论文检索

Jiatan Huang, Mingchen Li, Zonghai Yao, Dawei Li, Yuxin Zhang, Zhichao Yang, Yongkang Xiao, Feiyun Ouyang, Xiaohan Li, Shuo Han 等

Answering complex real-world questions in the medical domain often requires accurate retrieval from medical Textual Knowledge Graphs (medical TKGs), as the relational path information from TKGs could enhance the inference ability of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, the main bottlenecks lie in the scarcity of existing medical TKGs, the limited expressiveness of their topological structures, and the lack of comprehensive evaluations of current retrievers for medical TKGs. To address these challenges, we first develop a dataset for LLMs Complex Reasoning over medical Textual Knowledge Graphs (RiTeK), covering a broad range of topological structures. Specifically, we synthesize realistic user queries integrating diverse topological structures, relational information, and complex textual descriptions. We conduct a rigorous medical expert evaluation process to assess and validate the quality of our synthesized queries. RiTeK also serves as a comprehensive benchmark dataset for evaluating the capabilities of retrieval systems built upon LLMs. By assessing 11 representative retrievers on this benchmark, we observe that existing methods struggle to perform well, revealing notable limitations in current LLM-driven retrieval approaches. These findings highlight the pressing need for more effective retrieval systems tailored for semi-structured data in the medical domain.

Dongning Rao, Zhihua Liang, Zhihua Jiang

Empathy is key to many professions. In recognition of this, the workshops on computational approaches to subjectivity, sentiment, and social media analysis (WASSA) hosted competitions to evaluate empathy in dialogue. While fine-tuning has proved successful in the competition, there are at least three shortcomings. First, novel metrics for empathy are absent. Second, classical dialogue evaluation metrics require further investigation. Third, the ensemble’s potential remained underdeveloped. To address these issues, we propose the EMPATH framework, which combines fine-tuned models, large language models, classical dialogue evaluation metrics, and a novel metric. The novel metric, ED, encourages the response’s emotional tone to be contextually appropriate. E.g., if the user expresses joy, a cheerful reaction should receive a higher ranking. Furthermore, we introduce a new robust and label-free ensemble strategy, HO, which integrates sub-metrics with the lowest correlation coefficient first. In addition to evaluating on the WASSA benchmark, we test EMPATH’s generalizability using the EmpatheticExchanges dataset (EX). Our experiment results demonstrate that EMPATH yields the best results on the competition dataset, and ablation studies validate our component selection. On EX, the Pearson correlation coefficient for the winner of WASSA 2024 is 0.4066, while EMPATH shows a statistically significant 8% improvement (i.e., 0.4860).

Mingchen Li, Jiatan Huang, Zonghai Yao, Hong yu

Large language models (LLMs) hold significant promise for healthcare, yet their reliability in high-stakes clinical settings is often compromised by hallucinations and a lack of granular medical context. While Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) can mitigate these issues, standard supervised pipelines require computationally intensive searches over massive external knowledge bases, leading to high latency that is impractical for time-sensitive care. To address this, we introduce Keys-to-Knowledge (K2K), a novel framework that replaces external retrieval with internal, key-based knowledge access. By encoding essential clinical information directly into the model’s parameter space, K2K enables rapid retrieval from internal key–value memory without inference-time overhead. We further enhance retrieval quality through activation-guided probe construction and cross-attention reranking. Experimental results demonstrate that K2K achieves state-of-the-art performance across four benchmark healthcare outcome prediction datasets.

Parth Bhalerao, Oana Ignat, Brian Trinh, Mounika Yalamarty

Text-to-image generation models have achieved strong performance in culturally homogeneous settings, yet their ability to generate multicultural scenes—where people and landmarks originate from different cultures—remains largely unexplored. We introduce multicultural text-to-image generation as a new task and present the first benchmark designed to study this setting. Our dataset contains 9,000 images spanning five countries, three age groups, two genders, 25 historical landmarks, and five languages. Using this benchmark, we analyze the behavior of state-of-the-art text-to-image models across multiple dimensions, including alignment, image quality, aesthetics, knowledge, and fairness. As one strategy for composing cultural and demographic information, we explore MosAIG, a Multi-Agent framework that enhances multicultural image generation by leveraging large language models with distinct cultural personas. Our analysis shows that richer prompt composition can improve image quality and cultural grounding compared to simple prompts, while also revealing substantial disparities across languages and demographic groups. We release our dataset and code at https://github.com/AIM-SCU/MosAIG

Sama Hadhoud, Alaa Elsetohy, Frederikus Hudi, Jan Christian Blaise Cruz, Steven Halim, Alham Fikri Aji

Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly succeed on competitive programming problems, yet existing evaluations conflate algorithmic reasoning with code-level implementation. We argue that competitive programming is fundamentally a problem-solving task and propose centering natural-language editorials in both solution generation and evaluation. Generating an editorial prior to code improves solve rates for some LLMs, with substantially larger gains when using expertly written gold editorials. However, even with gold editorials, models continue to struggle with implementation, while the gap between generated and gold editorials reveals a persistent problem-solving bottleneck in specifying correct and complete algorithms. Beyond pass/fail metrics, we diagnose reasoning errors by comparing model-generated editorials to gold standards using expert annotations and validate an LLM-as-a-judge protocol for scalable evaluation. We introduce a dataset of 83 ICPC-style problems with gold editorials and full test suites, and evaluate 19 LLMs, arguing that future benchmarks should explicitly separate problem solving from implementation.

Jieyi Wang, Yazhe Niu, Dexuan Xu, Zhongyu Wei

Recent Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) have shown strong capabilities in audio understanding, yet their reasoning remains vulnerable to perceptual errors, especially in noisy and multi-speaker environments. We argue that reliable audio reasoning requires first grounding model’s perception in structured auditory scenes. Motivated by Auditory Scene Analysis, we introduce **PAQA**, a large-scale dataset for **Perception-Aware Question Answering** covering over 300 categories. PAQA adopts a hierarchical decoupling strategy that separates speech from environmental sounds and distinguishes among multiple speakers, providing explicit perceptual supervision for audio reasoning. Building on this, we propose **HyPeR**, a two-stage **Hybrid Perception-Reasoning** framework for perception-grounded audio understanding. In Stage I, the model is fine-tuned on PAQA for cold start to improve perception of acoustic attributes in complex auditory scenes. In Stage II, we further refine its internal reasoning via **Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO)**. To support deliberation under acoustic ambiguity, we introduce **PAUSE tokens** for latent computation and a **Perceptual Consistency Reward** to align reasoning rationales with the underlying audio evidence. Extensive ablation studies isolate the effects of the perception-attention mechanism, self-correction module, and pause-based reasoning strategy. Experiments on multiple benchmarks show that HyPeR consistently improves over the base model, including on MMAU-mini (+13.1%), MMAR (+25.5%), and PAQA (+28.2%), while achieving performance comparable to much larger models. Additional analyses of inference latency and computational overhead show that these gains come with acceptable efficiency trade-offs. Overall, our results demonstrate the effectiveness of hybrid perception-grounded reasoning for robust audio understanding.

Drishti Goel, Jeongah Lee, Qiuyue Zhong, Violeta J. Rodriguez, Daniel S. Brown, Ravi Karkar, Dong Whi Yoo, Koustuv Saha

Caregivers seeking AI-mediated support express complex needs—information-seeking, emotional validation, and distress cues—that warrant careful evaluation of response safety and appropriateness. Existing AI evaluation frameworks, primarily focused on general risks (toxicity, hallucinations, policy violations, etc) may not adequately capture the nuanced risks of LLM-responses in caregiving-contexts. We introduce RubRIX (Rubric-based Risk Index), a theory-driven, clinician-validated framework for evaluating risks in LLM caregiving responses. Grounded in the Elements of an Ethic of Care, RubRIX operationalizes five empirically-derived risk dimensions: Inattention, Bias Stigma, Information Inaccuracy, Uncritical Affirmation, and Epistemic Arrogance. We evaluate six state-of-the-art LLMs on over 20,000 caregiver queries from Reddit and ALZConnected. Rubric-guided refinement consistently reduced risk-components by 45-98% after one iteration across models. This work contributes a methodological approach for developing domain-sensitive, user-centered evaluation frameworks for high-burden contexts. Our findings highlight the importance of domain-sensitive, interactional risk evaluation for the responsible deployment of LLMs in caregiving support contexts. We release benchmark datasets to enable future research on contextual risk evaluation in AI-mediated support.

Rafał Poświata, Sławomir Dadas, Michał Wiktor Perełkiewicz

In this paper, we introduce the Polish Massive Text Embedding Benchmark (PL-MTEB), a comprehensive benchmark for text embeddings in the Polish language. PL-MTEB comprises 30 diverse NLP tasks across five categories: classification, clustering, pair classification, information retrieval, and semantic text similarity. Within the scope of this work, we added 12 new Polish-language tasks to MTEB based on existing datasets and prepared two new datasets used to create four clustering tasks. We evaluated 30 publicly available text embedding models, including Polish and multilingual models. We analyzed the results in detail for specific task types and model sizes. We made the prepared datasets, the source code for evaluation, and the obtained results available to the public at https://github.com/rafalposwiata/pl-mteb.

Sraavya Sambara, Yuan Pu, Ayman Ali, Vishala Mishra, Lionel Wong, Monica Agrawal

Real-world health questions from patients often unintentionally embed false assumptions or premises. In such cases, safe medical communication typically involves redirection: addressing the implicit misconception and then responding to the underlying patient context, rather than the original question. While large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being used by lay users for medical advice, they have not yet been tested for this crucial competency. Therefore, in this work, we investigate how LLMs react to false premises embedded within real-world health questions. We develop a semi-automated pipeline to curate MedRedFlag, a dataset of 1100+ questions sourced from Reddit that require redirection. We then systematically compare responses from state-of-the-art LLMs to those from clinicians. Our analysis reveals that LLMs often fail to redirect problematic questions, even when the problematic premise is detected, and provide answers that could lead to suboptimal medical decision making. Our benchmark and results reveal a novel and substantial gap in how LLMs perform under the conditions of real-world health communication, highlighting critical safety concerns for patient-facing medical AI systems. Code and data are available at https://github.com/srsambara-1/MedRedFlag.

Azher Ahmed Efat, Seok Hwan Song, Wallapak Tavanapong

Charts are widely used to present complex information. Deriving meaningful insights in real-world contexts often requires interpreting multiple related charts together. Research on understanding multi-chart images has not been extensively explored. We introduce PolyChartQA, a mid-scale dataset specifically designed for question answering over multi-chart images. PolyChartQA comprises 534 multi-chart images (with a total of 2,297 sub-charts) sourced from peer-reviewed computer science research publications and 2,694 QA pairs. We evaluate the performance of nine state-of-the-art Multimodal Language Models (MLMs) on PolyChartQA across question type, difficulty, question source, and key structural characteristics of multi-charts. Our results show a 27.4% LLM-based accuracy (L-Accuracy) drop on human-authored questions compared to MLM-generated questions, and a 5.39% L-accuracy gain with our proposed prompting method.

Syed Nazmus Sakib, Nafiul Haque, Shahrear Bin Amin, Hasan Muhammad Abdullah, Md Mehedi Hasan, Mohammad Zabed Hossain, Shifat E. Arman

Vision evaluations are typically done through multi-step processes. In most contemporary fields, experts analyze images using structured, evidence-based adaptive questioning. In plant pathology, botanists inspect leaf images, identify visual cues, infer diagnostic intent, and probe further with targeted questions that adapt to species, symptoms, and severity. This structured probing is crucial for accurate disease diagnosis and treatment formulation. Yet current vision-language models are evaluated on single-turn question answering. To address this gap, we introduce PlantInquiryVQA, a benchmark for studying multi-step, intent-driven visual reasoning in botanical diagnosis. We formalize a Chain of Inquiry framework modeling diagnostic trajectories as ordered question-answer sequences conditioned on grounded visual cues and explicit epistemic intent. We release a dataset of 24,964 expert-curated plant images and 138,078 question-answer pairs annotated with visual grounding, severity labels, and domain-specific reasoning templates. Evaluations on top-tier Multimodal Large Language Models reveal that while they describe visual symptoms adequately, they struggle with safe clinical reasoning and accurate diagnosis. Importantly, structured question-guided inquiry significantly improves diagnostic correctness, reduces hallucination, and increases reasoning efficiency. PlantInquiryVQA provides a foundation for training diagnostic agents that reason like expert botanists rather than static classifiers.

Mohd Mujtaba Akhtar, Girish, Muskaan Singh

In this study, we present Healthcare Codec-Fake Detection (HCFD), a new task for detecting codec-fakes under pathological speech conditions. We intentionally focus on codec based synthetic speech in this work, since neural codec decoding forms a core building block in modern speech generation pipelines. First, we release Healthcare CodecFake, the first pathology-aware dataset containing paired real and NAC-synthesized speech across multiple clinical conditions and codec families. Our evaluations show that SOTA codec-fake detectors trained primarily on healthy speech perform poorly on Healthcare CodecFake, highlighting the need for HCFD-specific models. Second, we demonstrate that PaSST outperforms existing speech-based models for HCFD, benefiting from its patch-based spectro-temporal representation. Finally, we propose PHOENIX-Mamba, a geometry-aware framework that models codec-fakes as multiple self-discovered modes in hyperbolic space and achieves the strongest performance on HCFD across clinical conditions and codecs. Experiments on HCFK show that PHOENIX-Mamba (PaSST) achieves the best overall performance, reaching 97.04 Acc on E-Dep, 96.73 on E-Alz, and 96.57 on E-Dys, while maintaining strong results on Chinese with 94.41 (Dep), 94.40 (Alz), and 93.20 (Dys). This geometry-aware formulation enables self-discovered clustering of heterogeneous codec-fake modes in hyperbolic space, facilitating robust discrimination under pathological speech variability. PHOENIX-Mamba achieves topmost performance on the HCFD task across clinical conditions and codecs.

Alfonso Manuel Paredes Umeres, Marco Antonio Sobrevilla Cabezudo

We present PictoEduca, the first large-scale Spanish text-to-pictogram dataset for augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), derived from primary educational materials and grounded in the ARASAAC pictogram repository. The dataset is released with a reproducible pipeline that combines automatic annotation with targeted expert correction, supporting scalable and high-quality corpus construction. We benchmark a rule-based system (ARAWORD) and neural models (T5, LLaMA) under direct text-to-pictogram and two-stage text-to-concept-to-pictogram settings. Results show that the rule-based system remains a strong baseline, while neural models benefit from explicit semantic abstraction, with the two-stage approach improving semantic coherence and reducing ambiguity. We further explore data selection strategies, demonstrating that combining domain similarity with a quality signal yields higher-quality silver data, reduces annotation effort, and improves model performance in low-resource regimes. PictoEduca enables reproducible evaluation and advances Spanish text-to-pictogram research.

Hoang-Chau Luong, Lingwei Chen

Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) is widely used for parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large language models, but it is notably ineffective at removing backdoor behaviors from poisoned pretrained models when fine-tuning on clean dataset. Contrary to the common belief that this weakness is caused primarily by low rank, we show that LoRA’s vulnerability is fundamentally spectral. Our analysis identifies two key factors: LoRA updates (i) possess insufficient spectral strength, with singular values far below those of pretrained weights, and (ii) exhibit unfavorable spectral alignment, weakly matching clean-task directions while retaining overlap with trigger-sensitive subspaces. We further establish a critical scaling threshold beyond which LoRA can theoretically suppress trigger-induced activations, and we show empirically that standard LoRA rarely reaches this regime. We introduce Regularized Low-Rank Adaptation (RoRA), which improves forgetting by increasing spectral strength and correcting alignment through clean-strengthened regularization, trigger-insensitive constraints, and post-training spectral rescaling. Experiments across multiple NLP benchmarks and attack settings show that RoRA substantially reduces attack success rates while maintaining clean accuracy.

Zhenghao Zhu, Yuanfeng Song, Xing Chen, Chengzhong Liu, Cui Yakun, Caleb Chen Cao, Sirui Han, Yike Guo

Data analysis has become an indispensable part of scientific research. To discover the latent knowledge and insights hidden within massive datasets, we need to perform deep exploratory analysis to realize their full value. With the advent of large language models (LLMs) and multi-agent systems, more and more researchers are making use of these technologies for insight discovery. However, there are few benchmarks for evaluating insight discovery capabilities. As one of the most comprehensive existing frameworks, InsightBench also suffers from many critical flaws: format inconsistencies, poorly conceived objectives, and redundant insights. These issues may significantly affect the quality of data and the evaluation of agents. To address these issues, we thoroughly investigate shortcomings in InsightBench and propose essential criteria for a high-quality insight benchmark. Regarding this, we develop a data-curation pipeline to construct a new dataset named InsightEval. We further introduce a novel metric to measure the exploratory performance of agents. Through extensive experiments on InsightEval, we highlight prevailing challenges in automated insight discovery and raise some key findings to guide future research in this promising direction.

Tianning Chai, Chancharik Mitra, Brandon Huang, Gautam Rajendrakumar Gare, Zhiqiu Lin, Assaf Arbelle, Leonid Karlinsky, Rogerio Feris, Trevor Darrell, Deva Ramanan 等

Aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) to human preferences is crucial for improving their real-world behavior. A common approach is to use reward models that enable reinforcement-learning post-training. However, traditional reward modeling requires finetuning on large preference datasets, limiting adaptability to new preferences. We introduce Activation Reward Models (Activation RMs)—the first mechanistic interpretability approach that steers LLM activations to align with few-shot preference data without finetuning. Our method combines activation denoising and output token likelihood scoring, achieving state-of-the-art performance on standard reward modeling benchmarks, surpassing zero-shot, few-shot, and voting-based baselines. We further demonstrate that Activation RMs mitigate reward hacking behaviors and remain robust to noisy exemplars and spurious reward signals. To evaluate this, we propose PreferenceHack, a novel few-shot benchmark testing reward models on reward hacking in a paired preference format, where Activation RMs achieve state-of-the-art performance, surpassing GPT-4o.

Louis Estève, Christophe Servan, Thomas Lavergne, Agata Savary

Diversity has been gaining interest in the NLP community in recent years. At the same time, state-of-the-art transformer models such as ModernBERT use very large pre-training datasets, which are driven by size rather than by diversity. This summons to investigate theimpact of diversity on pre-training. We do so in this study, with the express intent of reducing pre-training dataset size, while retaining atleast comparable performance. We compare diversity-driven sampling algorithms, and we use the best one to pre-train several ModernBERT models on French with a fixed compute budget. We fine-tune and evaluate them on a variety of French benchmarks. We compare them with models pre-trained on randomly sampled data of commensurate size, with the same compute budget. We find that both random and diversity-driven sampling may reduce the pre-training dataset by up to 94% and the pre-training time by up to 73% while maintaining performance. Moreover, in some tasks, the inherent quality of models, estimated via head-only fine-tuning, is up to 10 points higher with diversity sampling than with random sampling.

Francielle Vargas, Jackson Trager, Diego Alves, Matteo Guida, Surendrabikram Thapa, Berk Atıl, Daryna Dementieva, Andrew J Smart, Ameeta Agrawal

Existing hate speech detection models are often opaque and rely on surface-level lexical cues, which makes them vulnerable to spurious correlations and limits robustness, interpretability and cultural contextualization. We propose Supervised Moral Rationale Attention (SMRA), the first self-explaining hate speech detection framework to incorporate moral rationales as direct supervision for attention alignment. Based on Moral Foundations Theory, SMRA aligns token-level attention with expert-annotated moral rationales, guiding models to attend to morally salient spans. Unlike prior rationale-supervised or post-hoc approaches, SMRA integrates moral rationale supervision directly into the training objective, producing inherently interpretable and contextualized explanations. To support our framework, we also introduce HateBRMoralXplain, a Brazilian Portuguese benchmark dataset annotated with hate labels, moral categories, token-level moral rationales, and socio-political metadata. Across binary hate speech detection and multi-label moral sentiment classification, SMRA consistently improves performance while enhancing both faithful and plausible explanations. Although explanations become more concise, sufficiency decreases, indicating more compact and informative rationales. Fairness remains stable, suggesting that improvements in explanation quality do not introduce significant bias trade-offs.

Jisu Shin, Hoyun Song, Juhyun Oh, Changgeon Ko, Eunsu Kim, Chani Jung, Alice Oh

People often encounter role conflicts—social dilemmas where the expectations of multiple roles clash and cannot be simultaneously fulfilled. As large language models (LLMs) increasingly navigate these social dynamics, a critical research question emerges. When faced with such dilemmas, do LLMs prioritize dynamic contextual cues or the learned preferences? To address this, we introduce RoleConflictBench, a novel benchmark designed to measure the contextual sensitivity of LLMs in role conflict scenarios. To enable objective evaluation within this subjective domain, we employ situational urgency as a constraint for decision-making. We construct the dataset through a three-stage pipeline that generates over 13,000 realistic scenarios across 65 roles in five social domains by systematically varying the urgency of competing situations. This controlled setup enables us to quantitatively measure contextual sensitivity, determining whether model decisions align with the situational contexts or are overridden by the learned role preferences. Our analysis of 10 LLMs reveals that models substantially deviate from this objective baseline. Instead of responding to dynamic contextual cues, their decisions are predominantly governed by the preferences toward specific social roles.

Yanshan Liu, Hongbo Zhang, Zhen Sun, Jiaheng Wei, Kaishun Wu

In complex domains like interior design, user requests are often ambiguous and multimodal. Professional designers address this by asking strategic clarification questions based on hierarchical priorities, a capability lacking in current Vision-Language Models (VLMs). When fine-tuned on dialogue data, existing models often exhibit modality forgetting, overfitting to textual patterns while neglecting visual cues and thus producing hallucinated or visually irrelevant questions. To bridge this gap, we introduce VIDA (Visual Intent-driven Design Assistant), an assistant designed to generate proactive, visually grounded, and strategically prioritized clarification questions. Instead of standard fine-tuning, we propose a strategy-aware alignment framework that evolves from imitation learning to value-driven reinforcement. We utilize Group Sequence Policy Optimization to strictly enforce expert protocols, ensuring the model not only mimics fluent speech but also adheres to optimal inquiry strategies. Crucially, we design a novel hierarchical reward mechanism with Dynamic Intent Binding to align the assistant with professional prioritization standards. To facilitate this research, we construct and release InteriorClarify, a multimodal benchmark dataset comprising 1,016 real-world consultation cases annotated with this three-tier intent hierarchy. Extensive experiments demonstrate that VIDA sets a new state-of-the-art, improving the Strategic Alignment Score (SAS) by 20.59% over SFT baselines and effectively restoring visual grounding capabilities lost during standard fine-tuning.