Learning Japanese vocabulary is a challenge for learners from Roman alphabet backgrounds due to script differences. Japanese combines syllabaries like hiragana with kanji, which are logographic characters of Chinese origin. Kanji are also complicated due to their complexity and volume. Keyword mnemonics are a common strategy to aid memorization, often using the compositional structure of kanji to form vivid associations. Despite recent efforts to use large language models (LLMs) to assist learners, existing methods for LLM-based keyword mnemonic generation function as a black box, offering limited interpretability. We propose a generative framework that explicitly models the mnemonic construction process as driven by a set of common rules, and learn them using a novel Expectation-Maximization-type algorithm. Trained on learner-authored mnemonics from an online platform, our method learns latent structures and compositional rules, enabling interpretable and systematic mnemonics generation. Experiments show that our method performs well in the cold-start setting for new learners while providing insight into the mechanisms behind effective mnemonic creation.
论文检索
输入标题、作者或关键词，从 7,591 篇学术成果中精准定位
In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the field of natural language processing. However, they often suffer from knowledge gaps and hallucinations. Graph retrieval-augmented generation (GraphRAG) enhances LLM reasoning by integrating structured knowledge from external graphs. However, we identify two key challenges that plague GraphRAG: (1) Retrieving noisy and irrelevant information can degrade performance and (2) Excessive reliance on external knowledge suppresses the model’s intrinsic reasoning.To address these issues, we propose GraphRAG-FI (Filtering & Integration), consisting of GraphRAG-Filtering and GraphRAG-Integration. GraphRAG-Filtering employs a two-stage filtering mechanism to refine retrieved information. GraphRAG-Integration employs a logits-based selection strategy to balance external knowledge from GraphRAG with the LLM’s intrinsic reasoning, reducing over-reliance on retrievals. Experiments on knowledge graph QA tasks demonstrate that GraphRAG-FI significantly improves reasoning performance across multiple backbone models, establishing a more reliable and effective GraphRAG framework.
Large Language models have demonstrated promising performance in research ideation across scientific domains. Hypothesis development, the process of generating a highly specific declarative statement connecting a research idea with empirical validation, has received relatively less attention. Existing approaches trivially deploy retrieval augmentation and focus only on the quality of the final output ignoring the underlying reasoning process behind ideation. We present \texttt{HypER} (\textbf{Hyp}othesis Generation with \textbf{E}xplanation and \textbf{R}easoning), a small language model (SLM) trained for literature-guided reasoning and evidence-based hypothesis generation. \texttt{HypER} is trained in a multi-task setting to discriminate between valid and invalid scientific reasoning chains in presence of controlled distractions. We find that \texttt{HypER} outperformes the base model, distinguishing valid from invalid reasoning chains (+22% average absolute F1), generates better evidence-grounded hypotheses (0.327 vs. 0.305 base model) with high feasibility and impact as judged by human experts (>3.5 on 5-point Likert scale).
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) introduce a new generation paradigm of explicitly reasoning before answering, leading to remarkable improvements in complex tasks. However, they pose great safety risks against harmful queries and adversarial attacks. While recent mainstream safety efforts on LRMs, supervised fine-tuning (SFT), improve safety performance, we find that SFT-aligned models struggle to generalize to unseen jailbreak prompts. After thorough investigation, we identify a safety aha moment that can activate safety reasoning and lead to a safe response. This aha moment typically appears in the ‘key sentence’ that follows models’ query understanding process and can indicate whether the model will proceed safely. Based on these insights, we propose SafeKey, including two complementary objectives to better activate the safety aha-moment in the key sentence: (1) a Dual-Path Safety Head to enhance the safety signal in the model’s internal representations before the key sentence, and (2) a Query-Mask Modeling objective to improve the models’ attention on its query understanding, which has important safety hints. Experiments across multiple safety benchmarks demonstrate that our methods significantly improve safety generalization to a wide range of jailbreak attacks and out-of-distribution harmful prompts, lowering the harmfulness rate by 9.6%, while maintaining general abilities. Our analysis reveals how SafeKey enhances safety by reshaping internal attention and improving the quality of hidden representations.
Humans can learn to solve new tasks by inducing high-level strategies from example solutions to similar problems and then adapting these strategies to solve unseen problems. Can we use large language models to induce such high-level structure from example documents or solutions? We introduce fLSA, a foundation-model-based Latent Semantic Analysis method that iteratively clusters and tags document segments based on document-level contexts. These tags can be used to model the latent structure of given documents and for hierarchical sampling of new texts. Our experiments on story writing, math, and multi-step reasoning datasets demonstrate that fLSA tags are more informative in reconstructing the original texts than existing tagging methods. Moreover, when used for hierarchical sampling, fLSA tags help expand the output space in the right directions that lead to correct solutions more often than direct sampling and hierarchical sampling with existing tagging methods.
We introduce proactive hearing assistants that automatically identify and separate the wearer’s conversation partners, without requiring explicit prompts. Our system operates on egocentric binaural audio and uses the wearer’s self-speech as an anchor, leveraging turn-taking behavior and dialogue dynamics to infer conversational partners and suppress others. To enable real-time, on-device operation, we propose a dual-model architecture: a lightweight streaming model runs every 12.5 ms for low-latency extraction of the conversation partners, while a slower model runs less frequently to capture longer-range conversational dynamics. Results on real-world 2- and 3-speaker conversation test sets, collected with binaural egocentric hardware from 11 participants totaling 6.8 hours, show generalization in identifying and isolating conversational partners in multi-conversation settings. Our work marks a step toward hearing assistants that adapt proactively to conversational dynamics and engagement.
Real-world decision-making often begins with identifying which modality contains the most relevant information for a given query. While recent multimodal models have made impressive progress in processing diverse inputs, it remains unclear whether they can reason contrastively across multiple modalities to select the one that best satisfies a natural language prompt. We argue this capability is foundational, especially in retrieval-augmented and decision-time contexts, where systems must evaluate multiple signals and identify which one conveys the relevant information. To evaluate this skill, we introduce Contra4, a dataset for contrastive cross-modal reasoning across four modalities: image, audio, video, and 3D. Each example presents a natural language question alongside multiple candidate modality instances, and the model must select the one that semantically aligns with the prompt. Contra4 combines human-annotated captions with a mixture-of-models round-trip-consistency filter to ensure high-quality supervision, resulting in 174k training examples and a manually verified test set of 2.3k samples. While task-specific fine-tuning improves performance by 56% relative to baseline, state-of-the-art models still achieve only 56% accuracy overall and 42% in four-modality settings, underscoring a significant limitation in current multimodal models.
FairGen: Controlling Sensitive Attributes for Fair Generations in Diffusion Models via Adaptive Latent Guidance
PDF ↗Text-to-image diffusion models often exhibit biases toward specific demographic groups, such as generating more males than females when prompted to generate images of engineers, raising ethical concerns and limiting their adoption. In this paper, we tackle the challenge of mitigating generation bias towards any target attribute value (e.g., “male” for “gender”) in diffusion models while preserving generation quality. We propose FairGen, an adaptive latent guidance mechanism which controls the generation distribution during inference. In FairGen, a latent guidance module dynamically adjusts the diffusion process to enforce specific attributes, while a memory module tracks the generation statistics and steers latent guidance to align with the targeted fair distribution of the attribute values. Further, given the limitations of existing datasets in comprehensively assessing bias in diffusion models, we introduce a holistic bias evaluation benchmark HBE, covering diverse domains and incorporating complex prompts across various applications. Extensive evaluations on HBE and Stable Bias datasets demonstrate that FairGen outperforms existing bias mitigation approaches, achieving substantial bias reduction (e.g., 68.5% gender bias reduction on Stable Diffusion 2). Ablation studies highlight FairGen’s ability to flexibly and precisely control generation distribution at any user-specified granularity, ensuring adaptive and targeted bias mitigation.
Clarifying the research framing of NLP artefacts (e.g., models, datasets, etc.) is crucial to aligning research with practical applications when researchers claim that their findings have real-world impact. Recent studies manually analyzed NLP research across domains, showing that few papers explicitly identify key stakeholders, intended uses, or appropriate contexts. In this work, we propose to automate this analysis, developing a three-component system that infers research framings by first extracting key elements (means, ends, stakeholders), then linking them through interpretable rules and contextual reasoning.We evaluate our approach on two domains: automated fact-checking using an existing dataset, and hate speech detection for which we annotate a new dataset—achieving consistent improvements over strong LLM baselines.Finally, we apply our system to recent automated fact-checking papers and uncover three notable trends: a rise in underspecified research goals, increased emphasis on scientific exploration over application, and a shift toward supporting human fact-checkers rather than pursuing full automation.
Advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have improved multi-step reasoning by generating free-text rationales, but these models tend to lose focus over the middle of long contexts. This raises concerns that as reasoning progresses, LLMs may overlook information in earlier steps when decoding subsequent steps, leading to unreliable and redundant rationales. To address this, we propose guiding LLMs to generate more accurate and concise rationales by (1) proactively referencing information from underutilized prior steps, and (2) minimizing redundant information between new and existing steps. We introduce stepwise informativeness search, an inference-time tree search framework incorporating two selection heuristics: grounding-guided selection which prioritizes steps paying higher attention over underutilized steps; and novelty-guided selection which encourages steps with novel conclusions. We further utilize a self-grounding strategy that prompts LLMs to explicitly reference relevant prior steps as premises before deduction at each step, mitigating distraction from irrelevant content. Experiments on five reasoning datasets across five LLMs show the effectiveness and efficiency of our approach to improve reasoning with reduced errors and redundancy.
We introduce CSAR, an algorithm for inducing morphemes from emergent language corpora of parallel utterances and meanings.It is a greedy algorithm that (1) weights morphemes based on mutual information between forms and meanings, (2) selects the highest-weighted pair, (3) removes it from the corpus, and (4) repeats the process to induce further morphemes (i.e., Count, Select, Ablate, Repeat).The effectiveness of CSAR is first validated on procedurally generated datasets and compared against baselines for related tasks.Second, we validate CSAR’s performance on human language data to show that the algorithm makes reasonable predictions in adjacent domains.Finally, we analyze a handful of emergent languages, quantifying linguistic characteristics like degree of synonymy and polysemy.
Identifying & Interactively Refining Ambiguous User Goals for Data Visualization Code Generation
PDF ↗Establishing shared goals is a fundamental step in human-AI communication. However, ambiguities can lead to outputs that seem correct but fail to reflect the speaker’s intent. In this paper, we explore this issue with a focus on the data visualization domain, where ambiguities in natural language impact the generation of code that visualizes data. The availability of multiple views on the contextual (e.g. the intended plot and the code rendering the plot) allows for a unique and comprehensive analysis of diverse ambiguity types. We develop a taxonomy of types of ambiguity that arise in this task and propose metrics to quantify them. Using Matplotlib problems from the DS-1000 dataset, we demonstrate that our ambiguity metrics better correlate with human annotations than uncertainty baselines. Our work also explores how multi-turn dialogue can reduce ambiguity, and therefore, improve code accuracy by better matching user goals. We evaluate three pragmatic models to inform our dialogue strategies: Gricean Cooperativity, Discourse Representation Theory, and Questions under Discussion. A simulated user study reveals how pragmatic dialogues reduce ambiguity and enhance code accuracy, highlighting the value of multi-turn exchanges in code generation.
Training text embedding models under differential privacy constraints is challenging due to the high dimensionality of language data and the presence of rare, identifying linguistic features. We propose (Differentially Private Embedding Distillation), a framework that leverages teacher-student distillation with multi-layer noise injection to learn high-quality embeddings while providing differential privacy guarantees. DPED trains an ensemble of teacher models on disjoint subsets of sensitive text data, then transfers their knowledge to a student model through noisy aggregation at multiple layers. A rare-word-aware strategy adaptively handles infrequent words, improving privacy-utility trade-offs. Experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that DPED outperforms standard differentially private training methods, achieving substantially higher utility at the same privacy budget. Our approach protects individual word usage patterns in training documents, preventing models from memorizing unique linguistic fingerprints while maintaining practical utility for downstream NLP tasks. Source code is available at https://github.com/datasec-lab/DPED.
We introduce Refeeding State Embeddings aligned using Environmental Data (ReSEED), a novel method for grounding language in environmental data. While large language models (LLMs) excel at many tasks, they continue to struggle with multi-step sequential reasoning. ReSEED addresses this by producing latent embeddings aligned with the true state of the environment and refeeding these embeddings into the model before generating its output. To evaluate its effectiveness, we develop three new sequential reasoning benchmarks, each with a training set of paired state-text trajectories and several text-only evaluation sets that test generalization to longer, unseen trajectories. Across all benchmarks, ReSEED significantly improves generalization and scalability over a text-only baseline. We further show that ReSEED outperforms commercial LLMs on our benchmarks, highlighting the value of grounding language in the environment.
Materials science research requires multi-step reasoning and precise material informatics retrieval, where minor errors can propagate into significant failures in downstream experiments. Despite their general success, Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with hallucinations, handling domain-specific data effectively (e.g., crystal structures), and integrating experimental workflows. To address these challenges, we introduce LLaMP, a hierarchical multi-agent framework designed to emulate the materials science research workflow. The high-level supervisor agent decomposes user requests into sub-tasks and coordinates with specialized assistant agents. These assistant agents handle domain-specific tasks, such as retrieving and processing data from the Materials Project (MP) or conducting simulations as needed. This pipeline facilitates iterative refinement of material property retrieval and enables the simulation of real-world research workflows. To ensure reliability, we propose a novel metric combining uncertainty and confidence estimate to evaluate the self-consistency of responses from LLaMP and baseline methods. Our experiments demonstrate LLaMP’s superior performance in material property retrieval, crystal structure editing, and annealing molecular dynamics simulations using pre-trained interatomic potentials. Unlike prior work focused solely on material property prediction or discovery, LLaMP serves as a foundation for autonomous materials research by combining grounded informatics and enabling iterative experimental processes. Code and live demo are available at https://github.com/chiang-yuan/llamp.
HyperKGR: Knowledge Graph Reasoning in Hyperbolic Space with Graph Neural Network Encoding Symbolic Path
PDF ↗Knowledge graphs (KGs) enable reasoning tasks such as link prediction, question answering, and knowledge discovery. However, real-world KGs are often incomplete, making link prediction both essential and challenging. Existing methods, including embedding-based and path-based approaches, rely on Euclidean embeddings, which struggle to capture hierarchical structures. GNN-based methods aggregate information through message passing in Euclidean space, but they struggle to effectively encode the recursive tree-like structures that emerge in multi-hop reasoning. To address these challenges, we propose a hyperbolic GNN framework that embeds recursive learning trees in hyperbolic space and generates query-specific embeddings. By incorporating hierarchical message passing, our method naturally aligns with reasoning paths and dynamically adapts to queries, improving prediction accuracy. Unlike static embedding-based approaches, our model computes context-aware embeddings tailored to each query. Experiments on multiple benchmark datasets show that our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, demonstrating its effectiveness in KG reasoning.
ALLabel: Three-stage Active Learning for LLM-based Entity Recognition using Demonstration Retrieval
PDF ↗Many contemporary data-driven research efforts in the natural sciences, such as chemistry and materials science, require large-scale, high-performance entity recognition from scientific datasets. Large language models (LLMs) have increasingly been adopted to solve the entity recognition task, with the same trend being observed on all-spectrum NLP tasks. The prevailing entity recognition LLMs rely on fine-tuned technology, yet the fine-tuning process often incurs significant cost. To achieve a best performance-cost trade-off, we propose ALLabel, a three-stage framework designed to select the most informative and representative samples in preparing the demonstrations for LLM modeling. The annotated examples are used to construct a ground-truth retrieval corpus for LLM in-context learning. By sequentially employing three distinct active learning strategies, ALLabel consistently outperforms all baselines under the same annotation budget across three specialized domain datasets. Experimental results also demonstrate that selectively annotating only 5%-10% of the dataset with ALLabel can achieve performance comparable to the method annotating the entire dataset. Further analyses and ablation studies verify the effectiveness and generalizability of our proposal.
Within the common LLM use case of text revision, we study LLMs’ revision of gendered role nouns (e.g., outdoorsperson/woman/man) and their justifications of such revisions. We evaluate their alignment with feminist and trans-inclusive language reforms for English. Drawing on insight from sociolinguistics, we further assess if LLMs are sensitive to the same contextual effects in the application of such reforms as people are, finding broad evidence of such effects. We discuss implications for value alignment.
We present WebMMU, a multilingual benchmark that evaluates three core web tasks: (1) website visual question answering, (2) code editing involving HTML/CSS/JavaScript, and (3) mockup-to-code generation. Unlike prior benchmarks that treat these tasks separately, WebMMU unifies them using expert-annotated, real-world web data to assess models’ abilities in complex multi-step reasoning, precise element grounding, and functional UI comprehension and coding. Our evaluation shows that while multimodal large language models (MLLMs) perform well on basic information extraction, they struggle with reasoning and grounding, editing code to preserve functionality, and generating design-to-code that maintains hierarchy and supports multilingual content. These findings reveal key limitations in current MLLMs and underscore the need for improved multimodal and cross-lingual reasoning to build future web agents capable of automating diverse web development tasks.
HESEIA: A community-based dataset for evaluating social biases in large language models, co-designed in real school settings in Latin America
PDF ↗Most resources for evaluating social biases in Large Language Models are developed without co-design from the communities affected by these biases, and rarely involve participatory approaches. We introduce HESEIA, a dataset of 46,499 sentences created in a professional development course. The course involved 370 high-school teachers and 5,370 students from 189 Latin-American schools. Unlike existing benchmarks, HESEIA captures intersectional biases across multiple demographic axes and school subjects. It reflects local contexts through the lived experience and pedagogical expertise of educators. Teachers used minimal pairs to create sentences that express stereotypes relevant to their school subjects and communities. We show the dataset diversity in term of demographic axes represented and also in terms of the knowledge areas included. We demonstrate that the dataset contains more stereotypes unrecognized by current LLMs than previous datasets. HESEIA is available to support bias assessments grounded in educational communities.