论文检索

Ada Chen, Yongjiang Wu, Junyuan Zhang, Jingyu Xiao, Shu Yang, Jen-tse Huang, Kun Wang, Wenxuan Wang, Shuai Wang

Recently, AI-driven interactions with computing devices have advanced from basic prototype tools to sophisticated, LLM-based systems that emulate human-like operations in graphical user interfaces. We are now witnessing the emergence of Computer-Using Agents (CUAs), capable of autonomously performing tasks such as navigating desktop applications, web pages, and mobile apps. However, as these agents grow in capability, they also introduce novel safety and security risks. Vulnerabilities in LLM-driven reasoning, with the added complexity of integrating multiple software components and multimodal inputs, further complicate the security landscape. In this paper, we present a systematization of knowledge on the safety and security threats of CUAs. We conduct a comprehensive literature review and distill our findings along four research objectives: (i) define the CUA that suits safety analysis; (ii) categorize current safety threats among CUAs; (iii) propose a comprehensive taxonomy of existing defensive strategies; (iv) summarize prevailing benchmarks, datasets, and evaluation metrics used to assess the safety and performance of CUAs. Building on these insights, our work provides future researchers with a structured foundation for exploring unexplored vulnerabilities and offers practitioners actionable guidance in designing and deploying secure Computer-Using Agents.

Cui Yakun, Peng Qi, Fushuo Huo, Hang Du, Weijie Shi, Juntao Dai, Zhenghao Zhu, Sirui Han

The advent of multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) has greatly advanced research on video fake news detection (VFND) tasks. Existing benchmarks typically focus on the detection accuracy, while failing to provide fine-grained assessments for the entire detection process. To address these limitations, we introduce POVFNDB (Process-oriented Video Fake News Detection Benchmark), a process-oriented benchmark comprising 10 tasks designed to systematically evaluate MLLMs’ perception, understanding, and reasoning capabilities in VFND. This benchmark contains 36,240 human-annotated question-answer (QA) in structured or open-ended formats, spanning 15 distinct evaluation dimensions that characterize different aspects of the video fake news detection process.Using POVFNDB, we conduct comprehensive evaluations on both proprietary and open-source MLLMs. Moreover, We fine-tune Qwen2.5VL-7B-Instruct on a reasoning dataset generated by our proposed POVFND-CoT, a chain-of-thought method that utilizes rationales from evaluation results and rationale validation. The resulting model achieves sota performance on VFND.

Fuqiang Niu, Zini Chen, Zhiyu Xie, Hu Huang, Qing Liao, Qianlong Wang, Genan Dai, Bowen Zhang

Political user-level stance detection is vital for analyzing polarization, yet progress is hindered by the scarcity of high-quality benchmarks integrating linguistic and social signals. Existing datasets, largely relying on noisy heuristic or distant supervision, limit model robustness and generalizability. To address this, we introduce TwiUSD, a large-scale, expert-annotated benchmark for political user-level stance detection with explicit social network structure. TwiUSD comprises 16,211 users and 47,757 tweets, labeled by domain experts using a protocol that integrates both user content and followee signals, ensuring high-quality annotations (kappa > 0.9). Building upon TwiUSD, we propose MRFG, a Multi-scale Relevance Filtering and Graph-aware framework that leverages large language models to filter stance-relevant followee content and adaptively routes features based on structural informativeness. This design enables robust stance prediction by jointly modeling semantic and relational cues. Extensive experiments show that MRFG significantly outperforms strong baselines, highlighting the importance of relevance filtering and structure-aware modeling.

Ziyu Chen, Yilun Zhao, Chengye Wang, Rilyn R. Han, Manasi Patwardhan, Arman Cohan

Constructing scientific multimodal document reasoning datasets for foundation model training involves an inherent trade-off among scale, faithfulness, and realism. To address this challenge, we introduce the synthesize-and-reground framework, a two-stage pipeline comprising: (1) Claim-Centric QA Synthesis, which generates faithful, isolated QA pairs and reasoning on focused segments, and (2) Document-Scale Regrounding, which programmatically re-embeds these pairs into full-document tasks to ensure realistic complexity. We present SciMDR, a large-scale training dataset for cross-modal comprehension, comprising 300K QA pairs with explicit reasoning chains across 20K scientific papers. We further construct SciMDR-Eval, an expert-annotated benchmark to evaluate multimodal comprehension within full-length scientific workflows. Experiments demonstrate that models fine-tuned on SciMDR achieve significant improvements across multiple scientific QA benchmarks, particularly in tasks requiring complex document-level reasoning.

Chi-Min Chan, Han Zhu, Chunyang Jiang, Jiaming Ji, Juntao Dai, Wei Xue, Sirui Han, Yike Guo

Multimodal Process Reward Models (MPRMs) have emerged as a pivotal framework for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). However, the research community currently lacks a dedicated benchmark to rigorously assess the error discernment capabilities of these models.To address this gap, we introduce PRMBench-V, a novel benchmark specifically designed to evaluate MPRMs’ proficiency in detecting erroneous reasoning steps across diverse error categories. Leveraging a semi-automated annotation pipeline augmented with human verification, we construct a comprehensive dataset comprising 907 unique queries, each annotated with nine distinct error types, resulting in 8,163 test cases with fine-grained step-level error labels.Through extensive experiments involving over 15 open- and closed-source models, we uncover several key findings: (1) even the strongest existing MPRMs achieve only \textasciitilde30\% accuracy in error identification; (2) while partial error detection achieves moderate precision and recall (\textasciitilde60\%), overall accuracy remains low (\textasciitilde20\%); and (3) benchmark scores exhibit a strong correlation with downstream task performance gains (r=0.86). Furthermore, we demonstrate that PRMBench-V can inform the development of more robust MPRMs: by introducing the Bayesian Rater Reliability Process Reward Model (BR2-PRM), we achieve up to a 4.8% performance improvement through test-time scaling.We believe that PRMBench-V will serve as a valuable resource for advancing MPRM research, enabling more rigorous evaluation and fostering the development of models with fine-grained multimodal reasoning capabilities.

Yuqing Zhang, Honghui Sheng, Xueyu Hu, Shengyu Zhang, Fei Wu

Mobile GUI agents powered by LMMs can perceive screens and follow instructions, yet existing benchmarks largely target short, linear workflows and step-level accuracy, offering limited insight into long-horizon planning and decision-making under branching structures. We present DAC-Bench, a decision-aware benchmark with compositional tasks comprising 830 episodes and 11,345 action steps across 35 applications on Android and iOS. Tasks are organized into Sequential, Conjunctive, Conditional, and Hierarchical structures, reflecting real-world multi-step and branching interaction patterns. To complement standard step-level evaluation, we introduce weighted longest common subsequence to capture length-sensitive progress and decision accuracy for branch correctness. Evaluations across 7 diverse agents show substantial performance degradation compared to prior benchmarks, with success rates dropping below 5% on 6–8 step tasks and branch accuracy averaging 38%, highlighting challenges in conditional decision-making. By exposing these failure modes, DAC-Bench provides a challenging and diagnostic benchmark for advancing decision-aware mobile GUI agents. Our code and dataset are available at: https://github.com/YuqingZhangMirror12/DAC-Bench.

Yichen Xu, Liangyu Chen, Liang Zhang, Zihao Yue, Jianzhe Ma, Wenxuan Wang, Qin Jin

Charts are a universally adopted medium for data communication, yet existing chart understanding benchmarks are overwhelmingly English-centric, limiting their accessibility and relevance to global audiences. To address this limitation, we introduce PolyChartQA, the first large-scale multilingual benchmark for chart question answering, comprising 22,606 charts and 26,151 QA pairs across 10 diverse languages. PolyChartQA is constructed through a scalable pipeline that enables efficient multilingual chart generation via data translation and code reuse, supported by LLM-based translation and rigorous quality control. We systematically evaluate multilingual chart understanding with PolyChartQA on state-of-the-art LVLMs and reveal a significant performance gap between English and other languages, particularly low-resource ones. Additionally, we introduce a companion multilingual chart question answering training set, PolyChartQA-Train, on which fine-tuning LVLMs yields substantial gains in multilingual chart understanding across diverse model sizes and architectures. Together, our benchmark provides a foundation for developing globally inclusive vision-language models capable of understanding charts across diverse linguistic contexts. Codes and datasets are available on https://github.com/Road2Redemption/PolyChartQA.

Ruifeng Yuan, Wanxing Chang, Weiwei Cao, Bowen Shi, Zhongyu Wei, Ling Zhang, Jianpeng Zhang

The evaluation of generated reports remains a critical challenge in Computed Tomography (CT) report generation, due to the large volume of text, the diversity and complexity of findings, and the presence of fine-grained, disease-oriented attributes. Conventional evaluation metrics offer only coarse measures of lexical overlap or entity matching and fail to reflect the granular diagnostic accuracy required for clinical use. To address this gap, we propose CT-FineBench, a benchmark built from CT-RATE and Merlin to evaluate the fine-grained factual consistency of CT reports, constructed from CT-RATE and Merlin. Our benchmark is constructed through a meticulous, Question-Answering (QA) based process: first, we identify and structure key, finding-specific clinical attributes (e.g., location, size, margin). Second, we systematically transform these attributes into a QA dataset, where questions probe for specific clinical details grounded in gold-standard reports. The evaluation protocol for CT-FineBench involves using this QA dataset to query a machine-generated report and scoring the correctness of the answers. This allows for a comprehensive, interpretable, and clinically-relevant assessment, moving beyond superficial lexical overlap to pinpoint specific clinical errors. Experiments show that CT-FineBench correlates better with expert clinical assessment and is substantially more sensitive to fine-grained factual errors than prior metrics.

Weicong Liu, Zixuan Yang, Yibo Zhao, Xiang Li

Reviewer assignment is increasingly critical yet challenging in the LLM era, where rapid topic shifts render many pre-2023 benchmarks outdated and where proxy signals poorly reflect true reviewer familiarity. We address this evaluation bottleneck by introducing LR-bench, a high-fidelity, up-to-date benchmark curated from 2024–2025 AI/NLP manuscripts with five-level self-assessed familiarity ratings collected via a large-scale email survey, yielding 1,055 expert-annotated paper–reviewer–score annotations. We further propose a reviewer-centric ranking framework that distills each reviewer’s recent publications into compact keyword-based profiles and fine-tunes an embedding model with weak preference supervision constructed from heuristic retrieval signals, enabling to match each manuscript against a reviewer profile directly. Across the LR-bench and the CMU gold-standard dataset, our approach consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming strong embedding baselines by a clear margin. We release LR-bench at https://huggingface.co/datasets/Gnociew/LR-bench, and an github repository at https://github.com/Gnociew/RATE-Reviewer-Assignment.

Yuxuan Lu, Jing Huang, Yan Han, Bingsheng Yao, Sisong Bei, Yaochen Xie, Yisi Sang, Qi He, Dakuo Wang

Recent research shows that LLM Agents can generate “believable” human behaviors via prompt-only methods, and such agents have been increasingly adopted in downstream applications. However, existing evaluation of these agents only focuses on qualitative believability (whether human raters think they are accurate), leaving open questions of whether LLM agents can accurately generate step-by-step actions mimicking a particular human’s behavior in a multi-turn interaction task. In this work, we take shopping as a case study and present the first large-scale quantitative evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs’ ability to accurately simulate human behavior. Using real-world data from 31,865 online shopping sessions containing 230,965 user actions, our evaluation reveals that prompt-based LLMs (DeepSeek-R1, Llama, Claude) achieve only 11.86% accuracy in generating human actions, highlighting a substantial gap in actual behavioral accuracy. Through experiments, we also showcase that strategies as simple as fine-tuning LLMs on real human click-through data augmented with synthesized reasoning traces can greatly enhance models’ performance. The fine-tuned Qwen2.5-7B achieves 17.26% action generation accuracy and 33.86% F1 score on final purchase prediction, representing substantial improvements of 5.4% and 13.85% over prompt-only baselines. This work establishes the first rigorous benchmark and dataset for human behavior simulation and provides actionable insights for developing more accurate LLM agents for future downstream applications.

Ziyi Wang, Yuxuan Lu, Wenbo Li, Amirali Amini, Bo Sun, Yakov Bart, Weimin Lyu, Jiri Gesi, Tian Wang, Jing Huang 等

Can Large Language models (LLMs) accurately simulate the next web action of a specific user? While LLMs have shown promising capabilities in generating believable human behaviors, evaluating their ability to mimic real user behaviors remains an open challenge, largely due to the lack of high-quality, publicly available datasets that capture both the observable actions and the internal reasoning of an actual human user. To address this gap, we introduce OPeRA, a novel dataset of Observation, Persona, Rationale, and Action collected from real human participants during online shopping sessions. **OPeRA is the first public dataset that comprehensively captures: user personas, browser observations, fine-grained web actions, and self-reported just-in-time rationales**. We developed both an online questionnaire and a custom browser plugin to gather this dataset with high fidelity. Using OPeRA, we establish **the first benchmark to evaluate how well current LLMs can predict a specific user’s next action** and rationale with a given persona and <observation, action, rationale> history. This dataset lays the groundwork for future research into LLM agents that aim to act as personalized digital twins for human.

Fengxian Ji, Jingpu Yang, Zirui Song, Lang Gao, Junhong Liang, Zhenhao Chen, Jinghui Zhang, Xiuying Chen

Recent image generation and editing models demonstrate robust adherence to instructions and high visual quality on academic benchmarks.However, their performance on paid, real-world design projects remains uncertain. We introduce ServImage, a benchmark that explicitly correlates model outputs with economic value in commercial design projects. ServImage consists of (i) ServImageBench: a dataset of 1.07k paid commercial design tasks and 2.05k designer deliverables totaling over $295k, covering portrait, product, and digital content, along with 33k candidate images and 33k human annotations.(ii) ServImageScore: an integrated scoring system that combines three quality dimensions: baseline requirements fulfilment, visual execution quality, and commercial necessity satisfaction. These three dimensions are designed to characterize the factors that drive human payment decisions and indicate whether an image is commercially acceptable.(iii) ServImageModel: under this scoring system, we propose a payment prediction model trained on the human-annotated candidate images, achieving 82.00% accuracy in predicting human payment decisions and producing calibrated payment probabilities.ServImage provides a comprehensive foundation for assessing the commercial viability of image generation models and offers a scalable resource for future research on economically grounded vision systems Github.

Jikun Wan, Chen Gong, Guohong Fu

Multimodal emotion cause analysis in conversation aims to identify the causes of emotions by leveraging multimodal information. Existing studies mainly formulate this problem as either utterance-level emotion cause extraction, which provides clear cause localization but limited explanation, or multimodal emotion cause generation, which offers fine-grained explanations but lacks explicit traceability to source utterances. Moreover, existing datasets rely heavily on human judgment and lack well-defined structured theoretical guidance, leading to subjective and inconsistent annotations. To address these issues, we introduce joint Multimodal Emotion Cause Extraction and Summarization in conversation (MECES), a new task that simultaneously extracts emotion cause utterances and generates cause summaries, enabling both precise localization and interpretable explanations of emotion cause. We further construct a MECES dataset guided by the Activating Events–Beliefs–Consequences theory from psychology. This dataset consists of 5,787 emotion utterances annotated with causes, comprising 12,231 emotion-cause pairs and 6,040 cause summaries. We also propose an effective end-to-end joint learning approach for MECES task, establishing strong benchmark results for this newly introduced task and dataset.

Zhen Wan, Chao-Han Huck Yang, Jinchuan Tian, Hanrong Ye, Ankita Pasad, Szu-Wei Fu, Arushi Goel, Ryo Hachiuma, Shizhe Diao, Kunal Dhawan 等

We introduce a voice-agentic framework that learns one critical omni-understanding skill: knowing when to trust itself versus when to consult external audio perception. Our work is motivated by a crucial yet counterintuitive finding: naively fine-tuning an omni-model on both speech recognition and external sound understanding tasks often degrades performance, as the model can be easily misled by noisy hypotheses. To address this, our framework, Speech-Hands, recasts the problem as an explicit self-reflection decision. This learnable reflection primitive proves effective in preventing the model from being derailed by flawed external candidates. We show that this agentic action mechanism generalizes naturally from speech recognition to complex, multiple-choice audio reasoning. Across the OpenASR leaderboard, which includes seven domain-diverse speech datasets, Speech-Hands consistently outperforms strong baselines by 12.1% WER on the OpenASR benchmark. The model also achieves 77.37% accuracy and high F1 on audio QA decisions, showing robust generalization and reliability across diverse audio question answering datasets. By unifying perception and decision-making, our work offers a practical path toward more reliable and resilient audio intelligence.

Lina Sun

Although Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated substantial proficiency in reasoning, current approaches focus disproportionately on scaling correct training samples, underexploring the value of incorrect reasoning trajectories. Motivated by how humans learn from mistakes, we propose ReActR (Reasoning through Error-Activated Reflection), a framework that enhances reasoning by learning reflective behaviors from erroneous trajectories. Specifically, ReActR comprises data construction and training. First, we synthesize multi-turn erroneous reasoning dataset spanning diverse error types and difficult levels via self-generation and targeted error generation. Second, we enhance the model’s capabilities through Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on synthesized data and then apply Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) with multiple reward signals to further refine reasoning performance. Extensive experiments across five benchmarks and three LLMs demonstrate that ReActR effectively enhances reasoning performance. Notably, on Llama-3-8B, ReActR achieves an average improvement of 3.5% across the five datasets.

Radin Shayanfar, Chu Fei Luo, Rohan V Bhambhoria, Samuel Dahan, Xiaodan Zhu

Building Task-Oriented Dialogue (TOD) systems that generalize across different tasks remains a challenging problem. Data-driven approaches often struggle to transfer effectively to unseen tasks. While recent schema-based TOD frameworks improve generalization by decoupling task logic from language understanding, their reliance on neural or generative models often obscures how task schemas influence behaviour and hence impair interpretability. In this work, we introduce a novel framework, CoDial (Code for Dialogue), at the core of which is converting a predefined task schema to a structured heterogeneous graph and then to popular programmatic LLM guardrailing code, such as NVIDIA’s Colang. The pipeline enables efficient and interpretable alignment of dialogue policies during inference. We introduce two paradigms for LLM guardrailing code generation, CoDial-free and CoDial-structured, and propose a mechanism that integrates human feedback to iteratively improve the generated code. Empirically, CoDial achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on the widely used benchmark datasets, while providing inherent interpretability in the design. We additionally demonstrate CoDial’s iterative improvement via manual and LLM-aided feedback, making it a practical tool for human-guided alignment of LLMs in unseen domains.

Linlin Yu, Xujiang Zhao, Dong Li, Yanchi Liu, Wei Cheng, Zhengzhang Chen, Chen Zhao, Feng Chen, Haifeng Chen

Automatically solving optimization problems from natural language descriptions with both efficiency and reliability is highly desirable but remains challenging. Language model hallucinations and the limited availability of labeled datasets often result in misaligned formulations, code errors, and feasibility failures We propose UMCTS, an Uncertainty-aware Monte Carlo Tree Search framework that combines the language understanding capability of large language models with the reliability of well-established solvers. UMCTS structures the solution process into four stages: global instruction, assumptions, mathematical formulation, and solver code generation. It employs Monte Carlo Tree Search with semantic-equivalence pruning, prior-guided exploration, and solver-based feasibility checks. An LLM judge provides numerical reward signals, qualitative error information, and uncertainty estimates. These signals are backpropagated to guide the search and flag unreliable outputs. Across six public benchmarks, UMCTS achieves state-of-the-art solution accuracy, improves efficiency by reducing token usage.

Muhammad Umer Sheikh, Khawar Shehzad, Salman Khan, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, Muhammad Haris Khan

Climate decision-making in the GCC states increasingly demands systems that can translate heterogeneous scientific and policy evidence into actionable guidance, yet general-purpose large language models (LLMs) remain weak both in region-specific climate knowledge and grounded interaction with geospatial and forecasting tools. We present the GCA framework, which unifies (i) GCA-DS, a curated multimodal dataset grounded in the GCC states, and (ii) Gulf Climate Agent (GCA), a tool-augmented agent for climate analysis. GCA-DS comprises nearly 200k question-answer pairs spanning governmental policies and adaptation plans, NGO and international frameworks, academic literature, and event-driven reporting on heatwaves, dust storms, and floods, complemented with remote-sensing inputs that couple imagery with textual evidence. Building on this foundation, the GCA agent orchestrates a modular tool pipeline grounded in real-time and historical signals and geospatial processing that produces derived indices and interpretable visualizations. Finally, we benchmark open and proprietary LLMs on climate tasks in the GCC states and show that domain fine-tuning and tool integration substantially improve reliability over general-purpose baselines.

Alexander Scarlatos, Jaewook Lee, Simon Woodhead, Andrew Lan

Advances in large language models (LLMs) enable many new innovations in education. However, evaluating the effectiveness of new technology requires real students, which is time-consuming and hard to scale up. Therefore, many recent works on LLM-powered tutoring solutions have used simulated students for both training and evaluation, often via simple prompting. Surprisingly, little work has been done to ensure or even measure the quality of simulated students. In this work, we formally define the student simulation task, propose a set of evaluation metrics that span linguistic, behavioral, and cognitive aspects, and benchmark a wide range of student simulation methods on these metrics. We experiment on a real-world math tutoring dialogue dataset, where both automated and human evaluation results show that prompting strategies for student simulation perform poorly; supervised fine-tuning and preference optimization yield much better but still limited performance, motivating future work on this challenging task.

Jiyeon Kim, Hyunji Lee, Dylan Zhou, Sue Hyun Park, Seunghyun Yoon, Trung Bui, Franck Dernoncourt, Sungmin Cha, Minjoon Seo

LLMs operating in dynamic real-world contexts often encounter knowledge that evolves continuously or emerges incrementally. To remain accurate and effective, models must adapt to newly arriving information on the fly. We introduce Online Adaptation to Continual Knowledge Streams(OAKS) to evaluate this capability, establishing a benchmark for online adaptation over streaming, continually updating knowledge. Specifically, the benchmark is structured as a sequence of fine-grained context chunks where facts change dynamically across time intervals. OAKS comprises two datasets: OAKS-BABI and OAKS-Novel, where individual facts evolve multiple times across context chunks. These datasets include dense annotations to measure whether models track changes accurately. Evaluating 14 models with varied inference approaches, we observe significant limitations in current methodologies. Both state-of-the-art models and agentic memory systems fail to adapt robustly on OAKS, demonstrating delays in state-tracking and susceptibility to distraction within streaming environments. We will open-source the code and datasets.