论文检索

Rajvee Sheth, Samridhi Raj Sinha, Mahavir Patil, Himanshu Beniwal, Mayank Singh

Amidst the rapid advances of large language models (LLMs), most LLMs still struggle with mixed-language inputs, limited Code-switching (CSW) datasets, and evaluation biases, which hinder their deployment in multilingual societies. This survey provides the first comprehensive analysis of CSW-aware LLM research, reviewing 327 studies spanning five research areas, 15+ NLP tasks, 30+ datasets, and 80+ languages. We classify recent advances by architecture, training strategy, and evaluation methodology, outlining how LLMs have reshaped CSW modelling and what challenges persist. The paper concludes with a roadmap emphasizing the need for inclusive datasets, fair evaluation, and linguistically grounded models to achieve truly multilingual intelligence. A curated collection of all resources is maintained at https://github.com/lingo-iitgn/awesome-code-mixing/.

Negar Foroutan, Clara Meister, Debjit Paul, Joel Niklaus, Sina Ahmadi, Antoine Bosselut, Rico Sennrich

Tokenization is the first—and often least scrutinized—step of most NLP pipelines. Standard algorithms for learning tokenizers rely on frequency-based objectives, which favor languages dominant in the training data and consequently leave lower-resource languages with tokenizations that are disproportionately longer, morphologically implausible, or even riddled with <UNK> placeholders. This phenomenon ultimately amplifies computational and financial inequalities between users from different language backgrounds. To remedy this, we introduce Parity-aware Byte Pair Encoding (BPE), a variant of the widely-used BPE algorithm. At every merge step, Parity-aware BPE applies a fair-max rule that maximizes the compression gain of the currently worst-compressed language, trading a small amount of global compression for cross-lingual parity. We find empirically that Parity-aware BPE reduces tokenization inequality—operationalized by the Gini coefficient of per-language token costs—by up to 89% relative to Classical BPE. This comes with negligible impact on global compression rate and no evidence of systematic degradation in downstream LM performance.

Xu Chu, Guanyu Wang, Zhijie Tan, Xinrong Chen, Ziyu Li, Tong Mo, Weiping Li

Large Language Models (LLMs) suffer from order bias, where their performance is affected by the arrangement order of input elements. This unfairness limits the model’s applications in scenarios such as in-context learning and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). Recent studies attempt to obtain optimal or suboptimal arrangements based on statistical results or using dataset-based search, but these methods increase inference overhead while leaving the model’s inherent order bias unresolved. Other studies mitigate order sensitivity through supervised fine-tuning using augmented training sets with multiple order variants, but often at the cost of accuracy, trapping the model in consistent yet incorrect hallucinations. In this paper, we propose Dual Group Advantage Optimization (DGAO), which aims to improve model accuracy and order stability simultaneously. DGAO calculates and balances intra-group relative accuracy advantage and inter-group relative stability advantage, rewarding the policy model for generating order-stable and correct outputs while penalizing order-sensitive or incorrect responses. This marks the first time reinforcement learning has been used to mitigate LLMs’ order sensitivity. We also propose two new metrics, Consistency Rate and Overconfidence Rate, to reveal the pseudo-stability of previous methods and guide more comprehensive evaluation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DGAO achieves superior order fairness while improving performance on RAG, mathematical reasoning, and classification tasks. Our code is available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/DGAO-A481/

Satyam Kumar, Kaustubh Shivshankar Shejole, Pushpak Bhattacharyya

Automatic radiology report generation (RRG) has emerged as a promising approach to reduce clinicians’ workload, yet existing systems are vulnerable to biases induced by spurious correlations across data, models, and evaluation pipelines. Such biases raise serious fairness concerns and may adversely affect patient care, making their mitigation critical in clinical settings. Leveraging causal inference to identify true cause-effect relationships can mitigate many biases and yield fair, reliable systems with clinically meaningful outputs. Existing surveys on RRG primarily emphasize deep learning approaches while overlooking the critical role of causality. This survey addresses this gap by analyzing bias across the RRG pipeline, formalizing RRG as a causal modeling problem, and reviewing representative causal techniques from the literature. Based on the level of intervention, we organize existing mitigation strategies into a three-tier taxonomy. We further examine commonly used public medical imaging datasets and evaluation metrics through a causal lens, revealing their biases and limitations in capturing causal alignment and clinical fidelity. To address these limitations, we advocate broader demographic coverage and causal-aware evaluation metrics to improve fairness and reliability, and identify important directions for future work.

Zirui Yan, Dennis Wei, Dmitriy A Katz, Prasanna Sattigeri, Ali Tajer

Causal tracing systematically intervenes on a large language model’s (LLM’s) internal representations to uncover and quantify the causal pathways linking specific inputs or computations to specific metrics of interest, quantifying the LLM’s behavior. Building on previous single-component or single-layer studies, this paper presents a unified framework for causally tracing multiple components simultaneously. This framework systematically identifies the subsets of components (e.g., attention heads and multi-layer perceptron neurons) most critical to a desired target performance metric (e.g., accuracy and fairness). This is achieved by incorporating flexible interventions applied to a wide range of desired metrics. To address the combinatorial complexity of the multi-component problem, an efficient algorithm is designed that leverages soft interventions and a carefully designed metric transformation, converting the combinatorial search problem into a continuous one that can be solved efficiently under proper constraints, thereby generating proper binary decisions for selecting components. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method efficiently identifies subsets of the model’s components that have a high impact on the target metric, outperforming existing baseline approaches.

Abdelrahman Abdallah, Mohammed Ali, Bhawna Piryani, Adam Jatowt

Although Large Language Models (LLMs) show strong potential for zero-shot document ranking, current listwise approaches face three critical limitations. First, context length constraints prevent processing many documents simultaneously. Second, sequential generation creates bottlenecks that cannot run in parallel. Third, ranking results depend heavily on initial document order, leading to inconsistent performance. We introduce BracketRank, a reasoning-driven competitive elimination framework that addresses these challenges through systematic group competition. Our method uses adaptive grouping to automatically optimise group sizes based on LLM context limits, reasoning-enhanced prompts that require explicit relevance explanations, and bracket-style elimination where documents compete through winner and loser brackets. This structure ensures every document has fair advancement opportunities regardless of initial positioning while allowing for parallel processing across competition stages. We evaluate BracketRank on TREC DL 19, TREC DL 20, and eight BEIR benchmark datasets. Results show that BracketRank achieves 77.90 NDCG@5 on TREC DL 19 and 75.85 NDCG@5 on TREC DL 20, outperforming RankGPT and other state-of-the-art methods. On BEIR datasets, BracketRank reaches 54.66 average NDCG@10, demonstrating robust performance across diverse domains.

Enzhi Wang, Jiaming Zhou, Yuhang Jia, Aobo Kong, Qicheng Li, Yong Qin

Recent advances in speech large language models (e.g., GPT-4o) have enabled end-to-end spoken interactions, yet their robustness in real-world applications remains unclear, where systems must assist users in completing specific tasks under complex conditions such as multi-turn, ambiguous, and often spontaneous speech, as well as natural alternation between speech and text. Task-oriented dialogue (TOD) offers a realistic scenario to evaluate whether models can effectively help users accomplish such task-oriented goals, but existing benchmarks are mainly text-based, and the few speech datasets are limited to English and often neglect spontaneous disfluencies and speaker diversity. To address this gap, we introduce RealTalk-CN, the first Chinese multi-turn, multi-domain speech–text TOD dataset, containing 5.4k dialogues (60K turns, ~150 hours) of real human-to-human recordings with detailed annotations for dialogue states, disfluency types, and speaker characteristics. Based on this dataset, we propose a cross-modal interaction task supporting dynamic speech-text switching and a comprehensive evaluation protocol assessing robustness to disfluencies, sensitivity to speaker variation, and cross-domain generalization. Experiments on state-of-the-art models demonstrate the challenges posed by RealTalk-CN and establish its value as a benchmark for developing reliable and fair Speech LLMs in real-world deployments. The dataset and evaluation framework are available to encourage further research.

Amin Banayeeanzade, Ala N. Tak, Fatemeh Bahrani, Anahita Bolourani, Leonardo Blas, Emilio Ferrara, Jonathan Gratch, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy

The ability to control LLMs’ emulated emotional states and personality traits is an essential step in enabling rich, human-centered interactions in socially interactive settings. We introduce PsySET, a Psychologically-informed benchmark to evaluate LLM Steering Effectiveness and Trustworthiness across the emotion and personality domains. Our study spans four models from different LLM families paired with various steering strategies, including prompting, fine-tuning, and representation engineering. Our results indicate that prompting is consistently effective but limited in intensity control, whereas vector injections achieve finer controllability while slightly reducing output quality. Moreover, we explore the trustworthiness of steered LLMs by assessing safety, truthfulness, fairness, and ethics, highlighting potential side effects and behavioral shifts. Notably, we observe idiosyncratic effects; for instance, even a positive emotion like joy can degrade robustness to adversarial factuality, lower privacy awareness, and increase preferential bias. Meanwhile, anger predictably elevates toxicity yet strengthens leakage resistance. Our framework establishes the first holistic evaluation of emotion and personality steering, offering insights into its interpretability and reliability for socially interactive applications.

Guoxi Zhang, Jiawei Chen, Tianzhuo Yang, Jiaming Ji, Yaodong Yang, Juntao Dai

Large language models (LLMs) are shaping global values, yet they frequently exhibit a pronounced WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) cultural bias, marginalizing diverse viewpoints and posing challenges for reconciling diverse populations with varying cultural backgrounds and value systems. In this work, we move beyond simple alignment methods to propose a new paradigm for cross-cultural fairness. We introduce a Nash Consensus Negotiation framework under the formulation of cross-cultural consensus as a Nash Equilibrium. Each LLM iteratively proposes and refines natural-language guidelines, guided by a utility function balancing self-consistency with mutual acceptance, while penalizing redundancy. The process expands the proposal space and converges to a consensus, yielding fair and interpretable consensus outcomes. We evaluate our framework against baselines using quantitative metrics, qualitative analysis, and large-scale human studies. Experiments demonstrate that our framework generates higher-quality and more balanced consensus, effectively mitigating assimilation toward WEIRD values. Furthermore, we finetune diverse LLM architectures with negotiation data via preference optimization and supervised reasoning, reducing cultural distances by up to 95.53%. Overall, our work offers a systematic path to mitigate cultural bias in LLMs by guiding them toward self-consistency, mutually-acceptable equilibria.

Deep Learning · Large Language Models

Julie Kallini, Artidoro Pagnoni, Tomasz Limisiewicz, Gargi Ghosh, Luke Zettlemoyer, Christopher Potts, Xiaochuang Han, Srinivasan Iyer

Recent byte-level language models (LMs) match the performance of token-level models without relying on subword vocabularies, yet their practical deployment is limited by slow inference. In this work, we enhance the Byte Latent Transformer (BLT) using new training and inference techniques. First, we introduce **BLT Diffusion (BLT-D)**, a new model and our fastest BLT variant. BLT-D is trained with an auxiliary block-wise diffusion objective over byte blocks alongside the standard next-byte prediction loss. This enables an inference procedure that generates multiple bytes in parallel per decoding step, substantially improving decoding efficiency. Second, we propose two extensions inspired by speculative decoding that trade some speed for improved quality: **BLT Self-speculation (BLT-S)**, a faster generation method for BLT in which it speculates bytes beyond its normal patch boundaries and verifies its own generations; and **BLT Diffusion+Verification (BLT-DV)**, which enhances BLT-D by adding an autoregressive verification step after diffusion-based generation. Each approach offers its own unique advantages, and together, they overcome key barriers to large-scale deployment of byte-level LMs.

Social Aspects · Fairness

Maaya Sakata, Kazuto Fukuchi

Post-hoc controllability of fair machine learning models, the ability to control the trade-off between fairness and accuracy after training, is valuable for practical deployment. Existing post-processing methods provide such post-hoc controllability but often suffer from significant accuracy degradation, whereas in-processing methods achieve efficient trade-offs but require computationally expensive retraining for each change in trade-off ratio. To achieve both post-hoc controllability and efficient trade-offs, we propose a novel fair classification algorithm that learns effective feature representations to improve the trade-off efficiency of post-processing fair classifiers, by a gradient-based optimization approach. Experimental results on real-world datasets demonstrate that our method achieves trade-off efficiency comparable to, or even surpassing, in-processing methods, without requiring any retraining.

Social Aspects · Fairness

Alexandre Verine, Rafael Pinot, Florian Le Bronnec

Fairness is a crucial concern for generative models, which not only reflect but can also amplify societal and cultural biases. Existing fairness notions for generative models are largely adapted from classification and focus on balancing the probability of generating samples from each sensitive group. We show that such criteria are brittle, as they can be met even when different sensitive groups are modeled with widely varying quality. To address this limitation, we introduce a new fairness definition for generative models, termed as \emph{equalized generative treatment} (EGT), which requires comparable generation quality across all sensitive groups, with quality measured via a reference $f$-divergence. We further analyze the trade-offs induced by EGT, demonstrating that enforcing fairness constraints necessarily couples the overall model quality to that of the most challenging group to approximate. This indicates that a simple yet efficient min–max fine-tuning method should be able to balance $f$-divergences across sensitive groups to satisfy EGT. We validate this theoretical insight through a set of experiments on both image and text generation tasks. We demonstrate that min-max methods consistently achieve fairer outcomes compared to other approaches from the literature, while maintaining competitive overall performance for both tasks.

Reinforcement Learning · Planning

Jesse Farebrother, Matteo Pirotta, Andrea Tirinzoni, Marc Bellemare, Alessandro Lazaric, Ahmed Touati

The ability to plan with temporal abstractions is central to intelligent decision-making. Rather than reasoning over primitive actions, we study agents that compose pre-trained policies as temporally extended actions, enabling solutions to complex tasks that no constituent alone could solve. Such compositional planning remains elusive as compounding errors in long-horizon predictions make it challenging to estimate the visitation distribution induced by sequencing policies. Motivated by the *geometric policy composition* framework introduced in Thakoor et al. (2022), we address these challenges by learning predictive models of multi-step dynamics, so-called *jumpy world models*, that capture state occupancies induced by pre-trained policies across multiple timescales in an off-policy manner. Building on Temporal Difference Flows (Farebrother et al., 2025), we enhance these models with a novel consistency objective that aligns predictions across timescales, improving long-horizon predictive accuracy. We further demonstrate how to combine these generative predictions to estimate the value of executing arbitrary sequences of policies over varying timescales. Empirically, we find that compositional planning with jumpy world models significantly improves zero-shot performance across a wide range of base policies on challenging manipulation and navigation tasks, yielding an average 200% relative improvement over planning with primitive actions on long-horizon tasks.

Probabilistic Methods · Monte Carlo and Sampling Methods

Byoungwoo Park, Juho Lee, Guan-Horng Liu

Learning-based methods for sampling from the Gibbs distribution in finite-dimensional spaces have progressed quickly, yet theory and algorithmic design for infinite-dimensional function spaces remain limited. This gap persists despite their strong potential for sampling the paths of conditional diffusion processes, enabling efficient simulation of trajectories of diffusion processes that respect rare events or boundary constraints. In this work, we present the adjoint sampler for infinite-dimensional function spaces, a stochastic optimal control-based diffusion sampler that operates in function space and targets Gibbs-type distributions on infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Our Functional Adjoint Sampler (FAS) generalizes Adjoint Sampling (Havens et al., 2025) to Hilbert spaces based on a SOC theory called stochastic maximum principle, yielding a simple and scalable matching-type objective for a functional representation. We show that FAS achieves superior transition path sampling performance across synthetic potential and real molecular systems, including Alanine Dipeptide and Chignolin.

Social Aspects · Fairness

Xuan Feng, Shuai Zhao, Luwei Xiao, Tianlong Gu, Bo An

Although Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable reasoning capabilities, inherent social biases often cascade throughout the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) process, leading to continuous "Bias Propagation". Existing debiasing methods primarily focus on static constraints or external interventions, failing to identify and interrupt this propagation once triggered. To address this limitation, we introduce Self-Debias, a progressive framework designed to instill intrinsic self-correction capabilities. Specifically, we reformulate the debiasing process as a strategic resource redistribution problem, treating the model's output probability mass as a limited resource to be reallocated from biased heuristics to unbiased reasoning paths. Unlike standard preference optimization which applies broad penalties, Self-Debias employs a fine-grained trajectory-level objective subject to dynamic debiasing constraints. This enables the model to selectively revise biased reasoning suffixes while preserving valid contextual prefixes. Furthermore, we integrate an online self-improvement mechanism utilizing consistency filtering to autonomously synthesize supervision signals. With merely 20k annotated samples, Self-Debias activates efficient self-correction, achieving superior debiasing performance while preserving general reasoning capabilities without continuous external oversight.

Deep Learning · Everything Else

Rim Assouel, Amir Bar, Michal Drozdzal, Adriana Romero-Soriano

Despite remarkable progress in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), these models still struggle with fine-grained understanding tasks. In this work, we propose **Procedurally Generated Tasks (PGT)** a simple data-driven framework that serves a dual purpose: inducing fine-grained visual understanding and acting as a low-cost diagnostic tool to identify the source of perception failures. By overlaying unambiguous geometric primitives on images, PGT generate additional dense supervision that disentangles visual grounding capability from semantic priors. Extensive experiments on relational, quantitative, and 3D/depth understanding benchmarks show that PGT yields remarkable gains across diverse architectures. Instruction tuning MLLMs on LLaVA-v1.5-Instruct augmented with PGT data results in improvements of up to +20\% on the What’sUp benchmark and +13.3\% on CV-Bench-2D, while maintaining general perception capabilities. Moreover, finetuning state-of-the-art MLLMs on PGT data leads to boosts of up to +5.5\% on What’sUp and +8.3\% on CV-Bench-2D. These findings demonstrate that PGT effectively address the bottleneck of fine-grained perception, revealing that many spatial reasoning deficits stem from inadequate supervision signals rather than inherent architectural or resolution limitations.

Chenxi Wan, Xunkai Li, Yilong Zuo, Haokun Deng, Sihan Li, Bowen Fan, Hongchao Qin, Rong-Hua Li, Guoren Wang

Multimodal-Attributed Graph (MAG) learning has achieved remarkable success in modeling complex real-world systems by integrating graph topology with rich attributes from multiple modalities. With the rapid proliferation of novel MAG models capable of handling intricate cross-modal semantics and structural dependencies, establishing a rigorous and unified evaluation standard has become imperative. Although existing benchmarks have facilitated initial progress, they exhibit critical limitations in *domain coverage*, *encoder flexibility*, *model diversity*, and *task scope*, presenting significant challenges to fair evaluation. To bridge this gap, we present OpenMAG, a comprehensive benchmark that integrates 19 datasets across 6 domains and incorporates 16 encoders to support both static and trainable feature encoding. OpenMAG further implements a standardized library of 24 state-of-the-art models and supports 8 downstream tasks, enabling fair comparisons within a unified framework. Through systematic assessment of necessity, data quality, effectiveness, robustness, and efficiency, we derive 14 fundamental insights into MAG learning to guide future advancements. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/OpenMAG-F703/.

Probabilistic Methods · Monte Carlo and Sampling Methods

Wei Guo, Yuchen Zhu, Xiaochen Du, Juno Nam, Yongxin Chen, Rafael Gomez-Bombarelli, Guan-Horng Liu, Molei Tao, Jaemoo Choi

Learning discrete neural samplers is challenging due to the lack of gradients and combinatorial complexity. While stochastic optimal control (SOC) and Schrödinger bridge (SB) provide principled solutions, efficient SOC solvers like adjoint matching (AM), which excel in continuous domains, remain unexplored for discrete spaces. We bridge this gap by revealing that the core mechanism of AM is *state-space agnostic*, and introduce **discrete ASBS**, a unified framework that extends AM and adjoint Schrödinger bridge sampler (ASBS) to discrete spaces. Theoretically, we analyze the optimality conditions of the discrete SB problem and its connection to SOC, identifying a necessary cyclic group structure on the state space to enable this extension. Empirically, discrete ASBS achieves competitive sample quality with significant advantages in training efficiency and scalability.

Bing Liu, Xinrui Shan, Boyu Zhang, Qiankun Zhang, Bin Yuan, Wang, Xianjun Deng

*Model merging* offers an appealing route to multi-task learning by composing independently fine-tuned checkpoints without centralized data or retraining. However, this convenience can come with a hidden cost. Model merging may *amplify* performance disparities across subgroups, raising fairness concerns even when average accuracy remains competitive. To explain this phenomenon, we develop a sensitivity-based theoretical analysis that upper bounds the fairness gap induced by model merging. Theoretical analysis with empirical verifications reveals that the resulting fairness gap is governed by two coupled factors, a *merging magnitude* term that measures how far the merged parameters move from the target model and *global sensitivity* terms that determine how unevenly the perturbation affects subgroup losses. Guided by these insights, we propose *FairMerging*, a two-stage merging framework that first reduces the sensitivity of the target model and then performs fairness-aware coefficient optimization with orthogonally normalized task vectors. Experiments across multiple datasets, backbones, and merging baselines demonstrate that FairMerging substantially mitigates unfairness while retaining competitive multi-task performance.

Social Aspects · Fairness

Minh Phu Vuong, Jinyoung Lee, Young-Ju Lee, Chul-Ho Lee

Fair graph clustering has emerged as a critical research area for addressing algorithmic bias in machine learning. The objective is to ensure that the proportion of each protected group within a cluster is consistent with its representation in the entire dataset. However, most existing spectral solutions rely on computationally expensive eigendecompositions of the graph Laplacian, limiting their scalability. In this paper, we propose Riemannian Fair Spectral Clustering (R-FairSC), a novel method that formulates fair spectral clustering as a constrained optimization problem on a Riemannian manifold. We develop a Riemannian alternating direction method of multipliers employing a variable-splitting strategy to efficiently solve the associated subproblems. Numerical experiments on large synthetic and real-world graphs demonstrate that R-FairSC significantly improves computational efficiency over state-of-the-art methods while maintaining high clustering quality and fairness.