Human Mesh Recovery (HMR) from a single RGB image is a highly ambiguous problem, as an infinite set of 3D interpretations can explain the 2D observation equally well. Nevertheless, most HMR methods overlook this issue and make a single prediction without accounting for this ambiguity. A few approaches generate a distribution of human meshes, enabling the sampling of multiple predictions; however, none of them is competitive with the latest single-output model when making a single prediction. This work proposes a new approach based on masked generative modeling. By tokenizing the human pose and shape, we formulate the HMR task as generating a sequence of discrete tokens conditioned on an input image. We introduce MEGA, a MaskEd Generative Autoencoder trained to recover human meshes from images and partial human mesh token sequences. Given an image, our flexible generation scheme allows us to predict a single human mesh in deterministic mode or to generate multiple human meshes in stochastic mode. Experiments on in-the-wild benchmarks show that MEGA achieves state-of-the-art performance in deterministic and stochastic modes, outperforming single-output and multi-output approaches.
论文检索
输入标题、作者或关键词，从 7,537 篇学术成果中精准定位
Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), backbone architecture in `almost' every computer vision task, are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, particularly physical out-of-distribution (OOD) adversarial patches. Existing defense models often struggle with interpreting these attacks in ways that align with human visual perception. Our proposed AdvPatchXAI approach introduces a generalized, robust, and explainable defense algorithm designed to defend DNNs against physical adversarial threats. AdvPatchXAI employs a novel patch decorrelation loss that reduces feature redundancy and enhances the distinctiveness of patch representations, enabling better generalization across unseen adversarial scenarios. It learns prototypical parts self-supervised, enhancing interpretability and correlation with human vision. The model utilizes a sparse linear layer for classification, making the decision process globally interpretable through a set of learned prototypes and locally explainable by pinpointing relevant prototypes within an image. Our comprehensive evaluation shows that AdvPatchXAI closes the "semantic" gap between latent space and pixel space and effectively handles unseen adversarial patches even perturbed with unseen corruptions, thereby significantly advancing DNN robustness in practical settings(https://github.com/tbvl22/Unified-resilient-and-Explainable-Adversarial-Patch-detector).
Medical Visual Question Answering (Med-VQA) systems benefit the interpretation of medical images containing critical clinical information. However, the challenge of noisy labels and limited high-quality datasets remains underexplored. To address this, we establish the first benchmark for noisy labels in Med-VQA by simulating human mislabeling with semantically designed noise types. More importantly, we introduce the DiN framework, which leverages a diffusion model to handle noisy labels in Med-VQA. Unlike the dominant classification-based VQA approaches that directly predict answers, our Answer Diffuser (AD) module employs a coarse-to-fine process, refining answer candidates with a diffusion model for improved accuracy. The Answer Condition Generator (ACG) further enhances this process by generating task-specific conditional information via integrating answer embeddings with fused image-question features. To address label noise, our Noisy Label Refinement(NLR) module introduces a robust loss function and dynamic answer adjustment to further boost the performance of the AD module. Our DiN framework consistently outperforms existing methods across multiple benchmarks with varying noise levels.
Anamorphosis refers to a category of images that are intentionally distorted, making them unrecognizable when viewed directly. Their true form only reveals itself when seen from a specific viewpoint, which can be through some catadioptric device like a mirror or a lens. While the construction of these mathematical devices can be traced back to as early as the 17th century, they are only interpretable when viewed from a specific vantage point and tend to lose meaning when seen normally. In this paper, we revisit these famous optical illusions with a generative twist. With the help of latent rectified flow models, we propose a method to create anamorphic images that still retain a valid interpretation when viewed directly. To this end, we introduce Laplacian Pyramid Warping, a frequency-aware image warping technique key to generating high-quality visuals. Our work extends Visual Anagrams (Geng et al. 2024) to latent space models and to a wider range of spatial transforms, enabling the creation of novel generative perceptual illusions.
Visual data is used in numerous different scientific workflows ranging from remote sensing to ecology. As the amount of observation data increases, the challenge is not just to make accurate predictions but also to understand the underlying mechanisms for those predictions. Good interpretation is important in scientific workflows, as it allows for better decision-making by providing insights into the data. This paper introduces an automatic way of obtaining such interpretable-by-design models, by learning programs that interleave neural networks. We propose DiSciPLE (Discovering Scientific Programs using LLMs and Evolution) an evolutionary algorithm that leverages common sense and prior knowledge of large language models (LLMs) to create Python programs explaining visual data. Additionally, we propose two improvements: a program critic and a program simplifier to improve our method further to synthesize good programs. On three different real world problems, DiSciPLE learns state-of-the-art programs on novel tasks with no prior literature. For example, we can learn programs with 35% lower error than the closest non-interpretable baseline for population density estimation.
With the explosion of human-machine interaction, emotion recognition has reignited attention. Previous works focus on improving visual feature fusion and reasoning from multiple image levels. Although it is non-trivial to deduce a person's emotion by integrating multi-level feature (head, body and context), the emotion recognition results of each level is usually different from one another, which creates inconsistency in the prevailing feature alignment method and decrease recognition performance. In this work, we propose a multi-level image feature refinement method for emotion recognition (CocoER) to mitigate the impact caused by conflicting results from multi-level recognition. First, we leverage cross-level attention to improve visual feature consistency between hierarchically cropped head, body and context windows. Then, vocabulary informed alignment is incorporated into the recognition framework to produce pseudo label and guide hierarchical visual feature refinement. To effectively fuse multi-level feature, we elaborate on a competition process of eliminating irrelevant image level predictions and a coordination process to enhance the feature across all levels. Extensive experiments are executed on two popular datasets, and our method achieves state-of-the-art performance with multi-level interpretation results.
Brain-inspired spiking neural networks (SNNs) have the capability of energy-efficient processing of temporal information. However, leveraging the rich dynamic characteristics of SNNs and prior works in artificial neural networks (ANNs) to construct an effective object detection model for visual tasks remains an open question for further exploration. To develop a directly-trained , low energy consumption and high-performance multi-scale SNN model, we propose a novel interpretable object detection framework Multi-scale Spiking Detector (MSD). Initially, we propose a spiking convolutional neuron as a core component of the Optic Nerve Nucleus Block (ONNB), designed to significantly enhance the deep feature extraction capabilities of SNNs. ONNB enables direct training with improved energy efficiency, demonstrating superior performance compared to state-of-the-art ANN-to-SNN conversion and SNN techniques. In addition, we propose a Multi-scale Spiking Detection Framework to emulate the biological response and comprehension of stimuli from different objects. Wherein, spiking multi-scale fusion and the spiking detector are employed to integrate features across different depths and to detect response outcomes, respectively. Our method outperforms state-of-the-art ANN detectors, with only 7.8 M parameters and 6.43 mJ energy consumption. MSD obtains the mean average precision (mAP) of 62.0% and 66.3% on COCO and Gen1 datasets, respectively.
Classifying images with an interpretable decision-making process is a long-standing problem in computer vision. In recent years, Prototypical Part Networks has gained traction as an approach for self-explainable neural networks, due to their ability to mimic human visual reasoning by providing explanations based on prototypical object parts. However, the quality of the explanations generated by these methods leaves room for improvement, as the prototypes usually focus on repetitive and redundant concepts. Leveraging recent advances in prototype learning, we present a framework for part-based interpretable image classification that learns a set of semantically distinctive object parts for each class, and provides diverse and comprehensive explanations. The core of our method is to learn the part-prototypes in a non-parametric fashion, through clustering deep features extracted from foundation vision models that encode robust semantic information. To quantitatively evaluate the quality of explanations provided by ProtoPNets, we introduce Distinctiveness Score and Comprehensiveness Score. Through evaluation on CUB-200-2011, Stanford Cars and Stanford Dogs datasets, we show that our framework compares favourably against existing ProtoPNets while achieving better interpretability.
Large models can achieve higher performance on complex problems through iterative self-reflection. Yet when reflection is uncontrolled, it often leads to longer outputs, higher inference cost, and an increased risk of hallucination. Existing training methods rarely address this trade off. We introduce ReFLAIR, a unified framework that teaches multimodal large models to perform structured reflection via an explicit $think re-think answer $ format and hybrid reward learning. ReFLAIR begins with supervised cold start training on the ReFLAIR-cold dataset of curated multimodal reasoning trajectories, and then trains a Reflection Quality Scorer (RQS) to quantify the utility of rethinking steps. A modified Group Relative Policy Optimization algorithm optimizes a hybrid reward that combines answer correctness, structural fidelity, reflection utility, and sample difficulty. Evaluated on challenging mathematical benchmarks including MathVista, MathVerse, MM-Math and GSM8K, ReFLAIR yields improvements up to +12.2% absolute accuracy, produces higher quality reflective traces, and reduces harmful or redundant revisions. An adaptive test time reflection scheduler further reduces inference cost by nearly 23% while maintaining or improving accuracy. These results demonstrate that structured, reward guided reflection offers a scalable pathway to more reliable and interpretable reasoning in multimodal models.
InterFeedback: Unveiling Interactive Intelligence of Large Multimodal Models with Human Feedback
PDF ↗Existing benchmarks do not test Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) on their interactive intelligence with human users which is vital for developing general-purpose AI assistants. We design InterFeedback, an interactive framework, which can be applied to any LMM and dataset to assess this ability autonomously. On top of this, we introduce InterFeedback-Bench that evaluates interactive intelligence using two representative datasets, MMMU-Pro and MathVerse, to test 10 different open-source LMMs. Additionally, we present InterFeedback-Human, a newly collected dataset of 120 cases designed for manually testing interactive performance in leading models such as OpenAI-o1 and Claude-3.5-Sonnet. Our evaluation results show that state-of-the-art LMM (e.g., OpenAI-o1) can correct their results through human feedback less than 50%. Our findings point to the need for methods that can enhance LMMs’ capabilities to interpret and benefit from feedback.
Decision-making tasks have highlighted fundamental challenges in grounding decisions within real-world contexts. Traditional decision knowledge utilization methods often struggle to effectively integrate structured decision constraints, limiting their ability to decompose high-level tasks, maintain logical consistency, and adapt to dynamic environments. To bridge this gap, we introduce StructuThink, a knowledge-structured reasoning framework that enhances LLM-based agents with explicit decision constraints. Specifically, we propose the Task Transition Knowledge Graph (TTKG) that learning decision knowledge in embodied scenarios. Leveraging this knowledge, we propose the StructuThink framework, comprising a subtask chain constructor for grounding natural language instructions and a constraint-based executor for adaptive and consistent decision-making. We validate StructuThink across multiple benchmarks, including ALFWorld and WebShop, where it achieves higher task success rates (improving by up to 7%) and more efficient action sequences (requiring up to 15% fewer steps) than baseline methods. Our approach enables LLMs to more effectively ground decision-making in domain-specific scenarios, enhancing both interpretability and reliability, thus paving the way for more reliable and adaptable decision-making systems.
Third-Person Appraisal Agent: Simulating Human Emotional Reasoning in Text with Large Language Models
PDF ↗Emotional reasoning is essential for improving human-AI interactions, particularly in mental health support and empathetic systems. However, current approaches, which primarily map sensory inputs to fixed emotion labels, fail to understand the intricate relationships between motivations, thoughts, and emotions, thereby limiting their ability to generalize across flexible emotional reasoning tasks. To address this, we propose a novel third-person appraisal agent that simulates human-like emotional reasoning through three phases: Primary Appraisal, Secondary Appraisal, and Reappraisal. In the Primary Appraisal phase, a third-person generator powered by a large language model (LLM) infers emotions based on cognitive appraisal theory. The Secondary Appraisal phase uses an evaluator LLM to provide feedback, guiding the generator in refining its predictions. The generator then uses counterfactual reasoning to adjust its process and explore alternative emotional responses. The Reappraisal phase utilizes reinforced fine-tuning (ReFT) by employing a reflective actor-critic framework to further enhance the model’s performance and generalization. This process uses reward signals and learns from appraisal trajectories without human annotations. Our approach outperforms baseline LLMs in various emotional reasoning tasks, demonstrating superior generalization and interpretability. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first cognition-based architecture designed to enhance emotional reasoning in LLMs, advancing AI towards human-like emotional understanding.
No Black Boxes: Interpretable and Interactable Predictive Healthcare with Knowledge-Enhanced Agentic Causal Discovery
PDF ↗Deep learning models trained on extensive Electronic Health Records (EHR) data have achieved high accuracy in diagnosis prediction, offering the potential to assist clinicians in decision-making and treatment planning. However, these models lack two crucial features that clinicians highly value: interpretability and interactivity. The “black-box” nature of these models makes it difficult for clinicians to understand the reasoning behind predictions, limiting their ability to make informed decisions. Additionally, the absence of interactive mechanisms prevents clinicians from incorporating their own knowledge and experience into the decision-making process. To address these limitations, we propose II-KEA, a knowledge-enhanced agent-driven causal discovery framework that integrates personalized knowledge databases and agentic LLMs. II-KEA enhances interpretability through explicit reasoning and causal analysis, while also improving interactivity by allowing clinicians to inject their knowledge and experience through customized knowledge bases and prompts. II-KEA is evaluated on both MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV, demonstrating superior performance along with enhanced interpretability and interactivity, as evidenced by its strong results from extensive case studies.
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have enabled GUI agents to interact with operating systems by grounding language into spatial actions. Despite their promising performance, these models frequently exhibit hallucinations—systematic localization errors that compromise reliability. We propose a fine-grained evaluation framework that categorizes model predictions into four distinct types, revealing nuanced failure modes beyond traditional accuracy metrics. To better quantify model uncertainty, we introduce the Peak Sharpness Score (PSS), a metric that evaluates the alignment between semantic continuity and logits distribution in coordinate prediction. Building on this insight, we further propose Context-Aware Cropping, a training-free technique that improves model performance by adaptively refining input context. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our framework and methods provide actionable insights and enhance the interpretability and robustness of GUI agent behavior.
Visual metaphors are a complex vision–language phenomenon that requires both perceptual and conceptual reasoning to understand. They provide a valuable test of a model’s ability to interpret visual input and reason about it with creativity and coherence. We introduce ImageMet, a visual metaphor dataset, featuring 2177 synthetic and 350 human-annotated images. We benchmark several SOTA VLMs on two tasks: Visual Metaphor Captioning (VMC) and Visual Metaphor VQA (VM-VQA). We establish strong baselines by fine-tuning on ImageMet, which yields substantial performance gains in VMC (+4.67% SBERT-Similarity, +4.84% task-specific metric) and VM-VQA (+9.3% Accuracy on average). Additionally, we introduce a task-specific CoT prompting strategy that outperforms standard few-shot baselines (+1.99% in VMC, +5.21% in VM-VQA). We observe that despite strong performance on the VMC task, VLMs still significantly lag behind humans in understanding visual metaphors, indicating that their success often relies on learned associations rather than genuine analytical reasoning. We note that this gap is often obscured in metaphor captioning tasks where the automatic metrics correlate only moderately at best with human judgment (Pearson r < 0.6), highlighting the need for careful, holistic evaluation of the visual metaphor understanding of the models.
Vision–language models (VLMs) often process visual inputs through a pretrained vision encoder, followed by a projection into the language model’s embedding space via a connector component. While crucial for modality fusion, the potential information loss induced by this projection step and its direct impact on model capabilities remain understudied. We introduce two complementary approaches to examine and quantify this loss by analyzing the latent representation space. First, we evaluate semantic information preservation by analyzing changes in k-nearest neighbor relationships between image representations, before and after projection. Second, we directly measure information loss by reconstructing visual embeddings from the projected representation, localizing loss at an image patch level. Experiments reveal that connectors substantially distort the local geometry of visual representations, with k-nearest neighbors diverging by 40–60% post-projection, correlating with degradation in retrieval performance. The patch-level embedding reconstruction provides interpretable insights for model behavior on visually grounded question-answering tasks, finding that areas of high information loss reliably predict instances where models struggle.
Combining pre-trained expert models offers substantial potential for scalable multimodal reasoning, but building a unified framework remains challenging due to the increasing diversity of input modalities and task complexity. For instance, medical diagnosis requires precise reasoning over structured clinical tables, while financial forecasting depends on interpreting plot-based data to make informed predictions. To tackle this challenge, we introduce MEXA, a training-free framework that performs modality- and task-aware aggregation of multiple expert models to enable effective multimodal reasoning across diverse and distinct domains. MEXA dynamically selects expert models based on the input modality and the task-specific reasoning demands (i.e., skills). Each expert model, specialized in a modality task pair, generates interpretable textual reasoning outputs. MEXA then aggregates and reasons over these outputs using a Large Reasoning Model (LRM) to produce the final answer. This modular design allows flexible and transparent multimodal reasoning across diverse domains without additional training overhead. We extensively evaluate our approach on diverse multimodal benchmarks, including Video Reasoning, Audio Reasoning, 3D Understanding, and Medical QA. MEXA consistently delivers performance improvements over strong multimodal baselines, highlighting the effectiveness and broad applicability of our expert-driven selection and aggregation in diverse multimodal reasoning tasks.
Understanding Theory of Mind is essential for building socially intelligent multimodal agents capable of perceiving and interpreting human behavior. We introduce MoMentS (Multimodal Mental States), a comprehensive benchmark designed to assess the ToM capabilities of multimodal large language models (LLMs) through realistic, narrative-rich scenarios presented in short films. MoMentS includes over 2,300 multiple-choice questions spanning seven distinct ToM categories. The benchmark features long video context windows and realistic social interactions that provide deeper insight into characters’ mental states. We evaluate several MLLMs and find that although vision generally improves performance, models still struggle to integrate it effectively. For audio, models that process dialogues as audio do not consistently outperform transcript-based inputs. Our findings highlight the need to improve multimodal integration and point to open challenges that must be addressed to advance AI’s social understanding.
Transformer-based models are highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where even small perturbations can cause significant misclassifications. This paper introduces *I-Guard*, a defense framework to increase the robustness of transformer-based models against adversarial perturbations. *I-Guard* leverages model interpretability to identify influential parameters responsible for adversarial misclassifications. By selectively fine-tuning a small fraction of model parameters, our approach effectively balances performance on both original and adversarial test sets. We conduct extensive experiments on English and code-mixed Hinglish datasets and demonstrate that *I-Guard* significantly improves model robustness. Furthermore, we demonstrate the transferability of *I-Guard* in handling other character-based perturbations.
We study the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in detecting fine-grained anomalies in tabular data. Specifically, we examine: (1) how well LLMs can identify diverse anomaly types including factual, logical, temporal, and value-based errors; (2) the impact of prompt design and prompting strategies; and (3) the effect of table structure and anomaly type on detection accuracy. To this end, we introduce TABARD, a new benchmark constructed by perturbing tables from WikiTQ, FeTaQA, Spider, and BEAVER. The dataset spans multiple domains and eight anomaly categories, including paired clean and corrupted tables. We evaluate LLMs using direct, indirect, and Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. Our results reveal notable limitations in standard prompting, especially for complex reasoning tasks and longer tables. To overcome these issues, we propose a unified framework combining multi-step prompting, self-verification, and constraint-based rule execution. Our approach significantly improves precision and recall, offering a promising direction for robust and interpretable anomaly detection in tables.