论文检索

Christopher Adrian Kusuma, Muhammad Reza Qorib, Hwee Tou Ng

Large language models (LLMs) are highly capable of answering questions, but they are often unaware of their own knowledge boundary, i.e., knowing what they know and what they don’t know. As a result, they can generate factually incorrect responses on topics they do not have enough knowledge of, commonly known as hallucination. Rather than hallucinating, a language model should be more honest and respond with "I don’t know" when it does not have enough knowledge about a topic. Many methods have been proposed to improve LLM honesty, but their evaluations lack robustness, as they do not take into account the knowledge that the LLM has ingested during its pretraining. In this paper, we propose a more robust evaluation benchmark dataset for LLM honesty by utilizing Pythia, a truly open LLM with publicly available pretraining data. In addition, we also propose a novel method for harnessing the pretraining data to build a more honest LLM.

Savita Bhat, Vasudeva Varma

LLM-based evaluation systems (LLM judges) have emerged as a scalable alternative to expensive human evaluations. Although LLM judges demonstrate 70-80% agreement with human evaluators, their robustness under semantically equivalent prompt variations remains underexplored. Through systematic evaluation of 8 models across 4 NLG tasks using 10 semantically equivalent paraphrases per prompt (~115000 evaluations), we identify a critical accuracy-robustness gap: attribute verifiability affects the robustness more than model choice, with factually verifiable attributes achieving 0.71 accuracy versus 0.19 for subjective attributes. Our investigations discover three key insights: 1) Task structure characteristics influence the robustness and in turn accuracy, 2) Attribute verifiability as the strongest predictor-factually verifiable attribute achieve 0.71 accuracy versus 0.19 for subjective attributes, 3) No single winning model-smallest model (Llama-3.1-8B) exhibits second-best performance, while the strongest model (Llama-4) from the same family significantly lag behind, thus demonstrating that general capability improvements do not necessarily result in evaluation robustness. With these findings, we propose a diagnostic framework grounded in attribute verifiability that enables principled decisions about evaluation automation. Our work establishes new standards for assessing LLM judge reliability beyond simple accuracy metrics.

Guanghao Jin, Jingpei Wu, Tianpei Guo, Yiyi Niu, Weidong Zhou, Linyi Yang, Guoyang Liu

While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated the capacity for multi-modal reasoning, current Referring Expression Comprehension (REC) benchmarks lag behind, predominantly relying on intra-image cues and neglecting the integration of external world knowledge, which significantly impedes the evolution of REC towards real-world applications. This limitation obscures a model’s true capability to conduct textual reasoning (entity resolution), resolve spatial location (visual grounding), and verify reference validity (hallucination rejection). To address this, we introduce KnowDR-REC, a targeted audit benchmark comprising 1,042 positive triplets derived from real-world knowledge, along with rigorously matched negative samples. Unlike traditional datasets, we implement a controllable counterfactual evaluation mechanism that subjects textual expressions to single-factor perturbations (entity, relation, or time) to test sensitivity to fine-grained factual changes. Extensive evaluation of 18 state-of-the-art LMMs exposes a critical “binding hallucination,” revealing that current high performance is often built on fragile visual shortcuts rather than true understanding. KnowDR-REC thus serves as a pivotal diagnostic instrument, steering future research toward the genuine integration of perception and reasoning.

Cennet Oguz, Yasser Hamidullah, Josef van Genabith, Simon Ostermann

Evaluating factual correctness in procedural video captions is challenging because captions must reflect both the abstract procedural roles (e.g., actions, ingredients, tools, locations) and their visual execution. Existing evaluation metrics, which rely on lexical overlap or holistic semantic similarity, often miss role-specific omissions and misclassify visually present but task-irrelevant content as hallucinations. We introduce DualFact+, a role-aware, fact-level evaluation framework that distinguishes conceptual facts, encoding ontology-based role typing of procedural steps (Action, Object or Ingredient, Tool, Location), from contextual facts, encoding video-grounded predicate–argument relations that specify how these roles are instantiated during execution. To enable complete and role-consistent evaluation, DualFact+ incorporates visually grounded implicit arguments and contrastive fact sets, and operates in two complementary modes: DualFact-C for text-based verification and DualFact-V for video-grounded verification. Experiments on YouCook3-Fact and CraftBench-Fact show that state-of-the-art captioning models produce fluent but often incomplete descriptions with systematic role-level errors. DualFact+ achieves stronger correlation with human factuality judgments than standard lexical and embedding-based metrics, highlighting the importance of role-aware evaluation for procedural video understanding.

Zhenghai Chen, Senbin Xu, Jiaxi Tan, Xinhua Wu, Yan Zhang, Xiawu Zheng, Shengchuan Zhang, Ke Li, Sicheng Zhao, Liujuan Cao 等

Factual knowledge stored in Large Language Models (LLMs) inevitably becomes outdated or erroneous over time, making it critical to update these models without incurring the high cost of retraining. Existing sequential knowledge editing methods predominantly rely on strict orthogonal projection to preserve previously edited knowledge. However, this excessive constraint limits gradient expressiveness, resulting in a significant degradation of model generalization and overall performance as the number of edits increases. To address this challenge, we propose Dual-Importance Projection Editing (DipEdit). This method leverages Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to identify critical gradient subspaces and introduces a dual mechanism comprising "accumulated importance" and "projection importance." Unlike traditional approaches that enforce strict orthogonality, DipEdit dynamically scales gradient components parallel to key subspaces based on their projection importance rather than discarding them directly. This approach enhances the model’s adaptability to new knowledge while maximally preserving historical knowledge. Extensive experiments conducted on five mainstream LLMs using the ZsRE and Counterfact datasets demonstrate that DipEdit effectively handles thousands of sequential edits. The proposed method achieves an average comprehensive performance improvement of 10.36% and effectively maintains the model’s general capabilities on downstream tasks. Code is available at: https://github.com/czhhhla/DipEdit.

Yehonatan Peisakhovsky, Zorik Gekhman, Yosi Mass, Liat Ein-Dor, Roi Reichart

Context-grounded hallucinations are cases where model outputs contain information not verifiable against the source text. We study the applicability of LLMs for localizing such hallucinations, as a more practical alternative to existing complex evaluation pipelines. In the absence of established benchmarks for meta-evaluation of hallucinations localization, we construct one tailored to LLMs, involving a challenging human annotation of over 1,000 examples. We complement the benchmark with an LLM-based evaluation protocol, verifying its quality in a human evaluation. Since existing representations of hallucinations limit the types of errors that can be expressed, we propose a new representation based on free-form textual descriptions, capturing the full range of possible errors. We conduct a comprehensive study, evaluating four large-scale LLMs, which highlights the benchmark’s difficulty, as the best model achieves an F1 score of only 0.67. Through careful analysis, we offer insights into optimal prompting strategies for the task and identify the main factors that make it challenging for LLMs: (1) a tendency to incorrectly flag missing details as inconsistent, despite being instructed to check only facts in the output; and (2) difficulty with outputs containing factually correct information absent from the source - and thus not verifiable - due to alignment with the model’s parametric knowledge.

Wenxuan Xie, Xuhong Wang

The integration of extensive, dynamic knowledge into Large Language Models (LLMs) remains a significant challenge due to the inherent entanglement of factual data and reasoning patterns. Existing solutions, ranging from non-parametric Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to parametric knowledge editing, are often constrained in practice by finite context windows, retriever noise, or the risk of catastrophic forgetting. In this paper, we propose DRIFT, a novel dual-model architecture designed to explicitly decouple knowledge extraction from the reasoning process. Unlike static prompt compression, DRIFT employs a lightweight knowledge model to dynamically compress document chunks into implicit fact tokens conditioned on the query. These dense representations are projected into the reasoning model’s embedding space, replacing raw, redundant text while maintaining inference accuracy. Extensive experiments show that DRIFT significantly improves performance on long-context tasks, outperforming strong baselines among comparably sized models. Our approach provides a scalable and efficient paradigm for extending the effective context window and reasoning capabilities of LLMs. Our code and data will be made public upon publication.

Wenhao Yu, Zhicong Lu, Bo Lv, Fangyin Ma, Kaiwen Wei, Shihao Yang, Nayu Liu

Knowledge editing aims to efficiently update factual information in Large Language Models (LLMs) without full retraining. However, existing methods still suffer from performance degradation in batch knowledge editing. We identify that semantic representation entanglement, such as overlapping concepts and shared syntactic patterns, accumulates interference in the representation space and reduces editing precision. To bridge this gap, in this paper, we propose Orthogonal Representation Editing (ORE), which performs edits in the hidden representation space of LLMs by constructing a general semantic subspace and enforcing orthogonal constraints on edit vectors, effectively decoupling semantic entanglement. Furthermore, we introduce a gated non-linear representation head to enable adaptive learning of editing locations and precise control over knowledge injection. Extensive experiments show that ORE outperforms existing methods and achieves superior performance in cross-lingual knowledge editing scenarios. We release our code at https://github.com/YVVH/ORE.

Dhruv Madhwal, Lyuxin David Zhang, Dan Roth, Tomer Wolfson, Vivek Gupta

Large language models often struggle to recognize their knowledge limits in closed-book question answering, leading to confident hallucinations. While decomposed prompting is typically used to improve accuracy, we investigate its impact on reliability. We evaluate three task-equivalent prompting regimes: Direct, Assistive, and Incremental, across different model scales and multi-hop QA benchmarks. We find that although accuracy gains from decomposition diminish in frontier models, disagreements between prompting regimes remain highly indicative of potential errors. Because factual knowledge is typically stable while hallucinations are stochastic, cross-regime agreement provides a precise signal of internal uncertainty. We leverage this signal to implement a training-free abstention policy that requires no retrieval or fine-tuning. Our results show that disagreement-based abstention outperforms standard uncertainty baselines as an error detector, improving both F1 and AUROC across settings. This demonstrates that decomposition-based prompting can serve as a practical diagnostic probe for model reliability in closed-book QA.

Mingkuan Zhao, Yide Gao, Wentao Hu, Suquan Chen, Tianchen Huang, Zhenhua An, Zetao Chang, Xiayu Sun, Yuheng Min

Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently exhibit “contextual disregard” when faced with input evidence that conflicts with their internal parametric memory, leading to persistent factual hallucinations. Existing mitigation strategies primarily rely on suppressing specific neuron activations or employing computationally expensive contrastive decoding mechanisms, which often result in increased perplexity or significantly elevated inference latency. To address these limitations, we propose Resonant Context Anchoring (RCA), a lightweight inference-time intervention method grounded in the perspective of residual stream signal dynamics. RCA aims to resolve the signal attenuation of external evidence during its propagation through deep networks. The core mechanism involves the orthogonal decoupling of routing logic and information magnitude within the self-attention module. By utilizing raw pre-softmax attention scores as an instantaneous metric of semantic alignment, we construct a dynamic gain field via non-linear rectification to selectively amplify the norms of value vectors corresponding to context tokens, without altering the attention probability distribution. This mechanism effectively elevates the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of input evidence within the residual stream mixture, thereby robustly anchoring the generation trajectory to the truthful context during inference. Extensive experiments on the Llama-3 model series demonstrate that RCA significantly improves contextual faithfulness across multiple factual consistency and strong knowledge-conflict tasks, effectively suppressing parametric hallucinations. Furthermore, results confirm that as a training-free and computationally negligible plug-and-play module, RCA achieves a Pareto improvement in faithfulness and fluency while maintaining the model’s general language understanding capabilities. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/RCA-Implementation-D8B5

Xueren Ge, Sahil Murtaza, Anthony Cortez, Homa Alemzadeh

Conversational diagnosis prediction requires models to track evolving evidence in streaming clinical conversations and decide when to commit to a diagnosis. Existing medical dialogue corpora are largely dyadic or lack the multi-party workflow and annotations needed for this setting. We introduce an ePCR-grounded, topic-flow-based multi-agent generation pipeline that iteratively plans, generates, and self-refines dialogues with rule-based factual and topic flow checks. The pipeline yields EMSDialog, a dataset of 4,414 synthetic multi-speaker EMS conversations based on a real-world ePCR dataset, annotated with 43 diagnoses, speaker roles, and turn-level topics. Human and LLM evaluations confirm high quality and realism of EMSDialog using both utterance- and conversation-level metrics. Results show that EMSDialog-augmented training improves accuracy, timeliness, and stability of EMS conversational diagnosis prediction. Our datasets and code are publicly available at https://uva-dsa.github.io/EMSDialog

Tejal Nair, Mahmud Wasif Nafee, Maiqi Jiang, Ashley Gao, Haipeng Chen, Yanfu Zhang

Although large language models (LLMs) excel at factual recall, they can still propagate stale or incorrect knowledge, making in-context knowledge editing a gradient-free remedy suitable for black-box APIs. These knowledge editors that use in-context learning typically rely on a single retriever and surface-similarity heuristics to build prompts. However, a key observation in this study is that retrievers can be complementary: semantic rankers may recover paraphrased evidence, while lexical or feature-based retrievers may preserve precise entities and cues. This creates two gaps in single-retriever editors: they (i) miss complementary evidence that different retrievers surface and (ii) cannot adapt when one retriever is clearly more reliable for a query. We introduce a Feature-Weighted Ensemble for In-context Knowledge Editing (FWE-IKE) that calibrates three heterogeneous rankers (LLM-, BERT-, and MLP-based), extracts simple confidence features from each ranker, predicts per-query mixture weights, and applies a conservative margin-based routing gate that selects a single expert when confident; otherwise we mix calibrated distributions with learned per-query weights. On the CounterFact benchmark, FWE-IKE attains 88.33% Edit-Success Rate, a +3.0 point gain over the best single retriever and approaching the oracle upper bound (91%). Case studies, an ablation study, and analyses show the method systematically recovers complementary wins (e.g., BERT-only, LLM-only, MLP-only slices). FWE-IKE improves edit accuracy without touching model weights and provides a practical path to more robust, confidence-aware retrieval for IKE.

Adam Dejl, James Barry, Alessandra Pascale, Javier Carnerero-Cano

Despite demonstrating remarkable performance across a wide range of tasks, large language models (LLMs) have also been found to frequently produce outputs that are incomplete or selectively omit key information. In sensitive domains, such omissions can result in significant harm comparable to that posed by factual inaccuracies, including hallucinations. In this study, we address the challenge of evaluating the comprehensiveness of LLM-generated texts, focusing on the detection of missing information or underrepresented viewpoints. We investigate three automated evaluation metrics: (1) an NLI-based method that decomposes texts into atomic statements and uses natural language inference (NLI) to identify missing facts, (2) a Q A-based metric that extracts question-answer pairs and compares responses across sources, and (3) an end-to-end approach that directly identifies missing content using LLMs. Our experiments demonstrate the surprising effectiveness of the simple end-to-end metric compared to more complex metrics, though at the cost of reduced robustness, interpretability and result granularity. We further assess the comprehensiveness of responses from several popular open-weight LLMs when answering user queries based on multiple sources.

Wenxuan Wang, Yuk-Kit Chan, Zixuan Ling, Shi Juluan, Youliang Yuan, Jen-tse Huang, Yifei Zhang, Wenxiang Jiao, Zhaopeng Tu, Michael R. Lyu

Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT are foundational in various applications due to their extensive knowledge from pre-training and fine-tuning. Despite this, they are prone to generating factual and commonsense errors, raising concerns in critical areas like healthcare, journalism, and education to mislead users. Current methods for evaluating LLMs’ veracity are limited by the need for extensive human labor, test data contamination, or limited scope, hindering efficient and effective exposure of errors. To address these challenges, we propose HalluHunter, a novel, fully automated framework for systematically uncovering factual inaccuracies in LLMs. HalluHunter employs a knowledge-graph-based approach, extracting fact triplets to generate diverse question types for single- and multi-hop reasoning using rule-based Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques. Its iterative process starts with random triplet selection for question generation, followed by adaptive selection in subsequent iterations, targeting triplets where LLMs frequently err based on their performance analysis. Our extensive tests on nine prominent LLMs reveal that HalluHunter can trigger factual errors in up to 55% of questions in these models. Moreover, we demonstrate that HalluHunter’s test cases, particularly in adaptive selection, could further expose the weaknesses in benchmarking the factuality in LLMs meanwhile maintaining the coverage of questions. All code, data, and results will be released for future research.

Tianhao Wu, Siqiang Luo

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a core technique for improving the factuality and reasoning ability of large language models. Recent efforts extend RAG with graph-structured knowledge, enhancing retrieval to capture relational context beyond isolated text chunks. However, many graph-based RAG systems rely on a two-stage pipeline: (i) classical approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) search to identify top-k entities in the embedding space, (ii) heuristic neighbor expansion which augments the retrieved set by traversing immediate neighbors. This design underutilizes graph topology during retrieval and often introduces noisy or high-degree neighbors, leading to suboptimal evidence selection. In this paper, we propose TopoRAG, a retrieval framework that directly integrates structural constraints into ANN search via a diameter-constrained formulation. By selecting entities whose induced subgraph satisfies a diameter bound, TopoRAG enables topology-aware and noise-controlled graph retrieval. Experiments show that our approach consistently improves precision and significantly reduces context redundancy compared to existing methods.

Kaiyu He, Mian Zhang, Peilin Wu, Xinya Du, Zhiyu Chen

While Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at factual retrieval, they often struggle with the "curse of two-hop reasoning" in compositional tasks. Recent research suggests that parameter-sharing transformers can bridge this gap by forming a "Generalization Circuit" during a prolonged "grokking" phase. A fundamental question arises: Is a grokked model truly superior to its non-grokked counterparts? Furthermore, is the extensive computational cost of waiting for the grokking phase worthwhile? In this work, we conduct a mechanistic study to evaluate the Generalization Circuit’s role in knowledge assimilation and transfer. We demonstrate that: (i) The inference paths established by non-grokked and grokked models for in-distribution compositional queries are identical. This suggests that the "Generalization Circuit" does not represent the sudden acquisition of a new reasoning paradigm. Instead, we argue that grokking is the process of integrating memorized atomic facts into an easy-acquire, naturally established reasoning path. (ii) Achieving high accuracy on unseen cases after prolonged training and the formation of a certain reasoning path are not bound; they can occur independently under specific data regimes. (iii) Even a mature circuit exhibits limited transferability when integrating new knowledge, suggesting that "grokked" Transformers do not achieve a full mastery of compositional logic.

Hongzhi Zhang, Yuanze Hu, Tinghai Zhang, Jia Fu, Tao Wang, Junwei Jing, Zhaoxin Fan, Wei Bi, Ruiming Tang, Han Li 等

The evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) towards autonomous agents has catalyzed progress in Deep Research. While retrieval capabilities are well-benchmarked, the post-retrieval synthesis stage—where agents must digest massive amounts of context and consolidate fragmented evidence into coherent, long-form reports—remains under-evaluated due to the subjectivity of open-ended writing.To bridge this gap, we introduce DeepSynth-Eval, a benchmark designed to objectively evaluate information consolidation capabilities. We leverage high-quality survey papers as gold standards, reverse-engineer research requests, and construct Oracle Contexts from their bibliographies to isolate synthesis from retrieval noise. We propose a fine-grained evaluation protocol using General Checklists (for factual coverage) and Constraint Checklists (for structural organization), transforming subjective judgment into verifiable metrics. Experiments across 96 tasks reveal that synthesizing information from hundreds of references remains a significant challenge. Our results demonstrate that agentic "plan-then-write" workflows significantly outperform single-turn generation, effectively reducing hallucinations and improving adherence to complex structural constraints.

Chuan Li, Ye Lyu, Chengyu Wang, Mingyuan Fan, Cen Chen

Despite the advanced capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), training specialized reasoning models for the medical domain remains a significant challenge due to the scarcity of high-quality, large-scale Chain-of-Thought (CoT) data. Moreover, the intermediate reasoning steps in teacher-generated CoT data can be redundant and noisy, leading models to acquire spurious patterns and resulting in suboptimal performance. To address these issues, we propose MedCoach, a novel framework that introduces a dedicated coach role to guide the student model through question decomposition, thereby smoothing its learning curve in medical reasoning. The framework employs a curriculum-oriented warm-up on simplified sub-questions, facilitating domain adaptation before advancing to complex long-chain reasoning. To ensure the fidelity of the intermediate chain-of-thought signals, we augment this phase with medical knowledge graphs to suppress factual drift and mitigate reasoning noise at a granular level.Subsequently, we introduce a targeted factual perturbation mechanism to foster fine-grained discrimination between valid fact utilization and subtle factual misapplications. Extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks demonstrate notable improvements over existing methods, validating the effectiveness of MedCoach.

Zituo Li, Guangzhou Chen, Jianbin Sun, Qi Song, Yang Kewei

Hallucination detection has attracted increasing attention, particularly in long-form text generation, where language models are more prone to producing factually inaccurate content. Prior studies reveal two limitations: (1) current benchmarks focus on short-form content, lacking the structural complexity required in long-form scenarios; (2) existing methods are constrained by coarse-grained consistency checks and fail to capture long-range and hyper-relational dependencies. To address these challenges, we provide LHD, a benchmark for long-form hallucination detection that contains diverse entity types and intricate factual dependencies spanning extended contexts. We further propose HRKG-HD, a zero-resource, black-box framework that models responses as fact-centric hyper-relational knowledge graphs and detects hallucinations through relation-aware multi-hop reasoning over these graphs. By linking distant facts through shared entities and qualifiers, this design enables a global and dependency-aware verification of factual consistency. Extensive experiments demonstrate that HRKG-HD not only outperforms existing baselines but also exhibits robust and consistent performance across various LLMs.

Dylan Xinming Hou, Juntian Zhang, Xu Gu, Yichen Wu, Nils Lukas, Gus Xia, Xiuying Chen, Yuhan Liu

The evolving realism of AI-generated Videos (AIGC-V) is rapidly rendering traditional artifact-centric detection insufficient, necessitating a paradigm shift from low-level inspection to high-level semantic verification. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of AIGC-V detection, reframing the task as Factual Fidelity Verification, which asks whether the events, entities, and physical processes depicted in a video are consistent with real-world facts. To systematize this rapidly evolving field, we propose a Vision–Language Dual-View taxonomy that organizes existing methods into a hierarchical, four-layer landscape, spanning intrinsic cue analysis, spatiotemporal consistency modeling, cross-modal consistency reasoning, and language-guided world-level reasoning. This dual-view framing highlights a fundamental transition from artifact matching to evidence-based semantic verification enabled by vision–language models and agentic reasoning pipelines. Based on a systematic review of 195 papers, we synthesize AIGC-V generation paradigms, survey the landscape of detection methods, and review evaluation metrics and benchmarks in line with proposed views. Finally, we discuss current challenges and identify promising directions toward robust, explainable, and trustworthy detection.