learn memory updates, sparse outcome rewards provide weak supervision, resulting in unstable long-horizon optimization. Drawing on memory schema theory and the functional division between prefrontal regions and hippocampus regions, we introduce MemCoE, a cognition-inspired two-stage optimization framework that learns how memory should be organized and what information to update. In the first stage, we propose Memory Guideline Induction to optimize a global guideline via contrastive feedback interpreted as textual gradients; in the second stage, Guideline-Aligned Memory Policy Optimization uses the induced guideline to define structured process rewards and performs multi-turn RL to learn a guideline-following memory evolution policy. We evaluate on three personalization memory benchmarks, covering explicit and implicit preferences as well as different sizes and noise levels, and observe consistent improvements over strong baselines with favorable robustness, transferability, and efficiency[https://github.com/Applied-Machine-Learning-Lab/ACL2026_MemCoE].
Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have improved performance in multi-modal learning, raising the question of whether these models truly understand the content they process. Crucially, can VLMs detect when a reasoning process is wrong and identify its error type? To answer this, we present MMErroR, a multi-modal benchmark of 1997 samples, each embedding a single coherent reasoning error. These samples span 24 subdomains across six top-level domains, ensuring broad coverage and taxonomic richness. Unlike existing benchmarks that focus on answer correctness, MMErroR targets a process-level, error-centric evaluation that requires models to detect incorrect reasoning and classify the error type within both visual and linguistic contexts. We evaluate 12 representative VLMs, and even the best model, Gemini-3-Pro-Preview, classifies the error correctly in only 66.65% of cases, underscoring the challenge of identifying erroneous reasoning. Furthermore, the ability to accurately identify errors offers valuable insights into the capabilities of multi-modal models.Project Page: https://mmerror-benchmark.github.io
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted as scalable judges for open-ended generation, yet how they form judgments remains insufficiently understood. Meanwhile, modern LLMs frequently produce answers accompanied by explicit reasoning, making reasoning chains a natural but understudied source of information for model-based evaluation. This work takes a first step toward understanding how exposing reasoning influences LLM-based judgment. Empirical results across factual question-answering (QA) and mathematical datasets show that the presence of reasoning substantially alters judgment behavior, with clear differences across judge capabilities. Weaker judges become more likely to accept incorrect answers when reasoning is present, suggesting over-reliance on persuasive explanations. In contrast, stronger judges exhibit more selective behavior and, in some cases, achieve higher judgment accuracy by leveraging reasoning content. Further analysis reveals that both reasoning fluency and factuality critically shape judgment outcomes. Together, these findings suggest that examining how models interpret reasoning is essential for understanding and improving LLM-based evaluation, with broader implications for the design of reliable automatic judges and evaluation protocols.
Pretrained large language models (LLMs) are typically reused as indivisible artifacts, adapted, merged, or ensembled as a whole. In this study, we show that LLMs can instead be structurally recomposed as modular building blocks to create new architectures without access to original training data. We introduce architecture-level reassembly as a new reuse paradigm, in which Transformer blocks from heterogeneous models are treated as reusable components. This idea is formalized through a two-dimensional reassembly space that supports both vertical recombination across depth and horizontal composition within layers. To make this space tractable, we propose a chromosome-based architectural encoding and perform a bi-level multi-objective evolutionary optimization over vertical structure and horizontal composition. To resolve representation incompatibility across heterogeneous blocks, we introduce lightweight glue layers trained via data-free knowledge distillation, enabling valid information flow without modifying pretrained parameters. Our results demonstrate that architecture-level reassembly unlocks a new dimension of flexibility in model reuse, pointing toward a modular and evolutionary view of LLM design.
Code-switching (CSW) is the act of alternating between two or more languages within a single discourse. This phenomenon is widespread in multilingual communities and increasingly prevalent online, exposing large language models (LLMs) to mixed-language inputs. We present a systematic evaluation of LLM *comprehension* under code-switching by generating linguistically grounded CSW variants of established benchmarks (Belebele, MMLU, XNLI) across five typologically diverse languages. Our contributions are: (i) a controlled pipeline for producing CSW test sets that respect linguistic constraints on code-switching; (ii) a multi-model, multi-language analysis showing that inserting non-English tokens into English consistently reduces accuracy on comprehension and reasoning benchmarks, whereas embedding English into non-English contexts often improves it; and (iii) a mitigation study contrasting in-context learning (ICL) with fine-tuning. Across model families, ICL cues yield inconsistent, and sometimes negative, effects, while fine-tuning on CSW data provides modest but reliable gains, partially recovering accuracy under CSW.
One Persona, Many Cues, Different Results: How Sociodemographic Cues Impact LLM Personalization
PDF ↗Personalization of LLMs by sociodemographic subgroup often improves user experience, but can also introduce or amplify biases and unfairoutcomes across groups. Prior work has employed so-called personas, sociodemographic user attributes conveyed to a model, to studybias in LLMs by relying on a single cue to prompt a persona, such as user names or explicit attribute mentions. This disregards LLM sensitivity to prompt variation and the rarity of some cues in real interactions (external validity). We compare six commonly used personacues across seven open and proprietary LLMs on four writing and advice tasks. While cues are overall highly correlated, they produce sub-stantial variance in responses across personas that can change findings on persona-induced differences and bias. We therefore cautionagainst claims based on single persona cues, especially when they are overly explicit and have low external validity.
While language models demonstrate sophisticated syntactic capabilities, the extent to which their internal mechanisms align with cross-constructional principles studied in linguistics remains poorly understood. This study investigates whether models employ shared neural mechanisms across different syntactic constructions by applying causal interpretability methods at a granular level. Focusing on filler-gap dependencies and negative polarity item (NPI) licensing, we utilize activation patching to identify the functional roles of specific attention heads and MLP blocks. Our results reveal a highly localized and shared mechanism for filler-gap dependencies located in the early to middle layers, whereas NPI processing exhibits no such unified mechanism. Furthermore, we find that these mechanisms identified by activation patching generalize to out-of-distribution, while distributed alignment search, a supervised interpretability method, is susceptible to overfitting on narrow linguistic distributions. Finally, we validate our findings by demonstrating that the manipulation of the identified components improves model performance on acceptability judgment benchmarks.
Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR) has emerged as a promising direction by extending Large Language Models’ (LLMs) capabilities with external tools during reasoning. Existing TIR methods typically rely on external tool documentation during reasoning. However, this leads to tool mastery difficulty, tool size constraints, and inference inefficiency. To mitigate these issues, we explore Tool-Internalized Reasoning (TInR), aiming at facilitating reasoning with tool knowledge internalized into LLMs. Achieving this goal presents notable requirements, including tool internalization and tool-reasoning coordination. To address them, we propose TInR-U, a tool-internalized reasoning framework for unified reasoning and tool usage. TInR-U is trained through a three-phase pipeline: 1) tool internalization with a bidirectional knowledge alignment strategy; 2) supervised fine-tuning warm-up using high-quality reasoning annotations, and 3) reinforcement learning with TInR-specific rewards. We comprehensively evaluate our method across in-domain and out-of-domain settings. Experiment results show that TInR-U achieves superior performance in both settings, highlighting its effectiveness and efficiency. The codes are attached in the supplementary file for review.
Existing text-guided image editing methods primarily rely on end-to-end pixel-level inpainting paradigm. Despite its success in simple scenarios, this paradigm still significantly struggles with compositional editing tasks that require precise local control and complex multi-object spatial reasoning. This paradigm is severely limited by 1) the implicit coupling of planning and execution, 2) the lack of object-level control granularity, and 3) the reliance on unstructured, pixel-centric modeling. To address these limitations, we propose I2E, a novel "Decompose-then-Action” paradigm that revisits image editing as an actionable interaction process within a structured environment. I2E utilizes a Decomposer to transform unstructured images into discrete, manipulable object layers and then introduces a physics-aware Vision-Language-Action Agent to parse complex instructions into a series of atomic actions via Chain-of-Thought reasoning. Further, we also construct I2E-Bench, a benchmark designed for multi-instance spatial reasoning and high-precision editing. Experimental results on I2E-Bench and multiple public benchmarks demonstrate that I2E significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods in handling complex compositional instructions, maintaining physical plausibility, and ensuring multi-turn editing stability.
While Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are designed to enhance factual fidelity by grounding LLMs in provided sources, the application of current watermarking techniques creates a paradoxical failure mode. These methods, being inherently fact-agnostic, force the model to deviate from the very source documents it is supposed to follow. This leads to “faithfulness hallucinations"—a critical flaw where the generated output contradicts its own grounding context. Consequently, these watermarks undermine the core value of RAG, rendering even the most secure schemes untrustworthy for high-stakes applications. To resolve this RAG-specific conflict, we introduce the Dual Factual Shield (DFS) framework, a novel architecture designed to enforce knowledge loyalty. The DFS framework employs a defense-in-depth strategy through two synergistic layers: a source-anchored algorithmic safeguard that shields critical terms from the retrieved context, and prompt-based semantic guidance that protects against factual corruption. To demonstrate its effectiveness, we enhance a state-of-the-art, spoofing-aware contrastive watermarking baseline with our framework. Experiments show that our framework drastically reduces the Knowledge Corruption Rate (KCR)—a new metric we introduce—while preserving its original high security and robustness. This work establishes a new paradigm for watermarking, evolving it from merely secure to truly trustworthy. We demonstrate that traceability and truth can, and must, coexist, paving the way for the responsible deployment of traceable AI in knowledge-critical domains.
Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) achieve strong multimodal reasoning but frequently exhibit hallucinations and incorrect responses with high certainty, which hinders their usage in high-stakes domains. Existing verbalized confidence calibration methods, largely developed for text-only LLMs, typically optimize a single holistic confidence score using binary answer-level correctness. This design is mismatched to LVLMs: an incorrect prediction may arise from perceptual failures or from reasoning errors given correct perception, and a single confidence conflates these sources while visual uncertainty is often dominated by language priors. To address these issues, we propose VL-Calibration, a reinforcement learning framework that explicitly decouples confidence into visual and reasoning confidence. To supervise visual confidence without ground-truth perception labels, we introduce an intrinsic visual certainty estimation that combines (i) visual grounding measured by KL-divergence under image perturbations and (ii) internal certainty measured by token entropy. We further propose token-level advantage reweighting to focus optimization on tokens based on visual certainty, suppressing ungrounded hallucinations while preserving valid perception. Experiments on thirteen benchmarks show that VL-Calibration effectively improves calibration while boosting visual reasoning accuracy, and it generalizes to out-of-distribution benchmarks across model scales and architectures.