论文检索

Weipeng Jiang, Xiaoyu Zhang, Juan Zhai, Shiqing Ma, Chao Shen, Yang Liu

Emoticons are widely used in digital communication to convey affective intent, yet their safety implications for Large Language Models (LLMs) remain largely unexplored. In this paper, we identify emoticon semantic confusion, a vulnerability where LLMs misinterpret ASCII-based emoticons to perform unintended and even destructive actions. To systematically study this phenomenon, we develop an automated data generation pipeline and construct a dataset containing 3,757 code-oriented test cases spanning 21 meta-scenarios, four programming languages, and varying contextual complexities. Our study on six LLMs reveals that emoticon semantic confusion is pervasive, with an average confusion ratio exceeding 38%. More critically, over 90% of confused responses yield ’silent failures’, which are syntactically valid outputs but deviate from user intent, potentially leading to destructive security consequences.Furthermore, we observe that this vulnerability readily transfers to popular agent frameworks, while existing prompt-based mitigations remain largely ineffective. We call on the community to recognize this emerging vulnerability and develop effective mitigation methods to uphold the safety and reliability of human-LLM interactions.

Sen Hu, Yuxiang Wei, Jiaxin Ran, Xueran Han, Zhiyuan Yao, Huacan Wang, Ronghao Chen, Lei Zou

该来源暂未提供摘要。

Chenyang Shao, Sijian Ren, Fengli Xu, Yong Li

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in complex reasoning tasks, yet their autoregressive generation paradigm makes it computationally expensive to explore diverse reasoning paths. In contrast, diffusion language models (DLMs) adopt a parallel, non-autoregressive generation mechanism that enables the efficient production of diverse candidate outputs. Motivated by this complementarity, we explore a collaborative reasoning framework that combines diffusion-based generation with autoregressive evaluation. Specifically, we leverage DLMs to efficiently generate diverse intermediate reasoning thoughts, and employ LLMs as evaluators to assess and select candidates based on their plausibility and correctness. By decoupling proposal generation from evaluation, our framework exploits the strengths of both models: efficient exploration from diffusion models and causally grounded assessment from autoregressive models, which naturally aligns with the divergent-convergent thinking framework in cognitive psychology. Experiments across various mathematical and logical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our framework improves inference efficiency while maintaining competitive or superior reasoning accuracy, laying the groundwork for building efficient reasoning architectures. Our code is open-source at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Diffuse-Thinking-EC60.

Yuanzhen Hao, Desheng Wu

First-order logic (FOL) is a fundamental formalism for factual reasoning over knowledge graphs (KGs), e.g. in researches of KG-based fact verification and logical consistency or reasoning of large language models (LLM). However, existing benchmarks and approaches insufficiently capture many claims that require comparison or counting, and lack support for several FOL quantifiers and connectives. To address these challenges and expand the expressive capacity of FOL for KG-based reasoning, we introduce FOLX-KG, a novel extended FOL \sigma-structure over KGs that incorporates comparison predicates and counting quantifiers. Using this extended logic, we construct Fact-FOLX-KG, a fact verification dataset consisting of 43,821 KG-based claim–formula pairs designed to enable systematic study of richer logical forms and reasoning types. We further propose FOLX Prover, an executable program-guided logic reasoning pipeline adapted for KG-based factual reasoning under the extended FOL. Experimental results show that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on Fact-FOLX-KG, while previous methods experience performance drop on claims requiring comparison and counting. These findings demonstrate the importance of extended logical expressiveness for robust factual reasoning over KGs.

Shufang Xie, Qizhi Pei, Ang Lv, Jingyang Hu, Lijun Wu, Rui Yan

AI development is often framed as the outcome of isolated research and engineering efforts, yet evidence from deployed systems suggests that language models interact through a shared data ecosystem. While the optimization of individual models is extensively studied, the emergent properties of this interconnected population remain largely unexplored, limiting our ability to predict long-term ecosystem trajectories We term this process data pollination, the unintentional circulation of synthetic model outputs through shared online platforms and web-scale training corpora, and formalize it as a population-based evolutionary framework to investigate stability dynamics under synthetic data training. Our theoretical analysis and controlled experiments involving 320 language models demonstrate that population dynamics can mitigate the model collapse observed in single-lineage recursive training, yielding stable or improving performance across diverse benchmarks. Crucially, we find that ecological diversity functions as a fundamental resilience mechanism that safeguards the ecosystem against collapse, highlighting the critical importance of maintaining model diversity for sustainable AI development.

Shaonan Liu, Guo Yu, Xiaoling Luo, Shiyi Zheng, Jie Liu, Wenting Chen, Linlin Shen

Medical Multimodal Large Language Models (Med-MLLMs) require egocentric clinical intent understanding for real-world deployment, yet existing benchmarks fail to evaluate this critical capability. We introduce MedGaze-Bench, the first benchmark leveraging clinician gaze as a Cognitive Cursor to assess intent understanding across surgery, emergency simulation, and diagnostic interpretation. Our benchmark addresses three fundamental challenges: visual homogeneity of anatomical structures, strict temporal-causal dependencies in clinical workflows, and implicit adherence to safety protocols. We propose a Three-Dimensional Clinical Intent Framework evaluating: (1) Spatial Intent—discriminating precise targets amid visual noise, (2) Temporal Intent—inferring causal rationale through retrospective and prospective reasoning, and (3) Standard Intent—verifying protocol compliance through safety checks. Beyond accuracy metrics, we introduce Trap QA mechanisms to stress-test clinical reliability by penalizing hallucinations and cognitive sycophancy. Experiments reveal current MLLMs struggle with egocentric intent due to over-reliance on global features, leading to fabricated observations and uncritical acceptance of invalid instructions.

Xiping Li, Jianghong Ma

Interleaved-Modal Chain-of-Thought (I-MCoT) advances vision-language reasoning, such as Visual Question Answering (VQA). This paradigm integrates specially selected visual evidence from the input image into the context of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), enabling them to ground their reasoning logic in these details. Accordingly, the efficacy of an I-MCoT framework relies on identifying *what* to see (evidence selection) and *when* to see it (triggering of insertions). However, existing methods fall short in both aspects. First, for selection, they rely on attention signals, which are unreliable—particularly under severe granularity imbalance between the brief textual query and the informative image. Second, for triggering, they adopt static triggers, which fail to capture the VLMs’ dynamic needs for visual evidence. To this end, we propose a novel I-MCoT framework, **A**ctive **I**nformation-driven **M**ulti-modal **C**hain-**o**f-**T**hought (**AIM-CoT**), which aims to improve both evidence selection and insertion triggering via: (1) **Context-enhanced Attention-map Generation (CAG)** to mitigate granularity imbalance via textual context enhancement; (2) **Active Visual Probing (AVP)** to proactively select the most informative evidence via an information foraging process; and (3) **Dynamic Attention-shift Trigger (DAT)** to precisely activate insertions when VLM’s attention shifts from text to visual context. Experiments across three benchmarks and four backbones demonstrate AIM-CoT’s consistent superiority. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/AIMCoT.

Jinliang Liu, Jiale Bai, Shaoning Zeng

Large language models (LLMs) still struggle with multi-hop reasoning over knowledge-graphs (KGs), and we identify a previously overlooked structural reason for this difficulty: Transformer attention heads naturally specialize in distinct semantic relations across reasoning stages, forming a hop-aligned relay pattern. This key finding suggests that multi-hop reasoning is inherently multi-view, yet existing KG-based retrieval-augmented generation (KG-RAG) systems collapse all reasoning hops into a single representation, flat embedding space, suppressing this implicit structure and causing noisy or drifted path exploration. We introduce ParallaxRAG, a symmetric multi-view framework that decouples queries and KGs into aligned, head-specific retrieval spaces. By enforcing relational diversity across heads while constraining weakly related paths, ParallaxRAG constructs more accurate, cleaner subgraphs and guides LLMs through grounded, hop-wise reasoning. On WebQSP and CWQ, it achieves state-of-the-art retrieval and QA performance, substantially reduces hallucination, and generalizes strongly to the biomedical BioASQ benchmark. Our implementation is available at https://github.com/LucaLiu1313/ParallaxRAG.

Xiao Sun, Ymyang, Xinyi Jiang, Yu Tian, Junnan Zhu, Jiang Zhong, Qin Lei, Jingwang Huang, Haoyang Zeng, Xinyu Zhou 等

Mental health disorders represent a burgeoning global public health challenge. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential in psychiatric assessment, their clinical utility is severely constrained by benchmarks that lack ecological validity and fine-grained diagnostic supervision. To bridge this gap, we introduce \textbf{MentalDx Bench}, the first benchmark dedicated to disorder-level psychiatric diagnosis within real-world clinical settings. Comprising 712 de-identified electronic health records annotated by board-certified psychiatrists under ICD-11 guidelines, the benchmark covers 76 disorders across 16 diagnostic categories. Evaluation of 18 LLMs reveals a critical \textit{paradigm misalignment}: strong performance at coarse diagnostic categorization contrasts with systematic failure at disorder-level diagnosis, underscoring a gap between pattern-based modeling and clinical hypothetico-deductive reasoning.In response, we propose \textbf{MentalSeek-Dx}, a medical-specialized LLM trained to internalize this clinical reasoning process through supervised trajectory construction and curriculum-based reinforcement learning. Experiments on MentalDx Bench demonstrate that MentalSeek-Dx achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance with only 14B parameters, establishing a clinically grounded framework for reliable psychiatric diagnosis. The dataset and code are available.

Zenghao Liu, Yansong Zhang

The rapid expansion of the Model Context Protocol (MCP) ecosystem introduces a combinatorially complex tool space, rendering existing frameworks inadequate for comprehensive agent evaluation. To address this problem, we propose SGVEF-LOOP, a coverage-guided framework for progressive topological exploration and fact-augmented metamorphic testing. SGVEF operates via a synergistic closed loop: it navigates sparse regions using adaptive sampling, synthesizes oracle-free metamorphic pairs grounded in static knowledge, enforces dual-constraint validation to ensure consistency and solvability, and leverages execution feedback to iteratively optimize exploration. Deploying this framework yields a high-fidelity benchmark achieving 100% node coverage and saturating 80.54% of the theoretical transition bound (estimated via Chao1). Evaluation of 8 diverse MCP Agents reveals capability stratification and exposes critical behavioral anomalies—such as reasoning instability—that conventional metrics fail to capture. Consequently, this work establishes a generalizable paradigm for scalable, rigorous agent evaluation in dynamic environments.

Jiahao Xiong, Yihe Liu, Xianming Hu, Hongbo Zhao, Nuoyi Chen, Jie Zhang, Kai Zhang

Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) for large language models (LLMs) has achieved significant success in various domains. So far, most algorithms in the LoRA-family rely on global low-rank factors spanning the entire update weight matrix (\Delta \mathbf{W}). Through careful analysis, however, we observe that the \Delta \mathbf{W} during fine-tuning typically exhibit heterogeneous subspace clusters, each corresponding to specific sub-sets of rows and columns. This structural heterogeneity suggests that global low-rank factors may not optimally capture the local variations needed for effective model adaptation. To address this limitation, we propose LoRA within Clustered Parameter Subspaces, or CPS-LoRA, which performs independent low-rank updates within clustered blocks of parameter matrices. The key idea is to group the rows/columns of the update matrix into locally coherent, and maximally uncorrelated subspaces, perform low-rank adaptations in each subspace, and iteratively update the partition and local adaptations. This allows adapting to local structures more precisely while preserving high efficiency. Theoretical analysis reveals that in case \Delta \mathbf{W} can be partitioned into subspace blocks with non-overlapping basis, CPS-LoRA have superior parameter efficiency than global adaptations. Empirical evaluations further demonstrate better rank utilization of CPS-LoRA and its consistent improvements against LoRA (and variants) by up to 3.0% in absolute accuracy in various benchmarks.

Xilai Ma, Liye Zhao, Weijun Yao, Haibing Di, Wenya Wang, Jing Li

Large Language Model (LLM) personalization aims to align model behaviors with individual user preferences.Existing methods often focus on isolated user histories, neglecting the essential role of inter-user differences.We propose C-BPO, a framework that personalizes LLMs via preference-calibrated binary signals.By treating target user data as positive feedback and other users’ data as an auxiliary set of implicit negative signals, C-BPO captures distinct inter-user differences.To mitigate the preference overlap issue, where shared task knowledge is erroneously penalized, we derive an objective grounded in Positive-Unlabeled (PU) learning theory.This approach purifies negative signals by subtracting “positive bias”, ensuring alignment with unique idiosyncrasies without compromising general helpfulness.Empirical experiments across various personalization tasks and backbone LLMs show C-BPO consistently outperforms baselines, demonstrating the efficacy of preference-calibrated binary signals in modeling inter-user differences.

Siran Liu, Zane Cao, Yongchao He

Chain-of-Thought reasoning significantly improves the performance of large language models on complex tasks, but incurs high inference latency due to long generation traces. Step-level speculative reasoning aims to mitigate this cost, yet existing approaches face a long-standing trade-off among accuracy, inference speed, and resource efficiency. We propose ConfSpec, a confidence-gated cascaded verification framework that resolves this trade-off. Our key insight is an asymmetry between generation and verification: while generating a correct reasoning step requires substantial model capacity, step-level verification is a constrained discriminative task for which small draft models are well-calibrated within their competence range, enabling high-confidence draft decisions to be accepted directly while selectively escalating uncertain cases to the large target model. Evaluation across diverse workloads shows that ConfSpec achieves up to 2.24\times end-to-end speedups while matching target-model accuracy. Our method requires no external judge models and is orthogonal to token-level speculative decoding, enabling further multiplicative acceleration.

Guanglu Sun, Xinyu Liu, Lili Liang, Yang Yu, Fei Lang, Suxia Zhu, Ming Liu

In real-world scenarios, multimodal information continuously evolves, with new entity and relation types emerging, necessitating timely updates to multimodal knowledge graphs for supporting downstream tasks. However, existing methods struggle to balance real-time adaptability and computational efficiency in continual learning scenarios. To this end, this paper proposes the Continual Multimodal Entity and Relation Joint Extraction (CMERJE) task and a Multimodal Prompt-based Boundary-enhanced Continual (MPBoCo) framework. Specifically, MPBoCo incrementally stores task-specific knowledge via learnable multimodal prompts, dynamically matches relevant prompts for each instance, and fuses them into a frozen backbone model for task-specific reasoning. Subsequently, the boundary-enhanced dual-branch module leverages the auxiliary branch to preserve local syntactic continuity and provide boundary guidance. Experimental results demonstrate that MPBoCo achieves superior performance in real-world scenarios, significantly outperforming baseline methods by 5.5% and 7.2% in 10-task and 5-task settings, respectively.

Xiaocheng Zhang, Xi Wang, Yifei Lu, Jianing Wang, Zhuangzhuang Ye, Mengjiao Bao, Peng Yan, Xiaohong Su

With the surge of online misinformation, Large Language Models (LLMs) and Reasoning Large Language Models (RLMs) serving as Automatic Fact-Checking (AFC) systems have emerged as a prominent paradigm for reliable, explainable verification. However, our empirical study reveals that this paradigm faces a critical risk asymmetry challenge when deployed in real-world under resource-constrained environments. While Hotspot Perception Ability (HPA), the capacity to dynamically allocate reasoning resources based on social impact, is essential to mitigate this risk, existing benchmarks lack the social metadata and evaluation framework to meet this urgent evaluation needs, thereby hindering the advancement of these AFC systems. To bridge this gap, we introduce TrendFact, the first benchmark capable of evaluating HPA and three fact-checking tasks. It consists of 7,643 curated samples sourced from trending platforms and professional datasets, with an evidence library containing 366,634 entries. To enable HPA assessment, we propose two novel metrics: the Explanation Consistency Score (ECS) to evaluate the reliability of verification reasoning, and the Hotspot Claim Perception Index (HCPI) to quantify the overall HPA of AFC systems. Extensive experiments demonstrate that existing AFC systems exhibit limited performance on TrendFact. Furthermore, our proposed FactISR framework effectively enhances HPA and computational efficiency for RLM-driven systems.

Xiangxu Zhang, Lei Li, Yanyun Zhou, Xiao Zhou, Yingying Zhang, Xian Wu

Medical diagnostics is a high-stakes and complex domain that is critical to patient care. However, current evaluations of large language models (LLMs) remain limited in capturing key challenges of clinical diagnostic scenarios. Most rely on benchmarks derived from public exams, raising contamination bias that can inflate performance, and they overlook the confounded nature of real consultations beyond textbook cases. Recent dynamic evaluations offer a promising alternative, but often remain insufficient for diagnosis-oriented benchmarking, with limited coverage of clinically grounded confounders and trustworthiness beyond accuracy. To address these gaps, we propose DyReMe, a dynamic benchmark for medical diagnostics that provides a controlled and scalable stress test of diagnostic robustness. Unlike static exam-style questions, DyReMe generates fresh, consultation-style cases that incorporate clinically grounded confounders, such as differential diagnoses and common misdiagnosis factors. It also varies expression styles to capture heterogeneous patient-style descriptions. Beyond accuracy, DyReMe evaluates LLMs on three additional clinically relevant dimensions: veracity, helpfulness, and consistency. Our experiments show that this dynamic approach yields more challenging assessments and exposes substantial weaknesses of stateof-the-art LLMs under clinically confounded diagnostic settings. These findings highlight the urgent need for evaluation frameworks that better assess trustworthy medical diagnostics under clinically grounded confounders.

Hongcheng Liu, Yuhao Wang, Zhe Chen, Pingjie Wang, Zhiyuan Zhu, Yixuan Hou, Yanfeng Wang, Yu Wang

Omni Large Language Models (Omni-LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in holistic multi-modal perception, yet they consistently falter in complex scenarios requiring synergistic omni-modal reasoning. Beyond understanding global multimodal context, effective reasoning also hinges on fine-grained cross-modal alignment, especially identifying shared referents across modalities, yet this aspect has been largely overlooked. To bridge this gap, we formalize the challenge as a cross-modal coreference problem, where a model must localize a referent in a source modality and re-identify it in a target modality. Building on this paradigm, we introduce CrossOmni, a dataset comprising nine tasks equipped with human-designed reasoning rationales to evaluate and enhance this capability. Experiments on 13 Omni-LLMs reveal systematic weaknesses in cross-modal coreference, which we attribute to the absence of coreference-aware thinking patterns. To address this, we enhance cross-modal alignment via two strategies: a training-free In-Context Learning method and a training-based SFT+GRPO framework designed to induce such thinking patterns. Both approaches yield substantial performance gains and generalize effectively to collaborative reasoning tasks. Overall, our findings highlight cross-modal coreference as a crucial missing piece for advancing robust omni-modal reasoning.

Zhewen Tan, Wenhan Yu, Jianfeng Si, Tongxin Liu, Kaiqi Guan, Huiyan Jin, Jiawen Tao, Xiaokun Yuan, Xiangzheng Zhang, Duohe Ma 等

In recent years, safety risks associated with large language models have become increasingly prominent, highlighting the urgent need to mitigate the generation of toxic and harmful content. The mainstream paradigm for LLM safety alignment typically adopts a collaborative framework involving three roles: an attacker for adversarial prompt generation, a defender for safety defense, and an evaluator for response assessment. In this paper, we propose a closed-loop reinforcement learning framework called TriPlay-RL that enables iterative and co-improving collaboration among three roles with near-zero manual annotation. Experimental results show that the attacker preserves high output diversity while achieving a 20%–50% improvement in adversarial effectiveness. The defender attains 10%–30% gains in safety performance without degrading general reasoning capability, and the evaluator continuously refines its fine-grained judgment ability through iterations, accurately distinguishing unsafe responses, simple refusals, and useful guidance. Overall, our framework establishes an efficient and scalable paradigm for LLM safety alignment, enabling continuous co-evolution within a unified learning loop. The code is available at https://github.com/Qihoo360/TriPlay-RL.

Yan Liu, Feng Zhang, Zhanyu Ma, Jun Xu, Jiuchong Gao, Jinghua Hao, Renqing He, Han Liu, Yangdong Deng

High-quality chain-of-thought has demonstrated strong potential for unlocking the reasoning capabilities of large language models. However, current paradigms typically treat the reasoning process as an indivisible sequence, lacking an intrinsic mechanism to quantify step-wise information gain. This granularity gap manifests in two limitations: inference inefficiency from redundant exploration without explicit guidance, and optimization difficulty due to sparse outcome supervision or costly external verifiers. In this work, we propose CoT-Flow, a framework that reconceptualizes discrete reasoning steps as a continuous probabilistic flow, quantifying the contribution of each step toward the ground-truth answer. Built on this formulation, CoT-Flow enables two complementary methodologies: flow-guided decoding, which employs a greedy flow-based decoding strategy to extract information-efficient reasoning paths, and flow-based reinforcement learning, which constructs a verifier-free dense reward function. Experiments on challenging benchmarks demonstrate that CoT-Flow achieves a superior balance between inference efficiency and reasoning performance.

Changhao Jiang, Ming Zhang, Yifei Cao, Junjie Ye, Xiaoran Fan, Shihan Dou, Zhiheng Xi, Jiajun Sun, Yi Dong, Yujiong Shen 等

The GPT-4 technical report suggests that downstream performance can be predicted from pre-training signals, but offers little methodological detail on how to quantify this. This work address this gap by modeling knowledge retention, the capacity of a pre-trained language model to memorize factual information from its corpus, and introduce a principled method to estimate it prior to training. We propose Size-dependent Mutual Information (SMI), an information-theoretic predictor that integrates knowledge frequency, knowledge specificity, and model size to forecast closed-book question answering (QA) accuracy. SMI is validated through large-scale document retrieval over the disclosed pre-training corpora of 21 public and 3 custom models, combined with a robust multi-template QA evaluation. Experiments show that SMI significantly outperforms repetition-based baselines and achieves R² > 0.7 in predicting QA accuracy for models above 1B parameters, without additional training. The analysis further reveals diminishing returns from scaling data and model size and provides evidence for an intrinsic upper bound on knowledge retention achievable by pre-training alone, motivating retrieval and other augmentation strategies.