论文检索

Arturo Oncevay, Elena Kochkina, Keshav Ramani, Toyin Aguda, Simerjot Kaur, Charese Smiley

Domain-specific multilingual terminology is essential for accurate machine translation (MT) and cross-lingual NLP applications. We present a gold-standard terminology resource for the tax and financial education domains, built from curated governmental publications and covering seven typologically diverse languages: English, Spanish, Russian, Vietnamese, Korean, Chinese (traditional and simplified) and Haitian Creole. Using this resource, we assess various MT systems and LLMs on translation quality and term accuracy. We annotate over 3,000 terms for domain-specificity, facilitating a comparison between domain-specific and general term translations, and observe models’ challenges with specialized tax terms. We also analyze the case of terminology-aided translation, and the LLMs’ performance in extracting the translated term given the context. Our results highlight model limitations and the value of high-quality terminologies for advancing MT research in specialized contexts.

Roksana Goworek, Haim Dubossarsky

Cross-lingual transfer allows models to perform tasks in languages unseen during training and is often assumed to benefit from increased multilinguality. In this work, we challenge this assumption in the context of two underexplored, sense-aware tasks: polysemy disambiguation and lexical semantic change. Through a large-scale analysis across 28 languages, we show that multilingual training is neither necessary nor inherently beneficial for effective transfer. Instead, we find that confounding factors, such as fine-tuning data composition and evaluation artifacts, can better account for the perceived advantages of multilinguality. Our findings call for more rigorous evaluations in multilingual NLP, and more nuanced and sensible choice of models for transfer. We release fine-tuned models and benchmarks to support further research, with implications extending to low-resource and typologically diverse languages.

Tanawan Premsri, Parisa Kordjamshidi

Spatial reasoning is a fundamental aspect of human intelligence. One key concept in spatial cognition is the Frame of Reference (FoR), which identifies the perspective of spatial expressions. Despite its significance, FoR has received limited attention in AI models that need spatial intelligence. There is a lack of dedicated benchmarks and in-depth evaluation of large language models (LLMs) in this area. To address this issue, we introduce the Frame of Reference Evaluation in Spatial Reasoning Tasks (FoREST) benchmark, designed to assess FoR comprehension in LLMs. We evaluate LLMs on answering questions that require FoR comprehension and layout generation in text-to-image models using FoREST. Our results reveal a notable performance gap across different FoR classes in various LLMs, affecting their ability to generate accurate layouts for text-to-image generation. This highlights critical shortcomings in FoR comprehension. To improve FoR understanding, we propose Spatial-Guided prompting, which improves LLMs’ ability to extract essential spatial concepts. Our proposed method improves overall performance across spatial reasoning tasks.

Boyang Zhang, Yicong Tan, Yun Shen, Ahmed Salem, Michael Backes, Savvas Zannettou, Yang Zhang

Recently, autonomous agents built on large language models (LLMs) have experienced significant development and are being deployed in real-world applications. Through the usage of tools, these systems can perform actions in the real world. Given the agents’ practical applications and ability to execute consequential actions, such autonomous systems can cause more severe damage than a standalone LLM if compromised. While some existing research has explored harmful actions by LLM agents, our study approaches the vulnerability from a different perspective. We introduce a new type of attack that causes malfunctions by misleading the agent into executing repetitive or irrelevant actions. Our experiments reveal that these attacks can induce failure rates exceeding 80% in multiple scenarios. Through attacks on implemented and deployable agents in multi-agent scenarios, we accentuate the realistic risks associated with these vulnerabilities. To mitigate such attacks, we propose self-examination defense methods. Our findings indicate these attacks are more difficult to detect compared to previous overtly harmful attacks, highlighting the substantial risks associated with this vulnerability.

Akriti Jain, Pritika Ramu, Aparna Garimella, Apoorv Saxena

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in transforming text descriptions or tables to data visualizations via instruction-tuning methods. However, it is not straightforward to apply these methods directly for a more real-world use case of visualizing data from long documents based on user-given intents, as opposed to the user pre-selecting the relevant content manually. We introduce the task of _intent-based chart generation_ from documents: given a user-specified intent and document(s), the goal is to generate a chart adhering to the intent and grounded on the document(s) in a zero-shot setting. We propose an unsupervised, two-staged framework in which an LLM first extracts relevant information from the document(s) by decomposing the intent and iteratively validates and refines this data. Next, a heuristic-guided module selects an appropriate chart type before final code generation. To assess the data accuracy of the generated charts, we propose an attribution-based metric that uses a structured textual representation of charts, instead of relying on visual decoding metrics that often fail to capture the chart data effectively. To validate our approach, we curate a dataset comprising of 1,242 <intent, document, charts> tuples from two domains, finance and scientific, in contrast to the existing datasets that are largely limited to parallel text descriptions/ tables and their corresponding charts. We compare our approach with baselines using single-shot chart generation using LLMs and query-based retrieval methods; our method outperforms by upto 9 points and 17 points in terms of chart data accuracy and chart type respectively over the best baselines.

Sina Abbasi, Mohammad Reza Modarres, Mohammad Taher Pilehvar

With new large language models (LLMs) emerging frequently, it is important to consider the potential value of model-agnostic approaches that can provide interpretability across a variety of architectures. While recent advances in LLM interpretability show promise, many rely on complex, model-specific methods with high computational costs. To address these limitations, we propose NormXLogit, a novel technique for assessing the significance of individual input tokens. This method operates based on the input and output representations associated with each token. First, we demonstrate that the norm of word embeddings can be utilized as a measure of token importance. Second, we reveal a significant relationship between a token’s importance and how predictive its representation is of the model’s final output. Extensive analyses indicate that our approach outperforms existing gradient-based methods in terms of faithfulness and offers competitive performance compared to leading architecture-specific techniques.

Fagun Patel, Duc Q. Nguyen, Sang T. Truong, Jody Vaynshtok, Sanmi Koyejo, Nick Haber

According to the U.S. National Institutes of Health, more than 3.4 million children experience speech disorders that require clinical intervention. The number of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) is roughly 20 times fewer than the number of affected children, highlighting a significant gap in children’s care and a pressing need for technological support that improves the productivity of SLPs. State-of-the-art multimodal language models (MLMs) show promise for supporting SLPs, but their use remains underexplored largely due to a limited understanding of their performance in high-stakes clinical settings. To address this gap, we collaborate with domain experts to develop a taxonomy of real-world use cases of MLMs in speech-language pathologies. Building on this taxonomy, we introduce the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating MLM across five core use cases, each containing 1,000 manually annotated data points. This benchmark includes robustness and sensitivity tests under various settings, including background noise, speaker gender, and accent. Our evaluation of 15 state-of-the-art MLMs reveals that no single model consistently outperforms others across all tasks. Notably, we find systematic disparities, with models performing better on male speakers, and observe that chain-of-thought prompting can degrade performance on classification tasks with large label spaces and narrow decision boundaries. Furthermore, we study fine-tuning MLMs on domain-specific data, achieving improvements of over 30% compared to base models. These findings highlight both the potential and limitations of current MLMs for speech-language pathology applications, underscoring the need for further research and targeted development.

Libo Zhao, Jing Li, Ziqian Zeng

Simultaneous machine translation (SiMT) necessitates a robust read/write (R/W) policy to determine the optimal moments for translation, thereby balancing translation quality and latency. Effective timing in translation can align source and target tokens accurately. The attention mechanism within translation models inherently provides valuable alignment information. Building on this, previous research has attempted to modify the attention mechanism’s structure to leverage its alignment properties during training, employing multi-task learning to derive the read/write policy. However, this multi-task learning approach may compromise the efficacy of the attention mechanism itself. This raises a natural question: why not directly learn the read/write policy from the well-trained attention mechanism? In this study, we propose DrFrattn, a method that directly learns adaptive policies from the attention mechanism. Experimental results across various benchmarks demonstrate that our approach achieves an improved balance between translation accuracy and latency.

Junghwan Kim, Haotian Zhang, David Jurgens

Authorship representation (AR) learning, which models an author’s unique writing style, has demonstrated strong performance in authorship attribution tasks. However, prior research has primarily focused on monolingual settings—mostly in English—leaving the potential benefits of multilingual AR models underexplored. We introduce a novel method for multilingual AR learning that incorporates two key innovations: probabilistic content masking, which encourages the model to focus on stylistically indicative words rather than content-specific words, and language-aware batching, which improves contrastive learning by reducing cross-lingual interference. Our model is trained on over 4.5 million authors across 36 languages and 13 domains. It consistently outperforms monolingual baselines in 21 out of 22 non-English languages, achieving an average Recall@8 improvement of 4.85%, with a maximum gain of 15.91% in a single language. Furthermore, it exhibits stronger cross-lingual and cross-domain generalization compared to a monolingual model trained solely on English. Our analysis confirms the effectiveness of both proposed techniques, highlighting their critical roles in the model’s improved performance.

Sina Semnani, Jirayu Burapacheep, Arpandeep Khatua, Thanawan Atchariyachanvanit, Zheng Wang, Monica Lam

Wikipedia is the largest open knowledge corpus, widely used worldwide and serving as a key resource for training large language models (LLMs) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. Ensuring its accuracy is therefore critical. But how accurate is Wikipedia, and how can we improve it?We focus on inconsistencies, a specific type of factual inaccuracy, and introduce the task of corpus-level inconsistency detection. We present CLAIRE, an agentic system that combines LLM reasoning with retrieval to surface potentially inconsistent claims along with contextual evidence for human review. In a user study with experienced Wikipedia editors, 87.5% reported higher confidence when using CLAIRE, and participants identified 64.7% more inconsistencies in the same amount of time.Combining CLAIRE with human annotation, we contribute WIKICOLLIDE, the first benchmark of real Wikipedia inconsistencies. Using random sampling with CLAIRE-assisted analysis, we find that at least 3.3% of English Wikipedia facts contradict another fact, with inconsistencies propagating into 7.3% of FEVEROUS and 4.0% of AmbigQA examples. Benchmarking strong baselines on this dataset reveals substantial headroom: the best fully automated system achieves an AUROC of only 75.1%.Our results show that contradictions are a measurable component of Wikipedia and that LLM-based systems like CLAIRE can provide a practical tool to help editors improve knowledge consistency at scale.

Inbar Pendzel, Einat Minkov

Social text understanding is prone to fail when opinions are conveyed implicitly or sarcastically. It is therefore desired to model users’ contexts in processing the texts authored by them. In this work, we represent users within a social embedding space that was learned from the Twitter network at large-scale. Similar to word embeddings that encode lexical semantics, the network embeddings encode latent dimensions of social semantics. We perform extensive experiments on author-informed stance prediction, demonstrating improved generalization through inductive social user modeling, both within and across topics. Similar results were obtained for author-informed toxicity and incivility detection. The proposed approach may pave way to social NLP that considers user embeddings as contextual modality. However, our investigation also reveals that user stances are correlated with the personal socio-demographic traits encoded in their embeddings. Hence, author-informed NLP approaches may inadvertently model and reinforce socio-demographic and other social biases.

Sina Semnani, Han Zhang, Xinyan He, Merve Tekgurler, Monica Lam

Accurate text recognition for historical documents can greatly advance the study and preservation of cultural heritage. Existing vision-language models (VLMs), however, are designed for modern, standardized texts and are not equipped to read the diverse languages and scripts, irregular layouts, and frequent degradation found in historical materials.This paper presents CHURRO, a 3B-parameter open-weight VLM specialized for historical text recognition. The model is trained on CHURRO-DS, the largest historical text recognition dataset to date. CHURRO-DS unifies 155 historical corpora comprising 99,491 pages, spanning 22 centuries of textual heritage across 46 language clusters, including historical variants and dead languages.We evaluate several open-weight and closed VLMs and optical character recognition (OCR) systems on CHURRO-DS and find that CHURRO outperforms all other VLMs. On the CHURRO-DS test set, CHURRO achieves 82.3% (printed) and 70.1% (handwritten) normalized Levenshtein similarity, surpassing the second-best model, Gemini 2.5 Pro, by 1.4% and 6.5%, respectively, while being 15.5 times more cost-effective.By releasing the model and dataset, we aim to enable community-driven research to improve the readability of historical texts and accelerate scholarship.

Rachneet Singh Sachdeva, Rima Hazra, Iryna Gurevych

Large language models, despite extensive alignment with human values and ethical principles, remain vulnerable to sophisticated jailbreak attacks that exploit their reasoning abilities. Existing safety measures often detect overt malicious intent but fail to address subtle, reasoning-driven vulnerabilities. In this work, we introduce POATE (Polar Opposite query generation, Adversarial Template construction, and Elaboration), a novel jailbreak technique that harnesses contrastive reasoning to provoke unethical responses. POATE crafts semantically opposing intents and integrates them with adversarial templates, steering models toward harmful outputs with remarkable subtlety. We conduct extensive evaluation across six diverse language model families of varying parameter sizes to demonstrate the robustness of the attack, achieving significantly higher attack success rates (44%) compared to existing methods. To counter this, we propose Intent-Aware CoT and Reverse Thinking CoT, which decompose queries to detect malicious intent and reason in reverse to evaluate and reject harmful responses. These methods enhance reasoning robustness and strengthen the model’s defense against adversarial exploits.

Denis Janiak, Jakub Binkowski, Albert Sawczyn, Bogdan Gabrys, Ravid Shwartz-Ziv, Tomasz Jan Kajdanowicz

Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, yet their tendency to hallucinate poses serious challenges for reliable deployment. Despite numerous hallucination detection methods, their evaluations often rely on ROUGE, a metric based on lexical overlap that misaligns with human judgments. Through comprehensive human studies, we demonstrate that while ROUGE exhibits high recall, its extremely low precision leads to misleading performance estimates. In fact, several established detection methods show performance drops of up to 45.9% when assessed using human-aligned metrics like LLM-as-Judge. Moreover, our analysis reveals that simple heuristics based on response length can rival complex detection techniques, exposing a fundamental flaw in current evaluation practices. We argue that adopting semantically aware and robust evaluation frameworks is essential to accurately gauge the true performance of hallucination detection methods, ultimately ensuring the trustworthiness of LLM outputs.

Sourjyadip Ray, Shubham Sharma, Somak Aditya, Pawan Goyal

As digital platforms redefine educational paradigms, ensuring interactivity remains vital for effective learning. This paper explores using Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to automatically respond to student questions from online lectures - a novel question answering task of real world significance. We introduce the EduVidQA Dataset with 5252 question-answer pairs (both synthetic and real-world) from 296 computer science videos covering diverse topics and difficulty levels. To understand the needs of the dataset and task evaluation, we empirically study the qualitative preferences of students, which we provide as an important contribution to this line of work. Our benchmarking experiments consist of 6 state-of-the-art MLLMs, through which we study the effectiveness of our synthetic data for finetuning, as well as showing the challenging nature of the task. We evaluate the models using both text-based and qualitative metrics, thus showing a nuanced perspective of the models’ performance, which is paramount to future work. This work not only sets a benchmark for this important problem, but also opens exciting avenues for future research in the field of Natural Language Processing for Education.

Michel Olvera, Changhong Wang, Paraskevas Stamatiadis, Gaël Richard, Slim Essid

Contrastive Language–Audio Pretraining (CLAP) models learn by aligning audio and text in a shared embedding space, enabling powerful zero-shot recognition. However, their performance is highly sensitive to prompt formulation and language nuances, and they often inherit semantic ambiguities and spurious correlations from noisy pretraining data. While prior work has explored prompt engineering, adapters, and prefix tuning to address these limitations, the use of structured prior knowledge remains largely unexplored. We present iKnow-audio, a framework that integrates knowledge graphs with audio-language models to provide robust semantic grounding. iKnow-audio builds on the Audio-centric Knowledge Graph (AKG), which encodes ontological relations comprising semantic, causal, and taxonomic connections reflective of everyday sound scenes and events. By training knowlege graph embedding models on the AKG and refining CLAP predictions through this structured knowledge, iKnow-audio improves disambiguation of acoustically similar sounds and reduces reliance on prompt engineering. Comprehensive zero-shot evaluations across six benchmark datasets demonstrate consistent gains over baseline CLAP, supported by embedding-space analyses that highlight improved relational grounding. Resources are publicly available at https://github.com/michelolzam/iknow-audio

Aakash Kumar Agarwal, Saprativa Bhattacharjee, Mauli Rastogi, Jemima S. Jacob, Biplab Banerjee, Rashmi Gupta, Pushpak Bhattacharyya

Almost 50% depression patients face the risk of going into relapse. The risk increases to 80% after the second episode of depression. Although, depression detection from social media has attained considerable attention, depression relapse detection has remained largely unexplored due to the lack of curated datasets and the difficulty of distinguishing relapse and non-relapse users. In this work, we present ReDepress, the first clinically validated social media dataset focused on relapse, comprising 204 Reddit users annotated by mental health professionals. Unlike prior approaches, our framework draws on cognitive theories of depression, incorporating constructs such as attention bias, interpretation bias, memory bias and rumination into both annotation and modeling. Through statistical analyses and machine learning experiments, we demonstrate that cognitive markers significantly differentiate relapse and non-relapse groups, and that models enriched with these features achieve competitive performance, with transformer-based temporal models attaining an F1 of 0.86. Our findings validate psychological theories in real-world textual data and underscore the potential of cognitive-informed computational methods for early relapse detection, paving the way for scalable, low-cost interventions in mental healthcare.

Ines Rehbein, Ines Reinig, Simone Paolo Ponzetto

The construct of morality permeates our entire lives and influences our behavior and how we perceive others. It therefore comes at no surprise that morality also plays an important role in politics, as morally framed arguments are perceived as more appealing and persuasive. Thus, being able to identify moral framing in political communication and to detect subtle differences in politicians’ moral framing can provide the basis for many interesting analyses in the political sciences. In the paper, we release MoralFramingInPolitics (MFiP), a new corpus of German parliamentary debates where the speakers’ moral framing has been coded, using the framework of Moral Foundations Theory (MFT). Our fine-grained annotations distinguish different types of moral frames and also include narrative roles, together with the moral foundations for each frame. We then present models for frame type and moral foundation classification and explore the benefits of data augmentation (DA) and contrastive learning (CL) for the two tasks. All data and code will be made available to the research community.

Souha Ben Hassine, Asma Arrak, Marouene Addhoum, Steven R. Wilson

In this work, we introduce the first benchmark for evaluating the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in understanding and generating responses in Tunisian Arabic. To achieve this, we construct a dataset of Tunisian Arabic instructions and prompt ten widely-used LLMs that claim to support Arabic. We then assess the LLM responses through both human and LLM-based evaluations across four criteria: quality, correctness, relevance, and dialectal adherence. We analyze the agreement and correlation between these judgments and identify GPT-4o as our automated judge model based on its high correlation with human ratings, and generate a final leaderboard using this model. Our error analysis reveals that most LLMs struggle with recognizing and properly responding in Tunisian Arabic. To facilitate further research, we release our dataset, along with gold-standard human-written responses for all 744 instructions, and our evaluation framework, allowing others to benchmark their own models.

Esra Dönmez, Maximilian Maurer, Gabriella Lapesa, Agnieszka Falenska

Distinguishing LLM-generated text from human-written is a key challenge for safe and ethical NLP, particularly in high-stake settings such as persuasive online discourse. While recent work focuses on detection, real-world use cases also demand interpretable tools to help humans understand and distinguish LLM-generated texts. To this end, we present an analysis framework comparing human- and LLM-authored arguments using two easily-interpretable feature sets: general-purpose linguistic features (e.g., lexical richness, syntactic complexity) and domain-specific features related to argument quality (e.g., logical soundness, engagement strategies). Applied to */r/ChangeMyView* arguments by humans and three LLMs, our method reveals clear patterns: LLM-generated counter-arguments show lower type-token and lemma-token ratios but higher emotional intensity — particularly in anticipation and trust. They more closely resemble textbook-quality arguments — cogent, justified, explicitly respectful toward others, and positive in tone. Moreover, counter-arguments generated by LLMs converge more closely with the original post’s style and quality than those written by humans. Finally, we demonstrate that these differences enable a lightweight, interpretable, and highly effective classifier for detecting LLM-generated comments in CMV.