We propose Lizard, a linearization framework that transforms pretrained Transformer-based Large Language Models (LLMs) into subquadratic architectures. Transformers faces severe computational and memory bottlenecks with long sequences due to the quadratic complexity of softmax attention and the growing Key-Value (KV) cache that makes inference memory-bound by context length. Lizard addresses these limitations by introducing a subquadratic attention mechanism that closely approximates softmax attention while preserving model quality. Unlike prior linearization methods constrained by fixed, non-adaptive structures, Lizard augments the architecture with compact, learnable modules that enable adaptive memory control and robust length generalization. Moreover, we introduce a hardware-aware algorithm that solves numerical instability in gated attention to accelerate training. Extensive experiments show that Lizard achieves near-lossless recovery of its teacher model’s performance, significantly outperforming previous methods by up to 9.4 - 24.5 points on the 5-shot MMLU benchmark and demonstrating superior associative recall.
论文检索
输入标题、作者或关键词，从 100,903 篇学术成果中精准定位
Large Language Models based Table Question Answering (LLMs-based TableQA) models excel in NLP field, however, they occasionally exhibit an unfaithful behavior where correct answers are derived through erroneous reasoning paths. In this condition, we propose TrustTable, a neuro-symbolic framework designed to ensure reasoning faithfulness by auditing the reasoning processes of LLMs. Unlike monolithic LLM-based auditors, TrustTable decouples the auditing operation into two orthogonal dimensions. It enforces factual grounding by executing neurally generated Pandas code against the table, and ensures logical soundness by verifying reasoning chains through a LLM-synthesized formal solver. By integrating these symbolic checks, TrustTable enables a Label-Free Audit Loop that systematically identifies and rectifies reasoning flaws without human supervision. In addition, we present the TrustTable-Bench, a diagnostic dataset containing diverse error categories that range from calculation discrepancies to schema misalignments. This benchmark allows for a rigorous quantification of reasoning limitations. Experiments demonstrate that our symbolic audit detects reasoning flaws more accurately than advanced baselines. More broadly, the TrustTable outperforms LLM judges in both majority voting with logical weighting and rejection sampling with process supervision.
From Regulatory Approvals to Patents: Cross-Domain Linking for Cardiovascular Device Traceability
PDF ↗Linking FDA-approved medical devices to their underlying United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) patents enables critical applications such as recall root-cause analysis, M&A-driven IP discovery, and technology trajectory mapping. However, this cross-domain entity linking task remains unexplored due to severe **semantic gaps**: FDA documents focus on clinical outcomes, while patents describe technical mechanisms, yielding minimal lexical overlap. We formalize medical device-patent linking as a challenging cross-domain entity linking problem characterized by label scarcity and domain shifts. Using cardiovascular devices as a high-impact, representative domain featuring diverse technologies, high recall rates, and abundant disclosures, we construct a benchmark with 434 devices, 698K patents, and 585 high-fidelity expert-verified pairs. To address these challenges, we propose Bridge-MedDevKG, a coarse-to-fine framework that integrates (1) **MedDevOnto**, a domain-specific ontology that anchors device concepts via three-tier UMLS normalization; (2) **Multi-signal candidate generation** fusing company affiliation, semantic similarity, and ontology-weighted entity overlap; and (3) **Heterogeneous reranking** with multi-signal scoring and XGBoost classification on hard negatives. Our approach achieves a conservative lower-bound recall of 91.6% on the gold standard with 50.9% noise reduction, substantially outperforming LLM baselines under comparable evaluation. The resulting MedDevKG provides 6.8M high-confidence links, laying a scalable foundation for regulatory-IP integration across medical specialties.
WSDPO: A Generative Word Sense Disambiguation Framework with Chain-of-Thought and Preference Optimization
PDF ↗Word sense disambiguation (WSD) is a foundational task in natural language processing. Recent research has reformulated WSD for large language models (LLMs) as a generative task, where the model produces a definition to convey the intended meaning of an ambiguous word in context.In practice, most existing approaches implement this formulation through straightforward supervised fine-tuning, which tends to prioritize superficial context-to-gloss memorization over true contextual sense discrimination, leading to degraded performance on less frequent senses (LFS), particularly in unseen settings.To address this issue, we propose WSDPO, a training framework for generative WSD with chain-of-thought (CoT) and preference optimization. WSDPO consists of three stages: (1) disambiguation-aware CoT construction, which produces training data containing explicit disambiguation steps for the later stage;(2) disambiguation-guided supervised fine-tuning, which explicitly trains the model to discriminate word sense before generating the final definition; and(3) preference-based optimization, which further strengthens the model’s ability to generate sense-faithful definitions by optimizing it using preference pairs constructed from multiple sampled CoT outputs.Extensive experiments across benchmark datasets and multiple backbone LLMs demonstrate that WSDPO achieves substantial performance gains on rare and unseen settings, and exhibits strong generalization in standard evaluation settings.
Scientific ideation aims to propose novel solutions within a given scientific context. Existing LLM-based agentic approaches emulate human research workflows, yet inadequately model scientific reasoning, resulting in surface-level conceptual recombinations that lack technical depth and scientific grounding. To address this issue, we propose \textbf{MoRI} (\textbf{Mo}tivation-grounded \textbf{R}easoning for Scientific \textbf{I}deation), a framework that enables LLMs to explicitly learn the reasoning process from research motivations to methodologies. The base LLM is initialized via supervised fine-tuning to generate a research motivation from a given context, and is subsequently trained under a composite reinforcement learning reward that approximates scientific rigor: (1) entropy-aware information gain encourages the model to uncover and elaborate high-complexity technical details grounded in ground-truth methodologies, and (2) contrastive semantic gain constrains the reasoning trajectory to remain conceptually aligned with scientifically valid solutions. Empirical results show that MoRI consistently outperforms strong commercial LLMs and complex agentic baselines across multiple dimensions, including novelty, technical rigor, and feasibility. The code is available on GitHub.
SOAPTriage: SOAP-Guided Multi-View Clinical Text Modeling Framework for Automated ESI Prediction
PDF ↗Emergency departments (ED) rely on the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) to assess patient acuity and prioritize care, a process that is largely driven by clinical triage text. Despite recent progress in automated ESI prediction, two fundamental challenges remain: the scarcity of high-quality triage text data due to privacy and regulatory constraints and the lack of a clinically grounded triage framework capable of explicitly capturing the multidimensional structure of triage reasoning. To address these challenges, we draw inspiration from the clinically grounded SOAP paradigm, in which SOAP refers to Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan and captures four complementary aspects of clinical reasoning. Building on this paradigm, we propose SOAPTriage, a SOAP-guided multi-view clinical text modeling framework for automated ESI prediction. To mitigate data scarcity, SOAPTriage introduces a Clinical Note Augmentation (CNA) module that generates natural-language triage notes from structured ED records, resulting in 15,393 augmented clinical notes derived from a real-world dataset. To incorporate clinical structure, SOAPTriage employs a SOAP-Guided Encoding (SGE) module that models patient conditions from four complementary SOAP perspectives, together with an adaptive SOAP-Aware Aggregation and Inference (SAAI) module that performs multi-view reasoning to infer ESI levels. Extensive experiments show that SOAPTriage consistently outperforms strong prompting-based, multi-agent, and encoder-based baselines, demonstrating the effectiveness of SOAP-guided multi-view clinical text modeling for automated emergency triage.
Memory systems for LLM agents struggle to determine what information deserves retention. Existing approaches rely on predefined heuristics such as importance scores, emotional tags, or factual templates, encoding designer intuition rather than learning from the data itself. Inspired by cognitive ideas, we propose Nemori, an adaptive memory distillation framework that casts the assessment of the experience’s future utility as a matter of predictability. Specifically, Nemori comprises two cascading modules: Episodic Memory Integration transforms raw interactions into coherent narratives, and Semantic Knowledge Distillation extracts insights via prediction error. Centering on distillation, the framework remains agnostic to downstream management. Extensive experiments confirm that Nemori achieves strong performance, efficiency, and storage reduction. Our work suggests that observing the intrinsic properties of interaction sequences offers a viable, data-driven alternative to heuristic-based memory design.
Writing is a cognitively demanding activity that requires constant decision-making, heavy reliance on working memory, and frequent shifts between tasks of different goals. To build writing assistants that truly align with writers’ cognition, it is necessary to capture and analyze the complete thought process behind how writers transform ideas into final texts. We present SCHOLAWRITE, the first dataset of end-to-end scholarly writing, tracing the multi-month journey from initial drafts to final manuscripts. The dataset traces nearly 62K LaTeX-based edits from five computer science preprints over four months and is enriched with fine-grained annotations of cognitive writing intentions. We demonstrate the value of ScholaWrite through three complementary contributions: (1) analysis of real-world writing behavior reveals that scholarly writing is highly non-linear and multi-intentional, blending rapid drafting bursts with cognitively sustained writing sessions; (2) evaluations of current large language models show that they struggle to provide meaningful support throughout the human writing process; and (3) models finetuned on SCHOLAWRITE demonstrate improved alignment with human writing workflows. SCHOLAWRITE underscores the value of capturing scientists’ cognitive writing process and provides actionable insights and resources for the development of future writing assistants.
Towards Intrinsic Interpretability of Large Language Models: A Survey of Design Principles and Architectures
PDF ↗While Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance across many NLP tasks, their opaque internal mechanisms hinder trustworthiness and safe deployment. Existing surveys in explainable AI largely focus on post-hoc explanation methods that interpret trained models through external approximations. In contrast, intrinsic interpretability, which builds transparency directly into model architectures and computations, has recently emerged as a promising alternative. This paper presents a systematic review of the recent advances in intrinsic interpretability for LLMs, categorizing existing approaches into five design paradigms: functional transparency, concept alignment, representational decomposability, explicit modularization, and latent sparsity induction. We further discuss open challenges and outline future research directions in this emerging field. The paper list is available at: Survey-Intrinsic-Interpretability-of-LLMs
L2Dir: Integrating L\_2-Norm and Directional Alignment for Unsupervised Contrastive Representation Learning in Multimodal Retrieval
PDF ↗Multimodal representation learning primarily relies on contrastive objectives such as InfoNCE to align diverse modalities. However, these methods focus almost exclusively on directional alignment and often neglect the intrinsic role of embedding magnitudes (L2-norm) in the contrastive process. To bridge this gap, we propose L2Dir, a plug-and-play framework designed to optimize L2-norm alignment and Directional consistency jointly. As a highly efficient solution, L2Dir doesn’t require extra data, distillation, or external supervision. It can be integrated seamlessly into existing pipelines by employing a lightweight MLP to reconstruct magnitudes from frozen backbone features. Extensive evaluations across 95 tasks using UniIR and VLM2Vec-V2 frameworks demonstrate that L2Dir yields consistent and significant performance gains over established baselines across various backbones and scales, proving that explicit magnitude modeling is a versatile and potent strategy for refining unsupervised multimodal representations. The source code for L2Dir in VLM2Vec-V2 is available in the supplementary materials.
Document-level relation extraction (DocRE) aims to determine which relations hold between a given entity pair within a document. As a multi-label classification task, the most commonly adopted paradigm introduces a learnable threshold to distinguish positive and negative classes for an entity pair. Under this paradigm, existing losses decouple the optimization into independent positive and negative losses, which interact solely with a shared threshold. This leads to two inherent limitations: (*i*) threshold instability caused by conflicting gradient updates from the decoupled losses; and (*ii*) optimization bias exacerbated by the severe imbalance between limited positive samples and abundant negative samples inherent in DocRE, which makes the model more likely to predict that no relation exists.To address these issues, we propose the **A**daptive-**T**hreshold **G**lobal **L**oss (ATGL). Unlike prior work, ATGL integrates positive, negative, and threshold optimization into a unified logit space and explicitly enforces ranking constraints on their contributions to the objective. Furthermore, ATGL incorporates an imbalance-aware optimization mechanism, thereby effectively addressing the severe class imbalance in DocRE. Our ATGL serves as a general optimization objective that can be readily applied to different DocRE models. Experiments on four datasets show that ATGL outperforms other DocRE losses and achieves state-of-the-art results, while consistently improving the performance of existing DocRE models. Code is available at https://github.com/xhm-code/ATGL.
New Terms, New Toxicity: Consensus-based Chinese Neologism Toxicity Detection via Search-Augmented LLMs
PDF ↗Neologisms, emerging terms in meaning or form, can serve as new vehicles for toxic expression, like "田园女" ("country girl") as a stigmatizing label targeting feminism. Such toxic neologisms appear benign but have evolved into toxic usage in public consensus, posing challenges to moderation systems and remaining underexplored. In this paper, we investigate how to detect implicit toxicity expressed via neologisms. We first propose a taxonomy that captures the origins and consensus-verification criteria of toxic neologisms, followed by the construction of a lexicon spanning widely observed risk categories. To capture toxicity grounded in public consensus, we introduce **SeTox**, a search-augmented framework that enables static large language models (LLMs) to incorporate real-time web context for neologism toxicity detection. Experiments show that **SeTox**, even with 3B-scale models, outperforms recent large-scale models, demonstrating its scalability to incorporate real-world knowledge for toxic neologism detection. **Disclaimer**: this paper has offensive contents that may be disturbing to some readers.
Knowledge Graph (KG) retrieval is a promising augmentation to address knowledge gaps and hallucinations in LLMs. As KGs in practice are stored in graph databases (e.g., Wikidata, Freebase), accurate retrieval requires translating natural language questions into structured queries (query generation). A key challenge of query generation is Text-to-Cypher, which generates Cypher queries for property graphs (e.g., Neo4j), a paradigm increasingly adopted in industry for their scalable architectures and expressive schemas. However, compared to other query generation tasks such as Text-to-SQL or Text-to-SPARQL, Text-to-Cypher remains underexplored due to scarce public KGs and datasets. Existing datasets are small, domain-limited, and lack diversity, constraining LLM progress. To address this, we introduce CypherSmith, an instruction-tuning dataset over 12\times larger than prior public Text-to-Cypher datasets, spanning diverse domains to better support LLM fine-tuning. Our key distinction lies in fully leveraging open-source LLMs for large-scale synthetic data generation and introducing a novel likelihood-based filtering technique to ensure high-quality Text-to-Cypher data. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of CypherSmith, achieving state-of-the-art LLM performance.
To sustain coherent long-term interactions, Large Language Model (LLM) agents must navigate the tension between acquiring new information and retaining prior knowledge. Current unified stream-based memory systems facilitate context updates but remain vulnerable to interference from transient noise. Conversely, discrete structured memory architectures provide robust knowledge retention but often struggle to adapt to fluid narrative evolution. To address this, we propose GAM, a hierarchical Graph-based Agentic Memory framework that explicitly decouples memory encoding from consolidation to effectively resolve the conflict between rapid context perception and stable knowledge retention. By isolating ongoing dialogue in a event progression graph and integrating it into a topic associative network only upon semantic shifts, our approach minimizes interference while preserving long-term consistency. Additionally, we introduce a Graph-guided, Multi-factor Retrieval strategy to enhance context precision. Experiments on LoCoMo and LongDialQA benchmarks indicate that our method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in both reasoning accuracy and computational efficiency.
Large language models (LLMs) often struggle to use tools reliably in domain-specific settings, where APIs may be idiosyncratic, under-documented, or tailored to private workflows. This highlights the need for effective adaptation to task-specific tools. We propose RIMRULE, a neuro-symbolic approach for LLM adaptation based on dynamic rule injection. Compact, interpretable rules are distilled from failure traces and injected into the prompt during inference to improve task performance. These rules are proposed by the LLM itself and consolidated using a Minimum Description Length (MDL) objective that favors generality and conciseness. Each rule is stored in both natural language and a structured symbolic form, supporting efficient retrieval at inference time. Experiments on tool-use benchmarks show that this approach improves accuracy on both seen and unseen tools without modifying LLM weights. It outperforms prompting-based adaptation methods and complements finetuning, offering an interpretable layer of inference-time generalization. Moreover, rules learned from one LLM can be reused to improve others, including long reasoning LLMs, highlighting the portability of symbolic knowledge across architectures.
From Individual to Common: An Early Exploration of Consensus in Non-verifiable Data for Balanced Preference Optimization
PDF ↗Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has demonstrated remarkable effectiveness in boosting the objective performance (e.g., reasoning) of Large Language Models (LLMs) through rule-based, on-policy self-improvement strategies. However, optimizing LLMs for subjective capabilities and alignment with human preferences remains challenging due to the non-verifiable nature. Most prior works use datasets comprising response pairs with substantial quality gaps labeled by a strong external judge. While effective for preference metrics, this paradigm often incurs an “alignment tax”, where the model’s objective performance on downstream tasks degrades as it overfits to subjective preferences. In this work, we introduce Donkey, a high-quality, non-verifiable dataset where response pairs differ only by subtle nuances. We find that LLMs optimized on Donkey via preference learning outperform those trained on data with explicit quality gaps, while simultaneously maintaining their objective capabilities. Furthermore, we observe that preference signals on Donkey can be decomposed into consensus preferences and individual preferences. Our analysis reveals that distilling consensus preferences provides a significantly more data-efficient signal for preference optimization. Our findings underscore the importance of leveraging nuanced preference signals and the consensus of multiple judges for advancing subjective LLM alignment. Our code and data will be available at https://github.com/SJY8460/Donkey.
Human conversation relies heavily on *conversational implicature*, in which speakers convey meanings that are suggested rather than explicitly stated. Although recent large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong conversational fluency, they remain unreliable when interpretation depends on reasoning that integrates social and contextual cues, a process rarely articulated in text. We introduce **DRinQ**, a benchmark for evaluating pragmatic reasoning about conversational implicature in question utterances, designed to isolate pragmatic variation while holding each question’s surface form fixed. To support scalable evaluation, we propose a semi-automated pipeline that produces question-context-interpretation instances with systematic variation. Across evaluations, we find a consistent generation-inference asymmetry: while state-of-the-art models can generate plausible pragmatic scenarios when guided, they often fail to recover the intended implication at inference time. For smaller models, structured prompting improves alignment with human judgments. A comparative writing study further reveals complementary strengths: human authors tend to produce safer, predictable contexts, whereas models generate varied scenarios with interpretations that sometimes exceed contextual support. These findings highlight persistent challenges in modeling conversational implicature and motivate more context-sensitive evaluation frameworks.
We propose a corpus-dependent alternative to byte encoding that learns fixed-length atomic codes for characters directly from text, which we refer to as Latom (Learned Atom-based Encoding).We instantiate this framework by training an HMM on N-repeated character sequences to estimate "atom" posteriors, followed by a Hungarian assignment yielding a globally optimal one-to-one character-code mapping.Across 14 languages, the encodings improve intrinsic metrics, including token counts after subword tokenization and bigram perplexity, with appropriate code lengths.On Amazon Reviews in six languages, Latom improves text classification accuracy and reduces decoding errors in language model generation.Overall, these results demonstrate that character encodings can be learned from corpus statistics while remaining reversible and compatible with standard tokenization pipelines.
Traditional reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) for large language models (LLMs) relies on expensive human-annotated datasets, while Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF) also incurs significant costs, requiring the collection of diverse prompts and corresponding responses, often necessitating external reward models or proprietary models like GPT-4 to annotate preference pairs. In this work, we introduce Self-Alignment Optimization (SAO), a fully self-synthetic framework for LLM alignment, where all training data, including prompts (i.e., user queries), responses, and preferences, are generated by the model itself. Specifically, SAO first instructs the LLM to engage in persona role-play and generate diverse prompts and responses, which are then self-evaluated for preference optimization. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SAO effectively enhances the model’s chat capabilities on standard benchmarks like AlpacaEval 2.0, while maintaining strong performance on downstream objective tasks (i.e.,, question-answering, math reasoning). Our work provides a practical solution for self-improvement in aligning LLMs, and the code for reproducing our results is available at: https://github.com/SJY8460/SAO.
Confident, Calibrated, or Complicit: Safety Alignment and Ideological Bias in LLM Hate Speech Detection
PDF ↗We investigate the efficacy of Large Language Models (LLMs) in detecting implicit and explicit hate speech, examining how models with minimal safety alignment (uncensored) compare with more heavily aligned (censored) counterparts in a deployed-model setting when deployed using political personas. While uncensored models are often framed as offering a less constrained perspective, our results reveal a trade-off: censored models outperform their uncensored counterparts in both accuracy and robustness, achieving 69.0% versus 64.1% strict accuracy. However, this higher performance is also associated with greater resistance to persona-based influence, while uncensored models are more malleable to ideological framing. Furthermore, we identify critical failures across all models in understanding nuanced language such as irony. We also find alarming fairness disparities in performance across different targeted groups and systemic overconfidence that renders self-reported certainty unreliable. These findings challenge the notion of LLMs as objective arbiters and highlight the need for more sophisticated auditing frameworks that account for fairness, calibration, and ideological consistency. Taken together, these results point to censorship-as-deployed rather than safety alignment in isolation as the more appropriate frame for interpreting model differences.