Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for Islamic question answering, where ungrounded responses may carry serious religious consequences. Yet standard MCQ/MRC-style evaluations do not capture key real-world failure modes, notably free-form hallucinations and the ability to abstain when evidence is insufficient. To address this gap, we introduce IslamicFaithQA, a 3,810-item bilingual (Arabic/English) **generative** benchmark with atomic single-gold answers, which enables direct measurement of hallucination and abstention. We additionally developed an end-to-end grounded Islamic modeling suite consisting of *(i)* 25K Arabic text-grounded SFT reasoning pairs, *(ii)* 5K bilingual preference samples for reward-guided alignment, and *(iii)* a verse-level Qur’an retrieval corpus of \sim6k atomic *verses* (ayat). Building on these resources, we develop an agentic Quran-grounding framework (agentic RAG) that uses structured tool calls for iterative evidence seeking and answer revision. Experiments across Arabic-centric and multilingual LLMs show that retrieval improves correctness and that agentic RAG yields the largest gains beyond standard RAG, achieving state-of-the-art performance and stronger Arabic–English robustness even with a small model (i.e., Qwen3 4B). We made the datasets are publicly available (https://huggingface.co/datasets/QCRI/IslamicFaithQA).
论文检索
输入标题、作者或关键词，从 12,319 篇学术成果中精准定位
Who is the richest club in the championship? Detecting and Rewriting Underspecified Questions Improve QA Performance
PDF ↗Large language models (LLMs) perform well on well-posed questions, yet standard question-answering (QA) benchmarks remain far from solved. We argue that this gap is partly due to underspecified questions, that are queries whose interpretation cannot be uniquely determined without additional context. We introduce an LLM-based classifier to identify underspecified questions and apply it to several widely used QA datasets, finding that 16% to over 60% of benchmark questions are underspecified and that LLMs perform significantly worse on them. To isolate the effect of underspecification, we conduct a controlled rewriting experiment that serves as an upper-bound analysis, rewriting underspecified questions into fully specified variants while holding gold answers fixed. QA performance consistently improves under this setting, indicating that many apparent QA failures stem from question underspecification rather than model limitations. Our findings highlight underspecification as an important confound in QA evaluation and motivate greater attention to question clarity in benchmark design.
VecCISC: Improving Confidence-Informed Self-Consistency with Reasoning Trace Clustering and Candidate Answer Selection
PDF ↗A standard technique for scaling inference-time reasoning is Self-Consistency, whereby multiple candidate answers are sampled from an LLM and the most common answer is selected. More recently, it has been shown that weighted majority voting (e.g. Confidence-Informed Self Consistency (CISC)), which assigns a confidence value to each candidate answer and chooses the answer with the largest accumulated score, tends to be more accurate on a wide range of popular benchmarks. In practice, weighted majority voting necessitates calling a critic LLM on each candidate’s reasoning trace to produce the answer’s confidence score. This secondary series of LLM calls greatly increases the overhead and cost of weighted majority voting, despite its potential performance benefits. To reduce this expense, we propose VecCISC, a lightweight, adaptive framework that uses a measure of semantic similarity to filter reasoning traces that are semantically equivalent to others, degenerate, or hallucinated, thus decreasing the number of candidate answers that must be evaluated by the critic. To ensure adequate experimental thoroughness, we evaluated VecCISC on five challenging, widely-adopted datasets spanning the domains of mathematics, chemistry, biology, commonsense reasoning, and the humanities. Our results demonstrate that VecCISC reduces the total token usage by 47%, while maintaining or exceeding the accuracy of CISC.
Conversational Large Language Models are post-trained on language that expresses specific behavioural traits, such as curiosity, open-mindedness, and empathy, and values, such as helpfulness, harmlessness, and honesty. This is done to increase utility, ensure safety, and improve the user experience of the people interacting with the model. However, values are complex and inter-related - incorporating one can modify behaviour on another. Further, incorporating certain values can make models more addictive or sycophantic, potentially having a detrimental effect on the user interacting with it. We investigate these and other unintended effects of value incorporation into models. We fine-tune models using value subsets of existing preference datasets, measuring the effect of value induction of 15 values on safety, anthropomorphism, and various QA benchmarks. We find that i) inducing values also leads to expression of other related, and sometimes contrastive values, ii) inducing positive values increases safety, and iii) all values increase anthropomorphic language use by models, making them more validating and sycophantic.
NeoAraBERT: A Modern Foundation Model for Arabic Embeddings with Diacritics-Aware Tokenization and POS-Targeted Masking
PDF ↗We present NeoAraBERT, a state-of-the-art open-source Arabic text-embedding model built on the NeoBERT architecture. We pre-train NeoAraBERT on diverse open-source and internal datasets covering modern standard, classical, and dialectal Arabic. We guided our design choices with Arabic tailored ablation studies including text normalization, light stemming, and diacritics-aware tokenization handling. We also performed more general POS-aware token masking and learning-rate scheduling ablation studies. We benchmarked NeoAraBERT against five top-performing Arabic models on 23 tasks, including a novel synonym-based task, "Muradif", that directly assesses embedding quality with no additional fine-tuning. NeoAraBERT variants (MSA, dialectal, and mixed) rank first in 18 tasks, second in two, third in two, and fourth in one task. They show strong performance on classical and modern standard Arabic, substantial margins of improvement (>7%) in two tasks, and a +2.75% improvement on average across all tasks. Our code and links to checkpoints for our model variants are available on our website: https://acr.ps/neoarabert.
Existing audio question answering benchmarks largely emphasize sound event classification or caption-grounded queries, often enabling models to succeed through shortcut strategies, short-duration cues, lexical priors, dataset-specific biases, or even bypassing audio via metadata and captions rather than genuine reasoning Thus, we present AUDITA (Audio Understanding from Diverse Internet Trivia Authors), a large-scale, real-world benchmark to rigorously evaluate audio reasoning beyond surface-level acoustic recognition. AUDITA comprises carefully curated, human-authored trivia questions grounded in real-world audio, designed to stress robust auditory reasoning through challenging distractors and long-range temporal dependencies, using probing queries that cannot be answered from isolated text or sound cues alone. Human average accuracy of 32.13% shows both the challenge of the task while demonstrating meaningful comprehension of the audio. In stark contrast, state-of-the- art audio question answering models perform poorly, with average accuracy below 8.86%. Beyond raw accuracy, we apply Item Response Theory (IRT) to estimate latent proficiency, question difficulty, and expose systematic deficiencies of the models and data.
LLM role-playing, i.e., using large language models (LLMs) to simulate specific personas, has emerged as a key capability in various applications, such as companionship, content creation, and digital games. While current models effectively capture character tones and knowledge, simulating the inner thoughts behind their behaviors remains a non-trivial challenge. Towards cognitive simulation in LLM role-play, previous efforts have mainly suffered from two critical deficiencies: the lack of high-quality datasets with explicit reasoning traces and the absence of reliable reward signals aligned with human preferences. In this paper, we propose HER (Human Emulation Reasoning), a unified framework for cognitive-level persona simulation. HER introduces a dual-layer thinking mechanism that strictly distinguishes characters’ first-person thinking processes from LLMs’ third-person reasoning. To bridge the aforementioned gaps, we curate a reasoning-augmented role-playing dataset via a reverse engineering strategy for supervised learning, and construct human-aligned evaluation principles and preference-based reward models for role-play reinforcement learning. Leveraging these resources, we train HER models based on the Qwen3-32B backbone via a hybrid paradigm of supervised learning (SL) and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of our approach. Notably, our models significantly outperform the Qwen3-32B baseline, achieving a 30.26% on the CoSER benchmark and a 14.97% on the MiniMax Benchmark. Our datasets, evaluation principles, and trained models will be released to facilitate future research in cognitive-level LLM role-playing.
Traditional topic modeling treats each document as a single, coherent unit of topic, which can cause topic contamination when documents cover multiple topics. This becomes especially problematic when stakeholders are interested in identifying documents that focus on a specific topic. We introduce segment-based topic allocation, a novel paradigm that redefines topic assignment at the level of segments, coherent textual spans conveying distinct topical content. This granularity improves topic purity, interpretability, and applicability to multi-theme corpora such as reviews or survey responses. To support this paradigm, we construct SemEval-STM, a benchmark derived from aspect-based sentiment datasets, where segments are automatically extracted using large language models (LLMs) and post-processed with human supervision. We further propose the segment intrusion task (SIT), a novel evaluation method extending word intrusion to the span level, enabling human-centric assessment of topical coherence. Empirical results across diverse metrics and models demonstrate that SBTA significantly outperforms traditional document-based methods in clustering and interpretability. Our framework provides a practical and scalable solution for fine-grained topic analysis in heterogeneous text corpora.
MaRF: Leveraging Representation-Level Fusion of Formula Semantics for Mathematical Information Retrieval
PDF ↗Mathematical information retrieval (MIR) depends on jointly modeling natural-language context and mathematical expressions. While BERT-based dense retrievers are effective, they often dilute mathematical semantics because textual content dominates most training data and mathematical formulas differ fundamentally from natural language in structure and composition. Consequently, these models rely heavily on surrounding text, which reduces robustness in math-intensive scenarios with limited textual description. We propose MaRF, a dual-encoder representation-level fusion framework for MIR that explicitly integrates formula semantics into context-aware dense retrieval. By combining contextual and formula-specific representations, MaRF captures complementary information from both textual and symbolic views. Experiments on the ARQMath-3 benchmark demonstrate that MaRF substantially improves retrieval performance and robustness, outperforming strong baselines across MIR tasks. The source code and datasets are available at https://github.com/MLPgroup/MaRF.
Dial HEALTHDIAL for Advice: A Multilingual and Multi-Parallel Spoken Dialogue Dataset for Knowledge-Grounded Information Seeking
PDF ↗Creating spoken dialogue datasets is methodologically challenging, and these challenges are amplified when the goal is to build multilingual, multi-parallel datasets at scale. This work introduces HEALTHDIAL, a large-scale, multilingual, and multi-parallel dataset for developing and evaluating retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)–based spoken dialogue systems. The dataset comprises 6,000 information-seeking dialogues (1,500 per language) grounded in trusted content from the World Health Organization (WHO) and 163 hours of user speech recorded from native speakers of diverse dialects across four official WHO languages: Arabic, Chinese, English, and Spanish. Each speaker is annotated with demographic (e.g., gender, age) and sociolinguistic (e.g., primary language, region of origin) variables. We report benchmark results across key dialogue tasks, which reveal consistent performance disparities across languages, even among high-resource ones. To support future research, we release the dataset, a prototype system, and a toolkit for data collection and system evaluation.
Understanding climate change requires reasoning over complex causal networks. Yet, existing causal discovery datasets predominantly capture explicit, direct causal relations. We introduce ClimateCause, a manually expert-annotated dataset of higher-order causal structures from science-for-policy climate reports, including implicit and nested causality. Cause-effect expressions are normalized and disentangled into individual causal relations to facilitate graph construction, with unique annotations for cause-effect correlation, relation type, and spatiotemporal context. We further demonstrate ClimateCause’s value for quantifying readability based on the semantic complexity of causal graphs underlying a statement. Finally, large language model benchmarking on correlation inference and causal chain reasoning highlights the latter as a key challenge.
News outlets shape public opinion on a scale, which makes automated detection of political bias and factuality essential. Yet, the field still lacks unified resources, comprehensive evaluations in diverse approaches, and systematic analyzes of the representations and fusion strategies that matter the most, especially under label sparsity and dataset diversity. In addition, there is little empirical work that reports broad observation driven findings about what consistently works, what fails, and why. We address these gaps with four contributions: (i) MBFC-2025, a large-scale label set that covers ~2,600 outlets from Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC); (ii) multi-view representations for ACL-2020 ~900 outlets and MBFC-2025, spanning Alexa graphs, hyperlink graphs, LLM-derived graphs, articles, and Wikipedia descriptions; (iii) systematic evaluation and analysis of embedding views and fusion strategies, including an RL-based fusion variant; and (iv) extensive experiments that achieve state-of-the-art results on ACL-2020 and establish strong benchmarks on MBFC-2025.
Character description generation is an important capability for narrative-focused applications such as summarization, story analysis, and character-driven simulations. However, generating accurate character descriptions from long-form narratives (e.g., novels) is challenging: models must track evolving attributes (e.g., relationships and events), integrate evidence scattered across the text, and infer implicit details. Despite the success of reasoning-enabled LLMs on many benchmarks, we find that for character description generation their performance improves when built-in reasoning is disabled (i.e., an empty reasoning trace). Motivated by this, we propose a training framework that decouples reasoning from generation. Our approach, which can be applied on top of long-context LLMs or chunk-based methods, consists of a reasoning model that produces a structured QA reasoning trace and a generation model that conditions on this trace to produce the final character description. Experiments on two datasets (BookWorm and CroSS) show that QA-guided reasoning improves faithfulness, informativeness, and grounding over strong long-context baselines.
Peer review relies on substantive, evidence-based questions, yet current LLMs generate surface-level queries that perform worse than human reviewer questions in expert evaluation. To address this gap, we curate a high-quality dataset of reviewer questions from OpenReview and conduct a human preference study where expert annotators evaluate question-paper pairs across three dimensions: effort, evidence, and grounding. From these annotations, we train IntelliReward, a reward model built from a frozen autoregressive LLM with trainable multi-head transformers. Validated against expert judgments, IntelliReward predicts reviewer-question quality better than API-based SFT baselines and provides scalable evaluation. We apply Decoupled Clip and Dynamic Sampling Policy Optimization (DAPO) with IntelliReward to train IntelliAsk, a question-generation model aligned with human standards of effortful, evidence-based critique. Human evaluations show IntelliAsk generates more grounded, substantive and effortful questions than strong baselines and reduces reliance on first-page content. We also find improvements on reasoning and writing benchmarks, suggesting reviewer-question quality correlates with broader capabilities. Compared to Qwen3-32B, IntelliAsk improves MuSR (68.3 vs 64.7 Acc) and WritingBench (8.31 vs 8.07). We release our code, filtered review dataset, expert annotations, IntelliAsk and IntelliReward to support automatic evaluation of grounding, effort, and evidence in LLM-generated review questions.
Reliable financial reasoning requires knowing not only how to answer, but also when an answer cannot be justified. In real financial practice, problems often rely on implicit assumptions that are taken for granted rather than stated explicitly, causing problems to appear solvable while lacking enough information for a definite answer. We introduce RealFin, a bilingual benchmark that evaluates financial reasoning by systematically removing essential premises from exam-style questions while keeping them linguistically plausible. Based on this, we evaluate models under three formulations that test answering, recognizing missing information, and rejecting unjustified options, and find consistent performance drops when key conditions are absent. General-purpose models tend to over-commit and guess, while most finance-specialized models fail to clearly identify missing premises. These results highlight a critical gap in current evaluations and show that reliable financial models must know when a question should not be answered. The dataset and code are available athttps://github.com/insait-institute/RealFin.
ThinkLinker: From Low-Rank Interaction to Knowledge-Aware Verification for Multimodal Entity Linking
PDF ↗Recent advances in Multimodal Entity Linking (MEL) exploit textual and visual information to disambiguate mentions and align them with entities in a knowledge base. Existing methods typically design separate and complex network modules for each type of interaction among multi-granular and multimodal features, while lacking explicit modeling of the joint dependencies among these features. Moreover, most approaches rely on unidirectional retrieval-based matching and lack knowledge-driven verification, leading to unreliable disambiguation in weak-context scenarios. To address these challenges, we propose a novel two-stage MEL framework termed ThinkLinker. First, we introduce a low-rank fusion mechanism to model the joint dependencies among multi-granular and multimodal features, enabling comprehensive and explicit interactions while learning task-relevant discriminative information for candidate ranking in a lower-dimensional space. Subsequently, we develop a bidirectional retrieval-verification paradigm, where the ranked candidate entities guide an LLM-based multi-turn, dialogue-style verification process to generate mention-specific contextual augmentation. The augmented context is then adaptively fused with the original representation to further refine the linking model. Experimental results on public benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed ThinkLinker outperforms all state-of-the-art baselines. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/zhouyuanyu/ThinkLinker.
Recently, embedding resources, including models, benchmarks, and datasets, have been widely released to support a variety of languages. However, the Dutch language remains underrepresented, typically comprising only a small fraction of the published multilingual resources. To address this gap and encourage the further development of Dutch embeddings, we introduce new resources for their evaluation and generation. First, we introduce the Massive Text Embedding Benchmark for Dutch (MTEB-NL), which includes both existing Dutch datasets and newly created ones, covering a wide range of tasks. Second, we provide a training dataset compiled from available Dutch retrieval datasets, complemented with synthetic data generated by large language models to expand task coverage beyond retrieval. Finally, we release a series of E5-NL compact yet efficient embedding models that demonstrate strong performance across multiple tasks. We make our resources publicly available through the Hugging Face Hub and the MTEB package.
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) often suffer from overthinking, a phenomenon in which redundant reasoning steps are generated after a correct solution has already been reached. Existing early reasoning exit methods primarily rely on output-level heuristics or trained probing models to skip redundant reasoning steps, thereby mitigating overthinking. However, these approaches typically require additional rollout computation or externally labeled datasets. In this paper, we propose NEAT, a Neuron-based Early reAsoning exiT framework that monitors neuron-level activation dynamics to enable training-free early exits, without introducing any additional test-time computation. NEAT identifies exit-associated neurons and tracks their activation patterns during reasoning to dynamically trigger early exit or suppress reflection, thereby reducing unnecessary reasoning while preserving solution quality. Experiments on four reasoning benchmarks across six models with different scales and architectures show that, for each model, NEAT achieves an average token reduction of 22% to 28% when averaged over the four benchmarks, while maintaining accuracy.
BizCompass: Benchmarking the Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs in Business Knowledge and Applications
PDF ↗Large language models (LLMs) hold great promise for business applications, yet business analysis remains inherently complex, demanding rigorous reasoning and the integration of diverse knowledge sources. Existing benchmarks typically target narrow tasks and thus leave a fundamental question unanswered: how can LLMs be reliably applied in business, and how are these applications grounded in underlying theoretical capabilities? To address this gap, we introduce BizCompass, a benchmark explicitly designed to connect theoretical foundations with practical business knowledge and applications. At the knowledge level, BizCompass covers four core domains—finance, economics, statistics, and operations management. At the application level, it structures tasks around three representative roles: the analyst, the trader, and the consultant. This dual-axis design not only exposes performance differences across realistic scenarios but also diagnoses which foundational capabilities enable or constrain success. We systematically evaluate both open-source and commercial LLMs, revealing how theoretical knowledge translates into practical performance in business. The results provide actionable insights for model selection and training optimization in real-world business contexts. All datasets and evaluation code are publicly released to support reproducibility and future research: https://bizcompass.dev.ypemc.com.
Live-Aid: A Large-Scale Dialogue Dataset and Benchmark for Interleaved Multi-party Interactions in Live Streaming
PDF ↗Recent advancements in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved significant success in understanding static pre-recorded video scenarios (e.g., event-centric or narrative-driven content). However, existing MLLMs are largely trained on datasets restricted to static content due to the scarcity of high-quality interleaved data, causing them to struggle with dynamic interactions. Distinct from pre-recorded videos, live streaming is characterized by high-density, interleaved multimodal turns, where viewer comments (danmaku) are tightly coupled with real-time audio-visual evidence and evolving dialogue context. In such settings, purely textual annotations fail to capture fine-grained visual and temporal dependencies. To bridge this gap, we introduce **Live-Aid**, the first large-scale interleaved live interaction Chinese dataset with **human-annotated**, temporally aligned video responses, spanning over **1,100 hours** and 80,037 dialogue turns across 8,053 video sessions. Building on this, we leverage these high-quality annotations within a novel multi-agent pipeline to construct evaluation tasks targeting core capabilities of live interactions. Extensive evaluations of strong Video-LLMs and Omni-LLMs reveal critical limitations in interleaved multi-turn interactions requiring temporal reasoning, highlighting the value of **Live-Aid** in advancing interleaved multimodal reasoning and dynamic audio-visual dependencies.